From ad1193e7adcb51147335bf83e6229b3ea47bb4b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:40:03 +0000 Subject: * dwarf2-frame.c (dwarf2_frame_cache): Update comment. * frame.c (frame_unwind_address_in_block): Delete. (get_frame_address_in_block): Do not use it. Check the type of the next frame first. (frame_cleanup_after_sniffer): Update comment. * frame.h (frame_unwind_address_in_block): Delete prototype. * hppa-tdep.c (hppa_find_unwind_entry_in_block): Update comment. --- gdb/hppa-tdep.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'gdb/hppa-tdep.c') diff --git a/gdb/hppa-tdep.c b/gdb/hppa-tdep.c index 8e9b507..ace04a3 100644 --- a/gdb/hppa-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/hppa-tdep.c @@ -1792,7 +1792,7 @@ hppa_find_unwind_entry_in_block (struct frame_info *this_frame) CORE_ADDR pc = get_frame_address_in_block (this_frame); /* FIXME drow/20070101: Calling gdbarch_addr_bits_remove on the - result of frame_unwind_address_in_block implies a problem. + result of get_frame_address_in_block implies a problem. The bits should have been removed earlier, before the return value of frame_pc_unwind. That might be happening already; if it isn't, it should be fixed. Then this call can be -- cgit v1.1