From ce2826aa7a697eed52dcb0aee57d087b285ebef0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Cagney Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:37:04 +0000 Subject: Index: mi/ChangeLog 2003-10-24 Andrew Cagney * tui-out.c: Fix "fortunatly"[sic]. Index: doc/ChangeLog 2003-10-24 Andrew Cagney * annotate.texinfo: Fix "fortunatly"[sic]. 2003-10-24 Andrew Cagney * osabi.c (gdbarch_init_osabi): Fix typos, and "fortunatly"[sic]. * PROBLEMS, arch-utils.c, cli-out.c, command.h: Ditto. * complaints.c, cris-tdep.c, disasm.c, dwarf2-frame.c: Ditto. * frame.c, frame.h, infcall.c, infcmd.c, infrun.c: Ditto. * kod.c, mips-tdep.c, regcache.c, regcache.h, remote.c: Ditto. --- gdb/frame.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'gdb/frame.c') diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c index 3a4b709..a405a6b 100644 --- a/gdb/frame.c +++ b/gdb/frame.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct frame_info /* The frame's type. */ /* FIXME: cagney/2003-04-02: Should instead be returning - ->unwind->type. Unfortunatly, legacy code is still explicitly + ->unwind->type. Unfortunately, legacy code is still explicitly setting the type using the method deprecated_set_frame_type. Eliminate that method and this field can be eliminated. */ enum frame_type type; @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ get_frame_id (struct frame_info *fi) fi->unwind = frame_unwind_find_by_frame (fi->next); /* FIXME: cagney/2003-04-02: Rather than storing the frame's type in the frame, the unwinder's type should be returned - directly. Unfortunatly, legacy code, called by + directly. Unfortunately, legacy code, called by legacy_get_prev_frame, explicitly set the frames type using the method deprecated_set_frame_type(). */ gdb_assert (fi->unwind->type != UNKNOWN_FRAME); @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ frame_pop (struct frame_info *this_frame) burst register transfer and that the sequence of register writes should be batched. The pair target_prepare_to_store() and target_store_registers() kind of suggest this - functionality. Unfortunatly, they don't implement it. Their + functionality. Unfortunately, they don't implement it. Their lack of a formal definition can lead to targets writing back bogus values (arguably a bug in the target code mind). */ /* Now copy those saved registers into the current regcache. @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ frame_register_unwind (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum, frame->unwind = frame_unwind_find_by_frame (frame->next); /* FIXME: cagney/2003-04-02: Rather than storing the frame's type in the frame, the unwinder's type should be returned - directly. Unfortunatly, legacy code, called by + directly. Unfortunately, legacy code, called by legacy_get_prev_frame, explicitly set the frames type using the method deprecated_set_frame_type(). */ gdb_assert (frame->unwind->type != UNKNOWN_FRAME); @@ -953,7 +953,7 @@ legacy_saved_regs_prev_register (struct frame_info *next_frame, int *realnump, void *bufferp) { /* HACK: New code is passed the next frame and this cache. - Unfortunatly, old code expects this frame. Since this is a + Unfortunately, old code expects this frame. Since this is a backward compatibility hack, cheat by walking one level along the prologue chain to the frame the old code expects. @@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ legacy_get_prev_frame (struct frame_info *this_frame) DEPRECATED_INIT_FRAME_PC_FIRST and DEPRECATED_FRAME_INIT_SAVED_REGS methods are full of work-arounds that handle the frame not being correctly set from the start. - Unfortunatly those same work-arounds rely on the type defaulting + Unfortunately those same work-arounds rely on the type defaulting to NORMAL_FRAME. Ulgh! The new frame code does not have this problem. */ prev->type = UNKNOWN_FRAME; @@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ legacy_get_prev_frame (struct frame_info *this_frame) /* FIXME: cagney/2002-01-19: This call will go away. Instead of initializing extra info, all frames will use the frame_cache (passed to the unwind functions) to store additional frame - info. Unfortunatly legacy targets can't use + info. Unfortunately legacy targets can't use legacy_get_prev_frame() to unwind the sentinel frame and, consequently, are forced to take this code path and rely on the below call to DEPRECATED_INIT_EXTRA_FRAME_INFO to @@ -1506,7 +1506,7 @@ legacy_get_prev_frame (struct frame_info *this_frame) prev->unwind = frame_unwind_find_by_frame (this_frame->next); /* FIXME: cagney/2003-04-02: Rather than storing the frame's type in the frame, the unwinder's type should be returned - directly. Unfortunatly, legacy code, called by + directly. Unfortunately, legacy code, called by legacy_get_prev_frame, explicitly set the frames type using the method deprecated_set_frame_type(). */ prev->type = prev->unwind->type; @@ -2159,7 +2159,7 @@ get_frame_type (struct frame_info *frame) frame->unwind = frame_unwind_find_by_frame (frame->next); /* FIXME: cagney/2003-04-02: Rather than storing the frame's type in the frame, the unwinder's type should be returned - directly. Unfortunatly, legacy code, called by + directly. Unfortunately, legacy code, called by legacy_get_prev_frame, explicitly set the frames type using the method deprecated_set_frame_type(). */ gdb_assert (frame->unwind->type != UNKNOWN_FRAME); -- cgit v1.1