From 8400d40d954ec3b4a3fe9200645a1b6e90ba46f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Modra Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 20:57:27 +1030 Subject: Indirect and warning symbols It's possible but unlikely that an indirect symbol points at a warning symbol. * elf64-ppc.c (add_symbol_adjust): Correct order of tests for warning and indirect symbols. --- bfd/elf64-ppc.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'bfd/elf64-ppc.c') diff --git a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c index bfdfc09..d7d6adb 100644 --- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c +++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c @@ -5063,12 +5063,12 @@ add_symbol_adjust (struct ppc_link_hash_entry *eh, struct bfd_link_info *info) struct ppc_link_hash_table *htab; struct ppc_link_hash_entry *fdh; - if (eh->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect) - return TRUE; - if (eh->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_warning) eh = (struct ppc_link_hash_entry *) eh->elf.root.u.i.link; + if (eh->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect) + return TRUE; + if (eh->elf.root.root.string[0] != '.') abort (); -- cgit v1.1