From c75e31a1ec593cf7c27ed8acca4fe3e77e2cfc53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Marchi Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 23:00:10 -0400 Subject: gdb: use inferior parameter in add_vsyscall_page Use the new inferior parameter instead of target_gdbarch. There are still hidden references to the current context behind core_bfd and exec_bfd, but this seemed better than nothing. gdb/ChangeLog: * symfile-mem.c (add_vsyscall_page): Use inferior parameter instead of target_gdbarch. Change-Id: Iaf5ace555ee8e46cbef5190aca1f6fe639f06677 --- gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gdb/symfile-mem.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index c1a92bb..2606f87 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ 2020-10-24 Simon Marchi + * symfile-mem.c (add_vsyscall_page): Use inferior parameter + instead of target_gdbarch. + +2020-10-24 Simon Marchi + * jit.c (jit_reader_load_command): Pass current inferior. (jit_inferior_init): Change parameter type to inferior, use it. (jit_inferior_created): Remove. diff --git a/gdb/symfile-mem.c b/gdb/symfile-mem.c index 18ab935..62c5664 100644 --- a/gdb/symfile-mem.c +++ b/gdb/symfile-mem.c @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ #include "auxv.h" #include "elf/common.h" #include "gdb_bfd.h" +#include "inferior.h" /* Verify parameters of target_read_memory_bfd and target_read_memory are compatible. */ @@ -161,7 +162,7 @@ add_vsyscall_page (inferior *inf) { struct mem_range vsyscall_range; - if (gdbarch_vsyscall_range (target_gdbarch (), &vsyscall_range)) + if (gdbarch_vsyscall_range (inf->gdbarch, &vsyscall_range)) { struct bfd *bfd; -- cgit v1.1