From 14e9c72c334205c0171d62e716c1fb65472a0eab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom de Vries Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:37:15 +0100 Subject: [gdb/testsuite] Avoid breakpoint in GLIBC in gdb.threads/execl.exp When running the gdb.threads/execl.exp test-case, we run into this FAIL: ... (gdb) continue^M Continuing.^M ^M Thread 1 "execl" hit Breakpoint 2, __GI_execl (path=0x6024a0 \ "build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/execl/execl1", \ arg=) at execl.c:51^M 51 if (execl (new_image, new_image, NULL) == -1) \ /* set breakpoint here */^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/execl.exp: continue across exec ... The fail is due to the continue command hitting a breakpoint in __GI_execl rather than main. This problem originates from where we execute the "b 51" command, and get two breakpoint locations: ... (gdb) run ^M Starting program: build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/execl/execl ^M [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]^M Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".^M ^M Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd3f8) at gdb.threads/execl.c:44^M 44 pthread_create (&thread1, NULL, thread_function, NULL);^M (gdb) b 51^M Breakpoint 2 at 0x400787: gdb.threads/execl.c:51. (2 locations)^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/execl.exp: set breakpoint at execl ... Adding a "info breakpoints" command, we can see the locations: ... (gdb) info breakpoints^M Num Type Disp Enb Address What^M 1 breakpoint keep y 0x00000000004006ee in main at \ gdb.threads/execl.c:44^M breakpoint already hit 1 time^M 2 breakpoint keep y ^M 2.1 y 0x0000000000400787 in main at \ gdb.threads/execl.c:51^M 2.2 y 0x00007ffff758d925 in __GI_execl at \ execl.c:51^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/execl.exp: info breakpoints ... The fact that the __GI_execl breakpoint location is there, is a bug, filed as PR25656. Without debug info for GLIBC though, the bug is not triggered. Fix the FAIL by working around the bug, and deleting the breakpoint after hitting the first breakpoint location. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-03-12 Tom de Vries * gdb.threads/execl.exp: Delete breakpoint after hitting it. --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/execl.exp | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog index f6b1a56..6fc24e1 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ 2020-03-12 Tom de Vries + * gdb.threads/execl.exp: Delete breakpoint after hitting it. + +2020-03-12 Tom de Vries + * gdb.fortran/module.exp: Use exp_continue during matching of output of "info variable -n". diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/execl.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/execl.exp index 5f28fed..1649081 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/execl.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/execl.exp @@ -42,6 +42,13 @@ gdb_test "continue" ".*breakpoint here.*" "continue to exec" gdb_test "info threads" "1 *Thread.*2 *Thread.*3 *Thread.*" "info threads before exec" +# Work around PR25656, where the breakpoint above sets 2 breakpoint locations: +# - one on gdb.threads/execl.c:$linenumber, and +# - one in GLIBC's execl.c:$linenumber, in __GI_execl +# Delete the breakpoint to make sure we hit main upon continue, rather than +# __GI_execl. +gdb_test_no_output "delete 2" + # When continuing from this point we'll hit the breakpoint in main() # again, this time in the exec'd process. gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint 1, main.*" \ -- cgit v1.1