aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdbserver/linux-aarch32-tdesc.cc
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-10-11Revert "gdbserver: pass osabi to GDB in target description"Andrew Burgess1-1/+1
This reverts commit 98bcde5e268ea7cd54186c5f2c27c65103218fc3. This commit was causing build problems on at least sparc, ppc, and s390, though I suspect some other targets might be impacted too.
2024-10-10gdbserver: pass osabi to GDB in target descriptionAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
On a Windows machine I built gdbserver, configured for the target 'x86_64-w64-mingw32', then on a GNU/Linux machine I built GDB with support for all target (--enable-targets=all). On the Windows machine I start gdbserver with a small test binary: $ gdbserver 192.168.129.25:54321 C:\some\directory\executable.exe On the GNU/Linux machine I start GDB without the test binary, and connect to gdbserver. As I have not given GDB the test binary, my expectation is that GDB would connect to gdbserver and then download the file over the remote protocol, but instead I was presented with this message: (gdb) target remote 192.168.129.25:54321 Remote debugging using 192.168.129.25:54321 warning: C:\some\directory\executable.exe: No such file or directory. 0x00007ffa3e1e1741 in ?? () (gdb) What I found is that if I told GDB where to find the binary, like this: (gdb) file target:C:/some/directory/executable.exe A program is being debugged already. Are you sure you want to change the file? (y or n) y Reading C:/some/directory/executable.exe from remote target... warning: File transfers from remote targets can be slow. Use "set sysroot" to access files locally instead. Reading C:/some/directory/executable.exe from remote target... Reading symbols from target:C:/some/directory/executable.exe... (gdb) then GDB would download the executable. I eventually tracked the problem down to exec_file_find (solib.c). The remote target was passing an absolute Windows filename (beginning with "C:/" in this case), but in exec_file_find GDB was failing the IS_TARGET_ABSOLUTE_PATH call, and so was treating the filename as relative. The IS_TARGET_ABSOLUTE_PATH call was failing because GDB thought that the file system kind was "unix", and as the filename didn't start with a "/" it assumed the filename was not absolute. But I'm connecting to a Windows target, my 'target-file-system-kind' was set to "auto", so should be figuring out that my file-system is "dos-based". Looking in effective_target_file_system_kind (filesystem.c), we find that the logic of "auto" is delegated to the current gdbarch. However in windows-tdep.c we see: set_gdbarch_has_dos_based_file_system (gdbarch, 1); So if we are using a Windows gdbarch we should have "dos-based" filesystems. What this means is that after connecting to the remote target GDB has selected the wrong gdbarch. What's happening is that the target description sent back by the remote target only includes the x86-64 registers. There's no information about which OS we're on. As a consequence, GDB picks the first x86-64 gdbarch which can handle the provided register set, which happens to be a GNU/Linux gdbarch. And indeed, there doesn't appear to be anywhere in gdbserver that sets the osabi on the target descriptions, though some target descriptions do have their osabi set when the description is created, e.g. in: gdb/arch/amd64.c - Sets GNU/Linux osabi when appropriate. gdb/arch/i386.c - Likewise. gdb/arch/tic6x.c - Always set GNU/Linux osabi. Most target descriptions are created without an osabi, gdbserver does nothing to fix this, and the description is returned to GDB without an osabi included. I propose that we always set the osabi name on the target descriptions returned from gdbserver. We could try to do this when the description is first created, but that would mean passing extra flags into the tdesc creation code (or just passing the osabi string in), and I don't think that's really necessary. If we consider the tdesc creation as being about figuring out which registers are on the target, then it makes sense that the osabi information is injected later. So what I've done is require the osabi name to be passed to the init_target_desc function. This is called, I believe, for all targets, in the gdbserver code. Now when I connect to the Windows remote the target description returned includes the osabi name. With this extra information GDB selects the correct gdbarch object, which means that GDB understands the target has a "dos-based" file-system. With that correct GDB understands that the filename it was given is absolute, and so fetches the file from the remote as we'd like. Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2024-03-26gdb, gdbserver, gdbsupport: remove includes of early headersSimon Marchi1-1/+0
Now that defs.h, server.h and common-defs.h are included via the `-include` option, it is no longer necessary for source files to include them. Remove all the inclusions of these files I could find. Update the generation scripts where relevant. Change-Id: Ia026cff269c1b7ae7386dd3619bc9bb6a5332837 Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
2024-02-29gdb/arm: Remove tpidruro register from non-FreeBSD target descriptionsThiago Jung Bauermann1-1/+1
Commit 92d48a1e4eac ("Add an arm-tls feature which includes the tpidruro register from CP15.") introduced the org.gnu.gdb.arm.tls feature, which adds the tpidruro register, and unconditionally enabled it in aarch32_create_target_description. In Linux, the tpidruro register isn't available via ptrace in the 32-bit kernel but it is available for an aarch32 program running under an arm64 kernel via the ptrace compat interface. This isn't currently implemented however, which causes GDB on arm-linux with 64-bit kernel to list the register but show it as unavailable, as reported by Tom de Vries: $ gdb -q -batch a.out -ex start -ex 'p $tpidruro' Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x512 Temporary breakpoint 1, 0xaaaaa512 in main () $1 = <unavailable> Simon Marchi then clarified: > The only time we should be seeing some "unavailable" registers or memory > is in the context of tracepoints, for things that are not collected. > Seeing an unavailable register here is a sign that something is not > right. Therefore, disable the TLS feature in aarch32 target descriptions for Linux and NetBSD targets (the latter also doesn't seem to support accessing tpidruro either, based on a quick look at arm-netbsd-nat.c). This patch fixes the following tests: Running gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp ... FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 3: backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 3 FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 5: backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 5 FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 1: backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 1 Tested with Ubuntu 22.04.3 on armv8l-linux-gnueabihf in native, native-gdbserver and native-extended-gdbserver targets with no regressions. PR tdep/31418 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31418 Approved-By: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
2024-01-12Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
This commit is the result of the following actions: - Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to include 2024, - Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the file, - Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright date, - Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've updated them this year to 2024. I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as you spot them.
2023-01-01Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script, which automated the update of the copyright year range for all source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include year 2023.
2022-01-01Automatic Copyright Year update after running gdb/copyright.pyJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure. For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were performed by the script.
2021-01-01Update copyright year range in all GDB filesJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start of New Year procedure... gdb/ChangeLog Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
2020-02-13gdbserver: rename source files to .ccSimon Marchi1-0/+50
For the same reasons outlined in the previous patch, this patch renames gdbserver source files to .cc. I have moved the "-x c++" switch to only those rules that require it. gdbserver/ChangeLog: * Makefile.in: Rename source files from .c to .cc. * %.c: Rename to %.cc. * configure.ac: Rename server.c to server.cc. * configure: Re-generate.