aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-07-25gdb/fortran: resolve dynamic types when readjusting after an indirectionAndrew Burgess9-19/+233
After dereferencing a pointer (in value_ind) or following a reference (in coerce_ref) we call readjust_indirect_value_type to "fixup" the type of the resulting value object. This fixup handles cases relating to the type of the resulting object being different (a sub-class) of the original pointers target type. If we encounter a pointer to a dynamic type then after dereferencing a pointer (in value_ind) the type of the object created will have had its dynamic type resolved. However, in readjust_indirect_value_type, we use the target type of the original pointer to "fixup" the type of the resulting value. In this case, the target type will be a dynamic type, so the resulting value object, once again has a dynamic type. This then triggers an assertion later within GDB. The solution I propose here is that we call resolve_dynamic_type on the pointer's target type (within readjust_indirect_value_type) so that the resulting value is not converted back to a dynamic type. The test case is based on the original test in the bug report. gdb/ChangeLog: PR fortran/23051 PR fortran/26139 * valops.c (value_ind): Pass address to readjust_indirect_value_type. * value.c (readjust_indirect_value_type): Make parameter non-const, and add extra address parameter. Resolve original type before using it. * value.h (readjust_indirect_value_type): Update function signature and comment. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/23051 PR fortran/26139 * gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp: New file. * gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.f90: New file. * gdb.fortran/pointer-to-pointer.exp: New file. * gdb.fortran/pointer-to-pointer.f90: New file.
2020-07-25[gdb/symtab] Ignore zero line table entriesTom de Vries5-2/+217
The DWARF standard states for the line register in the line number information state machine the following: ... An unsigned integer indicating a source line number. Lines are numbered beginning at 1. The compiler may emit the value 0 in cases where an instruction cannot be attributed to any source line. ... So, it's possible to have a zero line number in the DWARF line table. This is currently not handled by GDB. The zero value is read in as any other line number, but internally the zero value has a special meaning: end-of-sequence, so the line table entry ends up having a different interpretation than intended in some situations. I've created a test-case where various aspects are tested, which has these 4 interesting tests. 1. Next-step through a zero-line instruction, is_stmt == 1 gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: bar1, 2nd next 2. Next-step through a zero-line instruction, is_stmt == 0 gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: bar2, 2nd next 3. Show source location at zero-line instruction, is_stmt == 1 gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: continue to breakpoint: bar1_label_3 4. Show source location at zero-line instruction, is_stmt == 0 gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: continue to breakpoint: bar2_label_3 And we have the following results: 8.3.1, 9.2: ... FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: bar1, 2nd next PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: bar2, 2nd next PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: continue to breakpoint: bar1_label_3 FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: continue to breakpoint: bar2_label_3 ... commit 8c95582da8 "gdb: Add support for tracking the DWARF line table is-stmt field": ... PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: bar1, 2nd next PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: bar2, 2nd next FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: continue to breakpoint: bar1_label_3 FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: continue to breakpoint: bar2_label_3 ... commit d8cc8af6a1 "[gdb/symtab] Fix line-table end-of-sequence sorting", master: FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: bar1, 2nd next FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: bar2, 2nd next PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: continue to breakpoint: bar1_label_3 PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: continue to breakpoint: bar2_label_3 ... The regression in test 2 at commit d8cc8af6a1 was filed as PR symtab/26243, where clang emits zero line numbers. The way to fix all tests is to make sure line number zero internally doesn't clash with special meaning values, and by handling it appropriately everywhere. That however looks too intrusive for the GDB 10 release. Instead, we decide to ensure defined behaviour for line number zero by ignoring it. This gives us back the test results from before commit d8cc8af6a1, fixing PR26243. We mark the FAILs for tests 3 and 4 as KFAILs. Test 4 was already failing for the 9.2 release, and we consider the regression of test 3 from gdb 9.2 to gdb 10 the cost for having defined behaviour. Build and reg-tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-25 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR symtab/26243 * dwarf2/read.c (lnp_state_machine::record_line): Ignore zero line entries. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-07-25 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR symtab/26243 * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.c: New test. * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp: New file.
2020-07-24config/debuginfod.m4: Use PKG_CHECK_MODULESAaron Merey3-104/+268
Use PKG_CHECK_MODULES to set debuginfod autoconf vars. Also add pkg.m4 to config/. ChangeLog: * config/debuginfod.m4: use PKG_CHECK_MODULES. * config/pkg.m4: New file. * configure: Rebuild. * configure.ac: Remove AC_DEBUGINFOD. ChangeLog/binutils: * Makefile.am: Replace LIBDEBUGINFOD with DEBUGINFOD_LIBS. * Makefile.in: Rebuild. * configure: Rebuild. * doc/Makefile.in: Rebuild. ChangeLog/gdb: * Makefile.in: Replace LIBDEBUGINFOD with DEBUGINFOD_LIBS. * configure: Rebuild.
2020-07-24[gdb/testsuite] Require gnatmake-8 for gdb.ada/mi_prot.expTom de Vries2-0/+8
With gcc-7, I run into: ... gcc -c -I./ -gnata -Isrc/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/mi_prot -g -lm -I- \ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/mi_prot/prot.adb^M prot.adb:21:04: info: "Obj_Type" is frozen here, aspects evaluated at this \ point^M prot.adb:23:09: visibility of aspect for "Obj_Type" changes after freeze \ point^M gnatmake: "src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/mi_prot/prot.adb" compilation error^M compiler exited with status 1 ... FAIL: gdb.ada/mi_prot.exp: compilation prot.adb ... Fix this by requiring gnatmake-8 for this test-case. Tested on x86_64-linux, with gnatmake-7, gnatmake-8 and gnatmake-11. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-07-24 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR testsuite/26293 * gdb.ada/mi_prot.exp: Require gnatmake-8.
2020-07-23Fix BZ 26294 - Add period to help text for maint print core-file-backed-mappingsKevin Buettner2-1/+7
gdb/ChangeLog: PR corefiles/26294 * corelow.c (_initialize_corelow): Add period to help text for "maintenance print core-file-backed-mappings".
2020-07-23Don't touch frame_info objects if frame cache was reinitializedPedro Alves6-29/+144
This fixes yet another bug exposed by ASAN + multi-target.exp Running an Asan-enabled GDB against gdb.multi/multi-target.exp exposed yet another latent GDB bug. See here for the full log: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-July/170761.html As Simon described, the problem is: - We create a new frame_info object in restore_selected_frame (by calling find_relative_frame) - The frame is allocated on the frame_cache_obstack - In frame_unwind_try_unwinder, we try to find an unwinder for that frame - While trying unwinders, memory read fails because the remote target closes, because of "monitor exit" - That calls reinit_frame_cache (as shown above), which resets frame_cache_obstack - When handling the exception in frame_unwind_try_unwinder, we try to set some things on the frame_info object (like *this_cache, which in fact tries to write into frame_info::prologue_cache), but the frame_info object is no more, it went away with the obstack. Fix this by maintaining a frame cache generation counter. Then in exception handling code paths, don't touch frame objects if the generation is not the same as it was on entry. This commit generalizes the gdb.server/server-kill.exp testcase and reuses it to test the scenario in question. The new tests fail without the GDB fix. gdb/ChangeLog: * frame-unwind.c (frame_unwind_try_unwinder): On exception, don't touch THIS_CACHE/THIS_FRAME if the frame cache was cleared meanwhile. * frame.c (frame_cache_generation, get_frame_cache_generation): New. (reinit_frame_cache): Increment FRAME_CACHE_GENERATION. (get_prev_frame_if_no_cycle): On exception, don't touch PREV_FRAME/THIS_FRAME if the frame cache was cleared meanwhile. * frame.h (get_frame_cache_generation): Declare. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.server/server-kill.exp (prepare): New, factored out from the top level. (kill_server): New. (test_tstatus, test_unwind_nosyms, test_unwind_syms): New. (top level) : Call test_tstatus, test_unwind_nosyms, test_unwind_syms.
2020-07-23[gdb/tui] Fix Wmaybe-uninitialized warning in tui-winsource.cTom de Vries2-0/+11
When compiling with CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS="-O0 -g -Wall" and using g++ 11.0.0, we run into: ... src/gdb/tui/tui-winsource.c: In function \ 'void tui_update_all_breakpoint_info(breakpoint*)': src/gdb/tui/tui-winsource.c:427:58: warning: '<unknown>' may be used \ uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 427 | for (tui_source_window_base *win : tui_source_windows ()) | ^ In file included from src/gdb/tui/tui-winsource.c:38: src/gdb/tui/tui-winsource.h:236:30: note: by argument 1 of type \ 'const tui_source_windows*' to 'tui_source_window_iterator \ tui_source_windows::begin() const' declared here 236 | tui_source_window_iterator begin () const | ^~~~~ src/gdb/tui/tui-winsource.c:427:58: note: '<anonymous>' declared here 427 | for (tui_source_window_base *win : tui_source_windows ()) | ^ ... The warning doesn't make sense for an empty struct, PR gcc/96295 has been filed about that. For now, work around the warning by defining a default constructor. Build on x86_64-linux. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-23 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR tui/26282 * tui/tui-winsource.h (struct tui_source_windows::tui_source_windows): New default constructor.
2020-07-23gdb/disassembly: Update to handle non-statement addressesAndrew Burgess4-6/+215
After the introduction of support for non-statement addresses in the line table, the output for 'disassemble /m' can be broken in some cases. With the /m format disassembly GDB associates a set of addresses with each line, these addresses are then sorted and printed for each line. When the non-statement support was added GDB was incorrectly told to ignore non-statement instructions, and not add these to the result table. This means that these instructions are completely missing from the output. This commit removes the code that caused non-statement lines to be ignored. A result of this change is that GDB will now potentially include new line numbers in the 'disassemble /m' output, lines that previously were only in the line table as non-statement lines will now appear in the disassembly output. This feels like an improvement though. gdb/ChangeLog: * disasm.c (do_mixed_source_and_assembly_deprecated): Don't exclude non-statement entries. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-disasm-over-non-stmt.exp: New file.
2020-07-22Fix more bugs in gdb testglue wrapper handlingSandra Loosemore2-12/+22
In commit 24ac169ac5a918cd82b7485935f0c40a094c625e, this patch: 2020-02-21 Shahab Vahedi <shahab@synopsys.com> * lib/gdb.exp (gdb_wrapper_init): Reset "gdb_wrapper_initialized" to 0 if "wrapper_file" does not exist. attempted to fix problems finding the gdb test wrapper gdb_tg.o in some tests that cd to some non-default directory by rebuilding also the test wrapper in that directory. This had the side-effect of leaving these .o files in various places in the GDB source directory tree. Furthermore, while the tests that cd to some non-default directory cannot run on remote host, the code that was added to probe for the presence of the wrapper file was also specific to host == build. This patch reverts the problematic parts of that commit and replaces it with forcing use of an absolute (rather than relative) pathname to the .o file for linking when host == build. While debugging this patch, I also observed that use of the construct "[info exists gdb_wrapper_file]" was not reliable for detecting when that variable had been initialized by gdb_wrapper_init. I rewrote that so that the variable is always initialized and has a value of an empty string when no wrapper file is needed. 2020-07-22 Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com> gdb/testsuite/ * lib/gdb.exp (gdb_wrapper_file, gdb_wrapper_flags): Initialize to empty string at top level. (gdb_wrapper_init): Revert check for file existence on build. Build the wrapper in its default place, not a build-specific location. When host == build, make the pathname absolute. (gdb_compile): Delete leftover declaration of gdb_wrapper_initialized. Check gdb_wrapper_file being an empty string instead of uninitialized.
2020-07-22New core file tests with mappings over existing program memoryKevin Buettner3-0/+340
This test case was inspired by Pedro's demonstration of a problem with my v2 patches. It can be found here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168826.html In a nutshell, my earlier patches could not handle the case in which a read-only mapping created with mmap() was created at an address used by other file-backed read-only memory in use by the process. This problem has been fixed (for Linux, anyway) by the commit "Use NT_FILE note section for reading core target memory". When I run this test without any of my recent corefile patches, I see these failures: FAIL: gdb.base/corefile2.exp: kernel core: print/x mbuf_ro[0]@4 FAIL: gdb.base/corefile2.exp: kernel core: print/x mbuf_ro[pagesize-4]@4 FAIL: gdb.base/corefile2.exp: kernel core: print/x mbuf_ro[-3]@6 FAIL: gdb.base/corefile2.exp: kernel core: print/x mbuf_rw[pagesize-3]@6 FAIL: gdb.base/corefile2.exp: kernel core: print/x mbuf_ro[pagesize-3]@6 FAIL: gdb.base/corefile2.exp: maint print core-file-backed-mappings FAIL: gdb.base/corefile2.exp: gcore core: print/x mbuf_ro[-3]@6 The ones involving mbuf_ro will almost certainly fail when run on non-Linux systems; I've used setup_xfail on those tests to prevent them from outright FAILing when not run on Linux. For a time, I had considered skipping these tests altogether when not run on Linux, but I changed my mind due to this failure... FAIL: gdb.base/corefile2.exp: print/x mbuf_rw[pagesize-3]@6 I think it *should* pass without my recent corefile patches. The fact that it doesn't is likely due to a bug in GDB. The following interaction with GDB demonstrates the problem: (gdb) print/x mbuf_rw[pagesize-3]@6 $1 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0} (gdb) print/x mbuf_rw[pagesize]@3 $2 = {0x6b, 0x6b, 0x6b} The last three values in display of $1 should be the same as those shown by $2. Like this... (gdb) print/x mbuf_rw[pagesize-3]@6 $1 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x6b, 0x6b, 0x6b} (gdb) print/x mbuf_rw[pagesize]@3 $2 = {0x6b, 0x6b, 0x6b} That latter output was obtained with the use of all of my current corefile patches. I see no failures on Linux when running this test with my current set of corefile patches. I tested 3 architectures: x86_64, s390x, and aarch64. I also tested on FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE. I see the following results both with and without the current set of core file patches: # of expected passes 26 # of expected failures 8 Of particular interest is that I did *not* see the problematic mbuf_rw failure noted earlier (both with and without the core file patches). I still don't have an explanation for why this failure occurred on Linux. Prior to running the tests, I had hypothesized that I'd see this failure on FreeBSD too, but testing shows that this is not the case. Also of importance is that we see no FAILs with this test on FreeBSD which indicates that I XFAILed the correct tests. This version runs the interesting tests twice, once with a kernel created core file and another time with a gcore created core file. It also does a very minimal test of the new command "maint print core-file-backed-mappings". gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.base/corefile2.exp: New file. * gdb.base/coremaker2.exp: New file.
2020-07-22Add documentation for "maint print core-file-backed-mappings"Kevin Buettner4-0/+22
gdb/ChangeLog: * NEWS (New commands): Mention new command "maintenance print core-file-backed-mappings". gdb/doc/ChangeLog: * gdb.texinfo (Maintenance Commands): Add documentation for new command "maintenance print core-file-backed-mappings".
2020-07-22Add new command "maint print core-file-backed-mappings"Kevin Buettner2-0/+96
I wrote a read_core_file_mappings method for FreeBSD and then registered this gdbarch method. I saw some strange behavior while testing it and wanted a way to make sure that mappings were being correctly loaded into corelow.c, so I wrote the new command which is the topic of this commit. I think it might be occasionally useful for debugging strange corefile behavior. With regard to FreeBSD, my work isn't ready yet. Unlike Linux, FreeBSD puts all mappings into its core file note. And, unlike Linux, it doesn't dump load segments which occupy no space in the file. So my (perhaps naive) implementation of a FreeBSD read_core_file_mappings didn't work all that well: I saw more failures in the corefile2.exp tests than without it. I think it should be possible to make FreeBSD work as well as Linux, but it will require doing something with all of the mappings, not just the file based mappings that I was considering. In the v4 series, Pedro asked the following: I don't understand what this command provides that "info proc mappings" doesn't? Can you give an example of when you'd use this command over "info proc mappings" ? On Linux, "info proc mappings" and "maint print core-file-backed-mappings" will produce similar, possibly identical, output. This need not be the case for other OSes. E.g. on FreeBSD, had I finished the implementation, the output from these commands would have been very different. The FreeBSD "info proc mappings" command would show additional (non-file-backed) mappings in addition to at least one additional field (memory permissions) for each mapping. As noted earlier, I was seeing some unexpected behavior while working on the FreeBSD implementation and wanted to be certain that the mappings were being correctly loaded by corelow.c. "info proc mappings" prints the core file mappings, but doesn't tell us anything about whether they've been loaded by corelow.c This new maintenance command directly interrogates the data structures and prints the values found there. gdb/ChangeLog: * corelow.c (gdbcmd.h): Include. (core_target::info_proc_mappings): New method. (get_current_core_target): New function. (maintenance_print_core_file_backed_mappings): New function. (_initialize_corelow): Add core-file-backed-mappings to "maint print" commands.
2020-07-22Adjust coredump-filter.exp to account for NT_FILE note handlingKevin Buettner3-1/+35
This commit makes adjustments to coredump-filter.exp to account for the fact that NT_FILE file-backed mappings are now available when a core file is loaded. Thus, a test which was expected to PASS when a memory region was determined to be unavailable (due to no file-backed mappings being available) will now FAIL due to those mappings being available from having loaded the NT_FILE note. I had originally marked the test as XFAIL, but Mihails Strasuns suggested a much better approach: 1) First test that it still works if file is accessible in the filesystem. 2) Temporarily move / rename the file and test that disassembly doesn't work anymore. That's what this commit implements. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.base/coredump-filter.exp: Add second non-Private-Shared-Anon-File test. (test_disasm): Rename binfile for test which is expected to fail.
2020-07-22gcore command: Place all file-backed mappings in NT_FILE noteKevin Buettner1-4/+37
When making a core file with the GDB's gcore command on Linux, the same criteria used for determining which mappings should be dumped were also being used for determining which entries should be placed in the NT_FILE note. This is wrong; we want to place all file-backed mappings in this note. The predicate function, dump_mapping_p, was used to determine whether or not to dump a mapping from within linux_find_memory_regions_full. This commit leaves this predicate in place, but adds a new parameter, should_dump_mapping_p, to linux_find_memory_regions_full. It then calls should_dump_mapping_p instead of dump_mapping_p. dump_mapping_p is passed to linux_find_memory_regions_full at one call site; at the other call site, dump_note_entry_p is passed instead. gdb/ChangeLog: * linux-tdep.c (dump_note_entry_p): New function. (linux_dump_mapping_p_ftype): New typedef. (linux_find_memory_regions_full): Add new parameter, should_dump_mapping_p. (linux_find_memory_regions): Adjust call to linux_find_memory_regions_full. (linux_make_mappings_core_file_notes): Use dump_note_entry_p in call to linux_find_memory_regions_full.
2020-07-22Add test for accessing read-only mmapped data in a core fileKevin Buettner3-3/+36
This test passes when run using a GDB with my corefile patches. When run against a GDB without my patches, I see the following failures, the first of which is due to the test added by this commit: FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: accessing read-only mmapped data in core file (mapping address not found in core file) FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: accessing anonymous, unwritten-to mmap data gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.base/corefile.exp: Add test "accessing read-only mmapped data in core file". * gdb.base/coremaker.c (buf2ro): New global. (mmapdata): Add a read-only mmap mapping.
2020-07-22Use NT_FILE note section for reading core target memoryKevin Buettner3-71/+286
In his reviews of my v1 and v2 corefile related patches, Pedro identified two cases which weren't handled by those patches. In https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168826.html, Pedro showed that debugging a core file in which mmap() is used to create a new mapping over an existing file-backed mapping will produce incorrect results. I.e, for his example, GDB would show: (gdb) disassemble main Dump of assembler code for function main: 0x00000000004004e6 <+0>: push %rbp 0x00000000004004e7 <+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp => 0x00000000004004ea <+4>: callq 0x4003f0 <abort@plt> End of assembler dump. This sort of looks like it might be correct, but is not due to the fact that mmap(...MAP_FIXED...) was used to create a mapping (of all zeros) on top of the .text section. So, the correct result should be: (gdb) disassemble main Dump of assembler code for function main: 0x00000000004004e6 <+0>: add %al,(%rax) 0x00000000004004e8 <+2>: add %al,(%rax) => 0x00000000004004ea <+4>: add %al,(%rax) 0x00000000004004ec <+6>: add %al,(%rax) 0x00000000004004ee <+8>: add %al,(%rax) End of assembler dump. The other case that Pedro found involved an attempted examination of a particular section in the test case from gdb.base/corefile.exp. On Fedora 27 or 28, the following behavior may be observed: (gdb) info proc mappings Mapped address spaces: Start Addr End Addr Size Offset objfile ... 0x7ffff7839000 0x7ffff7a38000 0x1ff000 0x1b5000 /usr/lib64/libc-2.27.so ... (gdb) x/4x 0x7ffff7839000 0x7ffff7839000: Cannot access memory at address 0x7ffff7839000 FYI, this section appears to be unrelocated vtable data. See https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168331.html for a detailed analysis. The important thing here is that GDB should be able to access this address since it should be backed by the shared library. I.e. it should do this: (gdb) x/4x 0x7ffff7839000 0x7ffff7839000: 0x0007ddf0 0x00000000 0x0007dba0 0x00000000 Both of these cases are fixed with this commit. In a nutshell, this commit opens a "binary" target BFD for each of the files that are mentioned in an NT_FILE / .note.linuxcore.file note section. It then uses these mappings instead of the file stratum mappings that GDB has used in the past. If this note section doesn't exist or is mangled for some reason, then GDB will use the file stratum as before. Should this happen, then we can expect both of the above problems to again be present. See the code comments in the commit for other details. gdb/ChangeLog: * corelow.c (solist.h, unordered_map): Include. (class core_target): Add field m_core_file_mappings and method build_file_mappings. (core_target::core_target): Call build_file_mappings. (core_target::~core_target): Free memory associated with m_core_file_mappings. (core_target::build_file_mappings): New method. (core_target::xfer_partial): Use m_core_file_mappings for memory transfers. * linux-tdep.c (linux_read_core_file_mappings): New function. (linux_core_info_proc_mappings): Rewrite to use linux_read_core_file_mappings. (linux_init_abi): Register linux_read_core_file_mappings.
2020-07-22Add new gdbarch method, read_core_file_mappingsKevin Buettner6-0/+67
The new gdbarch method, read_core_file_mappings, will be used for reading file-backed mappings from a core file. It'll be used for two purposes: 1) to construct a table of file-backed mappings in corelow.c, and 2) for display of core file mappings. For Linux, I tried a different approach in which knowledge of the note format was placed directly in corelow.c. This seemed okay at first; it was only one note format and the note format was fairly simple. After looking at FreeBSD's note/mapping reading code, I concluded that it's best to leave architecture specific details for decoding the note in (architecture specific) tdep files. With regard to display of core file mappings, I experimented with placing the mappings display code in corelow.c. It has access to the file-backed mappings which were read in when the core file was loaded. And, better, still common code could be used for all architectures. But, again, the FreeBSD mapping code convinced me that this was not the best approach since it has even more mapping info than Linux. Display code which would work well for Linux will leave out mappings as well as protection info for mappings. So, for these reasons, I'm introducing a new gdbarch method for reading core file mappings. gdb/ChangeLog: * arch-utils.c (default_read_core_file_mappings): New function. * arch-utils.c (default_read_core_file_mappings): Declare. * gdbarch.sh (read_core_file_mappings): New gdbarch method. * gdbarch.h, gdbarch.c: Regenerate.
2020-07-22Test ability to access unwritten-to mmap data in core fileKevin Buettner3-1/+29
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR corefiles/25631 * gdb.base/corefile.exp (accessing anonymous, unwritten-to mmap data): New test. * gdb.base/coremaker.c (buf3): New global. (mmapdata): Add mmap call which uses MAP_ANONYMOUS and MAP_PRIVATE flags.
2020-07-22Provide access to non SEC_HAS_CONTENTS core file sectionsKevin Buettner3-8/+57
Consider the following program: - - - mkmmapcore.c - - - static char *buf; int main (int argc, char **argv) { buf = mmap (NULL, 8192, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0); abort (); } - - - end mkmmapcore.c - - - Compile it like this: gcc -g -o mkmmapcore mkmmapcore.c Now let's run it from GDB. I've already placed a breakpoint on the line with the abort() call and have run to that breakpoint. Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd678) at mkmmapcore.c:11 11 abort (); (gdb) x/x buf 0x7ffff7fcb000: 0x00000000 Note that we can examine the memory allocated via the call to mmap(). Now let's try debugging a core file created by running this program. Depending on your system, in order to make a core file, you may have to run the following as root (or using sudo): echo core > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern It may also be necessary to do: ulimit -c unlimited I'm using Fedora 31. YMMV if you're using one of the BSDs or some other (non-Linux) system. This is what things look like when we debug the core file: [kev@f31-1 tmp]$ gdb -q ./mkmmapcore core.304767 Reading symbols from ./mkmmapcore... [New LWP 304767] Core was generated by `/tmp/mkmmapcore'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 50 return ret; (gdb) x/x buf 0x7ffff7fcb000: Cannot access memory at address 0x7ffff7fcb000 Note that we can no longer access the memory region allocated by mmap(). Back in 2007, a hack for GDB was added to _bfd_elf_make_section_from_phdr() in bfd/elf.c: /* Hack for gdb. Segments that have not been modified do not have their contents written to a core file, on the assumption that a debugger can find the contents in the executable. We flag this case by setting the fake section size to zero. Note that "real" bss sections will always have their contents dumped to the core file. */ if (bfd_get_format (abfd) == bfd_core) newsect->size = 0; You can find the entire patch plus links to other discussion starting here: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00047.html This hack sets the size of certain BFD sections to 0, which effectively causes GDB to ignore them. I think it's likely that the bug described above existed even before this hack was added, but I have no easy way to test this now. The output from objdump -h shows the result of this hack: 25 load13 00000000 00007ffff7fcb000 0000000000000000 00013000 2**12 ALLOC (The first field, after load13, shows the size of 0.) Once the hack is removed, the output from objdump -h shows the correct size: 25 load13 00002000 00007ffff7fcb000 0000000000000000 00013000 2**12 ALLOC (This is a digression, but I think it's good that objdump will now show the correct size.) If we remove the hack from bfd/elf.c, but do nothing to GDB, we'll see the following regression: FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: print coremaker_ro The reason for this is that all sections which have the BFD flag SEC_ALLOC set, but for which SEC_HAS_CONTENTS is not set no longer have zero size. Some of these sections have data that can (and should) be read from the executable. (Sections for which SEC_HAS_CONTENTS is set should be read from the core file; sections which do not have this flag set need to either be read from the executable or, failing that, from the core file using whatever BFD decides is the best value to present to the user - it uses zeros.) At present, due to the way that the target strata are traversed when attempting to access memory, the non-SEC_HAS_CONTENTS sections will be read as zeroes from the process_stratum (which in this case is the core file stratum) without first checking the file stratum, which is where the data might actually be found. What we should be doing is this: - Attempt to access core file data for SEC_HAS_CONTENTS sections. - Attempt to access executable file data if the above fails. - Attempt to access core file data for non SEC_HAS_CONTENTS sections, if both of the above fail. This corresponds to the analysis of Daniel Jacobowitz back in 2007 when the hack was added to BFD: https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00045.html The difference, observed by Pedro in his review of my v1 patches, is that I'm using "the section flags as proxy for the p_filesz/p_memsz checks." gdb/ChangeLog: PR corefiles/25631 * corelow.c (core_target:xfer_partial): Revise TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY case to consider non-SEC_HAS_CONTENTS case after first checking the stratum beneath the core target. (has_all_memory): Return true. * target.c (raw_memory_xfer_partial): Revise comment regarding use of has_all_memory.
2020-07-22section_table_xfer_memory: Replace section name with callback predicateKevin Buettner6-14/+33
This patch is motivated by the need to be able to select sections that section_table_xfer_memory_partial should consider for memory transfers. I'll use this facility in the next patch in this series. section_table_xfer_memory_partial() can currently be passed a section name which may be used to make name-based selections. This is similar to what I want to do, except that I want to be able to consider section flags instead of the name. I'm replacing the section name parameter with a predicate that, when passed a pointer to a target_section struct, will return true if that section should be further considered, or false which indicates that it shouldn't. I've converted the one existing use where a non-NULL section name is passed to section_table_xfer_memory_partial(). Instead of passing the section name, it now looks like this: auto match_cb = [=] (const struct target_section *s) { return (strcmp (section_name, s->the_bfd_section->name) == 0); }; return section_table_xfer_memory_partial (readbuf, writebuf, memaddr, len, xfered_len, table->sections, table->sections_end, match_cb); The other callers all passed NULL; they've been simplified somewhat in that they no longer need to pass NULL. gdb/ChangeLog: * exec.h (section_table_xfer_memory): Revise declaration, replacing section name parameter with an optional callback predicate. * exec.c (section_table_xfer_memory): Likewise. * bfd-target.c, exec.c, target.c, corelow.c: Adjust all callers of section_table_xfer_memory.
2020-07-22Adjust corefile.exp test to show regression after bfd hack removalKevin Buettner2-0/+10
In his review of my BZ 25631 patch series, Pedro was unable to reproduce the regression which should occur after patch #1, "Remove hack for GDB which sets the section size to 0", is applied. Pedro was using an ld version older than 2.30. Version 2.30 introduced the linker option -z separate-code. Here's what the man page has to say about it: Create separate code "PT_LOAD" segment header in the object. This specifies a memory segment that should contain only instructions and must be in wholly disjoint pages from any other data. In ld version 2.31, use of separate-code became the default for Linux/x86. So, really, 2.31 or later is required in order to see the regression that occurs in recent Linux distributions when only the bfd hack removal patch is applied. For the test case in question, use of the separate-code linker option means that the global variable "coremaker_ro" ends up in a separate load segment (though potentially with other read-only data). The upshot of this is that when only patch #1 is applied, GDB won't be able to correctly access coremaker_ro. The reason for this is due to the fact that this section will now have a non-zero size, but will not have contents from the core file to find this data. So GDB will ask BFD for the contents and BFD will respond with zeroes for anything from those sections. GDB should instead be looking in the executable for this data. Failing that, it can then ask BFD for a reasonable value. This is what a later patch in this series does. When using ld versions earlier than 2.31 (or 2.30 w/ the -z separate-code option explicitly provided to the linker), there is the possibility that coremaker_ro ends up being placed near other data which is recorded in the core file. That means that the correct value will end up in the core file, simply because it resides on a page that the kernel chooses to put in the core file. This is why Pedro wasn't able to reproduce the regression that should occur after fixing the BFD hack. This patch places a big chunk of memory, two pages worth on x86, in front of "coremaker_ro" to attempt to force it onto another page without requiring use of that new-fangled linker switch. Speaking of which, I considered changing the test to use -z separate-code, but this won't work because it didn't exist prior to version 2.30. The linker would probably complain of an unrecognized switch. Also, it likely won't be available in other linkers not based on current binutils. I.e. it probably won't work in FreeBSD, NetBSD, etc. To make this more concrete, this is what *should* happen when attempting to access coremaker_ro when only patch #1 is applied: Core was generated by `/mesquite2/sourceware-git/f28-coresegs/bld/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/coref'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x00007f68205deefb in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) p coremaker_ro $1 = 0 Note that this result is wrong; 201 should have been printed instead. But that's the point of the rest of the patch series. However, without this commit, or when using an old Linux distro with a pre-2.31 ld, this is what you might see instead: Core was generated by `/mesquite2/sourceware-git/f28-coresegs/bld/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/coref'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x00007f63dd658efb in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) p coremaker_ro $1 = 201 I.e. it prints the right answer, which sort of makes it seem like the rest of the series isn't required. Now, back to the patch itself... what should be the size of the memory chunk placed before coremaker_ro? It needs to be at least as big as the page size (PAGE_SIZE) from the kernel. For x86 and several other architectures this value is 4096. I used MAPSIZE which is defined to be 8192 in coremaker.c. So it's twice as big as what's currently needed for most Linux architectures. The constant PAGE_SIZE is available from <sys/user.h>, but this isn't portable either. In the end, it seemed simpler to just pick a value and hope that it's big enough. (Running a separate program which finds the page size via sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) and then passes it to the compilation via a -D switch seemed like overkill for a case which is rendered moot by recent linker versions.) Further information can be found here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168168.html https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168170.html Thanks to H.J. Lu for telling me about the '-z separate-code' linker switch. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.base/coremaker.c (filler_ro): New global constant.
2020-07-22Fix crash in -stack-list-argumentsTom Tromey7-3/+148
-stack-list-arguments will crash when stopped in an Ada procedure that has an argument with a certain name ("_objectO" -- which can only be generated by the compiler). The bug occurs because lookup_symbol will fail in this case. This patch changes -stack-list-arguments to mirror what is done with arguments elsewhere. (As an aside, I don't understand why this lookup is even needed, but I assume it is some stabs thing?) In the longer term I think it would be good to share this code between MI and the CLI. However, due to the upcoming release, I preferred a more local fix. gdb/ChangeLog 2020-07-22 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> * mi/mi-cmd-stack.c (list_args_or_locals): Use lookup_symbol_search_name. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2020-07-22 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> * gdb.ada/mi_prot.exp: New file. * gdb.ada/mi_prot/pkg.adb: New file. * gdb.ada/mi_prot/pkg.ads: New file. * gdb.ada/mi_prot/prot.adb: New file.
2020-07-22Correct an error in the remote protocol specificationReuben Thomas2-4/+13
The list of commands that a stub must implement was wrong. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Reuben Thomas <rrt@sc3d.org> * gdb.texinfo (Remote Protocol, Overview): Correct the description of which remote protocol commands are mandatory for a stub to implement.
2020-07-22gdb/python: Use reference not pointer in py-registers.cAndrew Burgess2-9/+16
Pedro's review comments arrived after I'd already committed this change: commit f7306dac19c502232f766c3881313857915f330d Date: Tue Jul 7 15:00:30 2020 +0100 gdb/python: Reuse gdb.RegisterDescriptor objects where possible See: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-July/170726.html There should be no user visible changes after this commit. gdb/ChangeLog: * python/py-registers.c (gdbpy_register_object_data_init): Remove redundant local variable. (gdbpy_get_register_descriptor): Extract descriptor vector as a reference, not pointer, update code accordingly.
2020-07-22gdb/jit: skip jit symbol lookup if already detected the symbols don't existSimon Marchi3-2/+26
To detect whether an objfile is a JITer, we lookup JIT interface symbols in the objfile. If an objfile does not have these symbols, we conclude that it is not a JITer. An objfile that does not have the symbols will never have them. Therefore, once we do a lookup and find out that the objfile does not have JIT symbols, just set a flag so that we can skip symbol lookup for that objfile the next time we reset JIT breakpoints. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> * objfiles.h (struct objfile) <skip_jit_symbol_lookup>: New field. * jit.c (jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal): Use the `skip_jit_symbol_lookup` field.
2020-07-22gdb/jit: apply minor cleanup and modernizationSimon Marchi2-26/+40
gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> * jit.c (jit_read_descriptor): Define the descriptor address once, use twice. (jit_breakpoint_deleted): Move the declaration of the loop variable `iter` into the loop header. (jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal): Move the declaration of the local variable `objf_data` to the first point of definition. (jit_event_handler): Move the declaration of local variables `code_entry`, `entry_addr`, and `objf` to their first point of use. Rename `objf` to `jited`.
2020-07-22gdb/jit: remove jiter_objfile_data -> objfile back-linkSimon Marchi3-8/+7
This is no longer needed, remove it. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> * jit.h (struct jiter_objfile_data) <jiter_objfile_data, objfile>: Remove. * jit.c (get_jiter_objfile_data): Update.
2020-07-22gdb/jit: enable tracking multiple JITer objfilesTankut Baris Aktemur4-109/+126
GDB's JIT handler stores an objfile (and data associated with it) per program space to keep track of JIT breakpoint information. This assumes that there is at most one JITer objfile in the program space. However, there may be multiple. If so, only the first JITer's hook breakpoints would be realized and the JIT events from the other JITers would be missed. This patch removes that assumption, allowing an arbitrary number of objfiles within a program space to be JITers. - The "unique" program_space -> JITer objfile pointer in jit_program_space_data is removed. In fact, jit_program_space_data becomes empty, so it is removed entirely. - jit_breakpoint_deleted is modified, it now has to assume that any objfile in a program space is a potential JITer. It now iterates on all objfiles, checking if they are indeed JITers, and if they are, whether the deleted breakpoint belongs to them. - jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal also has to assume that any objfile in a program space is a potential JITer. It creates (or updates) one jiter_objfile_data structure for each JITer it finds. - Same for jit_inferior_init. It now iterates all objfiles to read the initial JIT object list. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> * jit.c (struct jit_program_space_data): Remove. (jit_program_space_key): Remove. (jiter_objfile_data::~jiter_objfile_data): Remove program space stuff. (get_jit_program_space_data): Remove. (jit_breakpoint_deleted): Iterate on all of the program space's objfiles. (jit_inferior_init): Likewise. (jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal): Likewise. Also change return type to void. (jit_breakpoint_re_set): Pass current_program_space to jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> * gdb.base/jit-reader-simple.exp: Add a scenario for a binary that loads two JITers.
2020-07-22gdb/jit: move cached_code_address and jit_breakpoint to jiter_objfile_dataSimon Marchi3-24/+34
This is in preparation for allowing more than one JITer objfile per program space. Once we do that, each JITer objfile will have its own JIT breakpoint (on the __jit_debug_register_code function it provides). The cached_code_address field is just the runtime / relocated address of that symbol. Since they are going to become JITer-objfile-specific and not program-space-specific, move these fields from jit_program_space_data to jiter_objfile_data. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> * jit.h (struct jiter_objfile_data) <cached_code_address, jit_breakpoint>: Move to here from ... * jit.c (jit_program_space_data): ... here. (jiter_objfile_data::~jiter_objfile_data): Update. (jit_breakpoint_deleted): Update. (jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal): Update.
2020-07-22gdb/jit: apply some simplifications and assertionsSimon Marchi2-17/+23
Following patch "gdb/jit: split jit_objfile_data in two", there are some simplifications we can make. The invariants described there mean that we can assume / assert some things instead of checking them using conditionals. If an instance of jiter_objfile_data exists for a given objfile, it's because the required JIT interface symbols were found. Therefore, in ~jiter_objfile_data, the `register_code` field can't be NULL. It was previously used to differentiate a jit_objfile_data object used for a JITer vs a JITed. We can remove that check. If an instance of jiter_objfile_data exists for a given objfile, it's because it's the sole JITer objfile in the scope of its program space (jit_program_space_data::objfile points to it). At the moment, jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal won't create a second instance of jiter_objfile_data for a given program space. Therefore, it's not necessary to check for `ps_data != NULL` in ~jiter_objfile_data: we know a jit_program_space_data for that program space exists. We also don't need to check for `ps_data->objfile == this->objfile`, because we know the objfile is the sole JITer in this program space. Replace these two conditions with assertions. A pre-condition for calling the jit_read_descriptor function (which is respected in the two call sites) is that the objfile `jiter` _is_ a JITer - it already has a jiter_objfile_data attached to it. When a jiter_objfile_data exists, its `descriptor` field is necessarily set: had the descriptor symbol not been found, jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal would not have created the jiter_objfile_data. Remove the check and early return in jit_read_descriptor. Access objfile's `jiter_data` field directly instead of calling `get_jiter_objfile_data` (which creates the jiter_objfile_data if it doesn't exist yet) and assert that the result is not nullptr. Finally, `jit_event_handler` is always passed a JITer objfile. So, add an assertion to ensure that. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> * jit.c (jiter_objfile_data::~jiter_objfile_data): Remove some checks. (jit_read_descriptor): Remove NULL check. (jit_event_handler): Add an assertion.
2020-07-22gdb/jit: split jit_objfile_data in twoSimon Marchi4-31/+57
The jit_objfile_data is currently used to hold information about both objfiles that are the result of JIT compilation (JITed) and objfiles that can produce JITed objfiles (JITers). I think that this double use of the type is confusing, and that things would be more obvious if we had one type for each role. This patch splits it into: - jited_objfile_data: for data about an objfile that is the result of a JIT compilation - jiter_objfile_data: for data about an objfile which produces JITed objfiles There are now two JIT-related fields in an objfile, one for each kind. With this change, the following invariants hold: - an objfile has a non-null `jiter_data` field iff it defines the required symbols of the JIT interface - an objfile has a non-null `jited_data` field iff it is the product of JIT compilation (has been produced by some JITer) gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> * jit.h (struct jit_objfile_data): Split into... (struct jiter_objfile_data): ... this ... (struct jited_objfile_data): ... and this. * objfiles.h (struct objfile) <jit_data>: Remove. <jiter_data, jited_data>: New fields. * jit.c (jit_objfile_data::~jit_objfile_data): Rename to ... (jiter_objfile_data::~jiter_objfile_data): ... this. (get_jit_objfile_data): Rename to ... (get_jiter_objfile_data): ... this. (add_objfile_entry): Update. (jit_read_descriptor): Use get_jiter_objfile_data. (jit_find_objf_with_entry_addr): Use objfile's jited_data field. (jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal): Use get_jiter_objfile_data. (jit_inferior_exit_hook): Use objfile's jited_data field.
2020-07-22gdb/jit: link to jit_objfile_data directly from the objfile structSimon Marchi4-61/+72
Remove the use of objfile_data to associate a jit_objfile_data with an objfile. Instead, directly link to a jit_objfile_data from an objfile struct. The goal is to eliminate unnecessary abstraction. The free_objfile_data function naturally becomes the destructor of jit_objfile_data. However, free_objfile_data accesses the objfile to which the data is attached, which the destructor of jit_objfile_data doesn't have access to. To work around this, add a backlink to the owning objfile in jit_objfile_data. This is however temporary, it goes away in a subsequent patch. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> * jit.h: Forward-declare `struct minimal_symbol`. (struct jit_objfile_data): Migrate to here from jit.c; also add a constructor, destructor, and an objfile* field. * jit.c (jit_objfile_data): Remove. (struct jit_objfile_data): Migrate from here to jit.h. (jit_objfile_data::~jit_objfile_data): New destructor implementation with code moved from free_objfile_data. (free_objfile_data): Delete. (get_jit_objfile_data): Update to use the jit_data field of objfile. (jit_find_objf_with_entry_addr): Ditto. (jit_inferior_exit_hook): Ditto. (_initialize_jit): Remove the call to register_objfile_data_with_cleanup. * objfiles.h (struct objfile) <jit_data>: New field.
2020-07-22gdb/jit: pass the jiter objfile as an argument to jit_event_handlerTankut Baris Aktemur4-15/+34
This is a refactoring that adds a new parameter to the `jit_event_handler` function: the JITer objfile. The goal is to distinguish which JITer triggered the JIT event, in case there are multiple JITers -- a capability that is added in a subsequent patch. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-07-22 Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> * jit.h: Forward-declare `struct objfile`. (jit_event_handler): Add a second parameter, the JITer objfile. * jit.c (jit_read_descriptor): Change the signature to take the JITer objfile as an argument instead of the jit_program_space_data. (jit_inferior_init): Update the call to jit_read_descriptor. (jit_event_handler): Use the new JITer objfile argument when calling jit_read_descriptor. * breakpoint.c (handle_jit_event): Update the call to jit_event_handler to pass the JITer objfile.
2020-07-21Retire the now-unused gdbarch handle_segmentation_fault hook.John Baldwin5-66/+9
* gdbarch.c: Regenerate. * gdbarch.h: Regenerate. * gdbarch.sh (handle_segmentation_fault): Remove method. * infrun.c (handle_segmentation_fault): Remove. (print_signal_received_reason): Remove call to handle_segmentation_fault.
2020-07-21Migrate the sparc64 ADI handle_segmentation_fault hook to report_signal_info.John Baldwin2-6/+14
gdb/ChangeLog: * sparc64-linux-tdep.c (sparc64_linux_handle_segmentation_fault): Rename to sparc64_linux_report_signal_info and add siggnal argument. (sparc64_linux_init_abi): Use sparc64_linux_report_signal_info instead of sparc64_linux_handle_segmentation_fault.
2020-07-21Migrate the x86 MPX handle_segmentation_fault hook to report_signal_info.John Baldwin4-10/+21
gdb/ChangeLog: * amd64-linux-tdep.c (amd64_linux_init_abi_common): Use i386_linux_report_signal_info instead of i386_linux_handle_segmentation_fault. * i386-linux-tdep.c (i386_linux_handle_segmentation_fault): Rename to i386_linux_report_signal_info and add siggnal argument. (i386_linux_init_abi): Use i386_linux_report_signal_info instead of i386_linux_handle_segmentation_fault. * i386-linux-tdep.h (i386_linux_handle_segmentation_fault): Rename to i386_linux_report_signal_info and add siggnal argument.
2020-07-21Report architecture-specific signal information for core files.John Baldwin2-1/+9
When opening a core file, if the process terminated due to a signal, invoke the gdbarch report_signal_info hook to report architecture-specific information about the signal. gdb/ChangeLog: * corelow.c (core_target_open): Invoke gdbarch report_signal_info hook if present.
2020-07-21Add a new gdbarch hook to report additional signal information.John Baldwin5-0/+60
This is a more general version of the existing handle_segmentation_fault hook that is able to report information for an arbitrary signal, not just SIGSEGV. gdb/ChangeLog: * gdbarch.c: Regenerate. * gdbarch.h: Regenerate. * gdbarch.sh (report_signal_info): New method. * infrun.c (print_signal_received_reason): Invoke gdbarch report_signal_info hook if present.
2020-07-21gdb/python: Reuse gdb.RegisterGroup objects where possibleAndrew Burgess4-11/+61
Only create one gdb.RegisterGroup Python object for each of GDB's reggroup objects. I could have added a field into the reggroup object to hold the Python object pointer for each reggroup, however, as reggroups are never deleted within GDB, and are global (not per-architecture) a simpler solution seemed to be just to hold a single global map from reggroup pointer to a Python object representing the reggroup. Then we can reuse the objects out of this map. After this commit it is possible for a user to tell that two gdb.RegisterGroup objects are now identical when previously they were unique, however, as both these objects are read-only I don't think this should be a problem. There should be no other user visible changes after this commit. gdb/ChangeLog: * python/py-registers.c : Add 'unordered_map' include. (gdbpy_new_reggroup): Renamed to... (gdbpy_get_reggroup): ...this. Update to only create register group descriptors when needed. (gdbpy_reggroup_iter_next): Update. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.python/py-arch-reg-groups.exp: Additional tests.
2020-07-21gdb/python: Reuse gdb.RegisterDescriptor objects where possibleAndrew Burgess4-13/+82
Instead of having the gdb.RegisterDescriptorIterator creating new gdb.RegisterDescriptor objects for each regnum, instead cache gdb.RegisterDescriptor objects on the gdbarch object and reuse these. This means that for every gdbarch/regnum pair there is a single unique gdb.RegisterDescriptor, this feels like a neater implementation than the existing one. It is possible for a user to see (in Python code) that the descriptors are now identical, but as the descriptors are read-only this should make no real difference. There should be no other user visible changes. gdb/ChangeLog: * python/py-registers.c (gdbpy_register_object_data): New static global. (gdbpy_register_object_data_init): New function. (gdbpy_new_register_descriptor): Renamed to... (gdbpy_get_register_descriptor): ...this, and update to reuse existing register descriptors where possible. (gdbpy_register_descriptor_iter_next): Update. (gdbpy_initialize_registers): Register new gdbarch data. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.python/py-arch-reg-names.exp: Additional tests.
2020-07-21gdb, gdbserver: make stopped_pids global variables staticSimon Marchi2-1/+5
I noticed that my IDE was confusing the two stopped_pids variables. There is one in GDB and one in GDBserver. They should be static, make them so. gdb/ChangeLog: * linux-nat.c (stopped_pids): Make static. gdbserver/ChangeLog: * linux-low.cc (stopped_pids): Make static. Change-Id: If4a2bdcd45d32eb3a732d266a0f686a4e4c23672
2020-07-21gdb: handle undefined properties in ada_discrete_type_{low,high}_boundSimon Marchi2-2/+36
This patch fixes a failure in test `gdb.ada/access_to_packed_array.exp`. The failure was introduced by 8c2e4e0689ea24 ("gdb: add accessors to struct dynamic_prop"), but I think it in fact exposed a latent buglet. Note that to reproduce it, I had to use AdaCore's Ada "distribution" [1]. The one that comes with my distro doesn't have debug info for the standard library stuff, so the bug wouldn't trigger. The bug is that while executing the `maint print symbols` command, we are accessing the value of a range type's high bound dynamic prop as a "const" value (PROP_CONST), when it is actually undefined (PROP_UNDEFINED). It results in this failed assertion: /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/gdbtypes.h:526: internal-error: LONGEST dynamic_prop::const_val() const: Assertion `m_kind == PROP_CONST' failed. `ada_discrete_type_high_bound` calls `resolve_dynamic_type`, which eventually calls `resolve_dynamic_range`. This one is responsible for evaluating a range type's dynamic bounds in the current context and returning static values. It returns a new range type with these static bounds. The resulting bounds are typically properties of the PROP_CONST kind. But when it's not possible to evaluate the properties, the properties are PROP_UNDEFINED. In the case we are looking at, it's not possible to evaluate the dynamic high bound, which is of type PROP_LOCLIST. It would require a target with registers and a frame, but we run `maint print symbols` without a live process. `ada_discrete_type_high_bound` then accesses the high bound unconditionally as a const value, which triggers the assert. Note that the previous code in resolve_dynamic_range (before commit 8c2e4e0689ea24) did this: prop = &TYPE_RANGE_DATA (dyn_range_type)->high; if (dwarf2_evaluate_property (prop, NULL, addr_stack, &value)) { high_bound.kind = PROP_CONST; high_bound.data.const_val = value; if (TYPE_RANGE_DATA (dyn_range_type)->flag_upper_bound_is_count) high_bound.data.const_val = low_bound.data.const_val + high_bound.data.const_val - 1; } else { high_bound.kind = PROP_UNDEFINED; high_bound.data.const_val = 0; } That did not really made sense, setting the kind to `PROP_UNDEFINED` but also setting the `const_val` field. The `const_val` field is only meaningful if the kind if `PROP_CONST`. The new code (post-8c2e4e0689ea24) simply calls `set_undefined ()`. Fix this by making the caller, `ada_discrete_type_high_bound`, consider that a range high bound could be of kind `PROP_UNDEFINED`, and return 0 in this case. I made the same change in ada_discrete_type_low_bound. I didn't encounter a problem with this function, but the same could in theory happen there. Returning 0 here is kind of a lie, but the goal here is just to restore the behavior of pre-8c2e4e0689ea24. The output of `maint print symbols` is: typedef <ada__exceptions__exception_data__append_info_basic_exception_information__TTnameSP1: range 1 .. 0; record ada__exceptions__exception_data__append_info_basic_exception_information__TTnameSP1: range 1 .. 0; end record; Instead of `1 .. 0`, which does not make sense, we could say something like `1 .. <dynamic>`. But that would require more changes than I'm willing to do at the moment. [1] https://www.adacore.com/download gdb/ChangeLog: PR ada/26235 * gdbtypes.c (ada_discrete_type_low_bound, ada_discrete_type_high_bound): Handle undefined bounds. Change-Id: Ia12167e61ef030941c0790f83294f3418e6a7c12
2020-07-21[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.reverse/solib-{precsave,reverse}.exp with gcc-8Tom de Vries3-6/+60
With gcc-8, we have the following FAILs, which are not there for gcc-7: ... FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step into solib function one FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step within solib function one FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step back to main one FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step into solib function two FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step within solib function two FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step back to main two FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: run until end part two FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-next over solib function one FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp: reverse-step into solib function one FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp: reverse-step within solib function one FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp: reverse-step back to main one FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp: reverse-step into solib function two FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp: reverse-step within solib function two FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp: reverse-step back to main two FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp: run until end part two FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp: reverse-next over solib function one ... Looking at the first FAIL for gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp, we have: ... (gdb) PASS: reverse-next first shr1 reverse-next^M 40 b[0] = 6; b[1] = 9; /* generic statement, end part two */^M (gdb) PASS: reverse-next generic reverse-step^M -shr2 (x=17) at gdb.reverse/shr2.c:23^M -23 }^M -(gdb) PASS: reverse-step into solib function one +38 b[1] = shr2(17); /* middle part two */^M +(gdb) FAIL: reverse-step into solib function one ... There's a difference in line number info for line 38, where for gcc-7 we have: ... Line number Starting address View Stmt 38 0x4005c6 x ... and for gcc-8: ... 38 0x4005c1 x 38 0x4005cb x ... which explains why we don't step directly into "solib function one". Fix this by recognizing the extra "recommended breakpoint location" and issuing an additional reverse-next/step. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-07-21 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: Handle additional "recommended breakpoint locations". * gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp: Same.
2020-07-21[gdb/testsuite] Fix step-reverse.c with gcc-10Tom de Vries2-1/+5
The file gdb.reverse/step-reverse.c is used in test-cases: - gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp - gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp - gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp With gcc-7, there are only PASSes (apart from one KFAIL), but with gcc-10, we have the following FAILs: ... FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp: reverse stepi from a function call \ (start statement) FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp: simple reverse stepi FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp: reverse step out of called fn FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp: reverse next over call FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp: reverse step test 1 FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp: reverse next test 1 FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp: reverse step test 2 FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp: reverse next test 2 FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: reverse stepi from a function call \ (start statement) FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: simple reverse stepi FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: reverse step out of called fn FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: reverse next over call FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: reverse step test 1 FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: reverse next test 1 FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: reverse step test 2 FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: reverse next test 2 ... Looking at the first step-precsave.exp FAIL, we have: ... (gdb) stepi^M 26 myglob++; return 0; /* ARRIVED IN CALLEE */^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: reverse stepi thru function return stepi^M 0x000000000040055f 26 myglob++; return 0; /* ARRIVED IN CALLEE */^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/step-precsave.exp: reverse stepi from a function call \ (start statement) ... There's a difference in line info for callee: ... 25 int callee() { /* ENTER CALLEE */ 26 myglob++; return 0; /* ARRIVED IN CALLEE */ 27 } /* RETURN FROM CALLEE */ ... between gcc-7: ... Line number Starting address View Stmt 25 0x400557 x 26 0x40055b x 27 0x40056f x ... and gcc-10: ... 25 0x400552 x 26 0x400556 x 26 0x400565 x 27 0x40056a x ... The two "recommend breakpoint location" entries at line 26 are for the two statements ("myglob++" and "return 0"), but the test-case expects to hit line 26 only once. Fix this by rewriting the two statements into a single statement: ... - myglob++; return 0; /* ARRIVED IN CALLEE */ + return myglob++; /* ARRIVED IN CALLEE */ ... Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-07-21 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.reverse/step-reverse.c (callee): Merge statements.
2020-07-21Enable multi-process mode in the NetBSD native target.Kamil Rytarowski3-0/+16
This enables proper support for multiple inferiors and ptrace(2) assisted management of the inferior processes and their threads. (gdb) info inferior Num Description Connection Executable * 1 process 14952 1 (native) /usr/bin/dig 2 <null> 1 (native) 3 process 25684 1 (native) /bin/ls 4 <null> 1 (native) /bin/ls Without this patch, additional inferiors can be added, but not properly controlled. gdb/ChangeLog: * nbsd-nat.h (nbsd_nat_target::supports_multi_process): New declaration. * nbsd-nat.c (nbsd_nat_target::supports_multi_process): New function.
2020-07-21[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.fortran/info-modules.exp with gcc-8Tom de Vries2-2/+7
When using test-case gdb.fortran/info-modules.exp with gcc 8.4.0, I run into: ... FAIL: gdb.fortran/info-modules.exp: info module variables: check for entry \ 'info-types.f90', '35', 'Type m1t1 mod1::__def_init_mod1_M1t1;' FAIL: gdb.fortran/info-modules.exp: info module variables: check for entry \ 'info-types.f90', '35', 'Type __vtype_mod1_M1t1 mod1::__vtab_mod1_M1t1;' ... This is caused by this change in gdb output: ... (gdb) info module variables ... File gdb.fortran/info-types.f90: -35: Type m1t1 mod1::__def_init_mod1_M1t1; + Type m1t1 mod1::__def_init_mod1_M1t1; -35: Type __vtype_mod1_M1t1 mod1::__vtab_mod1_M1t1; + Type __vtype_mod1_M1t1 mod1::__vtab_mod1_M1t1; 21: real(kind=4) mod1::mod1_var_1; 22: integer(kind=4) mod1::mod1_var_2; ... caused by a change in debug info. Fix this by allowing those entries without line number. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-07-21 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.fortran/info-modules.exp (info module variables): Allow missing line numbers for some variables.
2020-07-21[gdb/testsuite] Make inline-locals.c deterministicTom de Vries3-1/+16
When running testcase gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp on openSUSE Tumbleweed, I get: ... (gdb) info locals^M array = {0 <repeats 48 times>, 15775231, 0, 194, 0, -11497, 32767, 4199061, \ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4198992, 0, 4198432, 0}^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: info locals above bar 2 ... Fix this by: - completely initializing array before printing any value - updating the pattern to match "array = {0 <repeats 64 times>}" Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-07-21 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.opt/inline-locals.c (init_array): New func. (func1): Use init_array. * gdb.opt/inline-locals.exp: Update pattern.
2020-07-21[gdb/testsuite] Don't leak env vars in gdb.debuginfod/fetch_src_and_symbols.expTom de Vries2-89/+125
Test-case gdb.debuginfod/fetch_src_and_symbols.exp leaks env vars DEBUGINFOD_URLS, DEBUGINFOD_TIMEOUT and DEBUGINFOD_CACHE_PATH, causing timeouts in subsequent tests. Fix this by using save_vars. Also, fix PATH and DUPLICATE errors. Finally, cleanup whitespace. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-07-21 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.debuginfod/fetch_src_and_symbols.exp: Use save_vars for env vars. Fix PATH and DUPLICATE errors. Cleanup whitespace.
2020-07-20Implement the skip_solib_resolver gdbarch hook for FreeBSD architectures.John Baldwin4-0/+44
The ELF runtime linker on all FreeBSD architectures uses the "_rtld_bind" entry point for unresolved PTL entries. FreeBSD/mips has an additional entry point called "_mips_rtld_bind". gdb/ChangeLog: * fbsd-tdep.c (fbsd_skip_solib_resolver): New function. (fbsd_init_abi): Install gdbarch "skip_solib_resolver" method. * fbsd-tdep.h (fbsd_skip_solib_resolver): New prototype. * mips-fbsd-tdep.c (mips_fbsd_skip_solib_resolver): New function. (mips_fbsd_init_abi): Install gdbarch "skip_solib_resolver" method.
2020-07-20guile: Add support for Guile 3.0.Ludovic Courtès10-10/+29
gdb/ChangeLog 2020-06-28 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> * guile/scm-math.c (vlscm_integer_fits_p): Use 'uintmax_t' and 'intmax_t' instead of 'scm_t_uintmax' and 'scm_t_intmax', which are deprecated in Guile 3.0. * configure.ac (try_guile_versions): Add "guile-3.0". * configure (try_guile_versions): Regenerate. * NEWS: Update entry. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2020-06-28 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> * gdb.guile/source2.scm: Add #f first argument to 'format'. * gdb.guile/types-module.exp: Remove "ERROR:" from regexps since Guile 3.0 no longer prints that. gdb/doc/ChangeLog 2020-06-28 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> * doc/guile.texi (Guile Introduction): Mention Guile 3.0. Change-Id: Iff116c2e40f334e4e0ca4e759a097bfd23634679