aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-07-30Don't declare tui_copy_win or tui_box_winTom Tromey2-2/+5
tui_copy_win and tui_box_win are not implemented, so don't declare them. gdb/ChangeLog 2019-07-16 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * tui/tui-wingeneral.h (tui_copy_win, tui_box_win): Don't declare.
2019-07-30Allow nested function displaysTom Tromey7-4/+113
In Ada, it's possible to have nested functions. However, block.c:contained_in does not recognize this. Normally, this is no problem, but if gdb is stopped inside a nested function, then you can end up in the unexpected situation that "print" of an expression will work, whereas "display" of the same expression will not -- because contained_in returns 0. This patch simply removes the BLOCK_FUNCTION check from contained_in. The rationale here is that in languages without nested functions, this will not cause any issues. gdb/ChangeLog 2019-07-30 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> * block.c (contained_in): Remove BLOCK_FUNCTION check. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-30 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> * gdb.ada/display_nested.exp: New file. * gdb.ada/display_nested/foo.adb: New file. * gdb.ada/display_nested/pack.adb: New file. * gdb.ada/display_nested/pack.ads: New file.
2019-07-30Allow display of negative offsets in print_address_symbolic()Kevin Buettner2-6/+8
When examining addresses associated with blocks with non-contiguous address ranges, it's not uncommon to see large positive offsets which, for some address width, actually represent a smaller negative offset. Here's an example taken from the test case (using the dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold executable): (gdb) x/5i foo_cold 0x40110d <foo+4294967277>: push %rbp 0x40110e <foo+4294967278>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x401111 <foo+4294967281>: callq 0x401106 <baz> 0x401116 <foo+4294967286>: nop 0x401117 <foo+4294967287>: pop %rbp This commit, in conjuction with an earlier patch from this series, causes cases like the above to be displayed like this (below) instead: (gdb) x/5i foo_cold 0x40110d <foo_cold>: push %rbp 0x40110e <foo-18>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x401111 <foo-15>: callq 0x401106 <baz> 0x401116 <foo-10>: nop 0x401117 <foo-9>: pop %rbp Note that the address of foo_cold is now (due to another patch) being displayed as <foo_cold> instead of <foo+BigOffset>. The subsequent lines are shown as negative offsets from foo. Disassembly using the "disassemble" command is somewhat affected by these changes: Before: (gdb) disassemble foo_cold Dump of assembler code for function foo: Address range 0x401120 to 0x40113b: 0x0000000000401120 <+0>: push %rbp 0x0000000000401121 <+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x0000000000401124 <+4>: callq 0x401119 <bar> 0x0000000000401129 <+9>: mov 0x2ef1(%rip),%eax # 0x404020 <e> 0x000000000040112f <+15>: test %eax,%eax 0x0000000000401131 <+17>: je 0x401138 <foo+24> 0x0000000000401133 <+19>: callq 0x40110d <foo+4294967277> 0x0000000000401138 <+24>: nop 0x0000000000401139 <+25>: pop %rbp 0x000000000040113a <+26>: retq Address range 0x40110d to 0x401119: 0x000000000040110d <+-19>: push %rbp 0x000000000040110e <+-18>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x0000000000401111 <+-15>: callq 0x401106 <baz> 0x0000000000401116 <+-10>: nop 0x0000000000401117 <+-9>: pop %rbp 0x0000000000401118 <+-8>: retq End of assembler dump. After: (gdb) disassemble foo_cold Dump of assembler code for function foo: Address range 0x401120 to 0x40113b: 0x0000000000401120 <+0>: push %rbp 0x0000000000401121 <+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x0000000000401124 <+4>: callq 0x401119 <bar> 0x0000000000401129 <+9>: mov 0x2ef1(%rip),%eax # 0x404020 <e> 0x000000000040112f <+15>: test %eax,%eax 0x0000000000401131 <+17>: je 0x401138 <foo+24> 0x0000000000401133 <+19>: callq 0x40110d <foo_cold> 0x0000000000401138 <+24>: nop 0x0000000000401139 <+25>: pop %rbp 0x000000000040113a <+26>: retq Address range 0x40110d to 0x401119: 0x000000000040110d <-19>: push %rbp 0x000000000040110e <-18>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x0000000000401111 <-15>: callq 0x401106 <baz> 0x0000000000401116 <-10>: nop 0x0000000000401117 <-9>: pop %rbp 0x0000000000401118 <-8>: retq End of assembler dump. Note that negative offsets are now displayed without the leading "+". Also, the callq to foo_cold is now displayed as such instead of a callq to foo with a large positive offset. gdb/ChangeLog: * printcmd.c (print_address_symbolic): Print negative offsets. (build_address_symbolic): Force signed arithmetic when computing offset.
2019-07-30[PR/24474] Add gdb.lookup_static_symbol to the python APIChristian Biesinger10-0/+116
Similar to lookup_global_symbol, except that it checks the STATIC_SCOPE. gdb/ChangeLog: 2019-07-30 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> PR/24474: Add a function to lookup static variables. * NEWS: Mention this new function. * python/py-symbol.c (gdbpy_lookup_static_symbol): New function. * python/python-internal.h (gdbpy_lookup_static_symbol): New function. * python/python.c (python_GdbMethods): Add new function. gdb/doc/ChangeLog: 2019-07-30 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> * python.texi (Symbols In Python): Document new function gdb.lookup_static_symbol. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-30 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> * gdb.python/py-symbol.c: Add a static variable and one in an anonymous namespace. * gdb.python/py-symbol.exp: Test gdb.lookup_static_symbol.
2019-07-30Add missing changelog entryChristian Biesinger1-0/+4
I forgot to commit the change before pushing commit 25ec8924842a215e7f684d3a5076607409ac822f
2019-07-30[gdb/testsuite] Work around tcl bug in libsegfault.exp with check-read1Tom de Vries2-1/+10
When running libsegfault.exp with check-read1, I get: ... Running gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/libsegfault.exp ... ERROR: tcl error sourcing gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/libsegfault.exp. ERROR: no such variable (read trace on "env(LD_PRELOAD)") invoked from within "set env(LD_PRELOAD)" ("uplevel" body line 1) invoked from within "uplevel 1 [list set $var]" invoked from within "if [uplevel 1 [list array exists $var]] { set saved_arrays($var) [uplevel 1 [list array get $var]] } else { set saved_scalars($var) [uplevel ..." invoked from within "if [uplevel 1 [list info exists $var]] { if [uplevel 1 [list array exists $var]] { set saved_arrays($var) [uplevel 1 [list array get $var]] ..." (procedure "save_vars" line 11) invoked from within "save_vars { env(LD_PRELOAD) } { if { ![info exists env(LD_PRELOAD) ] || $env(LD_PRELOAD) == "" } { set env(LD_PRELOAD) "$lib" } else { ..." (procedure "gdb_spawn_with_ld_preload" line 4) invoked from within "gdb_spawn_with_ld_preload $libsegfault """ ... There are several things here interacting with environment variable LD_PRELOAD: - the expect "binary" build/gdb/testsuite/expect-read1 with does export LD_PRELOAD=build/gdb/testsuite/read1.so before calling native expect - read1.so which does unsetenv ("LD_PRELOAD") upon first call to read - the test-case, which wants to set or append libSegFault.so to LD_PRELOAD The error occurs when accessing $env(LD_PRELOAD), in a branch where "info exists env(LD_PRELOAD)" returns true. AFAIU, this is https://core.tcl-lang.org/tcl/tktview?name=67fd4f973a "incorrect results of 'info exists' when unset env var in one interp and check for existence from another interp". Work around the tcl bug by not unsetting the variable, but setting it to "" instead: ... - unsetenv ("LD_PRELOAD"); + setenv ("LD_PRELOAD", "", 1); ... Verified that reverting commit de28a3b72e "[gdb/testsuite, 2/2] Fix gdb.linespec/explicit.exp with check-read1" reintroduced the check-read1 failure in gdb.linespec/explicit.exp. This fixes a similar error in attach-slow-waitpid.exp, which also sets LD_PRELOAD. Tested on x86_64-linux with check-read1. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-30 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * lib/read1.c (read): Don't use unsetenv (v), use setenv (v, "", 1) instead.
2019-07-30[gdb/testsuite] Fail in gdb_compile if nopie results in PIE executableTom de Vries2-0/+24
When running gdb.base/dump.exp with --target_board=unix/-fPIE/-pie, we get: ... Running gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dump.exp ... FAIL: gdb.base/dump.exp: dump array as value, intel hex ... The FAIL happens because although the test specifies nopie, the exec is in fact compiled as PIE. The "-fPIE -pie" options specified using the target_board are interpreted by dejagnu as multilib_flags, and end up overriding the nopie flags. Fix this by checking in gdb_compile if the resulting exec is PIE despite of a nopie setting, and if so return an error: ... Running gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dump.exp ... gdb compile failed, nopie failed to prevent PIE executable === gdb Summary === nr of untested testcases 1 ... Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-30 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR testsuite/24834 * lib/gdb.exp (gdb_compile): Fail if nopie results in PIE executable. (exec_is_pie): New proc.
2019-07-29Fix misspelling (nonexistant -> nonexistent)Christian Biesinger1-2/+2
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> * gdb.python/py-objfile.exp: Fix misspelling (nonexistant -> nonexistent)
2019-07-29Add Objfile.lookup_{global,static}_symbol functionsChristian Biesinger8-0/+133
This is essentially the inverse of Symbol.objfile. This allows handling different symbols with the same name (but from different objfiles) and can also be faster if the objfile is known. gdb/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> * NEWS: Mention new functions Objfile.lookup_{global,static}_symbol. * python/py-objfile.c (objfpy_lookup_global_symbol): New function. (objfpy_lookup_static_symbol): New function. (objfile_object_methods): Add new functions. gdb/doc/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> * python.texi (Objfiles In Python): Document new functions Objfile.lookup_{global,static}_symbol. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> * gdb.python/py-objfile.c: Add global and static vars. * gdb.python/py-objfile.exp: Test new functions Objfile. lookup_global_symbol and lookup_static_symbol.
2019-07-29Two fixes for test suite's terminalTom Tromey2-1/+31
Exactly which escape sequences are emitted by gdb in TUI mode are determined largely by the curses implementation. Testing my latest (as yet unsubmitted) series to refactor the TUI showed a couple of failures that I tracked to the test suite's terminal implementation. In particular, the CSI "@" sequence was not implemented; and the CSI "X" sequence was implemented incorrectly. This patch fixes both of these problems. Tested on x86-64 Fedora 28. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-29 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * lib/tuiterm.exp (Term::_csi_@): New proc. (Term::_csi_X): Don't move cursor.
2019-07-29Document 'set print frame-info|frame-arguments presence'.Philippe Waroquiers4-3/+93
gdb/ChangeLog 2019-06-19 Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> * NEWS: Mention 'set|show print frame-info'. Mention new 'presence' value for 'frame-arguments'. Mention new '-frame-info' backtrace argument. Mention that python frame filtering code is now consistent with what 'backtrace' command prints. gdb/doc/ChangeLog 2019-07-29 Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> * gdb.texinfo (Backtrace): Document the new '-frame-info' backtrace option. Reference 'set print frame-info'. (Print Settings): Document 'set|show print frame-info'. Document new 'presence' value for 'set print frame-arguments.
2019-07-29Test 'set print frame-info|frame-arguments presence'.Philippe Waroquiers5-5/+144
Updated tests to test the new options and new values. Test the default for print_what in python frame filtering. Updated the tests impacted by the default in python frame filtering which is now consistent with the backtrace command. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-29 Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> * gdb.base/options.exp: Update backtrace - completion to new option -frame-info. * gdb.base/frame-args.exp: Test new 'frame-arguments presence'. Test new 'set print frame-info'. Test backtrace -frame-info overriding 'set print frame-info'. * gdb.python/py-framefilter.exp: Test new 'frame-arguments presence'. Test new 'set print frame-info'. Verify consistency of backtrace with and without filters, with and without -no-filters. * gdb.python/py-framefilter-invalidarg.exp: Update to new print_what default.
2019-07-29Implement 'set print frame-info|frame-arguments presence'.Philippe Waroquiers6-40/+263
New settings allow to better control what frame information is printed. 'set print frame-info' allows to override the default frame information printed when a GDB command prints a frame. The backtrace command has a new option -frame-info to override this global setting. It is now possible to have very short frame information by using the new 'set print frame-arguments presence' and 'set print frame-info short-location'. Combined with 'set print address off', a backtrace will only show the essential information to see the function call chain, e.g.: (gdb) set print address off (gdb) set print frame-arguments presence (gdb) set print frame-info short-location (gdb) bt #0 break_me () #1 call_me (...) #2 main () (gdb) This is handy in particular for big backtraces with functions having many arguments. Python frame filter printing logic has been updated to respect the new setting in non MI mode. Also, the default frame information printed was inconsistent when backtrace was printing the frame information itself, or when the python frame filtering code was printing the frame information. This patch changes the default of python frame filtering to have a consistent behaviour regarding printed frame-information, whatever the presence/activity/matches of python filters. 2019-07-29 Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> * frame.h (enum print_what): New value 'SHORT_LOCATION', update comments. (print_frame_info_auto, print_frame_info_source_line, print_frame_info_location, print_frame_info_source_and_location, print_frame_info_location_and_address, print_frame_info_short_location): New declarations. (struct frame_print_options): New member print_frame_info. * extension.h (enum ext_lang_frame_args): New value CLI_PRESENCE. * stack.h (get_user_print_what_frame_info): New declaration. (frame_show_address): New declaration. * stack.c (print_frame_arguments_choices): New value 'presence'. (print_frame_info_auto, print_frame_info_source_line, print_frame_info_location, print_frame_info_source_and_location, print_frame_info_location_and_address, print_frame_info_short_location, print_frame_info_choices, print_frame_info_print_what): New definitions. (print_frame_args): Only print dots for args if print frame-arguments is 'presence'. (frame_print_option_defs): New element for "frame-info". (get_user_print_what_frame_info): New function. (frame_show_address): Make non static. Move comment to stack.h. (print_frame_info_to_print_what): New function. (print_frame_info): Update comment. Use fp_opts.print_frame_info to decide what to print. (backtrace_command_1): Handle the new print_frame_arguments_presence value. (_initialize_stack): Call add_setshow_enum_cmd for frame-info. * python/py-framefilter.c (py_print_args): Handle CLI_PRESENCE. (py_print_frame): In non-mi mode, use LOCATION as default for print_what, similarly to frame information printed directly by backtrace command. Handle frame-info user option in non MI mode.
2019-07-29[gdb/testsuite, 2/2] Fix gdb.linespec/explicit.exp with check-read1Tom de Vries2-1/+6
When running gdb.linespec/explicit.exp with check-read1, we get: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.linespec/explicit.exp: set max-completions unlimited break  -function ... top (gdb) PASS: gdb.linespec/explicit.exp: complete with no arguments break -function ... top (gdb) FAIL: gdb.linespec/explicit.exp: complete with no arguments (clearing input line) ... The problem is that the send_gdb "\t\t" triggers completion twice: ... set tst "complete with no arguments" send_gdb "break \t" gdb_test_multiple "" $tst { "break \\\x07" { send_gdb "\t\t" gdb_test_multiple "" $tst { ... } clear_input_line $tst ... but the following gdb_test_multiple only parses it once, so the second completion is left for clear_input_line, which fails. Fix this by triggering completion only once. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.linespec/explicit.exp: Fix completion trigger for "complete with no arguments".
2019-07-29[gdb/testsuite, 1/2] Fix gdb.linespec/explicit.exp with check-read1Tom de Vries2-14/+6
When running gdb.linespec/explicit.exp with check-read1, we get: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.linespec/explicit.exp: complete unique file name: break -source "3explicit.c" break -source exp^Glicit^G^M explicit.c explicit2.c ^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.linespec/explicit.exp: complete non-unique file name ... The problem is that we have a gdb_test_multiple where we match two regexps: ... set tst "complete non-unique file name" send_gdb "break -source exp\t" gdb_test_multiple "" $tst { -re "break -source exp\\\x07licit" { ... } -re "break -source exp\\\x07l" { # This pattern may occur when glibc debuginfo is installed. ... } } ... but since second is a substring of the first, we'll usually match the first, but with check-read1 we'll match the second. Fix this by using a single regexp and merging the related code. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.linespec/explicit.exp: Fix gdb_test_multiple regexps where second is a substring of the first for "complete non-unique file name".
2019-07-29[gdb/testsuite] Fix python.exp with check-read1Tom de Vries2-2/+7
when running python/python.exp with check-read1, we get: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.python/python.exp: prompt substitution readline - end python gdb.prompt_hook = error_prompt^M Python Exception <type 'exceptions.RuntimeError'> Python exception calledPASS: gdb.python/python.exp: set hook : ^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.python/python.exp: set the hook to default python gdb.prompt_hook = None^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.python/python.exp: set print-stack full for prompt error test set python print-stack full^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/python.exp: set the hook python gdb.prompt_hook = error_prompt^M Traceback (most recent call last):^M File "<string>", line 3, in error_prompt^M RuntimeError: Python exception called^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/python.exp: set the hook to default ... The problem is that gdb_test_multiple here: ... gdb_test_multiple "python gdb.prompt_hook = error_prompt" "set the hook" { -re "Python Exception (exceptions.RuntimeError|<(type 'exceptions.|class ')RuntimeError'>) Python excepti on called.*" { pass "set hook" } } ... specifies a regexp that ends with ".*" but doesn't specify the expected $gdb_prompt. Consequently, due to check-read1, the ".*" is matched to "" and the remaining $gdb_prompt is read by the the following gdb_py_test_silent_cmd, which has its own $gdb_prompt read by the following gdb_py_test_silent_cmd, which has its own $gdb_prompt causing a mismatch for the following gdb_test_multiple: ... gdb_test_multiple "python gdb.prompt_hook = error_prompt" "set the hook" { -re "Traceback.*File.*line.*RuntimeError.*Python exception called.*" { pass "set hook" } } ... which causes both FAILs. The second gdb_test_multiple has the same problem as the first, but it happens not to cause a FAIL because it's followed by a gdb_py_test_silent_cmd and a clean_restart. Fix the regexps in both gdb_test_multiple calls. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.python/python.exp: Don't terminate gdb_test_multiple regexp with ".*".
2019-07-29[gdb/testsuite] Fix mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.exp and mi-nonstop.exp with ↵Tom de Vries2-2/+7
check-read1 With check-read1 we get: ... FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.exp: check for stap probe in libstdc++ FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-nonstop.exp: probe for target remote ... In both cases this is due to using gdb_test_multiple (which expects $gdb_prompt by default) in combination with gdb using $gdb_mi_prompt, similar to the problem fixed by commit d17725d72f "Don't expect gdb_prompt in mi_skip_python_test". Fix this by adding the $prompt_regexp argument to the gdb_test_multiple calls. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * lib/gdb.exp (skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests_prompt, gdb_is_target_1): Pass prompt_regexp parameter to gdb_test_multiple calls.
2019-07-29[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/maint.exp with check-read1Tom de Vries2-3/+8
With gdb.base/maint.exp and check-read1, we get: ... FAIL: gdb.base/maint.exp: maint print registers ... Using this patch: ... diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint.exp index a7675ea215..b81d7ec660 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint.exp @@ -81,7 +81,9 @@ gdb_test_multiple $test $test { exp_continue } -re "$gdb_prompt $" { - gdb_assert { $saw_registers && $saw_headers } $test + gdb_assert { $saw_headers } "$test: saw headers" + gdb_assert { $saw_registers } "$test: saw registers" + pass "$test: got prompt" } } ... We get more information: ... PASS: gdb.base/maint.exp: maint print registers: saw headers FAIL: gdb.base/maint.exp: maint print registers: saw registers PASS: gdb.base/maint.exp: maint print registers: got prompt ... The problem is that when matching: ... (gdb) maint print registers^M Name Nr Rel Offset Size Type ^M rax 0 0 0 8 int64_t ^M ... the regexp for $saw_headers ends in "\[\r\n\]+", which allows it to match only the "\r". The remaining "\n" then start the next line to be matched, which doesn't match for the $saw_registers regexp since it starts with "^\[^\r\n\]+". Fix this by ending the regexps with "\r\n". Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.base/maint.exp: Use "\r\n" instead of "\[\r\n\]+" in "maint print registers" regexps.
2019-07-29[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/define.exp with check-read1Tom de Vries2-1/+5
When running gdb.base/define.exp with check-read1, we get: ... show prompt^M Gdb's prompt is "(gdb) ".^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/define.exp: save gdb_prompt set prompt \(blah\) ^M (blah) PASS: gdb.base/define.exp: set gdb_prompt set prompt (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/define.exp: reset gdb_prompt ^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/define.exp: define do-define ... The problem is that the "$gdb_prompt $" regexp here: ... gdb_test_multiple "set prompt $prior_prompt " "reset gdb_prompt" { -re "$gdb_prompt $" { pass "reset gdb_prompt" } } ... triggers for the echoing of the command "set prompt $prior_prompt " rather than for the prompt after the command has executed. Fix this by changing the regexp to "\r\n$gdb_prompt $". Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.base/define.exp: Add "\r\n" to "reset gdb_prompt" regexp.
2019-07-29[gdb/testsuite] Don't expect gdb_prompt in mi_skip_python_testTom de Vries2-13/+26
When running gdb.python/py-mi-events.exp with make check-read1, we get: ... (gdb) ^M python print ('test')^M &"python print ('test')\n"^M ~"test\n"^M ^done^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/py-mi-events.exp: verify python support ^M python print (sys.version_info[0])^M &"python print (sys.version_info[0])\n"^M ~"2\n"^M ^done^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/py-mi-events.exp: check if python 3 ^M ... The FAILs happen as follows. On one hand, skip_python_tests_prompt uses the prompt_regexp parameter for the user_code argument of gdb_test_multiple: ... proc skip_python_tests_prompt { prompt_regexp } { global gdb_py_is_py3k gdb_test_multiple "python print ('test')" "verify python support" { -re "not supported.*$prompt_regexp" { unsupported "Python support is disabled." return 1 } -re "$prompt_regexp" {} } gdb_test_multiple "python print (sys.version_info\[0\])" "check if python 3" { -re "3.*$prompt_regexp" { set gdb_py_is_py3k 1 } -re ".*$prompt_regexp" { set gdb_py_is_py3k 0 } } ... On the other hand, gdb_test_multiple itself uses $gdb_prompt: ... -re "\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { if ![string match "" $message] then { fail "$message" } set result 1 } ... So when mi_skip_python_test calls skip_python_tests_prompt with prompt_regexp set to $mi_gdb_prompt: ... proc mi_skip_python_tests {} { global mi_gdb_prompt return [skip_python_tests_prompt "$mi_gdb_prompt$"] } ... and expect reads "(gdb) " and tries to match it (due to the READ1=1 setting), the user_code regexps using $prompt_regexp (set to $mi_gdb_prompt) don't match, but the $gdb_prompt regexp in gdb_test_multiple does match. Fix this by adding a prompt_regexp parameter to gdb_test_multiple, and using the parameter in skip_python_tests_prompt. Tested gdb.python/py-mi-events.exp with make check READ1=1 x86_64-linux. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-29 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR gdb/24855 * lib/gdb.exp (gdb_test_multiple): Add prompt_regexp parameter. (skip_python_tests_prompt): Add prompt_regexp argument to gdb_test_multiple calls.
2019-07-27Add test that "file" shows "main"Tom Tromey2-0/+38
This adds a new test that checks that the "file" command will show the program's "main". gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-27 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * gdb.tui/main.exp: New file.
2019-07-27Add test case for empty TUI windowsTom Tromey3-3/+117
My original intent here was to add a test case to test that empty TUI windows re-render their contents after a resize. However, this seems pretty broken at the moment, so a lot of the test is actually disabled. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-27 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * lib/tuiterm.exp (Term::clean_restart): Make "executable" optional. * gdb.tui/empty.exp: New file.
2019-07-27Add TUI resizing testTom Tromey3-0/+93
This adds a test case that resizes the terminal and then checks that the TUI updates properly. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-27 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * lib/tuiterm.exp (spawn): New proc. (Term::resize): New proc. * gdb.tui/resize.exp: New file.
2019-07-27Add TUI test for "list"Tom Tromey2-0/+41
This adds a test to check that the "list" command will update the TUI source window. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-27 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * gdb.tui/list.exp: New file.
2019-07-27Add TUI register window testTom Tromey2-0/+52
This adds a very simple test of the TUI register window. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-27 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * gdb.tui/regs.exp: New file.
2019-07-27Add "layout split" testTom Tromey2-0/+13
This adds a test of "layout split" to the TUI test suite. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-27 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * gdb.tui/basic.exp: Add "layout split" test.
2019-07-27Add test for "layout asm"Tom Tromey2-0/+9
This adds a very simple test for "layout asm". gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-27 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * gdb.tui/basic.exp: Add "layout asm" test.
2019-07-27A virtual terminal for the test suiteTom Tromey3-0/+572
This patch implements a simple ANSI terminal emulator for the test suite. It is still quite basic, but it is good enough to allow some simple TUI testing to be done. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-27 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * lib/tuiterm.exp: New file. * gdb.tui/basic.exp: New file.
2019-07-27Fix gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp failures for -m32 multilibKevin Buettner2-7/+18
This patch fixes the following failures when testing with "target_board unix/-m32" using a x86_64-pc-linux-gnu native GDB. FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: print thread for bogus handle thrs[3] FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: print thread for bogus handle thrs[4] FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: print thread id for thrs[0] FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: print thread id for thrs[1] FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: print thread id for thrs[2] FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: thread 0: fetch thread handle from thread FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: thread 0: verify that handles are the same FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: thread 1: fetch thread handle from thread FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: thread 1: verify that handles are the same FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: thread 2: fetch thread handle from thread FAIL: gdb.python/py-thrhandle.exp: thread 2: verify that handles are the same I've written it so that it might work for other 64-bit host / 32-bit target combos too. gdb/ChangeLog: * linux-thread-db.c (thread_db_target::thread_handle_to_thread_info): Add case for debugging 32-bit target on 64-bit host. Revise comment.
2019-07-27Fix stepping bug associated with non-contiguous blocksKevin Buettner4-23/+62
I recently noticed the following behavior while debugging dw2-ranges-func-low-cold. This is one of the test programs associated with the test gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp. (gdb) b 70 Breakpoint 1 at 0x401129: file dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold.c, line 70. (gdb) run Starting program: dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold Breakpoint 1, foo () at dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold.c:70 70 if (e) foo_cold (); /* foo foo_cold call */ (gdb) set var e=1 (gdb) step [Inferior 1 (process 12545) exited normally] This is incorrect. When stepping, we expect a step to occur. We do not expect the program to exit. Instead, we should see the following behavior: ... (gdb) set var e=1 (gdb) step foo () at dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold.c:54 54 baz (); /* foo_cold baz call */ (Note that I've shortened the paths in the above sessions to improve readability.) The bug is in fill_in_stop_func() in infrun.c. While working on non-contiguous address range improvements in 2018, I replaced the call to find_pc_partial_function() with a call to find_function_entry_range_from_pc(). Although this seemed like the right thing to do at the time, I now think that calling find_pc_partial_function (along with some other tweaks) is the right thing to do. For blocks with a single contiguous range, these functions do pretty much the same thing: when the function succeeds, the function name, start address, and end address are all filled in. Additionally, find_pc_partial_function contains an additional output parameter which is set to the block containing that PC. For blocks with non-contiguous ranges, find_pc_partial_function sets the start and end addresses to the start and end addresses of the range containing the pc. find_function_entry_range_from_pc does what it says; it sets the start and end addresses to those of the range containing the entry pc. The reason that I had thought that using the entry pc range was correct is due to the fact that fill_in_stop_func() contains some code for advancing past the function start and entry point. To do this, we'd need the range that contains the entry pc. However, when stepping, we actually want the range that contains the stop pc. If that range also contains the entry pc, we should then attempt to advance stop_func_start past the start offset and entry point. (I haven't thought very hard about the reason for advancing the stop_func_start in this manner. Since it's been there for quite a while, I'm assuming that it's still a good idea.) Back when I wrote the test case, I had included a test for doing the step shown in the example above. I had problems with it, however. At the time, I thought it was due to differing compiler versions, so I disabled that portion of the test. I have now reenabled those tests, but have left in place the logic which may be used to disable it. The changes to dw2-ranges-func.exp depend on my other recent changes to the file which have not been pushed yet. Finally, I'll note that the only caller of find_function_entry_range_from_pc() is/was fill_in_stop_func(). Once this commit goes in, it'll be dead code. I considered removing it, but I think that it ought to be used (instead of find_pc_partial_function) for determining the correct range to scan for prologue analysis, so I'm going to leave it in place for now. gdb/ChangeLog: * infrun.c (fill_in_stop_func): Use find_pc_partial_function instead of find_function_entry_range_from_pc. testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp (enable_foo_cold_stepping): Enable tests associated with this flag. Adjust regex referencing "foo_low" to now refer to "foo_cold" instead.
2019-07-27Improve test gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.expKevin Buettner4-339/+495
The original dw2-ranges-func.exp test caused a function named foo to be created with two non-contiguous address ranges. In the C source file, a function named foo_low was incorporated into the function foo which was also defined in that file. The DWARF assembler is used to do this manipulation. The source file had been laid out so that foo_low would likely be placed (by the compiler and linker) at a lower address than foo(). The case where a range at a higher set of addresses (than foo) was not being tested. In a recent discussion on gdb-patches, it became clear that performing such tests are desirable because bugs were discovered which only became evident when the other range was located at high(er) addresses than the range containing the entry point for the function. This other (non entry pc) address range is typically used for "cold" code which executes less frequently. Thus, I renamed foo_low to foo_cold and renamed the C source file from dw-ranges-func.c to dw-ranges-func-lo.c. I then made a copy of this file, naming it dw-ranges-func-hi.c. (That was my intent anyway. According to git, I renamed dw-ranges-func.c to dw-ranges-func-hi.c and then modified it. dw-ranges-func-lo.c shows up as an entirely new file.) Within dw-ranges-func-hi.c, I changed the placement of foo_cold() along with some of the other functions so that foo_cold() would be at a higher address than foo() while also remaining non-contiguous. The two files, dw-ranges-func-lo.c and dw-ranges-func-hi.c, are essentially the same except for the placement of some of the functions therein. The tests in dw2-ranges-func.exp where then wrapped in a new proc named do_test which was then called in a loop from the outermost level. The loop causes each of the source files to have the same tests run upon them. I also added a few new tests which test functionality fixed by the other commits to this patch series. Due to the reorganization of the file, it's hard to identify these changes in the patch. So, here are the tests which were added: with_test_prefix "no-cold-names" { # Due to the calling sequence, this backtrace would normally # show function foo_cold for frame #1. However, we don't want # this to be the case due to placing it in the same block # (albeit at a different range) as foo. Thus it is correct to # see foo for frames #1 and #2. It is incorrect to see # foo_cold at frame #1. gdb_test_sequence "bt" "backtrace from baz" { "\[\r\n\]#0 .*? baz \\(\\) " "\[\r\n\]#1 .*? foo \\(\\) " "\[\r\n\]#2 .*? foo \\(\\) " "\[\r\n\]#3 .*? main \\(\\) " } # Doing x/2i foo_cold should show foo_cold as the first symbolic # address and an offset from foo for the second. We also check to # make sure that the offset is not too large - we don't GDB to # display really large offsets that would (try to) wrap around the # address space. set foo_cold_offset 0 set test "x/2i foo_cold" gdb_test_multiple $test $test { -re " (?:$hex) <foo_cold>.*?\n (?:$hex) <foo\[+-\](\[0-9\]+)>.*${gdb_prompt}" { set foo_cold_offset $expect_out(1,string) pass $test } } gdb_assert {$foo_cold_offset <= 10000} "offset to foo_cold is not too large" # Likewise, verify that second address shown by "info line" is at # and offset from foo instead of foo_cold. gdb_test "info line *foo_cold" "starts at address $hex <foo_cold> and ends at $hex <foo\[+-\].*?>.*" } When run against a GDB without the requisite bug fixes (from this patch series), these 6 failures should be seen: FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp: lo-cold: no-cold-names: backtrace from baz (pattern 4) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp: lo-cold: no-cold-names: x/2i foo_cold FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp: lo-cold: no-cold-names: info line *foo_cold FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp: hi-cold: no-cold-names: backtrace from baz (pattern 3) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp: hi-cold: no-cold-names: x/2i foo_cold FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp: hi-cold: no-cold-names: info line *foo_cold gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.c: Rename to... * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold.c: ...this. * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold.c (foo_low): Change name to foo_cold. Revise comments to match. * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func-hi-cold.c: New file. * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp (do_test): New proc. Existing tests were wrapped into this proc; Call do_test in loop from outermost level. (foo_low): Rename all occurrences to "foo_cold". (backtrace from baz): New test. (x2/i foo_cold): New test. (info line *foo_cold): New test.
2019-07-27dwarf2-frame.c: Fix FDE processing bug involving non-contiguous rangesKevin Buettner2-1/+14
In the course of revising the test case for gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp, I added a new .c file which would cause the "cold" range to be at a higher address than the rest of the function. In these tests, the range in question isn't really cold in the sense that a compiler has determined that it'll be executed less frequently. Instead, it's simply the range that does not include the entry pc. These tests are intended to mimic the output of such a compiler, so I'll continue to refer to this range as "cold" in the following discussion. The original test case had only tested a cold range placed at lower addresses than the rest of the function. During testing of the new code where the cold range was placed at higher addresses, I found that I could produce the following backtrace: (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000401138 in baz () at dw2-ranges-func-hi-cold.c:72 #1 0x0000000000401131 in foo_cold () at dw2-ranges-func-hi-cold.c:64 #2 0x000000000040111e in foo () at dw2-ranges-func-hi-cold.c:50 #3 0x0000000000401144 in main () at dw2-ranges-func-hi-cold.c:78 This is correct, except that we'd like to see foo() listed instead of foo_cold(). (I handle that problem in another patch.) Now look at what happens for a similar backtrace where the cold range is at a lower address than the foo's entry pc: (gdb) bt #0 0x000000000040110a in baz () at dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold.c:48 #1 0x0000000000401116 in foo () at dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold.c:54 #2 0x00007fffffffd4c0 in ?? () #3 0x0000000000401138 in foo () at dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold.c:70 Note that the backtrace doesn't go all the way back to main(). Moreover, frame #2 is messed up. I had seen this behavior when I had worked on the non-contiguous address problem last year. At the time I convinced myself that the mangled backtrace was "okay" since we're doing strange things with the DWARF assembler. We're taking a function called foo_cold (though it was originally called foo_low - my recent changes to the test case changed the name) and via the magic of the DWARF assembler, we're combining it into a separate (non-contiguous) range for foo. Thus, it was a surprise to me when I got a good and complete backtrace when the cold symbol is placed at an address that's greater than entry pc. The function dwarf2_frame_cache (in dwarf2-frame.c) is making this call: if (get_frame_func_if_available (this_frame, &entry_pc)) ... If that call succeeds (returns a true value), the FDE is then processed up to the entry pc. It doesn't make sense to do this, however, when the FDE in question does not contain the entry pc. This can happen when the function in question is comprised of more than one (non-contiguous) address range. My fix is to add some comparisons to the test above to ensure that ENTRY_PC is within the address range covered by the FDE. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2-frame.c (dwarf2_frame_cache): Don't decode FDE instructions for entry pc when entry pc is out of range for that FDE.
2019-07-27Restrict use of minsym names when printing addresses in disassembled codeKevin Buettner4-16/+50
build_address_symbolic contains some code which causes it to prefer the minsym over the the function symbol in certain cases. The cases where this occurs are the same as the "certain pathological cases" that used to exist in find_frame_funname(). This commit largely disables that code; it will only prefer the minsym when the address of minsym is identical to that of the address under consideration AND the function address for the symbtab sym is not the same as the address under consideration. So, without this change, when using the dw2-ranges-func-lo-cold executable from the gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-func.exp test, GDB exhibits the following behavior: (gdb) x/5i foo_cold 0x40110d <foo+4294967277>: push %rbp 0x40110e <foo+4294967278>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x401111 <foo+4294967281>: callq 0x401106 <baz> 0x401116 <foo+4294967286>: nop 0x401117 <foo+4294967287>: pop %rbp On the other hand, still without this change, using the dw2-ranges-func-hi-cold executable from the same test, GDB does this instead: (gdb) x/5i foo_cold 0x401128 <foo_cold>: push %rbp 0x401129 <foo_cold+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x40112c <foo_cold+4>: callq 0x401134 <baz> 0x401131 <foo_cold+9>: nop 0x401132 <foo_cold+10>: pop %rbp This is inconsistent behavior. When foo_cold is at a lower address than the function's entry point, the symtab symbol (foo) is displayed along with a large positive offset which would wrap around the address space if the address space were only 32 bits wide. (A later patch fixes this problem by displaying negative offsets.) This commit makes the behavior uniform for both the "lo-cold" and "hi-cold" cases: lo-cold: (gdb) x/5i foo_cold 0x40110d <foo_cold>: push %rbp 0x40110e <foo-18>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x401111 <foo-15>: callq 0x401106 <baz> 0x401116 <foo-10>: nop 0x401117 <foo-9>: pop %rbp hi-cold: (gdb) x/5i foo_cold 0x401128 <foo_cold>: push %rbp 0x401129 <foo+35>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x40112c <foo+38>: callq 0x401134 <baz> 0x401131 <foo+43>: nop 0x401132 <foo+44>: pop %rbp In both cases, the symbol shown for the address at which foo_cold resides is shown as <foo_cold>. Subsequent offsets are shown as either negative or positive offsets from the entry pc for foo. When disassembling a function, care must be taken to NOT display <+0> as the offset for the second range. For this reason, I found it necessary to add the "prefer_sym_over_minsym" parameter to build_address_symbolic. The type of this flag is a bool; do_demangle ought to be a bool also, so I made this change at the same time. gdb/ChangeLog: * valprint.h (build_address_symbolic): Add "prefer_sym_over_minsym" parameter. Change type of "do_demangle" to bool. * disasm.c (gdb_pretty_print_disassembler::pretty_print_insn): Pass suitable "prefer_sym_over_minsym" flag to build_address_symbolic(). Don't output "+" for negative offsets. * printcmd.c (print_address_symbolic): Update invocation of build_address_symbolic to include a "prefer_sym_over_minsym" flag. (build_address_symbolic): Add "prefer_sym_over_minsym" parameter. Restrict cases in which use of minimal symbol is preferred to that of a found symbol. Update comments.
2019-07-27Prefer symtab symbol over minsym for function names in non-contiguous blocksKevin Buettner2-56/+20
The discussion on gdb-patches which led to this patch may be found here: https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-05/msg00018.html Here's a brief synopsis/analysis: Eli Zaretskii, while debugging a Windows emacs executable, found that functions comprised of more than one (non-contiguous) address range were not being displayed correctly in a backtrace. This is the example that Eli provided: (gdb) bt #0 0x76a63227 in KERNELBASE!DebugBreak () from C:\Windows\syswow64\KernelBase.dll #1 0x012e7b89 in emacs_abort () at w32fns.c:10768 #2 0x012e1f3b in print_vectorlike.cold () at print.c:1824 #3 0x011d2dec in print_object (obj=<optimized out>, printcharfun=XIL(0), escapeflag=true) at print.c:2150 The function print_vectorlike consists of two address ranges, one of which contains "cold" code which is expected to not execute very often. There is a minimal symbol, print_vectorlike.cold.65, which is the address of the "cold" range. GDB is prefering this minsym over the the name provided by the DWARF info due to some really old code in GDB which handles "certain pathological cases". This comment reads as follows: /* In certain pathological cases, the symtabs give the wrong function (when we are in the first function in a file which is compiled without debugging symbols, the previous function is compiled with debugging symbols, and the "foo.o" symbol that is supposed to tell us where the file with debugging symbols ends has been truncated by ar because it is longer than 15 characters). This also occurs if the user uses asm() to create a function but not stabs for it (in a file compiled with -g). So look in the minimal symbol tables as well, and if it comes up with a larger address for the function use that instead. I don't think this can ever cause any problems; there shouldn't be any minimal symbols in the middle of a function; if this is ever changed many parts of GDB will need to be changed (and we'll create a find_pc_minimal_function or some such). */ In an earlier version of this patch, I had left the code for the pathological case intact, but those who reviwed that patch recommended removing it. So that's what I've done - I've removed it. gdb/ChangeLog: * stack.c (find_frame_funname): Remove code which preferred minsym over symtab sym in "certain pathological cases".
2019-07-26Fix return type typo in obsd-nat.c that breaks build on OpenBSDBrian Callahan2-1/+7
To recap the bug report: Commit a068643 introduced a small typo that breaks the gdb build on OpenBSD. Line 38 of obsd-nat.c needs to be changed from std::sring to std::string. gdb/ChangeLog 2019-07-26 Brian Callahan <bcallah@openbsd.org> PR gdb/24839: * gdb/obsd-nat.c (obsd_nat_target::pid_to_str): Fix typo in return type.
2019-07-26[gdb/testsuite] Fix unterminated string in i386-pkru.expTom de Vries2-1/+5
I ran into this error: ... ERROR: tcl error sourcing gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-pkru.exp. ERROR: missing " while executing "untested "" invoked from within "if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} ${srcfile} \ [list debug additional_flags=${comp_flags}]] } { untested "failed to c..." (file "gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-pkru.exp" line 25) invoked from within ... caused by: ... untested "failed to compile x86 PKEYS test. ... Fix the unterminated string. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-26 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.arch/i386-pkru.exp: Fix unterminated string.
2019-07-25Fix comment about the signature of add_separate_debug_fileChristian Biesinger2-2/+8
Also fixes the date in the changelog of my last commit. gdb/ChangeLog: 2019-07-25 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> * python/py-objfile.c (add_separate_debug_file): Fix comment about this function's Python signature.
2019-07-25[gdb/testsuite] Test skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests in mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.expTom de Vries4-44/+88
On a system without SDT probes in libstdc++, we run into: ... FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.exp: all with invalid regexp: run until \ breakpoint in main (unknown output after running) ... The test-case uses a regexp argument for the catch throw/rethrow/catch command, which is only supported on systems with SDT probes in libstdc++. Fix this by marking the portions of the test-case that use a regexp argument as unsupported on a system without SDT probes. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-25 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR testsuite/24830 * gdb.mi/mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.exp: Call mi_skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests, and skip unsupported tests. * lib/gdb.exp (skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests_prompt): Factor out of ... (skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests): ... here. * lib/mi-support.exp (mi_skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests): New proc.
2019-07-24Allow passing a block to lookup_global_symbol_from_objfileChristian Biesinger6-5/+23
This has no behavior change in itself, but allows a future patch to add a function to the Python API to look up symbols in the static block. gdb/ChangeLog: 2019-07-24 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> * compile/compile-object-load.c (compile_object_load): Pass GLOBAL_SCOPE. * solib-spu.c (spu_lookup_lib_symbol): Pass GLOBAL_SCOPE. * solib-svr4.c (elf_lookup_lib_symbol): Pass GLOBAL_SCOPE. * symtab.c (lookup_global_symbol_from_objfile): Add a scope parameter. * symtab.h (lookup_global_symbol_from_objfile): Likewise.
2019-07-24[gdb/testsuite] Fix implicit declaration of printf in gdb.objc/*.mTom de Vries4-0/+10
When running gdb.objc/objcdecode.exp we get: ... objcdecode.m: In function '-[Decode multipleDef]': objcdecode.m:14:3: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in \ function 'printf' printf("method multipleDef\n"); ^~~~~~ objcdecode.m:14:3: note: include '<stdio.h>' or provide a declaration of \ 'printf' ... Fix this in the three gdb.objc/*.m test-cases by including stdio.h. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-24 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR testsuite/24807 * gdb.objc/basicclass.m: Include stdio.h. * gdb.objc/nondebug.m: Same. * gdb.objc/objcdecode.m: Same.
2019-07-24[gdb/testsuite] Fix infoline-reloc-main-from-zero.exp compilationTom de Vries2-1/+7
When running gdb.base/infoline-reloc-main-from-zero.exp, I see: ... Running gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infoline-reloc-main-from-zero.exp ... gdb compile failed, ld: infoline-reloc-main-from-zero: \ not enough room for program headers, try linking with -N ld: final link failed: bad value collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status UNTESTED: gdb.base/infoline-reloc-main-from-zero.exp: infoline-reloc-main-from-zero.exp UNTESTED: gdb.base/infoline-reloc-main-from-zero.exp: failed to compile ... Fix this by following the suggestion: ... -set opts {debug "additional_flags=-nostdlib -emain -Wl,-Ttext=0x00"} +set opts {debug "additional_flags=-nostdlib -emain -Wl,-Ttext=0x00 -Wl,-N"} ... Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-24 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR testsuite/24612 * gdb.base/infoline-reloc-main-from-zero.exp: Add -Wl,-N to additional_flags.
2019-07-24gdb/h8300-tdep.c: Fix register name in h8300h machine.Yoshinori Sato2-22/+42
H8/300H general register name "ER0" - "ER7". But gdb using "R0" - "R7". This changes register name "ER0" - "ER7" in h8300h machine mode. gdb/ChangeLog: * h8300-tdep.c (h8300_register_name_common): New. h8300_register_name): Use h8300_register_name_common. (h8300s_register_name): Likewise. (h8300sx_register_name): Likewise. (h8300h_register_nam): New. (h8300_gdbarch_init): Use h8300h_register_name in h8300h machine.
2019-07-24Update expected info threads error messages in gdb.multi/tids.expTom de Vries2-7/+19
We currently have these FAILs: ... FAIL: gdb.multi/tids.exp: two inferiors: info threads -1 FAIL: gdb.multi/tids.exp: two inferiors: info threads -$one ... because we're expecting: ... Invalid thread ID: -1 ... but instead we have: ... Unrecognized option at: -1 ... This error message for info threads has changed since commit 54d6600669 'Make "info threads" use the gdb::option framework'. Update the test accordingly. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-24 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR testsuite/24831 * gdb.multi/tids.exp: Update error messages for info threads.
2019-07-24[gdb/testsuite] Fix info-types.exp for debug info from more than one fileTom de Vries2-2/+11
On openSUSE Leap 15.0, I get: ... FAIL: gdb.base/info-types.exp: l=c: info types FAIL: gdb.base/info-types.exp: l=c++: info types ... because the info type command prints info for files info-types.c, stddef.h, elf-init.c and init.c, while the regexp in the test-case expect only info for info-types.c. Fix this by extending the regexp. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-24 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.base/info-types.exp: Allow info types to print info for more than one file.
2019-07-23[gdb/testsuite] Add missing initial prompt read in multidictionary.expTom de Vries2-0/+12
When running multidictionary.exp in conjunction with: ... $ stress -c $(($(cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -c "^processor") + 1)) ... we get: ... Running gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/multidictionary.exp ... ERROR: Couldn't load multidictionary into gdb. === gdb Summary === nr of unresolved testcases 1 ... The multidictionary test-case needs -readnow, and achieves this using: ... gdb_spawn_with_cmdline_opts "-readnow" gdb_load ... but the initial gdb prompt is not read. Usually, the following gdb_load command accidentally consumes that initial prompt (at the gdb_expect for the kill command in gdb_file_cmd). But under high load, that doesn't happen and we run into the error. Fix this by consuming the initial gdb prompt after spawning gdb. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-23 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR testsuite/24842 * gdb.dwarf2/multidictionary.exp: Consume initial prompt after gdb_spawn_with_cmdline_opts.
2019-07-23[gdb][Arm]: gdb cannot step across CMSE secure entry function code.Srinath Parvathaneni5-0/+167
GDB is not able to execute "step" command on function calls of Armv8-M cmse secure entry functions. Everytime GNU linker come across definition of any cmse secure entry function in object file(s), it creates two new instructions secure gateway (sg) and original branch destination (b.w), place those two instructions in ".gnu.sgstubs" section of executable. Any function calls to these cmse secure entry functions is re-directed through secure gateway (sg) present in ".gnu.sgstubs" section. Example: Following is a function call to cmse secure entry function "foo": ... bl xxxx <foo> --->(a) ... <foo> xxxx: push {r7, lr} GNU linker on finding out "foo" is a cmse secure entry function, created sg and b.w instructions and place them in ".gnu.sgstubs" section (marked by c). The "bl" instruction (marked by a) which is a call to cmse secure entry function is modified by GNU linker (as marked by b) and call flow is re-directly through secure gateway (sg) in ".gnu.sgstubs" section. ... bl yyyy <foo> ---> (b) ... section .gnu.sgstubs: ---> (c) yyyy <foo> yyyy: sg // secure gateway b.w xxxx <__acle_se_foo> // original_branch_dest ... 0000xxxx <__acle_se_foo> xxxx: push {r7, lr} ---> (d) On invoking GDB, when the control is at "b" and we pass "step" command, the pc returns "yyyy" (sg address) which is a trampoline and which does not exist in source code. So GDB jumps to next line without jumping to "__acle_se_foo" (marked by d). The above details are published on the Arm website [1], please refer to section 5.4 (Entry functions) and section 3.4.4 (C level development flow of secure code). [1] https://developer.arm.com/architectures/cpu-architecture/m-profile/docs/ecm0359818/latest/armv8-m-security-extensions-requirements-on-development-tools-engineering-specification This patch fixes above problem by returning target pc "xxxx" to GDB on executing "step" command at "b", so that the control jumps to "__acle_se_foo" (marked by d). gdb/ChangeLog: * arm-tdep.c (arm_skip_cmse_entry): New function. (arm_is_sgstubs_section): New function. (arm_skip_stub): Add call to arm_skip_cmse_entry function. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.arch/arm-cmse-sgstubs.c: New test. * gdb.arch/arm-cmse-sgstubs.exp: New file.
2019-07-23[gdb/testsuite] Fix command result testing in mi-complete.expTom de Vries2-2/+10
When running gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp in conjunction with: ... $ stress -c $(($(cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -c "^processor") + 1)) ... we get less than 50% full passes: ... $ for n in $(seq 1 100); do \ make V=1 -O check \ 'RUNTESTFLAGS=gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp --target_board=unix'; \ done 2>&1 \ | grep "expected passes" | sort | uniq -c 45 # of expected passes 7 9 # of expected passes 8 46 # of expected passes 9 ... A diff between a passing and failing gdb.log shows this difference: ... -&"set max-completions 1\n" 2-complete br +&"set max-completions 1\n" ... The problem is that the test-case issues the "set max-completion <n>" command, and without waiting for the output issues a next command, and tries to parse the results of both commands, expecting a specific interleaving of the various output streams. Fix the FAIL by waiting for the result of the "set max-completion <n>" command before issuing another command. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-07-23 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR testsuite/24711 * gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp: Wait for "set max-completions" result before issuing next command.
2019-07-22Remove self-assign from make_invisible_and_set_new_heightTom Tromey2-2/+7
In https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-07/msg00509.html, Jan pointed out that clang points out that make_invisible_and_set_new_height self-assigns "height". This patch fixes the bug by renaming the formal parameter. gdb/ChangeLog 2019-07-22 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * tui/tui-win.c (tui_win_info::make_invisible_and_set_new_height): Don't self-assign.
2019-07-22gdb: Show type summary for anonymous structures from c_print_typedefAndrew Burgess6-8/+73
Currently each language has a la_print_typedef method, this is only used for the "info types" command. The documentation for "info types" says: Print a brief description of all types whose names match the regular expression @var{regexp} (or all types in your program, if you supply no argument). However, if we consider this C code: typedef struct { int a; } my_type; Then currently with "info types" this will be printed like this: 3: typedef struct { int a; } my_type; I see two problems with this, first the indentation is clearly broken, second, if the struct contained more fields then it feels like the actual type names could easily get lost in the noise. Given that "info types" is about discovering type names, I think there is an argument to be made that we should focus on giving _only_ the briefest summary for "info types", and if the user wants to know more they can take the type name and plug it into "ptype". As such, I propose that a better output would be: 3: typedef struct {...} my_type; The user understands that there is a type called `my_type`, and that it's an alias for an anonymous structure type. The change to achieve this turns out to be pretty simple, but only effects languages that make use of c_print_typedef, which are C, C++, asm, minimal, d, go, objc, and opencl. Other languages will for now do whatever they used to do. The patch to change how anonymous structs are displayed also changes the display of anonymous enums, consider this code sample: typedef enum { AA, BB, CC } anon_enum_t; This used to be displayed like this: 3: typedef enum {AA, BB, CC} anon_enum_t; Which will quickly become cluttered for enums with a large number of values. The modified output looks like this: 3: typedef enum {...} anon_enum_t; Again, the user can always make use of ptype if they want to see the details of the anon_enum_t type. It is worth pointing out that this change (to use {...}) only effects anonymous structs and enums, named types don't change with this patch, consider this code: struct struct_t { int i; }; enum enum_t { AA, BB, CC }; The output from 'info types' remains unchanged, like this: 4: enum enum_t; 1: struct struct_t; An additional area of interest is how C++ handles anonymous types used within a typedef; enums are handled basically inline with how C handles them, but structs (and classes) are slightly different. The behaviour before the patch is different, and is unchanged by this patch. Consider this code compiled for C++: typedef struct { int i; } struct_t; Both before and after this patch, this is show by 'info types' as: 3: typedef struct_t struct_t; Unions are displayed similarly to structs in both C and C++, the handling of anonymous unions changes for C in the same way that it changes for anonymous structs. I did look at ada, as this is the only language to actually have some tests for "info types", however, as I understand it ada doesn't really support typedefs, however, by forcing the language we can see what ada would print. So, if we 'set language ada', then originally we printed this: 3: record a: int; end record Again the indentation is clearly broken, but we also have no mention of the type name at all, which is odd, but understandable given the lack of typedefs. If I make a similar change as I'm proposing for C, then we now get this output: 3: record ... end record Which is even less informative I think. However, the original output _is_ tested for in gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp, and its not clear to me if the change is a good one or not, so for now I have left this out. gdb/ChangeLog: * c-typeprint.c (c_print_typedef): Pass -1 instead of 0 to type_print. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp: Update expected results. * gdb.base/info-types.c: Add additional types to check. * gdb.base/info-types.exp: Update expected results.
2019-07-22gdb: Improve output from "info types" commadAndrew Burgess5-13/+222
This commit makes two changes to the "info types" command: First, only use typedef_print for printing typedefs, and use type_print for printing non-typedef scalar (non-struct) types. The result of this is the output for builtin types goes from this: typedef double; typedef float; typedef int; to this: double; float; int; which seems to make more sense. Next GDB no longer matches msymbols as possible type names. When looking for function symbols it makes sense to report matching msymbols from the text sections, and for variables msymbols from the data/bss sections, but when reporting types GDB would match msymbols of type absolute. But I don't see why these are likely to indicate type names. As such I've updated the msymbol matching lists in symtab.c:search_symbols so that when searching in the TYPES_DOMAIN, we never match any msymbols. gdb/ChangeLog: * symtab.c (search_symbols): Adjust msymbol matching type arrays so that GDB doesn't match any msymbols when searching in the TYPES_DOMAIN. (print_symbol_info): Print using typedef_print or type_print based on the type of the symbol. Add updated FIXME comment moved from... (_initialize_symtab): ... move and update FIXME comment to above. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.base/info-types.c: New file. * gdb.base/info-types.exp: New file.