aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-01-25gdb/tui: make use of a scoped_restoreAndrew Burgess1-7/+3
Make use of a scoped_restore object in tui_mld_read_key instead of doing a manual save/restore. I don't think the existing code can throw an exception, so this is just a cleanup rather than a bug fix. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2023-01-25gdb/tui: better filtering of tab completion results for focus commandAndrew Burgess2-9/+33
While working on the previous couple of commits, I noticed that the 'focus' command would happily suggest 'status' as a possible focus completion, even though the 'status' window is non-focusable, and, after the previous couple of commits, trying to focus the status window will result in an error. This commit improves the tab-completion results for the focus command so that the status window is not included.
2023-01-25gdb/tui: convert if/error to an assertAndrew Burgess1-2/+5
While working on the previous commit, I realised that there was an error in tui_set_focus_command that could never be triggered. Since the big tui rewrite (adding dynamic layouts) it is no longer true that there is a tui_win_info object for every window at all times. We now only create a tui_win_info object for a particular window, when the window is part of the current layout. As a result, if we have a tui_win_info pointer, then the window must be visible inside tui_set_focus_command (this function calls tui_enable as its first action, which makes the current layout visible). The gdb.tui/tui-focus.exp test script exercises this area of code, and doesn't trigger the assert, nor do any of our other existing tui tests.
2023-01-25gdb/testsuite/tui: more testing of the 'focus' commandAndrew Burgess3-0/+93
I noticed that we didn't have many tests of the tui 'focus' command, so I started adding some. This exposed a bug in GDB; we are able to focus windows that should not be focusable, e.g. the 'status' window. This is harmless until we then do 'focus next' or 'focus prev', along this code path we assert that the currently focused window is focusable, which obviously, is not always true, so GDB fails with an assertion error. The fix is simple; add a check to the tui_set_focus_command function to ensure that the selected window is focusable. If it is not then an error is thrown. The new tests I've added cover this case.
2023-01-25gdb/testsuite: update gdb.tui/tui-nl-filtered-output.expAndrew Burgess1-21/+16
Following on from the previous commit, in this commit I am updating the test script gdb.tui/tui-nl-filtered-output.exp to take account of the changes in commit: commit 9162a27c5f5828240b53379d735679e2a69a9f41 Date: Tue Nov 13 11:59:03 2018 -0700 Change gdb test suite's TERM setting In the above commit the TERM environment variable was changed to be 'dumb' by default, which means that tests, that previously activated tui mode, no longer do unless TERM is set to 'ansi'. As the gdb.tui/tui-nl-filtered-output.exp script didn't do this, the test stopped working. As the expect patterns in this script were pretty generic no tests actually started failing, and we never noticed. In this commit I update the test script to correctly activate our terminal emulator, the test continues to pass after this update, but now we are testing in tui mode.
2023-01-25gdb/testsuite: update gdb.tui/tui-disasm-long-lines.expAndrew Burgess1-7/+14
Following on from the previous commit, in this commit I am updating the test script gdb.tui/tui-disasm-long-lines.exp to take account of the changes in commit: commit 9162a27c5f5828240b53379d735679e2a69a9f41 Date: Tue Nov 13 11:59:03 2018 -0700 Change gdb test suite's TERM setting In the above commit the TERM environment variable was changed to be 'dumb' by default, which means that tests, that previously activated tui mode, no longer do unless TERM is set to 'ansi'. As the gdb.tui/tui-disasm-long-lines.exp script didn't do this, the test stopped working. As the expect patterns in this script were pretty generic no tests actually started failing, and we never noticed. In this commit I update the script to use Term::clean_restart, which correctly sets TERM to 'ansi'. I've also added a check that the asm box does appear on the screen, which should indicate that tui mode has correctly activated. However, I also notice that GDB doesn't appear to fully work correctly. The test should display the disassembly for the test program, but it doesn't. The test is trying to disassemble some code that (deliberately) uses a very long symbol name, this eventually results in GDB entering tui_source_window_base::show_source_content and trying to allocate an ncurses pad in order to hold the current page of disassembler output. Unfortunately, due to the very long line, the call to newpad fails, meaning that tui_source_window_base::m_pad is nullptr. Luckily non of the following calls appear to crash when passed a nullptr, however, all the output that is written to the pad is lost, which is why we don't see any assembly code written to the screen. As the test history indicates that the script was originally checking for a crash in GDB when the long identifier was encountered, I think there is value in just leaving the test as it is for now, I have a fix for the issue of the newpad call failing, which I'll post in a follow up commit later.
2023-01-25gdb/testsuite: extend gdb.tui/tui-layout.exp test scriptAndrew Burgess1-11/+46
In passing I noticed that the gdb.tui/tui-layout.exp test script was a little strange, it tests the layout command multiple times, but never sets up our ANSI terminal emulator, so every layout command fails with a message about the terminal lacking the required abilities. It turns out that this was caused by this commit: commit 9162a27c5f5828240b53379d735679e2a69a9f41 Date: Tue Nov 13 11:59:03 2018 -0700 Change gdb test suite's TERM setting This was when we changed the testsuite to set the TERM environment variable to "dumb" by default. After this, any tui test that didn't set the terminal mode back to 'ansi' would fail to activate tui mode. For the tui-layout.exp test it just so happens that the test patterns are generic enough that the test continued to pass, even after this change. In this commit I have updated the test so we now check the layout command both with a 'dumb' terminal and with the 'ansi' terminal. When testing with the 'ansi' terminal, I have some limited validation that GDB correctly entered tui mode. I figured that it is probably worth having at least one test in the test suite that deliberately tries to enter tui mode in a dumb terminal, it would be sad if we one day managed to break GDB such that this caused a crash, and never noticed.
2023-01-25gdb/testsuite: rename test source file to match test scriptAndrew Burgess2-1/+1
The previous commit touched the source file for the test script gdb.cp/cpcompletion.exp. This source file is called pr9594.cc. The source file is only used by the one test script. This commit renames the source file to cpcompletion.cc to match the test script, this is more inline with how we name source files these days.
2023-01-25gdb/testsuite: use test_gdb_complete_unique more in C++ testsAndrew Burgess1-4/+4
Spotted in gdb.cp/cpcompletion.exp that we could replace some uses of gdb_test with test_gdb_complete_unique, this will extend the completion testing to check tab-completion as well as completion using the 'complete' command in some additional cases.
2023-01-24gdb: some int to bool conversionEnze Li2-9/+9
When building GDB with clang 16, I got this, CXX maint.o maint.c:1045:23: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion] m_space_enabled = 1; ^ ~ maint.c:1057:22: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion] m_time_enabled = 1; ^ ~ maint.c:1073:24: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion] m_symtab_enabled = 1; ^ ~ 3 errors generated. Work around this by using bool bitfields instead. Tested by rebuilding on x86_64-linux with clang 16 and gcc 12. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-01-23[gdb/tdep, aarch64] Fix frame address of last insnTom de Vries1-1/+6
Consider the test-case test.c, compiled without debug info: ... void foo (const char *s) { } int main (void) { foo ("foo"); return 0; } ... Disassembly of foo: ... 0000000000400564 <foo>: 400564: d10043ff sub sp, sp, #0x10 400568: f90007e0 str x0, [sp, #8] 40056c: d503201f nop 400570: 910043ff add sp, sp, #0x10 400574: d65f03c0 ret ... Now, let's do "info frame" at each insn in foo, as well as printing $sp and $x29 (and strip the output of info frame to the first line, for brevity): ... $ gdb -q a.out Reading symbols from a.out... (gdb) b *foo Breakpoint 1 at 0x400564 (gdb) r Starting program: a.out Breakpoint 1, 0x0000000000400564 in foo () (gdb) display /x $sp 1: /x $sp = 0xfffffffff3a0 (gdb) display /x $x29 2: /x $x29 = 0xfffffffff3a0 (gdb) info frame Stack level 0, frame at 0xfffffffff3a0: (gdb) si 0x0000000000400568 in foo () 1: /x $sp = 0xfffffffff390 2: /x $x29 = 0xfffffffff3a0 (gdb) info frame Stack level 0, frame at 0xfffffffff3a0: (gdb) si 0x000000000040056c in foo () 1: /x $sp = 0xfffffffff390 2: /x $x29 = 0xfffffffff3a0 (gdb) info frame Stack level 0, frame at 0xfffffffff3a0: (gdb) si 0x0000000000400570 in foo () 1: /x $sp = 0xfffffffff390 2: /x $x29 = 0xfffffffff3a0 (gdb) info frame Stack level 0, frame at 0xfffffffff3a0: (gdb) si 0x0000000000400574 in foo () 1: /x $sp = 0xfffffffff3a0 2: /x $x29 = 0xfffffffff3a0 (gdb) info frame Stack level 0, frame at 0xfffffffff3b0: pc = 0x400574 in foo; saved pc = 0x40058c (gdb) si 0x000000000040058c in main () 1: /x $sp = 0xfffffffff3a0 2: /x $x29 = 0xfffffffff3a0 ... The "frame at" bit lists 0xfffffffff3a0 except at the last insn, where it lists 0xfffffffff3b0. The frame address is calculated here in aarch64_make_prologue_cache_1: ... unwound_fp = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame, cache->framereg); if (unwound_fp == 0) return; cache->prev_sp = unwound_fp + cache->framesize; ... For insns after the prologue, we have cache->framereg == sp and cache->framesize == 16, so unwound_fp + cache->framesize gives the wrong answer once sp has been restored to entry value by the before-last insn. Fix this by detecting the situation that the sp has been restored. This fixes PRs tdep/30010 and tdep/30011. This also fixes the aarch64 FAILs in gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp and gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp I reported in PR gdb/PR29721. Tested on aarch64-linux. PR tdep/30010 PR tdep/30011 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30010 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30011
2023-01-23[gdb/testsuite] Avoid using .eh_frame in gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.expTom de Vries1-2/+12
One purpose of the gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp test-case is to test the architecture-specific unwinders on foo, so unwind-on-each-insn-foo.c is compiled with nodebug, to prevent the dwarf unwinders from taking effect. For for instance gcc x86_64 though, -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is enabled by default, generating an .eh_frame section contribution which might enable the dwarf unwinders and bypass the architecture-specific unwinders. Currently, that happens to be not the case due to the current implementation of epilogue_unwind_valid, which assumes that in absence of debug info proving that the compiler is gcc >= 4.5.0, the .eh_frame contribution is invalid. That may change though, see PR30028, in which case gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp stops being a regression test for commit 49d7cd733a7 ("Change calculation of frame_id by amd64 epilogue unwinder"). Fix this by making sure that we don't use .eh_frame info regardless of epilogue_unwind_valid, simply by not generating it using -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables. Tested on x86_64-linux, target boards unix/{-m64,-m32}, using compilers gcc 7.5.0 and clang 13.0.1.
2023-01-23[gdb/testsuite] Simplify gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.expTom de Vries1-51/+11
In test-case gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp, we try to determine the last disassembled insn in function foo. This in it self is fragile, as demonstrated by commit 91836f41e20 ("Powerpc fix for gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp"). The use of the last disassembled insn in the test-case is to stop stepping in foo once reaching it. However, the intent is to stop stepping just before returning to main. There is no guarantee that the last disassembled insn: - is actually executed - is executed just before returning to main - is executed only once. Fix this by simplying the test-case to continue stepping till stepping out of foo. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-01-23[gdb/testsuite] Fix untested in gdb.base/frame-view.expTom de Vries1-1/+1
When running test-case gdb.base/frame-view.exp, I see: ... gdb compile failed, ld: frame-view0.o: in function `main': frame-view.c:73: undefined reference to `pthread_create' ld: frame-view.c:76: undefined reference to `pthread_join' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status UNTESTED: gdb.base/frame-view.exp: failed to prepare ... Fix this by adding pthreads to the compilation flags. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-01-22Remove path name from testTom Tromey1-1/+2
The test suite reports several path names in tests. I couldn't find most of these, and I suspect they are false reports, but I did manage to locate one. This one is probably harmless, as I think the path does not vary; but it's also easy to fix and suppress one warning.
2023-01-22Minor cleanup in gdb.btrace/enable.expTom Tromey1-1/+1
I noticed a weird-looking bit of code in gdb.btrace/enable.exp that is left over from an earlier change. This patch moves the "!" inside the braces, where it belongs.
2023-01-22Minor fixup in allow_aarch64_sve_testsTom Tromey1-1/+1
An earlier patch failed to update a string in allow_aarch64_sve_tests.
2023-01-20gdb: make frame_info_ptr auto-reinflatableSimon Marchi7-28/+36
This is the second step of making frame_info_ptr automatic, reinflate on demand whenever trying to obtain the wrapper frame_info pointer, either through the get method or operator->. Make the reinflate method private, it is used as a convenience method in those two. Add an "is_null" method, because it is often needed to know whether the frame_info_ptr wraps an frame_info or is empty. Make m_ptr mutable, so that it's possible to reinflate const frame_info_ptr objects. Whether m_ptr is nullptr or not does not change the logical state of the object, because we re-create it on demand. I believe this is the right use case for mutable. Change-Id: Icb0552d0035e227f81eb3c121d8a9bb2f9d25794 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: make frame_info_ptr grab frame level and id on constructionSimon Marchi7-31/+12
This is the first step of making frame_info_ptr automatic. Remove the frame_info_ptr::prepare_reinflate method, move that code to the constructor. Change-Id: I85cdae3ab1c043c70e2702e7fb38e9a4a8a675d8 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: make user-created frames reinflatableSimon Marchi7-11/+192
This patch teaches frame_info_ptr to reinflate user-created frames (frames created through create_new_frame, with the "select-frame view" command). Before this patch, frame_info_ptr doesn't support reinflating user-created frames, because it currently reinflates by getting the current target frame (for frame 0) or frame_find_by_id (for other frames). To reinflate a user-created frame, we need to call create_new_frame, to make it lookup an existing user-created frame, or otherwise create one. So, in prepare_reinflate, get the frame id even if the frame has level 0, if it is user-created. In reinflate, if the saved frame id is user create it, call create_new_frame. In order to test this, I initially enhanced the gdb.base/frame-view.exp test added by the previous patch by setting a pretty-printer for the type of the function parameters, in which we do an inferior call. This causes print_frame_args to not reinflate its frame (which is a user-created one) properly. On one machine (my Arch Linux one), it properly catches the bug, as the frame is not correctly restored after printing the first parameter, so it messes up the second parameter: frame #0 baz (z1=hahaha, z2=<error reading variable: frame address is not available.>) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-view.c:40 40 return z1.m + z2.n; (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/frame-view.exp: with_pretty_printer=true: frame frame #0 baz (z1=hahaha, z2=<error reading variable: frame address is not available.>) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-view.c:40 40 return z1.m + z2.n; (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/frame-view.exp: with_pretty_printer=true: frame again However, on another machine (my Ubuntu 22.04 one), it just passes fine, without the appropriate fix. I then thought about writing a selftest for that, it's more reliable. I left the gdb.base/frame-view.exp pretty printer test there, it's already written, and we never know, it might catch some unrelated issue some day. Change-Id: I5849baf77991fc67a15bfce4b5e865a97265b386 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: make it possible to restore selected user-created framesSimon Marchi3-7/+167
I would like to improve frame_info_ptr to automatically grab the information needed to reinflate a frame, and automatically reinflate it as needed. One thing that is in the way is the fact that some frames can be created out of thin air by the create_new_frame function. These frames are not the fruit of unwinding from the target's current frame. These frames are created by the "select-frame view" command. These frames are not correctly handled by the frame save/restore functions, save_selected_frame, restore_selected_frame and lookup_selected_frame. This can be observed here, using the test included in this patch: $ ./gdb --data-directory=data-directory -nx -q testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/frame-view/frame-view Reading symbols from testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/frame-view/frame-view... (gdb) break thread_func Breakpoint 1 at 0x11a2: file /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-view.c, line 42. (gdb) run Starting program: /home/simark/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/frame-view/frame-view [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib/../lib/libthread_db.so.1". [New Thread 0x7ffff7cc46c0 (LWP 4171134)] [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff7cc46c0 (LWP 4171134)] Thread 2 "frame-view" hit Breakpoint 1, thread_func (p=0x0) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-view.c:42 42 foo (11); (gdb) info frame Stack level 0, frame at 0x7ffff7cc3ee0: rip = 0x5555555551a2 in thread_func (/home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-view.c:42); saved rip = 0x7ffff7d4e8fd called by frame at 0x7ffff7cc3f80 source language c. Arglist at 0x7ffff7cc3ed0, args: p=0x0 Locals at 0x7ffff7cc3ed0, Previous frame's sp is 0x7ffff7cc3ee0 Saved registers: rbp at 0x7ffff7cc3ed0, rip at 0x7ffff7cc3ed8 (gdb) thread 1 [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 0x7ffff7cc5740 (LWP 4171122))] #0 0x00007ffff7d4b4b6 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 Here, we create a custom frame for thread 1 (using the stack from thread 2, for convenience): (gdb) select-frame view 0x7ffff7cc3f80 0x5555555551a2 The first calls to "frame" looks good: (gdb) frame #0 thread_func (p=0x7ffff7d4e630) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-view.c:42 42 foo (11); But not the second one: (gdb) frame #0 0x00007ffff7d4b4b6 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 This second "frame" command shows the current target frame instead of the user-created frame. It's not totally clear how the "select-frame view" feature is expected to behave, especially since it's not tested. I heard accounts that it used to be possible to select a frame like this and do "up" and "down" to navigate the backtrace starting from that frame. The fact that create_new_frame calls frame_unwind_find_by_frame to install the right unwinder suggest that it used to be possible. But that doesn't work today: (gdb) select-frame view 0x7ffff7cc3f80 0x5555555551a2 (gdb) up Initial frame selected; you cannot go up. (gdb) down Bottom (innermost) frame selected; you cannot go down. and "backtrace" always shows the actual thread's backtrace, it ignores the user-created frame: (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff7d4b4b6 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff7d50403 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x000055555555521a in main () at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-view.c:56 I don't want to address all the `select-frame view` issues , but I think we can agree that the "frame" command changing the selected frame, as shown above, is a bug. I would expect that command to show the currently selected frame and not change it. This happens because of the scoped_restore_selected_frame object in print_frame_args. The frame information is saved in the constructor (the backtrace below), and restored in the destructor. #0 save_selected_frame (frame_id=0x7ffdc0020ad0, frame_level=0x7ffdc0020af0) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/frame.c:1682 #1 0x00005631390242f0 in scoped_restore_selected_frame::scoped_restore_selected_frame (this=0x7ffdc0020ad0) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/frame.c:324 #2 0x000056313993581e in print_frame_args (fp_opts=..., func=0x62100023bde0, frame=..., num=-1, stream=0x60b000000300) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/stack.c:755 #3 0x000056313993ad49 in print_frame (fp_opts=..., frame=..., print_level=1, print_what=SRC_AND_LOC, print_args=1, sal=...) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/stack.c:1401 #4 0x000056313993835d in print_frame_info (fp_opts=..., frame=..., print_level=1, print_what=SRC_AND_LOC, print_args=1, set_current_sal=1) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/stack.c:1126 #5 0x0000563139932e0b in print_stack_frame (frame=..., print_level=1, print_what=SRC_AND_LOC, set_current_sal=1) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/stack.c:368 #6 0x0000563139932bbe in print_stack_frame_to_uiout (uiout=0x611000016840, frame=..., print_level=1, print_what=SRC_AND_LOC, set_current_sal=1) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/stack.c:346 #7 0x0000563139b0641e in print_selected_thread_frame (uiout=0x611000016840, selection=...) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/thread.c:1993 #8 0x0000563139940b7f in frame_command_core (fi=..., ignored=true) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/stack.c:1871 #9 0x000056313994db9e in frame_command_helper<frame_command_core>::base_command (arg=0x0, from_tty=1) at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/stack.c:1976 Since the user-created frame has level 0 (identified by the saved level -1), lookup_selected_frame just reselects the target's current frame, and the user-created frame is lost. My goal here is to fix this particular problem. Currently, select_frame does not set selected_frame_id and selected_frame_level for frames with level 0. It leaves them at null_frame_id / -1, indicating to restore_selected_frame to use the target's current frame. User-created frames also have level 0, so add a special case them such that select_frame saves their selected id and level. save_selected_frame does not need any change. Change the assertion in restore_selected_frame that checks `frame_level != 0` to account for the fact that we can restore user-created frames, which have level 0. Finally, change lookup_selected_frame to make it able to re-create user-created frame_info objects from selected_frame_level and selected_frame_id. Add a minimal test case for the case described above, that is the "select-frame view" command followed by the "frame" command twice. In order to have a known stack frame to switch to, the test spawns a second thread, and tells the first thread to use the other thread's top frame. Change-Id: Ifc77848dc465fbd21324b9d44670833e09fe98c7 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: add create_new_frame(frame_id) overloadSimon Marchi1-8/+18
The subsequent patches will need to call create_new_frame with an existing frame_id representing a user created frame. They could call the existing create_new_frame, passing both addresses, but it seems nicer to have a version of the function that takes a frame_id directly. Change-Id: If31025314fec0c3e644703e4391a5ef8079e1a32 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: add user-created frames to stashSimon Marchi1-2/+17
A subsequent patch makes it possible for frame_info_ptr to reinflate user-created frames. If two frame_info_ptr objects wrapping the same user-created frame_info need to do reinflation, we want them to end up pointing to the same frame_info instance, and not create two separate frame_infos. Otherwise, GDB gets confused down the line, as the state kept in one frame_info object starts differing from the other frame_info. Achieve this by making create_new_frame place the user-created frames in the frame stash. This way, when the second frame_info_ptr does reinflation, it will find the existing frame_info object, created by the other frame_info_ptr, in the frame stash. To make the frame stash differentiate between regular and user-created frame infos which would otherwise be equal, change frame_addr_hash and frame_id::operator== to account for frame_id::user_created_p. I made create_new_frame look up existing frames in the stash, and only create one if it doesn't find one. The goal is to avoid the "select-frame view"/"info frame view"/"frame view" commands from overriding existing entries into the stash, should the user specify the same frame more than once. This will also help in the subsequent patch that makes frame_info_ptr capable of reinflating user-created frames. It will be able to just call create_new_frame and it will do the right thing. Change-Id: I14ba5799012056c007b4992ecb5c7adafd0c2404 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: add frame_id::user_created_pSimon Marchi2-0/+5
Later in this series, we'll need to differentiate frame ids for regular frames (obtained from the target state and unwinding from it) vs frame ids for user-created frames (created with create_new_frame). Add the frame_id::user_created_p field to indicate a frame is user-created, and set it in create_new_frame. The field is otherwise not used yet, so not changes in behavior are expected. Change-Id: I60de3ce581ed01bf0fddb30dff9bd932840120c3 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: move frame_info_ptr to frame.{c,h}Simon Marchi9-284/+230
A patch later in this series will make frame_info_ptr access some fields internal to frame_info, which we don't want to expose outside of frame.c. Move the frame_info_ptr class to frame.h, and the definitions to frame.c. Remove frame-info.c and frame-info.h. Change-Id: Ic5949759e6262ea0da6123858702d48fe5673fea Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: move call site types to call-site.hSimon Marchi10-218/+253
I hesitated between putting the file in the dwarf2 directory (as gdb/dwarf2/call-site.h) or in the common directory (as gdb/call-site.h). The concept of call site is not DWARF-specific, another debug info reader could provide this information. But as it is, the implementation is a bit DWARF-specific, as one form it can take is a DWARF expression and parameters can be defined using a DWARF register number. So I ended up choosing to put it under dwarf2/. If another debug info reader ever wants to provide call site information, we can introduce a layer of abstraction between the "common" call site and the "dwarf2" call site. The copyright start year comes from the date `struct call_site` was introduced. Change-Id: I1cd84aa581fbbf729edc91b20f7d7a6e0377014d Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: move sect_offset and cu_offset to dwarf2/types.hSimon Marchi2-17/+40
I want to move the call_site stuff out of gdbtypes.h, to a new header file, to break some cyclic include problem. The call_site stuff uses cu_offset, also defined in gdbtypes.h, so cu_offset also needs to move somewhere else (otherwise, call-site.h will need to include gdbtypes.h, and we are back to square 1). I could move cu_offset to the future new file dwarf2/call-site.h, but it doesn't sound like a good place for it, at cu_offset is not specific to call sites, it's used throughout dwarf2/. So, move it to its own file, dwarf2/types.h. For now, gdbtypes.h includes dwarf2/types.h, but that will be removed once the call site stuff is moved to its own file. Move sect_offset with it too. sect_offset is not a DWARF-specific concept, but for the moment it is only used in dwarf2/. Change-Id: I1fd2a3b7b67dee789c4874244b044bde7db43d8e Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: remove language.h include from frame.hSimon Marchi16-1/+15
This helps resolve some cyclic include problem later in the series. The only language-related thing frame.h needs is enum language, and that is in defs.h. Doing so reveals that a bunch of files were relying on frame.h to include language.h, so fix the fallouts here and there. Change-Id: I178a7efec1953c2d088adb58483bade1f349b705 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: move compile_instance to compile/compile.hSimon Marchi7-118/+119
struct compile_instance needs to be visible to users, since we use std::unique<compile_instance>. language.c and c-lang.c currently includes compile-internal.h for this reason, which kind of defeats the purpose of having an "internal" header file. Change-Id: Iedffe5f1173b3de7bdc1be533ee2a68e6f6c549f Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20gdb: move type_map_instance to compile/compile.cSimon Marchi2-13/+13
It's only used in compile/compile.c, it doesn't need to be in a header. Change-Id: Ic5bec996b7b0cd7130055d1e8ff238b5ac4292a3 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-20Use bool in pc_in_* functionsTom Tromey6-22/+17
I noticed that pc_in_unmapped_range had a weird return type -- it was returning a CORE_ADDR but intending to return a bool. This patch changes all the pc_in_* functions to return bool instead.
2023-01-20Constify notif_clientTom Tromey4-26/+26
It seems to me that a notif_client is read-only, so this patch changes the code to use "const" everywhere.
2023-01-20gdb: remove struct trad_frame forward declarationSimon Marchi1-1/+0
I found this forward declaration for a struct that doesn't exist, remove it. Change-Id: Ib9473435a949452160598035e5e0fe19fcdc4d20
2023-01-20Make gdb.ada/ptype_tagged_param.exp passTom Tromey1-19/+23
gdb.ada/ptype_tagged_param.exp is failing for me on x86-64 Fedora 36. However, it's actually generating the correct output -- it is just that the test thinks that the "ptype" will not work because I do not have the GNAT debuginfo installed. This patch changes the code to accept either result, and then to issue a kfail as appropriate.
2023-01-20gdb/dwarf: fix UBsan crash in read_subrange_typeSimon Marchi2-10/+41
When running gdb.ada/arrayptr.exp (and others) on Ubuntu 22.04, with the `gnat-11` package installed (not `gnat`), with UBSan activated, I get: (gdb) break foo.adb:40 /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:17689:20: runtime error: shift exponent 127 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' The problematic DIEs are: 0x00001460: DW_TAG_subrange_type DW_AT_lower_bound [DW_FORM_data1] (0x00) DW_AT_upper_bound [DW_FORM_data16] (ffffffffffffffff3f00000000000000) DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ("foo__packed_array___XP7___XDLU_0__1180591620717411303423") DW_AT_type [DW_FORM_ref4] (0x0000153f "long_long_long_unsigned") DW_AT_GNAT_descriptive_type [DW_FORM_ref4] (0x0000147e) DW_AT_artificial [DW_FORM_flag_present] (true) 0x0000153f: DW_TAG_base_type DW_AT_byte_size [DW_FORM_data1] (0x10) DW_AT_encoding [DW_FORM_data1] (DW_ATE_unsigned) DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ("long_long_long_unsigned") DW_AT_artificial [DW_FORM_flag_present] (true) When processed by this code: negative_mask = -((ULONGEST) 1 << (base_type->length () * TARGET_CHAR_BIT - 1)); if (low.kind () == PROP_CONST && !base_type->is_unsigned () && (low.const_val () & negative_mask)) low.set_const_val (low.const_val () | negative_mask); When the base type's length (16 bytes in this case) is larger than a ULONGEST (typically 8 bytes), the bit shift is too large. My obvious fix is just to skip the fixup for base types larger than a ULONGEST (8 bytes). I don't think we really handle constant attribute values larger than 8 bytes anyway, so this is part of a much larger problem. Add a test that replicates this situation, but uses bounds that fit in a signed 64 bit, so we get a sensible result. Change-Id: I8d0a24f3edd83b44e0761a0ce38922d3e2e112fb Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29386
2023-01-20gdb/testsuite: add test for negative subrange bounds with unsigned formSimon Marchi1-0/+25
I am looking at this code [1]: /* Normally, the DWARF producers are expected to use a signed constant form (Eg. DW_FORM_sdata) to express negative bounds. But this is unfortunately not always the case, as witnessed with GCC, for instance, where the ambiguous DW_FORM_dataN form is used instead. To work around that ambiguity, we treat the bounds as signed, and thus sign-extend their values, when the base type is signed. */ negative_mask = -((ULONGEST) 1 << (base_type->length () * TARGET_CHAR_BIT - 1)); if (low.kind () == PROP_CONST && !base_type->is_unsigned () && (low.const_val () & negative_mask)) low.set_const_val (low.const_val () | negative_mask); if (high.kind () == PROP_CONST && !base_type->is_unsigned () && (high.const_val () & negative_mask)) high.set_const_val (high.const_val () | negative_mask); Nothing in the testsuite seems to exercise it, as when I remove it, all of gdb.dwarf2 still passes. And tests in other directories would be compiler-dependent, so would rely on having a buggy compiler. Update gdb.dwarf2/subrange.exp to have a test for it. When removing the code above, the new test fails with: ptype array_with_buggy_negative_bounds_type^M type = array [240..244] of signed_byte^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/subrange.exp: ptype array_with_buggy_negative_bounds_type instead of the expected: ptype array_with_buggy_negative_bounds_type^M type = array [-16..-12] of signed_byte^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.dwarf2/subrange.exp: ptype array_with_buggy_negative_bounds_type [1] https://gitlab.com/gnutools/binutils-gdb/-/blob/5ea14aa4e53fa37f4ba4517497ed2c1e4c60dee2/gdb/dwarf2/read.c#L17681-17695 Change-Id: I1992a3ff0cb1e90fa8a9114dae6c591792f059c2
2023-01-19Use "maint ignore-probes" in no-libstdcxx-probe.expTom Tromey1-5/+4
While looking at some test output, I saw that no-libstdcxx-probe.exp was not being run. However, it occurred to me that Tom de Vries' new "maint ignore-probes" command could be used to enable this test unconditionally. Reviewed-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2023-01-19GDB/testsuite: Expand for character string limiting optionsAndrew Burgess9-38/+306
Modify test cases that verify the operation of the array element limit with character strings such that they are executed twice, once with the `set print characters' option set to `elements' and the limit controlled with the `set print elements' option, and then again with the limit controlled with the `set print characters' option instead. Similarly with the `-elements' and `-characters' options for the `print' command. Additionally verify that said `print' command options combined yield the expected result. Verify correct $_gdb_setting and $_gdb_setting_str values for the `print characters' setting, in particular the `void' value for the `elements' default, which has no corresponding integer value exposed. Add Guile and Python coverage for the `print characters' GDB setting. There are new tests for Ada and Pascal, as the string printing code for these languages is different than the generic string printing code used by other languages. Modula2 also has different string printing code, but (a) this is similar to Pascal, and (b) there are no existing modula2 tests written in Modula2, so I'm not sure how I'd even test the Modula2 string printing. Co-Authored-By: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@embecosm.com> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-01-19GDB: Add a character string limiting optionAndrew Burgess18-51/+189
This commit splits the `set/show print elements' option into two. We retain `set/show print elements' for controlling how many elements of an array we print, but a new `set/show print characters' setting is added which is used for controlling how many characters of a string are printed. The motivation behind this change is to allow users a finer level of control over how data is printed, reflecting that, although strings can be thought of as arrays of characters, users often want to treat these two things differently. For compatibility reasons by default the `set/show print characters' option is set to `elements', which makes the limit for character strings follow the setting of the `set/show print elements' option, as it used to. Using `set print characters' with any other value makes the limit independent from the `set/show print elements' setting, however it can be restored to the default with the `set print characters elements' command at any time. A corresponding `-characters' option for the `print' command is added, with the same semantics, i.e. one can use `elements' to make a given `print' invocation follow the limit of elements, be it set with the `-elements' option also given with the same invocation or taken from the `set/show print elements' setting, for characters as well regardless of the current setting of the `set/show print characters' option. The GDB changes are all pretty straightforward, just changing references to the old 'print_max' to use a new `get_print_max_chars' helper which figures out which of the two of `print_max' and `print_max_chars' values to use. Likewise, the documentation is just updated to reference the new setting where appropriate. To make people's life easier the message shown by `show print elements' now indicates if the setting also applies to character strings: (gdb) set print characters elements (gdb) show print elements Limit on string chars or array elements to print is 200. (gdb) set print characters unlimited (gdb) show print elements Limit on array elements to print is 200. (gdb) and the help text shows the dependency as well: (gdb) help set print elements Set limit on array elements to print. "unlimited" causes there to be no limit. This setting also applies to string chars when "print characters" is set to "elements". (gdb) In the testsuite there are two minor updates, one to add `-characters' to the list of completions now shown for the `print' command, and a bare minimum pair of checks for the right handling of `set print characters' and `show print characters', copied from the corresponding checks for `set print elements' and `show print elements' respectively. Co-Authored-By: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@embecosm.com> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-01-19GDB: Allow arbitrary keywords in integer set commandsMaciej W. Rozycki19-626/+1136
Rather than just `unlimited' allow the integer set commands (or command options) to define arbitrary keywords for the user to use, removing hardcoded arrangements for the `unlimited' keyword. Remove the confusingly named `var_zinteger', `var_zuinteger' and `var_zuinteger_unlimited' `set'/`show' command variable types redefining them in terms of `var_uinteger', `var_integer' and `var_pinteger', which have the range of [0;UINT_MAX], [INT_MIN;INT_MAX], and [0;INT_MAX] each. Following existing practice `var_pinteger' allows extra negative values to be used, however unlike `var_zuinteger_unlimited' any number of such values can be defined rather than just `-1'. The "p" in `var_pinteger' stands for "positive", for the lack of a more appropriate unambiguous letter, even though 0 obviously is not positive; "n" would be confusing as to whether it stands for "non-negative" or "negative". Add a new structure, `literal_def', the entries of which define extra keywords allowed for a command and numerical values they correspond to. Those values are not verified against the basic range supported by the underlying variable type, allowing extra values to be allowed outside that range, which may or may not be individually made visible to the user. An optional value translation is possible with the structure to follow the existing practice for some commands where user-entered 0 is internally translated to UINT_MAX or INT_MAX. Such translation can now be arbitrary. Literals defined by this structure are automatically used for completion as necessary. So for example: const literal_def integer_unlimited_literals[] = { { "unlimited", INT_MAX, 0 }, { nullptr } }; defines an extra `unlimited' keyword and a user-visible 0 value, both of which get translated to INT_MAX for the setting to be used with. Similarly: const literal_def zuinteger_unlimited_literals[] = { { "unlimited", -1, -1 }, { nullptr } }; defines the same keyword and a corresponding user-visible -1 value that is used for the requested setting. If the last member were omitted (or set to `{}') here, then only the keyword would be allowed for the user to enter and while -1 would still be used internally trying to enter it as a part of a command would result in an "integer -1 out of range" error. Use said error message in all cases (citing the invalid value requested) replacing "only -1 is allowed to set as unlimited" previously used for `var_zuinteger_unlimited' settings only rather than propagating it to `var_pinteger' type. It could only be used for the specific case where a single extra `unlimited' keyword was defined standing for -1 and the use of numeric equivalents is discouraged anyway as it is for historical reasons only that they expose GDB internals, confusingly different across variable types. Similarly update the "must be >= -1" Guile error message. Redefine Guile and Python parameter types in terms of the new variable types and interpret extra keywords as Scheme keywords and Python strings used to communicate corresponding parameter values. Do not add a new PARAM_INTEGER Guile parameter type, however do handle the `var_integer' variable type now, permitting existing parameters defined by GDB proper, such as `listsize', to be accessed from Scheme code. With these changes in place it should be trivial for a Scheme or Python programmer to expand the syntax of the `make-parameter' command and the `gdb.Parameter' class initializer to have arbitrary extra literals along with their internal representation supplied. Update the testsuite accordingly. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-01-19Remove some unused includesTom Tromey3-3/+0
I noticed a few spots that include gnu-stabs.h but that do not need to. This patch removes these unnecessary includes. Tested by rebuilding.
2023-01-19[gdb/tdep, aarch64] Remove fp and sp reg aliases, add x31 reg aliasTom de Vries1-4/+7
In aarch64-tdep.c we find these register aliases: ... { /* 64-bit register names. */ {"fp", AARCH64_FP_REGNUM}, {"lr", AARCH64_LR_REGNUM}, {"sp", AARCH64_SP_REGNUM}, ... The sp alias is superfluous, because the canonical name of x31 is already sp. The fp alias is superfluous, because it's already taken by the default meaning of fp, assigned here in _initialize_frame_reg: ... user_reg_add_builtin ("fp", value_of_builtin_frame_fp_reg, NULL); ... Fix this by removing the fp and sp aliases. While we're at it, add an x31 alias for sp. Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Tested on aarch64-linux. PR tdep/30012 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30012
2023-01-19[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp for big endianTom de Vries2-2/+3
On s390x-linux, I run into: ... (gdb) python print(u[u_fields[0]])^M 99^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp: u's first field via field python print(u[u_fields[1]])^M 0 '\000'^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp: u's second field via field ... There's a var u of this type: ... union U { int a; char c; }; ... and after assigning 99 to u.a, the test-case expects u.c to contain 99 (which it does on x86_64), but instead it contains 0. Fix this by instead assigning 0x63636363, to ensure that u.c == 99 for both little and big endian. Tested on x86_64-linux and s390x-linux.
2023-01-18GDB: Add references to erased args in cli-decode.cMaciej W. Rozycki1-11/+6
Complement commit 1d7fe7f01b93 ("gdb: Introduce setting construct within cmd_list_element") and commit 702991711a91 ("gdb: Have setter and getter callbacks for settings") and update inline documentation accordingly for `add_set_or_show_cmd' and `add_setshow_cmd_full_erased', documenting the `args' parameter and removing references to `var', `set_setting_func' and `get_setting_func'. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-01-18GDB: Add missing inline documentation for `add_setshow_cmd_full'Maciej W. Rozycki1-0/+12
Complement commit 1d7fe7f01b93 ("gdb: Introduce setting construct within cmd_list_element") and add missing description for `add_setshow_cmd_full'.
2023-01-18GDB: Correct inline documentation for `add_setshow_cmd_full_erased'Maciej W. Rozycki1-1/+1
Use proper English in the description of SET_LIST and SHOW_LIST.
2023-01-18GDB: Fix documentation for `theclass' parameters in cli-decode.cMaciej W. Rozycki1-11/+11
Rename CLASS to THECLASS in the documentation for `theclass' parameters throughout cli-decode.c, complementing commit fe978cb071b4 ("C++ keyword cleanliness, mostly auto-generated"). Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-01-18Revert "X86: reverse-finish fix"Carl Love13-230/+106
This reverts commit b22548ddb30bfb167708e82d3bb932461c1b703a. This patch is being reverted since the patch series is causing regressions.
2023-01-18Revert "PowerPC: fix for gdb.reverse/finish-precsave.exp and ↵Carl Love4-160/+31
gdb.reverse/finish-reverse.exp" This reverts commit 92e07580db6a5572573d5177ca23933064158f89. Reverting patch as the patch series is causing regressions.
2023-01-18gdb: care for dynamic objfiles in build_id_bfd_get ()Jan Vrany2-0/+10
Accessing gdb.Objfile.build_id caused GDB to crash when objfile is dynamic, that is created by JIT reader API. The issue was NULL-pointer dereferencing in build_id_bfd_get () because dynamic objfiles have no underlaying BFD structure. This commit fixes the problem by a NULL-check in build_id_bfd_get ().