aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-04-17Introduce exec_file_findGary Benson3-47/+110
This commit adds a new function, exec_file_find, which computes the full pathname of the main executable in much the same way solib_find does for pathnames of shared libraries. The bulk of the existing solib_find was moved into a new static function solib_find_1, with exec_file_find and solib_find being small wrappers for solib_find_1. gdb/ChangeLog: * solist.h (exec_file_find): New declaration. * solib.c (solib_find_1): New function, factored out from... (solib_find): ...here. (exec_file_find): New function.
2015-04-17Introduce exec_file_locate_attachGary Benson4-23/+47
This commit adds a new function, exec_file_locate_attach, which works like exec_file_attach except that, instead of a filename argument, it takes an integer process ID and attempts to determine the executable filename from that. gdb/ChangeLog: * gdbcore.h (exec_file_locate_attach): New declaration. * exec.c (exec_file_locate_attach): New function, factored out from... * infcmd.c (attach_command_post_wait): ...here.
2015-04-17gdb: add myself to blackfin/write-after-approvalMike Frysinger2-0/+6
2015-04-16Fix {mi-tracepoint-changed, mi-tsv-changed}.exp with native-extended-gdbserverPedro Alves2-2/+12
Fixes: -FAIL: gdb.trace/mi-tracepoint-changed.exp: reconnect: break-info 1 +PASS: gdb.trace/mi-tracepoint-changed.exp: reconnect: tracepoint created +PASS: gdb.trace/mi-tracepoint-changed.exp: reconnect: tracepoint on marker is installed +PASS: gdb.trace/mi-tracepoint-changed.exp: reconnect: break-info 1 -FAIL: gdb.trace/mi-tsv-changed.exp: upload: tsv1 created -FAIL: gdb.trace/mi-tsv-changed.exp: upload: tsv2 created +PASS: gdb.trace/mi-tsv-changed.exp: upload: tsv1 created +PASS: gdb.trace/mi-tsv-changed.exp: upload: tsv2 created These tests do something like this: #0 - start gdb/gdbserver normally #1 - setup some things in the debug session #2 - disconnect from gdbserver #3 - restart gdb #4 - reconnect to gdbserver The problem is that the native-extended-gdbserver board always spawns a new gdbserver instance in #3 (and has gdb connect to that). So when the test gets to #4, it connects to that new instance instead of the old one: (gdb) spawn ../gdbserver/gdbserver --multi :2354 Listening on port 2354 target extended-remote localhost:2354 Remote debugging using localhost:2354 ... spawn ../gdbserver/gdbserver --multi :2355 Listening on port 2355 47-target-select extended-remote localhost:2355 =tsv-created,name="trace_timestamp",initial="0"\n 47^connected (gdb) ... 47-target-select extended-remote localhost:2355 47^connected (gdb) FAIL: gdb.trace/mi-tsv-changed.exp: upload: tsv1 created FAIL: gdb.trace/mi-tsv-changed.exp: upload: tsv2 created testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-16 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * boards/native-extended-gdbserver.exp (mi_gdb_start): Don't start a new gdbserver if gdbserver_reconnect_p is set.
2015-04-16Fix gdbserver_reconnect_p handlingPedro Alves2-0/+13
Commit 6423214f (testsuite: Don't use expect_background to reap gdbserver) broke a couple tests that set gdbserver_reconnect_p and restart gdb before reconnecting, because a gdb_exit (e.g., through clean_restart) exits gdbserver unconditionally. Fixes, with --target_board=native-gdbserver: -FAIL: gdb.trace/mi-tracepoint-changed.exp: reconnect: break-info 1 +PASS: gdb.trace/mi-tracepoint-changed.exp: reconnect: tracepoint created +PASS: gdb.trace/mi-tracepoint-changed.exp: reconnect: tracepoint on marker is installed +PASS: gdb.trace/mi-tracepoint-changed.exp: reconnect: break-info 1 -FAIL: gdb.trace/mi-tsv-changed.exp: upload: tsv1 created -FAIL: gdb.trace/mi-tsv-changed.exp: upload: tsv2 created +PASS: gdb.trace/mi-tsv-changed.exp: upload: tsv1 created +PASS: gdb.trace/mi-tsv-changed.exp: upload: tsv2 created gdb/testsuite/ 2015-04-16 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * lib/gdbserver-support.exp (gdb_exit): If gdbserver_reconnect_p is set, don't exit gdbserver.
2015-04-16Honour software single step in fallback of displaced steppingYao Qi2-2/+11
Hi, When I run gdb.threads/non-stop-fair-events.exp on arm-linux target, I see the following message in the debugging log, displaced: breakpoint is gone: Thread 22518, step(1)^M Sending packet: $vCont;s:p57f3.57f6#9d... ^^^^^^^^^ GDB sends vCont;s by mistake, and GDBserver fails on assert. GDB doesn't consider software single step in infrun.c:displaced_step_fixup, /* Go back to what we were trying to do. */ step = currently_stepping (tp); if (debug_displaced) fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "displaced: breakpoint is gone: %s, step(%d)\n", target_pid_to_str (tp->ptid), step); target_resume (ptid, step, GDB_SIGNAL_0); The patch is to let GDB consider software single step here. It fixes fails in gdb.threads/non-stop-fair-events.exp on arm. gdb: 2015-04-16 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * infrun.c (maybe_software_singlestep): Declare. (displaced_step_fixup): Call maybe_software_singlestep.
2015-04-16s390-vregs.exp: Avoid compile errors with older GCCs and on 31-bit targetsAndreas Arnez3-3/+11
The test case s390-vregs.exp yields compile errors on 31-bit targets as well as when using a GCC that defaults to an older "-march=". This patch fixes these issues. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.arch/s390-vregs.S (change_vrs): Replace exrl by an appropriate .insn, such that an older assembler can be used. * gdb.arch/s390-vregs.exp: Add the compile flag -mzarch, to enable the z/Architecture instruction set on 31-bit targets as well.
2015-04-16GDB tests for Go language support: remove unnecessary first breakpointAndreas Arnez9-40/+24
On s390x targets some of the Go test cases fail because the first breakpoint happens to be at the same spot as the breakpoint at main.main. When such a test case tries to continue to the first breakpoint, the program runs until the end instead, and the test fails like this: FAIL: gdb.go/handcall.exp: Going to first breakpoint (the program exited) This patch removes all the handling related to the first breakpoint in those cases. After applying the patch, the tests run successfully on s390x. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.go/handcall.exp: Remove all logic related to the first breakpoint and rely on go_runto_main instead. * gdb.go/strings.exp: Likewise. * gdb.go/unsafe.exp: Likewise. * gdb.go/hello.exp: Likewise. Also rename the remaining breakpoint marker to "breakpoint 1". * gdb.go/handcall.go: Remove comment "set breakpoint 1 here". * gdb.go/strings.go: Likewise. * gdb.go/unsafe.go: Likewise. * gdb.go/hello.go: Likewise. Also remove the second occurrence of "set breakpoint 2 here" and rename the remaining breakpoint marker to "breakpoint 1".
2015-04-15Make info fun|var|types interruptable for psyms.Doug Evans2-0/+6
gdb/ChangeLog: * psymtab.c (psym_expand_symtabs_matching): Add QUIT call.
2015-04-15Make info fun|var|types interruptable.Doug Evans2-0/+8
"info fun foo" can be a pain when it's not interruptable, especially if you're not exactly sure of what you're looking for and provide something that matches too much. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2read.c (dw2_expand_symtabs_matching): Add some QUIT calls.
2015-04-15gdbserver: fix uClibc build whithout MMU.Romain Naour2-1/+5
Since commit d86d4aafd4fa22fa4cccb83253fb187b03f97f48, the pid must be retrieved from current_thread. The change has not been made in the function linux_read_offsets(). Fixes: http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/9e4/9e4df085319e346803c26c65478accb27eb950ae/build-end.log 2015-04-14 Romain Naour <romain.naour@openwide.fr> (tiny change) * linux-low.c (linux_read_offsets): Remove get_thread_lwp. Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@openwide.fr>
2015-04-15Some Python 3 fixesSimon Marchi7-10/+27
Some missing parentheses and one itertools.imap (Py2) vs map (Py3) issue. gdb/ChangeLog: * python/lib/gdb/command/unwinders.py: Add parentheses. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.python/py-framefilter.py (ErrorFilter.filter): Use map function if itertools.imap is not present. * gdb.python/py-objfile.exp: Add parentheses. * gdb.python/py-type.exp: Same. * gdb.python/py-unwind-maint.py: Same.
2015-04-15[arm] Update displaced stepping debug messageYao Qi2-2/+5
When I "set debug displaced 1" to fix fail in gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp, the debug message is wrong. This patch is to fix it. gdb: 2015-04-15 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * arm-linux-tdep.c (arm_linux_copy_svc): Update debug message.
2015-04-15Fix code indentationYao Qi2-41/+46
gdb: 2015-04-15 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * arm-linux-tdep.c (arm_linux_copy_svc): Fix indentation.
2015-04-15[arm] Fix fails in gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.expYao Qi2-3/+8
Hi, I see this fail on arm-linux target, FAIL: gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp: fork: single step over fork final pc which is caused by the PC isn't expected after displaced stepping the svc instruction. The code is: => 0xb6ead9a4 <__libc_do_syscall+4>: svc 0 0xb6ead9a6 <__libc_do_syscall+6>: pop {r7, pc} 0xb6ead9a8: nop.w^M 0xb6ead9ac: nop.w after single step svc instruction, pc should be 0xb6ead9a6, but the actual value of pc is 0xb6ead9a8. The problem is illustrated by turning on debug message of displaced stepping, stepi^M displaced: stepping Thread 12031 now^M displaced: saved 0x8574: 02 bc 6a 46 04 b4 01 b4 df f8 10 c0 4d f8 04 cd 03 48 04 4b ff f7 d2 ef ff f7 e8 ef 0d 87 00 00 ^M displaced: process thumb insn df00 at b6ead9a4^M displaced: copying svc insn df00^M displaced: read r7 value 00000078^M displaced: sigreturn/rt_sigreturn SVC call not in signal trampoline frame^M displaced: writing insn df00 at 00008574^M displaced: copy 0xb6ead9a4->0x8574: displaced: check mode of b6ead9a4 instead of 00008574^M displaced: displaced pc to 0x8574^M displaced: run 0x8574: 00 df 01 de ^M displaced: restored Thread 12031 0x8574^M displaced: PC is apparently 00008576 after SVC step (within scratch space)^M displaced: writing pc b6ead9a8 <----- WRONG ADDRESS GDB writes the wrong address back to pc because GDB thinks the instruction size is 4, which isn't true for thumb instruction. This patch is to replace 4 with dsc->insn_size. gdb: 2015-04-15 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * arm-linux-tdep.c (arm_linux_cleanup_svc): Use dsc->insn_size instead of 4.
2015-04-15Fix fails in gdb.dwarf2/dynarr-ptr.expYao Qi2-1/+6
I see many fails in gdb.dwarf2/dynarr-ptr.exp on arm-linux target, started from this print foo.three_ptr.all^M Cannot access memory at address 0x107c8^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dynarr-ptr.exp: print foo.three_ptr.all print foo.three_ptr.all(1)^M Cannot access memory at address 0x107c8 It turns out that ":$ptr_size" is used incorrectly. array_ptr_label: DW_TAG_pointer_type { {DW_AT_byte_size :$ptr_size } ^^^^^^^^^^ {DW_AT_type :$array_label} } Since the FORM isn't given, and it starts with the ":", it is regarded as a label reference by dwarf assembler. The generated asm file on x86_64 is .uleb128 6 /* Abbrev (DW_TAG_pointer_type) */ .4byte 8 - .Lcu1_begin <----- WRONG .4byte .Llabel2 - .Lcu1_begin Looks .Lcu1_begin is 0 on x86_64 and that is why this test passes on x86_64. On arm, .Lcu1_begin is an address somewhere, and the value of DW_AT_byte_size is a very large number, so memory read request of such large length failed. This patch is to remove ":" and set the form explicitly. The generated asm file on x86_64 becomes .uleb128 6 /* Abbrev (DW_TAG_pointer_type) */ .byte 8 .4byte .Llabel2 - .Lcu1_begin gdb/testsuite: 2015-04-15 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * gdb.dwarf2/dynarr-ptr.exp (assemble): Use $ptr_size instead of ":$ptr_size" and set its form explicitly.
2015-04-15Increase timeout in watch-bitfields.exp for software watchpointYao Qi6-54/+92
I see the following two timeout fails on pandaboard (arm-linux target), FAIL: gdb.base/watch-bitfields.exp: -location watch against bitfields: continue until exit (timeout) FAIL: gdb.base/watch-bitfields.exp: regular watch against bitfields: continue until exit (timeout) In this test, more than one watchpoint is used, so the following watchpoint requests fall back to software watchpoint, so that GDB will single step all the way and it is very slow. This patch is to copy the fix from [PATCH] GDB/testsuite: Correct gdb.base/watchpoint-solib.exp timeout tweak https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-07/msg00716.html I find the left-over of this patch review is to factor out code into a procedure, so I do that in this patch. Re-run tests watch-bitfields.exp, watchpoint-solib.exp, sigall-reverse.exp, and until-precsave.exp on pandaboard, no regression. gdb/testsuite: 2015-04-15 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * gdb.base/watch-bitfields.exp (test_watch_location): Increase timeout by factor of 4. (test_regular_watch): Likewise. * gdb.base/watchpoint-solib.exp: Use with_timeout_factor. * gdb.reverse/sigall-reverse.exp: Likewise. * gdb.reverse/until-precsave.exp: Likewise. * lib/gdb.exp (with_timeout_factor): New proc. (gdb_expect): Move some code to ... (get_largest_timeout): ... here. New procedure.
2015-04-14Harden gdb.base/bp-permanent.expLuis Machado2-1/+6
Reinstate test message and replace hardcoded test command with a variable. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-14 Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com> * gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp (test): Reinstate correct test message.
2015-04-14Zero supplied stat buffers in functions that pretend to statGary Benson5-0/+11
GDB has five places where it pretends to stat for bfd_openr_iovec. Four of these only set the incoming buffer's st_size, leaving the other fields unchanged, which is to say very likely populated with random values from the stack. remote_bfd_iovec_stat was fixed in 0a93529c56714b1da3d7106d3e0300764f8bb81c; this commit fixes the other four. gdb/ChangeLog: * jit.c (mem_bfd_iovec_stat): Zero supplied buffer. * minidebug.c (lzma_stat): Likewise. * solib-spu.c (spu_bfd_iovec_stat): Likewise. * spu-linux-nat.c (spu_bfd_iovec_stat): Likewise.
2015-04-13 * MAINTAINERS: Update my email address.Stan Shebs2-2/+6
diff --git a/gdb/MAINTAINERS b/gdb/MAINTAINERS index a67a1a8..0fdd8e5 100644 --- a/gdb/MAINTAINERS +++ b/gdb/MAINTAINERS @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ Doug Evans dje@google.com Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org Mark Kettenis kettenis@gnu.org Yao Qi yao.qi@arm.com -Stan Shebs stan@codesourcery.com +Stan Shebs stanshebs@google.com Ulrich Weigand Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com Elena Zannoni elena.zannoni@oracle.com Eli Zaretskii eliz@gnu.org @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ Keith Seitz keiths@redhat.com Carlos Eduardo Seo cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com Ozkan Sezer sezeroz@gmail.com Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcroft@arm.com -Stan Shebs stan@codesourcery.com +Stan Shebs stanshebs@google.com Joel Sherrill joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com Mark Shinwell shinwell@codesourcery.com Craig Silverstein csilvers@google.com
2015-04-13Add support for the x86 XSAVE extended state on FreeBSD/x86.John Baldwin14-6/+456
Recognize NT_X86_XSTATE notes in FreeBSD process cores. Recent FreeBSD versions include a note containing the XSAVE state for each thread in the process when XSAVE is in use. The note stores a copy of the current XSAVE mask in a reserved section of the machine-defined XSAVE state at the same offset as Linux's NT_X86_XSTATE note. For native processes, use the PT_GETXSTATE_INFO ptrace request to determine if XSAVE is enabled, and if so the active XSAVE state mask (that is, the value of %xcr0 for the target process) as well as the size of XSAVE state area. Use the PT_GETXSTATE and PT_SETXSTATE requests to fetch and store the XSAVE state, respectively, in the BSD x86 native targets. In addition, the FreeBSD amd64 and i386 native targets now include "read_description" target methods to determine the correct x86 target description for the current XSAVE mask. On FreeBSD amd64 this also properly returns an i386 target description for 32-bit binaries which allows the 64-bit GDB to run 32-bit binaries. Note that the ptrace changes are in the BSD native targets, not the FreeBSD-specific native targets since that is where the other ptrace register accesses occur. Of the other BSDs, NetBSD and DragonFly use XSAVE in the kernel but do not currently export the extended state via ptrace(2). OpenBSD does not currently support XSAVE. bfd/ChangeLog: * elf.c (elfcore_grok_note): Recognize NT_X86_XSTATE on FreeBSD. (elfcore_write_xstatereg): Use correct note name on FreeBSD. gdb/ChangeLog: * amd64-tdep.c (amd64_target_description): New function. * amd64-tdep.h: Export amd64_target_description and tdesc_amd64. * amd64bsd-nat.c [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: New variable amd64bsd_xsave_len. (amd64bsd_fetch_inferior_registers) [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: Handle x86 extended save area. (amd64bsd_store_inferior_registers) [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: Likewise. * amd64bsd-nat.h: Export amd64bsd_xsave_len. * amd64fbsd-nat.c (amd64fbsd_read_description): New function. (_initialize_amd64fbsd_nat): Set "to_read_description" to "amd64fbsd_read_description". * amd64fbsd-tdep.c (amd64fbsd_core_read_description): New function. (amd64fbsd_supply_xstateregset): New function. (amd64fbsd_collect_xstateregset): New function. Add "amd64fbsd_xstateregset". (amd64fbsd_iterate_over_regset_sections): New function. (amd64fbsd_init_abi): Set "xsave_xcr0_offset" to "I386_FBSD_XSAVE_XCR0_OFFSET". Add "iterate_over_regset_sections" gdbarch method. Add "core_read_description" gdbarch method. * i386-tdep.c (i386_target_description): New function. * i386-tdep.h: Export i386_target_description and tdesc_i386. * i386bsd-nat.c [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: New variable i386bsd_xsave_len. (i386bsd_fetch_inferior_registers) [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: Handle x86 extended save area. (i386bsd_store_inferior_registers) [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: Likewise. * i386bsd-nat.h: Export i386bsd_xsave_len. * i386fbsd-nat.c (i386fbsd_read_description): New function. (_initialize_i386fbsd_nat): Set "to_read_description" to "i386fbsd_read_description". * i386fbsd-tdep.c (i386fbsd_core_read_xcr0): New function. (i386fbsd_core_read_description): New function. (i386fbsd_supply_xstateregset): New function. (i386fbsd_collect_xstateregset): New function. Add "i386fbsd_xstateregset". (i386fbsd_iterate_over_regset_sections): New function. (i386fbsd4_init_abi): Set "xsave_xcr0_offset" to "I386_FBSD_XSAVE_XCR0_OFFSET". Add "iterate_over_regset_sections" gdbarch method. Add "core_read_description" gdbarch method. * i386fbsd-tdep.h: New file.
2015-04-13Harden gdb.base/bp-permanent.expLuis Machado2-1/+17
This testcase does not work as expected in QEMU (aarch64 QEMU in my case). It fails when trying to manually write the breakpoint instruction to a certain PC address. (gdb) p /x addr_bp[0] = buffer[0]^M Cannot access memory at address 0x400834^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[0] = buffer[0] p /x addr_bp[1] = buffer[1]^M Cannot access memory at address 0x400835^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[1] = buffer[1] p /x addr_bp[2] = buffer[2]^M Cannot access memory at address 0x400836^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[2] = buffer[2] p /x addr_bp[3] = buffer[3]^M Cannot access memory at address 0x400837^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[3] = buffer[3] The following patch prevents a number of failures by detecting this and bailing out in case the target has such a restriction. Writing to .text from within the program isn't any better. It just leads to a SIGSEGV. Before the patch: === gdb Summary === After the patch: === gdb Summary === gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-13 Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com> * gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp (test): Handle the case of being unable to write to the .text section.
2015-04-13Harden gdb.base/coredump-filter.expLuis Machado2-0/+17
This testcase seems to assume the target is running Linux, so bare metal, simulators and other debugging stubs running different OS' will have a hard time executing some of the commands the testcase issues. Even restricting the testcase to Linux systems (which the patch below does), there are still problems with, say, QEMU not providing PID information when "info inferior" is issued. As a consequence, the subsequent tests will either fail or will not make much sense. The attached patch checks if PID information is available. If not, it just bails out and avoids running into a number of failures. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-13 Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com> * gdb.base/coredump-filter.exp: Restrict test to Linux systems only. Handle the case of targets that do not provide PID information.
2015-04-13Catch exception in lib/gdbserver-support.exp:gdb_exitYao Qi2-9/+22
I see the error when I run gdb-sigterm.exp with native-gdbserver on x86_64-linux. infrun: prepare_to_wait^M Cannot execute this command while the target is running.^M Use the "interrupt" command to stop the target^M and then try again.^M gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #0: got eof gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #0: stepped 12 times ERROR OCCURED: : spawn id exp8 not open while executing "expect { -i exp8 -timeout 10 -re "$gdb_prompt $" { exp_continue } -i "$server_spawn_id" eof { wait -i $expect_out(spawn_id) unse..." ("uplevel" body line 1) invoked from within In gdb-sigterm.exp, SIGTERM is sent to GDB and it exits. However, Dejagnu or tcl doesn't know this. This patch is to catch the exception, but error messages are still shown in the console and gdb.log. In order to avoid this, we also replace gdb_expect with expect. gdb/testsuite: 2015-04-13 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * lib/gdbserver-support.exp (gdb_exit): Catch exception and use expect instead of gdb_expect.
2015-04-13Rename variable "addr" to "coredump_var_addr" in gdb.base/coredump-filter.expSergio Durigan Junior2-4/+9
This commit renames the global array variable "addr" to an unique name "coredump_var_addr" in the test gdb.base/coredump-filter.exp. This is needed because global arrays can have name conflicts between tests. For example, this specific test was conflicting with dmsym.exp, causing errors like: ERROR: tcl error sourcing ../../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dmsym.exp. ERROR: can't set "addr": variable is array while executing "set addr "0x\[0-9a-zA-Z\]+"" (file "../../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dmsym.exp" line 45) invoked from within "source ../../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dmsym.exp" ("uplevel" body line 1) invoked from within "uplevel #0 source ../../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dmsym.exp" invoked from within "catch "uplevel #0 source $test_file_name"" This problem was reported by Yao Qi at: <https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00373.html> Message-Id: <1428666671-12926-1-git-send-email-qiyaoltc@gmail.com> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-13 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> * gdb.base/coredump-filter.exp: Rename variable "addr" to "coredump_var_addr" to avoid naming conflict with other testcases.
2015-04-11Remove --xdbJan Kratochvil22-444/+53
Pedro Alves: The commands that enables aren't even documented in the manual. Judging from that, I assume that only wdb users would ever really be using the --xdb switch. I think it's time to drop "support" for the --xdb switch too. I looked through the commands that that exposes, the only that looked potentially interesting was "go", but then it's just an alias for "tbreak+jump", which can easily be done with "define go...end". I'd rather free up the "go" name for something potentially more interesting (either run control, or maybe even unrelated, e.g., for golang). gdb/ChangeLog 2015-04-11 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> * NEWS (Changes since GDB 7.9): Add removed -xdb. * breakpoint.c (command_line_is_silent): Remove xdb_commands conditional. (_initialize_breakpoint): Remove xdb_commands for bc, ab, sb, db, ba and lb. * cli/cli-cmds.c (_initialize_cli_cmds): Remove xdb_commands for v and va. * cli/cli-decode.c (find_command_name_length): Remove xdb_commands conditional. * defs.h (xdb_commands): Remove declaration. * f-valprint.c (_initialize_f_valprint): Remove xdb_commands for lc. * guile/scm-cmd.c (command_classes): Remove xdb from comment. * infcmd.c (run_no_args_command, go_command): Remove. (_initialize_infcmd): Remove xdb_commands for S, go, g, R and lr. * infrun.c (xdb_handle_command): Remove. (_initialize_infrun): Remove xdb_commands for lz and z. * main.c (xdb_commands): Remove variable. (captured_main): Remove "xdb" from long_options. (print_gdb_help): Remove --xdb from help. * python/py-cmd.c (gdbpy_initialize_commands): Remove xdb from comment. * source.c (_initialize_source): Remove xdb_commands for D, ld, / and ?. * stack.c (backtrace_full_command, args_plus_locals_info) (current_frame_command): Remove. (_initialize_stack): Remove xdb_commands for t, T and l. * symtab.c (_initialize_symtab): Remove xdb_commands for lf and lg. * thread.c (_initialize_thread): Remove xdb_commands condition. * tui/tui-layout.c (tui_toggle_layout_command) (tui_toggle_split_layout_command, tui_handle_xdb_layout): Remove. (_initialize_tui_layout): Remove xdb_commands for td and ts. * tui/tui-regs.c (tui_scroll_regs_forward_command) (tui_scroll_regs_backward_command): Remove. (_initialize_tui_regs): Remove xdb_commands for fr, gr, sr, +r and -r. * tui/tui-win.c (tui_xdb_set_win_height_command): Remove. (_initialize_tui_win): Remove xdb_commands for U and w. * utils.c (pagination_on_command, pagination_off_command): Remove. (initialize_utils): Remove xdb_commands for am and sm. gdb/doc/ChangeLog 2015-04-11 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> * gdb.texinfo (Mode Options): Remove -xdb.
2015-04-10Cleanup signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.expPedro Alves2-10/+15
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.threads/signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp: Use gdb_test_sequence and gdb_assert.
2015-04-10step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: Don't put addresses in test messagesPedro Alves2-2/+10
Diffing test results, I noticed: -PASS: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: with thread-specific bp: next: b *0x0000000000400811 thread 1 +PASS: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: with thread-specific bp: next: b *0x00000000004007d1 thread 1 gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp (do_test): Use test messages that don't include the breakpoint address.
2015-04-10[arm] watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp: skip setting HW points on some addressYao Qi2-0/+33
Hi, ARM linux kernel has some requirements on the address/length setting for HW breakpoints/watchpoints, but watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp doesn't consider them and sets HW points on various addresses. Many fails are causes as a result: stepi^M Warning:^M Could not insert hardware watchpoint 20.^M Could not insert hardware breakpoints:^M You may have requested too many hardware breakpoints/watchpoints.^M ^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp: always-inserted off: watch x watch: : width 2, iter 2: base + 1: stepi advanced watch *(buf.byte + 2 + 1)@2^M Hardware watchpoint 388: *(buf.byte + 2 + 1)@2^M Warning:^M Could not insert hardware watchpoint 388.^M Could not insert hardware breakpoints:^M You may have requested too many hardware breakpoints/watchpoints.^M ^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp: always-inserted on: watch x watch: : width 2, iter 2: base + 1: watch *(buf.byte + 2 + 1)@2 This patch is to reflect kernel requirements in watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp in order to skip some tests. gdb/testsuite: 2015-04-10 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * gdb.base/watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp (valid_addr_p): Return false for some offset and width combinations which aren't supported by linux kernel.
2015-04-10PPC64: Fix step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp with displaced stepping onPedro Alves2-7/+27
PPC64 currently fails this test like: FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: no thread-specific bp: step: step FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: no thread-specific bp: next: next FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: no thread-specific bp: continue: continue (the program exited) FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: with thread-specific bp: step: step FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: with thread-specific bp: next: next FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: with thread-specific bp: continue: continue (the program exited) The problem is that PPC is a non-continuable watchpoints architecture and the displaced stepping code isn't coping with that correctly. On such targets/architectures, a watchpoint traps _before_ the instruction executes/completes. On a watchpoint trap, the PC points at the instruction that triggers the watchpoint (side effects haven't happened yet). In order to move past the watchpoint, GDB needs to remove the watchpoint, single-step, and reinsert the watchpoint, just like when stepping past a breakpoint. The trouble is that if GDB is stepping over a breakpoint with displaced stepping, and the instruction under the breakpoint triggers a watchpoint, we get the watchpoint SIGTRAP, expecting a finished (hard or software) step trap. Even though the thread's PC hasn't advanced yet (must remove watchpoint for that), since we get a SIGTRAP, displaced_step_fixup thinks the single-step finished successfuly anyway, and calls gdbarch_displaced_step_fixup, which then adjusts the thread's registers incorrectly. The fix is to cancel the displaced step if we trip on a watchpoint. handle_inferior_event then processes the watchpoint event, and starts a new step-over, here: ... /* At this point, we are stopped at an instruction which has attempted to write to a piece of memory under control of a watchpoint. The instruction hasn't actually executed yet. If we were to evaluate the watchpoint expression now, we would get the old value, and therefore no change would seem to have occurred. ... ecs->event_thread->stepping_over_watchpoint = 1; keep_going (ecs); return; ... but this time, since we have a watchpoint to step over, watchpoints are removed from the target, so the step-over succeeds. The keep_going/resume changes are necessary because if we're stepping over a watchpoint, we need to remove it from the target - displaced stepping doesn't help, the copy of the instruction in the scratch pad reads/writes to the same addresses, thus triggers the watchpoint too... So without those changes we keep triggering the watchpoint forever, never making progress. With non-stop that means we'll need to pause all threads momentarily, which we can't today. We could avoid that by removing the watchpoint _only_ from the thread that is moving past the watchpoint, but GDB is not prepared for that today either. For remote targets, that would need new packets, so good to be able to step over it in-line as fallback anyway. gdb/ChangeLog: 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * infrun.c (displaced_step_fixup): Switch to the event ptid earlier. If the thread stopped for a watchpoint and the target/arch has non-continuable watchpoints, cancel the displaced step. (resume): Don't start a displaced step if in-line step-over info is valid.
2015-04-10Test step-over-{lands-on-breakpoint|trips-on-watchpoint}.exp with displaced ↵Pedro Alves3-10/+46
stepping These tests exercise the infrun.c:proceed code that needs to know to start new step overs (along with switch_back_to_stepped_thread, etc.). That code is tricky to get right in the multitude of possible combinations (at least): (native | remote) X (all-stop | all-stop-but-target-always-in-non-stop) X (displaced-stepping | in-line step-over). The first two above are properties of the target, but the different step-over-breakpoint methods should work with any target that supports them. This patch makes sure we always test both methods on all targets. Tested on x86-64 Fedora 20. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.threads/step-over-lands-on-breakpoint.exp (do_test): New procedure, factored out from ... (top level): ... here. Add "set displaced-stepping" testing axis. * gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp (do_test): New parameter "displaced". Use it. (top level): Use foreach and add "set displaced-stepping" testing axis.
2015-04-10Make gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp effective on !x86Pedro Alves3-6/+49
This test is currently failing like this on (at least) PPC64 and s390x: FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: no thread-specific bp: step: step FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: no thread-specific bp: next: next FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: with thread-specific bp: step: step FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: with thread-specific bp: next: next gdb.log: (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: no thread-specific bp: step: set scheduler-locking off step wait_threads () at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.c:49 49 return 1; /* in wait_threads */ (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: no thread-specific bp: step: step The problem is that the test assumes that both the "watch_me = 1;" and the "other = 1;" lines compile to a single instruction each, which happens to be true on x86, but no necessarily true everywhere else. The result is that the test doesn't really test what it wants to test. Fix it by looking for the instruction that triggers the watchpoint. gdb/ChangeLog: 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.c (child_function): Remove comment. * gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp (do_test): Find both the address of the instruction that triggers the watchpoint and the address of the instruction immediately after, and use those addresses for the test. Fix comment.
2015-04-10Fix gdb.base/sigstep.exp with displaced stepping on software single-step targetsPedro Alves4-28/+114
TL;DR: When stepping over a breakpoint with displaced stepping, the core must be notified of all signals, otherwise the displaced step fixup code confuses a breakpoint trap in the signal handler for the expected trap indicating the displaced instruction was single-stepped normally/successfully. Detailed version: Running sigstep.exp with displaced stepping on, against my x86 software single-step branch, I got: FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: step on breakpoint, to handler: performing step FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: next on breakpoint, to handler: performing next FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: continue on breakpoint, to handler: performing continue Turning on debug logs, we see: (gdb) step infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (process 32147) infrun: proceed (addr=0xffffffffffffffff, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_DEFAULT) infrun: resume (step=1, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_0), trap_expected=1, current thread [process 32147] at 0x400842 displaced: stepping process 32147 now displaced: saved 0x400622: 49 89 d1 5e 48 89 e2 48 83 e4 f0 50 54 49 c7 c0 displaced: %rip-relative addressing used. displaced: using temp reg 2, old value 0x3615eafd37, new value 0x40084c displaced: copy 0x400842->0x400622: c7 81 1c 08 20 00 00 00 00 00 displaced: displaced pc to 0x400622 displaced: run 0x400622: c7 81 1c 08 LLR: Preparing to resume process 32147, 0, inferior_ptid process 32147 LLR: PTRACE_CONT process 32147, 0 (resume event thread) linux_nat_wait: [process -1], [TARGET_WNOHANG] LLW: enter LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 32147, No child processes LLW: waitpid 32147 received Alarm clock (stopped) LLW: PTRACE_CONT process 32147, Alarm clock (preempt 'handle') LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, No child processes LLW: exit (ignore) sigchld infrun: target_wait (-1.0.0, status) = infrun: -1.0.0 [process -1], infrun: status->kind = ignore infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE infrun: prepare_to_wait linux_nat_wait: [process -1], [TARGET_WNOHANG] LLW: enter LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 32147, No child processes LLW: waitpid 32147 received Trace/breakpoint trap (stopped) CSBB: process 32147 stopped by software breakpoint LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, No child processes LLW: trap ptid is process 32147. LLW: exit infrun: target_wait (-1.0.0, status) = infrun: 32147.32147.0 [process 32147], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED displaced: restored process 32147 0x400622 displaced: fixup (0x400842, 0x400622), insn = 0xc7 0x81 ... displaced: restoring reg 2 to 0x3615eafd37 displaced: relocated %rip from 0x400717 to 0x400937 infrun: stop_pc = 0x400937 infrun: delayed software breakpoint trap, ignoring infrun: no line number info infrun: stop_waiting 0x0000000000400937 in __dso_handle () 1: x/i $pc => 0x400937: and %ah,0xa0d64(%rip) # 0x4a16a1 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: displaced=on: step on breakpoint, to handler: performing step What should have happened is that the breakpoint hit in the signal handler should have been presented to the user. But note that "preempt 'handle'" -- what happened instead is that displaced_step_fixup confused the breakpoint in the signal handler for the expected SIGTRAP indicating the displaced instruction was single-stepped normally/successfully. This should be affecting all software single-step targets in the same way. The fix is to make sure the core sees all signals when displaced stepping, just like we already must see all signals when doing an stepping over a breakpoint in-line. We now get: infrun: target_wait (-1.0.0, status) = infrun: 570.570.0 [process 570], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = GDB_SIGNAL_ALRM infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED displaced: restored process 570 0x400622 infrun: stop_pc = 0x400842 infrun: random signal (GDB_SIGNAL_ALRM) infrun: signal arrived while stepping over breakpoint infrun: inserting step-resume breakpoint at 0x400842 infrun: resume (step=0, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_ALRM), trap_expected=0, current thread [process 570] at 0x400842 LLR: Preparing to resume process 570, Alarm clock, inferior_ptid process 570 LLR: PTRACE_CONT process 570, Alarm clock (resume event thread) infrun: prepare_to_wait linux_nat_wait: [process -1], [TARGET_WNOHANG] LLW: enter LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, No child processes LLW: exit (ignore) infrun: target_wait (-1.0.0, status) = infrun: -1.0.0 [process -1], infrun: status->kind = ignore sigchld infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE infrun: prepare_to_wait linux_nat_wait: [process -1], [TARGET_WNOHANG] LLW: enter LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 570, No child processes LLW: waitpid 570 received Trace/breakpoint trap (stopped) CSBB: process 570 stopped by software breakpoint LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, No child processes LLW: trap ptid is process 570. LLW: exit infrun: target_wait (-1.0.0, status) = infrun: 570.570.0 [process 570], infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED infrun: stop_pc = 0x400717 infrun: BPSTAT_WHAT_STOP_NOISY infrun: stop_waiting Breakpoint 3, handler (sig=14) at /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.c:35 35 done = 1; Hardware single-step targets already behave this way, because the Linux backends (both native and gdbserver) always report signals to the core if the thread was single-stepping. As mentioned in the new comment in do_target_resume, we can't fix this by instead making the displaced_step_fixup phase skip fixing up the PC if the single step stopped somewhere we didn't expect. Here's what the backtrace would look like if we did that: Breakpoint 3, handler (sig=14) at /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.c:35 35 done = 1; 1: x/i $pc => 0x400717 <handler+7>: movl $0x1,0x200943(%rip) # 0x601064 <done> (gdb) bt #0 handler (sig=14) at /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.c:35 #1 <signal handler called> #2 0x0000000000400622 in _start () (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: displaced=on: step on breakpoint, to handler: backtrace gdb/ChangeLog: 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * infrun.c (displaced_step_in_progress): New function. (do_target_resume): Advise target to report all signals if displaced stepping. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.base/sigstep.exp (breakpoint_to_handler) (breakpoint_to_handler_entry): New parameter 'displaced'. Use it. Test "backtrace" in handler. (breakpoint_over_handler): New parameter 'displaced'. Use it. (top level): Add new "displaced" test axis to breakpoint_to_handler, breakpoint_to_handler_entry and breakpoint_over_handler.
2015-04-10gdb/18216: displaced step+deliver signal, a thread needs step-over, crashPedro Alves4-8/+13
The problem is that with hardware step targets and displaced stepping, "signal FOO" when stopped at a breakpoint steps the breakpoint instruction at the same time it delivers a signal. This results in tp->stepped_breakpoint set, but no step-resume breakpoint set. When the next stop event arrives, GDB crashes. Irrespective of whether we should do something more/different to step past the breakpoint in this scenario (e.g., PR 18225), it's just wrong to assume there'll be a step-resume breakpoint set (and was not the original intention). gdb/ChangeLog: 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR gdb/18216 * infrun.c (process_event_stop_test): Don't assume a step-resume is set if tp->stepped_breakpoint is true. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR gdb/18216 * gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: Remove expected eof.
2015-04-10[arm] Fix displaced stepping for thumb alu reg instructionYao Qi5-10/+83
Recent patch series "V2 All-stop on top of non-stop" causes a SIGSEGV in the test case, > -PASS: gdb.base/info-shared.exp: continue to breakpoint: library function #4 > +FAIL: gdb.base/info-shared.exp: continue to breakpoint: library function #4 > > continue^M > Continuing.^M > ^M > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.^M > 0x40021564 in ?? () gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-shared-solib1.so^M > (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/info-shared.exp: continue to breakpoint: library function #4 and an ARM displaced stepping bug is exposed. It can be reproduced by the modified gdb.arch/arm-disp-step.exp as below, continue^M Continuing.^M ^M Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.^M 0xa713cfcc in ?? ()^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/arm-disp-step.exp: continue to breakpoint: continue to test_add_rn_pc_end This patch is to fix it. gdb: 2015-04-10 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * arm-tdep.c (install_alu_reg): Update comment. (thumb_copy_alu_reg): Remove local variable rn. Update debugging message. Use r2 instead of r1 in the modified instruction. gdb/testsuite: 2015-04-10 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * gdb.arch/arm-disp-step.S (main): Call test_add_rn_pc. (test_add_rn_pc): New function. * gdb.arch/arm-disp-step.exp (test_add_rn_pc): New proc. (top level): Invoke test_add_rn_pc.
2015-04-10PR13858 - Can't do displaced stepping with no symbolsPedro Alves10-54/+162
Running break-interp.exp with the target always in non-stop mode trips on PR13858, as enabling non-stop also enables displaced stepping. The problem is that when GDB doesn't know where the entry point is, it doesn't know where to put the displaced stepping scratch pad. The test added by this commit exercises this. Without the fix, we get: (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/step-over-no-symbols.exp: displaced=on: break *$pc set displaced-stepping on (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/step-over-no-symbols.exp: displaced=on: set displaced-stepping on stepi 0x00000000004005be in ?? () Entry point address is not known. (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/step-over-no-symbols.exp: displaced=on: stepi p /x $pc $2 = 0x4005be (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/step-over-no-symbols.exp: displaced=on: get after PC FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-no-symbols.exp: displaced=on: advanced The fix switches all GNU/Linux ports to get the entry point from AT_ENTRY in the target auxiliary vector instead of from symbols. This is currently only done by PPC when Cell debugging is enabled, but I think all archs should be able to do the same. Note that ppc_linux_displaced_step_location cached the result, I'm guessing to avoid constantly re-fetching the auxv out of remote targets, but that's no longer necessary nowadays, as the auxv blob is itself cached in the inferior object. The ppc_linux_entry_point_addr global is obviously bad for multi-process too nowadays. Tested on x86-64 (-m64/-m32), PPC64 (-m64/-m32) and S/390 GNU/Linux. Yao tested the new test on ARM as well. gdb/ChangeLog: 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR gdb/13858 * amd64-linux-tdep.c (amd64_linux_init_abi_common): Install linux_displaced_step_location as gdbarch_displaced_step_location hook. * arm-linux-tdep.c (arm_linux_init_abi): Likewise. * i386-linux-tdep.c (i386_linux_init_abi): Likewise. * linux-tdep.c (linux_displaced_step_location): New function, based on ppc_linux_displaced_step_location. * linux-tdep.h (linux_displaced_step_location): New declaration. * ppc-linux-tdep.c (ppc_linux_entry_point_addr): Delete. (ppc_linux_inferior_created, ppc_linux_displaced_step_location): Delete. (ppc_linux_init_abi): Install linux_displaced_step_location as gdbarch_displaced_step_location hook, even without Cell/B.E.. (_initialize_ppc_linux_tdep): Don't install ppc_linux_inferior_created as inferior_created observer. * s390-linux-tdep.c (s390_gdbarch_init): Install linux_displaced_step_location as gdbarch_displaced_step_location hook. gdb/testsuite/ 2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR gdb/13858 * gdb.base/step-over-no-symbols.exp: New file.
2015-04-10doc patch: compile: missing bitsJan Kratochvil2-0/+86
gdb/doc/ChangeLog 2015-04-10 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> * gdb.texinfo (Compiling and Injecting Code): Describe set debug compile, show debug compile. New subsection Compilation options for the compile command. New subsection Compiler search for the compile command.
2015-04-09Rename common-remote-fileio.[ch] as fileio.[ch]Gary Benson10-73/+98
This commit renames common-remote-fileio.[ch] as fileio.[ch] and renames all functions in these files. gdb/ChangeLog: * common/common-remote-fileio.h: Rename to... * common/fileio.h: ...this. Update all references. (remote_fileio_to_fio_error): Rename to... (host_to_fileio_error): ...this. (remote_fileio_to_be): Rename to... (host_to_bigendian): ...this. Update all callers. (remote_fileio_to_fio_uint): Rename to... (host_to_fileio_uint): ...this. Update all callers. (remote_fileio_to_fio_time): Rename to... (host_to_fileio_time): ...this. Update all callers. (remote_fileio_to_fio_stat): Rename to... (host_to_fileio_stat): ...this. Update all references. * common/common-remote-fileio.c: Rename to... * common/fileio.c: ...this. Update all references. (remote_fileio_to_fio_error): Rename to... (host_to_fileio_error): ...this. Update all callers. (remote_fileio_mode_to_target): Rename to... (fileio_mode_pack): ...this. Update all callers. (remote_fileio_to_fio_mode): Rename to... (host_to_fileio_mode): ...this. Update all callers. (remote_fileio_to_fio_ulong): Rename to... (host_to_fileio_ulong): ...this. Update all callers. (remote_fileio_to_fio_stat): Rename to... (host_to_fileio_stat): ...this. Update all callers.
2015-04-09Add Guile frame-read-register commandAndy Wingo7-0/+103
gdb/ChangeLog: * guile/scm-frame.c (gdbscm_frame_read_register): New function. (frame_functions): Bind gdbscm_frame_read_register to frame-read-register. * guile/lib/gdb.scm (frame-read-register): Export. gdb/doc/ChangeLog: * guile.texi (Frames In Guile): Describe frame-read-register. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.guile/scm-frame.exp: Add frame-read-register tests, modelled after the Python tests.
2015-04-09Introduce new shared function remote_fileio_to_fio_errorGary Benson7-165/+86
This commit introduces a new shared function to replace three identical functions in various places in the codebase. gdb/ChangeLog: * common/common-remote-fileio.h (remote_fileio_to_fio_error): New declaration. * common/common-remote-fileio.c (remote_fileio_to_fio_error): New function, factored out the named functions below. * inf-child.c (gdb/fileio.h): Remove include. (common-remote-fileio.h): New include. (inf_child_errno_to_fileio_error): Remove function. Update all callers to use remote_fileio_to_fio_error. * remote-fileio.c (remote_fileio_errno_to_target): Likewise. gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog: * hostio-errno.c (errno_to_fileio_error): Remove function. Update caller to use remote_fileio_to_fio_error.
2015-04-09Add myself to Write After Approval list.Andy Wingo2-0/+5
gdb/ChangeLog: * MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add Andy Wingo.
2015-04-09Replace $zlibdir with $ZLIBDIR in LDFLAGSH.J. Lu3-3/+12
* acinclude.m4: (GDB_AC_CHECK_BFD): Set ZLIBDIR with $zlibdir. Replace $zlibdir with $ZLIBDIR in LDFLAGS. * configure: Regenerated.
2015-04-09Import strtok_r gnulib modulePedro Alves12-6/+327
gdb/linux-tdep.c recently gained a strtok_r use. That broke --enable-targets=all with some versions of mingw64, which don't have strtok_r: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00266.html Fix that by importing the strtok_r gnulib module. gdb/ChangeLog: 2015-04-09 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gnulib/update-gnulib.sh (IMPORTED_GNULIB_MODULES): Add strtok_r. * gnulib/Makefile.in (aclocal_m4_deps): Add import/m4/strtok_r.m4. * gnulib/configure, gnulib/config.in, gnulib/aclocal.m4: Regenerate. * gnulib/import/Makefile.am: Update. * gnulib/import/Makefile.in: Update. * gnulib/import/m4/gnulib-cache.m4: Update. * gnulib/import/m4/gnulib-comp.m4: Update. * gnulib/import/m4/strtok_r.m4: New file. * gnulib/import/strtok_r.c: New file.
2015-04-09update-gnulib.sh: work around aclocal warning with Perl >= 5.16Pedro Alves2-1/+22
gdb/ChangeLog: 2015-04-09 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gnulib/update-gnulib.sh (aclocal version check): Filter out "called too early to check prototype".
2015-04-09gdbserver gnu/linux: stepping over breakpointYao Qi3-8/+16
Hi, I see the following error on arm linux gdbserver, continue^M Continuing.^M ../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/gdbserver/linux-arm-low.c:458: A problem internal to GDBserver has been detected.^M raw_bkpt_type_to_arm_hwbp_type: unhandled raw type^M Remote connection closed^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/cond-eval-mode.exp: hbreak: continue After we make GDBserver handling Zx/zx packet idempotent, [PATCH 3/3] [GDBserver] Make Zx/zx packet handling idempotent. https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00480.html > Now removal/insertion of all kinds of breakpoints/watchpoints, either > internal, or from GDB, always go through the target methods. GDBserver handles all kinds of breakpoints/watchpoints through target methods. However, some target backends, such as arm, don't support Z0 packet but need software breakpoint to do breakpoint stepping over in linux-low.c:start_step_over, if (can_hardware_single_step ()) { step = 1; } else { CORE_ADDR raddr = (*the_low_target.breakpoint_reinsert_addr) (); set_reinsert_breakpoint (raddr); step = 0; } a software breakpoint is requested to the backend, and the error is triggered. This problem should affect targets having breakpoint_reinsert_addr hooked. Instead of handling memory breakpoint in these affected linux backend, this patch handles memory breakpoint in linux_{insert,remove}_point, that, if memory breakpoint is requested, call {insert,remove}_memory_breakpoint respectively. Then, it becomes unnecessary to handle memory breakpoint for linux x86 backend, so this patch removes the code there. This patch is tested with GDBserver on x86_64-linux and arm-linux (-marm, -mthumb). Note that there are still some fails in gdb.base/cond-eval-mode.exp with -mthumb, because GDBserver doesn't know how to select the correct breakpoint instruction according to the arm-or-thumb-mode of requested address. This is a separate issue, anyway. gdb/gdbserver: 2015-04-09 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * linux-low.c (linux_insert_point): Call insert_memory_breakpoint if TYPE is raw_bkpt_type_sw. (linux_remove_point): Call remove_memory_breakpoint if type is raw_bkpt_type_sw. * linux-x86-low.c (x86_insert_point): Don't call insert_memory_breakpoint. (x86_remove_point): Don't call remove_memory_breakpoint.
2015-04-08Fix Python completion when using the "complete" commandSergio Durigan Junior5-69/+226
This patch is related to PR python/16699, and is an improvement over the patch posted here: <https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-03/msg00301.html> Keith noticed that, when using the "complete" command on GDB to complete a Python command, some strange things could happen. In order to understand what can go wrong, I need to explain how the Python completion mechanism works. When the user requests a completion of a Python command by using TAB, GDB will first try to determine the right set of "brkchars" that will be used when doing the completion. This is done by actually calling the "complete" method of the Python class. Then, when we already know the "brkchars" that will be used, we call the "complete" method again, for the same values. If you read the thread mentioned above, you will see that one of the design decisions was to make the "cmdpy_completer_helper" (which is the function the does the actual calling of the "complete" method) cache the first result of the completion, since this result will be used in the second call, to do the actual completion. The problem is that the "complete" command does not process the brkchars, and the current Python completion mechanism (improved by the patch mentioned above) relies on GDB trying to determine the brkchars, and then doing the completion itself. Therefore, when we use the "complete" command instead of doing a TAB-completion on GDB, there is a scenario where we can use the invalid cache of a previous Python command that was completed before. For example: (gdb) A <TAB> (gdb) complete B B value1 B value10 B value2 B value3 B value4 B value5 B value6 B value7 B value8 B value9 (gdb) B <TAB> comp1 comp2 comp4 comp6 comp8 comp10 comp3 comp5 comp7 comp9 Here, we see that "complete B " gave a different result than "B <TAB>". The reason for that is because "A <TAB>" was called before, and its completion results were "value*", so when GDB tried to "complete B " it wrongly answered with the results for A. The problem here is using a wrong cache (A's cache) for completing B. We tried to come up with a solution that would preserve the caching mechanism, but it wasn't really possible. So I decided to completely remove the cache, and doing the method calling twice for every completion. This is not optimal, but I do not think it will impact users noticeably. It is worth mentioning another small issue that I found. The code was doing: wordobj = PyUnicode_Decode (word, sizeof (word), host_charset (), NULL); which is totally wrong, because using "sizeof" here will lead to always the same result. So I changed this to use "strlen". The testcase also catches this problem. Keith kindly expanded the existing testcase to cover the problem described above, and everything is passing. gdb/ChangeLog: 2015-04-08 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> PR python/16699 * python/py-cmd.c (cmdpy_completer_helper): Adjust function to not use a caching mechanism. Adjust comments and code to reflect that. Replace 'sizeof' by 'strlen' when fetching 'wordobj'. (cmdpy_completer_handle_brkchars): Adjust call to cmdpy_completer_helper. Call Py_XDECREF for 'resultobj'. (cmdpy_completer): Likewise. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-08 Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> PR python/16699 * gdb.python/py-completion.exp: New tests for completion. * gdb.python/py-completion.py (CompleteLimit1): New class. (CompleteLimit2): Likewise. (CompleteLimit3): Likewise. (CompleteLimit4): Likewise. (CompleteLimit5): Likewise. (CompleteLimit6): Likewise. (CompleteLimit7): Likewise.
2015-04-08Add test for PR18214 and PR18216 - multiple step-overs with queued signalsPedro Alves3-14/+88
Both PRs are triggered by the same use case. PR18214 is about software single-step targets. On those, the 'resume' code that detects that we're stepping over a breakpoint and delivering a signal at the same time: /* Currently, our software single-step implementation leads to different results than hardware single-stepping in one situation: when stepping into delivering a signal which has an associated signal handler, hardware single-step will stop at the first instruction of the handler, while software single-step will simply skip execution of the handler. ... Fortunately, we can at least fix this particular issue. We detect here the case where we are about to deliver a signal while software single-stepping with breakpoints removed. In this situation, we revert the decisions to remove all breakpoints and insert single- step breakpoints, and instead we install a step-resume breakpoint at the current address, deliver the signal without stepping, and once we arrive back at the step-resume breakpoint, actually step over the breakpoint we originally wanted to step over. */ doesn't handle the case of _another_ thread also needing to step over a breakpoint. Because the other thread is just resumed at the PC where it had stopped and a breakpoint is still inserted there, the thread immediately re-traps the same breakpoint. This test exercises that. On software single-step targets, it fails like this: KFAIL: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: displaced=off: signal thr3: continue to sigusr1_handler KFAIL: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: displaced=off: signal thr2: continue to sigusr1_handler gdb.log (simplified): (gdb) continue Continuing. Breakpoint 4, child_function_2 (arg=0x0) at src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:66 66 callme (); /* set breakpoint thread 2 here */ (gdb) thread 3 (gdb) queue-signal SIGUSR1 (gdb) thread 1 [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 0x7ffff7fc1740 (LWP 24824))] #0 main () at src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:106 106 wait_threads (); /* set wait-threads breakpoint here */ (gdb) break sigusr1_handler Breakpoint 5 at 0x400837: file src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c, line 31. (gdb) continue Continuing. [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff7fc0700 (LWP 24828)] Breakpoint 4, child_function_2 (arg=0x0) at src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c:66 66 callme (); /* set breakpoint thread 2 here */ (gdb) KFAIL: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: displaced=off: signal thr3: continue to sigusr1_handler For good measure, I made the test try displaced stepping too. And then I found it crashes GDB on x86-64 (a hardware step target), but only when displaced stepping... : KFAIL: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: displaced=on: signal thr1: continue to sigusr1_handler (PRMS: gdb/18216) KFAIL: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: displaced=on: signal thr2: continue to sigusr1_handler (PRMS: gdb/18216) KFAIL: gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: displaced=on: signal thr3: continue to sigusr1_handler (PRMS: gdb/18216) Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x000000000062a83a in process_event_stop_test (ecs=0x7fff847eeee0) at src/gdb/infrun.c:4964 4964 if (sr_bp->loc->permanent Setting up the environment for debugging gdb. Breakpoint 1 at 0x79fcfc: file src/gdb/common/errors.c, line 54. Breakpoint 2 at 0x50a26c: file src/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c, line 217. (top-gdb) p sr_bp $1 = (struct breakpoint *) 0x0 (top-gdb) bt #0 0x000000000062a83a in process_event_stop_test (ecs=0x7fff847eeee0) at src/gdb/infrun.c:4964 #1 0x000000000062a1af in handle_signal_stop (ecs=0x7fff847eeee0) at src/gdb/infrun.c:4715 #2 0x0000000000629097 in handle_inferior_event (ecs=0x7fff847eeee0) at src/gdb/infrun.c:4165 #3 0x0000000000627482 in fetch_inferior_event (client_data=0x0) at src/gdb/infrun.c:3298 #4 0x000000000064ad7b in inferior_event_handler (event_type=INF_REG_EVENT, client_data=0x0) at src/gdb/inf-loop.c:56 #5 0x00000000004c375f in handle_target_event (error=0, client_data=0x0) at src/gdb/linux-nat.c:4658 #6 0x0000000000648c47 in handle_file_event (file_ptr=0x2e0eaa0, ready_mask=1) at src/gdb/event-loop.c:658 The all-stop-non-stop series fixes this, but meanwhile, this augments the multiple-step-overs.exp test to cover this, KFAILed. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-08 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> PR gdb/18214 PR gdb/18216 * gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.c (sigusr1_handler): New function. (main): Install it as SIGUSR1 handler. * gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp (setup): Remove 'prefix' parameter. Always use "setup" as prefix. Toggle "set displaced-stepping" off/on depending on global. Don't switch to thread 1 here. (top level): Add displaced stepping "off/on" test axis. Update "setup" calls. Wrap each subtest with with_test_prefix. Test continuing with a queued signal in each thread.
2015-04-08[spu] Don't call set_gdbarch_cannot_step_breakpoint in spu_gdbarch_initYao Qi2-1/+5
Nowadays, in infrun.c:resume, the setting to 'step' variable is like: if (use_displaced_stepping (gdbarch) && tp->control.trap_expected && sig == GDB_SIGNAL_0 && !current_inferior ()->waiting_for_vfork_done) { } /* Do we need to do it the hard way, w/temp breakpoints? */ else if (step) step = maybe_software_singlestep (gdbarch, pc); <-- [1] ... if (execution_direction != EXEC_REVERSE && step && breakpoint_inserted_here_p (aspace, pc)) { ... if (gdbarch_cannot_step_breakpoint (gdbarch)) <-- [2] step = 0; } spu doesn't have displaced stepping and uses software single step, so 'step' is set to zero in [1], and [2] becomes unreachable as a result. So don't have to call set_gdbarch_cannot_step_breakpoint in spu_gdbarch_init. gdb: 2015-04-08 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * spu-tdep.c (spu_gdbarch_init): Don't call set_gdbarch_cannot_step_breakpoint.
2015-04-08Fix gdb.trace/{actions,infotrace,while-stepping}.exp with extended-remotePedro Alves4-3/+33
The recent actions.exp change to check gdb_run_cmd succeeded caught further problems. The test now fails like this with --target_board=native-extended-gdbserver: FAIL: gdb.trace/actions.exp: Can't run to main gdb.log shows: (gdb) run Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/actions Running the default executable on the remote target failed; try "set remote exec-file"? (gdb) FAIL: gdb.trace/actions.exp: Can't run to main The problem is that a gdb_load call is missing. Grepping around for similar problems in other tests, I found that infotrace.exp and while-stepping.exp should be likewise affected. And indeed this is what we get today: FAIL: gdb.trace/infotrace.exp: tstart FAIL: gdb.trace/infotrace.exp: continue to end (the program is no longer running) FAIL: gdb.trace/infotrace.exp: tstop FAIL: gdb.trace/infotrace.exp: 2.6: info tracepoints (trace buffer usage) FAIL: gdb.trace/while-stepping.exp: tstart FAIL: gdb.trace/while-stepping.exp: tstop FAIL: gdb.trace/while-stepping.exp: tfile: info tracepoints FAIL: gdb.trace/while-stepping.exp: ctf: info tracepoints while-stepping.exp even has the same race bug actions.exp had. After this, {actions,infotrace,while-stepping}.exp all pass cleanly with the native-extended-gdbserver board. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-04-08 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.trace/actions.exp: Use gdb_load before gdb_run_cmd. * gdb.trace/infotrace.exp: Use gdb_load before gdb_run_cmd. Use gdb_breakpoint instead of gdb_test that doesn't expect anything. Return early if running to main fails. * gdb.trace/while-stepping.exp: Likewise.
2015-04-07Initialize variable on gdb/linux-tdep.c:decode_vmflagsSergio Durigan Junior2-1/+5
This obvious commit initializes the 'saveptr' variable on gdb/linux-tdep.c:decode_vmflags. This was causing a build failure on Fedora 21 x86_64, caught by the BuildBot here: <https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/2015-q2/msg00450.html>