aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-09-07gdb/corefile: improve file backed mapping handlingAndrew Burgess5-73/+648
This commit improves how GDB handles file backed mappings within a core file, specifically, this is a restructuring of the function core_target::build_file_mapping. The primary motivation for this commit was to put in place the infrastructure to support the next commit in this series, but this commit does itself make some improvements. Currently in core_target::build_file_mapping we use gdbarch_read_core_file_mappings to iterate over the mapped regions within a core file. For each region a callback is invoked which is passed details of the mapping; the file the mapping is from, the offset into the file, and the address range at which the mapping exists. We are also passed the build-id for the mapped file in some cases. We are only told the build-id for the mapped region which actually contains the ELF header of the mapped file. Other regions of the same mapped ELF will not have the build-id passed to the callback. Within core_target::build_file_mapping, in the per-region callback, we try to find the mapped file based on its filename. If the file can't be found, and if we have a build-id then we'll ask debuginfod to download the file. However we find the file, we cache the opened bfd object, which is good. Subsequent mappings from the same file will not have a build-id set, but by that point we already have a cached open bfd object, so the lack of build-id is irrelevant. The problem with the above is that if we find a matching file based on the filename, then we accept that file, even if we have a build-id, and the build-id doesn't match. Currently, the mapped region processing is done in a single pass, we call gdbarch_read_core_file_mappings, and for each mapping, as we see it, we create the data structures needed to represent that mapping. In this commit, I will change this to a two phase process. In the first phase the mappings are grouped together based on the name of the mapped file. At the end of phase one we have a 'struct mapped_file', a new struct, for each mapped file. This struct associates an optional build-id with a list of mapped regions. In the second phase we try to find the file using its filename. If the file is found, and the 'struct mapped_file' has a build-id, then we'll compare the build-id with the file we found. This allows us to reject on-disk files which have changed since the core file was created. If no suitable file was found (either no file found, or a build-id mismatch) then we can use debuginfod to potentially download a suitable file. NOTE: In the future we could potentially add additional sanity checks here, for example, if a data-file is mapped, and has no build-id, we can estimate a minimum file size based on the expected mappings. If the file we find is not big enough then we can reject the on-disk file. But I don't know how useful this would actually be, so I've not done that for now. Having found (or not) a suitable file then we can create the data structures for each mapped region just as we did before. The new functionality here is the extra build-id check, and the possibility of rejecting an on-disk file if the build-id doesn't match. This change could have been done within the existing single phase approach I think, however, in the next approach I need to have all the mapped regions associated with the expected build-id, and the new two phase structure allows me to do that, this is the reason for such an extensive rewrite in this commit. There's a new test that exercises GDB's ability to find mapped files via the build-id, and this downloading from debuginfod.
2024-09-07gdb/corefile: don't pretend unavailable sections are readableAndrew Burgess2-72/+101
When GDB opens a core file the bfd library processes the core file and creates sections within the bfd object to represent each of the segments within the core file. GDB then creates two target_section lists, m_core_section_table and m_core_file_mappings, these, along with m_core_unavailable_mappings, are used by GDB to implement core_target::xfer_partial; this is the function used when GDB tries to read memory from a core file inferior. The m_core_section_table list represents sections within the core file itself. The sections in this list can be split into two groups based on whether the section has the SEC_HAS_CONTENTS flag set or not. Sections (from the core file) that have the SEC_HAS_CONTENTS flag had their contents copied into the core file when the core file was created. These correspond to writable sections within the original inferior (the inferior for which the core file was created). Sections (from the core file) that do not have the SEC_HAS_CONTENTS flag will not have had their contents copied into the core file when it was created. These sections correspond to read-only sections mapped from a file (possibly the initial executable, or possibly some other file) in the original inferior. The expectation is that the contents of these sections can still be found by looking in the file that was originally mapped. The m_core_file_mappings list is created when GDB parses the mapped file list in the core file. Every mapped region will be covered by entries in the m_core_section_table list (see above), but for read-only mappings the entry in m_core_section_table will not have the SEC_HAS_CONTENTS flag set. As GDB parses the mapped file list, if the file that was originally mapped can be found, then GDB creates an entry in the m_core_file_mappings list which represents the region of the file that was mapped into the original inferior. However, GDB only creates entries in m_core_file_mappings if it is able to find the correct on-disk file to open. If the file can't be found then an entry is added to m_core_unavailable_mappings instead. If is the handling m_core_unavailable_mappings which I think is currently not completely correct. When a read lands within an m_core_unavailable_mappings region we currently forward the read to the exec file stratum. The reason for this is this: when GDB read the mapped file list, if the executable file could not be found at the expected path then mappings within the executable will end up in the m_core_unavailable_mappings list. However, the user might provide the executable to GDB from a different location. If this happens then forwarding the read to the exec file stratum might give a result. But, if the exec file stratum does not resolve the access then currently we continue through ::xfer_partial, the next step of which is to handle m_core_section_table entries that don't have the SEC_HAS_CONTENTS flag set. Every m_core_unavailable_mappings entry will naturally have an m_core_section_table without the SEC_HAS_CONTENTS flag set, and so we treat the unavailable mapping as zero initialised memory and return all zeros. It is this fall through behaviour that I think is wrong. If a read falls in an unavailable region, and the exec file stratum cannot help, then I think the access should fail. To achieve this goal I have removed the xfer_memory_via_mappings helper function and moved its content inline into ::xfer_partial. Now, if an access is within an m_core_unavailable_mappings region, and the exec file stratum doesn't help, we immediately return with an error. The reset of ::xfer_partial is unchanged, I've extended some comments in the area that I have changed to (I hope) explain better what's going on. There's a new test that covers the new functionality, an inferior maps a file and generates a core file. We then remove the mapped file, load the core file and try to read from the mapped region. The expectation is that GDB should give an error rather than claiming that the region is full of zeros.
2024-09-06Fix 'catch exception' with -fltoTom Tromey5-11/+102
A user noticed that when an Ada program (including the runtime) is compiled with -flto, then "catch exception" does not work -- even though setting the equivalent breakpoint by hand does work. Looking into this, it turns out that GCC puts the exception functions from the Ada runtime into a CU that uses the C language, not Ada. Then, when trying to look up the relevant symbol, lookup_name_info::search_name_hash uses the "verbatim" form of the symbol name (like "<__gnat_debug_raise_exception>") rather than the "<>"-less form, causing the symbol not to be found. This patch fixes the problem in two steps. First, lookup_name_info::search_name_hash is changed to use the same hack that language_defn::get_symbol_name_matcher uses. That is, when the current language is Ada, verbatim-mode lookups are special-cased. (This is a bit unfortunate; perhaps a better long term approach would be to promote verbatim mode to a fundamental mode of lookup_name_info.) Second, although the above fixes the problem in the Ada language mode, the code still fails in other languages. However, due to the way these lookups are coded in ada-lang.c, I think it makes sense to temporarily set the current language to Ada in create_ada_exception_catchpoint. Tested on x86-64 Fedora 38. A new test case that mimics the -flto scenario is included. Reviewed-By: Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova <ahajkova@redhat.com>
2024-09-06Clear Ada symbol cacheTom Tromey3-2/+7
This patch changes "maint flush symbol-cache" to also flush the Ada-specific symbol cache. This can be helpful when working on the Ada code. Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2024-09-06Test -fgnat-encodings=all in tagged_access.expTom Tromey1-10/+15
While working on a longer series, I needed to make sure this particular test kept working with -fgnat-encodings=all, so this patch adds it to the test.
2024-09-06Introduce and use foreach_gnat_encodingTom Tromey37-97/+93
gnat-llvm does not support the -fgnat-encodings flag. This patch prepares gdb's Ada tests to handle this situation by introducing a new foreach_gnat_encoding. A subsequent patch may change this to support gnat-llvm; meanwhile this is a little cleaner anyway.
2024-09-06Fix the build-id option for GCC default configurationBernd Edlinger1-4/+5
It is possible that the compiler is configured to do so automatically, but at least for GCC the configure option --enable-linker-build-id is not enabled by default. So the option -Wl,--build-id should be used regardless of which compiler is used. Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2024-09-04Improve comments in dwarf2/parent-map.hTom Tromey1-4/+27
I noticed that the comments for class parent_map aren't very clear. This patch attempts to fix this, and also clarifies a point on parent_map_map::add_map. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2024-09-04gdb: reformat Python file with blackAndrew Burgess1-1/+3
Fix formatting of a Python file added in commit: commit a92e943014f5e8d6a2eaccaf8a725941ac47a121 Date: Wed Aug 14 15:16:46 2024 +0100 gdb: implement ::re_set method for catchpoint class No functional change after this commit.
2024-09-04gdb: implement ::re_set method for catchpoint classAndrew Burgess6-5/+378
It is possible to attach a condition to a catchpoint. This can't be done when the catchpoint is created, but can be done with the 'condition' command, this is documented in the GDB manual: You can also use the 'if' keyword with the 'watch' command. The 'catch' command does not recognize the 'if' keyword; 'condition' is the only way to impose a further condition on a catchpoint. A GDB crash was reported against Fedora GDB where a user had attached a condition to a catchpoint and then restarted the inferior. When the catchpoint was hit GDB would immediately segfault. I was able to reproduce the failure on upstream GDB: (gdb) file ./some/binary (gdb) catch syscall write (gdb) run ... Catchpoint 1 (returned from syscall write), 0x00007ffff7b594a7 in write () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) condition 1 $_streq((char *) $rsi, "foobar") == 0 (gdb) run ... Fatal signal: Segmentation fault ... What happened here is that on the system in question we had debug information available for both the main application and also for libc. When the condition was attached GDB was stopped inside libc and as the debug information was available GDB found a reference to the 'char' type (for the cast) inside libc's debug information. When the inferior is restarted GDB discards all of the objfiles associated with shared libraries, and this includes libc. As such the 'char' type, which is objfile owned, is discarded and the reference to it from the catchpoint's condition expression becomes invalid. Now, if it were a breakpoint instead of a catchpoint, what would happen is that after the shared library objfiles had been discarded we'd call the virtual breakpoint::re_set method on the breakpoint, and this would update the breakpoint's condition expression. This is because user breakpoints are actually instances of the code_breakpoint class and the code_breakpoint::re_set method contains the code to recompute the breakpoint's condition expression. However, catchpoints are instances of the catchpoint class which inherits from the base breakpoint class. The catchpoint class does not override breakpoint::re_set, and breakpoint::re_set is empty! The consequence of this is that catchpoint condition expressions are never recomputed, and the dangling pointer to the now deleted, objfile owned type 'char' is left around, and, when the catchpoint is hit, the invalid pointer is used when GDB tries to evaluate the condition expression. In this commit I have implemented catchpoint::re_set. This is pretty simple and just recomputes the condition expression as you'd expect. If the condition doesn't evaluate then the catchpoint is marked as disabled_by_cond. I have also made breakpoint::re_set pure virtual. With the addition of catchpoint::re_set every sub-class of breakpoint now implements the ::re_set method, and if new sub-classes are added in the future I think that they _must_ implement ::re_set in order to avoid this problem. As such falling back to an empty breakpoint::re_set doesn't seem helpful. For testing I have not relied on stopping in libc and having libc debug information available, this doesn't seem like a good idea for the GDB testsuite. Instead I create a (rather pointless) condition check that uses a type defined only within a shared library. When the inferior is restarted the catchpoint will temporarily be marked as disabled_by_cond (due to the type not being available), but once the shared library is loaded again the catchpoint will be re-enabled. Without the fixes above then the same crashing behaviour can be observed. One point of note: the dangling pointer of course exposes undefined behaviour, with no guarantee of a crash. Though a crash is what I usually see I have see GDB throw random errors from the expression evaluation code, and once, I saw no problem at all! If you recompile GDB with the address sanitizer, or run under valgrind, then the bug will be exposed every time. After fixing this bug I checked bugzilla and found PR gdb/29960 which is the same bug. I was able to reproduce the bug before this commit, and after this commit GDB is no longer crashing. Before: (gdb) file /tmp/hello.x Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x... (gdb) run Starting program: /tmp/hello.x Hello World [Inferior 1 (process 1101855) exited normally] (gdb) catch syscall 1 Catchpoint 1 (syscall 'write' [1]) (gdb) condition 1 write.fd == 1 (gdb) run Starting program: /tmp/hello.x Fatal signal: Segmentation fault ... And after: (gdb) file /tmp/hello.x Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x... (gdb) run Starting program: /tmp/hello.x Hello World Args: ( 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ) [Inferior 1 (process 1102373) exited normally] (gdb) catch syscall 1 Catchpoint 1 (syscall 'write' [1]) (gdb) condition 1 write.fd == 1 (gdb) r Starting program: /tmp/hello.x Error in testing condition for breakpoint 1: Attempt to extract a component of a value that is not a structure. Catchpoint 1 (call to syscall write), 0x00007ffff7eb94a7 in write () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) ptype write type = <unknown return type> () (gdb) Notice we get the error now when the condition fails to evaluate. This seems reasonable given that 'write' will be a function, and indeed the final 'ptype' shows that it's a function, not a struct. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29960 Reviewed-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2024-09-04[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.arch/riscv-tdesc-regs.expTom de Vries1-13/+1
On riscv64-linux, with test-case gdb.arch/riscv-tdesc-regs.exp I get: ... (gdb) info registers fflags^M fflags 0x0 NV:0 DZ:0 OF:0 UF:0 NX:0^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/riscv-tdesc-regs.exp: info registers fflags info registers frm^M frm 0x0 FRM:0 [RNE (round to nearest; ties to even)]^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/riscv-tdesc-regs.exp: info registers frm ... The FAILs are produced by: ... foreach reg {fflags frm} { gdb_test_multiple "info registers $reg" "" { -re "^info registers $reg\r\n" { exp_continue } -wrap -re "^Invalid register `$reg`" { fail $gdb_test_name } -wrap -re "^$reg\\s+\[^\r\n\]+" { pass $gdb_test_name } } } ... The first clause is meant to consume the command. The '^' char was updated to mean "consume command", so that clause no longer works since it now attempts to consume the command twice. Also, it's unnecessary because the following clauses start with ^. Then, the second clause is unnecessary because there's a default clause producing the FAIL. Fix this by simplifying to: ... foreach reg {fflags frm} { gdb_test "info registers $reg" "^$reg\\s+\[^\r\n\]+" } ... Tested on riscv64-linux. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-09-04MAINTAINERS: Update my email addressShahab Vahedi1-1/+1
2024-09-04[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lines.exp on arm-linuxTom de Vries5-1/+143
With test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lines.exp on arm-linux, I run into: ... (gdb) break bar_label^M Breakpoint 2 at 0x4004f6: file dw2-lines.c, line 29.^M (gdb) continue^M Continuing.^M ^M Breakpoint 2, bar () at dw2-lines.c:29^M 29 foo (2);^M (gdb) PASS: $exp: cv=2: cdw=32: lv=2: ldw=32: continue to breakpoint: foo \(1\) ... The pass is incorrect because the continue lands at line 29 with "foo (2)" instead of line line 27 with "foo (1)". A minimal version is: ... $ gdb -q -batch dw2-lines.cv-2-cdw-32-lv-2-ldw-32 -ex "b bar_label" Breakpoint 1 at 0x4f6: file dw2-lines.c, line 29. ... where: ... 000004ec <bar>: 4ec: b580 push {r7, lr} 4ee: af00 add r7, sp, #0 000004f0 <bar_label>: 4f0: 2001 movs r0, #1 4f2: f7ff fff1 bl 4d8 <foo> 000004f6 <bar_label_2>: 4f6: 2002 movs r0, #2 4f8: f7ff ffee bl 4d8 <foo> ... So, how does this happen? In short: - skip_prologue_sal calls arm_skip_prologue with pc == 0x4ec, - thumb_analyze_prologue returns 0x4f2 (overshooting by 1 insn, PR tdep/31981), and - skip_prologue_sal decides that we're mid-line, and updates to 0x4f6. However, this is a test-case about .debug_line info, so why didn't arm_skip_prologue use the line info to skip the prologue? The answer is that the line info starts at bar_label, not at bar. Fixing that allows us to work around PR tdep/31981. Likewise in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-line-number-zero.exp. Instead, add a new test-case gdb.arch/skip-prologue.exp that is dedicated to checking quality of architecture-specific prologue analysis, without being written in an architecture-specific way. If fails on arm-linux for both marm and mthumb: ... FAIL: gdb.arch/skip-prologue.exp: f2: $bp_addr == $prologue_end_addr (skipped too much) FAIL: gdb.arch/skip-prologue.exp: f4: $bp_addr == $prologue_end_addr (skipped too much) ... and passes for: - x86_64-linux for {m64,m32}x{-fno-PIE/-no-pie,-fPIE/-pie} - aarch64-linux. Tested on arm-linux.
2024-09-03[gdb] Fix typosTom de Vries18-18/+18
Fix a few typos. unconditionaly -> unconditionally gratuitiously -> gratuitously configureable -> configurable represention -> representation distiguished -> distinguished breakpointer -> breakpoint asssignments -> assignments architectual -> architectural compatibity -> compatibility adjustement -> adjustment unexcepted -> unexpected propogated -> propagated consistant -> consistent succeding -> succeeding higlight -> highlight detachs -> detach Tested by rebuilding on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2024-08-31[gdb/testsuite] Handle unsupported catch syscallTom de Vries3-28/+75
On riscv64-linux, I run into: ... Expecting: ^(catch syscall[^M ]+)?((&.*)*.*~"Catchpoint 5 .*\\n".*=breakpoint-created,bkpt=\{number="5",type="catchpoint".*\}.*\n\^done[^M ]+[(]gdb[)] ^M [ ]*) catch syscall^M &"catch syscall\n"^M &"The feature 'catch syscall' is not supported on this architecture yet.\n"^M ^error,msg="The feature 'catch syscall' is not supported on this architecture yet."^M (gdb) ^M FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-changed.exp: test_insert_delete_modify: catch syscall (unexpected output) ... Fix this by: - factoring out proc supports_catch_syscall out of gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp, and - using it in gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-changed.exp. Tested on x86_64-linux and riscv64-linux. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-08-30gdb: remove duplicate check in disable_breakpoints_in_freed_objfileAndrew Burgess1-4/+0
I spotted that we have a duplicate condition check in the function disable_breakpoints_in_freed_objfile. Lets remove it. There should be no user visible changes after this commit. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-30gdb/dwarf2: cleanup includesSimon Marchi19-25/+21
Cleanup includes in dwarf2/*. 1. Add the necessary includes so that clangd reports no errors when opening header files. This ensures that header files include what they use. 2. Remove all includes reported as unused by clangd (except gdb-safe-ctype.h, which I think does some magic that affects what follows). Built-tested --enable-threading at "yes" and "no", since there are some portions of code gated by `#ifdef CXX_STD_THREAD`. Change-Id: I21debffcd7c2caf90f08e1e0fbba3ce30422d042 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-30Minor formatting fix in breakpoint.cTom Tromey1-1/+2
I noticed a spot in breakpoint.c that doesn't follow gdb's formatting rules: the return type is on the same line as the method name.
2024-08-30Fix regexp quoting in gdb.ada test casesTom Tromey14-43/+43
I noticed that some gdb.ada tests used regular expressions like: "Continuing\..*$inferior_exited_re.*" \ Here, the "\." should either be "." or "\\." -- "\." is not really meaningful. This patch fixes all the cases of this I could find in gdb.ada. In one test (fun_renaming.exp), using "\\." would result in failures, and here I rewrote the tests to use -wrap. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-08-30gdb/doc: fix typo in 'watch' commandNicolás Ortega Froysa1-1/+1
* gdb/breakpoint.c (watch_option_defs): Fix typo. Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes.
2024-08-29gdb: reject inserting breakpoints between functionsAndrew Burgess16-56/+210
When debugging ROCm code, you might have something like this: __global__ void kernel () { ... // break here ... } int main () { // Code to call `kernel` } ... where kernel is a function compiled to execute on the GPU. It does not exist in the host x86-64 program that runs the main function, and GDB doesn't know about that function until it is called, at which point the runtime loads the corresponding code object and GDB learns about the code of the "kernel" function. Before the GPU code object is loaded, from the point of view of GDB, you might as well have blank lines instead of the "kernel" function. The DWARF in the host program doesn't describe anything at these lines. So, a common problem that users face is: - Start GDB with the host binary - Place a breakpoint by line number at the "break here" line - At this point, GDB only knows about the host code, the lines of the `kernel` function are a big void. - GDB finds no code mapped to the "break here" line and searches for the first following line that has code mapped to it. - GDB finds that the line with the opening bracket of the `main` function (or around there) has code mapped to it, places breakpoint there. - User runs the program. - The programs hits the breakpoint at the start of main. - User is confused, because they didn't ask for a breakpoint in main. If they continue, the code object eventually gets loaded, GDB reads the debug info from it, re-evaluates the breakpoint locations, and at this point the breakpoint is placed at the expected location. The goal of this patch is to get rid of this annoyance. A case similar to the one shown above can actually be simulated without GPU-specific code: using a single source file to generate a library and an executable loading that library (see the new test gdb.linespec/line-breakpoint-outside-function.c for an example). Before the library is loaded, trying to place a breakpoint in the library code results in the breakpoint "drifting" down to the main function. To address this problem, make it so that when a user requests a breakpoint outside a function, GDB makes a pending breakpoint, rather than placing a breakpoint at the next line with code, which happens to be in the next function. When the GPU kernel or shared library gets loaded, the breakpoint resolves to a location in the kernel or library. Note that we still want breakpoints placed inside a function to "drift" down to the next line with code. For example, here: 9 10 void foo() 11 { 12 int x; 13 14 x++; There is probably no code associated to lines 10, 12 and 13, but the user can still reasonably expect to be able to put a breakpoint there. In my experience, GCC maps the function prologue to the line with the opening curly bracket, so the user will be able to place a breakpoint there anyway (line 11 in the example). But I don't really see a use case to put a breakpoint above line 10 and expect to get a breakpoint in foo. So I think that is a reasonable behavior change for GDB. This is implemented using the following heuristic: - If a breakpoint is requested at line L but there is no code mapped to L, search for a following line with associated code (this already exists today). - However, if: 1. the found location falls in a function symbol's block 2. the found location's address is equal the entry PC of that function 3. the found location's line is greater that the requested line ... then we don't place a breakpoint at the found location, we will end up with a pending breakpoint. Change the message "No line X in file..." to "No compiled code for line X in file...". There is clearly a line 9 in the example above, so it would be weird to say "No line 9 in file...". What we mean is that there is no code associated to line 9. All the regressions that I found this patch to cause were: 1. tests specifically this behavior where placing a breakpoint before a function results in a breakpoint on that function, in which case I removed the tests or changed them to expect a pending breakpoint 2. linespec tests expecting things like "break -line N garbage" to error out because of the following garbage, but we now got a different error because line N now doesn't resolve to something anymore. For example, before: (gdb) break -line 3 if foofoofoo == 1 No symbol "foofoofoo" in current context. became (gdb) break -line 3 if foofoofoo == 1 No line 3 in the current file. These tests were modified to refer to a valid line with code, so that we can still test what we intended to test. Notes: - The CUDA compiler "solves" this problem by adding dummy function symbols between functions, that are never called. So when you try to insert a breakpoint in the not-yet-loaded kernel, the breakpoint still drifts, but is placed on some dummy symbol. For reasons that would be too long to explain here, the ROCm compiler does not do that, and it is not a desirable option. - You can have constructs like this: void host_function() { struct foo { static void __global__ kernel () { // Place breakpoint here } }; // Host code that calls `kernel` } The heuristic won't work then, as the breakpoint will drift somewhere inside the enclosing function, but won't be at the start of that function. So a bogus breakpoint location will be created on the host side. I don't think that people are going to use this kind of construct often though, so we can probably ignore it (or at least it shouldn't prevent making the more common case better). ROCm doesn't support passing a lambda kernel function to hipLaunchKernelGGL (the function used to launch kernels on the device), but if it eventually does, there will be the same problem. I think that to properly support this, we will need some DWARF improvements to be able to say "there is really nothing at these lines" in the line table. Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Change-Id: I3cc12cfa823dc7d8e24dd4d35bced8e8baf7f9b6
2024-08-29gdb/doc: move NEWS entry to the correct placeAndrew Burgess1-5/+7
In commit: commit 3055e3d2f13bb84db90b9c19d427c362053775d2 Date: Tue May 21 15:58:02 2024 +0100 gdb: add GDB side target_ops::fileio_stat implementation I managed to place a NEWS entry in the wrong place. I put the entry in 'Changes in GDB 15' rather than 'Changes since GDB 15'. This commit moves the entry to the correct place.
2024-08-29gdb: include gdbsupport/gdb_obstack.h in addrmap.hSimon Marchi1-1/+2
This header file uses auto_obstack, found in gdbsupport/gdb_obstack.h. This fixes an error shown when editing addrmap.h with clangd, and makes it so addrmap.h includes what it uses. Change-Id: I0b0c8d26638e2150fcb65c601098ed9df5a8945a
2024-08-29gdb: remove unused includes in linespec.cSimon Marchi1-2/+0
Remove some includes reported as unused by clangd. Change-Id: Id1d5130430cdd2a37da1325a5eb67677f37905df
2024-08-29[gdb/testsuite] Fix another regexp in gdb.threads/stepi-over-clone.expTom de Vries1-1/+1
On openSUSE Tumbleweed, I run into: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/stepi-over-clone.exp: catch process syscalls continue^M Continuing.^M ^M Catchpoint 2 (call to syscall clone3), __clone3 () at clone3.S:62^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/stepi-over-clone.exp: continue ... Fix this by updating another (see commit 8fbf220321d) regexp to also recognize __clone3. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2024-08-29[gdb/testsuite] Fix regexp in gdb.arch/i386-disp-step-self-call.expTom de Vries2-2/+2
Usually, with test-case gdb.arch/i386-disp-step-self-call.exp I get: ... (gdb) x/1wx 0xffffc4f8^M 0xffffc4f8: 0x08048472^M (gdb) PASS: $exp: check return address was updated correctly ... but sometimes I run into: ... (gdb) x/1wx 0xffffc5c8^M 0xffffc5c8: 0x0804917e^M (gdb) FAIL: $exp: check return address was updated correctly ... The problem is that here: ... set next_insn_addr 0x[format %08X $next_insn_addr] gdb_test "x/1wx 0x[format %x $sp]" "$hex:\\s+$next_insn_addr" \ "check return address was updated correctly" ... we're trying to match string 0x0804917e against regexp 0x0804917E due to using "%08X" as format string. We only run into this problem if the address contains letters, which apparently usually isn't the case. Fix this by using "%08x" instead as format string. Likewise in test-case gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-self-call.exp. Tested on x86_64-linux. PR testsuite/32121 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32121
2024-08-28Don't check dwarf2_name in process_enumeration_scopeTom Tromey1-6/+1
I noticed that process_enumeration_scope checks the result of dwarf2_name. However, this isn't needed, because new_symbol does the same check. This patch removes the unnecessary code. Reviewed-by: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
2024-08-28gdb/testsuite: fix gdb.btrace/non-stop.exp end of history checkGuinevere Larsen1-7/+9
The recent commit 089197010993b3a5dc50bf882470bab2de696d92 changed the warnings when GDB reaches the end of the recorded history, and updated tests to expect the new messages. The pattern used for gdb.btrace/non-stop.exp, however, was too broad and could cause the following test result: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.btrace/non-stop.exp: no progress: all: thread apply all continue: prompt ^M Reached end of recorded history; stopping.^M Following forward execution will be added to history.^M test (arg=0x0) at /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.btrace/non-stop.c:30^M 30 return arg; /* bp.2 */^M ^M Reached end of recorded history; stopping.^M Following forward execution will be added to history.^M test (arg=0x0) at /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.btrace/non-stop.c:30^M 30 return arg; /* bp.2 */^M PASS: gdb.btrace/non-stop.exp: no progress: all: thread apply all continue: thread 0 FAIL: gdb.btrace/non-stop.exp: no progress: all: thread apply all continue: thread 1 (timeout) ... This happens because the pattern looks like one of these 2: "Reached end of recorded.*Backwards execution.*" "Reached end of recorded.*Following forward.*" What seems to have happened is that all the output came at once, and most of it was consumed by the first '.*' pattern when checking for thread 0, so there was no output left for checking thread 1. This commit fixes that by making the expected outputs more exact. I also fixed the whitespace errors in gdb_cont_to_no_history_backwards that pre-dated the commit above, since I was already touching that proc. Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2024-08-28gdb/testsuite: add no-delete-breakpoints option to 'runto' procAndrew Burgess3-29/+20
New 'no-delete-breakpoints' option for the 'runto' proc. This option disables the delete_breakpoints call early on in this proc. There are a couple of places in the testsuite where I have used: proc no_delete_breakpoints {} {} with_override delete_breakpoints no_delete_breakpoints { if {![runto_main]} { return } } In order to avoid the deleting all breakpoints when I call runto_main. I was about to add yet another instance of this pattern and I figured that it's time to do this properly. This commit adds the new option to 'runto' which causes the delete_breakpoints call to be skipped. And, we now forward any arguments from 'runto_main' through to 'runto', this means I can now just do: if {![runto_main no-delete-breakpoints]} { return } which I think is cleaner and easier to understand. I've updated the two tests I found that use the old with_override approach. There should be no change in what is tested after this commit. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-28gdb: add 'maint info blocks' commandAndrew Burgess4-1/+253
While reviewing a patch I wanted to understand which blocks existed at a given address. The 'maint print symbols' command does provide some of this information, but that command displays all blocks within a given symtab. If I want to know which blocks are at a given address I have to figure that out for myself based on the output of 'maint print symbols' ... and I'm too lazy for that! So this command lists just those blocks at a given address, along with information about the blocks type. This new command doesn't list the symbols within each block, for that my expectation is that you'd cross reference the output with that of 'maint print symbols'. The new command format is: maintenance info blocks maintenance info blocks ADDRESS This lists the blocks at ADDRESS, or at the current $pc if ADDRESS is not given. Blocks are listed starting at the global block, then the static block, and then the progressively narrower scoped blocks. For each block we list the internal block pointer (which allows easy cross referencing with 'maint print symbols'), the inferior address range, along with other useful information. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2024-08-28gdb: Add 'maint info inline-frames' commandAndrew Burgess5-58/+534
While reviewing a patch I wanted to view GDB's inline frame state. I don't believe there's currently a maintenance command to view this information, so in this commit I've added one. The new command is: maintenance info inline-frames maintenance info inline-frames ADDRESS The command lists the inline frames that start at ADDRESS, or at the current $pc if no ADDRESS is given. The command also displays the "outer" function in which the inline functions are present. An example of the command output: (gdb) maintenance info inline-frames Cached inline state information for thread 1. program counter = 0x401137 skipped frames = 1 bar > foo main (gdb) This tells us that function 'main' called 'foo' which called 'bar'. The functions 'foo' and 'bar' are both inline and both start at the address 0x401137. Currently GDB considers the inferior to be stopped in frame 'foo' (note the '>' marker), this means that there is 1 skipped frame (function 'bar'). The function 'main' is the outer function. The outer function might not start at 0x401137, it is simply the function that contains the inline functions. If the user does a 'step' then GDB will not actually move the inferior forward, but will instead simply tell the user that the inferior entered 'bar'. The output of 'maint info inline-frames' will change like this: (gdb) step bar () at inline.c:6 6 ++global_counter; (gdb) maintenance info inline-frames Cached inline state information for thread 1. program counter = 0x401137 skipped frames = 0 > bar foo main (gdb) Now GDB is in function 'bar' and there are no skipped frames. I have renamed skipped_symbols to function symbols within the inline_state class. We are now going to carry the "outer" function (the function that contains all the inlined functions) within this list (as the last entry), so the old name didn't really make sense. As a consequence of this rename I've updated some comments. I've changed stopped_by_user_bp_inline_frame to take a symbol rather than a block. Previously we just used the block to access the associated function symbol. After this commit we can just pass in the function symbol directly, so lets do that. New function gather_inline_frames contains some of the logic pulled from skip_inline_frames. This new function builds the list of all symbols of inlined functions that start at a given $pc value and also the "outer" function that contains all of the inlined functions. In skip_inline_frames I've split the loop logic into two. The loop to build the function symbol list has moved to gather_inline_frames. The loop to figure out how many of the inlined functions we are skipping remains in skip_inline_frames and uses the result of calling gather_inline_frames. In inline_skipped_symbol there are some minor updates to the comment, and I've tweaked one of the asserts now that the function symbols list also contains the "outer" function (a <= becomes <). The maintenance_info_inline_frames function is now and implements the new maintenance command. And _initialize_inline_frame is updated to register the new command. I've added a basic test for the new command. Please excuse the file name for the new test, in the next commit I'll be adding additional tests and at that point the file name will make sense. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2024-08-28gdb: make symbols const in struct inline_stateAndrew Burgess4-7/+7
Make the inline_state::skipped_symbols a vector of 'const symbol *', adding the const qualifier. There's only a couple of places this leaks into the rest of GDB and in both places its fine for the symbol to become const. There should be no functional change after this commit. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2024-08-28Revert "gdb: remove inline_frame::skipped_frames"Andrew Burgess1-22/+29
This reverts commit 713e89012e43c83a6c1bb957c43ff58e5433336c. Having inline_state::skipped_frames back will make a later patch in this series easier.
2024-08-27[gdb/testsuite] Fix regexp in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inter-cu-error.expTom de Vries1-1/+1
In commit b5070480d74 ("[gdb/symtab] Change DWARF_ERROR from Dwarf Error to DWARF Error") I changed the dwarf error prefix, but failed to update test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inter-cu-error.exp. Fix this by updating the corresponding regexp in the test-case. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2024-08-27[gdb/python] Use GDB_PY_SET_HANDLE_EXCEPTION more oftenTom de Vries4-8/+4
I found a few more places where we can use GDB_PY_SET_HANDLE_EXCEPTION. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-27[gdb/python] Use GDB_PY_HANDLE_EXCEPTION more oftenTom de Vries12-29/+14
I found a few more places where we can use GDB_PY_HANDLE_EXCEPTION. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-27[gdb/symtab] Change DWARF_ERROR from Dwarf Error to DWARF ErrorTom de Vries6-7/+7
It was suggested here [1] that the canonical prefix for dwarf errors should not be "Dwarf Error: ", given that the canonical spelling is DWARF instead of Dwarf. Fix this by using "DWARF Error: " instead. Given the use of DWARF_ERROR_PREFIX, that needs to be changed only in a single location. Tested on x86_64-linux. Suggested-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2024-August/211258.html
2024-08-27[gdb/symtab] Use DWARF_ERROR_PREFIXTom de Vries3-105/+157
Result of: ... $ sed -i 's/"Dwarf Error: /DWARF_ERROR_PREFIX\n"/' gdb/dwarf2/* ... and manually fixing indentation. No functional changes. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-27[gdb/symtab] Add gdb/dwarf2/error.hTom de Vries1-0/+29
Add a new header file gdb/dwarf2/error.h, containing macros: - DWARF_ERROR, and - DWARF_ERROR_PREFIX. The DWARF_ERROR_PREFIX is to be used in dwarf errors in a follow-up patch. No functional changes. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-27[gdb/symtab] Use [in module %s] notation more consistently in dwarf errorsTom de Vries1-7/+7
In gdb/dwarf2/read.c, I found a few strings "in module %s": ... $ grep "in module %s" gdb/dwarf2/read.c | fgrep -v '[' "DIE at %s in module %s"), error (_("Dwarf Error: Dummy CU at %s referenced in module %s"), error (_("Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at %s referenced in module %s"), error (_("Dwarf Error: DIE at %s referenced in module %s " error (_("Dwarf Error: Dummy CU at %s referenced in module %s"), error (_("Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at %s referenced in module %s"), ... that are not using the commonly used "[in module %s]" notation. Fix these. In one case, the string was also used in the middle rather than at the end of the message, so fix that as well. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-26Simplify ada_identical_enum_types_pTom Tromey1-6/+3
This patch changes ada_identical_enum_types_p to reuse the field names that are computed earlier in the loop. This is a simple cleanup, but also is useful for a larger change that I'm working on. Tested on x86-64 Fedora 38.
2024-08-26gdb: imply --once if connecting via stdioWilliam Ferreira1-1/+12
Currently, gdbserver hangs after stdin is closed while it tries to write: "Remote side has terminated connection. GDBserver will reopen the connection." This hang disappears if --once is also given. Since the stdin connection won't ever reopen if it's closed, it's safe to assume --once is desired. The gdb.server/server-pipe.exp test was also updated to reflect this change. There is now a second disconnect at the end of the proc, with a tighter-than-normal timeout to catch if the command hangs as it used to. Co-Authored-By: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29796 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-08-26Change message when reaching end of reverse history.Guinevere Larsen12-33/+57
In a record session, when we move backward, GDB switches from normal execution to simulation. Moving forward again, the emulation continues until the end of the reverse history. When the end is reached, the execution stops, and a warning message is shown. This message has been modified to indicate that the forward emulation has reached the end, but the execution can continue as normal, and the recording will also continue. Before this patch, the warning message shown in that case was the same as in the reverse case. This meant that when the end of history was reached in either backward or forward emulation, the same message was displayed: "No more reverse-execution history." This message has changed for these two cases. Backward emulation: "Reached end of recorded history; stopping. Backward execution from here not possible." Forward emulation: "Reached end of recorded history; stopping. Following forward execution will be added to history." The reason for this change is that the initial message was deceiving, for the forward case, making the user believe that forward debugging could not continue. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31224 Reviewed-By: Markus T. Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> (btrace) Approved-By: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2024-08-26gdb, btrace: Fix clang buildFelix Willgerodt1-22/+30
Simon pointed out to me that there are some failures when building with clang, that were caused by my commit commit d894edfcc40e63be9b6efa0950c1752f249f16e5 Author: Felix Willgerodt <felix.willgerodt@intel.com> Date: Mon Feb 18 13:49:25 2019 +0100 btrace: Introduce auxiliary instructions. The errors are: CXX btrace.o gdb/btrace.c:1203:11: error: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Werror,-Wmissing-braces] 1203 | return {(CORE_ADDR) insn.ip, (gdb_byte) insn.size, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | { } gdb/btrace.c:1218:21: error: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Werror,-Wmissing-braces] 1218 | btrace_insn insn {btinfo->aux_data.size () - 1, 0, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | { } gdb/btrace.c:1323:34: error: variable 'bfun' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized] 1323 | handle_pt_aux_insn (btinfo, bfun, *ptw_string, pc); | ^~~~ gdb/btrace.c:1236:35: note: initialize the variable 'bfun' to silence this warning 1236 | struct btrace_function *bfun; | ^ | = nullptr 3 errors generated. make[1]: *** [Makefile:1961: btrace.o] Error 1 This fixes those errors and switches two casts to C++ casts while we are at it. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2024-08-25Recognize -2 as a tombstone value in .debug_lineDmitry Neverov1-5/+8
Commit a8caed5d7faa639a1e6769eba551d15d8ddd9510 handled the tombstone value -1 used by lld (https://reviews.llvm.org/D81784). The referenced lld commit also uses the tombstone value -2 for pre-DWARF-v5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e618ccbf431f6730edb6d1467a127c3a52fd57f7). If not handled, -2 breaks the pc step range calculation and triggers the assertion: gdb/infrun.c:2794: internal-error: resume_1: Assertion `pc_in_thread_step_range (pc, tp)' failed. This commit adds -2 tombstone value and handles it in the same way as -1. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31727 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-23gdb/dwarf2: Check for null abbrev_info ptrAaron Merey2-0/+58
A corrupt debuginfo file can result in a null abbrev_info pointer being passed to cooked_indexer::scan_attributes. This pointer is set to nullptr by peek_die_abbrev when an abbrev of 0 is found. There is no check for whether the abbrev pointer is null and SIGSEGV occurs when attempting to dereference the pointer. An abbrev of 0 normally indicates that the corresponding DIE is a null entry, but scan_attributes expects a non-null DIE. Fix this by throwing an error in cooked_indexer::scan_attributes when peek_die_abbrev returns a nullptr in order to avoid scan_attributes calling itself with a null abbrev. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31478 Co-authored-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-22[gdb/symtab] Return correct reader for top-level CU in ↵Tom de Vries2-15/+80
cooked_indexer::ensure_cu_exists With the test-case included in this patch, we run into: ... $ gdb -q -batch $exec Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 3 in CU at offset 0xdb \ [in module $exec] ... The debug info consists of two CUs: ... Compilation Unit @ offset 0xb2: Length: 0x25 (32-bit) Version: 4 Abbrev Offset: 0x6c Pointer Size: 8 <0><bd>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit) <be> DW_AT_language : 2 (non-ANSI C) <1><bf>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram) <c0> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x4004a7 <c8> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x4004b2 <d0> DW_AT_specification: <0xe8> <1><d4>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_subprogram) <d5> DW_AT_name : main <1><da>: Abbrev Number: 0 Compilation Unit @ offset 0xdb: Length: 0xf (32-bit) Version: 4 Abbrev Offset: 0x86 Pointer Size: 8 <0><e6>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit) <e7> DW_AT_language : 2 (non-ANSI C) <1><e8>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram) <e9> DW_AT_specification: <0xd4> <1><ed>: Abbrev Number: 0 ... where: - DIE 0xbf in CU@0xb2 contains an inter-CU reference to - DIE 0xe8 in CU@0xdb, which contains an inter-CU reference to - DIE 0xd4 back in CU@0xb2. The dwarf error is caused by this bit of code in cooked_indexer::ensure_cu_exists: ... if (per_cu == m_per_cu) return reader; ... The dwarf error happens as follows: - a cutu_reader A is created for CU@0xb2 - using cutu_reader A, the cooked index reader starts indexing dies, with m_per_cu set to CU@0xb2 - while indexing it scans the attributes of DIE 0xbf and encounters the inter-CU reference to DIE 0xe8 - it calls cooked_indexer::ensure_cu_exists, which creates a cutu_reader B for CU@0xdb and returns it - using cutu_reader B, it continues scanning attributes of DIE 0xe8 and encounters the inter-CU reference to DIE 0xd4 - it calls cooked_indexer::ensure_cu_exists, the problematic bit is triggered and cutu_reader B is returned - using cutu_reader B, it continues scanning attributes of DIE 0xd4 - this goes wrong because: - the attributes of the DIE are encoded using the abbreviation table at offset 0x6c, while - the decoding is done using cutu_reader B which uses the abbreviation table at offset 0x86. Fix this by removing the problematic if clause. Since cutu_reader A is not preserved in m_index_storage, cooked_indexer::ensure_cu_exists cannot find it there and creates a duplicate cutu_reader C for CU@0xb2. Fix this in process_psymtab_comp_unit by preserving the cutu_reader A as well in m_index_storage. Tested on x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux. PR symtab/32081 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32081 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Reported-By: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
2024-08-22[gdb] Add const to catch gdb_exceptionTom de Vries5-8/+8
I did a review of lines containing "catch (gdb_exception" and found a few where we can add const. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-22[gdb/python] Eliminate catch(...) in type_to_type_objectTom de Vries1-1/+5
In type_to_type_object we have: ... try { if (type->is_stub ()) type = check_typedef (type); } catch (...) { /* Just ignore failures in check_typedef. */ } ... The catch is supposed to ignore gdb_exception_error, but it ignores any exception. Fix that by only ignoring gdb_exception_error, and handling gdb_exception_quit / gdb_exception_forced_quit using GDB_PY_HANDLE_EXCEPTION. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-08-22[gdb] Add & in catch in svr4_handle_solib_eventTom de Vries1-1/+1
In svr4_handle_solib_event I noticed: ... catch (const gdb_exception_error) ... This seems to be the only place were we do this, elsewhere we have: ... catch (const gdb_exception_error &) ... I suppose the intent of adding '&' is to avoid a copy. I'm not sure if it's necessary given that it's an unnamed const parameter, but I suppose it can't hurt either. Add the '&' here as well. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>