aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-12-01gdb: disable commit resumed in target_killSimon Marchi3-0/+164
New in this version: - Better comment in target_kill - Uncomment line in test to avoid hanging when exiting, when testing on native-extended-gdbserver PR 28275 shows that doing a sequence of: - Run inferior in background (run &) - kill that inferior - Run again We get into this assertion: /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:2590: internal-error: target_wait: Assertion `!proc_target->commit_resumed_state' failed. #0 internal_error_loc (file=0x5606b344e740 "/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c", line=2590, fmt=0x5606b344d6a0 "%s: Assertion `%s' failed.") at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/errors.cc:54 #1 0x00005606b6296475 in target_wait (ptid=..., status=0x7fffb9390630, options=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:2590 #2 0x00005606b5767a98 in startup_inferior (proc_target=0x5606bfccb2a0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>, pid=3884857, ntraps=1, last_waitstatus=0x0, last_ptid=0x0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/nat/fork-inferior.c:482 #3 0x00005606b4e6c9c5 in gdb_startup_inferior (pid=3884857, num_traps=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/fork-child.c:132 #4 0x00005606b50f14a5 in inf_ptrace_target::create_inferior (this=0x5606bfccb2a0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>, exec_file=0x604000039f50 "/home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/test", allargs="", env=0x61500000a580, from_tty=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/inf-ptrace.c:105 #5 0x00005606b53b6d23 in linux_nat_target::create_inferior (this=0x5606bfccb2a0 <the_amd64_linux_nat_target>, exec_file=0x604000039f50 "/home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/test", allargs="", env=0x61500000a580, from_tty=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/linux-nat.c:978 #6 0x00005606b512b79b in run_command_1 (args=0x0, from_tty=1, run_how=RUN_NORMAL) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infcmd.c:468 #7 0x00005606b512c236 in run_command (args=0x0, from_tty=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/infcmd.c:526 When running the kill command, commit_resumed_state for the process_stratum_target (linux-nat, here) is true. After the kill, when there are no more threads, commit_resumed_state is still true, as nothing touches this flag during the kill operation. During the subsequent run command, run_command_1 does: scoped_disable_commit_resumed disable_commit_resumed ("running"); We would think that this would clear the commit_resumed_state flag of our native target, but that's not the case, because scoped_disable_commit_resumed iterates on non-exited inferiors in order to find active process targets. And after the kill, the inferior is exited, and the native target was unpushed from it anyway. So scoped_disable_commit_resumed doesn't touch the commit_resumed_state flag of the native target, it stays true. When reaching target_wait, in startup_inferior (to consume the initial expect stop events while the inferior is starting up and working its way through the shell), commit_resumed_state is true, breaking the contract saying that commit_resumed_state is always false when calling the targets' wait method. (note: to be correct, I think that startup_inferior should toggle commit_resumed between the target_wait and target_resume calls, but I'll ignore that for now) I can see multiple ways to fix this. In the end, we need commit_resumed_state to be cleared by the time we get to that target_wait. It could be done at the end of the kill command, or at the beginning of the run command. To keep things in a coherent state, I'd like to make it so that after the kill command, when the target is left with no threads, its commit_resumed_state flag is left to false. This way, we can keep working with the assumption that a target with no threads (and therefore no running threads) has commit_resumed_state == false. Do this by adding a scoped_disable_commit_resumed in target_kill. It clears the target's commit_resumed_state on entry, and leaves it false if the target does not have any resumed thread on exit. That means, even if the target has another inferior with stopped threads, commit_resumed_state will be left to false, which makes sense. Add a test that tries to cover various combinations of actions done while an inferior is running (and therefore while commit_resumed_state is true on the process target). Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275 Change-Id: I8e6fe6dc1f475055921520e58cab68024039a1e9 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2022-12-01gdbserver: switch to right process in find_one_threadSimon Marchi2-0/+99
New in this version: add a dedicated test. When I do this: $ ./gdb -nx --data-directory=data-directory -q \ /bin/sleep \ -ex "maint set target-non-stop on" \ -ex "tar ext :1234" \ -ex "set remote exec-file /bin/sleep" \ -ex "run 1231 &" \ -ex add-inferior \ -ex "inferior 2" Reading symbols from /bin/sleep... (No debugging symbols found in /bin/sleep) Remote debugging using :1234 Starting program: /bin/sleep 1231 Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target... warning: File transfers from remote targets can be slow. Use "set sysroot" to access files locally instead. Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target... Reading /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a6/7a1408f18db3576757eea210d07ba3fc560dff.debug from remote target... [New inferior 2] Added inferior 2 on connection 1 (extended-remote :1234) [Switching to inferior 2 [<null>] (<noexec>)] (gdb) Reading /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 from remote target... attach 3659848 Attaching to process 3659848 /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/thread.c:85: internal-error: inferior_thread: Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed. Note the "attach" command just above. When doing it on the command-line with a -ex switch, the bug doesn't trigger. The internal error of GDB is actually caused by GDBserver crashing, and the error recovery of GDB is not on point. This patch aims to fix just the GDBserver crash, not the GDB problem. GDBserver crashes with a segfault here: (gdb) bt #0 0x00005555557fb3f4 in find_one_thread (ptid=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.cc:177 #1 0x00005555557fd5cf in thread_db_thread_handle (ptid=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa0>, handle=0x7fffffffc400, handle_len=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.cc:461 #2 0x000055555578a0b6 in linux_process_target::thread_handle (this=0x5555558a64c0 <the_x86_target>, ptid=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa0>, handle=0x7fffffffc400, handle_len=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:6905 #3 0x00005555556dfcc6 in handle_qxfer_threads_worker (thread=0x60b000000510, buffer=0x7fffffffc8a0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1645 #4 0x00005555556e00e6 in operator() (__closure=0x7fffffffc5e0, thread=0x60b000000510) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1696 #5 0x00005555556f54be in for_each_thread<handle_qxfer_threads_proper(buffer*)::<lambda(thread_info*)> >(struct {...}) (func=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/gdbthread.h:159 #6 0x00005555556e0242 in handle_qxfer_threads_proper (buffer=0x7fffffffc8a0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1694 #7 0x00005555556e04ba in handle_qxfer_threads (annex=0x629000000213 "", readbuf=0x621000019100 '\276' <repeats 200 times>..., writebuf=0x0, offset=0, len=4097) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1732 #8 0x00005555556e1989 in handle_qxfer (own_buf=0x629000000200 "qXfer:threads", packet_len=26, new_packet_len_p=0x7fffffffd630) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:2045 #9 0x00005555556e720a in handle_query (own_buf=0x629000000200 "qXfer:threads", packet_len=26, new_packet_len_p=0x7fffffffd630) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:2685 #10 0x00005555556f1a01 in process_serial_event () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4176 #11 0x00005555556f4457 in handle_serial_event (err=0, client_data=0x0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4514 #12 0x0000555555820f56 in handle_file_event (file_ptr=0x607000000250, ready_mask=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:573 #13 0x0000555555821895 in gdb_wait_for_event (block=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:694 #14 0x000055555581f533 in gdb_do_one_event (mstimeout=-1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:264 #15 0x00005555556ec9fb in start_event_loop () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3512 #16 0x00005555556f0769 in captured_main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe0d8) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3992 #17 0x00005555556f0e3f in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe0d8) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4078 The reason is a wrong current process when find_one_thread is called. The current process is the 2nd one, which was just attached. It does not yet have thread_db data (proc->priv->thread_db is nullptr). As we iterate on all threads of all process to fulfull the qxfer:threads:read request, we get to a thread of process 1 for which we haven't read thread_db information yet (lwp_info::thread_known is false), so we get into find_one_thread. find_one_thread uses `current_process ()->priv->thread_db`, assuming the current process matches the ptid passed as a parameter, which is wrong. A segfault happens when trying to dereference that thread_db pointer. Fix this by making find_one_thread not assume what the current process / current thread is. If it needs to call into libthread_db, which we know will try to read memory from the current process, then temporarily set the current process. In the case where the thread is already know and we return early, we don't need to switch process. Add a test to reproduce this specific situation. Change-Id: I09b00883e8b73b7e5f89d0f47cb4e9c0f3d6caaa Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2022-12-01gdb: fix assert when quitting GDB while a thread is steppingAndrew Burgess2-0/+57
This commit addresses one of the issues identified in PR gdb/28275. Bug gdb/28275 identifies a number of situations in which this assert: Assertion `!proc_target->commit_resumed_state' failed. could be triggered. There's actually a number of similar places where this assert is found in GDB, the two of interest in gdb/28275 are in target_wait and target_stop. In one of the comments: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275#c1 steps to trigger the assertion within target_stop were identified when using a modified version of the gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp test script. In the gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp test, we attach to a multi-threaded inferior, and continue the inferior in asynchronous (background) mode. Each thread is continuously hitting a conditional breakpoint where the condition is always false. While the inferior is running we detach. The goal is that we detach while GDB is performing a step-over for the conditional breakpoint in at least one thread. While detaching, if a step-over is in progress, then GDB has to complete the step over before we can detach. This involves calling target_stop and target_wait (see prepare_for_detach). As far as gdb/28275 is concerned, the interesting part here, is the the process_stratum_target::commit_resumed_state variable must be false when target_stop and target_wait are called. This is currently ensured because, in detach_command (infrun.c), we create an instance of scoped_disable_commit_resumed, this ensures that when target_detach is called, ::commit_resumed_state will be false. The modification to the test that I propose here, and which exposed the bug, is that, instead of using "detach" to detach from the inferior, we instead use "quit". Quitting GDB after attaching to an inferior will cause GDB to first detach, and then exit. When we quit GDB we end up calling target_detach via a different code path, the stack looks like: #0 target_detach #1 kill_or_detach #2 quit_force #3 quit_command Along this path there is no scoped_disable_commit_resumed created. ::commit_resumed_state can be true when we reach prepare_for_detach, which calls target_wait and target_stop, so the assertion will trigger. In this commit, I propose fixing this by adding the creation of a scoped_disable_commit_resumed into target_detach. This will ensure that ::commit_resumed_state is false when calling prepare_for_detach from within target_detach. I did consider placing the scoped_disable_commit_resumed in prepare_for_detach, however, placing it in target_detach ensures that the target's commit_resumed_state flag is left to false if the detached inferior was the last one for that target. It's the same rationale as for patch "gdb: disable commit resumed in target_kill" that comes later in this series, but for detach instead of kill. detach_command still includes a scoped_disable_commit_resumed too, but I think it is still relevant to cover the resumption at the end of the function. Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28275 Change-Id: Ie128f7aba6ef0e018859275eca372e6ea738e96f
2022-12-01gdb/testsuite: refactor gdb.threads/detach-step-over.expAndrew Burgess1-100/+138
Factor out some bits of gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp to procs in preparation to adding some new variations of the test. Rename the existing "test" proc and make it use proc_with_prefix. Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Change-Id: Ib4412545c81c8556029e0f7bfa9dd48d7a9f3189
2022-12-01gdb/testsuite: remove global declarations in gdb.threads/detach-step-over.expSimon Marchi1-23/+17
Before doing further changes to this file, change to use the :: notation instead of declaring global variables with the `global` keyword. Change-Id: I72301fd8f4693fea61aac054ba17245a1f4442fb Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2022-12-01gdb: testsuite: add new gdb_attach to check "attach" commandTiezhu Yang1-0/+26
This commit adds new gdb_attach to centralize the failure checking of "attach" command. Return 0 if attach failed, otherwise return 1. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Change-Id: I553cf386cef60c67d38e331904b4aa01e132104a
2022-07-11Fix core-file -> detach -> crash (corefiles/29275)Pedro Alves2-6/+33
After loading a core file, you're supposed to be able to use "detach" to unload the core file. That unfortunately regressed starting with GDB 11, with these commits: 1192f124a308 - gdb: generalize commit_resume, avoid commit-resuming when threads have pending statuses 408f66864a1a - detach in all-stop with threads running resulting in a GDB crash: ... Thread 1 "gdb" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000555555e842bf in maybe_set_commit_resumed_all_targets () at ../../src/gdb/infrun.c:2899 2899 if (proc_target->commit_resumed_state) (top-gdb) bt #0 0x0000555555e842bf in maybe_set_commit_resumed_all_targets () at ../../src/gdb/infrun.c:2899 #1 0x0000555555e848bf in scoped_disable_commit_resumed::reset (this=0x7fffffffd440) at ../../src/gdb/infrun.c:3023 #2 0x0000555555e84a0c in scoped_disable_commit_resumed::reset_and_commit (this=0x7fffffffd440) at ../../src/gdb/infrun.c:3049 #3 0x0000555555e739cd in detach_command (args=0x0, from_tty=1) at ../../src/gdb/infcmd.c:2791 #4 0x0000555555c0ba46 in do_simple_func (args=0x0, from_tty=1, c=0x55555662a600) at ../../src/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:95 #5 0x0000555555c112b0 in cmd_func (cmd=0x55555662a600, args=0x0, from_tty=1) at ../../src/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:2514 #6 0x0000555556173b1f in execute_command (p=0x5555565c5916 "", from_tty=1) at ../../src/gdb/top.c:699 The code that crashes looks like: static void maybe_set_commit_resumed_all_targets () { scoped_restore_current_thread restore_thread; for (inferior *inf : all_non_exited_inferiors ()) { process_stratum_target *proc_target = inf->process_target (); if (proc_target->commit_resumed_state) ^^^^^^^^^^^ With 'proc_target' above being null. all_non_exited_inferiors filters out inferiors that have pid==0. We get here at the end of detach_command, after core_target::detach has already run, at which point the inferior _should_ have pid==0 and no process target. It is clear it no longer has a process target, but, it still has a pid!=0 somehow. The reason the inferior still has pid!=0, is that core_target::detach just unpushes, and relies on core_target::close to actually do the getting rid of the core and exiting the inferior. The problem with that is that detach_command grabs an extra strong reference to the process stratum target, so the unpush_target inside core_target::detach doesn't actually result in a call to core_target::close. Fix this my moving the cleaning up the core inferior to a shared routine called by both core_target::close and core_target::detach. We still need to cleanup the inferior from within core_file::close because there are paths to it that want to get rid of the core without going through detach. E.g., "core-file" -> "run". This commit includes a new test added to gdb.base/corefile.exp to cover the "core-file core" -> "detach" scenario. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29275 Change-Id: Ic42bdd03182166b19f598428b0dbc2ce6f67c893
2022-05-01Bump GDB's version number to 12.1.90.DATE-git.Joel Brobecker2-2/+2
This commit changes gdb/version.in to 12.1.90.DATE-git. This commit also makes the following changes in gdb/testsuite: * gdb.base/default.exp: Change $_gdb_minor to 2.
2022-05-01Set GDB version number to 12.1.gdb-12.1-releaseJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit changes gdb/version.in to 12.1.
2022-04-24gdb: move setbuf calls out of gdb_readline_no_editing_callbackAndrew Burgess2-13/+39
After this commit: commit d08cbc5d3203118da5583296e49273cf82378042 Date: Wed Dec 22 12:57:44 2021 +0000 gdb: unbuffer all input streams when not using readline Issues were reported with some MS-Windows hosts, see the thread starting here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-March/187004.html Filed in bugzilla as: PR mi/29002 The problem seems to be that calling setbuf on terminal file handles is not always acceptable, see this mail for more details: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-April/187310.html This commit does two things, first moving the setbuf calls out of gdb_readline_no_editing_callback so that we don't end up calling setbuf so often. Then, for MS-Windows hosts, we don't call setbuf for terminals, this appears to resolve the issues that have been reported. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29002
2022-04-21gdb: fix 'remote show FOO-packet' aliasesAndrew Burgess2-4/+11
The following behaviour was observed in GDB: (gdb) show remote X-packet Support for the `p' packet is auto-detected, currently unknown. Note the message mentions the 'p' packet. This is a regression since this commit: commit 8579fd136a614985bd27f20539c7bb7c5a51287d Date: Mon Nov 8 14:58:46 2021 +0000 gdb/gdbsupport: make xstrprintf and xstrvprintf return a unique_ptr Before this commit the behaviour was: (gdb) show remote X-packet Support for the `X' packet is auto-detected, currently unknown. The problem was caused by a failed attempt to ensure that some allocated strings were deleted when GDB exits. The code in the above commit attempted to make use of 'static' to solve this problem, however, the solution was just wrong. In this new commit I instead allocate a static vector into which all the allocated strings are stored, this ensures the strings are released when GDB exits (which makes output from tools like valgrind cleaner), but each string within the vector can be unique, which fixes the regression.
2022-04-15[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.ada/float-bits.exp with -m32Tom de Vries1-5/+22
With test-case gdb.ada/float-bits.exp and native we get: ... (gdb) print 16llf#7FFFF7FF4054A56FA5B99019A5C8#^M $9 = 5.0e+25^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/float-bits.exp: print 16llf#7FFFF7FF4054A56FA5B99019A5C8# ... but with target board unix/-m32 we have instead: ... (gdb) print 16llf#7FFFF7FF4054A56FA5B99019A5C8#^M Cannot export value 2596145952482202326224873165792712 as 96-bits \ unsigned integer (must be between 0 and 79228162514264337593543950335)^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/float-bits.exp: print 16llf#7FFFF7FF4054A56FA5B99019A5C8# ... Fix this by testing whether 16llf is supported by doing ptype long_long_float which gets us either: ... type = <16-byte float>^M ... or: ... type = <12-byte float>^M ... Tested on x86_64-linux with native and unix/-m32. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29041
2022-04-15[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.go/methods.exp with check-readmoreTom de Vries1-1/+1
When running test-case gdb.go/methods.exp with make check we have: ... (gdb) break main.T.Foo^M Function "main.T.Foo" not defined.^M Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n^M (gdb) XFAIL: gdb.go/methods.exp: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at main.T.Foo ... but with make check-readmore the XFAIL fails to trigger: ... (gdb) break main.T.Foo^M Function "main.T.Foo" not defined.^M Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.go/methods.exp: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at main.T.Foo ... This happens because this gdb_test_multiple "maintenance print symbols" regexp: ... -re "\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { ... matches the entire command output. Fix this by adding the missing ^ at the regexp start. Tested on x86_64-linux. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29064
2022-04-14gdb/testsuite: Fix race in gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.expLancelot SIX1-2/+2
Pedro Alves warned me that there is a race in gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp making the test sometimes fail on his setup. This can be reliably reproduced using : make check-read1 TESTS="gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp" The relevant part of the gdb.log file is: return 35 Function 'foo' does not follow the target calling convention. If you continue, setting the return value will probably lead to unpredictable behaviors. Make foo return now? (y or n) PASS: gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp: return 35 n Not confirmed (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp: finish The issue is that when doing the test for "return 35", the DejaGnu test sends "n" (to tell GDB not to perform the return action) but never consumes the "Not confirmed" acknowledgment sent by GDB. Later, when trying to do the next test, DejaGnu tries to match the leftover output from the "return" test. As this output is not expected, the test fails. Fix by using gdb_test to send the "n" answer and match the confirmation and consume all output to the prompt. Also do minor adjustments to the main regex: - Remove the leading ".*" which is not required. - Ensure that the "?" from the question is properly escaped. Tested on x86_64-gnu-linux, using - make check TESTS="gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp" - make check-read1 TESTS="gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp" - make check-readmore TESTS="gdb.dwarf2/calling-convention.exp" Co-authored-by: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> Change-Id: I42858b13db2cbd623c5c1739de65ad423e0c0938
2022-04-14Silence -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning from target_waitstatusTom Tromey1-1/+1
Currently, one use of target_waitstatus yields a warning: target/waitstatus.h: In function 'void stop_all_threads()': target/waitstatus.h:175:13: warning: 'ws.target_waitstatus::m_value' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 175 | m_value = other.m_value; | ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This patch silences the warning. I tried the "volatile member" approach that was used for gdb::optional, but that didn't work, so this patch simply initializes the member.
2022-04-14Fix regression on Windows with WOW64Tom Tromey1-1/+5
Internally at AdaCore, we recently started testing a 64-bit gdb debugging 32-bit processes. This failed with gdb head, but not with gdb 11. The tests fail like this: Starting program: [...].exe warning: Could not load shared library symbols for WOW64_IMAGE_SECTION. Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"? warning: Could not load shared library symbols for WOW64_IMAGE_SECTION. Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"? warning: Could not load shared library symbols for NOT_AN_IMAGE. Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"? warning: Could not load shared library symbols for NOT_AN_IMAGE. Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"? After some debugging and bisecting, to my surprise the bug was introduced by commit 183be222 ("gdb, gdbserver: make target_waitstatus safe"). The problem occurs in handle_exception. Previously the code did: - ourstatus->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED; [...] case EXCEPTION_BREAKPOINT: [...] - ourstatus->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_SPURIOUS; [...] /* FALLTHROUGH */ case STATUS_WX86_BREAKPOINT: DEBUG_EXCEPTION_SIMPLE ("EXCEPTION_BREAKPOINT"); - ourstatus->value.sig = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP; [...] - last_sig = ourstatus->value.sig; However, in the new code, the fallthrough case does: + ourstatus->set_stopped (GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP); ... which changes the 'kind' in 'ourstatus' after falling through. This patch rearranges the 'last_sig' setting to more closely match what was done before (this is probably not strictly needed but also seemed harmless), and removes the fall-through in the 'ignore_first_breakpoint' case when __x86_64__ is defined.
2022-04-14[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/annota1.exp with pieTom de Vries1-0/+2
Since commit 359efc2d894 ("[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.base/annota1.exp more robust") we see this fail with target board unix/-fPIE/-pie: ... FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: run until main breakpoint (timeout) ... The problem is that the commit makes the number and order of matched annotations fixed, while between target boards unix and unix/-fPIE/-pie there is a difference: ... \032\032post-prompt Starting program: outputs/gdb.base/annota1/annota1 +\032\032breakpoints-invalid + \032\032starting \032\032frames-invalid ... Fix this by optionally matching the additional annotation. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-04-14[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.base/annota1.exp more robustTom de Vries1-24/+47
On openSUSE Tumbleweed I run into: ... FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: run until main breakpoint (timeout) ... The problem is that the libthread_db message occurs at a location where it's not expected: ... Starting program: outputs/gdb.base/annota1/annota1 ^M ^M ^Z^Zstarting^M ^M ^Z^Zframes-invalid^M [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]^M Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".^M ^M ^Z^Zbreakpoints-invalid^M ^M ... Fix this by making the matching more robust: - rewrite the regexp such that each annotation is on a single line, starting with \r\n\032\032 and ending with \r\n - add a regexp variable optional_re, that matches all possible optional output, and use it as a separator in the first part of the regexp Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-04-14[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/stap-probe.exp with read1Tom de Vries1-2/+2
When running test-case gdb.base/stap-probe.exp with make target check-read1, I run into this and similar: ... FAIL: gdb.base/stap-probe.exp: without semaphore, not optimized: \ info probes stap (timeout) ... Fix this by using gdb_test_lines instead of gdb_test. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-04-14[gdb/testsuite] Detect 'No MPX support'Tom de Vries1-0/+23
On openSUSE Leap 15.3, mpx support has been disabled for m32, so I run into: ... (gdb) run ^M Starting program: outputs/gdb.arch/i386-mpx/i386-mpx ^M [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]^M Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".^M No MPX support^M ... and eventually into all sort of fails in this and other mpx test-cases. Fix this by detecting the "No MPX support" message in have_mpx. Tested on x86_64-linux with target boards unix and unix/-m32.
2022-04-13[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lines.exp for m32 pieTom de Vries1-1/+1
As reported in PR29043, when running test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lines.exp with target board unix/-m32/-fPIE/-pie, we run into: ... Breakpoint 2, 0x56555540 in bar ()^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lines.exp: cv=2: cdw=32: lv=2: ldw=32: \ continue to breakpoint: foo \(1\) next^M Single stepping until exit from function bar,^M which has no line number information.^M 0x56555587 in main ()^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lines.exp: cv=2: cdw=32: lv=2: ldw=32: \ next to foo (2) ... The problem is that the bar breakpoint ends up at an unexpected location because: - the synthetic debug info is incomplete and doesn't provide line info for the prologue part of the function, so consequently gdb uses the i386 port prologue skipper to get past the prologue - the i386 port prologue skipper doesn't get past a get_pc_thunk call. Work around this in the test-case by breaking on bar_label instead. Tested on x86_64-linux with target boards unix, unix/-m32, unix/-fPIE/-pie and unix/-m32/-fPIE/-pie.
2022-04-13gdb/testsuite: use nopie in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inline-param.expSimon Marchi1-3/+5
I see this failure: (gdb) run ^M Starting program: /home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inline-param/dw2-inline-param ^M Warning:^M Cannot insert breakpoint 1.^M Cannot access memory at address 0x113b^M ^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inline-param.exp: runto: run to *0x113b The test loads the binary in GDB, grabs the address of a symbol, strips the binary, reloads it in GDB, runs the program, and then tries to place a breakpoint at that address. The problem is that the binary is built as position independent, so the address GDB grabs in the first place isn't where the code ends up after running. Fix this by linking the binary as non-position-independent. The alternative would be to compute the relocated address where to place the breakpoint, but that's not very straightforward, unfortunately. I was confused for a while, I was trying to load the binary in GDB manually to get the symbol address, but GDB was telling me the symbol could not be found. Meanwhile, it clearly worked in gdb.log. The thing is that GDB strips the binary in-place, so we don't have access to the intermediary binary with symbols. Change the test to output the stripped binary to a separate file instead. Change-Id: I66c56293df71b1ff49cf748d6784bd0e935211ba
2022-04-12Fix bug in Ada number lexingTom Tromey2-2/+5
On irc, Pedro pointed out that Ada couldn't properly handle 0xffffffffffffffff. This used to work, but is a regression due to some patches I wrote in the Ada lexer. This patch fixes the bug.
2022-04-12Remove "Ada Settings" node from the manualTom Tromey1-32/+0
A while back, I sent a patch to unify the Ada varsize-limit setting with the more generic max-value-size: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-September/182004.html However, it turns out I somehow neglected to send part of the patch. Internally, I also removed the "Ada Settings" node from the manual, as it only documents the obsolete setting. This patch removes this text.
2022-04-11Handle TLS variable lookups when using separate debug files.John Baldwin2-5/+5
Commit df22c1e5d53c38f38bce6072bb46de240f9e0e2b handled the case that a separate debug file was passed as the objfile for a shared library to svr4_fetch_objfile_link_map. However, a separate debug file can also be passed for TLS variables in the main executable. In addition, frv_fetch_objfile_link_map also expects to be passed the original objfile rather than a separate debug file, so pull the code to resolve a separate debug file to the main objfile up into target_translate_tls_address.
2022-04-06gdb: don't copy entirely optimized out values in value_copySimon Marchi2-5/+25
Bug 28980 shows that trying to value_copy an entirely optimized out value causes an internal error. The original bug report involves MI and some Python pretty printer, and is quite difficult to reproduce, but another easy way to reproduce (that is believed to be equivalent) was proposed: $ ./gdb -q -nx --data-directory=data-directory -ex "py print(gdb.Value(gdb.Value(5).type.optimized_out()))" /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/value.c:1731: internal-error: value_copy: Assertion `arg->contents != nullptr' failed. This is caused by 5f8ab46bc691 ("gdb: constify parameter of value_copy"). It added an assertion that the contents buffer is allocated if the value is not lazy: if (!value_lazy (val)) { gdb_assert (arg->contents != nullptr); This was based on the comment on value::contents, which suggest that this is the case: /* Actual contents of the value. Target byte-order. NULL or not valid if lazy is nonzero. */ gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<gdb_byte> contents; However, it turns out that it can also be nullptr also if the value is entirely optimized out, for example on exit of allocate_optimized_out_value. That function creates a lazy value, marks the entire value as optimized out, and then clears the lazy flag. But contents remains nullptr. This wasn't a problem for value_copy before, because it was calling value_contents_all_raw on the input value, which caused contents to be allocated before doing the copy. This means that the input value to value_copy did not have its contents allocated on entry, but had it allocated on exit. The result value had it allocated on exit. And that we copied bytes for an entirely optimized out value (i.e. meaningless bytes). From here I see two choices: 1. respect the documented invariant that contents is nullptr only and only if the value is lazy, which means making allocate_optimized_out_value allocate contents 2. extend the cases where contents can be nullptr to also include values that are entirely optimized out (note that you could still have some entirely optimized out values that do have contents allocated, it depends on how they were created) and adjust value_copy accordingly Choice #1 is safe, but less efficient: it's not very useful to allocate a buffer for an entirely optimized out value. It's even a bit less efficient than what we had initially, because values coming out of allocate_optimized_out_value would now always get their contents allocated. Choice #2 would be more efficient than what we had before: giving an optimized out value without allocated contents to value_copy would result in an optimized out value without allocated contents (and the input value would still be without allocated contents on exit). But it's more risky, since it's difficult to ensure that all users of the contents (through the various_contents* accessors) are all fine with that new invariant. In this patch, I opt for choice #2, since I think it is a better direction than choice #1. #1 would be a pessimization, and if we go this way, I doubt that it will ever be revisited, it will just stay that way forever. Add a selftest to test this. I initially started to write it as a Python test (since the reproducer is in Python), but a selftest is more straightforward. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28980 Change-Id: I6e2f5c0ea804fafa041fcc4345d47064b5900ed7
2022-04-05gdb/testsuite: fix intermittent failures in gdb.mi/mi-cmd-user-context.expSimon Marchi2-5/+78
I got failures like this once on a CI: frame^M &"frame\n"^M ~"#0 child_sub_function () at /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_build/arch/amd64/target_board/unix/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/user-selected-context-sync.c:33\n"^M ~"33\t dummy = !dummy; /* thread loop line */\n"^M ^done^M (gdb) ^M FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-cmd-user-context.exp: frame 1 (unexpected output) The problem is that the test expects the following regexp: ".*#0 0x.*" And that typically works, when the output of the frame command looks like: #0 0x00005555555551bb in child_sub_function () at ... Note the lack of hexadecimal address in the failing case. Whether or not the hexadecimal address is printed (roughly) depends on whether the current PC is at the beginning of a line. So depending on where thread 2 was when GDB stopped it (after thread 1 hit its breakpoint), we can get either output. Adjust the regexps to not expect an hexadecimal prefix (0x) but a function name instead (either child_sub_function or child_function). That one is always printed, and is also a good check that we are in the frame we expect. Note that for test "frame 5", we are showing a pthread frame (on my system), so the function name is internal to pthread, not something we can rely on. In that case, it's almost certain that we are not at the beginning of a line, or that we don't have debug info, so I think it's fine to expect the hex prefix. And for test "frame 6", it's ok to _not_ expect a hex prefix (what the test currently does), since we are showing thread 1, which has hit a breakpoint placed at the beginning of a line. When testing this, Tom de Vries pointed out that the current test code doesn't ensure that the child threads are in child_sub_function when they are stopped. If the scheduler chooses so, it is possible for the child threads to be still in the pthread_barrier_wait or child_function functions when they get stopped. So that would be another racy failure waiting to happen. The only way I can think of to ensure the child threads are in the child_sub_function function when they get stopped is to synchronize the threads using some variables instead of pthread_barrier_wait. So, replace the barrier with an array of flags (one per child thread). Each child thread flips its flag in child_sub_function to allow the main thread to make progress and eventually hit the breakpoint. I copied user-selected-context-sync.c to a new mi-cmd-user-context.c and made modifications to that, to avoid interfering with user-selected-context-sync.exp. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29025 Change-Id: I919673bbf9927158beb0e8b7e9e980b8d65eca90
2022-04-04[gdb/testsuite] Fix KPASS in gdb.ada/arrayptr.expTom de Vries1-16/+45
On openSUSE Leap 15.3 I run into: ... KPASS: gdb.ada/arrayptr.exp: scenario=minimal: print pa_ptr.all \ (PRMS minimal encodings) KPASS: gdb.ada/arrayptr.exp: scenario=minimal: print pa_ptr(3) \ (PRMS minimal encodings) KPASS: gdb.ada/arrayptr.exp: scenario=minimal: print pa_ptr.all(3) \ (PRMS minimal encodings) ... The test-case KFAILs some tests. However, the analysis in the corresponding PR talks of a compiler problem, so it should use XFAILs instead. The KFAILs are setup for pre-gcc-12, but apparantly the fix has been backported to system compiler 7.5.0, hence the KPASS. Fix this by: - using an XFAIL instead of a KFAIL - matching the specific gdb output that corresponds to the XFAILs (reproduced on Fedora 34). Tested on x86_64-linux, specifically openSUSE Leap 15.3 and Fedora 34.
2022-03-31Fix procfs.c compilationRainer Orth1-0/+1
procfs.c doesn't compile on Solaris: /vol/src/gnu/gdb/hg/master/local/gdb/procfs.c: In member function ‘virtual bool procfs_target::info_proc(const char*, info_proc_what)’: /vol/src/gnu/gdb/hg/master/local/gdb/procfs.c:3302:3: error: ‘gdb_argv’ was not declared in this scope 3302 | gdb_argv built_argv (args); | ^~~~~~~~ /vol/src/gnu/gdb/hg/master/local/gdb/procfs.c:3303:20: error: ‘built_argv’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘buildargv’? 3303 | for (char *arg : built_argv) | ^~~~~~~~~~ | buildargv Fixed by including "gdbsupport/buildargv.h". Tested on amd64-pc-solaris2.11, sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11.
2022-03-29gdb/mi: fix use after free of frame_info causing spurious notificationsAndrew Burgess1-10/+34
In commit: commit a2757c4ed693cef4ecc4dcdcb2518353eb6b3c3f Date: Wed Mar 16 15:08:22 2022 +0000 gdb/mi: consistently notify user when GDB/MI client uses -thread-select Changes were made to GDB to address some inconsistencies in when notifications are sent from a MI terminal to a CLI terminal (when multiple terminals are in use, see new-ui command). Unfortunately, in order to track when the currently selected frame has changed, that commit grabs a frame_info pointer before and after an MI command has executed, and compares the pointers to see if the frame has changed. This is not safe. If the frame cache is deleted for any reason then the frame_info pointer captured before the command started, is no longer valid, and any comparisons based on that pointer are undefined. This was leading to random test failures for some folk, see: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-March/186867.html This commit changes GDB so we no longer hold frame_info pointers, but instead store the frame_id and frame_level, this is safe even when the frame cache is flushed.
2022-03-28Add Rust parser check for end of expressionTom Tromey2-1/+7
I noticed that "print 5," passed in Rust -- the parser wasn't checking that the entire input was used. This patch fixes the problem. This in turn pointed out another bug in the parser, namely that it didn't lex the next token after handling a string token. This is also fixed here.
2022-03-20Bump GDB's version number to 12.0.90.DATE-git.Joel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit changes gdb/version.in to 12.0.90.DATE-git.
2022-03-20Set GDB version number to 12.0.90.Joel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit changes gdb/version.in to 12.0.90.
2022-03-20Update gdb/NEWS to say "in GDB 12" instead of "since GDB 11"Joel Brobecker1-1/+1
2022-03-20Bump version to 12.0.90.DATE-git.Joel Brobecker1-1/+1
Now that the GDB 12 branch has been created, this commit bumps the version number in gdb/version.in to 12.0.90.DATE-git For the record, the GDB 12 branch was created from commit 2be64de603f8b3ae359d2d3fbf5db0e79869f32b.
2022-03-18gdb/python: remove gdb._mi_commands dictSimon Marchi7-208/+105
The motivation for this patch is the fact that py-micmd.c doesn't build with Python 2, due to PyDict_GetItemWithError being a Python 3-only function: CXX python/py-micmd.o /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/python/py-micmd.c: In function ‘int micmdpy_uninstall_command(micmdpy_object*)’: /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/python/py-micmd.c:430:20: error: ‘PyDict_GetItemWithError’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘PyDict_GetItemString’? 430 | PyObject *curr = PyDict_GetItemWithError (mi_cmd_dict.get (), | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | PyDict_GetItemString A first solution to fix this would be to try to replace PyDict_GetItemWithError equivalent Python 2 code. But I looked at why we are doing this in the first place: it is to maintain the `gdb._mi_commands` Python dictionary that we use as a `name -> gdb.MICommand object` map. Since the `gdb._mi_commands` dictionary is never actually used in Python, it seems like a lot of trouble to use a Python object for this. My first idea was to replace it with a C++ map (std::unordered_map<std::string, gdbpy_ref<micmdpy_object>>). While implementing this, I realized we don't really need this map at all. The mi_command_py objects registered in the main MI command table can own their backing micmdpy_object (that's a gdb.MICommand, but seen from the C++ code). To know whether an mi_command is an mi_command_py, we can use a dynamic cast. Since there's one less data structure to maintain, there are less chances of messing things up. - Change mi_command_py::m_pyobj to a gdbpy_ref, the mi_command_py is now what keeps the MICommand alive. - Set micmdpy_object::mi_command in the constructor of mi_command_py. If mi_command_py manages setting/clearing that field in swap_python_object, I think it makes sense that it also takes care of setting it initially. - Move a bunch of checks from micmdpy_install_command to swap_python_object, and make them gdb_asserts. - In micmdpy_install_command, start by doing an mi_cmd_lookup. This is needed to know whether there's a Python MI command already registered with that name. But we can already tell if there's a non-Python command registered with that name. Return an error if that happens, rather than waiting for insert_mi_cmd_entry to fail. Change the error message to "name is already in use" rather than "may already be in use", since it's more precise. I asked Andrew about the original intent of using a Python dictionary object to hold the command objects. The reason was to make sure the objects get destroyed when the Python runtime gets finalized, not later. Holding the objects in global C++ data structures and not doing anything more means that the held Python objects will be decref'd after the Python interpreter has been finalized. That's not desirable. I tried it and it indeed segfaults. Handle this by adding a gdbpy_finalize_micommands function called in finalize_python. This is the mirror of gdbpy_initialize_micommands called in do_start_initialization. In there, delete all Python MI commands. I think it makes sense to do it this way: if it was somehow possible to unload Python support from GDB in the middle of a session we'd want to unregister any Python MI command. Otherwise, these MI commands would be backed with a stale PyObject or simply nothing. Delete tests that were related to `gdb._mi_commands`. Co-Authored-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> Change-Id: I060d5ebc7a096c67487998a8a4ca1e8e56f12cd3
2022-03-18Fix crash with stepi, no debug info, and "set debug infrun 1"Pedro Alves1-1/+2
A stepi in a function without debug info with "set debug infrun 1" crashes GDB since commit c8353d682f69 (gdb/infrun: some extra infrun debug print statements), due to a reference to "tp->current_symtab->filename" when tp->current_symtab is null. This commit adds the missing null check. The output in this case becomes: [infrun] set_step_info: symtab = <null>, line = 0, step_frame_id = {stack=0x7fffffffd980,code=0x0000000000456c30,!special}, step_stack_frame_id = {stack=0x7fffffffd980,code=0x0000000000456c30,!special} Change-Id: I5171a9d222bc7e15b9dba2feaba7d55c7acd99f8
2022-03-18Implement gdbarch_stack_frame_destroyed_p for aarch64Tom Tromey1-0/+22
The internal AdaCore testsuite has a test that checks that an out-of-scope watchpoint is deleted. This fails on some aarch64 configurations, reporting an extra stop: (gdb) continue Continuing. Thread 3 hit Watchpoint 2: result Old value = 64 New value = 0 0x0000000040021648 in pck.get_val (seed=0, off_by_one=false) at [...]/pck.adb:13 13 end Get_Val; I believe what is happening here is that the variable is stored at: <efa> DW_AT_location : 2 byte block: 91 7c (DW_OP_fbreg: -4) and the extra stop is reported just before a return, when the ldp instruction is executed: 0x0000000040021644 <+204>: ldp x29, x30, [sp], #48 0x0000000040021648 <+208>: ret This instruction modifies the frame base calculation, and so the test picks up whatever memory is pointed to in the callee frame. Implementing the gdbarch hook gdbarch_stack_frame_destroyed_p fixes this problem. As usual with this sort of patch, it has passed internal testing, but I don't have a good way to try it with dejagnu. So, I don't know whether some existing test covers this. I suspect there must be one, but it's also worth noting that this test passes for aarch64 in some configurations -- I don't know what causes one to fail and another to succeed.
2022-03-18gdb: run black to format some Python filesSimon Marchi2-2/+4
Seems like some leftovers from previous commits. Change-Id: I7155ccdf7a4fef83bcb3d60320252c3628efdb83
2022-03-17Remove fall throughs in core_target::xfer_partial.John Baldwin1-2/+2
The cases for TARGET_OBJECT_LIBRARIES and TARGET_OBJECT_LIBRARIES_AIX can try to fetch different data objects (such as TARGET_OBJECT_SIGNAL_INFO) if gdbarch methods for the requested data aren't present. Return with TARGET_XFER_E_IO if the gdbarch method isn't present instead.
2022-03-17gdb: Remove support for S+corePedro Alves5-1586/+5
GCC removed support for score back in 2014 already. Back then, we basically agreed about removing it from GDB too, but it ended up being forgotten. See: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb/2014-October/044643.html Following through this time around. Change-Id: I5b25a1ff7bce7b150d6f90f4c34047fae4b1f8b4
2022-03-17Add another test for Ada Wide_Wide_StringTom Tromey4-1/+17
In an earlier patch, I had written that I wanted to add this test: ptype Wide_Wide_String'("literal") ... but that it failed with the distro GNAT. Further investigation showed that it could be made to work by adding a function using Wide_Wide_String to the program -- this caused the type to end up in the debug info. This patch adds the test. I'm checking this in.
2022-03-16gdb: work around prompt corruption caused by bracketed-paste-modeAndrew Burgess3-1/+116
In this commit: commit b4f26d541aa7224b70d363932e816e6e1a857633 Date: Tue Mar 2 13:42:37 2021 -0700 Import GNU Readline 8.1 We imported readline 8.1 into GDB. As a consequence bug PR cli/28833 was reported. This bug spotted that, when the user terminated GDB by sending EOF (usually bound to Ctrl+d), the last prompt would become corrupted. Here's what happens, the user is sat at a prompt like this: (gdb) And then the user sends EOF (Ctrl+d), we now see this: quit) ... gdb terminates, and we return to the shell ... Notice the 'quit' was printed over the prompt. This problem is a result of readline 8.1 enabling bracketed paste mode by default. This problem is present in readline 8.0 too, but in that version of readline bracketed paste mode is off by default, so a user will not see the bug unless they specifically enable the feature. Bracketed paste mode is available in readline 7.0 too, but the bug is not present in this version of readline, see below for why. What causes this problem is how readline disables bracketed paste mode. Bracketed paste mode is a terminal feature that is enabled and disabled by readline emitting a specific escape sequence. The problem for GDB is that the escape sequence to disable bracketed paste mode includes a '\r' character at the end, see this thread for more details: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2018-01/msg00097.html The change to add the '\r' character to the escape sequence used to disable bracketed paste mode was introduced between readline 7.0 and readline 8.0, this is why the bug would not occur when using older versions of readline (note: I don't know if its even possible to build GDB using readline 7.0. That really isn't important, I'm just documenting the history of this issue). So, the escape sequence to disable bracketed paste mode is emitted from the readline function rl_deprep_terminal, this is called after the user has entered a complete command and pressed return, or, if the user sends EOF. However, these two cases are slightly different. In the first case, when the user has entered a command and pressed return, the cursor will have moved to the next, empty, line, before readline emits the escape sequence to leave bracketed paste mode. The final '\r' character moves the cursor back to the beginning of this empty line, which is harmless. For the EOF case though, this is not what happens. Instead, the escape sequence to leave bracketed paste mode is emitted on the same line as the prompt. The final '\r' moves the cursor back to the start of the prompt line. This leaves us ready to override the prompt. It is worth noting, that this is not the intended behaviour of readline, in rl_deprep_terminal, readline should emit a '\n' character when EOF is seen. However, due to a bug in readline this does not happen (the _rl_eof_found flag is never set). This is the first readline bug that effects GDB. GDB prints the 'quit' message from command_line_handler (in event-top.c), this function is called (indirectly) from readline to process the complete command line, but also in the EOF case (in which case the command line is set to nullptr). As this is part of the callback to process a complete command, this is called after readline has disabled bracketed paste mode (by calling rl_deprep_terminal). And so, when bracketed paste mode is in use, rl_deprep_terminal leaves the cursor at the start of the prompt line (in the EOF case), and command_line_handler then prints 'quit', which overwrites the prompt. The solution to this problem is to print the 'quit' message earlier, before rl_deprep_terminal is called. This is easy to do by using the rl_deprep_term_function hook. It is this hook that usually calls rl_deprep_terminal, however, if we replace this with a new function, we can print the 'quit' string, and then call rl_deprep_terminal ourselves. This allows the 'quit' to be printed before rl_deprep_terminal is called. The problem here is that there is no way in rl_deprep_terminal to know if readline is processing EOF or not, and as a result, we don't know when we should print 'quit'. This is the second readline bug that effects GDB. Both of these readline issues are discussed in this thread: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2022-02/msg00021.html The result of that thread was that readline was patched to address both of these issues. Now it should be easy to backport the readline fix to GDB's in tree copy of readline, and then change GDB to make use of these fixes to correctly print the 'quit' string. However, we are just about to branch GDB 12, and there is concern from some that changing readline this close to a new release is a risky idea, see this thread: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-March/186391.html So, this commit doesn't change readline at all. Instead, this commit is the smallest possible GDB change in order to avoid the prompt corruption. In this commit I change GDB to print the 'quit' string on the line after the prompt, but only when bracketed paste mode is on. This avoids the overwriting issue, the user sees this: (gdb) quit ... gdb terminates, and returns to the shell ... This isn't ideal, but is better than the existing behaviour. After GDB 12 has branched, we can backport the readline fix, and apply a real fix to GDB. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28833
2022-03-16Reimplement array concatenation for Ada and DTom Tromey7-134/+131
This started as a patch to implement string concatenation for Ada. However, while working on this, I looked at how this code could possibly be called. It turns out there are only two users of concat_operation: Ada and D. So, in addition to implementing this for Ada, this patch rewrites value_concat, removing the odd "concatenate or repeat" semantics, which were completely unused. As Ada and D both seem to represent strings using TYPE_CODE_ARRAY, this removes the TYPE_CODE_STRING code from there as well.
2022-03-16Remove eval_op_concatTom Tromey3-18/+2
eval_op_concat has code to search for an operator overload of BINOP_CONCAT. However, the operator overloading code is specific to C++, which does not have this operator. And, binop_types_user_defined_p rejects this case right at the start, and value_x_binop does not handle this case. I think this code has been dead for a very long time. This patch removes it and hoists the remaining call into concatenation::evaluate, removing eval_op_concat entirely.
2022-03-16Ada support for wide stringsTom Tromey3-6/+63
This adds some basic support for Wide_String and Wide_Wide_String to the Ada expression evaluator. In particular, a string literal may be converted to a wide or wide-wide string depending on context. The patch updates an existing test case. Note that another test, namely something like: ptype Wide_Wide_String'("literal") ... would be nice to add, but when tested against a distro GNAT, this did not work (probably due to lack of debuginfo); so, I haven't included it here.
2022-03-16Remove eval_op_stringTom Tromey2-15/+11
eval_op_string is only used in a single place -- the implementation of string_operation. This patch turns it into the string_operation::evaluate method, removing a bit of extraneous code.
2022-03-16Powerpc fix for gdb.base/ending-run.expCarl Love1-0/+16
The last two tests in gdb.base/ending-run.exp case fail on Powerpc when the system does not have the needed glibc debug-info files loaded. In this case, gdb is not able to determine where execution stopped. This behavior looks as follows for the test case: The next to the last test does a next command when the program is stopped at the closing bracket for main. The message printed is: 0x00007ffff7d01524 in ?? () from /lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 which fails to match any of the test_multiple options. The test then does another next command. On Powerpc, the message printed it: Cannot find bounds of current function The test fails as the output does not match any of the options for the gdb_test_multiple. I checked the behavior on Powerpc to see if this is typical. I ran gdb on the following simple program as shown below. #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { printf("Hello, world!\n"); return 0; } gdb ./hello_world <snip the gdb start info> Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"... Reading symbols from ./hello_world... (No debugging symbols found in ./hello_world) (gdb) break main Breakpoint 1 at 0x818 (gdb) r Starting program: /home/carll/hello_world [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Breakpoint 1, 0x0000000100000818 in main () (gdb) n Single stepping until exit from function main, which has no line number information. Hello, world! 0x00007ffff7d01524 in ?? () from /lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (gdb) n Cannot find bounds of current function So it would seem that the messages seen from the test case are "normal" output for Powerpc when the debug-info is not available. The following patch adds the output from Powerpc as an option to the gdb_test_multiple statement, identifying the output as the expected output on Powerpc without the needed debug-info files installed. The patch has been tested on a Power 10 system and an Intel 64-bit system. No additional regression failures were seen on either platform.
2022-03-16gdb/mi: consistently notify user when GDB/MI client uses -thread-selectJan Vrany8-69/+106
GDB notifies users about user selected thread changes somewhat inconsistently as mentioned on gdb-patches mailing list here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-February/185989.html Consider GDB debugging a multi-threaded inferior with both CLI and GDB/MI interfaces connected to separate terminals. Assuming inferior is stopped and thread 1 is selected, when a thread 2 is selected using '-thread-select 2' command on GDB/MI terminal: -thread-select 2 ^done,new-thread-id="2",frame={level="0",addr="0x00005555555551cd",func="child_sub_function",args=[],file="/home/jv/Projects/gdb/users_jv_patches/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/user-selected-context-sync.c",fullname="/home/uuu/gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/user-selected-context-sync.c",line="30",arch="i386:x86-64"} (gdb) and on CLI terminal we get the notification (as expected): [Switching to thread 2 (Thread 0x7ffff7daa640 (LWP 389659))] #0 child_sub_function () at /home/uuu/gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/user-selected-context-sync.c:30 30 volatile int dummy = 0; However, now that thread 2 is selected, if thread 1 is selected using 'thread-select --thread 1 1' command on GDB/MI terminal terminal: -thread-select --thread 1 1 ^done,new-thread-id="1",frame={level="0",addr="0x0000555555555294",func="main",args=[],file="/home/jv/Projects/gdb/users_jv_patches/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/user-selected-context-sync.c",fullname="/home/jv/Projects/gdb/users_jv_patches/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/user-selected-context-sync.c",line="66",arch="i386:x86-64"} (gdb) but no notification is printed on CLI terminal, despite the fact that user selected thread has changed. The problem is that when `-thread-select --thread 1 1` is executed then thread is switched to thread 1 before mi_cmd_thread_select () is called, therefore the condition "inferior_ptid != previous_ptid" there does not hold. To address this problem, we have to move notification logic up to mi_cmd_execute () where --thread option is processed and notify user selected contents observers there if context changes. However, this in itself breaks GDB/MI because it would cause context notification to be sent on MI channel. This is because by the time we notify, MI notification suppression is already restored (done in mi_command::invoke(). Therefore we had to lift notification suppression logic also up to mi_cmd_execute (). This change in made distinction between mi_command::invoke() and mi_command::do_invoke() unnecessary as all mi_command::invoke() did (after the change) was to call do_invoke(). So this patches removes do_invoke() and moves the command execution logic directly to invoke(). With this change, all gdb.mi tests pass, tested on x86_64-linux. Co-authored-by: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20631
2022-03-16Make gdb.fortran/{array-slices,lbound-ubound} work against gdbserverPedro Alves3-15/+45
gdb.fortran/array-slices.exp and gdb.fortran/lbound-ubound.exp were recently disabled unless testing with the native target, because they rely on inferior I/O. However, when testing against gdbserver using the native-gdbserver/native-extended-gdbserver boards, we do have access to inferior I/O. The right way to check whether the board can do I/O, is via checking the gdb,noinferiorio board variable. Switch to using that. And then, tweak the testcases to expect output to appear in inferior_spawn_id, instead of gdb_spawn_id. When testing against the native target, inferior_spawn_id is the same as gdb_spawn_id. When testing against gdbserver, it maps to gdbserver_spawn_id. This exposed a buglet in gdb.fortran/array-slices.f90's show_1d subroutine -- it was missing printing newline at the end of the "Expected GDB Output" text, leading to a test timeout. All other subroutines end with advance=yes, except this one. Fix it by using advance=yes here too. Change-Id: I4640729f334431cfc24b0917e7d3977b677c6ca5