| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This changes GDB to use frame_info_ptr instead of frame_info *
The substitution was done with multiple sequential `sed` commands:
sed 's/^struct frame_info;/class frame_info_ptr;/'
sed 's/struct frame_info \*/frame_info_ptr /g' - which left some
issues in a few files, that were manually fixed.
sed 's/\<frame_info \*/frame_info_ptr /g'
sed 's/frame_info_ptr $/frame_info_ptr/g' - used to remove whitespace
problems.
The changed files were then manually checked and some 'sed' changes
undone, some constructors and some gets were added, according to what
made sense, and what Tromey originally did
Co-Authored-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
Approved-by: Tom Tomey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
Building on the previous commits, this commit goes through the various
gdbarch_register_name methods and removes all the remaining 'return
NULL' cases, I claim that these either couldn't be hit, or should be
returning the empty string.
In all cases the return of NULL was used if the register number being
passed to gdbarch_register_name was "invalid", i.e. negative, or
greater than the total number of declared registers. I don't believe
either of these cases can occur, and the previous commit asserts that
this is the case. As a result we can simplify the code by removing
these checks. In many cases, where the register names are held in an
array, I was able to add a static assert that the array contains the
correct number of strings, after that, a direct access into the array
is fine.
I don't have any means of testing these changes.
|
|
Remove the macro, replace all uses with calls to type::length.
Change-Id: Ib9bdc954576860b21190886534c99103d6a47afb
|
|
This removes the deprecated register_gdbarch_init in favor a default
argument to gdbarch_register. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 34.
|
|
After the commit:
commit 08106042d9f5fdff60c129bf33190639f1a98b2a
Date: Thu May 19 13:20:17 2022 +0100
gdb: move the type cast into gdbarch_tdep
GDB would no longer build using g++ 4.8. The issue appears to be some
confusion caused by GDB having 'struct gdbarch_tdep', but also a
templated function called 'gdbarch_tdep'. Prior to the above commit
the gdbarch_tdep function was not templated, and this compiled just
fine. Note that the above commit compiles just fine with later
versions of g++, so this issue was clearly fixed at some point, though
I've not tried to track down exactly when.
In this commit I propose to fix the g++ 4.8 build problem by renaming
'struct gdbarch_tdep' to 'struct gdbarch_tdep_base'. This rename
better represents that the struct is only ever used as a base class,
and removes the overloading of the name, which allows GDB to build
with g++ 4.8.
I've also updated the comment on 'struct gdbarch_tdep_base' to fix a
typo, and the comment on the 'gdbarch_tdep' function, to mention that
in maintainer mode a run-time type check is performed.
|
|
I built GDB for all targets on a x86-64/GNU-Linux system, and
then (accidentally) passed GDB a RISC-V binary, and asked GDB to "run"
the binary on the native target. I got this error:
(gdb) show architecture
The target architecture is set to "auto" (currently "i386").
(gdb) file /tmp/hello.rv32.exe
Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.rv32.exe...
(gdb) show architecture
The target architecture is set to "auto" (currently "riscv:rv32").
(gdb) run
Starting program: /tmp/hello.rv32.exe
../../src/gdb/i387-tdep.c:596: internal-error: i387_supply_fxsave: Assertion `tdep->st0_regnum >= I386_ST0_REGNUM' failed.
What's going on here is this; initially the architecture is i386, this
is based on the default architecture, which is set based on the native
target. After loading the RISC-V executable the architecture of the
current inferior is updated based on the architecture of the
executable.
When we "run", GDB does a fork & exec, with the inferior being
controlled through ptrace. GDB sees an initial stop from the inferior
as soon as the inferior comes to life. In response to this stop GDB
ends up calling save_stop_reason (linux-nat.c), which ends up trying
to read register from the inferior, to do this we end up calling
target_ops::fetch_registers, which, for the x86-64 native target,
calls amd64_linux_nat_target::fetch_registers.
After this I eventually end up in i387_supply_fxsave, different x86
based targets will end in different functions to fetch registers, but
it doesn't really matter which function we end up in, the problem is
this line, which is repeated in many places:
i386_gdbarch_tdep *tdep = (i386_gdbarch_tdep *) gdbarch_tdep (arch);
The problem here is that the ARCH in this line comes from the current
inferior, which, as we discussed above, will be a RISC-V gdbarch, the
tdep field will actually be of type riscv_gdbarch_tdep, not
i386_gdbarch_tdep. After this cast we are relying on undefined
behaviour, in my case I happen to trigger an assert, but this might
not always be the case.
The thing I tried that exposed this problem was of course, trying to
start an executable of the wrong architecture on a native target. I
don't think that the correct solution for this problem is to detect,
at the point of cast, that the gdbarch_tdep object is of the wrong
type, but, I did wonder, is there a way that we could protect
ourselves from incorrectly casting the gdbarch_tdep object?
I think that there is something we can do here, and this commit is the
first step in that direction, though no actual check is added by this
commit.
This commit can be split into two parts:
(1) In gdbarch.h and arch-utils.c. In these files I have modified
gdbarch_tdep (the function) so that it now takes a template argument,
like this:
template<typename TDepType>
static inline TDepType *
gdbarch_tdep (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
{
struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep_1 (gdbarch);
return static_cast<TDepType *> (tdep);
}
After this change we are no better protected, but the cast is now
done within the gdbarch_tdep function rather than at the call sites,
this leads to the second, much larger change in this commit,
(2) Everywhere gdbarch_tdep is called, we make changes like this:
- i386_gdbarch_tdep *tdep = (i386_gdbarch_tdep *) gdbarch_tdep (arch);
+ i386_gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep<i386_gdbarch_tdep> (arch);
There should be no functional change after this commit.
In the next commit I will build on this change to add an assertion in
gdbarch_tdep that checks we are casting to the correct type.
|
|
"struct insn_info" is defined in multiple .c files, causing ODR
warnings. This patch renames the type in z80-tdep.c, leaving the
other one alone.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395
|
|
Some overlay-related constants are duplicated in z80-tdep.c, causing
ODR warnings. This patch renames just the z80-specific ones.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395
|
|
"struct instruction_type" is defined in multiple .c files, causing an
ODR warning. This patch renames the types.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395
|
|
Remove all macros related to getting and setting some symbol value:
#define SYMBOL_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.ivalue
#define SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol) \
#define SET_SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol, new_value) \
#define SYMBOL_VALUE_BYTES(symbol) (symbol)->value.bytes
#define SYMBOL_VALUE_COMMON_BLOCK(symbol) (symbol)->value.common_block
#define SYMBOL_BLOCK_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.block
#define SYMBOL_VALUE_CHAIN(symbol) (symbol)->value.chain
#define MSYMBOL_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.ivalue
#define MSYMBOL_VALUE_RAW_ADDRESS(symbol) ((symbol)->value.address + 0)
#define MSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(objfile, symbol) \
#define BMSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol) \
#define SET_MSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol, new_value) \
#define MSYMBOL_VALUE_BYTES(symbol) (symbol)->value.bytes
#define MSYMBOL_BLOCK_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.block
Replace them with equivalent methods on the appropriate objects.
Change-Id: Iafdab3b8eefc6dc2fd895aa955bf64fafc59ed50
|
|
Add a getter and a setter for a symtab's compunit_symtab. Remove the
corresponding macro and adjust all callers.
For brevity, I chose the name "compunit" instead of "compunit_symtab"
the the field, getter and setter names. Since we are already in symtab
context, the _symtab suffix seems redundant.
Change-Id: I4b9b731c96e3594f7733e75af1e3d01bc0e4fe92
|
|
Add a getter and a setter for a compunit_symtab's debugformat. Remove
the corresponding macro and adjust all callers.
Change-Id: I1667b02d5322346f8e23abd9f8a584afbcd75975
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
Commit 345bd07cce33 ("gdb: fix gdbarch_tdep ODR violation") made a bunch
of files define a *_gdbarch_tdep class that inherits from a gdbarch_tdep
base. But some of these files don't include gdbarch.h, where
gdbarch_tdep is defined. This may cause build errors if gdbarch.h isn't
already included by chance by some other header file. Avoid this by
making them include gdbarch.h.
Change-Id: If433d302007e274daa4f656cfc94f769cf1aa68a
|
|
I would like to be able to use non-trivial types in gdbarch_tdep types.
This is not possible at the moment (in theory), because of the one
definition rule.
To allow it, rename all gdbarch_tdep types to <arch>_gdbarch_tdep, and
make them inherit from a gdbarch_tdep base class. The inheritance is
necessary to be able to pass pointers to all these <arch>_gdbarch_tdep
objects to gdbarch_alloc, which takes a pointer to gdbarch_tdep.
These objects are never deleted through a base class pointer, so I
didn't include a virtual destructor. In the future, if gdbarch objects
deletable, I could imagine that the gdbarch_tdep objects could become
owned by the gdbarch objects, and then it would become useful to have a
virtual destructor (so that the gdbarch object can delete the owned
gdbarch_tdep object). But that's not necessary right now.
It turns out that RISC-V already has a gdbarch_tdep that is
non-default-constructible, so that provides a good motivation for this
change.
Most changes are fairly straightforward, mostly needing to add some
casts all over the place. There is however the xtensa architecture,
doing its own little weird thing to define its gdbarch_tdep. I did my
best to adapt it, but I can't test those changes.
Change-Id: Ic001903f91ddd106bd6ca09a79dabe8df2d69f3b
|
|
Supported ISAs:
- Z80 (all undocumented instructions)
- Z180
- eZ80 (Z80 mode only)
Datasheets:
Z80: https://www.zilog.com/manage_directlink.php?filepath=docs/z80/um0080&extn=.pdf
Z180: https://www.zilog.com/manage_directlink.php?filepath=docs/z180/ps0140&extn=.pdf
eZ80: http://www.zilog.com/force_download.php?filepath=YUhSMGNEb3ZMM2QzZHk1NmFXeHZaeTVqYjIwdlpHOWpjeTlWVFRBd056Y3VjR1Jt
To debug Z80 programs using GDB you must configure and embed
z80-stub.c to your program (SDCC compiler is required). Or
you may use some simulator with GDB support.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in (ALL_TARGET_OBS): Add z80-tdep.c.
* NEWS: Mention z80 support.
* configure.tgt: Handle z80*.
* features/Makefile (XMLTOC): Add z80.xml.
* features/z80-cpu.xml: New.
* features/z80.c: Generate.
* features/z80.xml: New.
* z80-tdep.c: New file.
* z80-tdep.h: New file.
gdb/stubs/ChangeLog:
* z80-stub.c: New file.
Change-Id: Id0b7a6e210c3f93c6853c5e3031b7bcee47d0db9
|
