aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/value.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-02-27Change finalize_values into a final cleanupTom Tromey1-4/+0
This removes finalize_values in favor of adding a new final cleanup. This is safe now that extension languages are explicitly shut down.
2024-02-20gdb: pass frames as `const frame_info_ptr &`Simon Marchi1-17/+18
We currently pass frames to function by value, as `frame_info_ptr`. This is somewhat expensive: - the size of `frame_info_ptr` is 64 bytes, which is a bit big to pass by value - the constructors and destructor link/unlink the object in the global `frame_info_ptr::frame_list` list. This is an `intrusive_list`, so it's not so bad: it's just assigning a few points, there's no memory allocation as if it was `std::list`, but still it's useless to do that over and over. As suggested by Tom Tromey, change many function signatures to accept `const frame_info_ptr &` instead of `frame_info_ptr`. Some functions reassign their `frame_info_ptr` parameter, like: void the_func (frame_info_ptr frame) { for (; frame != nullptr; frame = get_prev_frame (frame)) { ... } } I wondered what to do about them, do I leave them as-is or change them (and need to introduce a separate local variable that can be re-assigned). I opted for the later for consistency. It might not be clear why some functions take `const frame_info_ptr &` while others take `frame_info_ptr`. Also, if a function took a `frame_info_ptr` because it did re-assign its parameter, I doubt that we would think to change it to `const frame_info_ptr &` should the implementation change such that it doesn't need to take `frame_info_ptr` anymore. It seems better to have a simple rule and apply it everywhere. Change-Id: I59d10addef687d157f82ccf4d54f5dde9a963fd0 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-01-12Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
This commit is the result of the following actions: - Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to include 2024, - Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the file, - Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright date, - Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've updated them this year to 2024. I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as you spot them.
2023-12-24gdb: make value::allocate_register_lazy store id of next non-inline frameSimon Marchi1-4/+4
Some spots loop on the frame chain to find the first next non-inline frame, and pass that as the "next frame" to value::allocate_register_lazy / value::allocate_register. This is necessary if the value is used in the process of computing the id of "this frame". If the frame next to "this frame" is inlined into "this frame", then you that next frame won't have a computed id yet. You have to go past that to find the next non-inline frame, which will have a computed id. In other cases, it's fine to store the id of an inline frame as the "next frame id" in a register struct value. When trying to unwind a register from it, it will just call inline_frame_prev_register, which will forward the request to the next next frame, until we hit the next physical frame. I think it would make things simpler to just never store the id of an inline frame as the next frame id of register struct values, and go with the first next non-inline frame directly. This way, we don't have to wonder which code paths have to skip inline frames when creating register values and which don't. So, change value::allocate_register_lazy to do that work, and remove the loops for the callers that did it. Change-Id: Ic88115dac49dc14e3053c95f92050062b24b7310
2023-12-24gdb: remove VALUE_REGNUM, add value::regnumSimon Marchi1-4/+10
Remove VALUE_REGNUM, replace it with a method on struct value. Set `m_location.reg.regnum` directly from value::allocate_register_lazy, which is fine because allocate_register_lazy is a static creation function for struct value. Change-Id: Id632502357da971617d9dce1e2eab9b56dbcf52d
2023-12-24gdb: remove VALUE_NEXT_FRAME_ID, add value::next_frame_idSimon Marchi1-7/+9
Remove VALUE_NEXT_FRAME_ID, replace it with a method on struct value. Set `m_location.reg.next_frame_id` directly from value::allocate_register_lazy, which is fine because allocate_register_lazy is a static creation function for struct value. Change-Id: Ic9f0f239c166a88dccfee836f9f51871e67548e6
2023-12-24gdb: remove read_frame_register_value's frame parameterSimon Marchi1-3/+0
By now, all register struct values should have a valid next frame id (assuming they are created using value::allocate_register or value::allocate_register_lazy), so there should be no need to pass a frame alongside the value to read_frame_register_value. Remove the frame parameter and adjust read_frame_register_value accordingly. While at it, make read_frame_register_value static, it's only used in findvar.c. Change-Id: I118959ef8c628499297c67810916e8ba9934bfac
2023-12-24gdb: add type parameter to value::allocate_register and add ↵Simon Marchi1-4/+9
value::allocate_register_lazy Some places that create register struct values don't use register_type to obtain the value type. This prevents them from using the current version of value::allocate_register. One spot (value_of_register_lazy) also creates a lazy register value. Add a value::allocate_register_lazy method. Add some type parameters to value::allocate_register and value::allocate_register_lazy, to let the caller specify the type to use for the value. The parameters default to nullptr, in which case we use register_type to obtain the type. Change-Id: I640ec0a5a0f4a55eba12d515dbfd25933229f8ec
2023-12-24gdb: pass frame_info_ptr to gdbarch_value_from_registerSimon Marchi1-4/+3
Pass a frame_info_ptr rather than a frame_id. This avoids having to do a frame lookup on the callee side, when we can just pass the frame down directly. I think this fixes a bug in rs6000-tdep.c where the id of the wrong frame was set to `VALUE_NEXT_FRAME_ID (v)`. Change-Id: I77039bc87ea8fc5262f16d0e1446515efa21c565
2023-12-14gdb: add gdbarch_pseudo_register_write that takes a frameSimon Marchi1-0/+22
Add a new variant of gdbarch_pseudo_register_write that takes a frame_info in order to write raw registers. Use this new method when available: - in put_frame_register, when trying to write a pseudo register to a given frame - in regcache::cooked_write No implementation is migrated to use this new method (that will come in subsequent patches), so no behavior change is expected here. The objective is to fix writing pseudo registers to non-current frames. See previous commit "gdb: read pseudo register through frame" for a more detailed explanation. Change-Id: Ie7fe364a15a4d86c2ecb09de2b4baa08c45555ac Reviewed-By: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
2023-12-14gdb: read pseudo register through frameSimon Marchi1-0/+26
Change gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value to take a frame instead of a regcache. The frame (and formerly the regcache) is used to read raw registers needed to make up the pseudo register value. The problem with using the regcache is that it always provides raw register values for the current frame (frame 0). Let's say the user wants to read the ebx register on amd64. ebx is a pseudo register, obtained by reading the bottom half (bottom 4 bytes) of the rbx register, which is a raw register. If the currently selected frame is frame 0, it works fine: (gdb) frame 0 #0 break_here_asm () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S:36 36 in /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S (gdb) p/x $ebx $1 = 0x24252627 (gdb) p/x $rbx $2 = 0x2021222324252627 But if the user is looking at another frame, and the raw register behind the pseudo register has been saved at some point in the call stack, then we get a wrong answer: (gdb) frame 1 #1 0x000055555555517d in caller () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S:56 56 in /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S (gdb) p/x $ebx $3 = 0x24252627 (gdb) p/x $rbx $4 = 0x1011121314151617 Here, the value of ebx was computed using the value of rbx in frame 0 (through the regcache), it should have been computed using the value of rbx in frame 1. In other to make this work properly, make the following changes: - Make dwarf2_frame_prev_register return nullptr if it doesn't know how to unwind a register and that register is a pseudo register. Previously, it returned `frame_unwind_got_register`, meaning, in our example, "the value of ebx in frame 1 is the same as the value of ebx in frame 0", which is obviously false. Return nullptr as a way to say "I don't know". - In frame_unwind_register_value, when prev_register (for instance dwarf2_frame_prev_register) returns nullptr, and we are trying to read a pseudo register, try to get the register value through gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value or gdbarch_pseudo_register_read. If using gdbarch_pseudo_register_read, the behavior is known to be broken. Implementations should be migrated to use gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value to fix that. - Change gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value to take a frame_info instead of a regcache, update implementations (aarch64, amd64, i386). In i386-tdep.c, I made a copy of i386_mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum that uses a frame instead of a regcache. The version using the regcache is still used by i386_pseudo_register_write. It will get removed in a subsequent patch. - Add some helpers in value.{c,h} to implement the common cases of pseudo registers: taking part of a raw register and concatenating multiple raw registers. - Update readable_regcache::{cooked_read,cooked_read_value} to pass the current frame to gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value. Passing the current frame will give the same behavior as before: for frame 0, raw registers will be read from the current thread's regcache. Notes: - I do not plan on changing gdbarch_pseudo_register_read to receive a frame instead of a regcache. That method is considered deprecated. Instead, we should be working on migrating implementations to use gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value instead. - In frame_unwind_register_value, we still ask the unwinder to try to unwind pseudo register values. It's apparently possible for the debug info to provide information about [1] pseudo registers, so we want to try that first, before falling back to computing them ourselves. [1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20180528174715.A954AD804AD@oc3748833570.ibm.com/ Change-Id: Id6ef1c64e19090a183dec050e4034d8c2394e7ca Reviewed-by: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
2023-12-14gdb: add value::allocate_registerSimon Marchi1-0/+7
Add value::allocate_register, to facilitate allocating a value representing a register in a given frame (or rather, in the given frame's previous frame). It will be used in a subsequent patch. I changed one relatively obvious spot that could use it, to at least exercise the code path. Change-Id: Icd4960f5e471a74b657bb3596c88d89679ef3772 Reviewed-By: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
2023-12-14gdb: change value_of_register and value_of_register_lazy to take the next frameSimon Marchi1-2/+7
Some functions related to the handling of registers in frames accept "this frame", for which we want to read or write the register values, while other functions accept "the next frame", which is the frame next to that. The later is needed because we sometimes need to read register values for a frame that does not exist yet (usually when trying to unwind that frame-to-be). value_of_register and value_of_register_lazy both take "this frame", even if what they ultimately want internally is "the next frame". This is annoying if you are in a spot that currently has "the next frame" and need to call one of these functions (which happens later in this series). You need to get the previous frame only for those functions to get the next frame again. This is more manipulations, more chances of mistake. I propose to change these functions (and a few more functions in the subsequent patches) to operate on "the next frame". Things become a bit less awkward when all these functions agree on which frame they take. So, in this patch, change value_of_register_lazy and value_of_register to take "the next frame" instead of "this frame". This adds a lot of get_next_frame_sentinel_okay, but if we convert the user registers API to also use "the next frame" instead of "this frame", it will get simple again. Change-Id: Iaa24815e648fbe5ae3c214c738758890a91819cd Reviewed-By: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
2023-11-21gdb: Replace gdb::optional with std::optionalLancelot Six1-2/+2
Since GDB now requires C++17, we don't need the internally maintained gdb::optional implementation. This patch does the following replacing: - gdb::optional -> std::optional - gdb::in_place -> std::in_place - #include "gdbsupport/gdb_optional.h" -> #include <optional> This change has mostly been done automatically. One exception is gdbsupport/thread-pool.* which did not use the gdb:: prefix as it already lives in the gdb namespace. Change-Id: I19a92fa03e89637bab136c72e34fd351524f65e9 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
2023-09-20Remove explanatory comments from includesTom Tromey1-1/+1
I noticed a comment by an include and remembered that I think these don't really provide much value -- sometimes they are just editorial, and sometimes they are obsolete. I think it's better to just remove them. Tested by rebuilding. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-09-05Introduce type::is_array_like and value_to_arrayTom Tromey1-0/+4
This adds the type::is_array_like method and the value_to_array function. The former can be used to see whether a given type is known to be "array-like". This is the currently the case for certain compiler-generated structure types; in particular both the Ada and Rust compilers do this.
2023-08-29Remove "highbound" parameter from value_arrayTom Tromey1-1/+1
value_array requires the passed-in bounds to match the length of the array_view it is given. This patch removes the redundant "highbound" parameter. Reviewed-by: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-08-29Use gdb::array_view for value_arrayTom Tromey1-1/+1
This changes value_array to accept an array view. I also replaced an alloca with a std::vector in array_operation::evaluate. This function can work on any size of array, so it seems bad to use alloca. Reviewed-by: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-07-07gdb: check max-value-size when reading strings for printfAndrew Burgess1-0/+5
I noticed that the printf code for strings, printf_c_string and printf_wide_c_string, don't take max-value-size into account, but do load a complete string from the inferior into a GDB buffer. As such it would be possible for an badly behaved inferior to cause GDB to try and allocate an excessively large buffer, potentially crashing GDB, or at least causing GDB to swap lots, which isn't great. We already have a setting to protect against this sort of thing, the 'max-value-size'. So this commit updates the two function mentioned above to check the max-value-size and give an error if the max-value-size is exceeded. If the max-value-size is exceeded, I chose to continue reading inferior memory to figure out how long the string actually is, we just don't store the results. The benefit of this is that when we give the user an error we can tell the user how big the string actually is, which would allow them to correctly adjust max-value-size, if that's what they choose to do. The default for max-value-size is 64k so there should be no user visible changes after this commit, unless the user was previously printing very large strings. If that is the case then the user will now need to increase max-value-size.
2023-06-05gdb: building inferior strings from within GDBAndrew Burgess1-2/+39
History Of This Patch ===================== This commit aims to address PR gdb/21699. There have now been a couple of attempts to fix this issue. Simon originally posted two patches back in 2021: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-July/180894.html https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-July/180896.html Before Pedro then posted a version of his own: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-July/180970.html After this the conversation halted. Then in 2023 I (Andrew) also took a look at this bug and posted two versions: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-April/198570.html https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-April/198680.html The approach taken in my first patch was pretty similar to what Simon originally posted back in 2021. My second attempt was only a slight variation on the first. Pedro then pointed out his older patch, and so we arrive at this patch. The GDB changes here are mostly Pedro's work, but updated by me (Andrew), any mistakes are mine. The tests here are a combinations of everyone's work, and the commit message is new, but copies bits from everyone's earlier work. Problem Description =================== Bug PR gdb/21699 makes the observation that using $_as_string with GDB's printf can cause GDB to print unexpected data from the inferior. The reproducer is pretty simple: #include <stddef.h> static char arena[100]; /* Override malloc() so value_coerce_to_target() gets a known pointer, and we know we"ll see an error if $_as_string() gives a string that isn't null terminated. */ void *malloc (size_t size) { memset (arena, 'x', sizeof (arena)); if (size > sizeof (arena)) return NULL; return arena; } int main () { return 0; } And then in a GDB session: $ gdb -q test Reading symbols from /tmp/test... (gdb) start Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x4004c8: file test.c, line 17. Starting program: /tmp/test Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at test.c:17 17 return 0; (gdb) printf "%s\n", $_as_string("hello") "hello"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (gdb) quit The problem above is caused by how value_cstring is used within py-value.c, but once we understand the issue then it turns out that value_cstring is used in an unexpected way in many places within GDB. Within py-value.c we have a null-terminated C-style string. We then pass a pointer to this string, along with the length of this string (so not including the null-character) to value_cstring. In value_cstring GDB allocates an array value of the given character type, and copies in requested number of characters. However value_cstring does not add a null-character of its own. This means that the value created by calling value_cstring is only null-terminated if the null-character is included in the passed in length. In py-value.c this is not the case, and indeed, in most uses of value_cstring, this is not the case. When GDB tries to print one of these strings the value contents are pushed to the inferior, and then read back as a C-style string, that is, GDB reads inferior memory until it finds a null-terminator. For the py-value.c case, no null-terminator is pushed into the inferior, so GDB will continue reading inferior memory until a null-terminator is found, with unpredictable results. Patch Description ================= The first thing this patch does is better define what the arguments for the two function value_cstring and value_string should represent. The comments in the header file are updated to describe whether the length argument should, or should not, include a null-character. Also, the data argument is changed to type gdb_byte. The functions as they currently exist will handle wide-characters, in which case more than one 'char' would be needed for each character. As such using gdb_byte seems to make more sense. To avoid adding casts throughout GDB, I've also added an overload that still takes a 'char *', but asserts that the character type being used is of size '1'. The value_cstring function is now responsible for adding a null character at the end of the string value it creates. However, once we start looking at how value_cstring is used, we realise there's another, related, problem. Not every language's strings are null terminated. Fortran and Ada strings, for example, are just an array of characters, GDB already has the function value_string which can be used to create such values. Consider this example using current GDB: (gdb) set language ada (gdb) p $_gdb_setting("arch") $1 = (97, 117, 116, 111) (gdb) ptype $ type = array (1 .. 4) of char (gdb) p $_gdb_maint_setting("test-settings string") $2 = (0) (gdb) ptype $ type = array (1 .. 1) of char This shows two problems, first, the $_gdb_setting and $_gdb_maint_setting functions are calling value_cstring using the builtin_char character, rather than a language appropriate type. In the first call, the 'arch' case, the value_cstring call doesn't include the null character, so the returned array only contains the expected characters. But, in the $_gdb_maint_setting example we do end up including the null-character, even though this is not expected for Ada strings. This commit adds a new language method language_defn::value_string, this function takes a pointer and length and creates a language appropriate value that represents the string. For C, C++, etc this will be a null-terminated string (by calling value_cstring), and for Fortran and Ada this can be a bounded array of characters with no null terminator. Additionally, this new language_defn::value_string function is responsible for selecting a language appropriate character type. After this commit the only calls to value_cstring are from the C expression evaluator and from the default language_defn::value_string. And the only calls to value_string are from Fortan, Ada, and ObjectC related code. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21699 Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Co-Authored-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-05-25Fix scoped_value_mark not working with empty value chainCiaran Woodward1-2/+3
The scoped_value_mark helper class was setting its internal mark value to NULL to indicate that the value chain had already been freed to mark. However, value_mark() also returns NULL if the value chain is empty at the time of call. This lead to the situation that if the value chain was empty at the time the scoped_value_mark was created, the class would not correctly clean up the state when it was destroyed, because it believed it had already been freed. I noticed this because I was setting a watchpoint very early in my debug session, and it was becoming a software watchpoint rather than hardware. Running any command that called evaluate() beforehand (such as 'x 0') would mean that a hardware watchpoint was correctly used. After some careful examination of the differences in execution, I noticed that values were being freed later in the 'bad case', which lead me to notice the issue with scoped_value_mark.
2023-05-23Add flags to parse_and_evalTom Tromey1-1/+1
This adds a flags parameter to parse_and_eval.
2023-05-01Remove evaluate_typeTom Tromey1-2/+0
Like evaluate_expression, evaluate_type is also just a simple wrapper. Removing it makes the code a little nicer.
2023-05-01Remove evaluate_expressionTom Tromey1-9/+0
evaluate_expression is just a little wrapper for a method on expression. Removing it also removes a lot of ugly (IMO) calls to get().
2023-03-29Pass a frame to value_at_lazy and value_from_contents_and_addressTom Tromey1-4/+10
This patch adds a 'frame' parameter to value_at_lazy and ensures that it is passed down to the call to resolve_dynamic_type. This required also adding a frame parameter to value_from_contents_and_address. Nothing passes this parameter to value_at_lazy yet, so this patch should have no visible effect.
2023-03-27Add value_as_mpz and value_from_mpzTom Tromey1-0/+7
This adds the two new functions, value_as_mpz and value_from_mpz, useful for manipulation values via gdb_mpz.
2023-03-02Fix some value commentsTom Tromey1-0/+5
I noticed a very stale comment in valarith.c. This patch fixes a few comments in this area. Reviewed-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-02-28Remove value_inTom Tromey1-2/+0
value_in is unused. From git log, it seems to have been part of the Chill language, which was removed from gdb eons ago. This patch removes the function. Tested by rebuilding.
2023-02-15Return bool from more value methodsTom Tromey1-11/+11
There are several more value methods that currently return 'int' but that should return 'bool'. This patch updates these. Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-02-15Have value::bits_synthetic_pointer return boolTom Tromey1-3/+3
This changes value::bits_synthetic_pointer to return bool and fixes up some fallout from this. Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-02-15Change value::m_stack to boolTom Tromey1-5/+5
This changes value::m_stack to be a bool and updates the various uses. Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-02-15Change value::m_initialized to boolTom Tromey1-5/+5
This changes value::m_initialized to be a bool and updates the various uses. Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-02-15Change value::m_lazy to boolTom Tromey1-8/+8
This changes value::m_lazy to be a bool and updates the various uses. Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-02-15Change value::m_modifiable to boolTom Tromey1-4/+4
This changes value::m_modifiable to be a bool and updates the various uses. Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-02-13Remove deprecated_lval_hackTom Tromey1-10/+0
This removes deprecated_lval_hack and the VALUE_LVAL macro, replacing all uses with a call to value::lval. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Introduce set_lval method on valueTom Tromey1-0/+4
This introduces the set_lval method on value, one step toward removing deprecated_lval_hack. Ultimately I think the goal should be for some of these set_* methods to be replaced with constructors; but I haven't done this, as the series is already too long. Other 'deprecated' methods can probably be handled the same way. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Make ~value privateTom Tromey1-4/+6
At the end of this series, I belatedly realized that values should only be destroyed by value_decref. This patch marks the the destructor private to enforce this. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Make struct value data members privateTom Tromey1-6/+2
This hoists the 'private' in struct value to also encompass the data members. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn record_latest_value into a methodTom Tromey1-2/+3
record_latest_value now access some internals of struct value, so turn it into a method. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Add value::set_modifiableTom Tromey1-0/+4
This introduces a value::set_modifiable and changes a couple of spots to use it. I'm not completely sure the comments by deprecated_modifiable are correct any more. Perhaps they should be removed and the method renamed. Like so many before me, though, I've deferred investigation of the issue. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn various value copying-related functions into methodsTom Tromey1-29/+66
This patch turns a grab bag of value functions to methods of value. These are done together because their implementations are interrelated. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn preserve_one_value into methodTom Tromey1-2/+4
This changes preserve_one_value to be a method of value. Much of this patch was written by script. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn some xmethod functions into methodsTom Tromey1-11/+11
This turns value_from_xmethod, result_type_of_xmethod, and call_xmethod to be methods of value. value_from_xmethod is a static "constructor" now. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn set_value_component_location into methodTom Tromey1-5/+4
This turns set_value_component_location into a method of value. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn value_non_lval and value_force_lval into methodsTom Tromey1-4/+7
This changes value_non_lval and value_force_lval to be methods of value. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn many optimized-out value functions into methodsTom Tromey1-65/+59
This turns many functions that are related to optimized-out or availability-checking to be methods of value. The static function value_entirely_covered_by_range_vector is also converted to be a private method. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn value_copy into a methodTom Tromey1-2/+5
This turns value_copy into a method of value. Much of this was written by script. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn remaining value_contents functions into methodsTom Tromey1-27/+28
This turns the remaining value_contents functions -- value_contents, value_contents_all, value_contents_for_printing, and value_contents_for_printing_const -- into methods of value. It also converts the static functions require_not_optimized_out and require_available to be private methods. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn value_incref and value_decref into methodsTom Tromey1-11/+10
This changes value_incref and value_decref to be methods of value. Much of this patch was written by script. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Move value_ref_policy methods out-of-lineTom Tromey1-9/+14
This moves the value_ref_policy methods to be defined out-of-line. This is a necessary step to change value_incref and value_decref to be methods of value. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>