| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The new_objfile observer is currently used to indicate both when a new
objfile is added to program space (when passed non-nullptr) and when all
objfiles of a program space were just removed (when passed nullptr).
I think this is confusing (and Andrew apparently thinks so too [1]).
Add a new "all_objfiles_removed" observer to remove the second role from
"new_objfile".
Some existing users of new_objfile do nothing if the passed objfile is
nullptr. For them, we can simply drop the nullptr check. For others,
add a new all_objfiles_removed callback, and refactor things a bit to
keep the existing behavior as much as possible.
Some callbacks relied on current_program_space, and following
the refactoring now use either objfile->pspace or the pspace passed to
all_objfiles_removed. I think this should be relatively safe, and in
general a step in the right direction.
On the notify side, I found only one call site to change from
new_objfile to all_objfiles_removed, in clear_symtab_users. It is not
entirely clear to me that this is entirely correct. clear_symtab_users
appears to be called in spots that don't remove all objfiles
(functions finish_new_objfile, remove_symbol_file_command, reread_symbols,
do_module_cleanups). But I think that this patch at least makes the
current code clearer.
[1] https://gitlab.com/gnutools/binutils-gdb/-/commit/a0a031bce0527b1521788b5dad640e7883b3a252
Change-Id: Icb648f72862e056267f30f44dd439bd4ec766f13
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
PR29040 describes a FAIL for test-case gdb.threads/next-fork-other-thread.exp
and target board unix/-m32.
The FAIL happens due to the test executable running into an assert, which is
caused by a forked child segfaulting, like so:
...
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x00000000 in ?? ()
...
I tried to reproduce the segfault with exec next-fork-other-thread-fork, using
TUI layout asm.
I set a breakpoint at fork and ran to the breakpoint, and somewhere during the
following session I ran into a gdb segfault here in
tui_find_disassembly_address:
...
/* Disassemble forward. */
next_addr = tui_disassemble (gdbarch, asm_lines, new_low, max_lines);
last_addr = asm_lines.back ().addr;
...
due to asm_lines being empty after the call to tui_disassemble, while
asm_lines.back () assumes that it's not empty.
I have not been able to reproduce that segfault in that original setting, I'm
not sure of the exact scenario (though looking back it probably involved
"set detach-on-fork off").
What likely happened is that I managed to reproduce PR29040, and TUI (attempted
to) display the disassembly for address 0, which led to the gdb segfault.
When gdb_print_insn encounters an insn it cannot print because it can't read
the memory, it throws a MEMORY_ERROR that is caught by tui_disassemble.
The specific bit that causes the gdb segfault is that if gdb_print_insn throws
a MEMORY_ERROR for the first insn in tui_disassemble, it returns an empty
asm_lines.
FWIW, I did manage to reproduce the gdb segfault as follows:
...
$ gdb -q \
-iex "set pagination off" \
/usr/bin/rustc \
-ex "set breakpoint pending on" \
-ex "b dl_main" \
-ex run \
-ex "up 4" \
-ex "layout asm" \
-ex "print \$pc"
...
<TUI>
...
$1 = (void (*)()) 0x1
(gdb)
...
Now press <up>, and the segfault triggers.
Fix the segfault by handling asm_lines.empty () results of tui_disassemble in
tui_find_disassembly_address.
I've written a unit test that exercises this scenario.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
PR tui/30823
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30823
|
|
I noticed a comment by an include and remembered that I think these
don't really provide much value -- sometimes they are just editorial,
and sometimes they are obsolete. I think it's better to just remove
them. Tested by rebuilding.
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
|
|
Rationale:
I use the mouse with my terminal to select and copy text. In gdb, I use
the mouse to select a function name to set a breakpoint, or a variable
name to print, for example.
When gdb is compiled with ncurses mouse support, gdb's TUI mode
intercepts mouse events. Left-clicking and dragging, which would
normally select text, seems to do nothing. This means I cannot select
text using my mouse anymore. This makes it harder to set breakpoints,
print variables, etc.
Solution:
I tried to fix this issue by editing the 'mousemask' call to only enable
buttons 4 and 5. However, this still caused my terminal (gnome-terminal)
to not allow text to be selected. The only way I could make it work is
by calling 'mousemask (0, NULL);'. But doing so disables the mouse code
entirely, which other people might want.
I therefore decided to make a setting in gdb called 'tui mouse-events'.
If enabled (the default), the behavior is as it is now: terminal mouse
events are given to gdb, disabling the terminal's default behavior.
If disabled (opt-in), the behavior is as it was before the year 2020:
terminal mouse events are not given to gdb, therefore the mouse can be
used to select and copy text.
Notes:
I am not attached to the setting name or its description. Feel free to
suggest better wording.
Testing:
I tested this change in gnome-terminal by performing the following steps
manually:
1. Run: gdb --args ./myprogram
2. Enable TUI: press ctrl-x ctrl-a
3. Click and drag text with the mouse. Observe no selection.
4. Input: set tui mouse-events off
5. Click and drag text with the mouse. Observe that selection works now.
6. Input: set tui mouse-events on.
7. Click and drag text with the mouse. Observe no selection.
|
|
In test-case gdb.tui/long-prompt.exp, with a prompt of 40 chars, the same size
as the terminal width, we get a superfluous newline at line 19:
...
16 (gdb) set prompt 123456789A123456789B123
17 456789C123456789>
18 123456789A123456789B123456789C123456789>
19
20 123456789A123456789B123456789C123456789>
21 set prompt (gdb)
22 (gdb)
...
as well as a superfluous repetition of the prompt at line 20 once we type the
's' starting "set prompt".
I traced the superfluous newline back to readline's readline_internal_setup,
that does:
...
/* If we're not echoing, we still want to at least print a prompt, because
rl_redisplay will not do it for us. If the calling application has a
custom redisplay function, though, let that function handle it. */
if (_rl_echoing_p == 0 && rl_redisplay_function == rl_redisplay)
...
else
{
if (rl_prompt && rl_already_prompted)
rl_on_new_line_with_prompt ();
else
rl_on_new_line ();
(*rl_redisplay_function) ();
...
and then we hit the case that calls rl_on_new_line_with_prompt, which does:
...
/* If the prompt length is a multiple of real_screenwidth, we don't know
whether the cursor is at the end of the last line, or already at the
beginning of the next line. Output a newline just to be safe. */
if (l > 0 && (l % real_screenwidth) == 0)
_rl_output_some_chars ("\n", 1);
...
This doesn't look like a readline bug, because the behaviour matches the
comment.
[ And the fact that the output of the newline doesn't happen in the scope of
tui_redisplay_readline means it doesn't get the prompt wrap detection
treatment, causing start_line to be incorrect, which causes the superfluous
repetition of the prompt. ]
I looked at ways to work around this, and managed by switching off
rl_already_prompted, which we set to 1 in tui_rl_startup_hook:
...
/* Readline hook to redisplay ourself the gdb prompt.
In the SingleKey mode, the prompt is not printed so that
the command window is cleaner. It will be displayed if
we temporarily leave the SingleKey mode. */
static int
tui_rl_startup_hook (void)
{
rl_already_prompted = 1;
if (tui_current_key_mode != TUI_COMMAND_MODE
&& !gdb_in_secondary_prompt_p (current_ui))
tui_set_key_mode (TUI_SINGLE_KEY_MODE);
tui_redisplay_readline ();
return 0;
}
...
Then I started looking at why rl_already_prompted is set to 1.
The use case for rl_already_prompted seems to be:
- app (application, the readline user) outputs prompt,
- app sets rl_already_prompted to 1, and
- app calls readline, which calls rl_on_new_line_with_prompt, which figures
out how long the prompt is, and sets a few readline variables accordingly,
which can be used in the following call to rl_redisplay_function.
AFAICT, TUI does not fit this pattern. It does not output an initial prompt,
rather it writes the prompt in every rl_redisplay_function. It doesn't use
the variables set by rl_on_new_line_with_prompt, instead it figures stuff out
by itself.
Fix this by removing the rl_already_prompted setting.
Also remove the call to tui_redisplay_readline, it's not necessary, the
function is called anyway.
Tested on x86_64-linux, no regressions.
|
|
This commit builds on this earlier work:
commit 9fe01a376b2fb096e4836e985ba316ce9dc02399
Date: Thu Jun 29 11:26:55 2023 -0600
Update TUI window title when changed
and makes tui_win_info::title private, renaming to m_title at the same
time. There's a new tui_win_info::title() member function to provide
read-only access to the title.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
The tui border-kind setting allows values acs, ascii and space.
The values ascii and space however don't work well with !HAVE_WBORDER.
Fix this by removing the !HAVE_WBORDER case, which was introduced for Ultrix
support, which is now obsolete.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
PR tui/30580
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30580
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
The only use of "entry = translate (...)" is entry->value.
Simplify using the function by returning entry->value instead.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
The tables:
- tui_border_kind_translate_ulcorner
- tui_border_kind_translate_urcorner
- tui_border_kind_translate_llcorner
- tui_border_kind_translate_lrcorner
are identical.
Merge and rename to tui_border_kind_translate_corner.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
In function tui_update_variables we have the somewhat inconvenient:
...
entry = translate (tui_border_kind, tui_border_kind_translate_lrcorner);
int val = (entry->value < 0) ? ACS_LRCORNER : entry->value;
...
Add a new function translate_acs, that allows us to do the more straighforward:
...
int val = translate_acs (tui_border_kind, tui_border_kind_translate_lrcorner,
ACS_LRCORNER);
...
By special-casing "acs" in translate_acs, we can now remove the acs entries
from the translation tables.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
The TUI translation tables contain default entries at the end:
...
static struct tui_translate tui_border_kind_translate_hline[] = {
{ "space", ' ' },
{ "ascii", '-' },
{ "acs", -1 },
{ 0, 0 },
{ "ascii", '-' }
};
...
A simpler way of implementing this would be to to declare the first (or last)
entry the default, but in fact these default entries are not used.
Make this explicit by removing the default entries, and asserting in translate
that an entry will always be found.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
I wrote a TUI window in Python, and I noticed that setting its title
did not result in a refresh, so the new title did not appear. This
patch corrects this problem.
|
|
Simplify tui_update_variables by using template function
assign_return_if_changed.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
|
|
Replace macro HELP_ATTRIBUTE_MODE with a std::string.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
Simplify tui_puts_internal by using continue, as per this [1] coding standard
rule, making the function more readable and easier to understand.
No functional changes.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
[1] https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#use-early-exits-and-continue-to-simplify-code
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
Say we're in TUI mode, and type "sun":
...
(gdb) sun
...
After switching to SingleKey mode using C-x s, we have just:
...
sun
...
After typing "d", we get:
...
sun
Undefined command: "sundown". Try "help".
...
The SingleKey "d" is supposed run the "down" command.
Fix this by clearing the readline line buffer when switching to SingleKey
mode.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
PR tui/30522
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30522
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
I noticed that the help texts for tui border-mode and tui active-border-mode
are similar.
Factor out the common part into macro HELP_ATTRIBUTE_MODE.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
|
|
Fix some more typos:
- distinquish -> distinguish
- actualy -> actually
- singe -> single
- frash -> frame
- chid -> child
- dissassembler -> disassembler
- uninitalized -> uninitialized
- precontidion -> precondition
- regsiters -> registers
- marge -> merge
- sate -> state
- garanteed -> guaranteed
- explictly -> explicitly
- prefices (nonstandard plural) -> prefixes
- bondary -> boundary
- formated -> formatted
- ithe -> the
- arrav -> array
- coresponding -> corresponding
- owend -> owned
- fials -> fails
- diasm -> disasm
- ture -> true
- tpye -> type
There's one code change, the name of macro SIG_CODE_BONDARY_FAULT changed to
SIG_CODE_BOUNDARY_FAULT.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
|
|
Fix a few typos:
- implemention -> implementation
- convertion(s) -> conversion(s)
- backlashes -> backslashes
- signoring -> ignoring
- (un)ambigious -> (un)ambiguous
- occured -> occurred
- hidding -> hiding
- temporarilly -> temporarily
- immediatelly -> immediately
- sillyness -> silliness
- similiar -> similar
- porkuser -> pokeuser
- thats -> that
- alway -> always
- supercede -> supersede
- accomodate -> accommodate
- aquire -> acquire
- priveleged -> privileged
- priviliged -> privileged
- priviledges -> privileges
- privilige -> privilege
- recieve -> receive
- (p)refered -> (p)referred
- succesfully -> successfully
- successfuly -> successfully
- responsability -> responsibility
- wether -> whether
- wich -> which
- disasbleable -> disableable
- descriminant -> discriminant
- construcstor -> constructor
- underlaying -> underlying
- underyling -> underlying
- structureal -> structural
- appearences -> appearances
- terciarily -> tertiarily
- resgisters -> registers
- reacheable -> reachable
- likelyhood -> likelihood
- intepreter -> interpreter
- disassemly -> disassembly
- covnersion -> conversion
- conviently -> conveniently
- atttribute -> attribute
- struction -> struct
- resonable -> reasonable
- popupated -> populated
- namespaxe -> namespace
- intialize -> initialize
- identifer(s) -> identifier(s)
- expection -> exception
- exectuted -> executed
- dungerous -> dangerous
- dissapear -> disappear
- completly -> completely
- (inter)changable -> (inter)changeable
- beakpoint -> breakpoint
- automativ -> automatic
- alocating -> allocating
- agressive -> aggressive
- writting -> writing
- reguires -> requires
- registed -> registered
- recuding -> reducing
- opeartor -> operator
- ommitted -> omitted
- modifing -> modifying
- intances -> instances
- imbedded -> embedded
- gdbaarch -> gdbarch
- exection -> execution
- direcive -> directive
- demanged -> demangled
- decidely -> decidedly
- argments -> arguments
- agrument -> argument
- amespace -> namespace
- targtet -> target
- supress(ed) -> suppress(ed)
- startum -> stratum
- squence -> sequence
- prompty -> prompt
- overlow -> overflow
- memember -> member
- languge -> language
- geneate -> generate
- funcion -> function
- exising -> existing
- dinking -> syncing
- destroh -> destroy
- clenaed -> cleaned
- changep -> changedp (name of variable)
- arround -> around
- aproach -> approach
- whould -> would
- symobl -> symbol
- recuse -> recurse
- outter -> outer
- freeds -> frees
- contex -> context
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
I noticed:
...
(gdb) help show tui tab-width
Show the tab witdh, in characters, for the TUI.
This variable controls how many spaces are used to display a tab character.
...
a typo: "witdh".
Fix this by using "width" instead.
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
I added a cmd-only layout:
...
(gdb) tui new-layout cmd cmd 1
...
and set it:
...
(gdb) layout cmd
...
which gave me the expect result: only the cmd window in the screen.
However, after going back to layout src:
...
(gdb) layout src
...
I got a source window with only one line in it, and the cmd window taking most
of the screen.
I traced this back to tui_set_layout, where for both the old and the new
layout the fingerprint of the cmd window in the layout is taken. If the
fingerprint is the same, an effort will be done to preserve the command
window size.
The fingerprint is "VC" for both the old (cmd) and new (src) layouts, which
explains the behaviour.
I think this is essentially a bug in the finger print calculation, and it
should be "C" for the cmd layout.
Fix this by not adding a V or H in the fingerprint if the list size is one.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
Remove the breakpoint_pointer_iterator layer. Adjust all users of
all_breakpoints and all_tracepoints to use references instead of
pointers.
Change-Id: I376826f812117cee1e6b199c384a10376973af5d
Reviewed-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
|
|
Remove the bp_location_pointer_iterator layer. Adjust all users of
breakpoint::locations to use references instead of pointers.
Change-Id: Iceed34f5e0f5790a9cf44736aa658be6d1ba1afa
Reviewed-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
|
|
Add convenience first_loc methods to struct breakpoint (const and
non-const overloads). A subsequent patch changes the list of locations
to be an intrusive_list and makes the actual list private, so these
spots would need to change from:
b->loc
to something ugly like:
*b->locations ().begin ()
That would make the code much heavier and not readable. There is a
surprisingly big number of places that access the first location of
breakpoints. Whether this is correct, or these spots fail to consider
the possibility of multi-location breakpoints, I don't know. But
anyhow, I think that using this instead:
b->first_loc ()
conveys the intention better than the other two forms.
Change-Id: Ibbefe3e4ca6cdfe570351fe7e2725f2ce11d1e95
Reviewed-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
|
|
I noticed a buglet in tui_update_variables:
...
entry = translate (tui_border_kind, tui_border_kind_translate_lrcorner);
if (tui_border_lrcorner != (chtype) entry->value)
{
tui_border_lrcorner = (entry->value < 0) ? ACS_LRCORNER : entry->value;
...
When assigning the new value to tui_border_lrcorner, an entry->value of -1 is
taken into account, but not when comparing to the current value of
tui_border_lrcorner.
Fix this by introducing:
...
int val = (entry->value < 0) ? ACS_LRCORNER : entry->value;
...
and using this in both comparison and assignment.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
|
|
Currently, for a source file containing only 5 lines, we also show line
numbers 6 and 7 if they're in scope of the source window:
...
0 +-compact-source.c----------------+
1 |___3_{ |
2 |___4_ return 0; |
3 |___5_} |
4 |___6_ |
5 |___7_ |
6 +---------------------------------+
...
Fix this by not showing line numbers not in a source file, such that we have instead:
...
0 +-compact-source.c----------------+
1 |___3_{ |
2 |___4_ return 0; |
3 |___5_} |
4 | |
5 | |
6 +---------------------------------+
...
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Suggested-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
Andrew pointed out that the behaviour as tested in gdb.tui/compact-source.exp
is incorrect:
...
0 +-compact-source.c--------------------------------------------------------+
1 |___3_{ |
2 |___4_ return 0; |
3 |___5_} |
4 |___6_ |
5 |___7_ |
6 |___8_ |
7 |___9_ |
8 +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
...
The last line number in the source file is 5, and there are 7 lines to display
source lines, so if we'd scroll all the way down, the first line number in the
source window would be 5, and the last one would be 11.
To represent 11 we'd need 2 digits, so we expect to see ___04_ here instead of
___4_, even though all line numbers currently in the src window (3-9) can be
represented with only 1 digit.
Fix this in tui_source_window::set_contents, by updating the computation of
max_line_nr:
...
- int max_line_nr = std::max (lines_in_file, last_line_nr_in_window);
+ int max_line_nr = lines_in_file + nlines - 1;
...
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Co-Authored-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
Consider a hello.c, with less than 10 lines:
...
$ wc -l hello.c
8 hello.c
...
and compiled with -g into an a.out.
With compact-source off:
...
$ gdb -q a.out \
-ex "set tui border-kind ascii" \
-ex "maint set tui-left-margin-verbose on" \
-ex "set tui compact-source off" \
-ex "tui enable"
...
we get:
...
+-./data/hello.c-----------------------+
|___000005_{ |
|___000006_ printf ("hello\n"); |
|___000007_ return 0; |
|___000008_} |
|___000009_ |
|___000010_ |
|___000011_ |
...
but with compact-source on:
...
+-./data/hello.c-----------------------+
|___5{ |
|___6 printf ("hello\n"); |
|___7 return 0; |
|___8} |
|___9 |
|___1 |
|___1 |
...
There are a couple of problems with compact-source.
First of all the documentation mentions:
...
The default display uses more space for line numbers and starts the
source text at the next tab stop; the compact display uses only as
much space as is needed for the line numbers in the current file, and
only a single space to separate the line numbers from the source.
...
The bit about the default display and the next tab stop looks incorrect. The
source doesn't start at a tab stop, instead it uses a single space to separate
the line numbers from the source.
Then the documentation mentions that there's single space in the compact
display, but evidently that's missing.
Then there's the fact that the line numbers "10" and "11" are both abbreviated
to "1" in the compact case.
The abbreviation is due to allocating space for <lines in source>, which is
8 for this example, and takes a single digit. The line numbers though
continue past the end of the file, so fix this by allocating space for
max (<lines in source>, <last line in window>), which in this example takes 2
digits.
The missing space is due to some confusion about what the "1" here in
tui_source_window::set_contents represent:
...
double l = log10 ((double) offsets->size ());
m_digits = 1 + (int) l;
...
It could be the trailing space that's mentioned in tui-source.h:
...
/* How many digits to use when formatting the line number. This
includes the trailing space. */
int m_digits;
...
Then again, it could be part of the calculation for the number of digits
needed for printing. With this minimal example:
...
int main () {
for (int i = 8; i <= 11; ++i) {
double l = log10 ((double) i);
printf ("%d %d\n", i, (int)l);
}
return 0;
}
...
we get:
...
$ ./a.out
8 0
9 0
10 1
11 1
...
which shows that the number of digits needed for printing i is
"1 + (int)log10 ((double) i)".
Fix this by introducing named variables needed_digits and trailing_space, each
adding 1.
With the fixes, we get for compact-source on:
...
+-./data/hello.c-----------------------+
|___05_{ |
|___06_ printf ("hello\n"); |
|___07_ return 0; |
|___08_} |
|___09_ |
|___10_ |
|___11_ |
|...
Also fix the documentation and help text to actually match effect of
compact-source.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
|
|
I'd like to move some things so they become methods on struct ui. But
first, I think that struct ui and the related things are big enough to
deserve their own file, instead of being scattered through top.{c,h} and
event-top.c.
Change-Id: I15594269ace61fd76ef80a7b58f51ff3ab6979bc
|
|
With TERM=ansi, when resizing a TUI window from LINES/COLUMNS 31/118
(maximized) to 20/78 (de-maximized), I get a garbled screen (that ^L doesn't
fix) and a message:
...
@@ resize done 0, size = 77x20
...
with the resulting width being 77 instead of the expected 78.
[ The discrepancy also manifests in CLI, filed as PR30346. ]
The discrepancy comes from tui_resize_all, where we ask readline for the
screen size:
...
rl_get_screen_size (&screenheight, &screenwidth);
...
As it happens, when TERM is set to ansi, readline decides that the terminal
cannot auto-wrap lines, and reserves one column to deal with that, and as a
result reports back one less than the actual screen width:
...
$ echo $COLUMNS
78
$ TERM=xterm gdb -ex "show width" -ex q
Number of characters gdb thinks are in a line is 78.
$ TERM=ansi gdb -ex "show width" -ex q
Number of characters gdb thinks are in a line is 77.
...
In tui_resize_all, we need the actual screen width, and using a screenwidth of
one less than the actual value garbles the screen.
This is currently not causing trouble in testing because we have a workaround
in place in proc Term::resize. If we disable the workaround:
...
- stty columns [expr {$_cols + 1}] < $::gdb_tty_name
+ stty columns $_cols < $::gdb_tty_name
...
and dump the screen we get the same type of screen garbling:
...
0 +---------------------------------------+|
1 ||
2 ||
3 ||
...
Another way to reproduce the problem is using command "maint info screen".
After starting gdb with TERM=ansi, entering TUI, and issuing the command, we
get:
...
Number of characters curses thinks are in a line is 78.
...
and after maximizing and demaximizing the window we get:
...
Number of characters curses thinks are in a line is 77.
...
If we use TERM=xterm, we do get the expected 78.
Fix this by:
- detecting when readline will report back less than the actual screen width,
- accordingly setting a new variable readline_hidden_cols,
- using readline_hidden_cols in tui_resize_all to fix the resize problem, and
- removing the workaround in Term::resize.
The test-case gdb.tui/empty.exp serves as regression test.
I've applied the same fix in tui_async_resize_screen, the new test-case
gdb.tui/resize-2.exp serves as a regression test for that change. Without
that fix, we have:
...
FAIL: gdb.tui/resize-2.exp: again: gdb width 80
...
Tested on x86_64-linux.
PR tui/30337
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30337
|
|
Latest libc++[1] causes transitive include to <locale> when
<mutex> or <thread> header is included. This causes
gdb to not build[2] since <locale> defines isupper/islower etc.
functions that are explicitly macroed-out in safe-ctype.h to
prevent their use.
Use the suggestion from libc++ to include <locale> internally when
building in C++ mode to avoid build errors.
Use safe-gdb-ctype.h as the include instead of "safe-ctype.h"
to keep this isolated to gdb since rest of binutils
does not seem to use much C++.
[1]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144331
[2]: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/277967395
|
|
In commit 5d10a2041eb ("gdb: add string_file::release method") this was added:
...
+ std::string string_val = string.release ();
...
without updating subsequent uses of string.size (), which returns 0 after the
string.release () call.
Fix this by:
- using string_val.size () instead of string.size (), and
- adding an assert that would have caught this regression.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Reviewed-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
PR tui/30389
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30389
|
|
The m_digits member of tui_source_window is documented as having semantics:
...
/* How many digits to use when formatting the line number. This
includes the trailing space. */
...
The commit 1b6d4bb2232 ("Redraw both spaces between line numbers and source
code") started printing two trailing spaces instead:
...
- xsnprintf (text, sizeof (text), "%*d ", m_digits - 1, lineno);
+ xsnprintf (text, sizeof (text), "%*d ", m_digits - 1, lineno);
...
Now that PR30325 is fixed, this no longer has any effect.
Fix this by reverting to the original behaviour: print one trailing space
char.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
With a hello world a.out, and maint set tui-left-margin-verbose on, we have
this disassembly window:
...
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│___ 0x555555555149 <main> endbr64 │
│___ 0x55555555514d <main+4> push %rbp │
│___ 0x55555555514e <main+5> mov %rsp,%rbp │
│B+> 0x555555555151 <main+8> lea 0xeac(%rip),%rax│
│___ 0x555555555158 <main+15> mov %rax,%rdi │
...
Note the space between "B+>" and 0x555555555151. The space shows that a bit
of the left margin is not written, which is a problem because that location is
showing a character previously written, which happens to be a space, but also
may be something else, for instance a '[' as reported in PR tui/30325.
The problem is caused by confusion about the meaning of:
...
#define TUI_EXECINFO_SIZE 4
...
There's the meaning of defining the size of this zero-terminated char array:
...
char element[TUI_EXECINFO_SIZE];
...
which is used to print the "B+>" bit, which is 3 chars wide.
And there's the meaning of defining part of the size of the left margin:
...
int left_margin () const
{ return 1 + TUI_EXECINFO_SIZE + extra_margin (); }
...
where it represents 4 chars.
The discrepancy between the two causes the space between "B+>" and
"0x555555555151".
Fix this by redefining TUI_EXECINFO_SIZE to 3, and using:
...
char element[TUI_EXECINFO_SIZE + 1];
...
such that we have:
...
|B+>0x555555555151 <main+8> lea 0xeac(%rip),%rax │
...
This changes the layout of the disassembly window back to what it was before
commit 9e820dec13e ("Use a curses pad for source and disassembly windows"),
the commit that introduced the PR30325 regression.
This also changes the source window from:
...
│___000005__{ |
...
to:
...
│___000005_{ |
...
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30325
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
The TUI has two types of windows derived from tui_source_window_base:
- tui_source_window (the source window), and
- tui_disasm_window (the disassembly window).
The two windows share a common concept: the left margin.
With a hello world a.out, we can see the source window:
...
┌─/home/vries/hello.c───────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 5 { │
│B+> 6 printf ("hello\n"); │
│ 7 return 0; │
│ 8 } │
│ 9 │
│
...
where the left margin is the part holding "B+>" and the line number, and the
disassembly window:
...
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 0x555555555149 <main> endbr64 │
│ 0x55555555514d <main+4> push %rbp │
│ 0x55555555514e <main+5> mov %rsp,%rbp │
│B+> 0x555555555151 <main+8> lea 0xeac(%rip),%rax│
│ 0x555555555158 <main+15> mov %rax,%rdi │
...
where the left margin is just the bit holding "B+>".
Because the left margin contains some spaces, it's not clear where it starts
and ends, making it harder to observe problems related to it.
Add a new maintenance command "maint set tui-left-margin-verbose", that when
set to on replaces the spaces in the left margin with either '_' or '0',
giving us this for the source window:
...
┌─/home/vries/hello.c───────────────────────────────────────┐
│___000005__{ │
│B+>000006__ printf ("hello\n"); │
│___000007__ return 0; │
│___000008__} │
...
and this for the disassembly window:
...
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│___ 0x555555555149 <main> endbr64 │
│___ 0x55555555514d <main+4> push %rbp │
│___ 0x55555555514e <main+5> mov %rsp,%rbp │
│B+> 0x555555555151 <main+8> lea 0xeac(%rip),%rax│
│___ 0x555555555158 <main+15> mov %rax,%rdi │
...
Note the space between "B+>" and 0x555555555151. The space shows that a bit
of the left margin is not written, a problem reported as PR tui/30325.
Specifically, PR tui/30325 is about the fact that the '[' character from the
string "[ No Assembly Available ]" ends up in that same spot:
...
│B+>[0x555555555151 <main+8> lea 0xeac(%rip),%rax│
...
which only happens for certain window widths.
The new command allows us to spot the problem with any window width.
Likewise, when we revert the fix from commit 1b6d4bb2232 ("Redraw both spaces
between line numbers and source code"), we have:
...
┌─/home/vries/hello.c───────────────────────────────────────┐
│___000005_ { │
│B+>000006_ printf ("hello\n"); │
│___000007_ return 0; │
│___000008_ } │
...
showing a similar problem at the space between '_' and '{'.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
Replace spaces with tabs in a bunch of places.
Change-Id: If0f87180f1d13028dc178e5a8af7882a067868b0
|
|
During my audit of the use of gdb_exception with regard to QUIT
processing, I found a try/catch in the scoped_switch_fork_info
destructor.
Static analysis found this call path from the destructor to
maybe_quit():
scoped_switch_fork_info::~scoped_switch_fork_info()
-> remove_breakpoints()
-> remove_breakpoint(bp_location*)
-> remove_breakpoint_1(bp_location*, remove_bp_reason)
-> memory_validate_breakpoint(gdbarch*, bp_target_info*)
-> target_read_memory(unsigned long, unsigned char*, long)
-> target_read(target_ops*, target_object, char const*, unsigned char*, unsigned long, long)
-> maybe_quit()
Since it's not safe to do a 'throw' from a destructor, we simply
call set_quit_flag and, for gdb_exception_forced_quit, also
set sync_quit_force_run. This will cause the appropriate
exception to be rethrown at the next QUIT check.
Another case is the try / catch in tui_getc() in tui-io.c. The
existing catch swallows the exception. I've added a catch for
'gdb_exception_forced_quit', which also swallows the exception,
but also sets sync_quit_force_run and calls set_quit_flag in
order to restart forced quit processing at the next QUIT check.
This is required because it isn't safe to throw into/through
readline.
Thanks to Pedro Alves for suggesting this idea.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26761
Tested-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
|
|
I noticed that the TUI temporarily sets pagination_enabled and
gdb_stdout in one spot. However, I don't believe these settings are
necessary here, as a ui_file is passed to
gdbarch_print_registers_info. This patch removes these settings.
|
|
This commit finishes the task that was started in the previous
commit.
Now that all Python TUI window factories are correctly deleted when
the Python interpreter is shut down, we no longer need to dynamically
allocate the known_window_types map in tui-layout.c
This commit changes known_window_types to a statically allocated data
structure, removes the dynamic allocation from
initialize_known_windows, and then replaces lots of '->' with '.'
throughout this file.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
The documentation for gdb.register_window_type says:
"... It's an error to try to replace one of the built-in windows,
but other window types can be replaced. ..."
I take this to mean that if I imported a Python script like this:
gdb.register_window_type('my_window', FactoryFunction)
Then GDB would have a new TUI window 'my_window', which could be
created by calling FactoryFunction(). If I then, in the same GDB
session imported a script which included:
gdb.register_window_type('my_window', UpdatedFactoryFunction)
Then GDB would replace the old 'my_window' factory with my new one,
GDB would now call UpdatedFactoryFunction().
This is pretty useful in practice, as it allows users to iterate on
their window implementation within a single GDB session.
However, right now, this is not how GDB operates. The second call to
register_window_type is basically ignored and the old window factory
is retained.
This is because in tui_register_window (tui/tui-layout.c) we use
std::unordered_map::emplace to insert the new factory function, and
emplace doesn't replace an existing element in an unordered_map.
In this commit, before the emplace call, I now search for an already
existing element, and delete any matching element from the map, the
emplace call will then add the new factory function.
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
This patch implements a simplication that I suggested here:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-March/186320.html
Currently, the interp::exec virtual method interface is such that
subclass implementations must catch exceptions and then return them
via normal function return.
However, higher up the in chain, for the CLI we get to
interpreter_exec_cmd, which does:
for (i = 1; i < nrules; i++)
{
struct gdb_exception e = interp_exec (interp_to_use, prules[i]);
if (e.reason < 0)
{
interp_set (old_interp, 0);
error (_("error in command: \"%s\"."), prules[i]);
}
}
and for MI we get to mi_cmd_interpreter_exec, which has:
void
mi_cmd_interpreter_exec (const char *command, char **argv, int argc)
{
...
for (i = 1; i < argc; i++)
{
struct gdb_exception e = interp_exec (interp_to_use, argv[i]);
if (e.reason < 0)
error ("%s", e.what ());
}
}
Note that if those errors are reached, we lose the original
exception's error code. I can't see why we'd want that.
And, I can't see why we need to have interp_exec catch the exception
and return it via the normal return path. That's normally needed when
we need to handle propagating exceptions across C code, like across
readline or ncurses, but that's not the case here.
It seems to me that we can simplify things by removing some
try/catch-ing and just letting exceptions propagate normally.
Note, the "error in command" error shown above, which only exists in
the CLI interpreter-exec command, is only ever printed AFAICS if you
run "interpreter-exec console" when the top level interpreter is
already the console/tui. Like:
(gdb) interpreter-exec console "foobar"
Undefined command: "foobar". Try "help".
error in command: "foobar".
You won't see it with MI's "-interpreter-exec console" from a top
level MI interpreter:
(gdb)
-interpreter-exec console "foobar"
&"Undefined command: \"foobar\". Try \"help\".\n"
^error,msg="Undefined command: \"foobar\". Try \"help\"."
(gdb)
nor with MI's "-interpreter-exec mi" from a top level MI interpreter:
(gdb)
-interpreter-exec mi "-foobar"
^error,msg="Undefined MI command: foobar",code="undefined-command"
^done
(gdb)
in both these cases because MI's -interpreter-exec just does:
error ("%s", e.what ());
You won't see it either when running an MI command with the CLI's
"interpreter-exec mi":
(gdb) interpreter-exec mi "-foobar"
^error,msg="Undefined MI command: foobar",code="undefined-command"
(gdb)
This last case is because MI's interp::exec implementation never
returns an error:
gdb_exception
mi_interp::exec (const char *command)
{
mi_execute_command_wrapper (command);
return gdb_exception ();
}
Thus I think that "error in command" error is pretty pointless, and
since it simplifies things to not have it, the patch just removes it.
The patch also ends up addressing an old FIXME.
Change-Id: I5a6432a80496934ac7127594c53bf5221622e393
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
|
|
Add some additional debug output that I've found really useful while
working on the previous set of patches.
Unless tui debug is turned on, then there should be no user visible
changes with this commit.
|
|
While working on the previous couple of patches I noticed that when I
scroll the src and asm windows vertically, I get two refresh_window
calls.
The two calls can be traced back to
tui_source_window_base::update_source_window_as_is, in here we call
show_source_content, which calls refresh_window, and then
update_exec_info, which also calls refresh_window.
In this commit I propose making the refresh_window call in
update_exec_info optional. In update_source_window_as_is I'll then
call update_exec_info before calling show_source_content, and pass a
flag to update_exec_info to defer the refresh.
There are places where update_exec_info is used without any subsequent
refresh_window call (e.g. when a breakpoint is updated), so
update_exec_info does not to call refresh_window in some cases, which
is why I'm using a flag to control the refresh.
With this changes I'm now only seeing a single refresh_window call for
each vertical scroll.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
|
|
While working on the previous patches I noticed that in some cases I
was seeing two calls to tui_source_window_base::refresh_window when
scrolling the window horizontally.
The two calls would trigger in for the tui-disasm-long-lines.exp test
when the pad needed to be refilled. The two called both come from
tui_source_window_base::show_source_content. The first call is nested
within check_and_display_highlight_if_needed, while the second call is
done directly at the end of show_source_content.
The check_and_display_highlight_if_needed is being used to draw the
window box to the window, this is needed here because
show_source_content is what gets called when the window needs
updating, e.g. after a resize. We could potentially do the boxing in
refresh_window, but then we'd be doing it each time we scroll, even
though the box doesn't need changing in this case.
However, we can move the check_and_display_highlight_if_needed to be
the last thing done in show_source_content, this means that we can
rely on the refresh_window call within it to be our single refresh
call.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
|
|
This commit addresses an issue that is exposed by the test script
gdb.tui/tui-disasm-long-lines.exp, that is, tui_source_window_base
does not handle very long lines.
The problem can be traced back to the newpad call in
tui_source_window_base::show_source_content, this is where we allocate
a backing pad to hold the window content.
Unfortunately, there appears to be a limit to the size of pad that can
be allocated, and the gdb.tui/tui-disasm-long-lines.exp test goes
beyond this limit. As a consequence the newpad call fails and returns
nullptr.
It just so happens that the reset of the tui_source_window_base code
can handle the pad being nullptr (this happens anyway when the window
is first created, so we already depend on nullptr handling), so all
that happens is the source window displays no content.
... well, sort of ... something weird does happen in the command
window, we seem to see a whole bunch of blank lines. I've not
bothered to track down exactly what's happening there, but it's some
consequence of GDB attempting to write content to a WINDOW* that is
nullptr.
Before explaining my solution, I'll outline how things currently work:
Consider we have the following window content to display:
aaaaaaaaaa
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
ccccccccccccccc
the longest line here is 20 characters. If our display window is 10
characters wide, then we will create a pad that is 20 characters wide,
and then copy the lines of content into the pad:
.--------------------.
|aaaaaaaaaa |
|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb|
|ccccccccccccccc |
.--------------------.
Now we will copy a 10 character wide view into this pad to the
display, our display will then see:
.----------.
|aaaaaaaaaa|
|bbbbbbbbbb|
|cccccccccc|
.----------.
As the user scrolls left and right we adjust m_horizontal_offset and
use this to select which part of the pad is copied onto the display.
The benefit of this is that we only need to copy the content to the
pad once, which includes processing the ansi escape sequences, and
then the user can scroll left and right as much as they want
relatively cheaply.
The problem then, is that if the longest content line is very long,
then we try to allocate a very large pad, which can fail.
What I propose is that we allow both the pad and the display view to
scroll. Once we allow this, then it becomes possible to allocate a
pad that is smaller than the longest display line. We then copy part
of the content into the pad. As the user scrolls the view left and
right GDB will continue to copy content from the pad just as it does
right now. But, when the user scrolls to the edge of the pad, GDB
will copy a new block of content into the pad, and then update the
view as normal. This all works fine so long as the maximum pad size
is larger than the current window size - which seems a reasonable
restriction, if ncurses can't support a pad of a given size it seems
likely it will not support a display window of that size either.
If we return to our example above, but this time we assume that the
maximum pad size is 15 characters, then initially the pad would be
loaded like this:
.---------------.
|aaaaaaaaaa |
|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb|
|ccccccccccccccc|
.---------------.
Notice that the last 5 characters from the 'b' line are no longer
included in the pad. There is still enough content though to fill the
10 character wide display, just as we did before.
The pad contents remain unchanged until the user scrolls the display
right to this point:
.----------.
|aaaaa |
|bbbbbbbbbb|
|cccccccccc|
.----------.
Now, when the user scrolls right once more GDB spots that the user has
reached the end of the pad, and the pad contents are reloaded, like
this:
.---------------.
|aaaaa |
|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb|
|cccccccccc |
.---------------.
The display can now be updated from the pad again just like normal.
With this change in place the gdb.tui/tui-disasm-long-lines.exp test
now correctly loads the assembler code, and we can scroll around as
expected.
Most of the changes are pretty mundane, just updating to match the
above. One interesting change though is the new member function
tui_source_window_base::puts_to_pad_with_skip. This replaces direct
calls to tui_puts when copying content to the pad.
The content strings contain ansi escape sequences. When these strings
are written to the pad these escape sequences are translated into
ncurses attribute setting calls.
Now however, we sometimes only write a partial string to the pad,
skipping some of the leading content. Imagine then that we have a
content line like this:
"\033[31mABCDEFGHIJKLM\033[0m"
Now the escape sequences in this content mean that the actual
content (the 'ABCDEFGHIJKLM') will have a red foreground color.
If we want to copy this to the pad, but skip the first 3 characters,
then what we expect is to have the pad contain 'DEFGHIJKLM', but this
text should still have a red foreground color.
It is this problem that puts_to_pad_with_skip solves. This function
skips some number of printable characters, but processes all the
escape sequences. This means that when we do start printing the
actual content the content will have the expected attributes.
/
|
|
I noticed that tui_source_window_base::m_horizontal_offset was
protected, but could be made private, so lets do that.
This makes more sense in the context of a later commit where I plan to
add another member variable that is similar to m_horizontal_offset.
The new member variable could also be private.
So I had to choose, place the new member variable next to
m_horizontal_offset making it protected, but grouping similar
variables together, or make m_horizontal_offset private, and then add
the new variable as private too.
I chose to make m_horizontal_offset private, which is this commit.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
|
|
This commit improves (I think) the errors from the tui focus command.
There are a number of errors that can be triggered by the focus
command, they include:
(1) Window name "NAME" is ambiguous
(2) Unrecognized window name "NAME"
(3) Window "NAME" cannot be focused
Error (1) is triggered when the user gives a partial window name, and
the name matches multiple windows in the current layout.
It is worth noting that the ambiguity must be within the current
layout; if the partial name matches one window in the current layout,
and one or more windows not in the current layout, then this is not
ambiguous, and focus will shift to the matching window in the current
layout.
This error was not previous being tested, but in this commit I make
use of the Python API to trigger and test this error.
Error (3) is simple enough, and was already being tested. This is
triggered by something like 'focus status'. The named window needs to
be present in the current layout, and non-focusable in order to
trigger the error.
Error (2) is what I'd like to improve in this commit. This error
triggers if the name the user gives doesn't match any window in the
current layout. Even if GDB does know about the window, but the
window isn't in the current layout, then GDB will say it doesn't
recognize the window name.
In this commit I propose to to split this error into three different
errors. These will be:
(a) Unrecognized window name "NAME"
(b) No windows matching "NAME" in the current layout
(c) Window "NAME" is not in the current layout
Error (a) is the same as before, but will now only trigger if GDB
doesn't know about window NAME at all. If the window is known, but
not in the current layout then one of the other errors will trigger.
Error (b) will trigger if NAME is ambiguous for multiple windows that
are not in the current layout. If NAME identifies a single window in
the current layout then that window will continue to be selected, just
as it currently is. Only in the case where NAME doesn't identify a
window in the current layout do we then check all the other known
windows, if NAME matches multiple of these, then (b) is triggered.
Finally, error (c) is used when NAME uniquely identifies a single
window that is not in the current layout.
The hope with these new errors is that the user will have a better
understanding of what went wrong. Instead of GDB claiming to not know
about a window, the mention of the current layout will hint to the
user that they should first switch layouts.
There are tests included for all the new errors.
|
|
Make use of a scoped_restore object in tui_mld_read_key instead of
doing a manual save/restore.
I don't think the existing code can throw an exception, so this is
just a cleanup rather than a bug fix.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
|
|
While working on the previous couple of commits, I noticed that the
'focus' command would happily suggest 'status' as a possible focus
completion, even though the 'status' window is non-focusable, and,
after the previous couple of commits, trying to focus the status
window will result in an error.
This commit improves the tab-completion results for the focus command
so that the status window is not included.
|
|
While working on the previous commit, I realised that there was an
error in tui_set_focus_command that could never be triggered.
Since the big tui rewrite (adding dynamic layouts) it is no longer
true that there is a tui_win_info object for every window at all
times. We now only create a tui_win_info object for a particular
window, when the window is part of the current layout. As a result,
if we have a tui_win_info pointer, then the window must be visible
inside tui_set_focus_command (this function calls tui_enable as its
first action, which makes the current layout visible).
The gdb.tui/tui-focus.exp test script exercises this area of code, and
doesn't trigger the assert, nor do any of our other existing tui
tests.
|
