aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-03-25gdb: fix b/p conditions with infcalls in multi-threaded inferiorsAndrew Burgess6-0/+889
This commit fixes bug PR 28942, that is, creating a conditional breakpoint in a multi-threaded inferior, where the breakpoint condition includes an inferior function call. Currently, when a user tries to create such a breakpoint, then GDB will fail with: (gdb) break infcall-from-bp-cond-single.c:61 if (return_true ()) Breakpoint 2 at 0x4011fa: file /tmp/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/infcall-from-bp-cond-single.c, line 61. (gdb) continue Continuing. [New Thread 0x7ffff7c5d700 (LWP 2460150)] [New Thread 0x7ffff745c700 (LWP 2460151)] [New Thread 0x7ffff6c5b700 (LWP 2460152)] [New Thread 0x7ffff645a700 (LWP 2460153)] [New Thread 0x7ffff5c59700 (LWP 2460154)] Error in testing breakpoint condition: Couldn't get registers: No such process. An error occurred while in a function called from GDB. Evaluation of the expression containing the function (return_true) will be abandoned. When the function is done executing, GDB will silently stop. Selected thread is running. (gdb) Or, in some cases, like this: (gdb) break infcall-from-bp-cond-simple.c:56 if (is_matching_tid (arg, 1)) Breakpoint 2 at 0x401194: file /tmp/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/infcall-from-bp-cond-simple.c, line 56. (gdb) continue Continuing. [New Thread 0x7ffff7c5d700 (LWP 2461106)] [New Thread 0x7ffff745c700 (LWP 2461107)] ../../src.release/gdb/nat/x86-linux-dregs.c:146: internal-error: x86_linux_update_debug_registers: Assertion `lwp_is_stopped (lwp)' failed. A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable. The precise error depends on the exact thread state; so there's race conditions depending on which threads have fully started, and which have not. But the underlying problem is always the same; when GDB tries to execute the inferior function call from within the breakpoint condition, GDB will, incorrectly, try to resume threads that are already running - GDB doesn't realise that some threads might already be running. The solution proposed in this patch requires an additional member variable thread_info::in_cond_eval. This flag is set to true (in breakpoint.c) when GDB is evaluating a breakpoint condition. In user_visible_resume_ptid (infrun.c), when the in_cond_eval flag is true, then GDB will only try to resume the current thread, that is, the thread for which the breakpoint condition is being evaluated. This solves the problem of GDB trying to resume threads that are already running. The next problem is that inferior function calls are assumed to be synchronous, that is, GDB doesn't expect to start an inferior function call in thread #1, then receive a stop from thread #2 for some other, unrelated reason. To prevent GDB responding to an event from another thread, we update fetch_inferior_event and do_target_wait in infrun.c, so that, when an inferior function call (on behalf of a breakpoint condition) is in progress, we only wait for events from the current thread (the one evaluating the condition). In do_target_wait I had to change the inferior_matches lambda function, which is used to select which inferior to wait on. Previously the logic was this: auto inferior_matches = [&wait_ptid] (inferior *inf) { return (inf->process_target () != nullptr && ptid_t (inf->pid).matches (wait_ptid)); }; This compares the pid of the inferior against the complete ptid we want to wait on. Before this commit wait_ptid was only ever minus_one_ptid (which is special, and means any process), and so every inferior would match. After this commit though wait_ptid might represent a specific thread in a specific inferior. If we compare the pid of the inferior to a specific ptid then these will not match. The fix is to compare against the pid extracted from the wait_ptid, not against the complete wait_ptid itself. In fetch_inferior_event, after receiving the event, we only want to stop all the other threads, and call inferior_event_handler with INF_EXEC_COMPLETE, if we are not evaluating a conditional breakpoint. If we are, then all the other threads should be left doing whatever they were before. The inferior_event_handler call will be performed once the breakpoint condition has finished being evaluated, and GDB decides to stop or not. The final problem that needs solving relates to GDB's commit-resume mechanism, which allows GDB to collect resume requests into a single packet in order to reduce traffic to a remote target. The problem is that the commit-resume mechanism will not send any resume requests for an inferior if there are already events pending on the GDB side. Imagine an inferior with two threads. Both threads hit a breakpoint, maybe the same conditional breakpoint. At this point there are two pending events, one for each thread. GDB selects one of the events and spots that this is a conditional breakpoint, GDB evaluates the condition. The condition includes an inferior function call, so GDB sets up for the call and resumes the one thread, the resume request is added to the commit-resume queue. When the commit-resume queue is committed GDB sees that there is a pending event from another thread, and so doesn't send any resume requests to the actual target, GDB is assuming that when we wait we will select the event from the other thread. However, as this is an inferior function call for a condition evaluation, we will not select the event from the other thread, we only care about events from the thread that is evaluating the condition - and the resume for this thread was never sent to the target. And so, GDB hangs, waiting for an event from a thread that was never fully resumed. To fix this issue I have added the concept of "forcing" the commit-resume queue. When enabling commit resume, if the force flag is true, then any resumes will be committed to the target, even if there are other threads with pending events. A note on authorship: this patch was based on some work done by Natalia Saiapova and Tankut Baris Aktemur from Intel[1]. I have made some changes to their work in this version. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28942 [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-October/172454.html Co-authored-by: Natalia Saiapova <natalia.saiapova@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> Tested-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Tested-By: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
2024-03-25[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.ada/tagged-lookup.exp with gcc <= 12Tom de Vries1-1/+1
With gcc 13, test-case gdb.ada/tagged-lookup.exp passes for me, but with gcc 12, I get: ... (gdb) set debug symtab-create 1^M (gdb) print *the_local_var^M ... $1 = (n => 2)^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/tagged-lookup.exp: only one CU expanded ... The problem is that this fails: ... -re -wrap ".* = \\\(n => $decimal\\\)" { if {$found_pck + $found_pck2 == 1} { pass $gdb_test_name } else { fail $gdb_test_name } ... because $found_pck == 0 and $found_pck2 == 0. Indeed, with gcc 13 we have: ... $ grep "start_subfile: name = .*/tagged-lookup/" gdb.log | sed 's%.*/%%' b~foo.adb b~foo.adb b~foo.adb b~foo.ads pck2.adb pck2.adb pck2.ads pck2.adb pck2.ads ... and with gcc 12: ... $ grep "start_subfile: name = .*/tagged-lookup/" gdb.log | sed 's%.*/%%' b~foo.adb b~foo.adb b~foo.adb b~foo.ads ... Fix this by checking for "$found_pck + $found_pck2 <= 1" instead. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR testsuite/31514 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31514
2024-03-25[gdb/testsuite] Fix tdlabel_re referencesTom de Vries4-2/+5
Commit 467a34bb9e6 ("gdb tests: Allow for "LWP" or "process" in thread IDs from info threads") introduces a new global variable tdlabel_re, but fails to indicate it's global when used in procs in four test-cases. Fix this by adding "global tdlabel_re". Tested on aarch64-linux.
2024-03-22gdb tests: Allow for "LWP" or "process" in thread IDs from info threadsJohn Baldwin24-53/+62
Several tests assume that the first word after a thread ID in 'info threads' output is "Thread". However, several targets use "LWP" instead such as the FreeBSD and NetBSD native targets. The Linux native target also uses "LWP" if libthread_db is not being used. Targets that do not support threads use "process" as the first word via normal_pid_to_str. Add a tdlabel_re global variable as a regular-expression for a thread label in `info threads' that matches either "process", "Thread", or "LWP". Some other tests in the tree don't require a specific word, and some targets may use other first words (e.g. OpenBSD uses "thread" and Ravenscar threads use "Ravenscar Thread").
2024-03-22Teach GDB to generate sparse core files (PR corefiles/31494)Pedro Alves1-104/+134
This commit teaches GDB's gcore command to generate sparse core files (if supported by the filesystem). To create a sparse file, all you have to do is skip writing zeros to the file, instead lseek'ing-ahead over them. The sparse logic is applied when writing the memory sections, as that's where the bulk of the data and the zeros are. The commit also tweaks gdb.base/bigcore.exp to make it exercise gdb-generated cores in addition to kernel-generated cores. We couldn't do that before, because GDB's gcore on that test's program would generate a multi-GB non-sparse core (16GB on my system). After this commit, gdb.base/bigcore.exp generates, when testing with GDB's gcore, a much smaller core file, roughly in line with what the kernel produces: real sizes: $ du --hu testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/bigcore/bigcore.corefile.* 2.2M testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/bigcore/bigcore.corefile.gdb 2.0M testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/bigcore/bigcore.corefile.kernel apparent sizes: $ du --hu --apparent-size testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/bigcore/bigcore.corefile.* 16G testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/bigcore/bigcore.corefile.gdb 16G testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/bigcore/bigcore.corefile.kernel Time to generate the core also goes down significantly. On my machine, I get: when writing to an SSD, from 21.0s, down to 8.0s when writing to an HDD, from 31.0s, down to 8.5s The changes to gdb.base/bigcore.exp are smaller than they look at first sight. It's basically mostly refactoring -- moving most of the code to a new procedure which takes as argument who should dump the core, and then calling the procedure twice. I purposely did not modernize any of the refactored code in this patch. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31494 Reviewed-By: Lancelot Six <lancelot.six@amd.com> Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Reviewed-By: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Change-Id: I2554a6a4a72d8c199ce31f176e0ead0c0c76cff1
2024-03-21Implement Ada 2022 delta aggregatesTom Tromey4-0/+138
Ada 2022 includes a "delta aggregates" feature that can sometimes simplify aggregate creation. This patch implements this feature for GDB.
2024-03-20[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.server/server-connect.exp for missing ipv6Tom de Vries2-0/+6
On a system without ipv6 support enabled, when running test-case gdb.server/server-connect.exp, it takes about 4 minutes, and I get: ... builtin_spawn gdbserver --once ::1:2347 server-connect^M Can't open socket: Address family not supported by protocol.^M Exiting^M PASS: gdb.server/server-connect.exp: tcp6: start gdbserver target remote tcp6:::1:2347^M A program is being debugged already. Kill it? (y or n) y^M could not connect: Address family not supported by protocol.^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.server/server-connect.exp: tcp6: connect to gdbserver using tcp6:::1 ... Fix this by: - recognizing the error message in gdbserver_start, and returning an empty list to signal unsupported, and - handling the unsupported response in the test-case. This brings testing time down to 2 seconds, and gets me: ... UNSUPPORTED: gdb.server/server-connect.exp: tcp6: start gdbserver UNSUPPORTED: gdb.server/server-connect.exp: tcp6-with-brackets: start gdbserver UNSUPPORTED: gdb.server/server-connect.exp: udp6: start gdbserver UNSUPPORTED: gdb.server/server-connect.exp: udp6-with-brackets: start gdbserver ... Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR testsuite/31502 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31502
2024-03-20[gdb/testsuite] Handle core without build-id in gdb.base/corefile-buildid.expTom de Vries1-1/+13
On aarch64-linux (debian 12), when running test-case gdb.base/corefile-buildid.exp, I get: ... expecting exec file "debugdir-exec/.build-id/ec/f10ec5d39648774f8c35d3cf757c8db52f5163" info files^M Local core dump file:^M `build-exec/corefile-buildid.core', file type elf64-littleaarch64.^M 0x0000aaaac1d70000 - 0x0000aaaac1d71000 is load1^M ... 0x0000ffffffa8b000 - 0x0000ffffffaac000 is load16^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/corefile-buildid.exp: exec: info files ... The problem is that the test-case expect the build-id to be available in the core file, while it isn't. Fix this by detecting that the build-id isn't available in the core file using eu-readelf, as in gdb.base/coredump-filter-build-id.exp. Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-20[gdb/testsuite] Add PR gdb/26967 KFAIL in two more test-casesTom de Vries4-14/+62
On aarch64-linux (debian 12), when running test-case gdb.base/longjmp-until-in-main.exp, I run into: ... (gdb) until 33^M warning: Breakpoint address adjusted from 0x70f727c678928489 to 0xfff727c678928489.^M Warning:^M Cannot insert breakpoint 0.^M Cannot access memory at address 0xfff727c678928489^M ^M 0x0000fffff7e3a580 in siglongjmp () from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp-until-in-main.exp: until $line, in main ... This is PR gdb/26967: no longjmp probe is available: ... (gdb) info probes stap libc ^longjmp$^M No probes matched.^M ... and glibc applies pointer mangling which makes it fairly difficult for gdb to get the longjmp target. There's a KFAIL for this in test-case gdb.base/longjmp.exp, added in commit b5e7cd5cd3d ("[gdb/testsuite] Add KFAILs in gdb.base/longjmp.exp"). Factor out new proc have_longjmp_probe, and use it to add similar KFAIL in this and one more test-case. Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-20Fix casting in-memory values of primitive types to const referenceHannes Domani3-0/+10
It's currently not possible to cast an in-memory value of a primitive type to const reference: ``` (gdb) p Q.id $1 = 42 (gdb) p (int&)Q.id $2 = (int &) @0x22fd0c: 42 (gdb) p (const int&)Q.id Attempt to take address of value not located in memory. ``` And if in a function call an argument needs the same kind of casting, it also doesn't work: ``` (gdb) l f3 39 int f3(const int &i) 40 { 41 return i; 42 } (gdb) p f3(Q.id) Attempt to take address of value not located in memory. ``` It's because when the constness of the type changes in a call to value_cast, a new not_lval value is allocated, which doesn't exist in the target memory. Fixed by ignoring const/volatile/restrict qualifications in value_cast when comparing cast type to original type, so the new value will point to the same location as the original value: ``` (gdb) p (int&)i $2 = (int &) @0x39f72c: 1 (gdb) p (const int&)i $3 = (const int &) @0x39f72c: 1 (gdb) p f3(Q.id) $4 = 42 ``` Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19423 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-20Fix reinterpret_cast for classes with multiple inheritanceHannes Domani2-0/+18
Currently a reinterpret_cast may change the pointer value if multiple inheritance is involved: ``` (gdb) p r $1 = (Right *) 0x22f75c (gdb) p reinterpret_cast<LeftRight*>(r) $2 = (LeftRight *) 0x22f758 ``` It's because value_cast is called in this case, which automatically does up- and downcasting. Fixed by simply using the target pointer type in a copy of the original value: ``` (gdb) p r $1 = (Right *) 0x3bf87c (gdb) p reinterpret_cast<LeftRight*>(r) $2 = (LeftRight *) 0x3bf87c ``` Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18861 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-20Fix comparison of array typesHannes Domani1-0/+1
Currently it's not possible to call functions if an argument is a pointer to an array: ``` (gdb) l f 1 int f (int (*x)[2]) 2 { 3 return x[0][1]; 4 } 5 6 int main() 7 { 8 int a[2][2] = {{0, 1}, {2, 3}}; 9 return f (a); 10 } (gdb) p f(a) Cannot resolve function f to any overloaded instance ``` This happens because types_equal doesn't handle array types, so the function is never even considered as a possibility. With array type handling added, by comparing element types and array bounds, the same works: ``` (gdb) p f(a) $1 = 1 ``` Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15398 Co-Authored-By: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-19Speed up lookup of "type_specific_data"Tom Tromey6-0/+170
I noticed that "info locals" on a certain large Ada program was very slow. I tracked this down to ada_get_tsd_type expanding nearly every CU in the program. This patch fixes the problem by changing this code to use the more efficient lookup_transparent_type which, unlike the Ada-specific lookup functions, does not try to find all matching instances. Note that I first tried fixing this by changing ada_find_any_type, but this did not work -- I may revisit this approach at some later date. Also note that the copyright dates on the test files are set that way because I copied them from another test. New in v2: the new test failed on the Linaro regression tester. Looking at the logs, it seems that gdb was picking up a 'value' from libgnat: $1 = {<text variable, no debug info>} 0xf7e227a4 <ada.calendar.formatting.value> This version renames the local variable in an attempt to work around this. v3: In v2, while trying to reproduce the problem locally, I accidentally forgot to commit one of the changes.
2024-03-19gdb/python: test exception case for gdb.solib_nameAndrew Burgess1-0/+15
The gdb.solib_name() and Progspace.solib_name() functions can throw an exception if the address argument is not a valid address, but this is not currently tested. This commit adds a couple of tests to check that exceptions are thrown correctly. An early version of this commit updated the documentation, but it was pointed out that lots of functions throw an exception if passed an argument of the wrong type, and we don't document all of these, it's kind-of assumed that passing an object of the incorrect type might result in an exception, so this updated version leaves the docs alone, but I do think adding the extra tests has value. There's no changes to GDB itself in this commit. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-19gdb/python: Fix segfault when iterating over empty linetableToby Lloyd Davies2-0/+95
symtab-> linetable () is set to null in buildsym_compunit::end_compunit_symtab_with_blockvector () if the symtab has no linetable. Attempting to iterate over this linetable using the Python API caused GDB to segfault. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-19[gdb] Further fix "value is not available" with debug frameTom de Vries1-1/+6
In commit 2aaba744467 ("[gdb] Fix "value is not available" with debug frame") I fixed a case in frame_unwind_register_value where using "set debug frame on" caused an "info frame" command to abort, reporting a "value is not available" error, due to the tpidruro register being unavailable. Subsequently, commit bbb12eb9c84 ("gdb/arm: Remove tpidruro register from non-FreeBSD target descriptions") removed the unavailable register, which caused a progression on test-case gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp. While investigating the progression (see PR python/31437), I found that the "debug frame" output of the test-case (when reverting commit bbb12eb9c84) showed a smilar problem: ... Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'>: value is not available^M ... that was absent without "debug frame". Fix this likewise in fetch_lazy_register, and update the test-case to check for the exception. Furthermore, I realized that there's both value::entirely_available and value::entirely_unavailable, and that commit 2aaba744467 handled the case of !entirely_available by printing unavailable. Instead, print: - "unavailable" for entirely_unavailable, and - "partly unavailable" for !entirely_unavailable && !entirely_available. Tested on x86_64-linux and arm-linux.
2024-03-18Fix Ada 'ptype' of access to arrayTom Tromey2-0/+15
ptype is a bit funny, in that it accepts both expressions and type names. It also evaluates the resulting expression using EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS -- which both seems sensible (as a user would you expect ptype to possibly cause inferior execution?), but is also a historical artifact of how expressions are implemented (there's no EVAL_FOR_TYPE). In Ada, calling a function with an array will sometimes result in a "thick pointer" array descriptor being made. This is essentially a structure holding a pointer and bounds information. Currently, in such a callee, printing the type of the array will yield funny results: (gdb) print str.all $1 = "Hello World" (gdb) ptype str type = array (<>) of character (gdb) ptype str.all type = array (1 .. 0) of character That "1 .. 0" is the result of an EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS branch trying to do "something" with an array descriptor, without doing too much. I tried briefly to make this code really dereference the array descriptor and get the correct runtime type. However, that proved to be tricky; it certainly can't be done for all access types, because that will cause dynamic type resolution and end up printing just the runtime type -- which with variants may be pretty far from what the user may expect. Instead, this patch arranges to just leave such types alone in this situation. I don't think this should have an extra effects, because things like array subscripting still work on thick pointers. This patch also touches arrayptr.exp, because in that case the access type is a "thin pointer", and this ensures that the output does not change in that scenario.
2024-03-18Set __file__ when source'ing a Python scriptTom Tromey1-0/+3
This patch arranges to set __file__ when source'ing a Python script. This fixes a problem that was introduced by the "source" rewrite, and then pointed out by Lancelot Six. Reviewed-by: Lancelot Six <lancelot.six@amd.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-03-18Clear board_info entry after waiting for processTom Tromey2-0/+16
When certain DAP tests are run in a certain order, dejagnu will throw an exception during shutdown. After adding many logging statements, I tracked this down to kill_wait_spawned_process not clearing the 'fileid' board_info entry, causing dejagnu to try to wait for the process a second time -- and fail. Tom de Vries then pointed out a second instance of this, which I tracked down to the same problem occurring when spawning gdbserver. This version of the patch fixes this by adding a new proc that can be used to clean up board_info after waiting for a process to exit. I'm not sure why this problem hasn't affected the test suite in the past. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31435 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-03-18gdb/testsuite: attach to i386 process stopped in vDSOAndrew Burgess2-0/+80
Fedora GDB has carried around a patch for a while which tested attaching to an i386 process which is stopped within the vDSO library region. Apparently, at some point in the distant past there was an issue finding symbol information for this region in this situation. I'm struggling to track down the precise details of what the original bug was, however, acquiring symbol information for the vDSO region is different than for "normal" shared libraries -- the vDSO information is synthesised within GDB during the attach / inferior creation process -- so it's not unreasonable to imagine that there could be a bug specifically in this area of GDB which wouldn't impact "normal" shared libraries. I looked for references to vDSO in our testsuite and couldn't find any tests that looked like they did the same sort of thing, so I'd like to propose adding this test to our testsuite. It's a pretty simple test, and doesn't take long to run, so the cost of adding this is not huge. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-17[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/list-no-debug.exp on debianTom de Vries3-5/+35
On debian 12, aarch64-linux I run into: ... (gdb) list .^M No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command.^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/list-nodebug.exp: first 'list .' ... The test-case expects some debug info, but none for main. Instead, there's no debug info at all. Fix this by adding another source file to the test-case, and compiling it with debug info. Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> PR testsuite/31290 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31290
2024-03-14Pass alignment when using GCC_C_FE_VERSION_2Tom Tromey2-0/+10
When the GCC compiler plugin responds with GCC_C_FE_VERSION_2, gdb can use the new 'finish_record_with_alignment' method. This lets gdb pass alignment information to the compiler, which in turn fixes the test case included in this patch. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31397
2024-03-14[gdb/tdep] Fix gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp on aarch64Tom de Vries2-35/+54
On aarch64-linux, with test-case gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp I run into: ... (gdb) watch data.u.size8twice[1]^M Hardware watchpoint 241: data.u.size8twice[1]^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp: watch data.u.size8twice[1] continue^M Continuing.^M FAIL: gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp: continue (timeout) FAIL: gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp: size8twice write ... This happens as follows. We start the exec and set an 8-byte hardware watchpoint on data.u.size8twice[1] at address 0x440048: ... (gdb) p sizeof (data.u.size8twice[1]) $1 = 8 (gdb) p &data.u.size8twice[1] $2 = (uint64_t *) 0x440048 <data+16> ... We continue execution, and a 16-byte write at address 0x440040 triggers the hardware watchpoint: ... 4101c8: a9000801 stp x1, x2, [x0] ... When checking whether a watchpoint has triggered in aarch64_stopped_data_address, we check against address 0x440040 (passed in parameter addr_trap). This behaviour is documented: ... /* ADDR_TRAP reports the first address of the memory range accessed by the CPU, regardless of what was the memory range watched. ... */ ... and consequently the matching logic compares against an addr_watch_aligned: ... && addr_trap >= addr_watch_aligned && addr_trap < addr_watch + len) ... However, the comparison fails: ... (gdb) p /x addr_watch_aligned $3 = 0x440048 (gdb) p addr_trap >= addr_watch_aligned $4 = false ... Consequently, aarch64_stopped_data_address returns false, and stopped_by_watchpoint returns false, and watchpoints_triggered returns 0, which make infrun think it's looking at a delayed hardware breakpoint/watchpoint trap: ... [infrun] handle_signal_stop: stop_pc=0x4101c8 [infrun] handle_signal_stop: delayed hardware breakpoint/watchpoint trap, ignoring ... Infrun then ignores the trap and continues, but runs into the same situation again and again, causing a hang which then causes the test timeout. Fix this by allowing a match 8 bytes below addr_watch_aligned. This introduces the possibility for false positives, so we only do this for regular "value changed" watchpoints. An earlier version of this patch worked by aligning addr_watch_aligned to 16 instead of 8: ... - const CORE_ADDR addr_watch_aligned = align_down (state->dr_addr_wp[i], 8); + const CORE_ADDR addr_watch_aligned = align_down (state->dr_addr_wp[i], 16); ... but while that fixed the test-case, it didn't fix the problem completely, so extend the test-case to check more scenarios. Tested on aarch64-linux. Tested-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> PR tdep/29423 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29423
2024-03-11Remove tui-out.[ch]Tom Tromey1-0/+2
The other day on irc, we were discussing the "m_line" hack in tui-out.c, and I mentioned that it would be nice to replace this with a new ui_out_flag. Later, I looked at ui_out_flag and found: ui_source_list = (1 << 0), ... and sure enough, this is tested already. This patch removes tui-out.[ch] and changes the TUI to use an ordinary cli-out object without this flag set. As far as I can tell, this doesn't affect behavior at all -- the TUI tests all pass, and interactively I tried switching stack frames, "list", etc, and it all seems to work. New in v2: fixed the problem pointed out by Keith, and added a test case for that scenario. Reviewed-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-03-11Special case NULL pointers in dynamic type resolutionTom Tromey3-2/+71
commit f18fc7e5 ("gdb, types: Resolve pointer types dynamically") caused a regression on a test case in the AdaCore internal test suite. The issue here is that gdb would try to resolve the type of a dynamic pointer that happened to be NULL. In this case, the "Location address is not set." error would end up being thrown from the DWARF expression evaluator. I think it makes more sense to special-case NULL pointers and not try to resolve their target type, as that type can't really be accessed anyway. This patch implements this idea, and also adds the missing Ada test case.
2024-03-11gdb/testsuite: reformat file with a more recent version of blackAndrew Burgess1-1/+0
A Python file in my previous commit (5eb2254a1d1) was formatted with an older version of black, which gives slightly different results. Reformat with a newer version of black. This should make our post-commit testing happy again. No functional changes in this commit.
2024-03-11gdb/unwinders: better support for $pc not savedAndrew Burgess3-0/+232
This started with a Red Hat bug report which can be seen here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850710 The problem reported here was using GDB on GNU/Linux for S390, the user stepped into JIT generated code. As they enter the JIT code GDB would report 'PC not saved', and this same message would be reported after each step/stepi. Additionally, the user had 'set disassemble-next-line on', and once they entered the JIT code this output was not displayed, nor were any 'display' directives displayed. The user is not making use of the JIT plugin API to provide debug information. But that's OK, they aren't expecting any source level debug here, they are happy to use 'stepi', but the missing 'display' directives are a problem, as is the constant 'PC not saved' (error) message. What is happening here is that as GDB is failing to find any debug information for the JIT generated code, it is falling back on to the S390 prologue unwinder to try and unwind frame #0. Unfortunately, without being able to identify the function boundaries, the S390 prologue scanner can't help much, in fact, it doesn't even suggest an arbitrary previous $pc value (some targets that use a link-register will, by default, assume the link-register contains the previous $pc), instead the S390 will just say, "sorry, I have no previous $pc value". The result of this is that when GDB tries to find frame #1 we end throwing an error from frame_unwind_pc (the 'PC not saved' error). This error is not caught anywhere except at the top-level interpreter loop, and so we end up skipping all the 'display' directive handling. While thinking about this, I wondered, could I trigger the same error using the Python Unwinder API? What happens if a Python unwinder claims a frame, but then fails to provide a previous $pc value? Turns out that exactly the same thing happens, which is great, as that means we now have a way to reproduce this bug on any target. And so the test included with this patch does just this. I have a Python unwinder that claims a frame, but doesn't provide any previous register values. I then do two tests, first I stop in the claimed frame (i.e. frame #0 is the frame that can't be unwound), I perform a few steps, and check the backtrace. And second, I stop in a child of the problem frame (i.e. frame #1 is the frame that can't be unwound), and from here I check the backtrace. While all this is going on I have a 'display' directive in place, and each time GDB stops I check that the display directive triggers. Additionally, when checking the backtrace, I am checking that the backtrace finishes with the message 'Backtrace stopped: frame did not save the PC'. As for the fix I chose to add a call to frame_unwind_pc directly to get_prev_frame_always_1. Calling frame_unwind_pc will cache the unwound $pc value, so this doesn't add much additional work as immediately after the new frame_unwind_pc call, we call get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle, which actually generates the previous frame, which will always (I think) require a call to frame_unwind_pc anyway. The reason for adding the frame_unwind_pc call into get_prev_frame_always_1, is that if the frame_unwind_pc call fails we want to set the frames 'stop_reason', and get_prev_frame_always_1 seems to be the place where this is done, so I wanted to keep the new stop_reason setting code next to all the existing stop_reason setting code. Additionally, once we enter get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle we actually create the previous frame, then, if it turns out that the previous frame can't be created we need to remove the frame .. this seemed more complex than just making the check in get_prev_frame_always_1. With this fix in place the original S390 bug is fixed, and also the test added in this commit, that uses the Python API, is also fixed. Reviewed-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2024-03-11gdb/testsuite: Reduce gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp reliance on libc symbolsGuinevere Larsen1-7/+41
The test gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp demanded GDB to fully unwind and print the names of all functions. However, some of the functions are from the libc library, and so the test implicitly demanded libc symbols to be available, and would fail otherwise, as was raised in PR gdb/31293. This commit changes it so we only explicitly check for functions that are not provided by threadcrash.c if they are indeed available. Tested on arm-linux and x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31293
2024-03-11gdb/testsuite: Simplify gdb.threads/threadcrash.expTom de Vries1-29/+60
I noticed in gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp that the usage of test_list is somewhat convoluted. Simplify the test-case by storing a classification instead of a pattern in test_list. Tested on arm-linux and x86_64-linux.
2024-03-11gdb/testsuite: Use _inferior_thread_count in gdb.threads/threadcrash.expGuinevere Larsen1-21/+2
A linaro PR [1] reports that the gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp test-case fails to cout the number of threads in the inferior: ... FAIL: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_gcore: $thread_count == 7 FAIL: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_gcore: $thread_count == [llength $test_list] ... Fix this by getting the convenience variable _inferior_thread_count as opposed to calculating it based on the output of "info threads". Tested on arm-linux and x86_64-linux. Reviewed-By: Lancelot Six <lancelot.six@amd.com> Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> [1] https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1120
2024-03-11gdb/testsuite: Fix gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp with check-readmoreTom de Vries1-10/+19
With check-readmore, I run into: ... FAIL: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_corefile: \ $thread_count == [llength $test_list] ... The problem is that the clauses in the gdb_test_multiple for "thread apply all backtrace" intent to match one line, but actually can match more than one line, and consequently a match for one type of thread can consume a line that was supposed to match another thread. For instance, there's this regexp: ... -re "\[^\n\]*syscall_task .location=SIGNAL_ALT_STACK\[^\n\]*" { ... It's limited at the end by \[^\n\]*, meaning the match stops at the end of the line. But it doesn't start with a ^, and consequently can match more than one line. The "\[^\n\]*" at the start doesn't prevent this, there's an implicit .* at the start of each pattern, unless it's anchored using a ^. Fix this by rewriting the regexps in a "^\r\n$hs$regexp$hs$eol" style, where: - hs is: \[^\n\]* (horizontal space), and - eol is (?=\r\n) (look-ahead end-of-line). It also turned out to be necessary to drop the -lbl switch, and introduce a corresponding explicit clause. The -lbl clause is placed ALAP, and consequently allowed the default fail clause to trigger. Tested on arm-linux and x86_64-linux.
2024-03-11gdb/testsuite: Reduce indentation in gdb.threads/threadcrash.expTom de Vries1-58/+58
In test-case gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp we have an unnecessarily indented gdb_test_multiple: ... gdb_test_multiple "thread apply all backtrace" \ "Get thread information" -lbl { -re "#\[0-9\]+\\\?\\\?\[^\n\]*" { ... Fix this by moving the command into a variable, allowing the "gdb_test_multiple ... {" to fit on a single 80 chars line. Tested on arm-linux and x86_64-linux.
2024-03-09[gdb/python] Normalize exceptions in gdbpy_err_fetchTom de Vries1-1/+1
With python 3.12, I run into: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.python/py-block.exp: check variable access python print (block['nonexistent'])^M Python Exception <class 'KeyError'>: 'nonexistent'^M Error occurred in Python: 'nonexistent'^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/py-block.exp: check nonexistent variable ... The problem is that that PyErr_Fetch returns a normalized exception, while the test-case matches the output for an unnormalized exception. With python 3.6, PyErr_Fetch returns an unnormalized exception, and the test passes. Fix this by: - updating the test-case to match the output for a normalized exception, and - lazily forcing normalized exceptions using PyErr_NormalizeException. Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-08Add return value to DAP scopeTom Tromey2-0/+118
A bug report in the DAP specification repository pointed out that it is typical for DAP implementations to put a function's return value into the outermost scope. This patch changes gdb to follow this convention. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31341 Reviewed-By: Kévin Le Gouguec <legouguec@adacore.com>
2024-03-05gdb/testsuite: fix duplicate test names in gdb.trace/circ.expAndrew Burgess1-31/+45
This fixes some duplicate test names in gdb.trace/circ.exp when using native-gdbserver and native-extended-gdbserver boards. In this test we set the trace buffer size twice. The same test name was used each time the size was adjusted. I've fixed this issue by: 1. Creating a new proc, set_trace_buffer_size, which factors out the code to change the buffer size, and uses test names based on the size we're setting the buffer too, 2. Calling the new proc each time we want to adjust the buffer size. After this the duplicate test names are resolved. There should be no change in what is tested after this commit.
2024-03-05gdb/testsuite: fix some more duplicate test names in gdb.trace/Andrew Burgess2-55/+46
This commit fixes some duplicate test names in the gdb.trace/ directory when run with the native-gdbserver and native-extended-gdbserver boards. In this case the duplicates relate to the calls to gdb_compile_pthreads which emits a fixed PASS message, as there are two calls to gdb_compile_pthreads we get a duplicate PASS message. In both cases the problem is fixed by adding a with_test_prefix around one of the compilations, however, I've made additional changes to clean up the tests a little while I was working on them: 1. Switch to use prepare_for_testing instead of gdb_compile_pthreads. By passing the 'pthreads' option this does call gdb_compile_pthreads under the hood, but using the standard compile function is cleaner, 2. Using prepare_for_testing removes the need to call clean_restart immediately afterwards, so those calls are removed, 3. I removed the unneeded $executable and $expfile globals, where the $executable global was used I've replaced this with $binfile, 4. When we compile two executables I've now given these different names so that both exist at the end of the test run, 5. Removed a gdb_reinitialize_dir call, this is covered by clean_restart, 6. Use gdb_test_no_output where it makes sense. I now see no duplicate test names when running these test scripts. There should be no change in what is being tested after this commit.
2024-03-01Fix TUI text centeringTom Tromey1-1/+4
In a couple of spots, the TUI tries to center some text in the window. Andrew noticed that the calculation is done strangely and the text ends up somewhat to the left of center. This patch fixes the problem. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31355
2024-02-27Explicitly quit gdb from DAP server threadTom Tromey1-0/+9
This changes the DAP code to explicitly request that gdb exit. Previously this could cause crashes, but with the previous cleanups, this should no longer happen. This also adds a tests that ensures that gdb exits with status 0.
2024-02-27Use the .py file in gdb.dap/pause.expTom Tromey1-1/+1
Tom de Vries pointed out that the gdb.dap/pause.exp test writes a Python file but then does not use it. This patch corrects the oversight. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31354 Reviewed-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2024-02-27Rewrite "python" command exception handlingTom Tromey31-184/+189
The "python" command (and the Python implementation of the gdb "source" command) does not handle Python exceptions in the same way as other gdb-facing Python code. In particular, exceptions are turned into a generic error rather than being routed through gdbpy_handle_exception, which takes care of converting to 'quit' as appropriate. I think this was done this way because PyRun_SimpleFile and friends do not propagate the Python exception -- they simply indicate that one occurred. This patch reimplements these functions to respect the general gdb convention here. As a bonus, some Windows-specific code can be removed, as can the _execute_file function. The bulk of this change is tweaking the test suite to match the new way that exceptions are displayed. These changes are largely uninteresting. However, it's worth pointing out the py-error.exp change. Here, the failure changes because the test changes the host charset to something that isn't supported by Python. This then results in a weird error in the new setup. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31354 Acked-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2024-02-27[gdb/testsuite] Reset errcnt and warncnt in default_gdb_initTom de Vries1-0/+9
Say we do: ... $ make check RUNTESTFLAGS="gdb.dap/ada-nested.exp gdb.dap/pause.exp" ... and add a perror at the end of pause.exp: ... dap_shutdown + +perror "foo" ... We run into: ... UNRESOLVED: gdb.dap/ada-nested.exp: compilation prog.adb ... This happens because the perror increases the errcnt, which is not reset at the end of the test-case, and consequently the first pass in the following test-case is changed into an unresolved. Version 1.6.3 of dejagnu contains a fix which produces an unresolved at the end of the test-case, which does reset the errcnt, but this is with version 1.6.1. Furthermore, we reset the errcnt in clean_restart, but the pass is produced before, so that doesn't help either. Fix this by resetting errcnt and warncnt in default_gdb_init. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR testsuite/31351 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31351
2024-02-27[gdb/testsuite] Remove KFAIL for PR ada/30908Tom de Vries2-44/+4
PR ada/30908 turns out to be a duplicate of PR ada/12607, which was fixed by commit d56fdf1b976 ("Refine Ada overload matching"). Remove the KFAILs for PR ada/30908. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30908
2024-02-27[gdb/testsuite] Fix test in gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.expTom de Vries1-1/+2
With test-case gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.exp, we run into: ... (gdb) python print (finishbp_default.hit_count) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 1, in <module> RuntimeError: Breakpoint 3 is invalid. Error while executing Python code. (gdb) PASS: gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.exp: normal conditions: \ check finishBP on default frame has been hit ... The test producing the pass is: ... gdb_test "python print (finishbp_default.hit_count)" "1.*" \ "check finishBP on default frame has been hit" ... so the pass is produced because the 1 in "line 1" matches "1.*". Temporary breakpoints are removed when hit, and consequently accessing the hit_count attribute of a temporary python breakpoint (gdb.Breakpoint class) is not possible, and as per spec we get a RuntimeError. So the RuntimeError is correct, and not specific to finish breakpoints. The test presumably attempts to match: ... (gdb) python print (finishbp_default.hit_count) 1 ... but most likely this output was never produced by any gdb version. Fix this by checking whether the finishbp_default breakpoint has hit by checking that finishbp_default.is_valid() is False. Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR testsuite/31391 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31391
2024-02-27arc: Don't build arc-analyze-prologue.S with -gYuriy Kolerov1-1/+7
arc-analyze-prologue.S test does not contain debug information thus it must be compiled without -g option. Otherwise GDB will try to unwind frames using debug information (which does not exist for .S code!) instead of analyzing frames manually. Approved-By: Shahab Vahedi <shahab@synopsys.com>
2024-02-26[gdb/testsuite] Dump dap.log.$n to gdb.log when exceptions foundTom de Vries1-0/+3
For a patch I submitted, the Linaro CI reported a failure: ... FAIL: gdb.dap/attach.exp: exceptions in log file ... I ran the test-case locally, and observed the same FAIL in the gdb.sum file. I then wanted to confirm that I reproduced the exact same problem, but realized that I couldn't because there's no way for me to know what exception occurred, and where, because that information is logged in the dap.log.$n file, and the Linaro CI only saves the gdb.sum and gdb.log files. This issue is even worse if only the CI can reproduce a FAIL. Fix this in dap_check_log_file by dumping dap.log.$n to gdb.log when exceptions are found. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-02-26[gdb/testsuite] Further handle long filenames in gdb.base/startup-with-shell.expTom de Vries1-0/+1
In commit 52498004a34 ("gdb/testsuite: handle long filenames in gdb.base/startup-with-shell.exp") we fixed a FAIL reported by the Linaro CI: ... (gdb) print argv[1] $1 = 0xfffed978 "<snip>/startup-with-shell/unique-file.unique-e"... (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/startup-with-shell.exp: startup_with_shell = on; \ run_args = *.unique-extension: first argument expanded ... PR testsuite/31410 reports a similar failure: ... (gdb) print argv[1] $1 = 0xfffeda96 "<snip>/startup-with-shell/*.unique-extens"... (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/startup-with-shell.exp: startup_with_shell = off; \ run_args = *.unique-extension: first argument not expanded ... Fix this in the same way, using "set print characters unlimited". Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31410
2024-02-26[gdb] Fix "value is not available" with debug frameTom de Vries3-0/+104
On arm-linux, with a started hello world, running "info frame" works fine, but when I set debug frame to on, I run into: ... (gdb) info frame ... [frame] frame_unwind_register_value: exit value is not available (gdb) ... The problem is here in frame_unwind_register_value: ... if (value->lazy ()) gdb_printf (&debug_file, " lazy"); else { int i; gdb::array_view<const gdb_byte> buf = value->contents (); ... where we call value->contents () while !value->entirely_available (). Fix this by checking value->entirely_available () and printing: ... [frame] frame_unwind_register_value: -> register=91 unavailable ... Tested on arm-linux. PR gdb/31369 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31369
2024-02-26gdb: Modify the output of "info breakpoints" and "delete breakpoints"Tiezhu Yang40-86/+87
The output of "info breakpoints" includes breakpoint, watchpoint, tracepoint, and catchpoint if they are created, so it should show all the four types are deleted in the output of "info breakpoints" to report empty list after "delete breakpoints". It should also change the output of "delete breakpoints" to make it clear that watchpoints, tracepoints, and catchpoints are also being deleted. This is suggested by Guinevere Larsen, thank you. $ make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/access-mem-running.exp" $ gdb/gdb gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/access-mem-running/access-mem-running [...] (gdb) break main Breakpoint 1 at 0x12000073c: file /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c, line 32. (gdb) watch global_counter Hardware watchpoint 2: global_counter (gdb) trace maybe_stop_here Tracepoint 3 at 0x12000071c: file /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c, line 27. (gdb) catch fork Catchpoint 4 (fork) (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y 0x000000012000073c in main at /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c:32 2 hw watchpoint keep y global_counter 3 tracepoint keep y 0x000000012000071c in maybe_stop_here at /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c:27 not installed on target 4 catchpoint keep y fork Without this patch: (gdb) delete breakpoints Delete all breakpoints? (y or n) y (gdb) info breakpoints No breakpoints or watchpoints. (gdb) info breakpoints 3 No breakpoint or watchpoint matching '3'. With this patch: (gdb) delete breakpoints Delete all breakpoints, watchpoints, tracepoints, and catchpoints? (y or n) y (gdb) info breakpoints No breakpoints, watchpoints, tracepoints, or catchpoints. (gdb) info breakpoints 3 No breakpoint, watchpoint, tracepoint, or catchpoint matching '3'. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2024-02-22[gdb/testsuite] Fix license text in gdb.reverse/map-to-same-line.{c,exp}Tom de Vries2-2/+2
I noticed in gdb.reverse/map-to-same-line.{c,exp} that the license urls are using some kind of indirection via urldefense.proofpoint.com. Fix this by removing this indirection. Tested on x86_64-linux. PR testsuite/31358 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31358
2024-02-22[gdb/dap] Fix race between dap exit and gdb exitTom de Vries1-0/+9
When DAP shuts down due to an EOF event, there's a race between: - gdb's main thread handling a SIGHUP, and - the DAP main thread exiting. Fix this by waiting for DAP's main thread exit during the gdb_exiting event. Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR dap/31380 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31380