aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-07-22gdb/testsuite: fix minor typo in a commentAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
Fix 'text' to 'test' in a test comment.
2024-07-21gdb/testsuite: Add missing 'require allow_gdbserver_tests'Andrew Burgess1-0/+2
The commit: commit 22836ca88591ac7efacf06d5b6db191763fd8aba Date: Tue May 21 09:57:49 2024 +0100 gdb: check for multiple matching build-id files Was missing a 'require allow_gdbserver_tests' in a gdbserver test. Add it now.
2024-07-21[gdb/testsuite] Fix scopes check in gdb.dap/rust-slices.expTom de Vries1-3/+3
When running test-case gdb.dap/rust-slices.exp on aarch64-linux (debian 12/bookworm), I run into: ... {"request_seq": 6, "type": "response", "command": "scopes", "body": {"scopes": [{"variablesReference": 1, "name": "Locals", "presentationHint": "locals", "expensive": false, "namedVariables": 3, "line": 28, "source": {"name": "rust-slices.rs", "path": "/home/linux/gdb/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dap/rust-slices.rs"}}, {"variablesReference": 2, "name": "Registers", "presentationHint": "registers", "expensive": false, "namedVariables": 261, "line": 28, "source": {"name": "rust-slices.rs", "path": "/home/linux/gdb/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dap/rust-slices.rs"}}]}, "success": true, "seq": 20}PASS: gdb.dap/rust-slices.exp: get scopes success FAIL: gdb.dap/rust-slices.exp: three scopes PASS: gdb.dap/rust-slices.exp: scope is locals PASS: gdb.dap/rust-slices.exp: locals presentation hint PASS: gdb.dap/rust-slices.exp: three vars in scope ... The test-case expects three scopes due to a rust compiler issue: ... # There are three scopes because an artificial symbol ends up in the # DWARF. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125126. gdb_assert {[llength $scopes] == 3} "three scopes" ... but it seems that the version used here (rustc 1.63.0, llvm 14.0.6) doesn't have this issue. Fix this by allowing two or three scopes, and changing the test name to "two scopes". Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> PR testsuite/31983 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31983
2024-07-20gdb: don't display inferior list for pending breakpointsAndrew Burgess3-0/+214
I noticed that in the 'info breakpoints' output, GDB sometimes prints the inferior list for pending breakpoints, this doesn't seem right to me. A pending breakpoint has no locations (at least, as far as we display things in the 'info breakpoints' output), so including an inferior list seems odd. Here's what I see right now: (gdb) info breakpoint 5 Num Type Disp Enb Address What 5 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> foo inf 1 (gdb) It's the 'inf 1' at the end of the line that I'm objecting too. To trigger this behaviour we need to be in a multi-inferior debug session. The breakpoint must have been non-pending at some point in the past, and so have a location assigned to it. The breakpoint becomes pending again as a result of a shared library being unloaded. When this happens the location itself is marked pending (via bp_location::shlib_disabled). In print_one_breakpoint_location, in order to print the inferior list we check that the breakpoint has a location, and that we have multiple inferiors, but we don't check if the location itself is pending. This commit adds that check, which means the output is now: (gdb) info breakpoint 5 Num Type Disp Enb Address What 5 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> foo (gdb) Which I think makes more sense -- indeed, the format without the inferior list is what we display for a pending breakpoint that has never had any locations assigned, so I think this change in behaviour makes GDB more consistent.
2024-07-19gdb-gdb.py: strip typedefs in intrusive_list printer assertionSimon Marchi1-0/+15
When debugging gdb itself and trying to print a intrusive_list that has more than one element, I get: File "/home/simark/build/binutils-gdb-all-targets/gdb/gdb-gdb.py", line 365, in _children_generator node_ptr = self._as_node_ptr(elem_ptr) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/simark/build/binutils-gdb-all-targets/gdb/gdb-gdb.py", line 345, in _as_node_ptr assert elem_ptr.type.code == gdb.TYPE_CODE_PTR ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ AssertionError This is because node_ptr is a typedef (intrusive_list_base_iterator::pointer). Add a call to strip_typedefs to get to the real type. Enhance gdb.gdb/python-helper.exp with a test that would have caught this bug. Change-Id: I3eaca8de5ed06d05756ed979332b6a431e15b700 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-07-18gdb: check for multiple matching build-id filesAndrew Burgess5-8/+380
Within the debug-file-directory GDB looks for the existence of a .build-id directory. Within the .build-id directory GDB looks for files with the form: .build-id/ff/4b4142d62b399499844924d53e33d4028380db.debug which contain the debug information for the objfile with the build-id ff4b4142d62b399499844924d53e33d4028380db. There appear to be two strategies for populating the .build-id directory. Ubuntu takes the approach of placing the actual debug information in this directory, so 4b4142d62b399499844924d53e33d4028380db.debug is an actual file containing the debug information. Fedora, RHEL, and SUSE take a slightly different approach, placing the debug information elsewhere, and then creating symlinks in the .build-id directory back to the original debug information file. The actual debug information is arranged in a mirror of the filesystem within the debug directory, as an example, if the debug-file-directory is /usr/lib/debug, then the debug information for /bin/foo can be found in /usr/lib/debug/bin/foo.debug. Where this gets interesting is that in some cases a package will install a single binary with multiple names, in this case a single binary will be install with either hard-links, or symlinks providing the alternative names. The debug information for these multiple binaries will then be placed into the /usr/lib/debug/ tree, and again, links are created so a single file can provide debug information for each of the names that binary presents as. An example file system might look like this (the [link] could be symlinks, but are more likely hard-links): /bin/ foo bar -> foo [ HARD LINK ] baz -> foo [ HARD LINK ] /usr/ lib/ debug/ bin/ foo.debug bar.debug -> foo.debug [ HARD LINK ] baz.debug -> foo.debug [ HARD LINK ] In the .build-id tree though we have a problem. Do we have a single entry that links to one of the .debug files? This would work; a user debugging any of the binaries will find the debug information based on the build-id, and will get the correct information, after all the .debug files are identical (same file linked together). But there is one problem with this approach. Sometimes, for *reasons* it's possible that one or more the linked binaries might get removed, along with its associated debug information. I'm honestly not 100% certain under what circumstances this can happen, but what I observe is that sometime a single name for a binary, and its corresponding .debug entry, can be missing. If this happens to be the entry that the .build-id link is pointing at, then we have a problem. The user can no longer find the debug information based on the .build-id link. The solution that Fedora, RHEL, & SUSE have adopted is to add multiple entries in the .build-id tree, with each entry pointing to a different name within the debug/ tree, a sequence number is added to the build-id to distinguish the multiple entries. Thus, we might end up with a layout like this: /bin/ foo bar -> foo [ HARD LINK ] baz -> foo [ HARD LINK ] /usr/ lib/ debug/ bin/ foo.debug bar.debug -> foo.debug [ HARD LINK ] baz.debug -> foo.debug [ HARD LINK ] .build-id/ a3/ 4b4142d62b399499844924d53e33d4028380db.debug -> ../../debug/bin/foo.debug [ SYMLINK ] 4b4142d62b399499844924d53e33d4028380db.1.debug -> ../../debug/bin/bar.debug [ SYMLINK ] 4b4142d62b399499844924d53e33d4028380db.2.debug -> ../../debug/bin/baz.debug [ SYMLINK ] With current master GDB, debug information will only ever be looked up via the 4b4142d62b399499844924d53e33d4028380db.debug link. But if 'foo' and its corresponding 'foo.debug' are ever removed, then master GDB will fail to find the debug information. Ubuntu seems to have a much better approach for debug information handling; they place the debug information directly into the .build-id tree, so there only ever needs to be a single entry for any one build-id. I wonder if/how they handle the case where multiple names might share a single .debug file, if one of those names is then uninstalled, how do they know the .debug file should be retained or not ... but I assume that problem either doesn't exist or has been solved. Anyway, for a while Fedora has carried a patch that handles the build-id sequence number logic. What's presented here is inspired by the Fedora patch, but has some changes to fix some issues. I'm aware that this is a patch that applies to only some (probably a minority) of distros. However, the logic is contained to only a single function in build-id.c, and isn't too complex, so I'm hoping that there wont be too many objections. For distros that don't have build-id sequence numbers there should be no impact. The sequence number approach still leaves the first file without a sequence number, and this is the first file that GDB (after this patch) checks for. The new logic only kicks in if the non-sequence numbered first file exists, but is a symlink to a non existent file; in this case GDB checks for the sequence numbered files instead. Tests are included. There is a small fix needed for gdb.base/sysroot-debug-lookup.exp, after this commit GDB now treats a target: sysroot where the target file system is local to GDB the same as if the sysroot had no target: prefix. The consequence of this is that GDB now resolves a symlink back to the real filename in the sysroot-debug-lookup.exp test where it didn't previously. As this behaviour is inline with the case where there is no target: prefix I think this is fine.
2024-07-17[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.arch/arm-pseudo-unwind.exp with unix/mthumbTom de Vries2-2/+16
When running test-case gdb.arch/arm-pseudo-unwind.exp with target board unix/mthumb, we run into: ... (gdb) continue^M Continuing.^M ^M Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.^M 0x00400f38 in ?? ()^M (gdb) FAIL: $exp: continue to breakpoint: continue to callee ... The test-case attempts to force arm-pseudo-unwind.c to be compiled in arm mode using additional_flags=-marm, but that's overridden by using target board unix/mthumb. This causes function main to be in thumb mode, and consequently function caller (which is called from main) is is executed as if it's in thumb mode, while it's actually in arm mode. Fix this by adding an intermediate function caller_trampoline in arm-pseudo-unwind.c, and hardcoding it to arm mode using __attribute__((target("arm"))). Likewise for test-case gdb.arch/arm-pseudo-unwind-legacy.exp. Tested on arm-linux. Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2024-07-16[gdb/testsuite] Simplify gdb.base/complex-parts.expTom de Vries1-39/+42
I noticed a lot of escaping in test-case gdb.base/complex-parts.exp. Make the test-case more readable by using: - string_to_regexp, and - {} instead of "". Tested on x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux.
2024-07-15Fix loading a saved recordingHannes Domani1-0/+2
Currently you get this assertion failure if you try to execute the inferior after loading a saved recording, when no recording was done earlier in the same gdb session: ``` $ gdb -q c -ex "record restore test.rec" Reading symbols from c... [New LWP 26428] Core was generated by `/tmp/c'. Restored records from core file /tmp/test.rec. (gdb) c Continuing. ../../gdb/inferior.c:293: internal-error: inferior* find_inferior_pid(process_stratum_target*, int): Assertion `pid != 0' failed. A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable. ``` The change in step-precsave.exp triggers this bug, since now the recording is loaded in a new gdb session, where record_full_resume_ptid was never set. The fix is to simply set record_full_resume_ptid when resuming a loaded recording. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31971 Approved-By: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2024-07-11gdb: add testcase for invalid record displayKévin Le Gouguec2-0/+97
More of a DWARF-generation non-regression test; fixed on the GCC side with 2024-06-03 "Implement wrap-around arithmetics in DWARF expressions" (f3d6d60d2ae). Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-07-02Accept unnamed array in gdb.ada/limited-length.expTom Tromey1-12/+9
Some compiler changes I'm working on cause a regression in gdb.ada/limited-length.exp -- with the changes, the array type is nameless and so is not mentioned in the max-value-size error message. Because the array type is nameless in the source code, this seems like an improvement to me, and so this patch changes the test to accept either form.
2024-06-26[gdb/testsuite] Minor cleanup in gdb.base/bg-execution-repeat.expTom de Vries1-8/+3
Simplify a gdb_test_multiple in test-case gdb.base/bg-execution-repeat.exp using "gdb_test -no-prompt-anchor". Suggested-By: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> Tested on x86_64-linux.
2024-06-26[gdb/testsuite] Fix timeout in gdb.base/bg-execution-repeat.expTom de Vries2-1/+26
I ran into the following test failure with test-case gdb.base/bg-execution-repeat.exp: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bg-execution-repeat.exp: c&: repeat bg command ^M Breakpoint 2, foo () at bg-execution-repeat.c:23^M 23 return 0; /* set break here */^M print 1^M $1 = 1^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bg-execution-repeat.exp: c&: input still accepted FAIL: gdb.base/bg-execution-repeat.exp: c&: breakpoint hit 2 (timeout) ... The failure can be easily reproduced by adding a sleep 5 here: ... + sleep 5 gdb_test "print 1" " = 1" "input still accepted" ... There's a race in the test-case, between: - the command handled in the foreground: the "print 1" command, and - the command handled in the background: the continue command. The current way of dealing with this is by putting the inferior to sleep for 5 seconds: ... foo (); sleep (5); foo (); ... with the aim that the "print 1" command will win the race. This method is both slow and unreliable. Fix this by making the inferior wait till the "print 1" command is done. This reduces running time from ~11s to ~1s. I also verified that the test-case still triggers on the original problem by applying this gdb/infcmd.c patch: ... -strip_bg_char (const char *args, int *bg_char_p) +strip_bg_char (const char *_args, int *bg_char_p) { - const char *p; + char *args = const_cast<char *>(_args); + char *p; if (args == nullptr || *args == '\0') { @@ -210,6 +211,7 @@ strip_bg_char (const char *args, int *bg_char_p) p--; while (p > args && isspace (p[-1])) p--; + *p = '\0'; ... Tested on x86_64-linux, with make-check-all.sh. PR testsuite/31794 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31794 Reviewed-By: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2024-06-25gdb: use alternative for demangled name for non-demangeable linkage namesSchimpe, Christina2-0/+100
In case a DIE contains a linkage name which cannot be demangled and a source language name (DW_AT_NAME) exists then we want to display this name instead of the non-demangeable linkage name. dwarf2_physname returns the linkage name in case the linkage name cannot be demangled. Before this patch we always set the returned physname as demangled name. This patch changes this by comparing the value of physname with the linkage name. Now after this change in case it is equals to the linkage name and if DW_AT_NAME exists then this is set as the demangled name otherwise like before still linkage name is used. For the reproducer, using the test source file added in this change: "gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-wrong-mangled-name.c" Here is an example of the DWARF where wrong linkage name is emitted by the compiler for the "func_demangled_test" function: subprogram { {MACRO_AT_range {func_demangled_test}} {linkage_name "_FUNC_WRONG_MANGLED__"} {name "func_demangled_test"} {external 1 flag} } subprogram { {MACRO_AT_range {main}} {external 1 flag} {name main} {main_subprogram 1 flag} } Before this change for a function having both DIEs DW_AT_name and DW_AT_LINKAGENAME but with the wrong linkage name info, the backtrace command shows following: (gdb) b func_demangled_test (gdb) r Breakpoint 1, 0x0000555555555131 in _FUNC_WRONG_MANGLED__ () (gdb) backtrace \#0 0x0000555555555131 in _FUNC_WRONG_MANGLED__ () \#1 0x000055555555514a in main () After the change now GDB shows the name emitted by DW_AT_NAME: (gdb) b func_demangled_test (gdb) r Breakpoint 1, 0x0000555555555131 in func_demangled_test () (gdb) backtrace \#0 0x0000555555555131 in func_demangled_test () \#1 0x000055555555514a in main () A new test is added to verify this change. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-24Fix gdb.lookup_type for function-local typesHannes Domani2-0/+11
Looking for a type defined locally in a function doesn't work any more since the introduction of TYPE_DOMAIN: ``` (gdb) python print (gdb.lookup_type ('main()::Local')) Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'>: No type named main()::Local. Error occurred in Python: No type named main()::Local. ``` cp_search_static_and_baseclasses was simply missing a check for SEARCH_TYPE_DOMAIN, now it works again: ``` (gdb) python print (gdb.lookup_type ('main()::Local')) Local ``` Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31922 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-21gdb/testsuite: analyze-racy-logs.py cleanupSimon Marchi1-9/+8
- Add type annotations - Use a raw string in one spot (where we call re.sub), to avoid an "invalid escape sequence" warning. - Remove unused "os" import. Change-Id: I0149cbb73ad2b05431f032fa9d9530282cb01e90 Reviewed-By: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2024-06-21[gdb/testsuite] Fix regexp in gdb.threads/stepi-over-clone.expTom de Vries1-1/+1
On fedora rawhide, I ran into: ... (gdb) continue^M Continuing.^M ^M Catchpoint 2 (call to syscall clone3), 0x000000000042097d in __clone3 ()^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/stepi-over-clone.exp: continue ... Fix this by updating a regexp to also recognize __clone3. Tested on x86_64-linux. Tested-By: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2024-06-20Handle "info symbol" in Rust language modeTom Tromey1-0/+3
When I changed the Rust parser to handle 128-bit ints, this inadvertently broke some other gdb commands. For example, "info symbol 0xffffffffffffffff" now fails, because the resulting value is 128 bits, but this is rejected by extract_integer. This patch fixes the problem by changing extract_integer to allow over-long integers as long as the high bytes are either 0, or (for signed types) 0xff. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 38. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31565 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-06-20[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.python/py-format-address.exp on armTom de Vries1-2/+18
When running test-case gdb.python/py-format-address.exp on arm-linux, I get: ... (gdb) python print("Got: " + gdb.format_address(0x103dd))^M Got: 0x103dd <main at py-format-address.c:30>^M (gdb) FAIL: $exp: symbol_filename=on: gdb.format_address, \ result should have an offset ... What is expected here is: ... Got: 0x103dd <main+1 at py-format-address.c:30>^M ... Main starts at main_addr: ... (gdb) print /x &main^M $1 = 0x103dc^M ... and we obtained next_addr 0x103dd by adding 1 to it: ... set next_addr [format 0x%x [expr $main_addr + 1]] ... Adding 1 to $main_addr results in an address for a thumb function starting at address 0x103dc, which is incorrect because main is an arm function (because I'm running with target board unix/-marm). At some point during the call to format_addr, arm_addr_bits_remove removes the thumb bit, which causes the +1 offset to be dropped, causing the FAIL. Fix this by using the address of the breakpoint on main, provided it's not at the very start of main. Tested on arm-linux. PR testsuite/31452 Bug: https://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31452
2024-06-20[gdb/testsuite] Fix duplicates in gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.expTom de Vries1-1/+1
When running test-case gdb.base/watchpoint-unaligned.exp on ppc64le-linux, we get: ... XFAIL: $exp: rwatch data.u.size1[3] (PRMS breakpoints/23131) XFAIL: $exp: rwatch data.u.size1[4] (PRMS breakpoints/23131) ... UNTESTED: $exp: wpcount(4) XFAIL: $exp: rwatch data.u.size1[3] (PRMS breakpoints/23131) DUPLICATE: $exp: rwatch data.u.size1[3] (PRMS breakpoints/23131) XFAIL: $exp: rwatch data.u.size1[4] (PRMS breakpoints/23131) DUPLICATE: $exp: rwatch data.u.size1[4] (PRMS breakpoints/23131) ... UNTESTED: $exp: wpcount(7) ... Fix this by using foreach_with_prefix. Tested on ppc64le-linux.
2024-06-20[gdb/testsuite] Fix duplicates in gdb.opt/inline-cmds.expTom de Vries1-12/+12
With test-case gdb.opt/inline-cmds.exp on ppc64le-linux, I ran into: ... PASS: gdb.opt/inline-cmds.exp: finish from marker ... PASS: gdb.opt/inline-cmds.exp: finish from marker DUPLICATE: gdb.opt/inline-cmds.exp: finish from marker ... Fix this by issuing less passes. Tested on ppc64le-linux.
2024-06-20[gdb/testsuite] Fix duplicates in gdb.fortran/huge.expTom de Vries1-2/+4
With test-case gdb.fortran/huge.exp, on a system without fortran compiler, I ran into a number of duplicates: ... Running /home/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/huge.exp ... gdb compile failed, default_target_compile: Can't find gfortran. UNTESTED: gdb.fortran/huge.exp: huge.exp ... gdb compile failed, default_target_compile: Can't find gfortran. UNTESTED: gdb.fortran/huge.exp: huge.exp DUPLICATE: gdb.fortran/huge.exp: huge.exp UNSUPPORTED: gdb.fortran/huge.exp: require failed: expr $compilation_succeeded ... Fix this by wrapping the compile in a with_test_prefix, getting us instead: ... gdb compile failed, default_target_compile: Can't find gfortran. UNTESTED: gdb.fortran/huge.exp: CRASH_GDB=2097152: huge.exp ... gdb compile failed, default_target_compile: Can't find gfortran. UNTESTED: gdb.fortran/huge.exp: CRASH_GDB=16: huge.exp UNSUPPORTED: gdb.fortran/huge.exp: require failed: expr $compilation_succeeded ... Tested on x86_64-linux.
2024-06-19[gdb/symtab] Fix target type of complex long double on armTom de Vries1-0/+244
When running test-case gdb.base/complex-parts.exp on arm-linux, I get: ... (gdb) p $_cimag (z3)^M $6 = 6.5^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/complex-parts.exp: long double imaginary: p $_cimag (z3) ptype $^M type = double^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/complex-parts.exp: long double imaginary: ptype $ ... Given that z3 is a complex long double, the test-case expects the type of the imaginary part of z3 to be long double, but it's double instead. This is due to the fact that the dwarf info doesn't specify an explicit target type: ... <5b> DW_AT_name : z3 <60> DW_AT_type : <0xa4> ... <1><a4>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_base_type) <a5> DW_AT_byte_size : 16 <a6> DW_AT_encoding : 3 (complex float) <a7> DW_AT_name : complex long double ... and consequently we're guessing in dwarf2_init_complex_target_type based on the size: ... case 64: tt = builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_double; break; case 96: /* The x86-32 ABI specifies 96-bit long double. */ case 128: tt = builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_long_double; break; ... For arm-linux, complex long double is 16 bytes, so the target type is assumed to be 8 bytes, which is handled by the "case 64", which gets us double instead of long double. Fix this by searching for "long" in the name_hint parameter, and using long double instead. Note that base types in dwarf are not allowed to contain references to other types, and the complex types are base types, so the missing explicit target type is standard-conformant. A gcc PR was filed to add this as a dwarf extension ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115272 ). Tested on arm-linux.
2024-06-19[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/shortpiece.exp on s390xTom de Vries1-1/+3
On s390x-linux, I run into: ... (gdb) p (short []) s1^M $3 = {0, 1, 0, <optimized out>}^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/shortpiece.exp: p (short []) s1 ... while this is expected: ... (gdb) p (short []) s1^M $3 = {1, 0, 0, <optimized out>}^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.dwarf2/shortpiece.exp: p (short []) s1 ... The type of s1 is: ... (gdb) ptype s1 type = struct S { myint a; myushort b; } ... so the difference is due the fact that viewing an int as two shorts gives different results depending on the endianness. Fix this by allowing both results. Tested on x86_64-linux and s390x-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-19[gdb/testsuite] Add string cat for tcl version < 8.6.2Tom de Vries2-7/+45
I noticed that we started using "string cat", which has been available since tcl version 8.6.2. Add a local implementation for use with older tcl versions. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-06-17[gdb/testsuite] Fix duplicates in gdb.fortran/array-{indices,repeat}.expTom de Vries2-28/+40
When running test-case gdb.fortran/array-indices.exp on a system without fortran compiler, I run into a duplicate: ... Running /home/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/array-indices.exp ... gdb compile failed, default_target_compile: Can't find gfortran. UNTESTED: gdb.fortran/array-indices.exp: array-indices.exp gdb compile failed, default_target_compile: Can't find gfortran. UNTESTED: gdb.fortran/array-indices.exp: array-indices.exp DUPLICATE: gdb.fortran/array-indices.exp: array-indices.exp ... Fix this by adding a with_test_prefix at the toplevel. Likewise in gdb.fortran/array-repeat.exp. Tested on x86_64-linux. Reviewed-By: Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova <ahajkova@redhat.com>
2024-06-15[gdb/testsuite] Clean up lib/dg-add-core-file-count.shTom de Vries1-1/+1
Fix shellcheck warnings in script lib/dg-add-core-file-count.sh. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2024-06-14gdb/aarch64: prevent crash from in process agentAndrew Burgess2-0/+68
Since this commit: commit 0ee6b1c511c0e2a6793568692d2e5418cd6bc10d Date: Wed May 18 13:32:04 2022 -0700 Use aarch64_features to describe register features in target descriptions. There has been an issue with how aarch64 target descriptions are cached within gdbserver, and specifically, how this caching impacts the in process agent (IPA). The function initialize_tracepoint_ftlib (gdbserver/tracepoint.cc) is part of the IPA, this function is a constructor function, i.e. is called as part of the global initialisation process. We can't guarantee the ordering of when this function is called vs when other global state is initialised. Now initialize_tracepoint_ftlib calls initialize_tracepoint, which calls initialize_low_tracepoint, which for aarch64 calls aarch64_linux_read_description. The aarch64_linux_read_description function lives in linux-aarch64-tdesc.cc and after the above commit, depends on a std::unordered_map having been initialized. Prior to the above commit aarch64_linux_read_description used a global C style array, which obviously requires no runtime initialization. The consequence of the above is that any inferior linked with the IPA (for aarch64) will experience undefined behaviour (access to an uninitialized std::unordered_map) during startup, which for me manifests as a segfault. I propose fixing this by moving the std::unordered_map into the function body, but leaving it static. The map will now be initialized the first time the function is called, which removes the undefiend behaviour. The same problem exists for the expedited_registers global, however this global can just be made into a function local instead. The expedited_registers variable is used to build a pointer list which is then passed to init_target_desc, however init_target_desc copies the values it is given so expedited_registers does not need to live longer than its containing function. On most of the AArch64 machines I have access too tracing is not supported, and so the gdb.trace/*.exp tests that use the IPA just exit early reporting unsupported. I've added a test which links an inferior with the IPA and just starts the inferior. No tracing is performed. This exposes the current issue even on hosts that don't support tracing. After this patch the test passes.
2024-06-13[gdb/testsuite] Add gdb.base/fission-macro.expTom de Vries3-0/+129
Starting with gcc commit 80048aa13a6 ("debug/111409 - don't generate COMDAT macro sections for split DWARF"), available from release gcc 14.1 onwards, gcc produces a usable dwarf-5 32-bit .debug_macro.dwo section. Add a test-case excercising this. Tested on x86_64-linux. Tested test-case using a current gcc trunk build, and gcc 14.
2024-06-13[gdb/testsuite] Fix kfail number in gdb.base/watchpoint-running.expTom de Vries1-1/+1
Test-case gdb.base/watchpoint-running.exp reports the following kfail: ... KFAIL: $exp: all-stop: software: watchpoint hit (timeout) (PRMS: gdb/111111) ... but the referenced gdb PR doesn't exist. Fix this by using an actual PR. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833
2024-06-12[gdb/testsuite] Fix error in gdb.server/server-kill-python.expTom de Vries1-0/+6
With test-case gdb.server/server-kill-python.exp, I sometimes run into: ... builtin_spawn gdb -nw -nx -q -iex set height 0 -iex set width 0 \ -data-directory data-directory^M kill^M (gdb) kill^M file server-kill-python^M The program is not being run.^M (gdb) ERROR: Couldn't load server-kill-python into GDB. ... The problem is that the spawn produces a prompt, but it's not explicitly consumed. This is a regression since commit 0f077fcae0f ("[gdb/testsuite] Simplify gdb.server/server-kill-python.exp"). Fix this by consuming the initial prompt. PR testsuite/31819 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31819 Fixes: 0f077fcae0f ("[gdb/testsuite] Simplify gdb.server/server-kill-python.exp"
2024-06-12Allow calling of user-defined function call operatorsHannes Domani2-0/+32
Currently it's not possible to call user-defined function call operators, at least not without specifying operator() directly: ``` (gdb) l 1 1 struct S { 2 int operator() (int x) { return x + 5; } 3 }; 4 5 int main () { 6 S s; 7 8 return s(23); 9 } (gdb) p s(10) Invalid data type for function to be called. (gdb) p s.operator()(10) $1 = 15 ``` This now looks if an user-defined call operator is available when trying to 'call' a struct value, and calls it instead, making this possible: ``` (gdb) p s(10) $1 = 15 ``` The change in operation::evaluate_funcall is to make sure the type fields are only used for function types, only they use them as the argument types. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12213 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-11gdb: warn of slow remote file reading only after a successful openAndrew Burgess2-0/+141
While working on a later patch in this series, I noticed that GDB would print the message: Reading /path/to/file from remote target... Even when /path/to/file doesn't exist on the remote target. GDB does indeed try to open /path/to/file, but I'm not sure we really need to tell the user unless we actually manage to open the file, and plan to read content from it. If we consider how GDB probes for separate debug files, we can attempt to open multiple possible files, most of them will not exist. When we are native debugging we don't bother telling the user about each file we're checking for, we just announce any file we finally use. I think it makes sense to do a similar thing for remote files. So, in remote_target::remote_hostio_open(), I'd like to move the block of code that prints the above message to after the open call has been made, and we should only print the message if the open succeeds. Now GDB only tells the user about files that we actually open and read from the remote. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-11Fix cast types for openclHannes Domani1-3/+5
The bitshift tests for opencl have these failures: print /x (signed char) 0x0f << 8 No type named signed char. (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bitshift.exp: lang=opencl: 8-bit, promoted: print /x (signed char) 0x0f << 8 print (signed char) 0x0f << 8 No type named signed char. (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bitshift.exp: lang=opencl: 8-bit, promoted: print (signed char) 0x0f << 8 Apparently opencl doesn't have the 'signed' modifier for types, only the 'unsigned' modifier. Even 'char' is guaranteed to be signed if no modifier is used, so this changes the casts to match this logic. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-11Fix 64-bit shifts where long only has 32-bit sizeHannes Domani1-0/+12
On systems where long has 32-bit size you get these failures: print 1 << (unsigned long long) 0xffffffffffffffff Cannot export value 18446744073709551615 as 32-bits unsigned integer (must be between 0 and 4294967295) (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bitshift.exp: lang=c: max-uint64: print 1 << (unsigned long long) 0xffffffffffffffff print 1 >> (unsigned long long) 0xffffffffffffffff Cannot export value 18446744073709551615 as 32-bits unsigned integer (must be between 0 and 4294967295) (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bitshift.exp: lang=c: max-uint64: print 1 >> (unsigned long long) 0xffffffffffffffff print -1 << (unsigned long long) 0xffffffffffffffff Cannot export value 18446744073709551615 as 32-bits unsigned integer (must be between 0 and 4294967295) (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bitshift.exp: lang=c: max-uint64: print -1 << (unsigned long long) 0xffffffffffffffff print -1 >> (unsigned long long) 0xffffffffffffffff Cannot export value 18446744073709551615 as 32-bits unsigned integer (must be between 0 and 4294967295) (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bitshift.exp: lang=c: max-uint64: print -1 >> (unsigned long long) 0xffffffffffffffff Fixed by changing the number-of-bits variable to ULONGEST. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-11Fix too-large or negative right shift of negative numbersHannes Domani1-0/+1
As seen in these test failures: print -1 >> -1 warning: right shift count is negative $N = 0 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bitshift.exp: lang=c: neg lhs/rhs: print -1 >> -1 print -4 >> -2 warning: right shift count is negative $N = 0 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bitshift.exp: lang=c: neg lhs/rhs: print -4 >> -2 Fixed by restoring the logic from before the switch to gmp. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-11Fix right shift of negative numbersHannes Domani1-0/+2
PR31590 shows that right shift of negative numbers doesn't work correctly since GDB 14: (gdb) p (-3) >> 1 $1 = -1 GDB 13 and earlier returned the correct value -2. And there actually is one test that shows the failure: print -1 >> 1 $84 = 0 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/bitshift.exp: lang=asm: rsh neg lhs: print -1 >> 1 The problem was introduced with the change to gmp functions in commit 303a881f87. It's wrong because gdb_mpz::operator>> uses mpz_tdif_q_2exp, which always rounds toward zero, and the gmp docu says this: For positive n both mpz_fdiv_q_2exp and mpz_tdiv_q_2exp are simple bitwise right shifts. For negative n, mpz_fdiv_q_2exp is effectively an arithmetic right shift treating n as two's complement the same as the bitwise logical functions do, whereas mpz_tdiv_q_2exp effectively treats n as sign and magnitude. So this changes mpz_tdiv_q_2exp to mpz_fdiv_q_2exp, since it does right shifts for both positive and negative numbers. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31590 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-11Restore bitshift.exp testsHannes Domani1-1/+1
Commit cdd4206647 unintentionally disabled all tests of bitshift.exp, so it actually just does this: Running /c/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bitshift.exp ... PASS: gdb.base/bitshift.exp: complete set language === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 1 It changed the 'continue' of unsupported languages to 'return', and since ada is the first language and is unsupported, no tests were run. This changes it back to 'continue', and the following patches fix the regressions that were introduced since then unnoticed. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-10[gdb/python] Fix gdb.python/py-disasm.exp on arm-linuxTom de Vries2-2/+2
After fixing test-case gdb.python/py-disasm.exp to recognize the arm nop: ... nop {0} ... we run into: ... disassemble test^M Dump of assembler code for function test:^M 0x004004d8 <+0>: push {r11} @ (str r11, [sp, #-4]!)^M 0x004004dc <+4>: add r11, sp, #0^M 0x004004e0 <+8>: nop {0}^M => 0x004004e4 <+12>: Python Exception <class 'ValueError'>: Buffer \ returned from read_memory is sized 0 instead of the expected 4^M ^M unknown disassembler error (error = -1)^M (gdb) FAIL: $exp: global_disassembler=ShowInfoRepr: disassemble test ... This is caused by this code in gdbpy_disassembler::read_memory_func: ... gdbpy_ref<> result_obj (PyObject_CallMethod ((PyObject *) obj, "read_memory", "KL", len, offset)); ... where len has type "unsigned int", while "K" means "unsigned long long" [1]. Fix this by using "I" instead, meaning "unsigned int". Also, offset has type LONGEST, which is typedef'ed to int64_t, while "L" means "long long". Fix this by using type gdb_py_longest for offset, in combination with format character "GDB_PY_LL_ARG". Likewise in disasmpy_info_read_memory. Tested on arm-linux. Reviewed-By: Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova <ahajkova@redhat.com> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR python/31845 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31845 [1] https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/arg.html
2024-06-10[gdb/testsuite] Don't use set auto-solib-add offTom de Vries14-38/+9
In test-case gdb.mi/mi-var-child-f.exp, we have: ... mi_gdb_test "-gdb-set auto-solib-add off" "\\^done" mi_runto prog_array mi_gdb_test "nosharedlibrary" ".*\\^done" ... This was added to avoid a name clash between the array variable as defined in gdb.mi/array.f90 and debug info in shared libraries, and used in other places in the testsuite. The same workaround is also used to ignore symbols from shared libraries when excercising for instance a command that prints all symbols. However, this approach can cause problems for targets like arm that require symbol info for some libraries like ld.so and libc to fully function. While absense of debug info for shared libraries should be handled gracefully (which does need fixing, see PR31817), failure to do so should not result in failures in unrelated test-cases. Fix this by removing "set auto-solib-add off". This ensures that we don't run into PR31817, while the presence of nosharedlibrary still ensures that in the rest of the test-case we're not bothered by shared library symbols. Likewise in other test-cases. Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> Tested on arm-linux.
2024-06-07gdb/testsuite: Add gdb.arch/aarch64-mops-watchpoint.expThiago Jung Bauermann2-0/+145
Test behaviour of watchpoints triggered by MOPS instructions. This test is similar to gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp, but specifically for MOPS instructions rather than whatever instructions are used in the libc's implementation of memset/memcpy/memmove. There's a separate watched variable for each set of instructions so that the testcase can test whether GDB correctly identified the watchpoint that triggered in each case. Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Tested-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2024-06-07gdb/aarch64: Add record support for MOPS instructions.Thiago Jung Bauermann2-0/+264
There are two kinds of MOPS instructions: set instructions and copy instructions. Within each group there are variants with minor differences in how they read or write to memory — e.g., non-temporal read and/or write, unprivileged read and/or write and permutations of those — but they work in the same way in terms of the registers and regions of memory that they modify. The new gdb.reverse/aarch64-mops.exp testcase verifies that MOPS instructions are recorded and correctly reversed. Not all variants of the copy and set instructions are tested, since there are many and the record and replay target processes them in the same way. PR tdep/31666 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31666 Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Tested-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2024-06-07gdb/aarch64: Disable displaced single-step for MOPS instructionsThiago Jung Bauermann3-0/+270
The AArch64 MOPS (Memory Operation) instructions provide a standardised instruction sequence to perform a memset, memcpy or memmove. A sequence is always composed of three instructions: a prologue instruction, a main instruction and an epilogue instruction. As an illustration, here are the implementations of these memory operations in glibc 2.39: (gdb) disassemble/r Dump of assembler code for function __memset_mops: => 0x0000fffff7e8d780 <+0>: d503201f nop 0x0000fffff7e8d784 <+4>: aa0003e3 mov x3, x0 0x0000fffff7e8d788 <+8>: 19c10443 setp [x3]!, x2!, x1 0x0000fffff7e8d78c <+12>: 19c14443 setm [x3]!, x2!, x1 0x0000fffff7e8d790 <+16>: 19c18443 sete [x3]!, x2!, x1 0x0000fffff7e8d794 <+20>: d65f03c0 ret End of assembler dump. (gdb) disassemble/r Dump of assembler code for function __memcpy_mops: => 0x0000fffff7e8c580 <+0>: d503201f nop 0x0000fffff7e8c584 <+4>: aa0003e3 mov x3, x0 0x0000fffff7e8c588 <+8>: 19010443 cpyfp [x3]!, [x1]!, x2! 0x0000fffff7e8c58c <+12>: 19410443 cpyfm [x3]!, [x1]!, x2! 0x0000fffff7e8c590 <+16>: 19810443 cpyfe [x3]!, [x1]!, x2! 0x0000fffff7e8c594 <+20>: d65f03c0 ret End of assembler dump. (gdb) disassemble/r Dump of assembler code for function __memmove_mops: => 0x0000fffff7e8d180 <+0>: d503201f nop 0x0000fffff7e8d184 <+4>: aa0003e3 mov x3, x0 0x0000fffff7e8d188 <+8>: 1d010443 cpyp [x3]!, [x1]!, x2! 0x0000fffff7e8d18c <+12>: 1d410443 cpym [x3]!, [x1]!, x2! 0x0000fffff7e8d190 <+16>: 1d810443 cpye [x3]!, [x1]!, x2! 0x0000fffff7e8d194 <+20>: d65f03c0 ret End of assembler dump. The Arm Architecture Reference Manual says that "the prologue, main, and epilogue instructions are expected to be run in succession and to appear consecutively in memory". Therefore this patch disables displaced stepping on them. The testcase verifies that MOPS sequences are correctly single-stepped. PR tdep/31666 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31666 Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Tested-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2024-06-07[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.fortran/array-bounds.exp on armTom de Vries1-14/+31
When running test-case gdb.fortran/array-bounds.exp on arm-linux, we run into: ... (gdb) print &foo^M $1 = (PTR TO -> ( real(kind=4) (0:1) )) 0xfffef008^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.fortran/array-bounds.exp: print &foo print &bar^M $2 = (PTR TO -> ( real(kind=4) (-1:0) )) 0xfffef010^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.fortran/array-bounds.exp: print &bar ... This is due to gcc PR debug/54934. The test-case contains a kfail for this, which is only activated for x86_64/i386. Fix this by enabling the kfail for all ilp32 targets. Also: - change the kfail into an xfail, because gdb is not at fault here, and - limit the xfail to the gfortran compiler. Tested on arm-linux.
2024-06-06DAP: Handle "stepOut" request in outermost frameJohan Sternerup1-0/+11
Previously a "stepOut" request when in the outermost frame would result in a sucessful response even though gdb internally would reject the associated "finish" request, which means no stoppedEvent would ever be sent back to the client. Thus the client would believe the inferior was still running and as a consequence reject subsequent "next" and "stepIn" requests from the user. The solution is to execute the underlying finish command as a background command, i.e. `finish &`. If we're in the outermost frame an exception will be raised immediately, which we can now capture and report back to the client as success=False so then the absence of a `stopped` event is no longer a problem. We also make use of the `defer_stop_event` option to prevent a stop event from reaching the client until the response has been sent. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-05gdb/testsuite: remove trailing \r from rust_llvm_version resultAndrew Burgess1-1/+2
I noticed that the value returned by rust_llvm_version had a trailing carriage return. I don't think this is causing any problems right now, but looking at the code I don't think this was the desired behaviour. The current code runs 'rustc --version --verbose', splits the output at each '\n' and then loops over every line looking for the line that contains the LLVM version. There are two problems here. First, at the end of each captured line we have '\r\n', so when we split the lines on '\n', each of the lines will still end with a '\r' character. Second, though we loop over the lines, when we try to compare the line contents we actually compare the unsplit full output. Luckily this still finds the match, but this renders the loop over lines redundant. This commit makes two fixes: 1. I use regsub to convert all '\r\n' sequences to '\n'; now when we split on '\n' the lines will not end in '\r'. 2. Within the loop over lines block I now check the line contents rather than the unsplit full output; now we capture a value without a trailing '\r'. There's only one test (gdb.rust/simple.exp) that uses rust_llvm_version, and it doesn't care if there's a trailing '\r' or not, so this change should make no difference there. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-06-04Return global scope from DAP scopes requestTom Tromey2-4/+8
A co-worker requested that the DAP code emit a scope for global variables. It's not really practical to do this for all globals, but it seemed reasonable to do this for globals coming from the frame's compilation unit. For Ada in particular, this is convenient as it exposes package-scoped variables. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2024-06-04Memoize gdb.Block and make them hashableTom Tromey1-0/+4
In subsequent patches, it's handy if gdb.Block is hashable, so it can be stored in a set or a dictionary. However, doing this in a straightforward way is not really possible, because a block isn't truly immutable -- it can be invalidated. And, while this isn't a real problem for my use case (in DAP the maps are only used during a single stop), it seemed error-prone. This patch instead takes the approach of using the gdb.Block's own object identity to allow hashing. This seems fine because the contents don't affect the hashing. In order for this to work, though, the blocks have to be memoized -- two requests for the same block must return the same object. This also allows (actually, requires) the simplification of the rich-compare method for blocks. Reviewed-By: Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova <ahajkova@redhat.com>
2024-06-04Put "source" into DAP scopeTom Tromey1-0/+1
I noticed a FIXME comment in the DAP code about adding a "source" field to a scope. This is easy to implement; I don't know why I didn't do this originally.
2024-06-04gdb/testsuite: tests for debug lookup within the sysrootAndrew Burgess2-0/+215
Add tests for looking up debug information within the sysroot via both build-id and gnu_debuglink. I wanted to ensure that the gnu_debuglink test couldn't make use of build-ids, so I added the 'no-build-id' flag to gdb_compile. As these tests rely on setting the sysroot, if I'm running a dynamically linked executable, GDB will try to find all shared libraries within the sysroot. This would mean I'd have to figure out and copy all shared libraries the executable uses, certainly possible, but a bit of a pain. So instead, I've just compiled the test executable as a static binary. Now there are no shared library dependencies. I can now split the debug information out from the test binary, and place it within the sysroot. When GDB is started and the executable loaded, we can check that GDB is finding the debug information within the sysroot. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31804 Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>