| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start
of New Year procedure...
gdb/ChangeLog
Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
This commit applies all changes made after running the gdb/copyright.py
script.
Note that one file was flagged by the script, due to an invalid
copyright header
(gdb/unittests/basic_string_view/element_access/char/empty.cc).
As the file was copied from GCC's libstdc++-v3 testsuite, this commit
leaves this file untouched for the time being; a patch to fix the header
was sent to gcc-patches first.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files
|
|
This applies the second part of GDB's End of Year Procedure, which
updates the copyright year range in all of GDB's files.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
Marin Cermak has found various testcases (or one of them) of GDB FAIL on
ppc64.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20328
.o contained only the function descriptor address.
The DWARF as produced by Tcl Dwarf::assemble:
<1><27>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
<28> DW_AT_name : main
<2d> DW_AT_external : 1
<2e> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x1001ff98
<36> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x1002ff98
<2><3e>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_lexical_block)
Runtime info:
$2 = {<text variable, no debug info>} 0x10000674 <.main>
$3 = {void ()} 0x1001ff98 <main>
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:22:49 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Well, most of the gdb.dwarf2 test cases simply use explicitly placed labels
for the DW_AT_low_pc / DW_AT_high_pc attributes.
See e.g. dw2-unresolved-main.c:
asm (".globl cu_text_start");
asm ("cu_text_start:");
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:54:00 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Now I see I should not do that because:
lib/dwarf.exp:
proc function_range { func src } {
So I am providing this patch.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-07-13 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* gdb.dwarf2/atomic-type.exp: Use function_range for low_pc and high_pc.
* gdb.dwarf2/atomic.c (f): Rename f_end_lbl to f_label.
* gdb.dwarf2/dw2-bad-mips-linkage-name.c (f): Rename f_end_lbl to
f_label.
(g): Rename g_end_lbl to g_label.
* gdb.dwarf2/dw2-bad-mips-linkage-name.exp: Use function_range for
low_pc and high_pc.
* gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lexical-block-bare.exp: Likewise.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update year range in copyright notice of all files.
|
|
This change introduces a new function, dwarf2_string_attr(), which is
a wrapper for dwarf2_attr(). dwarf2read.c has been updated to
call dwarf2_string_attr in most instances where a string-valued
attribute is decoded to produce a string value. In most cases, it
simplifies the code; in some instances, the complexity of the code
remains unchanged.
I performed this change by looking for instances where the
result of DW_STRING was used in an assignment. Many of these
had a pattern which (roughly) looks something like this:
struct attribute *attr = NULL;
attr = dwarf2_attr (die, name, cu);
if (attr != NULL && DW_STRING (attr))
{
const char *str;
...
str = DW_STRING (attr);
... /* Use str in some fashion. */
}
Code of this form is transformed to look like this instead:
const char *str;
str = dwarf2_string_attr (die, name, cu)
if (str != NULL)
{
...
/* Use str in some fashion. */
...
}
In addition to invoking dwarf2_attr() and DW_STRING(),
dwarf2_string_attr() checks to make sure that the attribute's
`form' field matches one of DW_FORM_strp, DW_FORM_string, or
DW_FORM_GNU_strp_alt. If it does not match one of these forms,
it will return a NULL value in addition to calling complaint().
An earlier version of this patch did this type checking for one
particular instance where a string attribute was being decoded.
The situation that I was attempting to handle in that earlier patch is
this:
The Texas Instruments compiler uses the encoding for
DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name for other purposes. TI uses the encoding,
0x2007, for TI_AT_TI_end_line which, unlike DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name,
does not have a string-typed value. In this instance, GDB was attempting
to use an integer value as a string pointer, with predictable results.
(GDB would die with a segmentation fault.)
I've added a test which reproduces the problem that I was orignally
wanting to fix. It uses DW_AT_MIPS_linkage name with an associate
value which is a string, and again, where the value is a small
integer.
My test case causes GDB to segfault in an unpatched GDB. There
will be two PASSes in a patched GDB.
Unpatched GDB:
(gdb) ptype f
ERROR: Process no longer exists
UNRESOLVED: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-bad-mips-linkage-name.exp: ptype f
ERROR: Couldn't send ptype g to GDB.
UNRESOLVED: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-bad-mips-linkage-name.exp: ptype g
Patched GDB:
(gdb) ptype f
type = bool ()
(gdb) PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-bad-mips-linkage-name.exp: ptype f
ptype g
type = bool ()
(gdb) PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-bad-mips-linkage-name.exp: ptype g
I see no regressions on an x86_64 native target.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* dwarf2read.c (dwarf2_string_attr): New function.
(lookup_dwo_unit, process_psymtab_comp_unit_reader)
(dwarf2_compute_name, dwarf2_physname, find_file_and_directory)
(read_call_site_scope, namespace_name, guess_full_die_structure_name)
(anonymous_struct_prefix, prepare_one_comp_unit): Use
dwarf2_string_attr in place of dwarf2_attr and DW_STRING.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.dwarf2/dw2-bad-mips-linkage-name.c: New file.
* gdb.dwarf2/dw2-bad-mips-linkage-name.exp: New file.
|
