Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start
of New Year procedure...
gdb/ChangeLog
Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
This commit applies all changes made after running the gdb/copyright.py
script.
Note that one file was flagged by the script, due to an invalid
copyright header
(gdb/unittests/basic_string_view/element_access/char/empty.cc).
As the file was copied from GCC's libstdc++-v3 testsuite, this commit
leaves this file untouched for the time being; a patch to fix the header
was sent to gcc-patches first.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files
|
|
This applies the second part of GDB's End of Year Procedure, which
updates the copyright year range in all of GDB's files.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update year range in copyright notice of all files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update year range in copyright notice of all files.
|
|
"triplet operands"
This is the continuation of what Joel proposed on:
<https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-12/msg00977.html>
Now that I have already submitted and pushed the patch to split
i386_stap_parse_special_token into two smaller functions, it is indeed
simpler to understand this patch.
It occurs because, on x86, triplet displacement operands are allowed
(like "-4+8-20(%rbp)"), and the current parser for this expression is
buggy. It does not correctly extract the register name from the
expression, which leads to incorrect evaluation. The parser was also
being very "generous" with the expression, so I included a few more
checks to ensure that we're indeed dealing with a triplet displacement
operand.
This patch also includes testcases for the two different kind of
expressions that can be encountered on x86: the triplet displacement
(explained above) and the three-argument displacement (as in
"(%rbx,%ebx,-8)"). The tests are obviously arch-dependent and are
placed under gdb.arch/.
Message-ID: <m3mwj1j12v.fsf@redhat.com>
URL: <https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-01/msg00310.html>
gdb/
2014-02-20 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
PR tdep/16397
* i386-tdep.c (i386_stap_parse_special_token_triplet): Check if a
number comes after the + or - signs. Adjust length of register
name to be extracted.
gdb/testsuite/
2014-02-20 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
PR tdep/16397
* gdb.arch/amd64-stap-special-operands.exp: New file.
* gdb.arch/amd64-stap-three-arg-disp.S: Likewise.
* gdb.arch/amd64-stap-three-arg-disp.c: Likewise.
* gdb.arch/amd64-stap-triplet.S: Likewise.
* gdb.arch/amd64-stap-triplet.c: Likewise.
|