aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/printcmd.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-09-20Remove explanatory comments from includesTom Tromey1-3/+3
I noticed a comment by an include and remembered that I think these don't really provide much value -- sometimes they are just editorial, and sometimes they are obsolete. I think it's better to just remove them. Tested by rebuilding. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-07-07gdb: check max-value-size when reading strings for printfAndrew Burgess1-4/+35
I noticed that the printf code for strings, printf_c_string and printf_wide_c_string, don't take max-value-size into account, but do load a complete string from the inferior into a GDB buffer. As such it would be possible for an badly behaved inferior to cause GDB to try and allocate an excessively large buffer, potentially crashing GDB, or at least causing GDB to swap lots, which isn't great. We already have a setting to protect against this sort of thing, the 'max-value-size'. So this commit updates the two function mentioned above to check the max-value-size and give an error if the max-value-size is exceeded. If the max-value-size is exceeded, I chose to continue reading inferior memory to figure out how long the string actually is, we just don't store the results. The benefit of this is that when we give the user an error we can tell the user how big the string actually is, which would allow them to correctly adjust max-value-size, if that's what they choose to do. The default for max-value-size is 64k so there should be no user visible changes after this commit, unless the user was previously printing very large strings. If that is the case then the user will now need to increase max-value-size.
2023-07-07gdb: remove last alloca call from printcmd.cAndrew Burgess1-17/+13
This commit removes the last alloca call from printcmd.c. This is similar to the patches I originally posted here: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/cover.1677533215.git.aburgess@redhat.com/ However, this change was not included in that original series. The original series received push back because it was thought that replacing alloca with a C++ container type would introduce unnecessary malloc/free overhead. However, in this case we are building a string, and (at least for GCC), the std::string type has a small string optimisation, where small strings are stored on the stack. And in this case we are building what will usually be a very small string, we're just constructing a printf format specifier for a hex value, so it'll be something like '%#x' -- though it could also have a width in there too -- but still, it should normally fit within GCCs small string buffer. So, in this commit, I propose replacing the use of alloca with a std::string. This shouldn't result (normally) in any additional malloc or free calls, so should be similar in performance to the original approach. There should be no user visible differences after this commit.
2023-07-07gdb: remove two uses of alloca from printcmd.cAndrew Burgess1-27/+22
Remove a couple of uses of alloca from printcmd.c, and replace them with gdb::byte_vector. An earlier variant of this patch was proposed in this thread: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/cover.1677533215.git.aburgess@redhat.com/ however, there was push back on that thread due to it adding extra dynamic allocation, i.e. moving the memory buffers off the stack on to the heap. However, of all the patches originally proposed, I think in these two cases moving off the stack is the correct thing to do. Unlike all the other patches in the original series, where the data being read was (mostly) small in size, a register, or a couple of registers, in this case we are reading an arbitrary string from the inferior. This could be any size, and so should not be placed on the stack. So in this commit I replace the use of alloca with std::byte_vector and simplify the logic a little (I think) to take advantage of the ability of std::byte_vector to dynamically grow in size. Of course, really, we should probably be checking the max-value-size setting as we load the string to stop GDB crashing if a corrupted inferior causes GDB to try read a stupidly large amount of memory... but I'm leaving that for a follow on patch. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2023-06-07Fix gdb.base/memtag.exp failureLuis Machado1-1/+1
While running this test on an emulator, I noticed we're failing to match the output message when "memory-tag check" is issued with no arguments. That's because I coded the message using "error" and missed a period at the end. Other similar messages are issued with error_no_arg. This patch changes that call to use error_no_arg. Tested on aarch64-linux Ubuntu 20.04/22.04.
2023-05-30gdb: add support for %V to printf commandAndrew Burgess1-1/+29
This commit adds a new format for the printf and dprintf commands: '%V'. This new format takes any GDB expression and formats it as a string, just as GDB would for a 'print' command, e.g.: (gdb) print a1 $a = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20} (gdb) printf "%V\n", a1 {2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20} (gdb) It is also possible to pass the same options to %V as you might pass to the print command, e.g.: (gdb) print -elements 3 -- a1 $4 = {2, 4, 6...} (gdb) printf "%V[-elements 3]\n", a1 {2, 4, 6...} (gdb) This new feature would effectively replace an existing feature of GDB, the $_as_string builtin convenience function. However, the $_as_string function has a few problems which this new feature solves: 1. $_as_string doesn't currently work when the inferior is not running, e.g: (gdb) printf "%s", $_as_string(a1) You can't do that without a process to debug. (gdb) The reason for this is that $_as_string returns a value object with string type. When we try to print this we call value_as_address, which ends up trying to push the string into the inferior's address space. Clearly we could solve this problem, the string data exists in GDB, so there's no reason why we have to push it into the inferior, but this is an existing problem that would need solving. 2. $_as_string suffers from the fact that C degrades arrays to pointers, e.g.: (gdb) printf "%s\n", $_as_string(a1) 0x404260 <a1> (gdb) The implementation of $_as_string is passed a gdb.Value object that is a pointer, it doesn't understand that it's actually an array. Solving this would be harder than issue #1 I think. The whole array to pointer transformation is part of our expression evaluation. And in most cases this is exactly what we want. It's not clear to me how we'd (easily) tell GDB that we didn't want this reduction in _some_ cases. But I'm sure this is solvable if we really wanted to. 3. $_as_string is a gdb.Function sub-class, and as such is passed gdb.Value objects. There's no super convenient way to pass formatting options to $_as_string. By this I mean that the new %V feature supports print formatting options. Ideally, we might want to add this feature to $_as_string, we might imagine it working something like: (gdb) printf "%s\n", $_as_string(a1, elements = 3, array_indexes = True) where the first item is the value to print, while the remaining options are the print formatting options. However, this relies on Python calling syntax, which isn't something that convenience functions handle. We could possibly rely on strictly positional arguments, like: (gdb) printf "%s\n", $_as_string(a1, 3, 1) But that's clearly terrible as there's far more print formatting options, and if you needed to set the 9th option you'd need to fill in all the previous options. And right now, the only way to pass these options to a gdb.Function is to have GDB first convert them all into gdb.Value objects, which is really overkill for what we want. The new %V format solves all these problems: the string is computed and printed entirely on the GDB side, we are able to print arrays as actual arrays rather than pointers, and we can pass named format arguments. Finally, the $_as_string is sold in the manual as allowing users to print the string representation of flag enums, so given: enum flags { FLAG_A = (1 << 0), FLAG_B = (1 << 1), FLAG_C = (1 << 1) }; enum flags ff = FLAG_B; We can: (gdb) printf "%s\n", $_as_string(ff) FLAG_B This works just fine with %V too: (gdb) printf "%V\n", ff FLAG_B So all functionality of $_as_string is replaced by %V. I'm not proposing to remove $_as_string, there might be users currently depending on it, but I am proposing that we don't push $_as_string in the documentation. As %V is a feature of printf, GDB's dprintf breakpoints naturally gain access to this feature too. dprintf breakpoints can be operated in three different styles 'gdb' (use GDB's printf), 'call' (call a function in the inferior), or 'agent' (perform the dprintf on the remote). The use of '%V' will work just fine when dprintf-style is 'gdb'. When dprintf-style is 'call' the format string and arguments are passed to an inferior function (printf by default). In this case GDB doesn't prevent use of '%V', but the documentation makes it clear that support for '%V' will depend on the inferior function being called. I chose this approach because the current implementation doesn't place any restrictions on the format string when operating in 'call' style. That is, the user might already be calling a function that supports custom print format specifiers (maybe including '%V') so, I claim, it would be wrong to block use of '%V' in this case. The documentation does make it clear that users shouldn't expect this to "just work" though. When dprintf-style is 'agent' then GDB does no support the use of '%V' (right now). This is handled at the point when GDB tries to process the format string and send the dprintf command to the remote, here's an example: Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x... (gdb) dprintf call_me, "%V", a1 Dprintf 1 at 0x401152: file /tmp/hello.c, line 8. (gdb) set sysroot / (gdb) target remote | gdbserver --once - /tmp/hello.x Remote debugging using | gdbserver --once - /tmp/hello.x stdin/stdout redirected Process /tmp/hello.x created; pid = 3088822 Remote debugging using stdio Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2... (No debugging symbols found in /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2) 0x00007ffff7fd3110 in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (gdb) set dprintf-style agent (gdb) c Continuing. Unrecognized format specifier 'V' in printf Command aborted. (gdb) This is exactly how GDB would handle any other invalid format specifier, for example: Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x... (gdb) dprintf call_me, "%Q", a1 Dprintf 1 at 0x401152: file /tmp/hello.c, line 8. (gdb) set sysroot / (gdb) target remote | gdbserver --once - /tmp/hello.x Remote debugging using | gdbserver --once - /tmp/hello.x stdin/stdout redirected Process /tmp/hello.x created; pid = 3089193 Remote debugging using stdio Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2... (No debugging symbols found in /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2) 0x00007ffff7fd3110 in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (gdb) set dprintf-style agent (gdb) c Continuing. Unrecognized format specifier 'Q' in printf Command aborted. (gdb) The error message isn't the greatest, but improving that can be put off for another day I hope. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Acked-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-05-23Introduce and use parser flagsTom Tromey1-1/+4
This patch adds a new parser_flags type and changes the parser APIs to use it rather than a collection of 'int' and 'bool'. More flags will be added in subsquent patches.
2023-05-07Remove ALL_OBJFILE_OSECTIONSTom Tromey1-2/+1
This replaces ALL_OBJFILE_OSECTIONS with an iterator so that for-each can be used.
2023-05-01Remove evaluate_expressionTom Tromey1-6/+6
evaluate_expression is just a little wrapper for a method on expression. Removing it also removes a lot of ugly (IMO) calls to get().
2023-04-29gdb: Fix building with latest libc++Manoj Gupta1-1/+1
Latest libc++[1] causes transitive include to <locale> when <mutex> or <thread> header is included. This causes gdb to not build[2] since <locale> defines isupper/islower etc. functions that are explicitly macroed-out in safe-ctype.h to prevent their use. Use the suggestion from libc++ to include <locale> internally when building in C++ mode to avoid build errors. Use safe-gdb-ctype.h as the include instead of "safe-ctype.h" to keep this isolated to gdb since rest of binutils does not seem to use much C++. [1]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144331 [2]: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/277967395
2023-04-28Allow strings with printf/evalKeith Seitz1-2/+2
PR 13098 explains that if a user attempts to use a string with either `printf' (or `eval'), gdb returns an error (inferior not running): (gdb) printf "%s\n", "hello" evaluation of this expression requires the target program to be active However, the parser can certainly handle this case: (gdb) p "hello" $1 = "hello" This discrepancy occurs because printf_c_string does not handle this specific case. The passed-in value that we are attempting to print as a string is TYPE_CODE_ARRAY but it's lval type is not_lval. printf_c_string will only attempt to print a string from the value's contents when !TYPE_CODE_PTR, lval is lval_internalvar, and the value's type is considered a string type: if (value->type ()->code () != TYPE_CODE_PTR && value->lval () == lval_internalvar && c_is_string_type_p (value->type ())) { ... } Otherwise, it attempts to read the value of the string from the target's memory (which is what actually generates the "evaluation of this ..." error message).
2023-03-28Rename "raw" to "unrelocated"Tom Tromey1-1/+1
Per an earlier discussion, this patch renames the existing "raw" APIs to use the word "unrelocated" instead.
2023-03-28Use unrelocated_addr in minimal symbolsTom Tromey1-1/+1
This changes minimal symbols to use unrelocated_addr. I believe this detected a latent bug in add_pe_forwarded_sym.
2023-03-02Handle half-float in 'x' commandTom Tromey1-1/+3
Using 'x/hf' should print bytes as float16, but instead it currently prints as an integer. I tracked this down to a missing case in float_type_from_length. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30161 Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-27Catch gdb_exception_error instead of gdb_exception (in many places)Kevin Buettner1-1/+1
As described in the previous commit for this series, I became concerned that there might be instances in which a QUIT (due to either a SIGINT or SIGTERM) might not cause execution to return to the top level. In some (though very few) instances, it is okay to not propagate the exception for a Ctrl-C / SIGINT, but I don't think that it is ever okay to swallow the exception caused by a SIGTERM. Allowing that to happen would definitely be a deviation from the current behavior in which GDB exits upon receipt of a SIGTERM. I looked at all cases where an exception handler catches a gdb_exception. Handlers which did NOT need modification were those which satisifed one or more of the following conditions: 1) There is no call path to maybe_quit() in the try block. I used a static analysis tool to help make this determination. In instances where the tool didn't provide an answer of "yes, this call path can result in maybe_quit() being called", I reviewed it by hand. 2) The catch block contains a throw for conditions that it doesn't want to handle; these "not handled" conditions must include the quit exception and the new "forced quit" exception. 3) There was (also) a catch for gdb_exception_quit. Any try/catch blocks not meeting the above conditions could potentially swallow a QUIT exception. My first thought was to add catch blocks for gdb_exception_quit and then rethrow the exception. But Pedro pointed out that this can be handled without adding additional code by simply catching gdb_exception_error instead. That's what this patch series does. There are some oddball cases which needed to be handled differently, plus the extension languages, but those are handled in later patches. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26761 Tested-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Approved-by: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
2023-02-19Convert contained_in to methodTom Tromey1-3/+3
This converts contained_in to be a method of block.
2023-02-19Convert block_objfile to methodTom Tromey1-1/+1
This converts block_objfile to be a method. This was mostly written by script.
2023-02-13Rely on value_ref_ptr::operator->Tom Tromey1-2/+2
Simon pointed out some spots were doing val.get()->mumble, where val is a value_ref_ptr. These were introduced by the function-to-method script, replacing older code that passed the result of .get() to a function. Now that value.h is using methods, we can instead rely on operator->. This patch replaces all the newly-introduced instances of this. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Remove deprecated_lval_hackTom Tromey1-4/+4
This removes deprecated_lval_hack and the VALUE_LVAL macro, replacing all uses with a call to value::lval. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn record_latest_value into a methodTom Tromey1-1/+1
record_latest_value now access some internals of struct value, so turn it into a method. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn many optimized-out value functions into methodsTom Tromey1-2/+2
This turns many functions that are related to optimized-out or availability-checking to be methods of value. The static function value_entirely_covered_by_range_vector is also converted to be a private method. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn remaining value_contents functions into methodsTom Tromey1-5/+5
This turns the remaining value_contents functions -- value_contents, value_contents_all, value_contents_for_printing, and value_contents_for_printing_const -- into methods of value. It also converts the static functions require_not_optimized_out and require_available to be private methods. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn value_address and set_value_address functions into methodsTom Tromey1-6/+6
This changes the value_address and set_value_address functions to be methods of value. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn value_lazy and set_value_lazy functions into methodsTom Tromey1-1/+1
This changes the value_lazy and set_value_lazy functions to be methods of value. Much of this patch was written by script. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn value_type into methodTom Tromey1-22/+22
This changes value_type to be a method of value. Much of this patch was written by script. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-10GDB: Introduce limited array lengths while printing valuesAndrew Burgess1-0/+16
This commit introduces the idea of loading only part of an array in order to print it, what I call "limited length" arrays. The motivation behind this work is to make it possible to print slices of very large arrays, where very large means bigger than `max-value-size'. Consider this GDB session with the current GDB: (gdb) set max-value-size 100 (gdb) p large_1d_array value requires 400 bytes, which is more than max-value-size (gdb) p -elements 10 -- large_1d_array value requires 400 bytes, which is more than max-value-size notice that the request to print 10 elements still fails, even though 10 elements should be less than the max-value-size. With a patched version of GDB: (gdb) p -elements 10 -- large_1d_array $1 = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9...} So now the print has succeeded. It also has loaded `max-value-size' worth of data into value history, so the recorded value can be accessed consistently: (gdb) p -elements 10 -- $1 $2 = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9...} (gdb) p $1 $3 = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, <unavailable> <repeats 75 times>} (gdb) Accesses with other languages work similarly, although for Ada only C-style [] array element/dimension accesses use history. For both Ada and Fortran () array element/dimension accesses go straight to the inferior, bypassing the value history just as with C pointers. Co-Authored-By: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@embecosm.com>
2023-01-19GDB: Add a character string limiting optionAndrew Burgess1-4/+5
This commit splits the `set/show print elements' option into two. We retain `set/show print elements' for controlling how many elements of an array we print, but a new `set/show print characters' setting is added which is used for controlling how many characters of a string are printed. The motivation behind this change is to allow users a finer level of control over how data is printed, reflecting that, although strings can be thought of as arrays of characters, users often want to treat these two things differently. For compatibility reasons by default the `set/show print characters' option is set to `elements', which makes the limit for character strings follow the setting of the `set/show print elements' option, as it used to. Using `set print characters' with any other value makes the limit independent from the `set/show print elements' setting, however it can be restored to the default with the `set print characters elements' command at any time. A corresponding `-characters' option for the `print' command is added, with the same semantics, i.e. one can use `elements' to make a given `print' invocation follow the limit of elements, be it set with the `-elements' option also given with the same invocation or taken from the `set/show print elements' setting, for characters as well regardless of the current setting of the `set/show print characters' option. The GDB changes are all pretty straightforward, just changing references to the old 'print_max' to use a new `get_print_max_chars' helper which figures out which of the two of `print_max' and `print_max_chars' values to use. Likewise, the documentation is just updated to reference the new setting where appropriate. To make people's life easier the message shown by `show print elements' now indicates if the setting also applies to character strings: (gdb) set print characters elements (gdb) show print elements Limit on string chars or array elements to print is 200. (gdb) set print characters unlimited (gdb) show print elements Limit on array elements to print is 200. (gdb) and the help text shows the dependency as well: (gdb) help set print elements Set limit on array elements to print. "unlimited" causes there to be no limit. This setting also applies to string chars when "print characters" is set to "elements". (gdb) In the testsuite there are two minor updates, one to add `-characters' to the list of completions now shown for the `print' command, and a bare minimum pair of checks for the right handling of `set print characters' and `show print characters', copied from the corresponding checks for `set print elements' and `show print elements' respectively. Co-Authored-By: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@embecosm.com> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-01-04Use first_opcode in another spotTom Tromey1-1/+1
I found one place that could use expression::first_opcode. Reviewed-By: Lancelot Six <lancelot.six@amd.com>
2023-01-04Convert exp_uses_objfile to a method of expressionTom Tromey1-1/+1
This changes the exp_uses_objfile function to be a method of 'expression'. Reviewed-By: Lancelot Six <lancelot.six@amd.com>
2023-01-01Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script, which automated the update of the copyright year range for all source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include year 2023.
2022-12-19Use bool constants for value_print_optionsTom Tromey1-1/+1
This changes the uses of value_print_options to use 'true' and 'false' rather than integers.
2022-10-19internal_error: remove need to pass __FILE__/__LINE__Pedro Alves1-4/+2
Currently, every internal_error call must be passed __FILE__/__LINE__ explicitly, like: internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, "foo %d", var); The need to pass in explicit __FILE__/__LINE__ is there probably because the function predates widespread and portable variadic macros availability. We can use variadic macros nowadays, and in fact, we already use them in several places, including the related gdb_assert_not_reached. So this patch renames the internal_error function to something else, and then reimplements internal_error as a variadic macro that expands __FILE__/__LINE__ itself. The result is that we now should call internal_error like so: internal_error ("foo %d", var); Likewise for internal_warning. The patch adjusts all calls sites. 99% of the adjustments were done with a perl/sed script. The non-mechanical changes are in gdbsupport/errors.h, gdbsupport/gdb_assert.h, and gdb/gdbarch.py. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Change-Id: Ia6f372c11550ca876829e8fd85048f4502bdcf06
2022-10-10Change GDB to use frame_info_ptrTom Tromey1-2/+2
This changes GDB to use frame_info_ptr instead of frame_info * The substitution was done with multiple sequential `sed` commands: sed 's/^struct frame_info;/class frame_info_ptr;/' sed 's/struct frame_info \*/frame_info_ptr /g' - which left some issues in a few files, that were manually fixed. sed 's/\<frame_info \*/frame_info_ptr /g' sed 's/frame_info_ptr $/frame_info_ptr/g' - used to remove whitespace problems. The changed files were then manually checked and some 'sed' changes undone, some constructors and some gets were added, according to what made sense, and what Tromey originally did Co-Authored-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> Approved-by: Tom Tomey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-09-21gdb: remove TYPE_LENGTHSimon Marchi1-19/+19
Remove the macro, replace all uses with calls to type::length. Change-Id: Ib9bdc954576860b21190886534c99103d6a47afb
2022-06-18gdb: Add new 'print nibbles' featureEnze Li1-1/+1
Make an introduction of a new print setting that can be set by 'set print nibbles [on|off]'. The default value if OFF, which can be changed by user manually. Of course, 'show print nibbles' is also included in the patch. The new feature displays binary values by group, with four bits per group. The motivation for this work is to enhance the readability of binary values. Here's a GDB session before this patch is applied. (gdb) print var_a $1 = 1230 (gdb) print/t var_a $2 = 10011001110 With this patch applied, we can use the new print setting to display the new form of the binary values. (gdb) print var_a $1 = 1230 (gdb) print/t var_a $2 = 10011001110 (gdb) set print nibbles on (gdb) print/t var_a $3 = 0100 1100 1110 Tested on x86_64 openSUSE Tumbleweed.
2022-04-27gdb: remove BLOCK_ENTRY_PC macroSimon Marchi1-2/+2
Replace with equivalent method. Change-Id: I0e033095e7358799930775e61028b48246971a7d
2022-04-20Replace symbol_arch with symbol::archTom Tromey1-1/+1
This turns symbol_arch into a method on symbol.
2022-04-20Replace symbol_objfile with symbol::objfileTom Tromey1-1/+1
This turns symbol_objfile into a method on symbol.
2022-04-11gdb: remove minimal symbol size macrosSimon Marchi1-2/+2
Remove MSYMBOL_HAS_SIZE, MSYMBOL_SIZE and SET_MSYMBOL_SIZE, replace them with equivalent methods. Change-Id: I6ee1cf82df37e58dff52ea6568ceb4649c7d7538
2022-04-11gdb: remove MSYMBOL_TYPE macroSimon Marchi1-7/+7
Add a getter and a setter for a minimal symbol's type. Remove the corresponding macro and adjust all callers. Change-Id: I89900df5ffa5687133fe1a16b2e0d4684e67a77d
2022-04-11gdb: remove symbol value macrosSimon Marchi1-11/+11
Remove all macros related to getting and setting some symbol value: #define SYMBOL_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.ivalue #define SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol) \ #define SET_SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol, new_value) \ #define SYMBOL_VALUE_BYTES(symbol) (symbol)->value.bytes #define SYMBOL_VALUE_COMMON_BLOCK(symbol) (symbol)->value.common_block #define SYMBOL_BLOCK_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.block #define SYMBOL_VALUE_CHAIN(symbol) (symbol)->value.chain #define MSYMBOL_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.ivalue #define MSYMBOL_VALUE_RAW_ADDRESS(symbol) ((symbol)->value.address + 0) #define MSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(objfile, symbol) \ #define BMSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol) \ #define SET_MSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol, new_value) \ #define MSYMBOL_VALUE_BYTES(symbol) (symbol)->value.bytes #define MSYMBOL_BLOCK_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.block Replace them with equivalent methods on the appropriate objects. Change-Id: Iafdab3b8eefc6dc2fd895aa955bf64fafc59ed50
2022-03-31Remove dbx modeTom Tromey1-12/+0
This patch removes gdb's dbx mode. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 34.
2022-03-29Remove unnecessary calls to wrap_here and gdb_flushTom Tromey1-1/+0
Various spots in gdb currently know about the wrap buffer, and so are careful to call wrap_here to be certain that all output has been flushed. Now that the pager is just an ordinary stream, this isn't needed, and a simple call to gdb_flush is enough. Similarly, there are places where gdb prints to gdb_stderr, but first flushes gdb_stdout. stderr_file already flushes gdb_stdout, so these aren't needed.
2022-03-29Rename fprintf_symbol_filteredTom Tromey1-4/+4
fprintf_symbol_filtered is misnamed, because whether filtering happens is now up to the stream. This renames it to fprintf_symbol, which isn't a great name (the first "f" doesn't mean much and the second one is truly meaningless here), but "print_symbol" was already taken.
2022-03-29Unify gdb printf functionsTom Tromey1-155/+155
Now that filtered and unfiltered output can be treated identically, we can unify the printf family of functions. This is done under the name "gdb_printf". Most of this patch was written by script.
2022-03-29Unify gdb puts functionsTom Tromey1-13/+13
Now that filtered and unfiltered output can be treated identically, we can unify the puts family of functions. This is done under the name "gdb_puts". Most of this patch was written by script.
2022-03-29Change the pager to a ui_fileTom Tromey1-1/+1
This rewrites the output pager as a ui_file implementation. A new header is introduced to declare the pager class. The implementation remains in utils.c for the time being, because there are some static globals there that must be used by this code. (This could be cleaned up at some future date.) I went through all the text output in gdb to ensure that this change should be ok. There are a few cases: * Any existing call to printf_unfiltered is required to be avoid the pager. This is ensured directly in the implementation. * All remaining calls to the f*_unfiltered functions -- the ones that take an explicit ui_file -- either send to an unfiltered stream (e.g., gdb_stderr), which is obviously ok; or conditionally send to gdb_stdout I investigated all such calls by searching for: grep -e '\bf[a-z0-9_]*_unfiltered' *.[chyl] */*.[ch] | grep -v gdb_stdlog | grep -v gdb_stderr This yields a number of candidates to check. * The breakpoint _print_recreate family, and save_trace_state_variables. These are used for "save" commands and so are fine. * Things printing to a temporary stream. Obviously ok. * Disassembly selftests. * print_gdb_help - this is non-obvious, but ok because paging isn't yet enabled at this point during startup. * serial.c - doens't use gdb_stdout * The code in compile/. This is all printing to a file. * DWARF DIE dumping - doesn't reference gdb_stdout. * Calls to the _filtered form -- these are all clearly ok, because if they are using gdb_stdout, then filtering will still apply; and if not, then filtering never applied and still will not. Therefore, at this point, there is no longer any distinction between all the other _filtered and _unfiltered calls, and they can be unified. In this patch, take special note of the vfprintf_maybe_filtered and ui_file::vprintf change. This is one instance of the above idea, erasing the distinction between filtered and unfiltered -- in this part of the change, the "unfiltered_output" flag is never passe to cli_ui_out. Subsequent patches will go much further in this direction. Also note the can_emit_style_escape changes in ui-file.c. Checking against gdb_stdout or gdb_stderr was always a bit of a hack; and now it is no longer needed, because this is decision can be more fully delegated to the particular ui_file implementation. ui_file::can_page is removed, because this patch removed the only call to it. I think this is the main part of fixing PR cli/7234. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7234
2022-03-10Change how "print/x" displays floating-point valueTom Tromey1-7/+2
Currently, "print/x" will display a floating-point value by first casting it to an integer type. This yields weird results like: (gdb) print/x 1.5 $1 = 0x1 This has confused users multiple times -- see PR gdb/16242, where there are several dups. I've also seen some confusion from this internally at AdaCore. The manual says: 'x' Regard the bits of the value as an integer, and print the integer in hexadecimal. ... which seems more useful. So, perhaps what happened is that this was incorrectly implemented (or maybe correctly implemented and then regressed, as there don't seem to be any tests). This patch fixes the bug. There was a previous discussion where we agreed to preserve the old behavior: https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/gdb-patches/2017-06/msg00314.html However, I think it makes more sense to follow the manual. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16242
2022-02-06gdb: remove SYMBOL_IS_ARGUMENT macroSimon Marchi1-1/+1
Add a getter and a setter for whether a symbol is an argument. Remove the corresponding macro and adjust all callers. Change-Id: I71b4f0465f3dfd2ed8b9e140bd3f7d5eb8d9ee81
2022-02-06gdb: remove SYMBOL_OBJFILE_OWNED macroSimon Marchi1-1/+1
Add a getter and a setter for whether a symbol is objfile owned. Remove the corresponding macro and adjust all callers. Change-Id: Ib7ef3718d65553ae924ca04c3fd478b0f4f3147c