aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/loongarch-tdep.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-11-10Add support for ilp32 register alias.Lulu Cai1-6/+6
2023-10-11gdb: LoongArch: Handle special struct in dummy callHui Li1-16/+189
When execute the following command on LoongArch: make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs-c++.exp" there exist some failed testcases: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 5533 # of unexpected failures 367 The root cause is related with a struct containing floating-point members as function argument or return value for a dummy call. (1) Structure consists of one floating-point member within FRLEN bits wide, it is passed in an FAR if available. (2) Structure consists of two floating-point members both within FRLEN bits wide, it is passed in two FARs if available. (3) Structure consists of one integer member within GRLEN bits wide and one floating-point member within FRLEN bits wide, it is passed in a GAR and an FAR if available. Note that in the above cases, empty structure or union members are also ignored even in C++. Here is a simple test on LoongArch: loongson@bogon:~$ cat test.c #include<stdio.h> struct test { long a; double b __attribute__((aligned(16))); }; struct test val = { 88, 99.99 }; int check_arg_struct (struct test arg) { printf("arg.a = %ld\n", arg.a); printf("arg.b = %f\n", arg.b); printf("sizeof(val) = %d\n", sizeof(val)); return 1; } int main() { check_arg_struct (val); return 0; } loongson@bogon:~$ gcc -g test.c -o test loongson@bogon:~$ ./test arg.a = 88 arg.b = 99.990000 sizeof(val) = 32 Before: loongson@bogon:~$ gdb test ... (gdb) start ... Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at test.c:19 19 check_arg_struct (val); (gdb) p check_arg_struct (val) arg.a = 140737488286128 arg.b = -nan sizeof(val) = 32 $1 = 1 ... After: loongson@bogon:~$ gdb test ... (gdb) start ... Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at test.c:19 19 check_arg_struct (val); (gdb) p check_arg_struct (val) arg.a = 88 arg.b = 99.990000 sizeof(val) = 32 $1 = 1 ... With this patch, there are no failed testcases: make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs-c++.exp" === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 5900 Signed-off-by: Hui Li <lihui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2023-06-05[gdb] Fix more typosTom de Vries1-1/+1
Fix some more typos: - distinquish -> distinguish - actualy -> actually - singe -> single - frash -> frame - chid -> child - dissassembler -> disassembler - uninitalized -> uninitialized - precontidion -> precondition - regsiters -> registers - marge -> merge - sate -> state - garanteed -> guaranteed - explictly -> explicitly - prefices (nonstandard plural) -> prefixes - bondary -> boundary - formated -> formatted - ithe -> the - arrav -> array - coresponding -> corresponding - owend -> owned - fials -> fails - diasm -> disasm - ture -> true - tpye -> type There's one code change, the name of macro SIG_CODE_BONDARY_FAULT changed to SIG_CODE_BOUNDARY_FAULT. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-05-01Replace field_is_static with a methodTom Tromey1-1/+1
This changes field_is_static to be a method on struct field, and updates all the callers. Most of this patch was written by script. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 36.
2023-03-09gdb, gdbserver, gdbsupport: fix whitespace issuesSimon Marchi1-4/+4
Replace spaces with tabs in a bunch of places. Change-Id: If0f87180f1d13028dc178e5a8af7882a067868b0
2023-03-02gdb: LoongArch: Add support for static data member in structHui Li1-0/+4
As described in C++ reference [1], static data members are not part of objects of a given class type. Modified compute_struct_member () to ignore static data member so that we can get the expected result. loongson@linux:~$ cat test.c #include<stdio.h> struct struct_01 { static unsigned a; float b;}; unsigned struct_01::a = 66; struct struct_01 struct_01_val = { 99.00 }; int check_arg_struct(struct struct_01 arg) { printf("arg.a = %d\n", arg.a); printf("arg.b = %f\n", arg.b); return 0; } int main() { check_arg_struct(struct_01_val); return 0; } loongson@linux:~$ g++ -g test.c -o test++ loongson@linux:~$ gdb test++ Without this patch: ... (gdb) start ... (gdb) p check_arg_struct(struct_01_val) arg.a = 66 arg.b = 0.000000 $1 = 0 With this patch: ... (gdb) start ... (gdb) p check_arg_struct(struct_01_val) arg.a = 66 arg.b = 99.000000 $1 = 0 [1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/cpp/static-members-cpp?view=msvc-170 Signed-off-by: Hui Li <lihui@loongson.cn> Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2023-02-23gdb: LoongArch: Support reg aliases in info reg commandHui Li1-0/+21
According to LoongArch ELF ABI specification [1], support the register aliases in "info register" command. Without this patch: ``` (gdb) info reg a0 Invalid register `a0' ``` With this patch: ``` (gdb) info reg a0 a0 0x1 1 ``` [1] https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html#_register_convention Signed-off-by: Hui Li <lihui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2023-02-23gdb: LoongArch: Modify the result of the info reg commandHui Li1-0/+39
The "info register" command should only display general registers, but it shows the information of all registers in the current code, add loongarch_register_reggroup_p() so that we can get the expected result. Signed-off-by: Hui Li <lihui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2023-02-13Turn remaining value_contents functions into methodsTom Tromey1-1/+1
This turns the remaining value_contents functions -- value_contents, value_contents_all, value_contents_for_printing, and value_contents_for_printing_const -- into methods of value. It also converts the static functions require_not_optimized_out and require_available to be private methods. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn value_type into methodTom Tromey1-2/+2
This changes value_type to be a method of value. Much of this patch was written by script. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-01-05gdb: make gdbarch_alloc take ownership of the tdepSimon Marchi1-2/+4
It's currently not clear how the ownership of gdbarch_tdep objects works. In fact, nothing ever takes ownership of it. This is mostly fine because we never free gdbarch objects, and thus we never free gdbarch_tdep objects. There is an exception to that however: when initialization fails, we do free the gdbarch object that is not going to be used, and we free the tdep too. Currently, i386 and s390 do it. To make things clearer, change gdbarch_alloc so that it takes ownership of the tdep. The tdep is thus automatically freed if the gdbarch is freed. Change all gdbarch initialization functions to pass a new gdbarch_tdep object to gdbarch_alloc and then retrieve a non-owning reference from the gdbarch object. Before this patch, the xtensa architecture had a single global instance of xtensa_gdbarch_tdep. Since we need to pass a dynamically allocated gdbarch_tdep_base instance to gdbarch_alloc, remove this global instance, and dynamically allocate one as needed, like we do for all other architectures. Make the `rmap` array externally visible and rename it to the less collision-prone `xtensa_rmap` name. Change-Id: Id3d70493ef80ce4bdff701c57636f4c79ed8aea2 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-01-01Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script, which automated the update of the copyright year range for all source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include year 2023.
2022-10-19internal_error: remove need to pass __FILE__/__LINE__Pedro Alves1-2/+1
Currently, every internal_error call must be passed __FILE__/__LINE__ explicitly, like: internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, "foo %d", var); The need to pass in explicit __FILE__/__LINE__ is there probably because the function predates widespread and portable variadic macros availability. We can use variadic macros nowadays, and in fact, we already use them in several places, including the related gdb_assert_not_reached. So this patch renames the internal_error function to something else, and then reimplements internal_error as a variadic macro that expands __FILE__/__LINE__ itself. The result is that we now should call internal_error like so: internal_error ("foo %d", var); Likewise for internal_warning. The patch adjusts all calls sites. 99% of the adjustments were done with a perl/sed script. The non-mechanical changes are in gdbsupport/errors.h, gdbsupport/gdb_assert.h, and gdb/gdbarch.py. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Change-Id: Ia6f372c11550ca876829e8fd85048f4502bdcf06
2022-10-10Change GDB to use frame_info_ptrTom Tromey1-4/+4
This changes GDB to use frame_info_ptr instead of frame_info * The substitution was done with multiple sequential `sed` commands: sed 's/^struct frame_info;/class frame_info_ptr;/' sed 's/struct frame_info \*/frame_info_ptr /g' - which left some issues in a few files, that were manually fixed. sed 's/\<frame_info \*/frame_info_ptr /g' sed 's/frame_info_ptr $/frame_info_ptr/g' - used to remove whitespace problems. The changed files were then manually checked and some 'sed' changes undone, some constructors and some gets were added, according to what made sense, and what Tromey originally did Co-Authored-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> Approved-by: Tom Tomey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-09-21gdb: remove TYPE_LENGTHSimon Marchi1-3/+3
Remove the macro, replace all uses with calls to type::length. Change-Id: Ib9bdc954576860b21190886534c99103d6a47afb
2022-09-21gdb: remove TYPE_TARGET_TYPESimon Marchi1-1/+1
Remove the macro, replace all uses by calls to type::target_type. Change-Id: Ie51d3e1e22f94130176d6abd723255282bb6d1ed
2022-08-19gdb: LoongArch: Handle variadic argumentsTiezhu Yang1-29/+76
According to LoongArch ELF ABI specification [1], variadic arguments are passed in GARs in the same manner as named arguments. And after a variadic argument has been passed on the stack, all future arguments will also be passed on the stack, i.e., the last argument register may be left unused due to the aligned register pair rule. long double data tpye is passed in an aligned GAR pair, the first register in the pair is even-numbered. [1] https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-08-09gdb/gdbserver: LoongArch: Improve implementation of fcc registersFeiyang Chen1-2/+4
The current implementation of the fcc register is referenced to the user_fp_state structure of the kernel uapi [1]. struct user_fp_state { uint64_t fpr[32]; uint64_t fcc; uint32_t fcsr; }; But it is mistakenly defined as a 64-bit fputype register, resulting in a confusing output of "info register". (gdb) info register ... fcc {f = 0x0, d = 0x0} {f = 0, d = 0} ... According to "Condition Flag Register" in "LoongArch Reference Manual" [2], there are 8 condition flag registers of size 1. Use 8 registers of uint8 to make it easier for users to view the fcc register groups. (gdb) info register ... fcc0 0x1 1 fcc1 0x0 0 fcc2 0x0 0 fcc3 0x0 0 fcc4 0x0 0 fcc5 0x0 0 fcc6 0x0 0 fcc7 0x0 0 ... [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h [2] https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-Vol1-EN.html#_condition_flag_register Signed-off-by: Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-07-26gdb: LoongArch: Handle the function return valueTiezhu Yang1-14/+219
According to LoongArch ELF ABI specification [1], handle the function return value of various types. [1] https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html#_return_values Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-07-26gdb: LoongArch: Fix code style issuesTiezhu Yang1-161/+190
Fix some code style issues suggested by Tom Tromey and Andrew Burgess, thank you. (1) Put an introductory comment to explain the purpose for some functions. (2) Modify the the attribute code to make it portable. (3) Remove globals and pass pointers to locals. (4) Remove "*" in the subsequent comment lines. (5) Put two spaces before "{" and "}". Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-07-21gdb: move the type cast into gdbarch_tdepAndrew Burgess1-2/+2
I built GDB for all targets on a x86-64/GNU-Linux system, and then (accidentally) passed GDB a RISC-V binary, and asked GDB to "run" the binary on the native target. I got this error: (gdb) show architecture The target architecture is set to "auto" (currently "i386"). (gdb) file /tmp/hello.rv32.exe Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.rv32.exe... (gdb) show architecture The target architecture is set to "auto" (currently "riscv:rv32"). (gdb) run Starting program: /tmp/hello.rv32.exe ../../src/gdb/i387-tdep.c:596: internal-error: i387_supply_fxsave: Assertion `tdep->st0_regnum >= I386_ST0_REGNUM' failed. What's going on here is this; initially the architecture is i386, this is based on the default architecture, which is set based on the native target. After loading the RISC-V executable the architecture of the current inferior is updated based on the architecture of the executable. When we "run", GDB does a fork & exec, with the inferior being controlled through ptrace. GDB sees an initial stop from the inferior as soon as the inferior comes to life. In response to this stop GDB ends up calling save_stop_reason (linux-nat.c), which ends up trying to read register from the inferior, to do this we end up calling target_ops::fetch_registers, which, for the x86-64 native target, calls amd64_linux_nat_target::fetch_registers. After this I eventually end up in i387_supply_fxsave, different x86 based targets will end in different functions to fetch registers, but it doesn't really matter which function we end up in, the problem is this line, which is repeated in many places: i386_gdbarch_tdep *tdep = (i386_gdbarch_tdep *) gdbarch_tdep (arch); The problem here is that the ARCH in this line comes from the current inferior, which, as we discussed above, will be a RISC-V gdbarch, the tdep field will actually be of type riscv_gdbarch_tdep, not i386_gdbarch_tdep. After this cast we are relying on undefined behaviour, in my case I happen to trigger an assert, but this might not always be the case. The thing I tried that exposed this problem was of course, trying to start an executable of the wrong architecture on a native target. I don't think that the correct solution for this problem is to detect, at the point of cast, that the gdbarch_tdep object is of the wrong type, but, I did wonder, is there a way that we could protect ourselves from incorrectly casting the gdbarch_tdep object? I think that there is something we can do here, and this commit is the first step in that direction, though no actual check is added by this commit. This commit can be split into two parts: (1) In gdbarch.h and arch-utils.c. In these files I have modified gdbarch_tdep (the function) so that it now takes a template argument, like this: template<typename TDepType> static inline TDepType * gdbarch_tdep (struct gdbarch *gdbarch) { struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep_1 (gdbarch); return static_cast<TDepType *> (tdep); } After this change we are no better protected, but the cast is now done within the gdbarch_tdep function rather than at the call sites, this leads to the second, much larger change in this commit, (2) Everywhere gdbarch_tdep is called, we make changes like this: - i386_gdbarch_tdep *tdep = (i386_gdbarch_tdep *) gdbarch_tdep (arch); + i386_gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep<i386_gdbarch_tdep> (arch); There should be no functional change after this commit. In the next commit I will build on this change to add an assertion in gdbarch_tdep that checks we are casting to the correct type.
2022-07-12gdb: LoongArch: Add floating-point supportTiezhu Yang1-14/+52
This commit adds floating-point support for LoongArch gdb. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-07-07gdb: LoongArch: Fix typos in code commentsTiezhu Yang1-15/+15
"it’s" should be "it's". Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-07-07gdb: LoongArch: Implement the push_dummy_call gdbarch methodTiezhu Yang1-0/+596
According to "Procedure Calling Convention" in "LoongArch ELF ABI specification" [1], implement the push_dummy_call gdbarch method as clear as possible. [1] https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html#_procedure_calling_convention Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-07-05gdb: LoongArch: add orig_a0 into register setXi Ruoyao1-0/+1
The basic support for LoongArch has been merged into the upstream Linux kernel since 5.19-rc1 on June 5, 2022. This commit adds orig_a0 which is added into struct user_pt_regs [1] to match the upstream kernel, and then the upstream GDB will work with the upstream kernel. Note that orig_a0 was added into struct user_pt_regs in the development cycle for merging LoongArch port into the upstream Linux kernel, so earlier kernels (notably, the product kernel with version 4.19 used in distros like UOS and Loongnix) don't have it. Inspect arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h in the kernel tree to make sure. To build upstream GDB for a kernel lacking orig_a0, it's necessary to revert this commit locally. [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h#n24 Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-06-25gdb: LoongArch: Implement loongarch_linux_syscall_next_pc()Tiezhu Yang1-0/+7
When FRAME is at a syscall instruction, return the PC of the next instruction to be executed. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-06-25gdb: LoongArch: Define register numbers and clean up codeTiezhu Yang1-33/+18
This commit defines register numbers of various important registers, we can use them directly in the related code, and also clean up some code to make them more clear and readable. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-06-13gdb: LoongArch: Deal with atomic sequenceTiezhu Yang1-14/+113
We can't put a breakpoint in the middle of a ll/sc atomic sequence, so look for the end of the sequence and put the breakpoint there. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-06-02gdb: LoongArch: Implement the software_single_step gdbarch methodTiezhu Yang1-0/+105
When execute the following command on LoongArch: make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/branch-to-self.exp" there exist the following failed testcases: FAIL: gdb.base/branch-to-self.exp: single-step: si (timeout) FAIL: gdb.base/branch-to-self.exp: break-cond: side=host: continue to breakpoint: continue to break (timeout) FAIL: gdb.base/branch-to-self.exp: break-cond: side=host: p counter (timeout) Implement the software_single_step gdbarch method to decode the current branch instruction and determine the address of the next instruction on LoongArch to fix the above failed testcases. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-05-10gdb: LoongArch: Use GDB style to check readbuf and writebufTiezhu Yang1-2/+2
The GDB style is to write 'if (readbuf != nullptr)', and the same for writebuf. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-05-09gdb: LoongArch: Implement the return_value gdbarch methodTiezhu Yang1-0/+33
When execute the following command on LoongArch: make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/async.exp" there exist the following failed testcases: FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: finish& (timeout) FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: jump& (timeout) FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: until& (timeout) FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: set exec-done-display off (GDB internal error) we can see the following messages in gdb/testsuite/gdb.log: finish& Run till exit from #0 foo () at /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/async.c:9 (gdb) /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/gdbarch.c:2646: internal-error: gdbarch_return_value: Assertion `gdbarch->return_value != NULL' failed. A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable. In order to fix the above failed testcases, implement the return_value gdbarch method on LoongArch. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-04-20gdb: LoongArch: Implement loongarch_scan_prologue()Tiezhu Yang1-1/+131
If can't determine prologue from the symbol table, need to examine instructions. Implement loongarch_scan_prologue() to analyze the function prologue from START_PC to LIMIT_PC, return the address of the first instruction past the prologue. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-04-02gdb: rename floatformats_ia64_quad to floatformats_ieee_quadTiezhu Yang1-1/+1
It is better to rename floatformats_ia64_quad to floatformats_ieee_quad to reflect the reality, and then we can clean up the related code. As Tom Tromey said [1]: These files are maintained in gcc and then imported into the binutils-gdb repository, so any changes to them will have to be proposed there first. the related changes have been merged into gcc master now [2], it is time to do it for gdb. [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-March/186569.html [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=b2dff6b2d9d6 Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-03-15gdb: LoongArch: fix failed testcases in gdb.base/align-c.expTiezhu Yang1-0/+4
When execute the following command on LoongArch: make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/align-c.exp" there exist some failed testcases: ... FAIL: gdb.base/align-c.exp: print _Alignof(struct align_pair_long_double_x_float) FAIL: gdb.base/align-c.exp: print _Alignof(struct align_pair_long_double_x_double) FAIL: gdb.base/align-c.exp: print _Alignof(struct align_pair_long_double_x_long_double) ... According to LoongArch ELF ABI specification [1], set the target data types of floating-point to fix the above failed testcases. [1] https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
2022-02-11gdb: LoongArch: Add initial baremetal supportTiezhu Yang1-0/+316
This commit adds initial baremetal support for LoongArch. Signed-off-by: Zhensong Liu <liuzhensong@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Qing zhang <zhangqing@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>