aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/arm-tdep.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-06-29gdb/arm: Only stack S16..S31 when FPU registers are secureYvan Roux1-1/+8
The FPCCR.TS bit is used to identify if FPU registers are considered non-secure or secure. If they are secure, then callee saved registers (S16 to S31) are stacked on exception entry or otherwise skipped. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-27gdb/arm: Unwind Non-Secure callbacks from SecureYvan Roux1-30/+84
Without this changeset, the unwinding doesn't take into account Non-Secure to Secure stack unwinding enablement status and doesn't choose the proper SP to do the unwinding. This patch only unwinds the stack when Non-Secure to Secure unwinding is enabled, previous SP is set w/r to the current mode (Handler -> msp_s, Thread -> psp_s) and then the Secure stack is unwound. Ensure thumb bit is set in PSR when needed. Also, drop thumb bit from PC if set. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan ROUX <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-24gdb/arm: Update the value of active sp when base sp changesYvan Roux1-5/+11
For Arm Cortex-M33 with security extensions, there are 4 different stacks pointers (msp_s, msp_ns, psp_s, psp_ns). When plain "sp" is updated during unwinding of the stack, the active stack pointer of the 4 stack pointers needs to be kept in sync. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-15gdb/arm: Make sp alias for one of the other stack pointersYvan Roux1-9/+11
For Cortex-M targets, SP register is never detached from msp or psp, it always has the same value as one of them. Let GDB treat ARM_SP_REGNUM as an alias similar to what is done in hardware. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-15gdb/arm: Track msp and pspYvan Roux1-0/+18
For Arm Cortex-M33 with security extensions, there are 4 different stack pointers (msp_s, msp_ns, psp_s, psp_ns). To be compatible with earlier Cortex-M derivates, the msp and psp registers are aliases for one of the 4 real stack pointer registers. These are the combinations that exist: sp -> msp -> msp_s sp -> msp -> msp_ns sp -> psp -> psp_s sp -> psp -> psp_ns This means that when the GDB client is to show the value of "msp", the value should always be equal to either "msp_s" or "msp_ns". Same goes for "psp". To add a bit more context; GDB does not really use the register msp (or psp) internally, but they are part of the set of registers which are provided by the target.xml file. As a result, they will be part of the set of registers printed by the "info r" command. Without this particular patch, GDB will hit the assert in the bottom of arm_cache_get_sp_register function. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29121 Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-15gdb/arm: Fetch initial sp value prior to compareYvan Roux1-0/+1
For Arm Cortex-M33 with security extensions, there are 4 different stack pointers (msp_s, msp_ns, psp_s, psp_ns). In order to identify the active one, compare the values of the different stacks. The value of the initial sp register needs to be fetched to perform this comparison. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-15gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassemblerAndrew Burgess1-2/+2
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler. The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*. What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate. My solution then, is to separate out the management of the disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class, and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler. In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch information. Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing. However, rather than move this printing code into the gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is now: struct gdb_disassemble_info {}; struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {}; struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {}; In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from gdb_printing_disassembler. The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything, thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-06-09gdb/arm: Document and fix exception stack offsetsYvan Roux1-4/+61
Add a description of exception entry context stacking and fix next frame offset (at 0xA8 relative to R0 location) as well as FPU registers ones (starting at 0x68 relative to R0). Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-09gdb/arm: Simplify logic for updating addressesYvan Roux1-4/+5
Small performance improvement by fetching previous SP value only once before the loop and reuse it to avoid fetching at every iteration. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-09gdb/arm: Terminate unwinding when LR is 0xffffffffYvan Roux1-0/+11
ARMv7-M Architecture Reference "A2.3.1 Arm core registers" states that LR is set to 0xffffffff on reset. ARMv8-M Architecture Reference "B3.3 Registers" states that LR is set to 0xffffffff on warm reset if Main Extension is implemented, otherwise the value is unknown. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-02ODR warnings for "struct insn_decode_record_t"Tom Tromey1-47/+48
"struct insn_decode_record_t" is defined in multiple .c files, causing ODR warnings. This patch renames the types, and removes the use of "typedef" here -- this is a C-ism that's no longer needed. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395
2022-06-02ODR warning for "struct stack_item"Tom Tromey1-10/+11
"struct stack_item" is defined in multiple .c files, causing ODR warnings. This patch renames these types. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395
2022-06-01[arm] Don't use special treatment for PCYvan Roux1-9/+0
In an exception frame the PC register is extracted from the stack just like other base registers, so there is no need for a special treatment. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-01[arm] Add support for FPU registers in prologue unwinderYvan Roux1-1/+1
The prologue unwinder had support for FPU registers, but only to calculate the correct offset on the stack, the values were not saved. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-01[arm] d0..d15 are 64-bit each, not 32-bitYvan Roux1-4/+4
When unwinding the stack, the floating point registers d0 to d15 need to be handled as double words, not words. Only the first 8 registers have been confirmed fixed with this patch on a STM32F407-DISC0 board, but the upper 8 registers on Cortex-M33 should be handled in the same way. The test consisted of running a program compiled with float-abi=hard. In the main function, a function taking a double as an argument was called. After the function call, a hardware timer was used to trigger an interrupt. In the debug session, a breakpoint was set in the function called from main to verify the content of the registers using "info float" and another breakpoint in the interrupt handler was used to check the same registers using "info float" on frame 2 (the frame just before the dummy frame created for the signal handler in gdb). Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-06-01[arm] Cleanup: use hex for offsetsYvan Roux1-8/+9
Changed offset from decimal to hex to match architecture reference manual terminology and keep coherency with the rest of the code. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2022-05-03Add an arm-tls feature which includes the tpidruro register from CP15.John Baldwin1-5/+20
2022-04-28Remove "typedef enum ..."Tom Tromey1-4/+4
I noticed a few spots in GDB that use "typedef enum". However, in C++ this isn't as useful, as the tag is automatically entered as a typedef. This patch removes most uses of "typedef enum" -- the exceptions being in some nat-* code I can't compile, and glibc_thread_db.h, which I think is more or less a copy of some C code from elsewhere. Tested by rebuilding.
2022-04-27gdb/arm: Extend arm_m_addr_is_magic to support FNC_RETURN, add ↵Christophe Lyon1-62/+252
unwind-secure-frames command This patch makes use of the support for several stack pointers introduced by the previous patch to switch between them as needed during unwinding. It introduces a new 'unwind-secure-frames' arm command to enable/disable mode switching during unwinding. It is enabled by default. It has been tested using an STM32L5 board (with cortex-m33) and the sample applications shipped with the STM32Cube development environment: GTZC_TZSC_MPCBB_TrustZone in STM32CubeL5/Projects/NUCLEO-L552ZE-Q/Examples/GTZC. The test consisted in setting breakpoints in various places and check that the backtrace is correct: SecureFault_Callback (Non-secure mode), __gnu_cmse_nonsecure_call (before and after the vpush instruction), SecureFault_Handler (Secure mode). This implies that we tested only some parts of this patch (only MSP* were used), but remaining parts seem reasonable. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn Svensson <torbjorn.svensson@st.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com>
2022-04-27gdb/arm: Add support for multiple stack pointers on Cortex-MChristophe Lyon1-18/+243
Armv8-M architecture with Security extension features four stack pointers to handle Secure and Non-secure modes. This patch adds support to switch between them as needed during unwinding, and replaces all updates of cache->prev_sp with calls to arm_cache_set_prev_sp. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn Svensson <torbjorn.svensson@st.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com>
2022-04-27gdb/arm: Introduce arm_cache_initChristophe Lyon1-6/+27
This patch is a preparation for the rest of the series and adds two arm_cache_init helper functions. It updates every place that updates cache->saved_regs to call the helper instead. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn Svensson <torbjorn.svensson@st.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com>
2022-04-27gdb/arm: Define MSP and PSP registers for M-ProfileChristophe Lyon1-29/+51
This patch removes the hardcoded access to PSP in arm_m_exception_cache() and relies on the definition with the XML descriptions. Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com>
2022-04-27gdb/arm: Fix prologue analysis to support vpushChristophe Lyon1-0/+29
While working on adding support for Non-secure/Secure modes unwinding, I noticed that the prologue analysis lacked support for vpush, which is used for instance in the CMSE stub routine. This patch updates thumb_analyze_prologue accordingly, adding support for vpush of D-registers. Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com>
2022-04-11gdb: remove MSYMBOL_TARGET_FLAG_{1,2} macrosSimon Marchi1-2/+2
Replace with equivalent getter/setter macros. Change-Id: I1042564dd47347337374762bd64ec31b5c573ee2
2022-04-11gdb: remove symbol value macrosSimon Marchi1-3/+3
Remove all macros related to getting and setting some symbol value: #define SYMBOL_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.ivalue #define SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol) \ #define SET_SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol, new_value) \ #define SYMBOL_VALUE_BYTES(symbol) (symbol)->value.bytes #define SYMBOL_VALUE_COMMON_BLOCK(symbol) (symbol)->value.common_block #define SYMBOL_BLOCK_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.block #define SYMBOL_VALUE_CHAIN(symbol) (symbol)->value.chain #define MSYMBOL_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.ivalue #define MSYMBOL_VALUE_RAW_ADDRESS(symbol) ((symbol)->value.address + 0) #define MSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(objfile, symbol) \ #define BMSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol) \ #define SET_MSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS(symbol, new_value) \ #define MSYMBOL_VALUE_BYTES(symbol) (symbol)->value.bytes #define MSYMBOL_BLOCK_VALUE(symbol) (symbol)->value.block Replace them with equivalent methods on the appropriate objects. Change-Id: Iafdab3b8eefc6dc2fd895aa955bf64fafc59ed50
2022-04-07gdb: make gdbarch_register_reggroup_p take a const reggroup *Andrew Burgess1-1/+1
Change gdbarch_register_reggroup_p to take a 'const struct reggroup *' argument. This requires a change to the gdb/gdbarch-components.py script, regeneration of gdbarch.{c,h}, and then updates to all the architectures that implement this method. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-06Enable ARMv8.1-m PACBTI supportLuis Machado1-20/+221
This set of changes enable support for the ARMv8.1-m PACBTI extensions [1]. The goal of the PACBTI extensions is similar in scope to that of a-profile PAC/BTI (aarch64 only), but the underlying implementation is different. One important difference is that the pointer authentication code is stored in a separate register, thus we don't need to mask/unmask the return address from a function in order to produce a correct backtrace. The patch introduces the following modifications: - Extend the prologue analyser for 32-bit ARM to handle some instructions from ARMv8.1-m PACBTI: pac, aut, pacg, autg and bti. Also keep track of return address signing/authentication instructions. - Adds code to identify object file attributes that indicate the presence of ARMv8.1-m PACBTI (Tag_PAC_extension, Tag_BTI_extension, Tag_PACRET_use and Tag_BTI_use). - Adds support for DWARF pseudo-register RA_AUTH_CODE, as described in the aadwarf32 [2]. - Extends the dwarf unwinder to track the value of RA_AUTH_CODE. - Decorates backtraces with the "[PAC]" identifier when a frame has signed the return address. - Makes GDB aware of a new XML feature "org.gnu.gdb.arm.m-profile-pacbti". This feature is not included as an XML file on GDB's side because it is only supported for bare metal targets. - Additional documentation. [1] https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension [2] https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aadwarf32/aadwarf32.rst
2022-03-29Unify gdb printf functionsTom Tromey1-76/+76
Now that filtered and unfiltered output can be treated identically, we can unify the printf family of functions. This is done under the name "gdb_printf". Most of this patch was written by script.
2022-03-29Unify gdb putc functionsTom Tromey1-1/+1
Now that filtered and unfiltered output can be treated identically, we can unify the putc family of functions. This is done under the name "gdb_putc". Most of this patch was written by script.
2022-03-29Unify gdb puts functionsTom Tromey1-7/+7
Now that filtered and unfiltered output can be treated identically, we can unify the puts family of functions. This is done under the name "gdb_puts". Most of this patch was written by script.
2022-03-23Update the list of recognized m-profile TAG_CPU_ARCH_*Luis Machado1-0/+3
Check 3 additional variants previously not recognized: - TAG_CPU_ARCH_V7E_M - TAG_CPU_ARCH_V8M_BASE - TAG_CPU_ARCH_V8M_MAIN
2022-03-14[aarch64/arm] Properly extract the return value returned in memoryLuis Machado1-3/+29
When running gdb.cp/non-trivial-retval.exp, the following shows up for both aarch64-linux and armhf-linux: Breakpoint 3, f1 (i1=23, i2=100) at src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/non-trivial-retval.cc:35 35 A a; (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 f1 (i1=23, i2=100) at src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/non-trivial-retval.cc:35 main () at /src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/non-trivial-retval.cc:163 163 B b = f2 (i1, i2); Value returned is $6 = {a = -11952} (gdb) The return value should be {a = 123} instead. This happens because the backends don't extract the return value from the correct location. GDB should fetch a pointer to the memory location from X8 for aarch64 and r0 for armhf. With the patch, gdb.cp/non-trivial-retval.exp has full passes on aarch64-linux and armhf-linux on Ubuntu 20.04/18.04. The problem only shows up with the "finish" command. The "call" command works correctly and displays the correct return value. This is also related to PR gdb/28681 (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28681) and fixes FAIL's in gdb.ada/mi_var_array.exp. A new testcase is provided, and it exercises GDB's ability to "finish" a function that returns a large struct (> 16 bytes) and display the contents of this struct correctly. This has always been incorrect for these backends, but no testcase exercised this particular scenario.
2022-02-06gdb: remove COMPUNIT_PRODUCER macro, add getter/setterSimon Marchi1-3/+3
Add a getter and a setter for a compunit_symtab's producer. Remove the corresponding macro and adjust all callers. Change-Id: Ia1d6d8a0e247a08a21af23819d71e49b37d8931b
2022-01-26Fix another crash with gdb parameters in PythonTom Tromey1-0/+2
While looking into the language-capturing issue, I found another way to crash gdb using parameters from Python: (gdb) python print(gdb.parameter('endian')) (This is related to PR python/12188, though this patch isn't going to fix what that bug is really about.) The problem here is that the global variable that underlies the "endian" parameter is initialized to NULL. However, that's not a valid value for an "enum" set/show parameter. My understanding is that, in gdb, an "enum" parameter's underlying variable must have a value that is "==" (not just strcmp-equal) to one of the values coming from the enum array. This invariant is relied on in various places. I started this patch by fixing the problem with "endian". Then I added some assertions to add_setshow_enum_cmd to try to catch other problems of the same type. This patch fixes all the problems that I found. I also looked at all the calls to add_setshow_enum_cmd to ensure that they were all included in the gdb I tested. I think they are: there are no calls in nat-* files, or in remote-sim.c; and I was trying a build with all targets, Python, and Guile enabled. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12188
2022-01-05Use filtered output for gdbarch dumpTom Tromey1-32/+32
This changes gdbarch dumping to use filtered output. This seems a bit better to me, both on the principle that this is an ordinary command, and because the output can be voluminous, so it may be nice to stop in the middle.
2022-01-01Automatic Copyright Year update after running gdb/copyright.pyJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure. For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were performed by the script.
2021-12-29Use filtered output in show callbacksTom Tromey1-1/+1
"show" command callbacks, like most ordinary gdb commands, should use filtered output. I found a few that did not, so this patch changes them to use the filtered form.
2021-12-29Use correct stream for process record outputTom Tromey1-18/+22
The process record code often emits unfiltered output. In some cases, this output ought to go to gdb_stderr (but see below). In other cases, the output is guarded by a logging variable and so ought to go to gdb_stdlog. This patch makes these changes. Note that in many cases, the output to stderr is followed by a "return -1", which is how process record indicates an error. It seems to me that calling error here would be preferable, because, in many cases, that's all the caller does when it sees a -1. However, I haven't made this change. This is part of PR gdb/7233. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7233
2021-12-02(ARM/fixed-point) wrong value shown by "finish" command:Joel Brobecker1-1/+2
Consider the following Ada code: type FP1_Type is delta 0.1 range -1.0 .. +1.0; -- Ordinary FP1_Arg : FP1_Type := 0.0; function Call_FP1 (F : FP1_Type) return FP1_Type is begin FP1_Arg := F; return FP1_Arg; end Call_FP1; After having stopped inside function Call_FP1 as follow: Breakpoint 1, pck.call_fp1 (f=1) at /[...]/pck.adb:5 5 FP1_Arg := F; Returning from that function call using "finish" should show that the function return "1.0" (the same value as was passed as an argument). However, this is not the case: (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 pck.call_fp1 (f=1) [...] 9 F1 := Call_FP1 (F1); Value returned is $1 = 0 This patch enhances the extraction of the return value to know about fixed point types.
2021-11-15gdb: fix gdbarch_tdep ODR violationSimon Marchi1-51/+72
I would like to be able to use non-trivial types in gdbarch_tdep types. This is not possible at the moment (in theory), because of the one definition rule. To allow it, rename all gdbarch_tdep types to <arch>_gdbarch_tdep, and make them inherit from a gdbarch_tdep base class. The inheritance is necessary to be able to pass pointers to all these <arch>_gdbarch_tdep objects to gdbarch_alloc, which takes a pointer to gdbarch_tdep. These objects are never deleted through a base class pointer, so I didn't include a virtual destructor. In the future, if gdbarch objects deletable, I could imagine that the gdbarch_tdep objects could become owned by the gdbarch objects, and then it would become useful to have a virtual destructor (so that the gdbarch object can delete the owned gdbarch_tdep object). But that's not necessary right now. It turns out that RISC-V already has a gdbarch_tdep that is non-default-constructible, so that provides a good motivation for this change. Most changes are fairly straightforward, mostly needing to add some casts all over the place. There is however the xtensa architecture, doing its own little weird thing to define its gdbarch_tdep. I did my best to adapt it, but I can't test those changes. Change-Id: Ic001903f91ddd106bd6ca09a79dabe8df2d69f3b
2021-10-29gdb: remove TYPE_FIELD_BITPOSSimon Marchi1-1/+1
Remove TYPE_FIELD_BITPOS, replace its uses with type::field + field::loc_bitpos. Change-Id: Iccd8d5a77e5352843a837babaa6bd284162e0320
2021-10-28gdb: add add_setshow_prefix_cmdSimon Marchi1-8/+5
There's a common pattern to call add_basic_prefix_cmd and add_show_prefix_cmd to add matching set and show commands. Add the add_setshow_prefix_cmd function to factor that out and use it at a few places. Change-Id: I6e9e90a30e9efb7b255bf839cac27b85d7069cfd
2021-10-25gdb: change functions returning value contents to use gdb::array_viewSimon Marchi1-1/+1
The bug fixed by this [1] patch was caused by an out-of-bounds access to a value's content. The code gets the value's content (just a pointer) and then indexes it with a non-sensical index. This made me think of changing functions that return value contents to return array_views instead of a plain pointer. This has the advantage that when GDB is built with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG, accesses to the array_view are checked, making bugs more apparent / easier to find. This patch changes the return types of these functions, and updates callers to call .data() on the result, meaning it's not changing anything in practice. Additional work will be needed (which can be done little by little) to make callers propagate the use of array_view and reap the benefits. [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-September/182306.html Change-Id: I5151f888f169e1c36abe2cbc57620110673816f3
2021-10-11[ARM] Add support for M-profile MVE extensionSrinath Parvathaneni1-4/+136
This patch adds support for the M-profile MVE extension, which includes the following: - New M-profile XML feature m-profile-mve - MVE vector predication status and control register (VPR) - p0 pseudo register (contained in the VPR) - q0 ~ q7 pseudo vector registers - New feature bits - Documentation update Pseudo register p0 is the least significant bits of vpr and can be accessed as $p0 or displayed through $vpr. For more information about the register layout, please refer to [1]. The q0 ~ q7 registers map back to the d0 ~ d15 registers, two d registers per q register. The register dump looks like this: (gdb) info reg all r0 0x0 0 r1 0x0 0 r2 0x0 0 r3 0x0 0 r4 0x0 0 r5 0x0 0 r6 0x0 0 r7 0x0 0 r8 0x0 0 r9 0x0 0 r10 0x0 0 r11 0x0 0 r12 0x0 0 sp 0x0 0x0 <__Vectors> lr 0xffffffff -1 pc 0xd0c 0xd0c <Reset_Handler> xpsr 0x1000000 16777216 d0 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d1 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d2 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d3 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d4 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d5 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d6 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d7 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d8 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d9 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d10 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d11 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d12 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d13 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d14 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) d15 0 (raw 0x0000000000000000) fpscr 0x0 0 vpr 0x0 [ P0=0 MASK01=0 MASK23=0 ] s0 0 (raw 0x00000000) s1 0 (raw 0x00000000) s2 0 (raw 0x00000000) s3 0 (raw 0x00000000) s4 0 (raw 0x00000000) s5 0 (raw 0x00000000) s6 0 (raw 0x00000000) s7 0 (raw 0x00000000) s8 0 (raw 0x00000000) s9 0 (raw 0x00000000) s10 0 (raw 0x00000000) s11 0 (raw 0x00000000) s12 0 (raw 0x00000000) s13 0 (raw 0x00000000) s14 0 (raw 0x00000000) s15 0 (raw 0x00000000) s16 0 (raw 0x00000000) s17 0 (raw 0x00000000) s18 0 (raw 0x00000000) s19 0 (raw 0x00000000) s20 0 (raw 0x00000000) s21 0 (raw 0x00000000) s22 0 (raw 0x00000000) s23 0 (raw 0x00000000) s24 0 (raw 0x00000000) s25 0 (raw 0x00000000) s26 0 (raw 0x00000000) s27 0 (raw 0x00000000) s28 0 (raw 0x00000000) s29 0 (raw 0x00000000) s30 0 (raw 0x00000000) s31 0 (raw 0x00000000) q0 {u8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, u16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u64 = {0x0, 0x0}, f32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, f64 = {0x0, 0x0}} q1 {u8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, u16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u64 = {0x0, 0x0}, f32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, f64 = {0x0, 0x0}} q2 {u8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, u16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u64 = {0x0, 0x0}, f32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, f64 = {0x0, 0x0}} q3 {u8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, u16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u64 = {0x0, 0x0}, f32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, f64 = {0x0, 0x0}} q4 {u8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, u16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u64 = {0x0, 0x0}, f32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, f64 = {0x0, 0x0}} q5 {u8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, u16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u64 = {0x0, 0x0}, f32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, f64 = {0x0, 0x0}} q6 {u8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, u16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u64 = {0x0, 0x0}, f32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, f64 = {0x0, 0x0}} q7 {u8 = {0x0 <repeats 16 times>}, u16 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, u64 = {0x0, 0x0}, f32 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, f64 = {0x0, 0x0}} p0 0x0 0 Built and regtested with a simulator. [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/bn Co-Authored-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
2021-10-11[ARM] Refactor pseudo register numberingLuis Machado1-41/+104
The pseudo register handling for ARM uses some hardcoded constants to determine types and names. In preparation to the upcoming MVE support patch (that will add another pseudo register), this patch refactors and reorganizes things in order to simplify handling of future pseudo registers. We keep track of the first pseudo register number in a group and the number of pseudo registers in that group. Right now we only have the S and Q pseudo registers.
2021-10-11[ARM] Small refactoring of arm gdbarch initializationLuis Machado1-11/+11
This is in preparation to MVE support, where we will define another pseudo register. We need to define the pseudo register numbers *after* accounting for all the registers in the XML description, so move the call to tdesc_use_registers up. If we don't do it, GDB's register count won't consider registers contained in the XML but ignored by GDB, throwing the register numbering off.
2021-09-13[gdb/tdep] Fix exec check in gdb_print_insn_armTom de Vries1-1/+3
With a gdb build with --enable-targets=all we run into a KFAIL: ... KFAIL: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: executable loaded: maintenance selftest, \ failed none (PRMS: gdb/27891) ... due to: ... Running selftest print_one_insn.^M Self test failed: arch armv8.1-m.main: self-test failed at \ disasm-selftests.c:165^M ... The test fails because we expect disassembling of one arm insn to consume 4 bytes and produce (using verbose = true in disasm-selftests.c): ... arm mov r0, #0 ... but instead the disassembler uses thumb mode and only consumes 2 bytes and produces: ... arm movs r0, r0 ... The failure does not show up in the "no executable loaded" variant because this code in gdb_print_insn_arm isn't triggered: ... if (current_program_space->exec_bfd () != NULL) info->flags |= USER_SPECIFIED_MACHINE_TYPE; ... and consequently we do this in print_insn: ... if ((info->flags & USER_SPECIFIED_MACHINE_TYPE) == 0) info->mach = bfd_mach_arm_unknown; ... and don't set force_thumb to true in select_arm_features. The code in gdb_print_insn_arm makes the assumption that the disassembly architecture matches the exec architecture, which in this case is incorrect, because the exec architecture is x86_64, and the disassembly architecture is armv8.1-m.main. Fix that by explicitly checking it: ... if (current_program_space->exec_bfd () != NULL && (current_program_space->exec_bfd ()->arch_info == gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (gdbarch))) ... This fixes the print_one_insn failure, so remove the KFAIL. Tested on x86_64-linux. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27891
2021-06-29gdb: add names to unwinders, add debug messages when looking for unwinderSimon Marchi1-0/+5
I wrote this while debugging a problem where the expected unwinder for a frame wasn't used. It adds messages to show which unwinders are considered for a frame, why they are not selected (if an exception is thrown), and finally which unwinder is selected in the end. To be able to show a meaningful, human-readable name for the unwinders, add a "name" field to struct frame_unwind, and update all instances to include a name. Here's an example of the output: [frame] frame_unwind_find_by_frame: this_frame=0 [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "dummy" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "dwarf2 tailcall" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "inline" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "jit" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "python" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "amd64 epilogue" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "i386 epilogue" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "dwarf2" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: yes gdb/ChangeLog: * frame-unwind.h (struct frame_unwind) <name>: New. Update instances everywhere to include this field. * frame-unwind.c (frame_unwind_try_unwinder, frame_unwind_find_by_frame): Add debug messages. Change-Id: I813f17777422425f0d08b22499817b23922e8ddb
2021-06-28gdb: convert obj_section macros to methodsSimon Marchi1-8/+7
Convert these three macros to methods of obj_section. The problem fixed by the following patch is caused by an out of bound access of the objfile::section_offsets vector. Since this is deep in macros, we don't get a clear backtrace and it's difficult to debug. Changing that to methods means we can step in them and break on them. Because their implementation requires knowing about struct objfile, move struct obj_section below struct objfile in objfiles.h. The obj_section_offset was used in one place as an lvalue to set offsets, in machoread.c. Replace that with a set_offset method. Add the objfile::section_offset and objfile::set_section_offset methods to improve encapsulation (reduce other objects poking into struct objfile's internals). gdb/ChangeLog: * objfiles.h (struct obj_section): Move down. <offset, set_offset, addr, endaddr>: New. (obj_section_offset, obj_section_addr, obj_section_endaddr), replace all users to use obj_section methods. (struct objfile) <section_offset, set_section_offset>: New. Change-Id: I97e8fcae93ab2353fbdadcb4a5ec10d7949a7334
2021-06-28gdb: remove gdbarch_info_initSimon Marchi1-6/+1
While reviewing another patch, I realized that gdbarch_info_init could easily be removed in favor of initializing gdbarch_info fields directly in the struct declaration. The only odd part is the union. I don't know if it's actually important for it to be zero-initialized, but I presume it is. I added a constructor to gdbarch_info to take care of that. A proper solution would be to use std::variant. Or, these could also be separate fields, the little extra space required wouldn't matter. gdb/ChangeLog: * gdbarch.sh (struct gdbarch_info): Initialize fields, add constructor. * gdbarch.h: Re-generate. * arch-utils.h (gdbarch_info_init): Remove, delete all usages. * arch-utils.c (gdbarch_info_init): Remove. Change-Id: I7502e08fe0f278d84eef1667a072e8a97bda5ab5