| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This commit extends the breakpoint mechanism to allow for inferior
specific breakpoints (but not watchpoints in this commit).
As GDB gains better support for multiple connections, and so for
running multiple (possibly unrelated) inferiors, then it is not hard
to imagine that a user might wish to create breakpoints that apply to
any thread in a single inferior. To achieve this currently, the user
would need to create a condition possibly making use of the $_inferior
convenience variable, which, though functional, isn't the most user
friendly.
This commit adds a new 'inferior' keyword that allows for the creation
of inferior specific breakpoints.
Inferior specific breakpoints are automatically deleted when the
associated inferior is removed from GDB, this is similar to how
thread-specific breakpoints are deleted when the associated thread is
deleted.
Watchpoints are already per-program-space, which in most cases mean
watchpoints are already inferior specific. There is a small window
where inferior-specific watchpoints might make sense, which is after a
vfork, when two processes are sharing the same address space.
However, I'm leaving that as an exercise for another day. For now,
attempting to use the inferior keyword with a watchpoint will give an
error, like this:
(gdb) watch a8 inferior 1
Cannot use 'inferior' keyword with watchpoints
A final note on the implementation: currently, inferior specific
breakpoints, like thread-specific breakpoints, are inserted into every
inferior, GDB then checks once the inferior stops if we are in the
correct thread or inferior, and resumes automatically if we stopped in
the wrong thread/inferior.
An obvious optimisation here is to only insert breakpoint locations
into the specific program space (which mostly means inferior) that
contains either the inferior or thread we are interested in. This
would reduce the number times GDB has to stop and then resume again in
a multi-inferior setup.
I have a series on the mailing list[1] that implements this
optimisation for thread-specific breakpoints. Once this series has
landed I'll update that series to also handle inferior specific
breakpoints in the same way. For now, inferior specific breakpoints
are just slightly less optimal, but this is no different to
thread-specific breakpoints in a multi-inferior debug session, so I
don't see this as a huge problem.
[1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/cover.1685479504.git.aburgess@redhat.com/
|
|
Add new commands:
set debug breakpoint on|off
show debug breakpoint
This patch introduces new debugging information that prints
breakpoint location insertion and removal flow.
The debug output looks like:
~~~
(gdb) set debug breakpoint on
(gdb) disassemble main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x0000555555555129 <+0>: endbr64
0x000055555555512d <+4>: push %rbp
0x000055555555512e <+5>: mov %rsp,%rbp
=> 0x0000555555555131 <+8>: mov $0x0,%eax
0x0000555555555136 <+13>: pop %rbp
0x0000555555555137 <+14>: ret
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) break *0x0000555555555137
Breakpoint 2 at 0x555555555137: file main.c, line 4.
[breakpoint] update_global_location_list: insert_mode = UGLL_MAY_INSERT
(gdb) c
Continuing.
[breakpoint] update_global_location_list: insert_mode = UGLL_INSERT
[breakpoint] insert_bp_location: Breakpoint 2 (0x5565daddb1e0) at address 0x555555555137 in main at main.c:4
[breakpoint] insert_bp_location: Breakpoint -2 (0x5565dab51c10) at address 0x7ffff7fd37b5
[breakpoint] insert_bp_location: Breakpoint -5 (0x5565dab68f30) at address 0x7ffff7fe509e
[breakpoint] insert_bp_location: Breakpoint -7 (0x5565dab694f0) at address 0x7ffff7fe63f4
[breakpoint] remove_breakpoint_1: Breakpoint 2 (0x5565daddb1e0) at address 0x555555555137 in main at main.c:4 due to regular remove
[breakpoint] remove_breakpoint_1: Breakpoint -2 (0x5565dab51c10) at address 0x7ffff7fd37b5 due to regular remove
[breakpoint] remove_breakpoint_1: Breakpoint -5 (0x5565dab68f30) at address 0x7ffff7fe509e due to regular remove
[breakpoint] remove_breakpoint_1: Breakpoint -7 (0x5565dab694f0) at address 0x7ffff7fe63f4 due to regular remove
Breakpoint 2, 0x0000555555555137 in main () at main.c:4
4 }
~~~
Co-Authored-By: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com>
|
|
While working on an experiment, I realized that I needed the DAP
block_signals function. I figured other developers may need it as
well, so this patch moves it from DAP to the gdb module and exports
it.
I also added a new subclass of threading.Thread that ensures that
signals are blocked in the new thread.
Finally, this patch slightly rearranges the documentation so that
gdb-side threading issues and functions are all discussed in a single
node.
|
|
This adds a new objfile_for_address method to gdb.Progspace. This
makes it easy to find the objfile for a given address.
There's a related PR; and while this change would have been sufficient
for my original need, it's not clear to me whether I should close the
bug. Nevertheless I think it makes sense to at least mention it here.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19288
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
Ada 2022 adds the "target name symbol", which can be used on the right
hand side of an assignment to refer to the left hand side. This
allows for convenient updates. This patch implements this for gdb's
Ada expression parser.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
When using "list" with no arguments, GDB will first print the lines
around where the inferior is stopped, then print the next N lines until
reaching the end of file, at which point it warns the user "Line X out
of range, file Y only has X-1 lines.". This is usually desirable, but
if the user can no longer see the original line, they may have forgotten
the current line or that a list command was used at all, making GDB's
error message look cryptic. It was reported in bugzilla as PR cli/30497.
This commit improves the user experience by changing the behavior of
"list" slightly when a user passes no arguments. It now prints that the
end of the file has been reached and recommends that the user use the
command "list ." instead.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30497
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
Currently, after the user has used the list command once, there is no
self-contained way to ask GDB to print the location where the inferior is
stopped. The current best options require either using a separate
command to scope out where the inferior is stopped, or using "list *$pc"
requiring knowledge of GDB standard registers. This commit adds a way
to do that using '.' as a new argument for the 'list' command. If the
inferior isn't running, the command prints around the main function.
Because this necessitated having the inferior running and the test was
(seemingly unnecessarily) using printf in a non-essential way and it
would make the resulting log harder to read for no benefit, it was
replaced by a different statement.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
This patch implements the Ada 2022 attributes 'Enum_Val and 'Enum_Rep.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
I noticed that the printf code for strings, printf_c_string and
printf_wide_c_string, don't take max-value-size into account, but do
load a complete string from the inferior into a GDB buffer.
As such it would be possible for an badly behaved inferior to cause
GDB to try and allocate an excessively large buffer, potentially
crashing GDB, or at least causing GDB to swap lots, which isn't
great.
We already have a setting to protect against this sort of thing, the
'max-value-size'. So this commit updates the two function mentioned
above to check the max-value-size and give an error if the
max-value-size is exceeded.
If the max-value-size is exceeded, I chose to continue reading
inferior memory to figure out how long the string actually is, we just
don't store the results. The benefit of this is that when we give the
user an error we can tell the user how big the string actually is,
which would allow them to correctly adjust max-value-size, if that's
what they choose to do.
The default for max-value-size is 64k so there should be no user
visible changes after this commit, unless the user was previously
printing very large strings. If that is the case then the user will
now need to increase max-value-size.
|
|
v6:
Fix comments.
Fix copyright
Remove unnecessary test suite stuff. save_var had to stay, as it mutates
some test suite state that otherwise fails.
v5:
Did what Tom Tromey requested in v4; which can be found here: https://pi.simark.ca/gdb-patches/87pmjm0xar.fsf@tromey.com/
v4:
Doc formatting fixed.
v3:
Eli:
Updated docs & NEWS to reflect new changes. Added
a reference from the .ptid attribute of the ThreadExitedEvent
to the ptid attribute of InferiorThread. To do this,
I've added an anchor to that attribute.
Tom:
Tom requested that I should probably just emit the thread object;
I ran into two issues for this, which I could not resolve in this patch;
1 - The Thread Object (the python type) checks it's own validity
by doing a comparison of it's `thread_info* thread` to nullptr. This
means that any access of it's attributes may (probably, since we are
in "async" land) throw Python exceptions because the thread has been
removed from the thread object. Therefore I've decided in v3 of this
patch to just emit most of the same fields that gdb.InferiorThread has, namely
global_num, name, num and ptid (the 3-attribute tuple provided by
gdb.InferiorThread.ptid).
2 - A python user can hold a global reference to an exiting thread. Thus
in order to have a ThreadExit event that can provide attribute access
reliably (both as a global reference, but also inside the thread exit
handler, as we can never guarantee that it's executed _before_ the
thread_info pointer is removed from the gdbpy thread object),
the `thread_info *` thread pointer must not be null. However, this
comes at the cost of gdb.InferiorThread believing it is "valid" - which means,
that if a user holds takes a global reference to that
exiting event thread object, they can some time later do `t.switch()` at which
point GDB will 'explode' so to speak.
v2:
Fixed white space issues and NULL/nullptr stuff,
as requested by Tom Tromey.
v1:
Currently no event is emitted for a thread exit.
This adds this functionality by emitting a new gdb.ThreadExitedEvent.
It currently provides four attributes:
- global_num: The GDB assigned global thread number
- num: the per-inferior thread number
- name: name of the thread or none if not set
- ptid: the PTID of the thread, a 3-attribute tuple, identical to
InferiorThread.ptid attribute
Added info to docs & the NEWS file as well.
Added test to test suite.
Fixed formatting.
Feedback wanted and appreciated.
|
|
This adds an 'assign' method to gdb.Value. This allows for assignment
without requiring the use of parse_and_eval.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
This commit adds a new format for the printf and dprintf commands:
'%V'. This new format takes any GDB expression and formats it as a
string, just as GDB would for a 'print' command, e.g.:
(gdb) print a1
$a = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20}
(gdb) printf "%V\n", a1
{2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20}
(gdb)
It is also possible to pass the same options to %V as you might pass
to the print command, e.g.:
(gdb) print -elements 3 -- a1
$4 = {2, 4, 6...}
(gdb) printf "%V[-elements 3]\n", a1
{2, 4, 6...}
(gdb)
This new feature would effectively replace an existing feature of GDB,
the $_as_string builtin convenience function. However, the
$_as_string function has a few problems which this new feature solves:
1. $_as_string doesn't currently work when the inferior is not
running, e.g:
(gdb) printf "%s", $_as_string(a1)
You can't do that without a process to debug.
(gdb)
The reason for this is that $_as_string returns a value object with
string type. When we try to print this we call value_as_address,
which ends up trying to push the string into the inferior's address
space.
Clearly we could solve this problem, the string data exists in GDB, so
there's no reason why we have to push it into the inferior, but this
is an existing problem that would need solving.
2. $_as_string suffers from the fact that C degrades arrays to
pointers, e.g.:
(gdb) printf "%s\n", $_as_string(a1)
0x404260 <a1>
(gdb)
The implementation of $_as_string is passed a gdb.Value object that is
a pointer, it doesn't understand that it's actually an array. Solving
this would be harder than issue #1 I think. The whole array to
pointer transformation is part of our expression evaluation. And in
most cases this is exactly what we want. It's not clear to me how
we'd (easily) tell GDB that we didn't want this reduction in _some_
cases. But I'm sure this is solvable if we really wanted to.
3. $_as_string is a gdb.Function sub-class, and as such is passed
gdb.Value objects. There's no super convenient way to pass formatting
options to $_as_string. By this I mean that the new %V feature
supports print formatting options. Ideally, we might want to add this
feature to $_as_string, we might imagine it working something like:
(gdb) printf "%s\n", $_as_string(a1,
elements = 3,
array_indexes = True)
where the first item is the value to print, while the remaining
options are the print formatting options. However, this relies on
Python calling syntax, which isn't something that convenience
functions handle. We could possibly rely on strictly positional
arguments, like:
(gdb) printf "%s\n", $_as_string(a1, 3, 1)
But that's clearly terrible as there's far more print formatting
options, and if you needed to set the 9th option you'd need to fill in
all the previous options.
And right now, the only way to pass these options to a gdb.Function is
to have GDB first convert them all into gdb.Value objects, which is
really overkill for what we want.
The new %V format solves all these problems: the string is computed
and printed entirely on the GDB side, we are able to print arrays as
actual arrays rather than pointers, and we can pass named format
arguments.
Finally, the $_as_string is sold in the manual as allowing users to
print the string representation of flag enums, so given:
enum flags
{
FLAG_A = (1 << 0),
FLAG_B = (1 << 1),
FLAG_C = (1 << 1)
};
enum flags ff = FLAG_B;
We can:
(gdb) printf "%s\n", $_as_string(ff)
FLAG_B
This works just fine with %V too:
(gdb) printf "%V\n", ff
FLAG_B
So all functionality of $_as_string is replaced by %V. I'm not
proposing to remove $_as_string, there might be users currently
depending on it, but I am proposing that we don't push $_as_string in
the documentation.
As %V is a feature of printf, GDB's dprintf breakpoints naturally gain
access to this feature too. dprintf breakpoints can be operated in
three different styles 'gdb' (use GDB's printf), 'call' (call a
function in the inferior), or 'agent' (perform the dprintf on the
remote).
The use of '%V' will work just fine when dprintf-style is 'gdb'.
When dprintf-style is 'call' the format string and arguments are
passed to an inferior function (printf by default). In this case GDB
doesn't prevent use of '%V', but the documentation makes it clear that
support for '%V' will depend on the inferior function being called.
I chose this approach because the current implementation doesn't place
any restrictions on the format string when operating in 'call' style.
That is, the user might already be calling a function that supports
custom print format specifiers (maybe including '%V') so, I claim, it
would be wrong to block use of '%V' in this case. The documentation
does make it clear that users shouldn't expect this to "just work"
though.
When dprintf-style is 'agent' then GDB does no support the use of
'%V' (right now). This is handled at the point when GDB tries to
process the format string and send the dprintf command to the remote,
here's an example:
Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x...
(gdb) dprintf call_me, "%V", a1
Dprintf 1 at 0x401152: file /tmp/hello.c, line 8.
(gdb) set sysroot /
(gdb) target remote | gdbserver --once - /tmp/hello.x
Remote debugging using | gdbserver --once - /tmp/hello.x
stdin/stdout redirected
Process /tmp/hello.x created; pid = 3088822
Remote debugging using stdio
Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...
(No debugging symbols found in /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
0x00007ffff7fd3110 in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
(gdb) set dprintf-style agent
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Unrecognized format specifier 'V' in printf
Command aborted.
(gdb)
This is exactly how GDB would handle any other invalid format
specifier, for example:
Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x...
(gdb) dprintf call_me, "%Q", a1
Dprintf 1 at 0x401152: file /tmp/hello.c, line 8.
(gdb) set sysroot /
(gdb) target remote | gdbserver --once - /tmp/hello.x
Remote debugging using | gdbserver --once - /tmp/hello.x
stdin/stdout redirected
Process /tmp/hello.x created; pid = 3089193
Remote debugging using stdio
Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...
(No debugging symbols found in /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
0x00007ffff7fd3110 in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
(gdb) set dprintf-style agent
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Unrecognized format specifier 'Q' in printf
Command aborted.
(gdb)
The error message isn't the greatest, but improving that can be put
off for another day I hope.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Acked-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
|
|
This adds two new attributes and three new methods to gdb.Inferior.
The attributes let Python code see the command-line arguments and the
name of "main". Argument setting is also supported.
The methods let Python code manipulate the inferior's environment
variables.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
This adds a 'global_context' parse_and_eval to gdb.parse_and_eval.
This lets users request a parse that is done at "global scope".
I considered letting callers pass in a block instead, with None
meaning "global" -- but then there didn't seem to be a clean way to
express the default for this parameter.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
This adds a new Python function, gdb.execute_mi, that can be used to
invoke an MI command but get the output as a Python object, rather
than a string. This is done by implementing a new ui_out subclass
that builds a Python object.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11688
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
This commit extends the Python Disassembler API to allow for styling
of the instructions.
Before this commit the Python Disassembler API allowed the user to do
two things:
- They could intercept instruction disassembly requests and return a
string of their choosing, this string then became the disassembled
instruction, or
- They could call builtin_disassemble, which would call back into
libopcode to perform the disassembly. As libopcode printed the
instruction GDB would collect these print requests and build a
string. This string was then returned from the builtin_disassemble
call, and the user could modify or extend this string as needed.
Neither of these approaches allowed for, or preserved, disassembler
styling, which is now available within libopcodes for many of the more
popular architectures GDB supports.
This commit aims to fill this gap. After this commit a user will be
able to do the following things:
- Implement a custom instruction disassembler entirely in Python
without calling back into libopcodes, the custom disassembler will
be able to return styling information such that GDB will display
the instruction fully styled. All of GDB's existing style
settings will affect how instructions coming from the Python
disassembler are displayed in the expected manner.
- Call builtin_disassemble and receive a result that represents how
libopcode would like the instruction styled. The user can then
adjust or extend the disassembled instruction before returning the
result to GDB. Again, the instruction will be styled as expected.
To achieve this I will add two new classes to GDB,
DisassemblerTextPart and DisassemblerAddressPart.
Within builtin_disassemble, instead of capturing the print calls from
libopcodes and building a single string, we will now create either a
text part or address part and store these parts in a vector.
The DisassemblerTextPart will capture a small piece of text along with
the associated style that should be used to display the text. This
corresponds to the disassembler calling
disassemble_info::fprintf_styled_func, or for disassemblers that don't
support styling disassemble_info::fprintf_func.
The DisassemblerAddressPart is used when libopcodes requests that an
address be printed, and takes care of printing the address and
associated symbol, this corresponds to the disassembler calling
disassemble_info::print_address_func.
These parts are then placed within the DisassemblerResult when
builtin_disassemble returns.
Alternatively, the user can directly create parts by calling two new
methods on the DisassembleInfo class: DisassembleInfo.text_part and
DisassembleInfo.address_part.
Having created these parts the user can then pass these parts when
initializing a new DisassemblerResult object.
Finally, when we return from Python to gdbpy_print_insn, one way or
another, the result being returned will have a list of parts. Back in
GDB's C++ code we walk the list of parts and call back into GDB's core
to display the disassembled instruction with the correct styling.
The new API lives in parallel with the old API. Any existing code
that creates a DisassemblerResult using a single string immediately
creates a single DisassemblerTextPart containing the entire
instruction and gives this part the default text style. This is also
what happens if the user calls builtin_disassemble for an architecture
that doesn't (yet) support libopcode styling.
This matches up with what happens when the Python API is not involved,
an architecture without disassembler styling support uses the old
libopcodes printing API (the API that doesn't pass style info), and
GDB just prints everything using the default text style.
The reason that parts are created by calling methods on
DisassembleInfo, rather than calling the class constructor directly,
is DisassemblerAddressPart. Ideally this part would only hold the
address which the part represents, but in order to support backwards
compatibility we need to be able to convert the
DisassemblerAddressPart into a string. To do that we need to call
GDB's internal print_address function, and to do that we need an
gdbarch.
What this means is that the DisassemblerAddressPart needs to take a
gdb.Architecture object at creation time. The only valid place a user
can pull this from is from the DisassembleInfo object, so having the
DisassembleInfo act as a factory ensures that the correct gdbarch is
passed over each time. I implemented both solutions (the one
presented here, and an alternative where parts could be constructed
directly), and this felt like the cleanest solution.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
This commit is a refactor ahead of the next change which will make
disassembler styling available through the Python API.
Unfortunately, in order to make the styling support available, I think
the easiest solution is to make a very small change to the existing
API.
The current API relies on returning a DisassemblerResult object to
represent each disassembled instruction. Currently GDB allows the
DisassemblerResult class to be sub-classed, which could mean that a
user tries to override the various attributes that exist on the
DisassemblerResult object.
This commit removes this ability, effectively making the
DisassemblerResult class final.
Though this is a change to the existing API, I'm hoping this isn't
going to cause too many issues:
- The Python disassembler API was only added in the previous release
of GDB, so I don't expect it to be widely used yet, and
- It's not clear to me why a user would need to sub-class the
DisassemblerResult type, I allowed it in the original patch
because at the time I couldn't see any reason to NOT allow it.
Having prevented sub-classing I can now rework the tail end of the
gdbpy_print_insn function; instead of pulling the results out of the
DisassemblerResult object by calling back into Python, I now cast the
Python object back to its C++ type (disasm_result_object), and access
the fields directly from there. In later commits I will be reworking
the disasm_result_object type in order to hold information about the
styled disassembler output.
The tests that dealt with sub-classing DisassemblerResult have been
removed, and a new test that confirms that DisassemblerResult can't be
sub-classed has been added.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
SUMMARY
The '--simple-values' argument to '-stack-list-arguments' and similar
GDB/MI commands does not take reference types into account, so that
references to arbitrarily large structures are considered "simple" and
printed. This means that the '--simple-values' argument cannot be used
by IDEs when tracing the stack due to the time taken to print large
structures passed by reference.
DETAILS
Various GDB/MI commands ('-stack-list-arguments', '-stack-list-locals',
'-stack-list-variables' and so on) take a PRINT-VALUES argument which
may be '--no-values' (0), '--all-values' (1) or '--simple-values' (2).
In the '--simple-values' case, the command is supposed to print the
name, type, and value of variables with simple types, and print only the
name and type of variables with compound types.
The '--simple-values' argument ought to be suitable for IDEs that need
to update their user interface with the program's call stack every time
the program stops. However, it does not take C++ reference types into
account, and this makes the argument unsuitable for this purpose.
For example, consider the following C++ program:
struct s {
int v[10];
};
int
sum(const struct s &s)
{
int total = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) total += s.v[i];
return total;
}
int
main(void)
{
struct s s = { { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 } };
return sum(s);
}
If we start GDB in MI mode and continue to 'sum', the behaviour of
'-stack-list-arguments' is as follows:
(gdb)
-stack-list-arguments --simple-values
^done,stack-args=[frame={level="0",args=[{name="s",type="const s &",value="@0x7fffffffe310: {v = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}}"}]},frame={level="1",args=[]}]
Note that the value of the argument 's' was printed, even though 's' is
a reference to a structure, which is not a simple value.
See https://github.com/microsoft/MIEngine/pull/673 for a case where this
behaviour caused Microsoft to avoid the use of '--simple-values' in
their MIEngine debug adapter, because it caused Visual Studio Code to
take too long to refresh the call stack in the user interface.
SOLUTIONS
There are two ways we could fix this problem, depending on whether we
consider the current behaviour to be a bug.
1. If the current behaviour is a bug, then we can update the behaviour
of '--simple-values' so that it takes reference types into account:
that is, a value is simple if it is neither an array, struct, or
union, nor a reference to an array, struct or union.
In this case we must add a feature to the '-list-features' command so
that IDEs can detect that it is safe to use the '--simple-values'
argument when refreshing the call stack.
2. If the current behaviour is not a bug, then we can add a new option
for the PRINT-VALUES argument, for example, '--scalar-values' (3),
that would be suitable for use by IDEs.
In this case we must add a feature to the '-list-features' command
so that IDEs can detect that the '--scalar-values' argument is
available for use when refreshing the call stack.
PATCH
This patch implements solution (1) as I think the current behaviour of
not printing structures, but printing references to structures, is
contrary to reasonable expectation.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29554
|
|
I noticed the following behaviour:
$ gdb -q -i=mi /tmp/hello.x
=thread-group-added,id="i1"
=cmd-param-changed,param="print pretty",value="on"
~"Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x...\n"
(gdb)
-break-insert -p 99 main
^done,bkpt={number="1",type="breakpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",addr="0x0000000000401198",func="main",file="/tmp/hello.c",fullname="/tmp/hello.c",line="18",thread-groups=["i1"],thread="99",times="0",original-location="main"}
(gdb)
info breakpoints
&"info breakpoints\n"
~"Num Type Disp Enb Address What\n"
~"1 breakpoint keep y 0x0000000000401198 in main at /tmp/hello.c:18\n"
&"../../src/gdb/thread.c:1434: internal-error: print_thread_id: Assertion `thr != nullptr' failed.\nA problem internal to GDB has been detected,\nfurther debugging may prove unreliable."
&"\n"
&"----- Backtrace -----\n"
&"Backtrace unavailable\n"
&"---------------------\n"
&"\nThis is a bug, please report it."
&" For instructions, see:\n"
&"<https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.\n\n"
Aborted (core dumped)
What we see here is that when using the MI a user can create
thread-specific breakpoints for non-existent threads. Then if we try
to use the CLI 'info breakpoints' command GDB throws an assertion.
The assert is a result of the print_thread_id call when trying to
build the 'stop only in thread xx.yy' line; print_thread_id requires a
valid thread_info pointer, which we can't have for a non-existent
thread.
In contrast, when using the CLI we see this behaviour:
$ gdb -q /tmp/hello.x
Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x...
(gdb) break main thread 99
Unknown thread 99.
(gdb)
The CLI doesn't allow a breakpoint to be created for a non-existent
thread. So the 'info breakpoints' command is always fine.
Interestingly, the MI -break-info command doesn't crash, this is
because the MI uses global thread-ids, and so never calls
print_thread_id. However, GDB does support using CLI and MI in
parallel, so we need to solve this problem.
One option would be to change the CLI behaviour to allow printing
breakpoints for non-existent threads. This would preserve the current
MI behaviour.
The other option is to pull the MI into line with the CLI and prevent
breakpoints being created for non-existent threads. This is good for
consistency, but is a breaking change for the MI.
In the end I figured that it was probably better to retain the
consistent CLI behaviour, and just made the MI reject requests to
place a breakpoint on a non-existent thread. The only test we had
that depended on the old behaviour was
gdb.mi/mi-thread-specific-bp.exp, which was added by me in commit:
commit 2fd9a436c8d24eb0af85ccb3a2fbdf9a9c679a6c
Date: Fri Feb 17 10:48:06 2023 +0000
gdb: don't duplicate 'thread' field in MI breakpoint output
I certainly didn't intend for this test to rely on this feature of the
MI, so I propose to update this test to only create breakpoints for
threads that exist.
Actually, I've added a new test that checks the MI rejects creating a
breakpoint for a non-existent thread, and I've also extended the test
to run with the separate MI/CLI UIs, and then tested 'info
breakpoints' to ensure this command doesn't crash.
I've extended the documentation of the `-p` flag to explain the
constraints better.
I have also added a NEWS entry just in case someone runs into this
issue, at least then they'll know this change in behaviour was
intentional.
One thing that I did wonder about while writing this patch, is whether
we should treat requests like this, on both the MI and CLI, as another
form of pending breakpoint, something like:
(gdb) break foo thread 9
Thread 9 does not exist.
Make breakpoint pending on future thread creation? (y or [n]) y
Breakpoint 1 (foo thread 9) pending.
(gdb) info breakpoints
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> foo thread 9
Don't know if folk think that would be a useful idea or not? Either
way, I think that would be a separate patch from this one.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
Older gdb's (9, 10, 11 and 12) have a bug that causes them to crash whenever
a target reports the pauth feature string in the target description and also
provide additional register outside of gdb's known and expected feature
strings.
This was fixed in gdb 13 onwards, but that means we're stuck with gdb's out
there that will crash on connection to the above targets.
QEMU has postponed inclusion of the pauth feature string in version 8, and
instead we agreed to use a new feature name to prevent crashing those older
gdb's.
Initially there was a plan to backport a trivial fix all the way to gdb 9, but
given QEMU's choice, this is no longer needed.
This new feature string is org.gnu.gdb.aarch64.pauth_v2, and should be used
by all targets going forward, except native linux gdb and gdbserver, for
backwards compatibility with older gdb's/gdbserver's.
gdb/gdbserver will still emit the old feature string for Linux since it doesn't
report additional system registers and thus doesn't cause a crash of older
gdb's. We can revisit this in the future once the problematic gdb's are likely
no longer in use.
I've added some documentation to explain the situation.
|
|
Allow consumers of GDB to extract the name of the main method. This is
most useful for Fortran programs which have a variable main method.
Used by both MAP and DDT e.g. it is used to detect the presence of debug
information.
Co-Authored-By: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@embecosm.com>
|
|
When writing an unwinder it is necessary to create a new class to act
as a frame-id. This new class is almost certainly just going to set a
'sp' and 'pc' attribute within the instance.
This commit adds a little helper class gdb.unwinder.FrameId that does
this job. Users can make use of this to avoid having to write out
standard boilerplate code any time they write an unwinder.
Of course, if the user wants their FrameId class to be more
complicated in some way, then they can still write their own class,
just like they could before.
I've simplified the example code in the documentation to now use the
new helper class, and I've also made use of this helper within the
testsuite.
Any existing user code will continue to work just as it did before
after this change.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
Currently when creating a gdb.UnwindInfo object a user must call
gdb.PendingFrame.create_unwind_info and pass a frame-id object.
The frame-id object should have at least a 'sp' attribute, and
probably a 'pc' attribute too (it can also, in some cases have a
'special' attribute).
Currently all of these frame-id attributes need to be gdb.Value
objects, but the only reason for that requirement is that we have some
code in py-unwind.c that only handles gdb.Value objects.
If instead we switch to using get_addr_from_python in py-utils.c then
we will support both gdb.Value objects and also raw numbers, which
might make things simpler in some cases.
So, I started rewriting pyuw_object_attribute_to_pointer (in
py-unwind.c) to use get_addr_from_python. However, while looking at
the code I noticed a problem.
The pyuw_object_attribute_to_pointer function returns a boolean flag,
if everything goes OK we return true, but we return false in two
cases, (1) when the attribute is not present, which might be
acceptable, or might be an error, and (2) when we get an error trying
to extract the attribute value, in which case a Python error will have
been set.
Now in pending_framepy_create_unwind_info we have this code:
if (!pyuw_object_attribute_to_pointer (pyo_frame_id, "sp", &sp))
{
PyErr_SetString (PyExc_ValueError,
_("frame_id should have 'sp' attribute."));
return NULL;
}
Notice how we always set an error. This will override any error that
is already set.
So, if you create a frame-id object that has an 'sp' attribute, but
the attribute is not a gdb.Value, then currently we fail to extract
the attribute value (it's not a gdb.Value) and set this error in
pyuw_object_attribute_to_pointer:
rc = pyuw_value_obj_to_pointer (pyo_value.get (), addr);
if (!rc)
PyErr_Format (
PyExc_ValueError,
_("The value of the '%s' attribute is not a pointer."),
attr_name);
Then we return to pending_framepy_create_unwind_info and immediately
override this error with the error about 'sp' being missing.
This all feels very confused.
Here's my proposed solution: pyuw_object_attribute_to_pointer will now
return a tri-state enum, with states OK, MISSING, or ERROR. The
meanings of these states are:
OK - Attribute exists and was extracted fine,
MISSING - Attribute doesn't exist, no Python error was set.
ERROR - Attribute does exist, but there was an error while
extracting it, a Python error was set.
We need to update pending_framepy_create_unwind_info, the only user of
pyuw_object_attribute_to_pointer, but now I think things are much
clearer. Errors from lower levels are not blindly overridden with the
generic meaningless error message, but we still get the "missing 'sp'
attribute" error when appropriate.
This change also includes the switch to get_addr_from_python which was
what started this whole journey.
For well behaving user code there should be no visible changes after
this commit.
For user code that hits an error, hopefully the new errors should be
more helpful in figuring out what's gone wrong.
Additionally, users can now use integers for the 'sp' and 'pc'
attributes in their frame-id objects if that is useful.
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
The gdb.Frame class has far more methods than gdb.PendingFrame. Given
that a PendingFrame hasn't yet been claimed by an unwinder, there is a
limit to which methods we can add to it, but many of the methods that
the Frame class has, the PendingFrame class could also support.
In this commit I've added those methods to PendingFrame that I believe
are safe.
In terms of implementation: if I was starting from scratch then I
would implement many of these (or most of these) as attributes rather
than methods. However, given both Frame and PendingFrame are just
different representation of a frame, I think there is value in keeping
the interface for the two classes the same. For this reason
everything here is a method -- that's what the Frame class does.
The new methods I've added are:
- gdb.PendingFrame.is_valid: Return True if the pending frame
object is valid.
- gdb.PendingFrame.name: Return the name for the frame's function,
or None.
- gdb.PendingFrame.pc: Return the $pc register value for this
frame.
- gdb.PendingFrame.language: Return a string containing the
language for this frame, or None.
- gdb.PendingFrame.find_sal: Return a gdb.Symtab_and_line object
for the current location within the pending frame, or None.
- gdb.PendingFrame.block: Return a gdb.Block for the current
pending frame, or None.
- gdb.PendingFrame.function: Return a gdb.Symbol for the current
pending frame, or None.
In every case I've just copied the implementation over from gdb.Frame
and cleaned the code slightly e.g. NULL to nullptr. Additionally each
function required a small update to reflect the PendingFrame type, but
that's pretty minor.
There are tests for all the new methods.
For more extensive testing, I added the following code to the file
gdb/python/lib/command/unwinders.py:
from gdb.unwinder import Unwinder
class TestUnwinder(Unwinder):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__("XXX_TestUnwinder_XXX")
def __call__(self,pending_frame):
lang = pending_frame.language()
try:
block = pending_frame.block()
assert isinstance(block, gdb.Block)
except RuntimeError as rte:
assert str(rte) == "Cannot locate block for frame."
function = pending_frame.function()
arch = pending_frame.architecture()
assert arch is None or isinstance(arch, gdb.Architecture)
name = pending_frame.name()
assert name is None or isinstance(name, str)
valid = pending_frame.is_valid()
pc = pending_frame.pc()
sal = pending_frame.find_sal()
assert sal is None or isinstance(sal, gdb.Symtab_and_line)
return None
gdb.unwinder.register_unwinder(None, TestUnwinder())
This registers a global unwinder that calls each of the new
PendingFrame methods and checks the result is of an acceptable type.
The unwinder never claims any frames though, so shouldn't change how
GDB actually behaves.
I then ran the testsuite. There was only a single regression, a test
that uses 'disable unwinder' and expects a single unwinder to be
disabled -- the extra unwinder is now disabled too, which changes the
test output. So I'm reasonably confident that the new methods are not
going to crash GDB.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
This commit makes a few related changes to the gdb.unwinder.Unwinder
class attributes:
1. The 'name' attribute is now a read-only attribute. This prevents
user code from changing the name after registering the unwinder. It
seems very unlikely that any user is actually trying to do this in
the wild, so I'm not very worried that this will upset anyone,
2. We now validate that the name is a string in the
Unwinder.__init__ method, and throw an error if this is not the
case. Hopefully nobody was doing this in the wild. This should
make it easier to ensure the 'info unwinder' command shows sane
output (how to display a non-string name for an unwinder?),
3. The 'enabled' attribute is now implemented with a getter and
setter. In the setter we ensure that the new value is a boolean,
but the real important change is that we call
'gdb.invalidate_cached_frames()'. This means that the backtrace
will be updated if a user manually disables an unwinder (rather than
calling the 'disable unwinder' command). It is not unreasonable to
think that a user might register multiple unwinders (relating to
some project) and have one command that disables/enables all the
related unwinders. This command might operate by poking the enabled
attribute of each unwinder object directly, after this commit, this
would now work correctly.
There's tests for all the changes, and lots of documentation updates
that both cover the new changes, but also further improve (I think)
the general documentation for GDB's Unwinder API.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
This changes gdb to use scalar arithmetic for expression evaluation.
I suspect this patch is not truly complete, as there may be code paths
that still don't correctly handle 128-bit integers. However, many
things do work now.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30190
|
|
AIX now supports vector register contents debugging for both VMX
VSX registers.
|
|
Now that index cache files are written in the background, one test in
index-cache.exp is racy -- it assumes that the cache file will have
been written during startup.
This patch fixes the problem by introducing a new maintenance command
to wait for all pending writes to the index cache.
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
[ This is a simplified rewrite of an earlier submission "[RFC][gdb/symtab] Add
maint set symbol-read-order", submitted here (
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-September/192044.html
). ]
With the test-case included in this patch, we run into:
...
(gdb) file dwarf2-and-ctf
(gdb) print var_ctf^M
'var_ctf' has unknown type; cast it to its declared type^M
...
The problem is that the executable contains both ctf and dwarf2, so the ctf
info (which contains the type information about var_ctf) is ignored.
GDB has support for handling multiple debug formats, but the common use case
for ctf is to be used when dwarf2 is not present, and gdb reflects that,
assuming that by reading ctf in addition there won't be any extra information,
so it's not worth the additional cycles and memory.
Add a new command "set/show always-read-ctf on/off", that when on forces
unconditional reading of ctf, allowing us to do:
...
(gdb) set always-read-ctf on
(gdb) file dwarf2-and-ctf
(gdb) print var_ctf^M
$2 = 2^M
...
The setting is off by default, preserving current behaviour.
A bit of background on the relevance of reading order: the formats have a
priority relationship between them, where reading earlier means lower
priority. By reading the format with the most detail last, we ensure it has
the highest priority, which makes sure that in case there is overlapping info,
the most detailed info is found. This explains the current reading order of
mdebug, stabs and dwarf2.
Add the unconditional reading of ctf before dwarf2, because it's less detailed
than dwarf2. The conditional reading of ctf is still done after the attempt to
read dwarf2, necessarily so because we only know whether there's dwarf2 after
we've tried to read it.
The new command allow us to replace uses of -Wl,--strip-debug added in commit
908a926ec4e ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix ctf test-cases on openSUSE Tumbleweed") by
uses of "set always-read-ctf on", but I've left that for another commit.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
When creating a thread-specific breakpoint with a single location, the
'thread' field would be repeated in the MI output. This can be seen
in two existing tests gdb.mi/mi-nsmoribund.exp and
gdb.mi/mi-pending.exp, e.g.:
(gdb)
-break-insert -p 1 bar
^done,bkpt={number="1",type="breakpoint",disp="keep",
enabled="y",
addr="0x000000000040110a",func="bar",
file="/tmp/mi-thread-specific-bp.c",
fullname="/tmp/mi-thread-specific-bp.c",
line="32",thread-groups=["i1"],
thread="1",thread="1", <================ DUPLICATION!
times="0",original-location="bar"}
I know we need to be careful when adjusting MI output, but I'm hopeful
in this case, as the field is duplicated, and the field contents are
always identical, that we might get away with removing one of the
duplicates.
The change in GDB is a fairly trivial condition change.
We did have a couple of tests that contained the duplicate fields in
their expected output, but given there was no comment pointing out
this oddity either in the GDB code, or in the test, I suspect this was
more a case of copying whatever output GDB produced and using that as
the expected results. I've updated these tests to remove the
duplication.
I've update lib/mi-support.exp to provide support for building
breakpoint patterns that contain the thread field, and I've made use
of this in a new test I've added that is just about creating
thread-specific breakpoints and checking the results. The two tests I
mentioned above as being updated could also use the new
lib/mi-support.exp functionality, but I'm going to do that in a later
patch, this way it is clear what changes I'm actually proposing to
make to the expected output.
As I said, I hope that frontends will be able to handle this change,
but I still think its worth adding a NEWS entry, that way, if someone
runs into problems, there's a chance they can figure out what's going
on.
This should not impact CLI output at all.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
|
|
For testing a following patch, I wanted a way to send a SIGINT to GDB
from a breakpoint condition. And I didn't want to do it from a Python
breakpoint or Python function, as I wanted to exercise non-Python code
paths. So I thought I'd add a new $_shell internal function, that
runs a command under the shell, and returns the exit code. With this,
I could write:
(gdb) b foo if $_shell("kill -SIGINT $gdb_pid") != 0 || <other condition>
I think this is generally useful, hence I'm proposing it here.
Here's the new function in action:
(gdb) p $_shell("true")
$1 = 0
(gdb) p $_shell("false")
$2 = 1
(gdb) p $_shell("echo hello")
hello
$3 = 0
(gdb) p $_shell("foobar")
bash: line 1: foobar: command not found
$4 = 127
(gdb) help function _shell
$_shell - execute a shell command and returns the result.
Usage: $_shell (command)
Returns the command's exit code: zero on success, non-zero otherwise.
(gdb)
NEWS and manual changes included.
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Change-Id: I7e36d451ee6b428cbf41fded415ae2d6b4efaa4e
|
|
After this mailing list posting:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-February/196607.html
it seems to me that in practice an Ada task maps 1:1 with a GDB
thread, and so it doesn't really make sense to allow uses to give both
a thread and a task within a single breakpoint or watchpoint
condition.
This commit updates GDB so that the user will get an error if both
are specified.
I've added new tests to cover the CLI as well as the Python and Guile
APIs. For the Python and Guile testing, as far as I can tell, this
was the first testing for this corner of the APIs, so I ended up
adding more than just a single test.
For documentation I've added a NEWS entry, but I've not added anything
to the docs themselves. Currently we document the commands with a
thread-id or task-id as distinct command, e.g.:
'break LOCSPEC task TASKNO'
'break LOCSPEC task TASKNO if ...'
'break LOCSPEC thread THREAD-ID'
'break LOCSPEC thread THREAD-ID if ...'
As such, I don't believe there is any indication that combining 'task'
and 'thread' would be expected to work; it seems clear to me in the
above that those four options are all distinct commands.
I think the NEWS entry is enough that if someone is combining these
keywords (it's not clear what the expected behaviour would be in this
case) then they can figure out that this was a deliberate change in
GDB, but for a new user, the manual doesn't suggest combining them is
OK, and any future attempt to combine them will give an error.
Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
|
|
This commit introduces the idea of loading only part of an array in
order to print it, what I call "limited length" arrays.
The motivation behind this work is to make it possible to print slices
of very large arrays, where very large means bigger than
`max-value-size'.
Consider this GDB session with the current GDB:
(gdb) set max-value-size 100
(gdb) p large_1d_array
value requires 400 bytes, which is more than max-value-size
(gdb) p -elements 10 -- large_1d_array
value requires 400 bytes, which is more than max-value-size
notice that the request to print 10 elements still fails, even though 10
elements should be less than the max-value-size. With a patched version
of GDB:
(gdb) p -elements 10 -- large_1d_array
$1 = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9...}
So now the print has succeeded. It also has loaded `max-value-size'
worth of data into value history, so the recorded value can be accessed
consistently:
(gdb) p -elements 10 -- $1
$2 = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9...}
(gdb) p $1
$3 = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,
20, 21, 22, 23, 24, <unavailable> <repeats 75 times>}
(gdb)
Accesses with other languages work similarly, although for Ada only
C-style [] array element/dimension accesses use history. For both Ada
and Fortran () array element/dimension accesses go straight to the
inferior, bypassing the value history just as with C pointers.
Co-Authored-By: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@embecosm.com>
|
|
Add a new command "maint info frame-unwinders":
...
(gdb) help maint info frame-unwinders
List the frame unwinders currently in effect, starting with the highest \
priority.
...
Output for i386:
...
$ gdb -q -batch -ex "set arch i386" -ex "maint info frame-unwinders"
The target architecture is set to "i386".
dummy DUMMY_FRAME
dwarf2 tailcall TAILCALL_FRAME
inline INLINE_FRAME
i386 epilogue NORMAL_FRAME
dwarf2 NORMAL_FRAME
dwarf2 signal SIGTRAMP_FRAME
i386 stack tramp NORMAL_FRAME
i386 sigtramp SIGTRAMP_FRAME
i386 prologue NORMAL_FRAME
...
Output for x86_64:
...
$ gdb -q -batch -ex "set arch i386:x86-64" -ex "maint info frame-unwinders"
The target architecture is set to "i386:x86-64".
dummy DUMMY_FRAME
dwarf2 tailcall TAILCALL_FRAME
inline INLINE_FRAME
python NORMAL_FRAME
amd64 epilogue NORMAL_FRAME
i386 epilogue NORMAL_FRAME
dwarf2 NORMAL_FRAME
dwarf2 signal SIGTRAMP_FRAME
amd64 sigtramp SIGTRAMP_FRAME
amd64 prologue NORMAL_FRAME
i386 stack tramp NORMAL_FRAME
i386 sigtramp SIGTRAMP_FRAME
i386 prologue NORMAL_FRAME
...
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
When creating a breakpoint or watchpoint, the 'thread' and 'task'
keywords can be used to create a thread or task specific breakpoint or
watchpoint.
Currently, a thread or task specific breakpoint can only apply for a
single thread or task, if multiple threads or tasks are specified when
creating the breakpoint (or watchpoint), then the last specified id
will be used.
The exception to the above is that when the 'thread' keyword is used
during the creation of a watchpoint, GDB will give an error if
'thread' is given more than once.
In this commit I propose making this behaviour consistent, if the
'thread' or 'task' keywords are used more than once when creating
either a breakpoint or watchpoint, then GDB will give an error.
I haven't updated the manual, we don't explicitly say that these
keywords can be repeated, and (to me), given the keyword takes a
single id, I don't think it makes much sense to repeat the keyword.
As such, I see this more as adding a missing error to GDB, rather than
making some big change. However, I have added an entry to the NEWS
file as I guess it is possible that some people might hit this new
error with an existing (I claim, badly written) GDB script.
I've added some new tests to check for the new error.
Just one test needed updating, gdb.linespec/keywords.exp, this test
did use the 'thread' keyword twice, and expected the breakpoint to be
created. Looking at what this test was for though, it was checking
the use of '-force-condition', and I don't think that being able to
repeat 'thread' was actually a critical part of this test.
As such, I've updated this test to expect the error when 'thread' is
repeated.
|
|
This patch adds the foundation for GDB to be able to debug programs
offloaded to AMD GPUs using the AMD ROCm platform [1]. The latest
public release of the ROCm release at the time of writing is 5.4, so
this is what this patch targets.
The ROCm platform allows host programs to schedule bits of code for
execution on GPUs or similar accelerators. The programs running on GPUs
are typically referred to as `kernels` (not related to operating system
kernels).
Programs offloaded with the AMD ROCm platform can be written in the HIP
language [2], OpenCL and OpenMP, but we're going to focus on HIP here.
The HIP language consists of a C++ Runtime API and kernel language.
Here's an example of a very simple HIP program:
#include "hip/hip_runtime.h"
#include <cassert>
__global__ void
do_an_addition (int a, int b, int *out)
{
*out = a + b;
}
int
main ()
{
int *result_ptr, result;
/* Allocate memory for the device to write the result to. */
hipError_t error = hipMalloc (&result_ptr, sizeof (int));
assert (error == hipSuccess);
/* Run `do_an_addition` on one workgroup containing one work item. */
do_an_addition<<<dim3(1), dim3(1), 0, 0>>> (1, 2, result_ptr);
/* Copy result from device to host. Note that this acts as a synchronization
point, waiting for the kernel dispatch to complete. */
error = hipMemcpyDtoH (&result, result_ptr, sizeof (int));
assert (error == hipSuccess);
printf ("result is %d\n", result);
assert (result == 3);
return 0;
}
This program can be compiled with:
$ hipcc simple.cpp -g -O0 -o simple
... where `hipcc` is the HIP compiler, shipped with ROCm releases. This
generates an ELF binary for the host architecture, containing another
ELF binary with the device code. The ELF for the device can be
inspected with:
$ roc-obj-ls simple
1 host-x86_64-unknown-linux file://simple#offset=8192&size=0
1 hipv4-amdgcn-amd-amdhsa--gfx906 file://simple#offset=8192&size=34216
$ roc-obj-extract 'file://simple#offset=8192&size=34216'
$ file simple-offset8192-size34216.co
simple-offset8192-size34216.co: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, *unknown arch 0xe0* version 1, dynamically linked, with debug_info, not stripped
^
amcgcn architecture that my `file` doesn't know about ----´
Running the program gives the very unimpressive result:
$ ./simple
result is 3
While running, this host program has copied the device program into the
GPU's memory and spawned an execution thread on it. The goal of this
GDB port is to let the user debug host threads and these GPU threads
simultaneously. Here's a sample session using a GDB with this patch
applied:
$ ./gdb -q -nx --data-directory=data-directory ./simple
Reading symbols from ./simple...
(gdb) break do_an_addition
Function "do_an_addition" not defined.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y
Breakpoint 1 (do_an_addition) pending.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb-amdgpu/gdb/simple
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
[New Thread 0x7ffff5db7640 (LWP 1082911)]
[New Thread 0x7ffef53ff640 (LWP 1082913)]
[Thread 0x7ffef53ff640 (LWP 1082913) exited]
[New Thread 0x7ffdecb53640 (LWP 1083185)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff54bf640 (LWP 1083186)]
[Thread 0x7ffdecb53640 (LWP 1083185) exited]
[Switching to AMDGPU Wave 2:2:1:1 (0,0,0)/0]
Thread 6 hit Breakpoint 1, do_an_addition (a=<error reading variable: DWARF-2 expression error: `DW_OP_regx' operations must be used either alone or in conjunction with DW_OP_piece or DW_OP_bit_piece.>,
b=<error reading variable: DWARF-2 expression error: `DW_OP_regx' operations must be used either alone or in conjunction with DW_OP_piece or DW_OP_bit_piece.>,
out=<error reading variable: DWARF-2 expression error: `DW_OP_regx' operations must be used either alone or in conjunction with DW_OP_piece or DW_OP_bit_piece.>) at simple.cpp:24
24 *out = a + b;
(gdb) info inferiors
Num Description Connection Executable
* 1 process 1082907 1 (native) /home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb-amdgpu/gdb/simple
(gdb) info threads
Id Target Id Frame
1 Thread 0x7ffff5dc9240 (LWP 1082907) "simple" 0x00007ffff5e9410b in ?? () from /opt/rocm-5.4.0/lib/libhsa-runtime64.so.1
2 Thread 0x7ffff5db7640 (LWP 1082911) "simple" __GI___ioctl (fd=3, request=3222817548) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ioctl.c:36
5 Thread 0x7ffff54bf640 (LWP 1083186) "simple" __GI___ioctl (fd=3, request=3222817548) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ioctl.c:36
* 6 AMDGPU Wave 2:2:1:1 (0,0,0)/0 do_an_addition (
a=<error reading variable: DWARF-2 expression error: `DW_OP_regx' operations must be used either alone or in conjunction with DW_OP_piece or DW_OP_bit_piece.>,
b=<error reading variable: DWARF-2 expression error: `DW_OP_regx' operations must be used either alone or in conjunction with DW_OP_piece or DW_OP_bit_piece.>,
out=<error reading variable: DWARF-2 expression error: `DW_OP_regx' operations must be used either alone or in conjunction with DW_OP_piece or DW_OP_bit_piece.>) at simple.cpp:24
(gdb) bt
Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'>: Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xe1
#0 do_an_addition (a=<error reading variable: DWARF-2 expression error: `DW_OP_regx' operations must be used either alone or in conjunction with DW_OP_piece or DW_OP_bit_piece.>,
b=<error reading variable: DWARF-2 expression error: `DW_OP_regx' operations must be used either alone or in conjunction with DW_OP_piece or DW_OP_bit_piece.>,
out=<error reading variable: DWARF-2 expression error: `DW_OP_regx' operations must be used either alone or in conjunction with DW_OP_piece or DW_OP_bit_piece.>) at simple.cpp:24
(gdb) continue
Continuing.
result is 3
warning: Temporarily disabling breakpoints for unloaded shared library "file:///home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb-amdgpu/gdb/simple#offset=8192&size=67208"
[Thread 0x7ffff54bf640 (LWP 1083186) exited]
[Thread 0x7ffff5db7640 (LWP 1082911) exited]
[Inferior 1 (process 1082907) exited normally]
One thing to notice is the host and GPU threads appearing under
the same inferior. This is a design goal for us, as programmers tend to
think of the threads running on the GPU as part of the same program as
the host threads, so showing them in the same inferior in GDB seems
natural. Also, the host and GPU threads share a global memory space,
which fits the inferior model.
Another thing to notice is the error messages when trying to read
variables or printing a backtrace. This is expected for the moment,
since the AMD GPU compiler produces some DWARF that uses some
non-standard extensions:
https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUDwarfExtensionsForHeterogeneousDebugging.html
There were already some patches posted by Zoran Zaric earlier to make
GDB support these extensions:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20211105113849.118800-1-zoran.zaric@amd.com/
We think it's better to get the basic support for AMD GPU in first,
which will then give a better justification for GDB to support these
extensions.
GPU threads are named `AMDGPU Wave`: a wave is essentially a hardware
thread using the SIMT (single-instruction, multiple-threads) [3]
execution model.
GDB uses the amd-dbgapi library [4], included in the ROCm platform, for
a few things related to AMD GPU threads debugging. Different components
talk to the library, as show on the following diagram:
+---------------------------+ +-------------+ +------------------+
| GDB | amd-dbgapi target | <-> | AMD | | Linux kernel |
| +-------------------+ | Debugger | +--------+ |
| | amdgcn gdbarch | <-> | API | <=> | AMDGPU | |
| +-------------------+ | | | driver | |
| | solib-rocm | <-> | (dbgapi.so) | +--------+---------+
+---------------------------+ +-------------+
- The amd-dbgapi target is a target_ops implementation used to control
execution of GPU threads. While the debugging of host threads works
by using the ptrace / wait Linux kernel interface (as usual), control
of GPU threads is done through a special interface (dubbed `kfd`)
exposed by the `amdgpu` Linux kernel module. GDB doesn't interact
directly with `kfd`, but instead goes through the amd-dbgapi library
(AMD Debugger API on the diagram).
Since it provides execution control, the amd-dbgapi target should
normally be a process_stratum_target, not just a target_ops. More
on that later.
- The amdgcn gdbarch (describing the hardware architecture of the GPU
execution units) offloads some requests to the amd-dbgapi library,
so that knowledge about the various architectures doesn't need to be
duplicated and baked in GDB. This is for example for things like
the list of registers.
- The solib-rocm component is an solib provider that fetches the list of
code objects loaded on the device from the amd-dbgapi library, and
makes GDB read their symbols. This is very similar to other solib
providers that handle shared libraries, except that here the shared
libraries are the pieces of code loaded on the device.
Given that Linux host threads are managed by the linux-nat target, and
the GPU threads are managed by the amd-dbgapi target, having all threads
appear in the same inferior requires the two targets to be in that
inferior's target stack. However, there can only be one
process_stratum_target in a given target stack, since there can be only
one target per slot. To achieve it, we therefore resort the hack^W
solution of placing the amd-dbgapi target in the arch_stratum slot of
the target stack, on top of the linux-nat target. Doing so allows the
amd-dbgapi target to intercept target calls and handle them if they
concern GPU threads, and offload to beneath otherwise. See
amd_dbgapi_target::fetch_registers for a simple example:
void
amd_dbgapi_target::fetch_registers (struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
{
if (!ptid_is_gpu (regcache->ptid ()))
{
beneath ()->fetch_registers (regcache, regno);
return;
}
// handle it
}
ptids of GPU threads are crafted with the following pattern:
(pid, 1, wave id)
Where pid is the inferior's pid and "wave id" is the wave handle handed
to us by the amd-dbgapi library (in practice, a monotonically
incrementing integer). The idea is that on Linux systems, the
combination (pid != 1, lwp == 1) is not possible. lwp == 1 would always
belong to the init process, which would also have pid == 1 (and it's
improbable for the init process to offload work to the GPU and much less
for the user to debug it). We can therefore differentiate GPU and
non-GPU ptids this way. See ptid_is_gpu for more details.
Note that we believe that this scheme could break down in the context of
containers, where the initial process executed in a container has pid 1
(in its own pid namespace). For instance, if you were to execute a ROCm
program in a container, then spawn a GDB in that container and attach to
the process, it will likely not work. This is a known limitation. A
workaround for this is to have a dummy process (like a shell) fork and
execute the program of interest.
The amd-dbgapi target watches native inferiors, and "attaches" to them
using amd_dbgapi_process_attach, which gives it a notifier fd that is
registered in the event loop (see enable_amd_dbgapi). Note that this
isn't the same "attach" as in PTRACE_ATTACH, but being ptrace-attached
is a precondition for amd_dbgapi_process_attach to work. When the
debugged process enables the ROCm runtime, the amd-dbgapi target gets
notified through that fd, and pushes itself on the target stack of the
inferior. The amd-dbgapi target is then able to intercept target_ops
calls. If the debugged process disables the ROCm runtime, the
amd-dbgapi target unpushes itself from the target stack.
This way, the amd-dbgapi target's footprint stays minimal when debugging
a process that doesn't use the AMD ROCm platform, it does not intercept
target calls.
The amd-dbgapi library is found using pkg-config. Since enabling
support for the amdgpu architecture (amdgpu-tdep.c) depends on the
amd-dbgapi library being present, we have the following logic for
the interaction with --target and --enable-targets:
- if the user explicitly asks for amdgcn support with
--target=amdgcn-*-* or --enable-targets=amdgcn-*-*, we probe for
the amd-dbgapi and fail if not found
- if the user uses --enable-targets=all, we probe for amd-dbgapi,
enable amdgcn support if found, disable amdgcn support if not found
- if the user uses --enable-targets=all and --with-amd-dbgapi=yes,
we probe for amd-dbgapi, enable amdgcn if found and fail if not found
- if the user uses --enable-targets=all and --with-amd-dbgapi=no,
we do not probe for amd-dbgapi, disable amdgcn support
- otherwise, amd-dbgapi is not probed for and support for amdgcn is not
enabled
Finally, a simple test is included. It only tests hitting a breakpoint
in device code and resuming execution, pretty much like the example
shown above.
[1] https://docs.amd.com/category/ROCm_v5.4
[2] https://docs.amd.com/bundle/HIP-Programming-Guide-v5.4
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_instruction,_multiple_threads
[4] https://docs.amd.com/bundle/ROCDebugger-API-Guide-v5.4
Change-Id: I591edca98b8927b1e49e4b0abe4e304765fed9ee
Co-Authored-By: Zoran Zaric <zoran.zaric@amd.com>
Co-Authored-By: Laurent Morichetti <laurent.morichetti@amd.com>
Co-Authored-By: Tony Tye <Tony.Tye@amd.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lancelot SIX <lancelot.six@amd.com>
Co-Authored-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
|
|
This patch adds per-remote target variables for the configuration of
memory read- and write packet size. It is a further change to commit
"gdb: Make global feature array a per-remote target array" to apply the
fixme notes described in commit 5b6d1e4 "Multi-target support".
The former global variables for that configuration are still available
to allow the command line configuration for all future remote
connections. Similar to the command line configuration of the per-
remote target feature array, the commands
- set remotewritesize (deprecated)
- set remote memory-read-packet-size
- set remote memory-write-packet-size
will configure the current target (if available). If no target is
available, the default configuration for future remote connections is
adapted. The show command will display the current remote target's
packet size configuration. If no remote target is selected, the default
configuration for future connections will be shown.
It is required to adapt the test gdb.base/remote.exp which is failing
for --target_board=native-extended-gdbserver. With that board GDB
connects to gdbserver at gdb start time. Due to this patch two loggings
"The target may not be able to.." are shown if the command 'set remote
memory-write-packet-size fixed' is executed while a target is connected
for the current inferior. To fix this, the clean_restart command is
moved to a later time point of the test. It is sufficient to be
connected to the server when "runto_main" is executed. Now the
connection time is similar to a testrun with
--target_board=native-gdbserver.
To allow the user to distinguish between the packet-size configuration
for future remote connections and for the currently selected target, the
commands' loggings are adapted.
|
|
This patch applies the appropriate FIXME notes described in commit 5b6d1e4
"Multi-target support".
"You'll notice that remote.c includes some FIXME notes. These refer to
the fact that the global arrays that hold data for the remote packets
supported are still globals. For example, if we connect to two
different servers/stubs, then each might support different remote
protocol features. They might even be different architectures, like
e.g., one ARM baremetal stub, and a x86 gdbserver, to debug a
host/controller scenario as a single program. That isn't going to
work correctly today, because of said globals. I'm leaving fixing
that for another pass, since it does not appear to be trivial, and I'd
rather land the base work first. It's already useful to be able to
debug multiple instances of the same server (e.g., a distributed
cluster, where you have full control over the servers installed), so I
think as is it's already reasonable incremental progress."
Using this patch it is possible to configure per-remote targets'
feature packets.
Given the following setup for two gdbservers:
~~~~
gdbserver --multi :1234
gdbserver --disable-packet=vCont --multi :2345
~~~~
Before this patch configuring of range-stepping was not possible for one
of two connected remote targets with different support for the vCont
packet. As one of the targets supports vCont, it should be possible to
configure "set range-stepping". However, the output of GDB looks like:
(gdb) target extended-remote :1234
Remote debugging using :1234
(gdb) add-inferior -no-connection
[New inferior 2]
Added inferior 2
(gdb) inferior 2
[Switching to inferior 2 [<null>] (<noexec>)]
(gdb) target extended-remote :2345
Remote debugging using :2345
(gdb) set range-stepping on
warning: Range stepping is not supported by the current target
(gdb) inferior 1
[Switching to inferior 1 [<null>] (<noexec>)]
(gdb) set range-stepping on
warning: Range stepping is not supported by the current target
~~~~
Two warnings are shown. The warning for inferior 1 should not appear
as it is connected to a target supporting the vCont package.
~~~~
(gdb) target extended-remote :1234
Remote debugging using :1234
(gdb) add-inferior -no-connection
[New inferior 2]
Added inferior 2
(gdb) inferior 2
[Switching to inferior 2 [<null>] (<noexec>)]
(gdb) target extended-remote :2345
Remote debugging using :2345
(gdb) set range-stepping on
warning: Range stepping is not supported by the current target
(gdb) inferior 1
[Switching to inferior 1 [<null>] (<noexec>)]
(gdb) set range-stepping on
(gdb)
~~~~
Now only one warning is shown for inferior 2, which is connected to
a target not supporting vCont.
The per-remote target feature array is realized by a new class
remote_features, which stores the per-remote target array and
provides functions to determine supported features of the target.
A remote_target object now has a new member of that class.
Each time a new remote_target object is initialized, a new per-remote
target array is constructed based on the global remote_protocol_packets
array. The global array is initialized in the function _initialize_remote
and can be configured using the command line. Before this patch the
command line configuration affected current targets and future remote
targets (due to the global feature array used by all remote
targets). This behavior is different and the configuration applies as
follows:
- If a target is connected, the command line configuration affects the
current connection. All other existing remote targets are not
affected.
- If not connected, the command line configuration affects future
connections.
The show command displays the current remote target's configuration. If no
remote target is selected the default configuration for future
connections is shown.
If we have for instance the following setup with inferior 2 being
selected:
~~~~
(gdb) info inferiors
Num Description Connection Executable
1 <null> 1 (extended-remote :1234)
* 2 <null> 2 (extended-remote :2345)
~~~~
Before this patch, if we run 'set remote multiprocess-feature-packet', the
following configuration was set:
The feature array of all remote targets (in this setup the two connected
targets) and all future remote connections are affected.
After this patch, it will be configured as follows:
The feature array of target with port :2345 which is currently selected
will be configured. All other existing remote targets are not affected.
The show command 'show remote multiprocess-feature-packet' will display
the configuration of target with port :2345.
Due to this configuration change, it is required to adapt the test
"gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-target-info-inferiors.exp" to configure the
multiprocess-feature-packet before the connections are created.
To inform the gdb user about the new behaviour of the 'show remote
PACKET-NAME' commands and the new configuration impact for remote
targets using the 'set remote PACKET-NAME' commands the commands'
outputs are adapted. Due to this change it is required to adapt each
test using the set/show remote 'PACKET-NAME' commands.
|
|
This commit splits the `set/show print elements' option into two. We
retain `set/show print elements' for controlling how many elements of an
array we print, but a new `set/show print characters' setting is added
which is used for controlling how many characters of a string are
printed.
The motivation behind this change is to allow users a finer level of
control over how data is printed, reflecting that, although strings can
be thought of as arrays of characters, users often want to treat these
two things differently.
For compatibility reasons by default the `set/show print characters'
option is set to `elements', which makes the limit for character strings
follow the setting of the `set/show print elements' option, as it used
to. Using `set print characters' with any other value makes the limit
independent from the `set/show print elements' setting, however it can
be restored to the default with the `set print characters elements'
command at any time.
A corresponding `-characters' option for the `print' command is added,
with the same semantics, i.e. one can use `elements' to make a given
`print' invocation follow the limit of elements, be it set with the
`-elements' option also given with the same invocation or taken from the
`set/show print elements' setting, for characters as well regardless of
the current setting of the `set/show print characters' option.
The GDB changes are all pretty straightforward, just changing references
to the old 'print_max' to use a new `get_print_max_chars' helper which
figures out which of the two of `print_max' and `print_max_chars' values
to use.
Likewise, the documentation is just updated to reference the new setting
where appropriate.
To make people's life easier the message shown by `show print elements'
now indicates if the setting also applies to character strings:
(gdb) set print characters elements
(gdb) show print elements
Limit on string chars or array elements to print is 200.
(gdb) set print characters unlimited
(gdb) show print elements
Limit on array elements to print is 200.
(gdb)
and the help text shows the dependency as well:
(gdb) help set print elements
Set limit on array elements to print.
"unlimited" causes there to be no limit.
This setting also applies to string chars when "print characters"
is set to "elements".
(gdb)
In the testsuite there are two minor updates, one to add `-characters'
to the list of completions now shown for the `print' command, and a bare
minimum pair of checks for the right handling of `set print characters'
and `show print characters', copied from the corresponding checks for
`set print elements' and `show print elements' respectively.
Co-Authored-By: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@embecosm.com>
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
|
|
When executing in reverse and runs out of recorded history, GDB prints
a warning to the user, but does not add a reason in the stopped record,
for example:
*stopped,frame={addr="0x000000000040113e",func="main",args=[],file="/home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.c",fullname="/home/blarsen/Documents/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.c",line="27",arch="i386:x86-64"},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all",core="1"
This problem was reported as record/29260.
This commit adds the reason no-history to the record, making it easier
for interfaces using the mi interpreter to report the result. It also
changes the test gdb.mi/mi-reverse.exp to test that the reason shows up
correctly.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29260
|
|
While chasing some reverse debugging bugs, I found myself wondering what
was recorded by GDB to undo and redo a certain instruction. This commit
implements a simple way of printing that information.
If there isn't enough history to print the desired instruction (such as
when the user hasn't started recording yet or when they request 2
instructions back but only 1 was recorded), GDB warns the user like so:
(gdb) maint print record-instruction
Not enough recorded history
If there is enough, GDB prints the instruction like so:
(gdb) maint print record-instruction
4 bytes of memory at address 0x00007fffffffd5dc changed from: 01 00 00 00
Register eflags changed: [ IF ]
Register rip changed: (void (*)()) 0x401115 <main+15>
Approved-by: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandra Hajkova <ahajkova@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lancelot Six <lsix@lancelotsix.com>
Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
The Debugger Adapter Protocol is a JSON-RPC protocol that IDEs can use
to communicate with debuggers. You can find more information here:
https://microsoft.github.io/debug-adapter-protocol/
Frequently this is implemented as a shim, but it seemed to me that GDB
could implement it directly, via the Python API. This patch is the
initial implementation.
DAP is implemented as a new "interp". This is slightly weird, because
it doesn't act like an ordinary interpreter -- for example it doesn't
implement a command syntax, and doesn't use GDB's ordinary event loop.
However, this seemed like the best approach overall.
To run GDB in this mode, use:
gdb -i=dap
The DAP code will accept JSON-RPC messages on stdin and print
responses to stdout. GDB redirects the inferior's stdout to a new
pipe so that output can be encapsulated by the protocol.
The Python code uses multiple threads to do its work. Separate
threads are used for reading JSON from the client and for writing JSON
to the client. All GDB work is done in the main thread. (The first
implementation used asyncio, but this had some limitations, and so I
rewrote it to use threads instead.)
This is not a complete implementation of the protocol, but it does
implement enough to demonstrate that the overall approach works.
There is a rudimentary test suite. It uses a JSON parser written in
pure Tcl. This parser is under the same license as Tcl itself, so I
felt it was acceptable to simply import it into the tree.
There is also a bit of documentation -- just documenting the new
interpreter name.
|
|
MI version 1 is long since obsolete. Several years ago, I filed
PR mi/23170 for this. I think it's finally time to remove this.
Any users of MI 1 can and should upgrade to a newer version.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23170
|
|
This commit a new section for the next release branch, and renames
the section of the current branch, now that it has been cut.
|
|
Each program space can have an associated core file. Include this
information in the output of 'maint info program-spaces'.
|
|
solib implementations are typically used one at a time. So it will be
rare that you will want to enable debug for one solib kind, and
absolutely want to keep the others disabled. To make things simpler,
instead of adding separate variables / macros / commands for each solib
implementation, merge the existing ones (frv and aix) into a unified
"set/show debug solib", with the solib_debug_printf macro.
Change-Id: I6e18bbc7401724f37ae66681badb079d75ecf7fa
|
|
$_hit_locno PR breakpoints/12464
This implements the request given in PR breakpoints/12464.
Before this patch, when a breakpoint that has multiple locations is reached,
GDB printed:
Thread 1 "zeoes" hit Breakpoint 1, some_func () at somefunc1.c:5
This patch changes the message so that bkpt_print_id prints the precise
encountered breakpoint:
Thread 1 "zeoes" hit Breakpoint 1.2, some_func () at somefunc1.c:5
In mi mode, bkpt_print_id also (optionally) prints a new table field "locno":
locno is printed when the breakpoint hit has more than one location.
Note that according to the GDB user manual node 'GDB/MI Development and Front
Ends', it is ok to add new fields without changing the MI version.
Also, when a breakpoint is reached, the convenience variables
$_hit_bpnum and $_hit_locno are set to the encountered breakpoint number
and location number.
$_hit_bpnum and $_hit_locno can a.o. be used in the command list of a
breakpoint, to disable the specific encountered breakpoint, e.g.
disable $_hit_bpnum.$_hit_locno
In case the breakpoint has only one location, $_hit_locno is set to
the value 1, so as to allow a command such as:
disable $_hit_bpnum.$_hit_locno
to disable the breakpoint even when the breakpoint has only one location.
This also fixes a strange behaviour: when a breakpoint X has only
one location,
enable|disable X.1
is accepted but transforms the breakpoint in a multiple locations
breakpoint having only one location.
The changes in RFA v4 handle the comments of Tom Tromey:
- Changed convenience var names from $bkptno/$locno to
$_hit_bpnum/$_hit_locno.
- updated the tests and user manual accordingly.
User manual also explictly describes that $_hit_locno is set to 1
for a breakpoint with a single location.
- The variable values are now set in bpstat_do_actions_1 so that
they are set for silent breakpoints, and when several breakpoints
are hit at the same time, that the variables are set to the printed
breakpoint.
The changes in RFA v3 handle the additional comments of Eli:
GDB/NEW:
- Use max 80-column
- Use 'code location' instead of 'location'.
- Fix typo $bkpno
- Ensure that disable $bkptno and disable $bkptno.$locno have
each their explanation inthe example
- Reworded the 'breakpoint-hit' paragraph.
gdb.texinfo:
- Use 'code location' instead of 'location'.
- Add a note to clarify the distinction between $bkptno and $bpnum.
- Use @kbd instead of examples with only one command.
Compared to RFA v1, the changes in v2 handle the comments given by
Keith Seitz and Eli Zaretskii:
- Use %s for the result of paddress
- Use bkptno_numopt_re instead of 2 different -re cases
- use C@t{++}
- Add index entries for $bkptno and $locno
- Added an example for "locno" in the mi interface
- Added examples in the Break command manual.
|
|
Add a new convenience variable $_inferior_thread_count that contains
the number of live (non-exited) threads in the current inferior. This
can be used in command scripts, or breakpoint conditions, etc to
adjust the behaviour for multi-threaded inferiors.
This value is only stable in all-stop mode. In non-stop mode, where
new threads can be started, and existing threads exit, at any time,
this convenience variable can give a different value each time it is
evaluated.
|
|
As discussed at:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169519.html
this patch disables source and assembly code highlighting for the
text highlighted by the TUI's current position indicator, and adds a
command to enable it back.
|
|
MI version 1 is long since obsolete. Rather than remove it
immediately (though I did send a patch for that), instead let's
deprecate it in GDB 13 and then remove it for GDB 14.
This version of the patch incorporates Simon's warning change, and
Luis' recommendation to mention the gdb versions here.
|
