aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bfd
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-06-25Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-24Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-23Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-22RISC-V: Clarify the addends of pc-relative access.Nelson Chu2-68/+109
The original discussion was here, https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/issues/184 After discussing with Kito Cheng, I think the addends of %pcrel_hi and %pcrel_lo are both allowed in GNU toolchain. However, both of the them mean the offset of symbols, rather than the pc address. But the addends of %got_pcrel_hi and it's %pcrel_lo do not look reasonable. I believe gcc won't generate the got patterns with addends, so linker should report dangerous relocation errors, in case the assembly code use them. Another issue was here, https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-June/116983.html At the beginnig, I suppose %pcrel_hi and %pcrel_lo are valid only when they are in the same input section. But Jim Wilson points out that gcc may generate %hi and %lo in the different input sections, when -freorder-blocks-and-partition option is used. So that a memory references for a loop may have the %hi outside the loop, but the %lo remain in the loop. However, it is hard to create the testcases, to see if %pcrel_hi and %pcrel_lo have the same behavior. Unfortunately, I notice that the current pcrel resolver cannot work for the above case. For now we build a hash table for pcrel at the start of riscv_elf_relocate_section, and then free the hash at the end. But riscv_elf_relocate_section only handles an input section at a time, so that means we can only resolve the %pcrel_hi and %pcrel_lo which are in the same input section. Otherwise, like the above case, we will report "%pcrel_lo missing matching %pcrel_hi" for them. I have no plan to improve this in the short-term, so maybe we can wait until someone meets the problem before we deal with it. bfd/ * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_pcrel_hi_reloc): Added field to store the original relocation type, in case the type is converted to R_RISCV_HI20. (riscv_pcrel_lo_reloc): Removed unused name field. (riscv_pcrel_relocs): Added comments. (riscv_zero_pcrel_hi_reloc): Removed unused input_bfd. (riscv_record_pcrel_hi_reloc): Updated. (riscv_record_pcrel_lo_reloc): Likewise. (riscv_resolve_pcrel_lo_relocs): Likewise. Check the original type of auipc, to make sure the %pcrel_lo without any addends. Otherwise, report dangerous relocation error. (riscv_elf_relocate_section): Updated above functions are changed. For R_RISCV_GOT_HI20, report dangerous relocation error when addend isn't zero. ld/ * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp: Updated. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/pcrel-lo-addend-3a.d: New testcase. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/pcrel-lo-addend-3a.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/pcrel-lo-addend-3b.d: New testcase. Should report error since the %pcrel_lo with addend refers to %got_pcrel_hi. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/pcrel-lo-addend-3b.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/pcrel-lo-addend-3c.d: New testcase. Should report error since the %got_pcrel_hi with addend. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/pcrel-lo-addend-3c.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/pcrel-lo-addend-3.ld: Likewise.
2021-06-22Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-21Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-19x86: Count PLT for GOTOFF relocation against IFUNC symbolH.J. Lu2-2/+17
Since GOTOFF relocations against IFUNC symbols must go through PLT, set PLT reference count to 1 for GOTOFF relocation. bfd/ PR ld/27998 * elfxx-x86.c (elf_x86_allocate_dynrelocs): Count PLT for GOTOFF relocation against IFUNC symbols. (_bfd_x86_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Likewise. ld/ PR ld/27998 * testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Run PR ld/27998 tests. * testsuite/ld-i386/pr27998a.d: New file. * testsuite/ld-i386/pr27998a.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-i386/pr27998b.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-i386/pr27998b.s: Likewise.
2021-06-20Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-19elf: Correct DT_TEXTREL warning in PDEH.J. Lu2-0/+8
Change ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE to ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PDE on PDE. bfd/ * elflink.c (bfd_elf_final_link): Correct DT_TEXTREL warning in PDE. ld/ * testsuite/ld-x86-64/textrel-1.err: New file. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/textrel-1a.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/textrel-1b.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Run textrel-1 tests.
2021-06-19Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-18elf: Add GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_XXX/GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_XXXH.J. Lu2-0/+97
Implement GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_XXX/GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_XXX: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gnu-gabi/2021q1/000467.html 1. GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_LO..GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_HI #define GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_LO 0xb0000000 #define GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_HI 0xb0007fff A bit in the output pr_data field is set only if it is set in all relocatable input pr_data fields. If all bits in the the output pr_data field are zero, this property should be removed from output. If the bit is 1, all input relocatables have the feature. If the bit is 0 or the property is missing, the info is unknown. 2. GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_LO..GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_HI #define GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_LO 0xb0008000 #define GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_HI 0xb000ffff A bit in the output pr_data field is set if it is set in any relocatable input pr_data fields. If all bits in the the output pr_data field are zero, this property should be removed from output. If the bit is 1, some input relocatables have the feature. If the bit is 0 or the property is missing, the info is unknown. bfd/ * elf-properties.c (_bfd_elf_parse_gnu_properties): Handle GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_LO, GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_HI, GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_LO and GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_HI. (elf_merge_gnu_properties): Likewise. binutils/ * readelf.c (print_gnu_property_note): Handle GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_LO, GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_HI, GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_LO and GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_HI. include/ * elf/common.h (GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_LO): New. (GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_AND_HI): Likewise. (GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_LO): Likewise. (GNU_PROPERTY_UINT32_OR_HI): Likewise. ld/ * testsuite/ld-elf/property-and-1.d: New file. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-and-1.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-and-2.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-and-2.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-and-3.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-and-3.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-and-4.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-and-empty.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-or-1.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-or-1.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-or-2.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-or-2.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-or-3.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-or-3.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-or-4.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-elf/property-or-empty.s: Likewise.
2021-06-18Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-17Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-16Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-15Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-14Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-13Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-12Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-11PR27952, Disallow ET_DYN DF_1_PIE linker inputAlan Modra3-0/+11
This patch adds a new elf_tdata flag, is_pie, set during the linker's open_input_bfds processing. The flag is then used to reject attempts to link a PIE as if it were a shared library. bfd/ PR 27952 * elf-bfd.h (struct elf_obj_tdata): Add is_pie. * elflink.c (elf_link_add_object_symbols): Set is_pie. ld/ PR 27952 * ldelf.c (ldelf_after_open): Error on input PIEs too.
2021-06-11Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-10Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-09Fix the creation of archives for Sparc Solaris2 targets by eliminating the ↵Nick Clifton2-2/+9
support for generic SPARC ELF files. PR 27666 bfd * config.bfd: Do not add the sparc_elf32_vec or sparc_elf64_vec vectors to Sparc Solaris2 targets. ld * testsuite/ld-sparc/sparc.exp: Do not run the sparctests or sparc64tests for Solaris2 targets.
2021-06-09Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-08bfd/elf: Don't read non-existing secondary relocsMichael Matz1-0/+5
I forgot the ChangeLog commit :-/
2021-06-08bfd/elf: Don't read non-existing secondary relocsMichael Matz1-0/+5
Without this we unconditionally try to slurp in secondary relocs for each input section, leading to quadratic behaviour even for strip(1). On write-out we already used a flag to avoid this. So track existence of secondary relocs on read-in as well and only slurp in when needed. This still doesn't implement a proper list of secondary reloc sections, and still would exhibit quadratic behaviour if most input sections have a secondary reloc section. But at least on normal input this avoids any slowdown from trying to handle secondary relocation sections. bfd/ * elf.c (bfd_section_from_shdr): Set has_secondary_relocs flag. (_bfd_elf_slurp_secondary_reloc_section): Use it for early-out.
2021-06-08Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-07fix Dwarf2 build with certain gcc versionsJan Beulich2-2/+6
Older gcc reports: .../bfd/dwarf2.c: In function 'read_ranges': .../bfd/dwarf2.c:3107: error: comparison between signed and unsigned .../bfd/dwarf2.c: In function 'read_rnglists': .../bfd/dwarf2.c:3189: error: comparison between signed and unsigned Similarly for binutils/dwarf.c. Arrange for the left sides of the > to also be unsigned quantities.
2021-06-07Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-06Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-05Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-04Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-03Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-02asan: heap buffer overflow in _bfd_elf_parse_attributesAlan Modra2-3/+8
* elf-attrs.c (_bfd_elf_parse_attributes): Break out of loop if subsection length is too small to cover tag and length field.
2021-06-02Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-06-01Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-05-31RISC-V: PR27566, Do not relax when data segment phase is exp_seg_relro_adjust.Nelson Chu3-2/+37
2021-05-31 Nelson Chu <nelson.chu@sifive.com> Lifang Xia <lifang_xia@c-sky.com> The data segment phase exp_seg_relro_adjust means we are still adjusting the relro segments, so we will get the symbol values which havn't consider the relro. It is dangerous and we shouldn't do the relaxations at this stage. Otherwise, we may get the truncated fails when the relax range crossing the data segment. One of the solution is that, we use a pointer to monitor the data segment phase while relaxing, to know whether the relro has been handled or not. Once we check the phase is exp_seg_relro_adjust, we should skip this round of relaxations, since the incorrect symbol values will affect the correctness of relaxations. I think we probably need to record more information about data segment or alignments in the future, to make sure it is safe to doing relaxations. For the two new testcases, relro-relax-lui and relro-relax-pcrel, we get the following truncated errors when using toolchains, which enable relro: (.text+0x0): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against symbol `SymbolRodata' defined in .rodata section in test1.o After applying this patch, the truncated errors should be resolved. However, only linux toolchains support -z relro, so we only test these two testcases when supporting shared library. bfd/ PR 27566 * elfnn-riscv.c (struct riscv_elf_link_hash_table): New integer pointer to monitor the data segment phase. (bfd_elfNN_riscv_set_data_segment_info): New function called by after_allocation, to set the data_segment_phase from expld.dataseg. (_bfd_riscv_relax_section): Don't relax when data_segment_phase is exp_seg_relro_adjust (0x4). * elfxx-riscv.h (bfd_elf32_riscv_set_data_segment_info): New extern. (bfd_elf64_riscv_set_data_segment_info): Likewise. ld/ PR 27566 * emultempl/riscvelf.em (after_allocation): Call riscv_set_data_segment_info to set data segment phase before relaxing. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp: Updated. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relro-relax-lui.d: New testcase. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relro-relax-lui.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relro-relax-pcrel.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relro-relax-pcrel.s: Likewise.
2021-05-31Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-05-30Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-05-29Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-05-28x86: Restore PC16 relocation overflow checkH.J. Lu5-45/+25
The x86-64 psABI has --- A program or object file using R_X86_64_8, R_X86_64_16, R_X86_64_PC16 or R_X86_64_PC8 relocations is not conformant to this ABI, these relocations are only added for documentation purposes. --- Since x86 PC16 relocations have been used for 16-bit programs in an ELF32 or ELF64 container, PC16 relocation should wrap-around in 16-bit address space. Revert commit a7664973b24a242cd9ea17deb5eaf503065fc0bd Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Date: Mon Apr 26 10:41:35 2021 +0200 x86: correct overflow checking for 16-bit PC-relative relocs and xfail the related tests. Also revert commit 50c95a739c91ae70cf8481936611aa1f5397a384 Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> Date: Wed May 26 12:13:13 2021 -0700 x86: Propery check PC16 reloc overflow in 16-bit mode instructions while keeping PR ld/27905 tests for PC16 relocation in 16-bit programs. bfd/ PR ld/27905 * elf32-i386.c: Don't include "libiberty.h". (elf_howto_table): Revert commits a7664973b24 and 50c95a739c9. (elf_i386_rtype_to_howto): Revert commit 50c95a739c9. (elf_i386_info_to_howto_rel): Likewise. (elf_i386_tls_transition): Likewise. (elf_i386_relocate_section): Likewise. * elf64-x86-64.c (x86_64_elf_howto_table): Revert commits a7664973b24 and 50c95a739c9. (elf_x86_64_rtype_to_howto): Revert commit 50c95a739c9. * elfxx-x86.c (_bfd_x86_elf_parse_gnu_properties): Likewise. * elfxx-x86.h (elf_x86_obj_tdata): Likewise. (elf_x86_has_code16): Likewise. binutils/ PR ld/27905 * readelf.c (decode_x86_feature_2): Revert commit 50c95a739c9. gas/ PR ld/27905 * config/tc-i386.c (set_code_flag): Revert commit 50c95a739c9. (set_16bit_gcc_code_flag): Likewise. (x86_cleanup): Likewise. * testsuite/gas/i386/code16-2.d: Updated. * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-code16-2.d: Likewise. include/ PR ld/27905 * elf/common.h (GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_2_CODE16): Removed. ld/ PR ld/27905 * testsuite/ld-i386/pcrel16-2.d: xfail. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pcrel16-2.d: Likewise.
2021-05-28Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-05-27Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-05-26x86: Propery check PC16 reloc overflow in 16-bit mode instructionsH.J. Lu5-7/+64
commit a7664973b24a242cd9ea17deb5eaf503065fc0bd Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Date: Mon Apr 26 10:41:35 2021 +0200 x86: correct overflow checking for 16-bit PC-relative relocs caused linker failure when building 16-bit program in a 32-bit ELF container. Update GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_2_USED with #define GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_2_CODE16 (1U << 12) to indicate that 16-bit mode instructions are used in the input object: https://groups.google.com/g/x86-64-abi/c/UvvXWeHIGMA to indicate that 16-bit mode instructions are used in the object to allow linker to properly perform relocation overflow check for 16-bit PC-relative relocations in 16-bit mode instructions. 1. Update x86 assembler to always generate the GNU property note with GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_2_CODE16 for .code16 in ELF object. 2. Update i386 and x86-64 linkers to use 16-bit PC16 relocations if input object is marked with GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_2_CODE16. bfd/ PR ld/27905 * elf32-i386.c: Include "libiberty.h". (elf_howto_table): Add 16-bit R_386_PC16 entry. (elf_i386_rtype_to_howto): Add a BFD argument. Use 16-bit R_386_PC16 if input has 16-bit mode instructions. (elf_i386_info_to_howto_rel): Update elf_i386_rtype_to_howto call. (elf_i386_tls_transition): Likewise. (elf_i386_relocate_section): Likewise. * elf64-x86-64.c (x86_64_elf_howto_table): Add 16-bit R_X86_64_PC16 entry. (elf_x86_64_rtype_to_howto): Use 16-bit R_X86_64_PC16 if input has 16-bit mode instructions. * elfxx-x86.c (_bfd_x86_elf_parse_gnu_properties): Set elf_x86_has_code16 if relocatable input is marked with GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_2_CODE16. * elfxx-x86.h (elf_x86_obj_tdata): Add has_code16. (elf_x86_has_code16): New. binutils/ PR ld/27905 * readelf.c (decode_x86_feature_2): Support GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_2_CODE16. gas/ PR ld/27905 * config/tc-i386.c (set_code_flag): Update x86_feature_2_used with GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_2_CODE16 for .code16 in ELF object. (set_16bit_gcc_code_flag): Likewise. (x86_cleanup): Always generate the GNU property note if x86_feature_2_used isn't 0. * testsuite/gas/i386/code16-2.d: New file. * testsuite/gas/i386/code16-2.s: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-code16-2.d: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp: Run code16-2 and x86-64-code16-2. include/ PR ld/27905 * elf/common.h (GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_2_CODE16): New. ld/ PR ld/27905 * testsuite/ld-i386/code16.d: New file. * testsuite/ld-i386/code16.t: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/code16.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/code16.t: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Run code16. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Likewise.
2021-05-26RISC-V: Allow to link the objects with unknown prefixed extensions.Nelson Chu4-1/+13
Since the policies of GNU and llvm toolchain are different for now, current binutils mainline cannot accept any draft extensions, including rvv, zfh, .... The Clang/LLVM allows these draft stuff on mainline, but the GNU ld might be used with them, so this causes the link time problems. The patch allows ld to link the objects with unknown prefixed extensions, which are probably generated by LLVM or customized toolchains. bfd/ * elfxx-riscv.h (check_unknown_prefixed_ext): New bool. * elfxx-riscv.c (riscv_parse_prefixed_ext): Do not check the prefixed extension name if check_unknown_prefixed_ext is false. * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_merge_arch_attr_info): Set check_unknown_prefixed_ext to false for linker. gas/ * config/tc-riscv.c (riscv_set_arch): Set check_unknown_prefixed_ext to true for assembler.
2021-05-26Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-05-25Add range checks to local array accesses in elf32-arm.c.Nick Clifton2-21/+105
bfd * elf32-arn.c (struct elf_arm_obj_tdata): Add num_entries field. (elf32_arm_num_entries): New macro. (elf32_arm_allocate_local_sym_info): Initialise the new field. Allocate arrays individually so that buffer overruns can be detected by memory checkers. (elf32_arm_create_local_iplt): Check num_entries. (elf32_arm_get_plt_info): Likewise. (elf32_arm_final_link_relocate): Likewise. (elf32_arm_check_relocs): Likewise. (elf32_arm_size_dynamic_sections): Likewise. (elf32_arm_output_arch_local_syms): Likewise.
2021-05-25Fix formatting in elf32-arm.cNick Clifton2-183/+203
2021-05-25asan: _bfd_elf_parse_attributes heap buffer overflowAlan Modra2-40/+81
I exposed a problem with the change in commit 574ec1084d to the outer loop of _bfd_elf_parse_attributes. "p_end - p >= 4" is better than "p < p_end - 4" as far as pointer UB is concerned if the size of the attritbute section is say, 3 bytes. However you do need to ensure p never exceeds p_end, and that length remaining is kept consistent with the pointer. * elf-attrs.c (elf_attr_strdup): New function. (_bfd_elf_attr_strdup): Use it here. (elf_add_obj_attr_string): New function, extracted from.. (bfd_elf_add_obj_attr_string): ..here. (elf_add_obj_attr_int_string): New function, extracted from.. (bfd_elf_add_obj_attr_int_string): ..here. (_bfd_elf_parse_attributes): Don't allocate an extra byte for a string terminator. Instead ensure parsing doesn't go past end of sub-section. Use size_t variables for lengths.
2021-05-25Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2021-05-24Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1