aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-09-01aarch64: Fix -i option for aarch64-genacazuc1-1/+1
Only the long option --gen-idx was recognized to generate aarch64-tbl-2.h
2025-09-01Re: readelf: Add --got-contents optionAlan Modra8-34/+12
The cris ld testsuite uses readelf -a. The extra output now means that a number of tests fail. Fix that by not using -a, but rather the options corresponding to output checked in the dump files. * testsuite/ld-cris/tls-local-63.d: Replace -a option with -r -s. Remove now unnecessary #... and superfluous unwind message. * testsuite/ld-cris/tls-local-64.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-cris/tls-und-38.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-cris/tls-und-42.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-cris/tls-und-46.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-cris/tls-und-50.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-cris/weakref3.d: Replace -a with -S -r -s, and remove unwind message. * testsuite/ld-cris/weakref4.d: Likewise.
2025-09-01[gdb] Fix handling of aborted inferior callTom de Vries2-3/+46
PR gdb/33069 reports the following behavior: ... $ gdb -q ls -ex starti -ex "b *1" Reading symbols from ls... (No debugging symbols found in ls) Starting program: /usr/bin/ls Program stopped. 0x00007ffff7fe4f00 in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Breakpoint 1 at 0x1 (gdb) p (int)strlen("abc") Warning: Cannot insert breakpoint 1. Cannot access memory at address 0x1 Command aborted. An error occurred while in a function called from GDB. Evaluation of the expression containing the function (malloc@plt) will be abandoned. When the function is done executing, GDB will silently stop. [1]+ Stopped gdb -q ls -ex starti -ex "b *1" $ fg gdb -q ls -ex starti -ex "b *1" (gdb) ... with gdb being unresponsive to further input. PR gdb/33068 reports a similar problem, but using gdbserver, and in that case gdb doesn't go into the background, but is likewise unresponsive. This is a regression since commit b1c0ab20809 ("gdb: avoid double stop after failed breakpoint condition check"), and consequently since release gdb 14.1. The commit changed this in run_inferior_call: ... if (current_ui->prompt_state == PROMPT_BLOCKED) - current_ui->unregister_file_handler (); - else - current_ui->register_file_handler (); + { + if (call_thread->thread_fsm ()->finished_p ()) + async_disable_stdin (); + else + async_enable_stdin (); + } ... which means current_ui->register_file_handler is no longer called in the current_ui->prompt_state == PROMPT_NEEDED case. Fix this by: - restoring this behavior, fixing the unresponsiveness, and - adding target_terminal::ours alongside it, fixing the problem that gdb goes into the background. Add a new test-case gdb.base/infcall-failure-2.exp, a regression test for the unresponsiveness issue. The problem of gdb going into the background did not reproduce in the test-case. Tested on x86_64-linux. Reviewed-By: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33068 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33069
2025-09-01Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2025-08-31ld: Move Solaris/sparcv9 TEXT_START_ADDR to elf64_sparc_sol2.shRainer Orth3-9/+7
While looking at the Solaris versions of the program header p_vaddr and p_align values of the text and data segments, I noticed that the Solaris/sparcv9 version of TEXT_START_ADDR is defined in a shared file. Since there's a Solaris/sparcv9 specific file now (ld/emulparams/elf64_sparc_sol2.sh), it seems cleaner to move it there. Tested on {sparcv9,sparc}-sun-solaris2.11 and {sparc64,sparc}-unknown-linux-gnu. 2025-07-29 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ld: * emulparams/elf64_sparc.sh (TEXT_START_ADDR): Move ... * emulparams/elf64_sparc_sol2.sh (TEXT_START_ADDR): ... here.
2025-08-30gdbsupport: remove unecessary template on iterator_range constructorSimon Marchi1-1/+0
This is a copy-pasto. Change-Id: I947772f6a694b33e393762dbf2931ebe2031c1c5
2025-08-31Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2025-08-30gdb: fix include guard in arch/aarch64-gcs-linux.hSimon Marchi1-3/+3
Fix: $ gdb/check-include-guards.py gdb/arch/aarch64-gcs-linux.h gdb/arch/aarch64-gcs-linux.h:20: wrong symbol in ifndef Change-Id: I7586d5c22abe11501f59439df2b4a73bff7d201e
2025-08-30gdb/testsuite: run black on gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.pySimon Marchi1-1/+1
Change-Id: Ib15ecd6c03fce9d50a0121bbcb910e2fa05cc5f9
2025-08-30gdb/testsuite: remove leftover debug printSimon Marchi1-1/+0
Change-Id: Ifb1dab85891200cadb4b4f59661450a03b0c6abd
2025-08-30gdb/solib-svr4: update default debug base in svr4_solib_ops::current_sosSimon Marchi1-0/+9
Commit d33a66a31134 ("gdb/solib-svr4: fix wrong namespace id for dynamic linker") regressed test gdb.base/break-probes.exp with the native-gdbserver board: Running /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break-probes.exp ... FAIL: gdb.base/break-probes.exp: run til our library loads (the program exited) FAIL: gdb.base/break-probes.exp: call (int) foo(23) In the logs, we see this: Stopped due to shared library event: Inferior unloaded target:/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Inferior loaded target:/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 When we should see this: Stopped due to shared library event (no libraries added or removed) In the unexpected output, GDB claims that the inferior unloaded and then loaded the dynamic linker. This is obviously not true. Commit d33a66a31134 changed the svr4_same function to consider the debug bases the solibs come from. Two solibs with the same inferior address but different debug base (such as the multiple solibs representing the dynamic linker in all the namespaces) now compare unequal. That commit also introduced a mechanism to update the debug base of an existing solib (more precisely, field lm_info_svr4::debug_base) when that value becomes known. The solib for the dynamic linker view in the default namespace starts with a debug base of 0, and is then changed to have the real debug base address later on. With the particular code path taken when connecting to a remote target, nothing triggers the update of the debug base of the dynamic linker solib initially created with a debug base of 0. So when svr4_solib_ops::current_sos returns a list with an solib for the dynamic linker with the real debug base value, the core sees this as an unload and a load. This happens specifically when debuggin remotely, because, svr4_solib_ops::current_sos_direct takes the "using_xfer" branch, which doesn't do any svr4_solib_ops::default_debug_base call. In local, we don't take that branch, which leads us to a call to default_debug_base. The way I propose to fix it is to add a call to svr4_solib_ops::default_debug_base at the beginning of svr4_solib_ops::current_sos. The rationale to put it there is that if the core is requesting a fresh list of libraries, and then compare that list with what it had previously, then we better make sure that the core's list has received the debug base update, if one is needed. Change-Id: If09c5a7b3d956e18d4b9514466226267c85f12a6 Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2025-08-30Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2025-08-29GDB: doc: Document Linux AArch64 support for Guarded Control StacksThiago Jung Bauermann2-0/+86
Add NEWS entry and new sections to the "Configuration-Specific Information" and "Standard Target Features" parts of the manual. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2025-08-29GDB: aarch64-linux: Support unwinding the GCSPRThiago Jung Bauermann5-1/+297
The GCSPR is almost always updated implicitly by the hardware, so the compiler doesn't generate DWARF unwind information for it. Therefore add an unwinding function that calculates the value of the GCSPR in the previous frame based on its value in this frame. Some sanity checking is done by confirming that the calculated value is within a Guarded Control Stack memory area. This function is the same as amd64_linux_dwarf2_prev_ssp, written by Christina Schimpe to unwind Intel's SSP register. The gdb.arch/aarch64-gcs-return.exp testcase is lightly adapted from gdb.arch/amd64-shadow-stack-cmds.exp. Reviewed-By: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2025-08-29GDB: aarch64-linux: Implement GCS support in displaced steppingThiago Jung Bauermann5-5/+304
When doing displaced step on a branch and link instruction with the Guarded Control Stack enabled, it's necessary to manually push and pop the GCS entry for the function call since GDB writes a simple branch instruction rather than a branch and link instruction in the displaced step buffer. The testcase exercises GCS with displaced stepping by putting the breakpoint on the bl instruction to force GDB to copy it to the displaced stepping buffer. In this situation GDB needs to manually manage the Guarded Control Stack. Reviewed-By: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2025-08-29GDB: aarch64-linux: GCS support in Linux signalsThiago Jung Bauermann4-12/+91
The signal frame can have a GCS context, so teach GDB how to use it. Also, there's a new SEGV sigcode when the inferior does an illegal memory access in the Guarded Control Stack, so display a message when that is the case. Reviewed-By: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2025-08-29GDB, gdbserver: aarch64-linux: Initial Guarded Control Stack supportThiago Jung Bauermann21-1/+1101
Add the org.gnu.gdb.aarch64.gcs feature with the GCSPR register, and the org.gnu.gdb.aarch64.gcs.linux feature with "registers" to represent the Linux kernel ptrace and prctl knobs that enable and lock specific GCS functionality. This code supports GCS only in Linux userspace applications, so the GCSPR that is exposed is the one at EL0. Also, support for calling inferior functions is enabled by adding an implementation for the shadow_stack_push gdbarch method. If for some reason a target description contains the org.gnu.gdb.aarch64.gcs feature but not the org.gnu.gdb.aarch64.gcs.linux feature then GCS support is disabled and GDB continues the debugging session. Features that need GCS support (for example, calling inferior functions) will not work and the inferior will get a segmentation fault signal instead. There's a testcase for this scenario but it only checks the native debugging case, even though in practice this problem would only occur in remote debugging with a broken stub or gdbserver. I tested manually with a gdbserver hacked to send a broken target description and it worked as described. Testcases gdb.arch/aarch64-gcs.exp, gdb.arch/aarch64-gcs-core.exp and gdb.arch/aarch64-gcs-wrong-tdesc.exp are included to cover the added functionality. Reviewed-By: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2025-08-29gdb/objfiles: use filtered_iterator as objfile::section_iteratorSimon Marchi1-51/+8
objfile::section_iterator looks like a good candidate to be implemented with filtered_iterator. Following the enhancements to filtered_iterator in the previous patch, it's pretty straighforward. I removed the non-const version of objfile::sections, because it didn't seem useful to have the two methods returning the exact same type and value. Having just the const version achieves the same thing. Change-Id: I2f29c2fb3f95605cb816cc1ff8935c10e0496052 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-08-29gdbsupport: make filtered_iterator work with pointersSimon Marchi2-11/+65
It's currently not possible to use filtered_iterator with a pointer as the base iterator type. This patch makes it possible. The indended usage is: Foo array[12]; Foo *begin = array; Foo *end = array + ARRAY_SIZE (array); filtered_iterator<Foo *, FooFilter> (begin, end); Here are the things that needed changing: - Give filtered_iterator a constructor where the caller provides already constructed begin and end iterators. filtered_iterator currently assumes that default-constructing a BaseIterator will produce a valid "end" iterator. This is not the case if BaseIterator is a pointer. The caller needs to pass in the end of the array / region to iterate on as the end. - Typedefs of member types like wouldn't work: typedef typename BaseIterator::value_type value_type; The compiler would complain that it's not possible to apply `::` to type `BaseIterator` (aka `Foo *`). Use std::iterator_traits to fix it [1]. - Similarly, the compiler would complain about the use of `BaseIterator::operator*` in the return type of `filtered_iterator::operator*`. Fix this by using `decltype(auto)` as the return type. This lets the compiler deduce the return type from the return statement. Unlike `auto`, `decltype(auto)` perfectly preserves the "cvref-ness" of the deduced return type. If the return expression yields a `Foo &`, then the function will return a `Foo &` (which is what we want), whereas it would return a `Foo` if we used just `auto`. Improve the filtered_iterator unit tests to run the same tests but with pointers as iterators. Because the filtered_iterator objects are initialized differently in the two scenarios, I chose to copy the existing code and adapt it. It would probably be possible to add a layer of abstraction to avoid code duplication, but it would end up more complicated and messy. If we ever add a third scenario, we can revisit that. [1] https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/iterator/iterator_traits.html Change-Id: Id962ffbcd960a705a82bc5eb4808b4fe118a2761 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-08-29gdb: Enable displaced stepping with shadow stack on amd64 linux.Christina Schimpe7-3/+150
Currently, if displaced stepping is active and the single stepped instruction is a call instruction, the return address atop the stack is the address following the copied instruction. However, to allow normal program execution it has to be the address following the original instruction. Due to that reason, the return address is corrected in amd64_displaced_step_fixup and i386_displaced_step_fixup. For programs that are shadow-stack enabled we see a control-protection exception, as the address on the shadow stack does not match the address atop the stack. Fix this by correcting the shadow stack top address as well. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2025-08-29gdb, gdbarch: Introduce gdbarch method to get the shadow stack pointer.Christina Schimpe5-2/+72
This patch is required by the following commit "gdb: Enable displaced stepping with shadow stack on amd64 linux." Reviewed-By: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-08-29gdb: Implement amd64 linux shadow stack support for inferior calls.Christina Schimpe3-1/+152
This patch enables inferior calls to support Intel's Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET), which provides the shadow stack feature for the x86 architecture. Following the restriction of the linux kernel, enable inferior calls for amd64 only. Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-08-29gdb, gdbarch: Enable inferior calls for shadow stack support.Christina Schimpe4-4/+72
Inferior calls in GDB reset the current PC to the beginning of the function that is called. As no call instruction is executed the new return address needs to be pushed to the shadow stack and the shadow stack pointer needs to be updated. This commit adds a new gdbarch method to push an address on the shadow stack. The method is used to adapt the function 'call_function_by_hand_dummy' for inferior call shadow stack support. Reviewed-By: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-08-29gdb: Handle shadow stack pointer register unwinding for amd64 linux.Christina Schimpe5-0/+240
Unwind the $pl3_ssp register. We now have an updated value for the shadow stack pointer when moving up or down the frame level. Note that $pl3_ssp can become unavailable when moving to a frame before the shadow stack enablement. In the example below, shadow stack is enabled in the function 'call1'. Thus, when moving to a frame level above the function, $pl3_ssp will become unavaiable. Following the restriction of the linux kernel, implement the unwinding for amd64 linux only. Before this patch: ~~~ Breakpoint 1, call2 (j=3) at sample.c:44 44 return 42; (gdb) p $pl3_ssp $1 = (void *) 0x7ffff79ffff8 (gdb) up 55 call2 (3); (gdb) p $pl3_ssp $2 = (void *) 0x7ffff79ffff8 (gdb) up 68 call1 (43); (gdb) p $pl3_ssp $3 = (void *) 0x7ffff79ffff8 ~~~ After this patch: ~~~ Breakpoint 1, call2 (j=3) at sample.c:44 44 return 42; (gdb) p $pl3_ssp $1 = (void *) 0x7ffff79ffff8 (gdb) up 55 call2 (3); (gdb) p $pl3_ssp $2 = (void *) 0x7ffff7a00000 (gdb) up 68 call1 (43i); (gdb) p $pl3_ssp $3 = <unavailable> ~~~ As we now have an updated value for each selected frame, the return command is now enabled for shadow stack enabled programs, too. We therefore add a test for the return command and shadow stack support, and for an updated shadow stack pointer after a frame level change. Reviewed-By: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-08-29gdb: amd64 linux coredump support with shadow stack.Christina Schimpe3-4/+221
Intel's Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET) provides the shadow stack feature for the x86 architecture. This commit adds support to write and read the shadow-stack node in corefiles. This helps debugging return address violations post-mortem. The format is synced with the linux kernel commit "x86: Add PTRACE interface for shadow stack". As the linux kernel restricts shadow stack support to 64-bit, apply the fix for amd64 only. Co-Authored-By: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> --- The code and testcase are lightly adapted from: [PATCH v3 5/9] GDB, gdbserver: aarch64-linux: Initial Guarded Control Stack support https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2025-June/218892.html
2025-08-29gdb, gdbserver: Add support of Intel shadow stack pointer register.Christina Schimpe30-142/+613
This patch adds the user mode register PL3_SSP which is part of the Intel(R) Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET) feature for support of shadow stack. For now, only native and remote debugging support for shadow stack userspace on amd64 linux are covered by this patch including 64 bit and x32 support. 32 bit support is not covered due to missing Linux kernel support. This patch requires fixing the test gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind which is failing in case the shadow stack pointer is unavailable. Such a state is possible if shadow stack is disabled for the current thread but supported by HW. This test uses the Python unwinder inline-frame-cycle-unwind.py which fakes the cyclic stack cycle by reading the pending frame's registers and adding them to the unwinder: ~~~ for reg in pending_frame.architecture().registers("general"): val = pending_frame.read_register(reg) unwinder.add_saved_register(reg, val) return unwinder ~~~ However, in case the python unwinder is used we add a register (pl3_ssp) that is unavailable. This leads to a NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR caught in gdb/frame-unwind.c:frame_unwind_try_unwinder and it is continued with standard unwinders. This destroys the faked cyclic behavior and the stack is further unwinded after frame 5. In the working scenario an error should be triggered: ~~~ bt 0 inline_func () at /tmp/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:49^M 1 normal_func () at /tmp/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:32^M 2 0x000055555555516e in inline_func () at /tmp/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:45^M 3 normal_func () at /tmp/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:32^M 4 0x000055555555516e in inline_func () at /tmp/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:45^M 5 normal_func () at /tmp/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:32^M Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 5: backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 5 ~~~ To fix the Python unwinder, we simply skip the unavailable registers. Also it makes the test gdb.dap/scopes.exp fail. The shadow stack feature is disabled by default, so the pl3_ssp register which is added with my CET shadow stack series will be shown as unavailable and we see a TCL error: ~~ >>> {"seq": 12, "type": "request", "command": "variables", "arguments": {"variablesReference": 2, "count": 85}} Content-Length: 129^M ^M {"request_seq": 12, "type": "response", "command": "variables", "success": false, "message": "value is not available", "seq": 25}FAIL: gdb.dap/scopes.exp: fetch all registers success ERROR: tcl error sourcing /tmp/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dap/scopes.exp. ERROR: tcl error code TCL LOOKUP DICT body ERROR: key "body" not known in dictionary while executing "dict get $val body variables" (file "/tmp/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dap/scopes.exp" line 152) invoked from within "source /tmp/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dap/scopes.exp" ("uplevel" body line 1) invoked from within "uplevel #0 source /tmp/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dap/scopes.exp" invoked from within "catch "uplevel #0 source $test_file_name" msg" UNRESOLVED: gdb.dap/scopes.exp: testcase '/tmp/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dap/scopes.exp' aborted due to Tcl error ~~ I am fixing this by enabling the test for CET shadow stack, in case we detect that the HW supports it: ~~~ # If x86 shadow stack is supported we need to configure GLIBC_TUNABLES # such that the feature is enabled and the register pl3_ssp is # available. Otherwise the reqeust to fetch all registers will fail # with "message": "value is not available". if { [allow_ssp_tests] } { append_environment GLIBC_TUNABLES "glibc.cpu.hwcaps" "SHSTK" } ~~~ Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-08-29gdb, gdbserver: Use xstate_bv for target description creation on x86.Christina Schimpe22-156/+197
The XSAVE function set is organized in state components, which are a set of registers or parts of registers. So-called XSAVE-supported features are organized using state-component bitmaps, each bit corresponding to a single state component. The Intel Software Developer's Manual uses the term xstate_bv for a state-component bitmap, which is defined as XCR0 | IA32_XSS. The control register XCR0 only contains a state-component bitmap that specifies user state components, while IA32_XSS contains a state-component bitmap that specifies supervisor state components. Until now, XCR0 is used as input for target description creation in GDB. However, a following patch will add userspace support for the CET shadow stack feature by Intel. The CET state is configured in IA32_XSS and consists of 2 state components: - State component 11 used for the 2 MSRs controlling user-mode functionality for CET (CET_U state) - State component 12 used for the 3 MSRs containing shadow-stack pointers for privilege levels 0-2 (CET_S state). Reading the CET shadow stack pointer register on linux requires a separate ptrace call using NT_X86_SHSTK. To pass the CET shadow stack enablement state we would like to pass the xstate_bv value instead of xcr0 for target description creation. To prepare for that, we rename the xcr0 mask values for target description creation to xstate_bv. However, this patch doesn't add any functional changes in GDB. Future states specified in IA32_XSS such as CET will create a combined xstate_bv_mask including xcr0 register value and its corresponding bit in the state component bitmap. This combined mask will then be used to create the target descriptions. Reviewed-By: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2025-08-29gdb: Sync up x86-gcc-cpuid.h with cpuid.h from gcc 14 branch.Christina Schimpe1-31/+122
This is required for a later commit which requires "bit_SHSTK". Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2025-08-29gdbserver: Add assert in x86_linux_read_description.Christina Schimpe1-1/+6
On x86 the PTRACE_GETREGSET request is currently only used for the xstate regset. The size of the xstate regset is initialized to 0 such that it can be reset to the appropriate size once we know it is supported for the current target in x86_linux_read_description. However, this configuration would not just affect the xstate regset but any regset with PTRACE_GETREGSET request that is added in the future. The new regset would be misconfigured with the xstate regset size. To avoid this we add an assert for unsupported regsets and check explicitly for the note type of the register set. Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2025-08-29gdbserver: Add optional runtime register set type.Christina Schimpe2-15/+42
Some register sets can be activated and deactivated by the OS during the runtime of a process. One example register is the Intel CET shadow stack pointer. This patch adds a new type of register set to handle such cases. We shouldn't deactivate these regsets and should not show a warning if the register set is not active but supported by the kernel. However, it is safe to deactivate them, if they are unsupported by the kernel. To differentiate those scenarios we can use the errno returned by the ptrace call. Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
2025-08-29gdb, testsuite: Extend core_find procedure to save program output.Christina Schimpe1-2/+8
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> The change comes from ARM's GCS series: [PATCH v3 5/9] GDB, gdbserver: aarch64-linux: Initial Guarded Control Stack support. We need it for testing coredump files, too. So include it in this patch series. Abridged-by: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com> Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> --- This is the patch mentioned above: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2025-June/218892.html Minus everything except for the change in gdb.exp's corefind procedure.
2025-08-29gdb/objfiles: make objfile::sections yield referencesSimon Marchi21-149/+149
I wrote this as a preparatory patch while attempting to make objfile::section_iterator use filtered_iterator. It turned out not so easy, so I have put it aside for now. But now I have this patch, so I thought I'd send it by itself. Since the `obj_section *` yielded by the iterator can't be nullptr, I think it makes sense for the iterator to yield references instead. Just like you would get if you iterated on an std::vector<obj_section>. Change-Id: I7bbee50ed52599e64c4f3b06bdbbde597feba9aa
2025-08-29[gdb/testsuite] Fix overlapping CUs in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-linkage-name-trust.expTom de Vries1-1/+1
When running test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-linkage-name-trust.exp with target board cc-with-gdb-index, I get: ... (gdb) file dw2-linkage-name-trust^M Reading symbols from dw2-linkage-name-trust...^M warning: .gdb_index address table has a range (0x4006ac - 0x4006cc) that \ overlaps with an earlier range, ignoring .gdb_index^M (gdb) delete breakpoints^M ... Fix this by compiling with nodebug. Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR testsuite/33315 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
2025-08-29[gdb/testsuite] Fix overlapping CUs in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-entry-points.expTom de Vries2-3/+21
When running test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-entry-points.exp with target board cc-with-gdb-index, I get: ... (gdb) file dw2-entry-points^M Reading symbols from dw2-entry-points...^M warning: .gdb_index address table has a range (0x40066c - 0x4006e4) that \ overlaps with an earlier range, ignoring .gdb_index^M (gdb) delete breakpoints^M ... Fix this by copying function bar_helper to barso_helper, and using it where appropriate. Tested on aarch64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR testsuite/33315 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
2025-08-29gdb: use kill() in gdbpy_interrupt for hosts with signal supportAndrew Burgess2-24/+68
For background, see this thread: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20250612144607.27507-1-tdevries@suse.de Tom describes the issue clearly in the above thread, here's what he said: Once in a while, when running test-case gdb.base/bp-cmds-continue-ctrl-c.exp, I run into: ... Breakpoint 2, foo () at bp-cmds-continue-ctrl-c.c:23^M 23 usleep (100);^M ^CFAIL: $exp: run: stop with control-c (unexpected) (timeout) FAIL: $exp: run: stop with control-c ... This is PR python/32167, observed both on x86_64-linux and powerpc64le-linux. This is not a timeout due to accidental slowness, gdb actually hangs. The backtrace at the hang is (on cfarm120 running AlmaLinux 9.6): ... (gdb) bt #0 0x00007fffbca9dd94 in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib64/glibc-hwcaps/power10/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007fffbcaa6ddc in pthread_mutex_lock@@GLIBC_2.17 () from /lib64/glibc-hwcaps/power10/libc.so.6 #2 0x000000001067aee8 in __gthread_mutex_lock () at /usr/include/c++/11/ppc64le-redhat-linux/bits/gthr-default.h:749 #3 0x000000001067afc8 in __gthread_recursive_mutex_lock () at /usr/include/c++/11/ppc64le-redhat-linux/bits/gthr-default.h:811 #4 0x000000001067b0d4 in std::recursive_mutex::lock () at /usr/include/c++/11/mutex:108 #5 0x000000001067b380 in std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex>::lock_guard () at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/std_mutex.h:229 #6 0x0000000010679d3c in set_quit_flag () at gdb/extension.c:865 #7 0x000000001066b6dc in handle_sigint () at gdb/event-top.c:1264 #8 0x00000000109e3b3c in handler_wrapper () at gdb/posix-hdep.c:70 #9 <signal handler called> #10 0x00007fffbcaa6d14 in pthread_mutex_lock@@GLIBC_2.17 () from /lib64/glibc-hwcaps/power10/libc.so.6 #11 0x000000001067aee8 in __gthread_mutex_lock () at /usr/include/c++/11/ppc64le-redhat-linux/bits/gthr-default.h:749 #12 0x000000001067afc8 in __gthread_recursive_mutex_lock () at /usr/include/c++/11/ppc64le-redhat-linux/bits/gthr-default.h:811 #13 0x000000001067b0d4 in std::recursive_mutex::lock () at /usr/include/c++/11/mutex:108 #14 0x000000001067b380 in std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex>::lock_guard () at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/std_mutex.h:229 #15 0x00000000106799cc in set_active_ext_lang () at gdb/extension.c:775 #16 0x0000000010b287ac in gdbpy_enter::gdbpy_enter () at gdb/python/python.c:232 #17 0x0000000010a8e3f8 in bpfinishpy_handle_stop () at gdb/python/py-finishbreakpoint.c:414 ... What happens here is the following: - the gdbpy_enter constructor attempts to set the current extension language to python using set_active_ext_lang - set_active_ext_lang attempts to lock ext_lang_mutex - while doing so, it is interrupted by sigint_wrapper (the SIGINT handler), handling a SIGINT - sigint_wrapper calls handle_sigint, which calls set_quit_flag, which also tries to lock ext_lang_mutex - since std::recursive_mutex::lock is not async-signal-safe, things go wrong, resulting in a hang. The hang bisects to commit 8bb8f834672 ("Fix gdb.interrupt race"), which introduced the lock, making PR python/32167 a regression since gdb 15.1. Commit 8bb8f834672 fixes PR dap/31263, a race reported by ThreadSanitizer: ... WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=615372) Read of size 1 at 0x00000328064c by thread T19: #0 set_active_ext_lang(extension_language_defn const*) gdb/extension.c:755 #1 scoped_disable_cooperative_sigint_handling::scoped_disable_cooperative_sigint_handling() gdb/extension.c:697 #2 gdbpy_interrupt gdb/python/python.c:1106 #3 cfunction_vectorcall_NOARGS <null> Previous write of size 1 at 0x00000328064c by main thread: #0 scoped_disable_cooperative_sigint_handling::scoped_disable_cooperative_sigint_handling() gdb/extension.c:704 #1 fetch_inferior_event() gdb/infrun.c:4591 ... Location is global 'cooperative_sigint_handling_disabled' of size 1 at 0x00000328064c ... SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race gdb/extension.c:755 in \ set_active_ext_lang(extension_language_defn const*) ... The problem here is that gdb.interrupt is called from a worker thread, and its implementation, gdbpy_interrupt races with the main thread on some variable. The fix presented here is based on the fix that Tom proposed, but fills in the missing Mingw support. The problem is basically split into two: hosts that support unix like signals, and Mingw, which doesn't support signals. For signal supporting hosts, I've adopted the approach that Tom suggests, gdbpy_interrupt uses kill() to send SIGINT to the GDB process. This is then handled in the main thread as if the user had pressed Ctrl+C. For these hosts no locking is required, so the existing lock is removed. However, everywhere the lock currently exists I've added an assert: gdb_assert (is_main_thread ()); If this assert ever triggers then we're setting or reading the quit flag on a worker thread, this will be a problem without the mutex. For Mingw, the current mutex is retained. This is fine as there are no signals, so no chance of the mutex acquisition being interrupted by a signal, and so, deadlock shouldn't be an issue. To manage the complexity of when we need an assert, and when we need the mutex, I've created 'struct ext_lang_guard', which can be used as a RAII object. This object either performs the assertion check, or acquires the mutex, depending on the host. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32167 Co-Authored-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-08-29readelf: Add --got-contents optionH.J. Lu19-215/+1378
Add --got-contents option to readelf, inspired by the -G option on Solaris, to display contents of GOT sections: $ readelf --got-contents libfoo.so Global Offset Table '.got' contains 1 entry: Index: Address Reloc Sym. Name + Addend/Value 0: 000000200340 R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT foo + 0 Global Offset Table '.got.plt' contains 4 entries: Index: Address Reloc Sym. Name + Addend/Value 0: 000000200348 200220 1: 000000200350 0 2: 000000200358 0 3: 000000200360 R_X86_64_JUMP_SLO bar + 0 When --got-content options are used: 1. Allocate an array, all_relocations, to hold all relocations. 2. Update dump_relr_relocations and dump_relocations to scan relocations and cache them in all_relocations. Don't display relocations if not requested. 3. Add process_got_section_contents to display contents of GOT sections by matching the GOT entry offset against the cached relocations. 4. Update process_mips_specific to only display the GOT related contents for --got-contents. binutils/ * NEWS: Mention "readelf --got-contents". * readelf.c (do_got_section_contents): New. (elf_relocation): Likewise. (all_relocations_root): Likewise. (all_relocations): Likewise. (all_relocations_count): Likewise. (update_all_relocations): Likewise. (dump_relr_relocations): Add a bool argument to indicate if relocations should be displayed. Populate all_relocations if do_got_section_contents is true. (dump_relocations): Likewise. (long_option_values): Add OPTION_GOT_CONTENTS. (options): Add --got-contents. (usage): Show --got-contents. (parse_args): Support --got-contents. (display_relocations): Add a bool argument, dump_reloc, to indicate if relocations should be displayed. Call update_all_relocations. Pass dump_reloc to dump_relr_relocations and dump_relocations. (process_relocs): Check do_got_section_contents. Handle do_got_section_contents for dynamic relocations. (process_section_contents): Pass true to display_relocations. (process_mips_specific): Add a bool argument, dump_got, to indicate if only the GOT related contents should be displayed. Display all MIPS specific information if dump_got is false. (elf_relocation_cmp): New. (display_elf_relocation_at): Likewise. (process_got_section_contents): Likewise. (process_object): Call process_got_section_contents. * doc/binutils.texi: Document --got-contents. ld/ * testsuite/ld-i386/binutils.exp: New file. * testsuite/ld-i386/got-1.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-i386/libgot-1a.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-i386/libgot-1b.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-i386/libgot-1c.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-i386/libgot-1d.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/binutils.exp: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/got-1.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/libgot-1a-x32.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/libgot-1a.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/libgot-1b-x32.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/libgot-1b.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/libgot-1c-x32.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/libgot-1c.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/libgot-1d-x32.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/libgot-1d.rd: Likewise. Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
2025-08-29ld: drop bogus %F format modifiersJan Beulich2-4/+4
Support for %F was dropped in 6d74c1f313df ("PR 32603 followup, remove %F from einfo").
2025-08-29x86: add "udb" opcode (permanent official #UD in 64-bit mode)H. Peter Anvin (Intel)6-2190/+2211
The opcode D6 has been officially reserved as a single-byte permanent undefined (#UD) opcode in 64-bit mode with the mnemonic UDB. This is already the behavior of all known 64-bit implementations; this is thus merely an official statement of forward compatibility and the assignment of a mnemonic. This will be documented in the next version of the Intel Software Developer's Manual; in the meantime I DO speak officially for Intel on this issue. The x86 Advisory Council has ratified this decision, and so it is expected to be honored across vendors, but I obviously cannot make any official statement on any other vendor's behalf. I am covered by the Intel-FSF copyright assignment for binutils. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
2025-08-29Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2025-08-28gdb/gdb-gdb.gdb.in: skip gdb::ref_ptr<.*>::getSimon Marchi1-0/+3
I think it's uninteresting to step into gdb::ref_ptr::get, so add a skip entry for it. I am adding just one to get the party started, but there are certainly more like this that we could skip. Change-Id: Ib074535c96a62137de63bbe58ff168a1e913688f Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-08-28gdb/testsuite: use gdb_test_no_output when dumping in gdb.base/dump.expSimon Marchi1-8/+1
I don't know if this is true on all platforms, but from what I can see on Linux, the dump commands don't output anything. Use gdb_test_no_output, which should be a bit more robust than checking for some specific error patterns. Change-Id: Idc82298c4752ba7808659dfea2f8324c8a97052d Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-08-28Fix documentation of -list-[target-]features resultsChristian Walther1-2/+2
The manual claims that the -list-features and -list-target-features MI commands return their result in a field named "result". The field is actually named "features", and always has been since the introduction of these commands in 084344d and c6ebd6c. See mi_cmd_list_features and mi_cmd_list_target_features in gdb/mi/mi-main.c. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-08-28testsuite: add untested in case OS corefile is not foundChristina Schimpe7-0/+7
Even though the core_find proc will log a warning, it's better to log "untested" and then terminate the test. This will help to avoid silently skipped tests, when running the testsuite. Most of the tests already do that. This patch adds the missing ones. Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com>
2025-08-28Bump flake8 versionTom Tromey1-1/+1
"pre-commit autoupdate" pointed out that a newer version of flake8 has been released. This patch applies the update. No code changes were needed. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-08-28gdb/python: check return from final PyObject_New in py-disasm.cAndrew Burgess1-44/+41
In this commit: commit dbd05b9edcf760a7001985f89bc760358a3c19d7 Date: Wed Aug 20 10:45:09 2025 +0100 gdb/python: check return value of PyObject_New in all cases I missed a call to PyObject_New in python/py-disasm.c, which this commit addresses. Unlike the previous commit, the call to PyObject_New in py-disasm.c is contained within the scoped_disasm_info_object class, which makes it harder to check for NULL and return. So in this commit I've rewritten the scoped_disasm_info_object class, moving the call to PyObject_New out into gdbpy_print_insn, which is the only place that scoped_disasm_info_object was being used. As scoped_disasm_info_object is no longer responsible for creating the underlying Python object, I figured that I might as well move the initialisation of that object out of scoped_disasm_info_object too. With that done, the scoped_disasm_info_object now has just one task, invalidating the existing disasm_info_object at the end of the scope. So I renamed scoped_disasm_info_object to scoped_invalidate_disasm_info, which reflects its only task. I made a couple of other small adjustments that were requested during review, these are both in the same code area: updating disasm_info_fill to take an object reference rather than a pointer, and removing the local variable insn_disas_obj from gdbpy_print_insn, and inline its value at the one place it was used. There should be no user visible changes after this commit. Except for the PyObject_New call, which now has proper error checking. But in the working case, nothing should have changed. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-08-28gdb/objfiles: add comment explaining when obj_section::the_bfd_section is ↵Simon Marchi1-1/+3
nullptr Change-Id: Iae17492f468efba7b76463a6ff8526171e412040 Reviewed-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2025-08-28[gdb/testsuite] Use build_executable in gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.expTom de Vries1-4/+2
While looking at test-case gdb.tui/tui-missing-src.exp I noticed that gdb_compile is used to compile multiple sources: ... if { [gdb_compile "${srcfiles}" "${binfile}" \ executable {debug additional_flags=-O0}] != "" } { ... meaning there are no separate compile and link steps, as is required for fission [1]. Fix this by using build_executable instead. Tested on aarch64-linux. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebugFission
2025-08-28gdb/record: Support wfi, sfence.vma, sret and mret instructions in risc-vtimurgol0071-11/+45
During testing of bare-metal applications on QEMU for RISC-V, it was discovered that the instructions wfi, sfence.vma, sret, and mret were not supported. This patch introduces support for these instructions. Additionally, it wraps fetch_instruction function in a try-catch block to gracefully handle errors that may occur when attempting to read invalid address. Reviewed-By: Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-08-28[gdb/testsuite] Fix require dwarf2_support check in some test-cases, some moreTom de Vries6-2/+10
The Linaro CI reported a regression in test-case gdb.dwarf2/macro-source-path-clang14-dw4.exp due to recent commit 81e5a23c7b8 ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix require dwarf2_support check in some test-cases"). The problem is that the "require dwarf2_support" in its new location doesn't work because proc dwarf2_support is not defined. I didn't notice this because I tested all gdb.dwarf2 test-cases together, and a different test-case had already imported the proc. Fix this by moving load_lib dwarf.exp earlier. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2025-08-27readelf: Update "-D -r" to dump DT_RELRH.J. Lu9-46/+222
1. Update dump_relr_relocations to take relr_size, relr_entsize and relr_offset, instead of a pointer to Elf_Internal_Shdr, as function arguments. 2. Update process_relocs to call dump_relr_relocations if relocation type is reltype_relr. binutils/ PR binutils/33328 * readelf.c (dump_relr_relocations): Replace a pointer to Elf_Internal_Shdr argument with relr_size, relr_entsize and relr_offset. (display_relocations): Update the dump_relr_relocations call. (process_relocs): Call dump_relr_relocations if relocation type is reltype_relr. ld/ PR binutils/33328 * testsuite/ld-i386/dt-relr-1c.d: New file. * testsuite/ld-i386/dt-relr-1d.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/dt-relr-1c-x32.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/dt-relr-1c.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/dt-relr-1d-x32.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/dt-relr-1d.d: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Run PR binutils/33328 tests. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Likewise. Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>