| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Moving it to an inner scope makes it clearer where it's used (only while
handling the TARGET_WAITKIND_LOADED event).
gdb/ChangeLog:
* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Move stop_soon variable to
inner scope.
Change-Id: Ic57685a21714cfbb38f1487ee96cea1d12b44652
|
|
gas/
* doc/c-s390.texi: Document vector instruction formats.
|
|
This does exactly the same as making decisions based on an override
in _bfd_elf_add_default_symbol, and is simpler.
PR 27311
* elflink.c (_bfd_elf_add_default_symbol): Revert last two changes.
(elf_link_add_object_symbols): Here too. Don't pull in as-needed
libraries when H is an indirect symbol after calling
_bfd_elf_add_default_symbol.
|
|
PR 27270
PR 27284
PR 26945
* ar.c: Don't include libbfd.h.
(write_archive): Replace xmalloc+strcpy with xstrdup. Use
bfd_stat rather than fstat on iostream. Move stat and fd tests
outside of _WIN32 ifdef. Delete skip_stat variable.
* arsup.c (temp_name, real_ofd): New static variables.
(ar_open): Use make_tempname and bfd_fdopenw.
(ar_save): Adjust to suit ar_open changes. Move stat output
of _WIN32 ifdef.
* objcopy.c: Don't include libbfd.h.
(copy_file): Use bfd_stat.
|
|
bfd/
PR 27311
* elflink.c (_bfd_elf_add_default_symbol): Clear override when
undecorated symbol will have a different version.
ld/
* testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc.exp (libpr16467b.so, libpr16467bn.so):
Link with --as-needed.
|
|
This adds a testcase that exercises detaching while GDB is stepping
over a breakpoint, in all combinations of:
- maint target non-stop off/on
- set non-stop on/off
- displaced stepping on/off
This exercises the bugs fixed in the previous 8 patches.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.threads/detach-step-over.c: New file.
* gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp: New file.
|
|
A following patch will add a testcase that has a number of threads
constantly stepping over a breakpoint, and then has GDB detach the
process, while threads are running. If we have more than one inferior
running, and we detach from just one of the inferiors, we expect that
the remaining inferior continues running. However, in all-stop, if
GDB needs to pause the target for the detach, nothing is re-resuming
the other inferiors after the detach. "info threads" shows the
threads as running, but they really aren't. This fixes it.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* infcmd.c (detach_command): Hold strong reference to target, and
if all-stop on entry, restart threads on exit.
* infrun.c (switch_back_to_stepped_thread): Factor out bits to ...
(restart_stepped_thread): ... this new function. Also handle
trap_expected.
(restart_after_all_stop_detach): New function.
* infrun.h (restart_after_all_stop_detach): Declare.
|
|
A following patch will add a testcase that has a number of threads
constantly stepping over a breakpoint, and then has GDB detach the
process. That testcase exercises both "set displaced-stepping
on/off". Testing with "set displaced-stepping off" reveals that GDB
does not handle the case of the user typing "detach" just while some
thread is in the middle of an in-line step over. If that thread
belongs to the inferior that is being detached, then the step-over
never finishes, and threads of other inferiors are never re-resumed.
This fixes it.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* infrun.c (struct step_over_info): Initialize fields.
(prepare_for_detach): Handle ongoing in-line step over.
|
|
A following patch will add a testcase that has a number of threads
constantly stepping over a breakpoint, and then has GDB detach the
process. That testcase sometimes fails with the inferior crashing
with SIGTRAP after the detach because of the bug fixed by this patch,
when tested with the native target.
The problem is that target_detach removes breakpoints from the target
immediately, and that does not work with the native GNU/Linux target
(and probably no other native target) currently. The test wouldn't
fail with this issue when testing against gdbserver, because gdbserver
does allow accessing memory while the current thread is running, by
transparently pausing all threads temporarily, without GDB noticing.
Implementing that in gdbserver was a lot of work, so I'm not looking
forward right now to do the same in the native target. Instead, I
came up with a simpler solution -- push the breakpoints removal down
to the targets. The Linux target conveniently already pauses all
threads before detaching them, since PTRACE_DETACH only works with
stopped threads, so we move removing breakpoints to after that. Only
the remote and GNU/Linux targets support support async execution, so
no other target should really need this.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* linux-nat.c (linux_nat_target::detach): Remove breakpoints
here...
* remote.c (remote_target::remote_detach_1): ... and here ...
* target.c (target_detach): ... instead of here.
* target.h (target_ops::detach): Add comment.
|
|
I noticed that "detach" while a program was running sometimes resulted
in the process crashing. I tracked it down to this change to
prepare_for_detach in commit 187b041e ("gdb: move displaced stepping
logic to gdbarch, allow starting concurrent displaced steps"):
/* Is any thread of this process displaced stepping? If not,
there's nothing else to do. */
- if (displaced->step_thread == nullptr)
+ if (displaced_step_in_progress (inf))
return;
The problem above is that the condition was inadvertently flipped. It
should have been:
if (!displaced_step_in_progress (inf))
So I fixed it, and wrote a testcase to exercise it. The testcase has
a number of threads constantly stepping over a breakpoint, and then
GDB detaches the process, while threads are running and stepping over
the breakpoint. And then I was surprised that my testcase would hang
-- GDB would get stuck in an infinite loop in prepare_for_detach,
here:
while (displaced_step_in_progress (inf))
{
...
What is going on is that since we now have two displaced stepping
buffers, as one displaced step finishes, GDB starts another, and
there's another one already in progress, and on and on, so the
displaced_step_in_progress condition never turns false. This happens
because we go via the whole handle_inferior_event, which tries to
start new step overs when one finishes. And also because while we
remove breakpoints from the target before prepare_for_detach is
called, handle_inferior_event ends up calling insert_breakpoints via
e.g. keep_going.
Thinking through all this, I came to the conclusion that going through
the whole handle_inferior_event isn't ideal. A _lot_ is done by that
function, e.g., some thread may get a signal which is passed to the
inferior, and gdb decides to try to get over the signal handler, which
reinstalls breakpoints. Or some process may exit. We can end up
reporting these events via normal_stop while detaching, maybe end up
running some breakpoint commands, or maybe even something runs an
inferior function call. Etc. All this after the user has already
declared they don't want to debug the process anymore, by asking to
detach.
I came to the conclusion that it's better to do the minimal amount of
work possible, in a more controlled fashion, without going through
handle_inferior_event. So in the new approach implemented by this
patch, if there are threads of the inferior that we're detaching in
the middle of a displaced step, stop them, and cancel the displaced
step. This is basically what stop_all_threads already does, via
wait_one and (the now factored out) handle_one, so I'm reusing those.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* infrun.c (struct wait_one_event): Move higher up.
(prepare_for_detach): Abort in-progress displaced steps instead of
letting them complete.
(handle_one): If the inferior is detaching, don't add the thread
back to the global step-over chain.
(restart_threads): Don't restart threads if detaching.
(handle_signal_stop): Remove inferior::detaching reference.
|
|
After detaching from a process, the inf->detaching flag is
inadvertently left set to true. If you afterwards reuse the same
inferior to start a new process, GDB will mishave...
The problem is that prepare_for_detach discards the scoped_restore at
the end, while the intention is for the flag to be set only for the
duration of prepare_for_detach.
This was already a bug in the original commit that added
prepare_for_detach, commit 24291992dac3 ("PR gdb/11321"), by yours
truly. Back then, we still used cleanups, and the function called
discard_cleanups instead of do_cleanups, by mistake.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* infrun.c (prepare_for_detach): Don't release scoped_restore
before returning.
|
|
This moves the code handling an event out of wait_one to a separate
function, to be used in another context in a following patch.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* infrun.c (handle_one): New function, factored out from ...
(stop_all_threads): ... here.
|
|
A following patch will add a new testcase that has two processes, each
with a number of threads constantly tripping a breakpoint and stepping
over it, because the breakpoint has a condition that evals false.
Then GDB detaches from one of the processes, while both processes are
running. And then the testcase sends a SIGUSR1 to the other process.
When run against gdbserver, that would occasionaly fail like this:
(gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/detach-step-over.exp: iter 1: detach
Executing on target: kill -SIGUSR1 208303 (timeout = 300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP kill -SIGUSR1 208303
Thread 2.5 "detach-step-ove" received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
[Switching to Thread 208303.208305]
0x000055555555522a in thread_func (arg=0x0) at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/detach-step-over.c:54
54 counter++; /* Set breakpoint here. */
What happened was that GDBserver is doing a step-over for process A
when a detach request for process B arrives. And that generates a
spurious SIGTRAP report for process A, as seen above.
The GDBserver logs reveal what happened:
- GDB manages to detach while a step over is in progress. That reaches
linux_process_target::complete_ongoing_step_over(), which does:
/* Passing NULL_PTID as filter indicates we want all events to
be left pending. Eventually this returns when there are no
unwaited-for children left. */
ret = wait_for_event_filtered (minus_one_ptid, null_ptid, &wstat,
__WALL);
As the comment say, this leaves all events pending, _including_ the
just finished step SIGTRAP. We never discard that SIGTRAP. So
GDBserver reports the SIGTRAP to GDB. GDB can't explain the
SIGTRAP, so it reports it to the user.
The GDBserver log looks like this. The LWP of interest is 208305:
Need step over [LWP 208305]? yes, found breakpoint at 0x555555555227
proceed_all_lwps: found thread 208305 needing a step-over
Starting step-over on LWP 208305. Stopping all threads
208305 starts a step-over.
>>>> entering void linux_process_target::stop_all_lwps(int, lwp_info*)
stop_all_lwps (stop-and-suspend, except=LWP 208303.208305)
Sending sigstop to lwp 208303
Sending sigstop to lwp 207755
wait_for_sigstop: pulling events
LWFE: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 207755, ERRNO-OK
LLW: waitpid 207755 received Stopped (signal) (stopped)
pc is 0x7f7e045593bf
Expected stop.
LLW: SIGSTOP caught for LWP 207755.207755 while stopping threads.
LWFE: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 208303, ERRNO-OK
LLW: waitpid 208303 received Stopped (signal) (stopped)
pc is 0x7ffff7e743bf
Expected stop.
LLW: SIGSTOP caught for LWP 208303.208303 while stopping threads.
LWFE: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, ERRNO-OK
leader_pid=208303, leader_lp!=NULL=1, num_lwps=11, zombie=0
leader_pid=207755, leader_lp!=NULL=1, num_lwps=11, zombie=0
LLW: exit (no unwaited-for LWP)
stop_all_lwps done, setting stopping_threads back to !stopping
<<<< exiting void linux_process_target::stop_all_lwps(int, lwp_info*)
Done stopping all threads for step-over.
pc is 0x555555555227
Writing 8b to 0x555555555227 in process 208305
Could not findsigchld_handler
fast tracepoint jump at 0x555555555227 in list (uninserting).
pending reinsert at 0x555555555227
step from pc 0x555555555227
Resuming lwp 208305 (step, signal 0, stop expected)
<<<< exiting ptid_t linux_process_target::wait_1(ptid_t, target_waitstatus*, target_wait_flags)
handling possible serial event
getpkt ("D;32b8b"); [no ack sent]
The detach request arrives.
sigchld_handler
Tracing is already off, ignoring
detach: step over in progress, finish it first
GDBserver realizes a step over for 208305 was in progress, let's it
finish.
LWFE: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 208305, ERRNO-OK
LLW: waitpid 208305 received Stopped (signal) (stopped)
pc is 0x555555555227
Expected stop.
LLW: step LWP 208303.208305, 0, 0 (discard delayed SIGSTOP)
pending reinsert at 0x555555555227
step from pc 0x555555555227
Resuming lwp 208305 (step, signal 0, stop not expected)
LWFE: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, ERRNO-OK
leader_pid=208303, leader_lp!=NULL=1, num_lwps=11, zombie=0
leader_pid=207755, leader_lp!=NULL=1, num_lwps=11, zombie=0
sigsuspend'ing
LWFE: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 208305, ERRNO-OK
LLW: waitpid 208305 received Trace/breakpoint trap (stopped)
pc is 0x55555555522a
CSBB: LWP 208303.208305 stopped by trace
LWFE: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, ERRNO-OK
leader_pid=208303, leader_lp!=NULL=1, num_lwps=11, zombie=0
leader_pid=207755, leader_lp!=NULL=1, num_lwps=11, zombie=0
LLW: exit (no unwaited-for LWP)
Finished step over.
The step-over for 208305 finishes.
Writing cc to 0x555555555227 in process 208305
Could not find fast tracepoint jump at 0x555555555227 in list (reinserting).
>>>> entering void linux_process_target::stop_all_lwps(int, lwp_info*)
stop_all_lwps (stop, except=none)
wait_for_sigstop: pulling events
The detach proceeds (snipped).
...
proceed_one_lwp: lwp 208305
LWP 208305 has pending status, leaving stopped
Later on, 208305 has a pending status (the step SIGTRAP from the
step-over), so GDBserver starts the process of reporting it.
...
wait_1 ret = LWP 208303.208305, 1, 5
<<<< exiting ptid_t linux_process_target::wait_1(ptid_t, target_waitstatus*, target_wait_flags)
...
and eventually GDB receives the stop notification (T05 == SIGTRAP):
getpkt ("vStopped"); [no ack sent]
sigchld_handler
vStopped: acking 3
Writing resume reply for LWP 208303.208305:1
putpkt ("$T0506:f0ee58f7ff7f0* ;07:f0ee58f7ff7f0* ;10:2a525*"550* ;thread:p32daf.32db1;core:c;#37"); [noack mode]
From the GDB side, we see:
[infrun] fetch_inferior_event: enter
[infrun] fetch_inferior_event: fetch_inferior_event enter
[infrun] do_target_wait: Found 2 inferiors, starting at #1
[infrun] print_target_wait_results: target_wait (-1.0.0 [process -1], status) =
[infrun] print_target_wait_results: 208303.208305.0 [Thread 208303.208305],
[infrun] print_target_wait_results: status->kind = stopped, signal = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP
[infrun] handle_inferior_event: status->kind = stopped, signal = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP
[infrun] start_step_over: enter
[infrun] start_step_over: stealing global queue of threads to step, length = 6
[infrun] operator(): putting back 6 threads to step in global queue
[infrun] start_step_over: exit
[infrun] handle_signal_stop: context switch
[infrun] context_switch: Switching context from process 0 to Thread 208303.208305
[infrun] handle_signal_stop: stop_pc=0x55555555522a
[infrun] handle_signal_stop: random signal (GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP)
[infrun] stop_waiting: stop_waiting
[infrun] stop_all_threads: starting
The fix is to discard the step SIGTRAP, unless GDB wanted the thread
to step.
gdbserver/ChangeLog:
* linux-low.cc (linux_process_target::complete_ongoing_step_over):
Discard step SIGTRAP, unless GDB wanted the thread to step.
|
|
A following patch will add a testcase that has two processes with
threads stepping over a breakpoint continuously, and then detaches
from one of the processes while threads are running. The other
process continues stepping over its breakpoint. And then the testcase
sends a SIGUSR1, expecting that GDB reports it. That would sometimes
hang against gdbserver, due to the bugs fixed here. Both bugs are
related, in that they're about remote protocol asynchronous Stop
notifications. There's a bug in GDB, and another in GDBserver.
The GDB bug:
- when we detach from a process, the remote target discards any
pending RSP notification related to that process, including the
in-flight, yet-unacked notification. Discarding the in-flight
notification is the problem. Until the in-flight notification is
acked with a vStopped packet, the server won't send another %Stop
notification. As a result, the debug session gets messed up. In
the new testcase's case, GDB would hang inside stop_all_threads,
waiting for a stop for one of the process'es threads, which never
arrived -- its stop reply was permanently stuck in the stop reply
queue, waiting for a vStopped packet that never arrived.
In summary:
1. GDBserver sends stop notification about thread X, the remote
target receives it and stores it
2. At the same time, GDB detaches thread X's inferior
3. The remote target discards the received stop notification
4. GDBserver waits forever for the ack
The GDBserver bug:
GDBserver has the opposite bug. It also discards notifications for
the process being detached. If that discards the head of the
notification queue, when gdb sends an ack, it ends up acking the
_next_ notification. Meaning, gdb loses one notification. In the
testcase, this results in a similar hang in stop_all_threads.
So we have two very similar bugs in GDB and GDBserver, both resulting
in a similar symptom. That's why I'm fixing them both at the same
time.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* remote.c (remote_notif_stop_ack): Don't error out on
TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE; instead, just ignore the notification.
(remote_target::discard_pending_stop_replies): Don't delete
in-flight notification; instead, clear its contents.
gdbserver/ChangeLog:
* server.cc (discard_queued_stop_replies): Don't ever discard the
notification at the head of the list.
|
|
This adds a testcase exercising attaching to a multi-threaded process,
in all combinations of:
- set non-stop on/off
- maint target non-stop off/on
- "attach" vs "attach &"
This exercises the bugs fixed in the two previous patches.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.threads/attach-non-stop.c: New file.
* gdb.threads/attach-non-stop.exp: New file.
|
|
With "target extended-remote" + "maint set target-non-stop", attaching
hangs like so:
(gdb) attach 1244450
Attaching to process 1244450
[New Thread 1244450.1244450]
[New Thread 1244450.1244453]
[New Thread 1244450.1244454]
[New Thread 1244450.1244455]
[New Thread 1244450.1244456]
[New Thread 1244450.1244457]
[New Thread 1244450.1244458]
[New Thread 1244450.1244459]
[New Thread 1244450.1244461]
[New Thread 1244450.1244462]
[New Thread 1244450.1244463]
* hang *
Attaching to the hung GDB shows that GDB is busy in an infinite loop
in stop_all_threads:
(top-gdb) bt
#0 stop_all_threads () at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/infrun.c:4755
#1 0x000055555597b424 in stop_waiting (ecs=0x7fffffffd930) at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/infrun.c:7738
#2 0x0000555555976fba in handle_signal_stop (ecs=0x7fffffffd930) at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/infrun.c:5868
#3 0x0000555555975f6a in handle_inferior_event (ecs=0x7fffffffd930) at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/infrun.c:5527
#4 0x0000555555971da4 in fetch_inferior_event () at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/infrun.c:3910
#5 0x00005555559540b2 in inferior_event_handler (event_type=INF_REG_EVENT) at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/inf-loop.c:42
#6 0x000055555597e825 in infrun_async_inferior_event_handler (data=0x0) at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/infrun.c:9162
#7 0x0000555555687d1d in check_async_event_handlers () at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/async-event.c:328
#8 0x0000555555e48284 in gdb_do_one_event () at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:216
#9 0x00005555559e7512 in start_event_loop () at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/main.c:347
#10 0x00005555559e765d in captured_command_loop () at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/main.c:407
#11 0x00005555559e8f80 in captured_main (data=0x7fffffffdb70) at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/main.c:1239
#12 0x00005555559e8ff2 in gdb_main (args=0x7fffffffdb70) at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/main.c:1254
#13 0x0000555555627c86 in main (argc=12, argv=0x7fffffffdc88) at /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/gdb.c:32
The problem is that the remote sends stops for all the threads:
Packet received: l/home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/attach-non-stop/attach-non-stop
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: T0006:f06e25edec7f0000;07:f06e25edec7f0000;10:f14190ccf4550000;thread:p12fd22.12fd2f;core:15;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: T0006:f0dea5f0ec7f0000;07:f0dea5f0ec7f0000;10:e84190ccf4550000;thread:p12fd22.12fd27;core:4;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: T0006:f0ee25f1ec7f0000;07:f0ee25f1ec7f0000;10:f14190ccf4550000;thread:p12fd22.12fd26;core:5;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: T0006:f0bea5efec7f0000;07:f0bea5efec7f0000;10:f14190ccf4550000;thread:p12fd22.12fd29;core:1;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: T0006:f0ce25f0ec7f0000;07:f0ce25f0ec7f0000;10:e84190ccf4550000;thread:p12fd22.12fd28;core:a;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: T0006:f07ea5edec7f0000;07:f07ea5edec7f0000;10:e84190ccf4550000;thread:p12fd22.12fd2e;core:f;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: T0006:f0ae25efec7f0000;07:f0ae25efec7f0000;10:df4190ccf4550000;thread:p12fd22.12fd2a;core:6;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: T0006:0000000000000000;07:c0e8a381fe7f0000;10:bf43b4f1ec7f0000;thread:p12fd22.12fd22;core:2;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: T0006:f0fea5f1ec7f0000;07:f0fea5f1ec7f0000;10:df4190ccf4550000;thread:p12fd22.12fd25;core:8;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: T0006:f09ea5eeec7f0000;07:f09ea5eeec7f0000;10:e84190ccf4550000;thread:p12fd22.12fd2b;core:b;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: OK
But then wait_one never consumes them, always hitting this path:
4473 if (nfds == 0)
4474 {
4475 /* No waitable targets left. All must be stopped. */
4476 return {NULL, minus_one_ptid, {TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_RESUMED}};
4477 }
Resulting in GDB constanly calling target_stop to stop threads, but
the remote target never reporting back the stops to infrun.
That TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_RESUMED path shown above is always taken
because here, in wait_one too, just above:
4428 for (inferior *inf : all_inferiors ())
4429 {
4430 process_stratum_target *target = inf->process_target ();
4431 if (target == NULL
4432 || !target->is_async_p ()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
4433 || !target->threads_executing)
4434 continue;
... the remote target is not async.
And in turn that happened because extended_remote_target::attach
misses enabling async in the target-non-stop path.
A testcase exercising this will be added in a following patch.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* remote.c (extended_remote_target::attach): Set target async in
the target-non-stop path too.
|
|
Attaching in non-stop mode currently misbehaves, like so:
(gdb) attach 1244450
Attaching to process 1244450
[New LWP 1244453]
[New LWP 1244454]
[New LWP 1244455]
[New LWP 1244456]
[New LWP 1244457]
[New LWP 1244458]
[New LWP 1244459]
[New LWP 1244461]
[New LWP 1244462]
[New LWP 1244463]
No unwaited-for children left.
At this point, GDB's stopped/running thread state is out of sync with
the inferior:
(gdb) info threads
Id Target Id Frame
* 1 LWP 1244450 "attach-non-stop" 0xf1b443bf in ?? ()
2 LWP 1244453 "attach-non-stop" (running)
3 LWP 1244454 "attach-non-stop" (running)
4 LWP 1244455 "attach-non-stop" (running)
5 LWP 1244456 "attach-non-stop" (running)
6 LWP 1244457 "attach-non-stop" (running)
7 LWP 1244458 "attach-non-stop" (running)
8 LWP 1244459 "attach-non-stop" (running)
9 LWP 1244461 "attach-non-stop" (running)
10 LWP 1244462 "attach-non-stop" (running)
11 LWP 1244463 "attach-non-stop" (running)
(gdb)
(gdb) interrupt -a
(gdb)
*nothing*
The problem is that attaching installs an inferior continuation,
called when the target reports the initial attach stop, here, in
inf-loop.c:inferior_event_handler:
/* Do all continuations associated with the whole inferior (not
a particular thread). */
if (inferior_ptid != null_ptid)
do_all_inferior_continuations (0);
However, currently in non-stop mode, inferior_ptid is still null_ptid
when we get here.
If you try to do "set debug infrun 1" to debug the problem, however,
then the attach completes correctly, with GDB reporting a stop for
each thread.
The bug is that we're missing a switch_to_thread/context_switch call
when handling the initial stop, here:
if (stop_soon == STOP_QUIETLY_NO_SIGSTOP
&& (ecs->event_thread->suspend.stop_signal == GDB_SIGNAL_STOP
|| ecs->event_thread->suspend.stop_signal == GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP
|| ecs->event_thread->suspend.stop_signal == GDB_SIGNAL_0))
{
stop_print_frame = true;
stop_waiting (ecs);
ecs->event_thread->suspend.stop_signal = GDB_SIGNAL_0;
return;
}
Note how the STOP_QUIETLY / STOP_QUIETLY_REMOTE case above that does
call context_switch.
And the reason "set debug infrun 1" "fixes" it, is that the debug path
has a switch_to_thread call.
This patch fixes it by moving the main context_switch call earlier.
It also removes the:
if (ecs->ptid != inferior_ptid)
check at the same time because:
#1 - that is half of what context_switch already does
#2 - deprecated_context_hook is only used in Insight, and all it does
is set an int. It won't care if we call it when the current
thread hasn't actually changed.
A testcase exercising this will be added in a following patch.
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR gdb/27055
* infrun.c (handle_signal_stop): Move main context_switch call
earlier, before STOP_QUIETLY_NO_SIGSTOP.
|
|
|
|
This patch makes the inferior command display information about the
current inferior when called with no argument. This behavior is similar
to the one of the thread command.
Before patch:
(gdb) info inferior
Num Description Connection Executable
* 1 process 19221 1 (native) /home/lsix/tmp/a.out
2 process 19239 1 (native) /home/lsix/tmp/a.out
(gdb) inferior 2
[Switching to inferior 2 [process 19239] (/home/lsix/tmp/a.out)]
[Switching to thread 2.1 (process 19239)]
#0 0x0000000000401146 in main ()
(gdb) inferior
Argument required (expression to compute).
After patch:
(gdb) info inferior
Num Description Connection Executable
* 1 process 18699 1 (native) /home/lsix/tmp/a.out
2 process 18705 1 (native) /home/lsix/tmp/a.out
(gdb) inferior 2
[Switching to inferior 2 [process 18705] (/home/lsix/tmp/a.out)]
[Switching to thread 2.1 (process 18705)]
#0 0x0000000000401146 in main ()
(gdb) inferior
[Current inferior is 2 [process 18705] (/home/lsix/tmp/a.out)]
gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
* gdb.texinfo (Inferiors Connections and Programs): Document the
inferior command when used without argument.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* NEWS: Add entry for the behavior change of the inferior command.
* inferior.c (inferior_command): When no argument is given to the
inferior command, display info about the currently selected
inferior.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/inferior-noarg.c: New test.
* gdb.base/inferior-noarg.exp: New test.
|
|
Fixes:
Running /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/scope.exp ...
DUPLICATE: gdb.base/scope.exp: print 'scope0.c'::filelocal_ro
DUPLICATE: gdb.base/scope.exp: print 'scope0.c'::filelocal_ro
DUPLICATE: gdb.base/scope.exp: next
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/scope.exp: Use proc_with_prefix.
Change-Id: Ic40e24a603da6f2a4f8003b74b2ff3040d2b098d
|
|
It is possible for the tables in the .debug_{rng,loc}lists sections to
not have an array of offsets. In that case, the offset_entry_count
field of the header is 0. The forms DW_FORM_{rng,loc}listx (reference
by index) can't be used with that table. Instead, the
DW_FORM_sec_offset form, which references a {rng,loc}list by direct
offset in the section, must be used. From what I saw, this is what GCC
currently produces.
Add tests for this case. I didn't see any bug related to this, I just
think that it would be nice to have coverage for this. A new
`-with-offset-array` option is added to the `table` procs, used when
generating {rng,loc}lists, to decide whether to generate the offset
array.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* lib/dwarf.exp (rnglists): Add -no-offset-array option to
table proc.
* gdb.dwarf2/rnglists-sec-offset.exp: Add test for
.debug_rnglists table without offset array.
* gdb.dwarf2/loclists-sec-offset.exp: Add test for
.debug_loclists table without offset array.
Change-Id: I8e34a7bf68c9682215ffbbf66600da5b7db91ef7
|
|
I think it's wrong that read_loclist_index and read_rnglist_index return
a CORE_ADDR. A CORE_ADDR is an address in the program. These functions
return offset in sections (.debug_loclists and .debug_rnglists). I
think sect_offset is more appropriate.
I'm wondering if struct attribute should have a "set_sect_offset"
method, that takes a sect_offset parameter, or if it's better to be
left as a simple "unsigned".
gdb/ChangeLog:
* dwarf2/read.c (read_loclist_index, read_rnglist_index): Return
a sect_offset.
(read_attribute_reprocess): Adjust.
Change-Id: I0e22e0864130fb490072b41ae099762918b8ad4d
|
|
Consider the test case added in this patch. It defines a compilation
unit with a DW_AT_rnglists_base attribute (used for attributes of form
DW_FORM_rnglistx), but also uses DW_AT_ranges of form
DW_FORM_sec_offset:
0x00000027: DW_TAG_compile_unit
DW_AT_ranges [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x0000004c
[0x0000000000005000, 0x0000000000006000))
DW_AT_rnglists_base [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000044)
The DW_AT_rnglists_base does not play a role in reading the DW_AT_ranges of
form DW_FORM_sec_offset, but it should also not do any harm.
This case is currently not handled correctly by GDB. This is not
something that a compiler is likely to emit, but in my opinion there's
no reason why GDB should fail reading it.
The problem is that in partial_die_info::read and a few other places
where the same logic is replicated, the cu->ranges_base value,
containing the DW_AT_rnglists_base value, is wrongfully added to the
DW_AT_ranges value.
It is quite messy how to decide whether cu->ranges_base should be added
to the attribute's value or not. But to summarize, the only time we
want to add it is when the attribute comes from a pre-DWARF 5 split unit
file (a .dwo) [1]. In this case, the DW_AT_ranges attribute from the
split unit file will have form DW_FORM_sec_offset, pointing somewhere in
the linked file's .debug_ranges section. *But* it's not a "true"
DW_FORM_sec_offset, in that it's an offset relative to the beginning of
that CU's contribution in the section, not relative to the beginning of
the section. So in that case, and only that case, do we want to add the
ranges base value, which we found from the DW_AT_GNU_ranges_base
attribute on the skeleton unit.
Almost all instances of the DW_AT_ranges attribute will be found in the
split unit (on DW_TAG_subprogram, for example), and therefore need to
have the ranges base added. However, the DW_TAG_compile_unit DIE in the
skeleton may also have a DW_AT_ranges attribute. For that one, the
ranges base must not be added. Once the DIEs have been loaded in GDB,
however, the distinction between what's coming from the skeleton and
what's coming from the split unit is not clear. It is all merged in one
big happy tree. So how do we know if a given attribute comes from the
split unit or not?
We use the fact that in pre-DWARF 5 split DWARF, DW_AT_ranges is found
on the skeleton's DW_TAG_compile_unit (in the linked file) and never in
the split unit's DW_TAG_compile_unit. This is why you have this in
partial_die_info::read:
int need_ranges_base = (tag != DW_TAG_compile_unit
&& attr.form != DW_FORM_rnglistx);
However, with the corner case described above (where we have a
DW_AT_rnglists_base attribute and a DW_AT_ranges attribute of form
DW_FORM_sec_offset) the condition gets it wrong when it encounters an
attribute like DW_TAG_subprogram with a DW_AT_ranges attribute of
DW_FORM_sec_offset form: it thinks that it is necessary to add the base,
when it reality it is not.
The problem boils down to failing to differentiate these cases:
- a DW_AT_ranges attribute of form DW_FORM_sec_offset in a
pre-DWARF 5 split unit (in which case we need to add the base)
- a DW_AT_ranges attribute of form DW_FORM_sec_offset in a DWARF 5
non-split unit (in which case we must not add the base)
What makes it unnecessarily complex is that the cu->ranges_base field is
overloaded, used to hold the pre-DWARF 5, non-standard
DW_AT_GNU_ranges_base and the DWARF 5 DW_AT_rnglists_base. In reality,
these two are called "bases" but are not the same thing. The result is
that we need twisted conditions to try to determine whether or not we
should add the base to the attribute's value.
To fix it, split the field in two distinct fields. I renamed everything
related to the "old" ranges base to "gnu_ranges_base", to make it clear
that it's about the non-standard, pre-DWARF 5 thing. And everything
related to the DWARF 5 thing gets renamed "rnglists". I think it
becomes much easier to reason this way.
The issue described above gets fixed by the fact that the
DW_AT_rnglists_base value does not end up in cu->gnu_ranges_base, so
cu->gnu_ranges_base stays 0. The condition to determine whether
gnu_ranges_base should be added can therefore be simplified back to:
tag != DW_TAG_compile_unit
... as it was before rnglistx support was added.
Extend the gdb.dwarf2/rnglists-sec-offset.exp to cover this case. I
also extended the test case for loclists similarly, just to see if there
would be some similar problem. There wasn't, but I think it's not a bad
idea to test that case for loclists as well, so I left it in the patch.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebugFission
gdb/ChangeLog:
* dwarf2/die.h (struct die_info) <ranges_base>: Split in...
<gnu_ranges_base>: ... this...
<rnglists_base>: ... and this.
* dwarf2/read.c (struct dwarf2_cu) <ranges_base>: Split in...
<gnu_ranges_base>: ... this...
<rnglists_base>: ... and this.
(read_cutu_die_from_dwo): Adjust
(dwarf2_get_pc_bounds): Adjust
(dwarf2_record_block_ranges): Adjust.
(read_full_die_1): Adjust
(partial_die_info::read): Adjust.
(read_rnglist_index): Adjust.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.dwarf2/rnglists-sec-offset.exp: Add test for DW_AT_ranges
of DW_FORM_sec_offset form plus DW_AT_rnglists_base attribute.
* gdb.dwarf2/loclists-sec-offset.exp: Add test for
DW_AT_location of DW_FORM_sec_offset plus DW_AT_loclists_base
attribute
Change-Id: Icd109038634b75d0e6e9d7d1dcb62fb9eb951d83
|
|
Add tests for the various issues fixed in the previous patches.
Add a new "loclists" procedure to the DWARF assembler, to allow
generating .debug_loclists sections.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR gdb/26813
* lib/dwarf.exp (_handle_DW_FORM): Handle DW_FORM_loclistx.
(loclists): New proc.
* gdb.dwarf2/loclists-multiple-cus.c: New.
* gdb.dwarf2/loclists-multiple-cus.exp: New.
* gdb.dwarf2/loclists-sec-offset.c: New.
* gdb.dwarf2/loclists-sec-offset.exp: New.
Change-Id: I209bcb2a9482762ae943e518998d1f7761f76928
|
|
The _location proc is used to assemble a location description. It needs
to know some contextual information:
- size of an address
- size of an offset (into another DWARF section)
- DWARF version
It currently get all this directly from global variables holding the
compilation unit information. This is fine because as of now, all
location descriptions are generated in the context of creating a
compilation unit. However, a subsequent patch will generate location
descriptions while generating a .debug_loclists section. _location
should therefore no longer rely on the current compilation unit's
properties.
Change it to accept these values as parameters instead of accessing the
values for the CU.
No functional changes intended.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* lib/dwarf.exp (_location): Add parameters.
(_handle_DW_FORM): Adjust.
Change-Id: Ib94981979c83ffbebac838081d645ad71c221637
|
|
Add tests for the various issues fixed in the previous patches.
Add a new "rnglists" procedure to the DWARF assembler, to allow
generating .debug_rnglists sections. A trivial change is required to
support the DWARF 5 CU header layout.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR gdb/26813
* lib/dwarf.exp (_handle_DW_FORM): Handle DW_FORM_rnglistx.
(cu): Generate header for DWARF 5.
(rnglists): New proc.
* gdb.dwarf2/rnglists-multiple-cus.exp: New.
* gdb.dwarf2/rnglists-sec-offset.exp: New.
Change-Id: I5b297e59c370c60cf671dec19796a6c3b9a9f632
|
|
When loading the binary from PR 26813 in GDB, we get:
DW_FORM_rnglistx index pointing outside of .debug_rnglists offset array [in module /home/simark/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/MagicPurse]
... and the symbols fail to load.
In read_rnglist_index and read_loclist_index, we read the header
(documented in sections 7.28 and 7.29 of DWARF 5) of the CU's
contribution to the .debug_rnglists / .debug_loclists sections to
validate that the index we want to read makes sense. However, we always
read the header at the beginning of the section, rather than the header
for the contribution from which we want to read the index.
To illustrate, here's what the binary from PR 26813 contains. There are
two compile units:
0x0000000c: DW_TAG_compile_unit 1
DW_AT_ranges [DW_FORM_rnglistx]: 0x0
DW_AT_rnglists_base [DW_FORM_sec_offset]: 0xC
0x00003ec9: DW_TAG_compile_unit 2
DW_AT_ranges [DW_FORM_rnglistx]: 0xB
DW_AT_rnglists_base [DW_FORM_sec_offset]: 0x85
The layout of the .debug_rnglists is the following:
[0x00, 0x0B]: header for CU 1's contribution
[0x0C, 0x0F]: list of offsets for CU 1 (1 element)
[0x10, 0x78]: range lists data for CU 1
[0x79, 0x84]: header for CU 2's contribution
[0x85, 0xB4]: list of offsets for CU 2 (12 elements)
[0xB5, 0xBD7]: range lists data for CU 2
The DW_AT_rnglists_base attrbute points to the beginning of the list of
offsets for that CU, relative to the start of the .debug_rnglists
section. That's right after the header for that contribution.
When we try to read the DW_AT_ranges attribute for CU 2,
read_rnglist_index reads the header for CU 1 instead of the one for CU
2. Since there's only one element in CU 1's offset list, it believes
(wrongfully) that the index 0xB is out of range.
Fix it by reading the header just before where DW_AT_rnglists_base
points to. With this patch, I am able to load GDB built with clang-11
and -gdwarf-5 in itself, with and without -readnow.
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR gdb/26813
* dwarf2/read.c (read_loclists_rnglists_header): Add
header_offset parameter and use it.
(read_loclist_index): Read header of the current contribution,
not the one at the beginning of the section.
(read_rnglist_index): Likewise.
Change-Id: Ie53ff8251af8c1556f0a83a31aa8572044b79e3d
|
|
We hit an assertion when loading the binary from PR 26813. When fixing
it, execution goes a up bit further but then hits another assert, and
another, and another. With these fours fixes, I am able to load the
binary and get to the prompt. An error is shown (index pointing outside
of the section), because the DW_FORM_rnglistx attribute is not read
correctly, but that one is taken care of by the next patch.
The four fixes are:
- attribute::form_requires_reprocessing needs to handle forms
DW_FORM_rnglistx and DW_FORM_loclistx, because set_unsigned_reprocess
is called for them in read_attribute_value.
- read_attribute_reprocess must call set_unsigned for them, not
set_address. The parameter of set_address is a CORE_ADDR, meaning
it's for program addresses. Post-reprocess, DW_FORM_rnglistx and
DW_FORM_loclistx are offsets into their respective sections
(.debug_rnglists and .debug_loclists). set_unsigned is the current
attribute value setter that fits the best. But perhaps we should have
a setter that takes a sect_offset?
- read_attribute_process must call as_unsigned_reprocess instead of
as_unsigned to get the pre-reprocess value, otherwise we hit the
assert inside as_unsigned that makes sure the attribute doesn't need
reprocessing.
- attribute::set_unsigned needs to clear the requires_reprocessing flag,
otherwise it stays set when reprocessing DW_FORM_rnglistx and
DW_FORM_loclistx attributes.
There's another assert that we hit once the next patch is applied, but
since it's in the same vein as the changes in this patch, I included it
in this patch:
- attribute::form_is_unsigned must handle form DW_FORM_loclistx,
otherwise we hit the assert when trying to call set_unsigned for an
attribute of this form. DW_FORM_rnglistx is already handled.
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR gdb/26813
* dwarf2/attribute.h (struct attribute) <set_unsigned>: Clear
requires_reprocessing flag.
* dwarf2/attribute.c (attribute::form_is_unsigned): Handle
DW_FORM_loclistx.
(attribute::form_requires_reprocessing): Handle DW_FORM_rnglistx
and DW_FORM_loclistx.
* dwarf2/read.c (read_attribute_reprocess): Use set_unsigned
instead of set_address for DW_FORM_loclistx and
DW_FORM_rnglistx.
Change-Id: I06c156fa3913ca98e4e39085f4ef171645b4bc1e
|
|
In read_rnglist_index and read_loclist_index, we check that both the
start and end of the offset that we read from the offset table are
within the section. I think it's unecessary to do both: if the end of
the offset is within the section, then surely the start of the offset is
within it.
Remove the check for the start of the offset in both functions.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* dwarf2/read.c (read_loclist_index): Remove bound check for
start of offset.
(read_rnglist_index): Likewise.
Change-Id: I7b57ddf4f8a8a28971738f0e3f3af62108f9e19a
|
|
read_rnglist_index has a bound check to make sure that we don't go past
the end of the section while reading the offset, but read_loclist_index
doesn't. Add it to read_loclist_index.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* dwarf2/read.c (read_loclist_index): Add bound check for the end
of the offset.
Change-Id: Ic4b55c88860fdc3e007740949c78ec84cdb4da60
|
|
I think this check in read_rnglist_index is wrong:
/* Validate that reading won't go beyond the end of the section. */
if (start_offset + cu->header.offset_size > rnglist_base + section->size)
error (_("Reading DW_FORM_rnglistx index beyond end of"
".debug_rnglists section [in module %s]"),
objfile_name (objfile));
The addition `rnglist_base + section->size` doesn't make sense.
rnglist_base is an offset into `section`, so it doesn't make sense to
add it to `section`'s size. `start_offset` also is an offset into
`section`, so we should just compare it to just `section->size`.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* dwarf2/read.c (read_rnglist_index): Fix bound check.
Change-Id: If0ff7c73f4f80f79aac447518f4e8f131f2db8f2
|
|
Unlike read_rnglists_index, read_loclist_index uses complaints when it
detects an inconsistency (a DW_FORM_loclistx value without a
.debug_loclists section or an offset outside of the section). I really
think they should be errors, since there's no point in continuing if
this situation happens, we will likely segfault or read garbage.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* dwarf2/read.c (read_loclist_index): Change complaints into
errors.
Change-Id: Ic3a1cf6e682d47cb6e739dd76fd7ca5be2637e10
|
|
Add "R (retain)" and "D (mbind)" to "Key to Flags:".
PR binutils/27281
* readelf.c (process_section_headers): Add 'R' and 'D' to
"Key to Flags:".
* testsuite/binutils-all/retain1a.d: Updated.
|
|
A default versioned symbol definition in a shared library is
overridden by an unversioned definition in a regular object file, and
thus should not be reason to make an as-needed library needed.
bfd/
PR 27311
* elflink.c (_bfd_elf_add_default_symbol): Add override parameter.
Use when handling default versioned symbol. Rename existing
override variable to nondef_override and use for non-default
versioned symbol.
(elf_link_add_object_symbols): Adjust call to suit. Don't
pull in as-needed libraries when override is set.
ld/
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr27311.d,
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr27311.ver,
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr27311a.c,
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr27311b.c,
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr27311c.c: New testcase.
* testsuite/ld-plugin/lto.exp: Run it. Correct PR14918 and
PR12982 entries.
|
|
When running test-case gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.exp with target board
cc-with-gdb-index, we run into an abort during the generation of the gdb-index
by cc-with-tweaks.sh:
...
build/gdb/testsuite/cache/gdb.sh: line 1: 27275 Aborted (core dumped)
...
This can be reproduced on the command line like this:
...
$ gdb -batch ./outputs/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread/fission-reread \
-ex 'save gdb-index ./outputs/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread'
warning: Could not find DWO TU fission-reread.dwo(0x9022f1ceac7e8b19) \
referenced by TU at offset 0x0 [in module fission-reread]
warning: Could not find DWO CU fission-reread.dwo(0x807060504030201) \
referenced by CU at offset 0x561 [in module fission-reread]
Aborted (core dumped)
...
The abort is a segfault due to a using a nullptr psymtab in
write_one_signatured_type.
The problem is that we're trying to write index entries for the type unit
with signature:
...
(gdb) p /x entry->signature
$2 = 0x9022f1ceac7e8b19
...
which is a skeleton type unit:
...
Contents of the .debug_types section:
Compilation Unit @ offset 0x0:
Length: 0x4a (32-bit)
Version: 4
Abbrev Offset: 0x165
Pointer Size: 4
Signature: 0x9022f1ceac7e8b19
Type Offset: 0x0
<0><17>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_type_unit)
<18> DW_AT_comp_dir : /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite
<2f> DW_AT_GNU_dwo_name: fission-reread.dwo
<42> DW_AT_GNU_pubnames: 0x0
<46> DW_AT_GNU_pubtypes: 0x0
<4a> DW_AT_GNU_addr_base: 0x0
...
referring to a .dwo file, but as the warnings show, the .dwo file is not
found.
Fix this by skipping the type unit in write_one_signatured_type if
psymtab == nullptr.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2021-02-02 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR symtab/24620
* dwarf2/index-write.c (write_one_signatured_type): Skip if
psymtab == nullptr.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2021-02-02 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR symtab/24620
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.exp: Add test-case.
|
|
|
|
* configure.tgt: Add *-*-genode* as a target for AArch64 and x86.
|
|
When running test-case gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.exp with target board
cc-with-gdb-index, we run into:
...
gdb compile failed, warning: Could not find DWO TU \
fission-reread.dwo(0x9022f1ceac7e8b19) referenced by TU at offset 0x0 \
[in module outputs/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread/fission-reread]
...
The problem is that the .dwo file is not found.
There's code added in the .exp file to make sure the .dwo can be found:
...
# Make sure we can find the .dwo file, regardless of whether we're
# running in parallel mode.
gdb_test_no_output "set debug-file-directory [file dirname $binfile]" \
"set debug-file-directory"
...
This works normally, but not for the gdb invocation done by cc-with-tweaks.sh
for target board cc-with-gdb-index.
Fix this by finding the full path to the .dwo file and passing it
to the compilation.
Tested on x86_64-linux with native and target boards cc-with-gdb-index,
cc-with-debug-names and readnow.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2021-02-01 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-base.S: Pass -DDWO=$dwo.
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-loclists-pie.S: Same.
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-loclists.S: Same.
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-multi-cu.S: Same.
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.S: Same.
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-base.exp: Use DWO.
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-loclists-pie.exp: Same.
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-loclists.exp: Same.
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-multi-cu.exp: Same.
* gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.exp: Same.
|
|
PR 27254
* elf32-rl78.c (rl78_elf_relocate_section): Fix calculation of
offset for the R_RL78_RH_SADDR relocation.
|
|
2.35.2 release
|
|
This makes --defsym support the same expressions as assignment in a
script. For example, --defsym 'HIDDEN(foo=0)', will define a hidden
visibility foo.
* ldgram.y (defsym_expr): Use assignment rule.
* ldlex.h (ldlex_defsym): Delete.
* ldlex.l (DEFSYMEXP, ldlex_defsym): Delete.
|
|
Parsing symbol or file/section names in ld linker scripts is a little
complicated. Inside SECTIONS, a name might be the start of an
expression or an output section. Is ".foo=x-y" a fancy section name
or is it the expression ".foo = x - y"? It isn't possible for a
single lookahead parser to decide, so the answer in this case is
that it's a section name. This is the reason why everyone writes
linker script assignment expressions with lots of white-space.
However, there are many places where the parser knows for sure that an
expression is expected. Those could be written without whitespace
given the first change to ldlex.l below. Unfortunately, that runs
into a lookahead problem. Optional expressions at the end of an
output section statement require the parser to look ahead one token in
expression context. For this example from standard scripts
.interp : { *(.interp) }
.note.gnu.build-id : { *(.note.gnu.build-id) }
at the end of the .interp closing brace, the parser is looking for
a possible memspec, phdr, fill or even an optional comma. The next
token is a NAME, but in expression context that NAME now doesn't
include '-' as a valid char. So the lookahead NAME is
".note.gnu.build" with an unexpected "-id" syntax error before the
colon. The rest of the patch involving ldlex_backup arranges to
discard that NAME token so that it will be rescanned in the proper
script context.
* ldgram.y (section): Call ldlex_backup. Remove empty action.
* ldlex.h (ldlex_backup): Declare.
* ldlex.l (<EXPRESSION>NAME): Don't use NOCFILENAMECHAR set of
chars, use SYMBOLNAMECHAR.
(ldlex_backup): New function.
|
|
While reviewing the Linux and FreeBSD core dumping code within GDB for
another patch series, I noticed that the code that collects the
registers for each thread and writes these into ELF note format is
basically identical between Linux and FreeBSD.
This commit merges this code and moves it into the gcore.c file,
which seemed like the right place for generic writing a core file
code.
The function find_signalled_thread is moved from linux-tdep.c despite
not being shared. A later commit will make use of this function.
There are a couple of minor changes to the FreeBSD target after this
commit, but I believe that these are changes for the better:
(1) For FreeBSD we always used to record the thread-id in the core file by
using ptid_t.lwp (). In contrast the Linux code did this:
/* For remote targets the LWP may not be available, so use the TID. */
long lwp = ptid.lwp ();
if (lwp == 0)
lwp = ptid.tid ();
Both target now do this:
/* The LWP is often not available for bare metal target, in which case
use the tid instead. */
if (ptid.lwp_p ())
lwp = ptid.lwp ();
else
lwp = ptid.tid ();
Which is equivalent for Linux, but is a change for FreeBSD. I think
that all this means is that in some cases where GDB might have
previously recorded a thread-id of 0 for each thread, we might now get
something more useful.
(2) When collecting the registers for Linux we collected into a zero
initialised buffer. By contrast on FreeBSD the buffer is left
uninitialised. In the new code the buffer is always zero initialised.
I suspect once the registers are copied into the buffer there's
probably no gaps left so this makes no difference, but if it does then
using zeros rather than random bits of GDB's memory is probably a good
thing.
Otherwise, there should be no other user visible changes after this
commit.
Tested this on x86-64/GNU-Linux and x86-64/FreeBSD-12.2 with no
regressions.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in (HFILES_NO_SRCDIR): Add corefile.h.
* gcore.c (struct gcore_collect_regset_section_cb_data): Moved
here from linux-tdep.c and given a new name. Minor cleanups.
(gcore_collect_regset_section_cb): Likewise.
(gcore_collect_thread_registers): Likewise.
(gcore_build_thread_register_notes): Likewise.
(gcore_find_signalled_thread): Likewise.
* gcore.h (gcore_build_thread_register_notes): Declare.
(gcore_find_signalled_thread): Declare.
* fbsd-tdep.c: Add 'gcore.h' include.
(struct fbsd_collect_regset_section_cb_data): Delete.
(fbsd_collect_regset_section_cb): Delete.
(fbsd_collect_thread_registers): Delete.
(struct fbsd_corefile_thread_data): Delete.
(fbsd_corefile_thread): Delete.
(fbsd_make_corefile_notes): Call
gcore_build_thread_register_notes instead of the now deleted
FreeBSD code.
* linux-tdep.c: Add 'gcore.h' include.
(struct linux_collect_regset_section_cb_data): Delete.
(linux_collect_regset_section_cb): Delete.
(linux_collect_thread_registers): Delete.
(linux_corefile_thread): Call
gcore_build_thread_register_notes.
(find_signalled_thread): Delete.
(linux_make_corefile_notes): Call gcore_find_signalled_thread.
|
|
Beginning a new rule hidden inside another rule is horrible.
* ldgram.y: Whitespace fixes.
|
|
* testsuite/ld-elf/pr27259.d: Correct sh_link match.
|
|
PR 27283
* config/tc-alpha.c (insert_operand): Delete dead code.
|
|
|
|
GCC warns that we pass a non-string literal as the format string,
so add an explicit "%s" to make it happy.
|
|
The extract function takes the argbuf, not the scache.
|
