aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-06-01Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-05-31x86: Properly handle IFUNC function pointer referenceH.J. Lu4-2/+85
Update commit 68c4956b1401de70173848a6bdf620cb42fa9358 Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 26 09:08:54 2022 -0700 x86: Properly handle function pointer reference to properly handle IFUNC function pointer reference. Since IFUNC symbol value is only known at run-time, set pointer_equality_needed for IFUNC function pointer reference in PDE so that it will be resolved to its PLT entry directly. bfd/ PR ld/29216 * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_scan_relocs): Set pointer_equality_needed for IFUNC function pointer reference in PDE. * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_scan_relocs): Likewise. ld/ PR ld/29216 * testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc.exp: Run PR ld/29216 test. * testsuite/ld-ifunc/pr29216.c: New file.
2022-05-31i386: Ajdust more tests for opcodes/i386: remove trailing whitespaceH.J. Lu13-19/+19
This fixes: FAIL: Build ifunc-1a with -z ibtplt FAIL: Build ifunc-1a with PIE -z ibtplt FAIL: Build libno-plt-1b.so FAIL: No PLT (dynamic 1a) FAIL: No PLT (dynamic 1b) FAIL: No PLT (dynamic 1c) FAIL: No PLT (static 1d) FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1e) FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1f) FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1g) FAIL: No PLT (dynamic 1h) FAIL: No PLT (dynamic 1i) FAIL: No PLT (static 1j) * ld-i386/libno-plt-1b.dd: Remove trailing whitespaces. * ld-i386/no-plt-1a.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/no-plt-1b.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/no-plt-1c.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/no-plt-1d.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/no-plt-1e.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/no-plt-1f.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/no-plt-1g.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/no-plt-1h.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/no-plt-1i.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/no-plt-1j.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/plt-main-ibt.dd: Likewise. * ld-i386/plt-pie-ibt.dd: Likewise.
2022-05-31Use unique_ptr for objfilesTom Tromey4-11/+9
A while back, I changed objfiles to be held via a shared_ptr. The idea at the time was that this was a step toward writing to the index cache in the background, and this would let gdb keep a reference alive to do so. However, since then we've rewritten the DWARF reader, and the new index can do this without requiring a shared pointer -- in fact there are patches pending to implement this. This patch switches objfile management to unique_ptr, which makes more sense now. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 34.
2022-05-31gdb/testsuite: fixup common-block.exp for intel compilersNils-Christian Kempke1-3/+35
The order in which the variables in info common and info locals are displayed is compiler (and dwarf) dependent. While all symbols should be displayed the order is not fixed. I added a gdb_test_multiple that lets ifx and ifort pass in cases where only the order differs.
2022-05-31gdb, testsuite, fortran: fixup mixed-lang-stack for Intel/LLVM compilersNils-Christian Kempke1-7/+14
When value-printing a pointer within GDB by default GDB will look for defined symbols residing at the address of the pointer. For the given test the Intel/LLVM compiler stacks both display a symbol associated with a printed pointer while the gnu stack does not. This leads to failures in the test when running the test with CC_FOR_TARGET='clang' CXX_FOR_TARGET='clang' F90_FOR_TARGET='flang'" (gdb) b 37 (gdb) r (gdb) f 6 (gdb) info args a = 1 b = 2 c = 3 d = 4 + 5i f = 0x419ed0 "abcdef" g = 0x4041a0 <.BSS4> or CC_FOR_TARGET='icx' CXX_FOR_TARGET='icpx' F90_FOR_TARGET='ifx'" (gdb) b 37 (gdb) r (gdb) f 6 (gdb) info args a = 1 b = 2 c = 3 d = 4 + 5i f = 0x52eee0 "abcdef" g = 0x4ca210 <mixed_func_1a_$OBJ> For the compiled binary the Intel/LLVM compilers both decide to move the local variable g into the .bss section of their executable. The gnu stack will keep the variable locally on the stack and not define a symbol for it. Since the behavior for Intel/LLVM is actually expected I adapted the testcase at this point to be a bit more allowing for other outputs. I added the optional "<SYMBOLNAME>" to the regex testing for g. The given changes reduce the test fails for Intel/LLVM stack by 4 each.
2022-05-31gdb, testsuite, fortran: fix double free in mixed-lang-stack.expNils-Christian Kempke1-11/+1
While testing mixed-lang-stack I realized that valgrind actually complained about a double free in the test. All done ==2503051== ==2503051== HEAP SUMMARY: ==2503051== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==2503051== total heap usage: 26 allocs, 27 frees, 87,343 bytes allocated ==2503051== ==2503051== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible ==2503051== ==2503051== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s ==2503051== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) Reason for this is that in mixed-lang-stack.cpp in mixed_func_1f an object "derived_type obj" goes on the stack which is then passed-by-value (so copied) to mixed_func_1g. The default copy-ctor will be called but, since derived_type contains a heap allocated string and the copy constructor is not implemented it will only be able to shallow copy the object. Right after each of the functions the object gets freed - on the other hand the d'tor of derived_type actually is implemented and calls free on the heap allocated string which leads to a double free. Instead of obeying the rule of 3/5 I just got rid of all that since it does not serve the test. The string is now just a const char* = ".." object member.
2022-05-31testsuite, fortran: allow additional completions in module.expNils-Christian Kempke1-2/+3
For ifort, ifx, and flang the tests "complete modm" and "complete modmany" fail. This is because all three emit additional completion suggestions. These additional suggestions have their origin in symbols emitted by the compilers which can also be completed from the respective incomplete word (modm or modmany). For this specific example gfortran does not emit any additional symbols. For example, in this test the linkage name for var_a in ifx is "modmany_mp_var_a_" while gfortran uses "__modmany_MOD_var_a" instead. Since modmany_mp_var_a can be completed from modm and also modmany they will get displayed, while gfortran's symbol starts with "__" and thus will be ignored (it cannot be a completion of a word starting with "m"). Similar things happen in flang and ifort. Some example output is shown below: FLANG (gdb) complete p modm p modmany p modmany::var_a p modmany::var_b p modmany::var_c p modmany::var_i p modmany_ IFX/IFORT (gdb) complete p modm p modmany p modmany._ p modmany::var_a p modmany::var_b p modmany::var_c p modmany::var_i p modmany_mp_var_a_ p modmany_mp_var_b_ p modmany_mp_var_c_ p modmany_mp_var_i_ GFORTRAN (gdb) complete p modm p modmany p modmany::var_a p modmany::var_b p modmany::var_c p modmany::var_i I want to emphasize: for Fortran (and also C/C++) the complete command does not actually check whether its suggestions make sense - all it does is look for any symbol (in the minimal symbols, partial symbols etc.) that a given substring can be completed to (meaning that the given substring is the beginning of the symbol). One can easily produce a similar output for the gfortran compiled executable. For this look at the slightly modified "complete p mod" in gfortran: (gdb) complete p mod p mod1 p mod1::var_const ... p mod_1.c p modcounter p mode_t p modf ... p modify_ldt p modmany p modmany::var_a p modmany::var_b p modmany::var_c p modmany::var_i p module p module.f90 p module_entry p moduse p moduse::var_x p moduse::var_y Many of the displayed symbols do not actually work with print: (gdb) p mode_t Attempt to use a type name as an expression (gdb) p mod_1.c No symbol "mod_1" in current context. (gdb) I think that in the given test the output for gfortran only looks nice "by chance" rather than is actually expected. Expected is any output that also contains the completions p modmany p modmany::var_a p modmany::var_b p modmany::var_c p modmany::var_i while anythings else can be displayed as well (depending on the compiler and its emitted symbols). This, I'd consider all three outputs as valid and expected - one is just somewhat lucky that gfortran does not produce any additional symbols that got matched. The given patch improves test performance for all three compilers by allowing additional suggested completions inbetween and after the two given blocks in the test. I did not allow additional print within the modmany_list block since the output is ordered alphabetically and there should normally not appear any additional symbols there. For flang/ifx/ifort I each see 2 failures less (which are exactly the two complete tests). As a side note and since I mentioned C++ in the beginning: I also tried the gdb.cp/completion.exp. The output seems a bit more reasonable, mainly since C++ actually has a demangler in place and linkage symbols do not appear in the output of complete. Still, with a poor enough to-be-completed string one can easily produce similar results: (gdb) complete p t ... p typeinfo name for void p typeinfo name for void const* p typeinfo name for void* p typeinfo name for wchar_t p typeinfo name for wchar_t const* p typeinfo name for wchar_t* p t *** List may be truncated, max-completions reached. *** (gdb) p typeinfo name for void* No symbol "typeinfo" in current context. (gdb) complete p B p BACK_SLASH p BUF_FIRST p BUF_LAST ... p Base p Base::Base() p Base::get_foo() p bad_key_err p buf p buffer p buffer_size p buflen p bufsize p build_charclass.isra (gdb) p bad_key_err No symbol "bad_key_err" in current context. (compiled with gcc/g++ and breaking at main). This patch is only about making the referenced test more 'fair' for the other compilers. Generally, I find the behavior of complete a bit confusing and maybe one wants to change this at some point but this would be a bigger task.
2022-05-31testsuite, fortran: fix info-types for intel compilersNils-Christian Kempke1-3/+17
This info-types.exp test case had a few issues that this patch fixes. First, the emitted symbol character(kind=1)/character*1 (different compilers use different naming converntions here) which is checkedin the test is not actually expected given the test program. There is no variable of that type in the test. Still, gfortran emits it for every Fortran program there is. The reason is the way gfortran handles Fortran's named main program. It generates a wrapper around the Fortran program that is quite similar to a C main function. This C-like wrapper has argc and argv arguments for command line argument passing and the argv pointer type has a base type character(kind=1) DIE emitted at CU scope. Given the program program prog end program prog the degbug info gfortran emits looks somewhat like <0><c>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_compile_unit) ... <1><2f>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_subprogram) <30> DW_AT_external : 1 <30> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, ...): main ... <2><51>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter) <52> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, ...): argc ... <2><5d>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter) <5e> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, ...): argv ... <62> DW_AT_type : <0x77> ... <2><6a>: Abbrev Number: 0 ... <1><77>: Abbrev Number: 6 (DW_TAG_pointer_type) <78> DW_AT_byte_size : 8 <79> DW_AT_type : <0x7d> <1><7d>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_base_type) <7e> DW_AT_byte_size : 1 <7f> DW_AT_encoding : 8 (unsigned char) <80> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, ...): character(kind=1) <1><84>: Abbrev Number: 7 (DW_TAG_subprogram) <85> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, ...): prog ... Ifx and flang do not emit any debug info for a wrapper main method so the type is missing here. There was the possibility of actually adding a character*1 type variable to the Fortran executable, but both, ifx and gfortran chose to emit this variable's type as a DW_TAG_string_type of length one (instead of a character(kind=1), or whatever the respective compiler naming convention is). While string types are printed as character*LENGHT in the fortran language part (e.g. when issuing a 'ptype') they do not generate any symbols inside GDB. In read.c it says /* These dies have a type, but processing them does not create a symbol or recurse to process the children. Therefore we can read them on-demand through read_type_die. */ So they did not add any output to 'info types'. Only flang did emit a character type here. As adding a type would have a) not solved the problem for ifx and would have b) somehow hidden the curious behavior of gfortran, instead, the check for this character type was chagened to optional with the check_optional_entry to allow for the symbols's absence and to allow flang and ifx to pass this test as well. Second, the line checked for s1 was hardcoded as 37 in the test. Given that the type is actually defined on line 41 (which is what is emitted by ifx) it even seems wrong. The line check for s1 was changed to actually check for 41 and a gfortran bug has been filed here https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105454 The test is now marked as xfail for gfortran. Third, the whole test of checking for the 'Type s1' in info types seemed questionable. The type s1 is declared iside the scope of the Fortran program info_types_test. Its DIE however is emitted as a child of the whole compilation unit making it visible outside of the program's scope. The 'info types' command checks for types stored in the GLOBAL_BLOCK, or STATIC_BLOCKm wgucm according to block.h The GLOBAL_BLOCK contains all the symbols defined in this compilation whose scope is the entire program linked together. The STATIC_BLOCK contains all the symbols whose scope is the entire compilation excluding other separate compilations. so for gfortran, the type shows up in the output of 'info types'. For flang and ifx on the other hand this is not the case. The two compilers emit the type (correctly) as a child of the Fortran program, thus not adding it to either, the GLOBAL_BLOCK nor the LOCAL_BLOCK. A bug has been opened for the gfortran scoping issue: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105454 While the most correct change might have been removing the check for s1, the change made here was to only check for this type in case of gfortran being used as the compiler, as this check also covers the declaration line issue mentioned above. A comment was added to maybe remove this check once the scoping issue is resolved (and it starts to fail with newer gfortran versions). The one used to test these changes was 13.0.
2022-05-31testsuite/lib: add check_optional_entry for GDBInfoSymbolsNils-Christian Kempke1-2/+16
There was already a similar functionality for the GDBInfoModuleSymbols. This just extends the GDBInfoSymbols. We will use this feature in a later commit to make a testcase less GNU specific and more flexible for other compilers. Namely, in gdb.fortran/info-types.exp currenlty GDBInfoSymbols::check_entry is used to verify and test the output of the info symbols command. The test, however was written with gfortran as a basis and some of the tests are not fair with e.g. ifx and ifort as they test for symbols that are not actually required to be emitted. The lines GDBInfoSymbols::check_entry "${srcfile}" "" "${character1}" and GDBInfoSymbols::check_entry "${srcfile}" "37" "Type s1;" check for types that are either not used in the source file (character1) or should not be emitted by the compiler at global scope (s1) thus no appearing in the info symbols command. In order to fix this we will later use the newly introduced check_optional_entry over check_entry.
2022-05-31testsuite, fortran: Add '-debug-parameters all' when using ifx/ifortNils-Christian Kempke1-0/+3
In order for ifx and ifort to emit all debug entries, even for unused parameters in modules we have to define the '-debug-parameters all' flag. This commit adds it to the ifx-*/ifort-* specific flags in gdb.exp.
2022-05-31testsuite, fortran: add compiler dependent types to dynamic-ptype-whatisNils-Christian Kempke1-38/+41
The test was earlier not using the compiler dependent type print system in fortran.exp. I changed this. It should generally improve the test performance for different compilers. For ifx and gfortran I do not see any failures.
2022-05-31testsuite, fortran: add required external keywordNils-Christian Kempke1-0/+1
Currenlty, ifx/ifort cannot compile the given executable as it is not valid Fortran. It is missing the external keyword on the no_arg_subroutine. Gfortran compiles the example but this is actually a bug and there is an open gcc ticket for this here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50377 Adding the keyword does not change the gfortran compiling of the example. It will, however, prevent a future fail once 50377 has been addressed.
2022-05-31gdb/testsuite: disable charset.exp for intel compilersNils-Christian Kempke1-0/+5
The test specifically tests for the Fortran CHARACTER(KIND=4) which is not available in ifx/ifort. Since the other characters are also printed elsewhere, we disable this test for the unsupported compilers.
2022-05-31gdb/testsuite: rename intel next gen c/cpp compilersNils-Christian Kempke2-2/+2
The name for icx and icpx in the testsuite was earlier set to 'intel-*' by the compiler identification. This commit changes this to 'icx-*'. Note, that currently these names are not used within the testsuite so no tests have to be adapted here.
2022-05-31gdb/testsuite: add Fortran compiler identification to GDBCristian Sandu11-70/+150
This commit adds a separate Fortran compiler identification mechanism to the testsuite, similar to the existing one for C/C++. Before this change, the options and version for the Fortran compiler specified when running the testsuite with F90_FOR_TARGET set, was detected via its respective C compiler. So running the testsuite as make check TEST=gdb.fortran/*.exp CC_FOR_TARGET=gcc F90_FOR_TARGET=ifx or even make check TEST=gdb.fortran/*.exp F90_FOR_TARGET=ifx would use the gcc compiler inside the procedures get_compiler_info and test_compiler_info to identify compiler flags and the compiler version. This could sometimes lead to unpredictable outputs. It also limited testsuite execution to combinations where C and Fortran compiler would come from the same family of compiers (gcc/gfortran, icc/ifort, icx/ifx, clang/flang ..). This commit enables GDB to detect C and Fortran compilers independently of each other. As most/nearly all Fortran compilers have a mechanism for preprocessing files in a C like fashion we added the exact same meachnism that already existed for C/CXX. We let GDB preprocess a file with the compilers Fortran preprocessor and evaluate the preprocessor defined macros in that file. This enables GDB to properly run heterogeneous combinations of C and Fortran compilers such as CC_FOR_TARGET='gcc' and F90_FOR_TARGET='ifort' or enables one to run the testsuite without specifying a C compiler as in make check TESTS=gdb.fortran/*.exp F90_FOR_TARGET='ifx' make check TESTS=gdb.fortran/*.exp F90_FOR_TARGET='flang' On the other hand this also requires one to always specify a identification mechanism for Fortran compilers in the compiler.F90 file. We added identification for GFORTRAN, FLANG (CLASSIC and LLVM) IFX, IFORT, and ARMFLANG for now. Classic and LLVM flang were each tested with their latest releases on their respective release pages. Both get recognized by the new compiler identification and we introduced the two names flang-classic and flang-llvm to distinguish the two. While LLVM flang is not quite mature enough yet for running the testsuite we still thought it would be a good idea to include it already. For this we added a case for the fortran_main procedure. LLVM flang uses 'MAIN__' as opposed to classic flang which uses 'MAIN_' here. We did not have the possibility to test ARMFLANG - the versioning scheme here was extracted from its latest online documentation. We changed the test_compiler_info procedure to take another optional argument, the language string, which will be passed though to the get_compiler_info procedure. Passing 'f90' or 'c++' here will then trigger the C++/Fortran compiler identification within get_compiler_info. The latter procedure was extended to also handle the 'f90' argument (similarly to the already existing 'c++' one). Co-authored-by: Nils-Christian Kempke <nils-christian.kempke@intel.com>
2022-05-31gdb/testsuite: move getting_compiler_info to front of gdb_compileNils-Christian Kempke1-7/+14
The procedure gdb_compile queries its options via [lsearch -exact $options getting_compiler_info] to check whether or not it was called in with the option getting_compiler_info. If it was called with this option it would preprocess some test input to try and figure out the actual compiler version of the compiler used. While doing this we cannot again try to figure out the current compiler version via the 'getting_compiler_info' option as this would cause infinite recursion. As some parts of the procedure do recursively test for the compiler version to e.g. set certain flags, at several places gdb_compile there are checks for the getting_compiler_info option needed. In the procedure, there was already a variable 'getting_compiler_info' which was set to the result of the 'lsearch' query and used instead of again and again looking for getting_compiler_info in the procedure options. But, this variable was actually set too late within the code. This lead to a mixture of querying 'getting_compiler_info' or doing an lserach on the options passed to the procedure. I found this inconsistent and instead moved the variable getting_compiler_info to the front of the procedure. It is set to true or false depending on whether or not the argument is found in the procedure's options (just as before) and queried instead of doing an lsearch on the procedure options in the rest of the procedure.
2022-05-31gdb/testsuite: Fix fortran types for Intel compilers.Felix Willgerodt1-0/+18
Newer Intel compilers emit their dwarf type name in a slightly different format. Therefore, this needs adjustment to make more tests pass in the Fortran testsuite. Co-authored-by: Abdul Basit Ijaz <abdul.b.ijaz@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Nils-Christian Kempke <nils-christian.kempke@intel.com>
2022-05-31gdb/testsuite: Use -module option for Intel Fortran compilersAbdul Basit Ijaz1-1/+5
The '-J' option is not supported in Intel compilers (ifx and ifort). The Intel version of the flag is '-module' which serves the same purpose.
2022-05-31gdb/testsuite: remove F77_FOR_TARGET supportNils-Christian Kempke5-37/+5
The last uses of the F77_FOR_TARGET via passing f77 to GDB's compile procedure were removed in this commit commit 0ecee54cfd04a60e7ca61ae07c72b20e21390257 Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> Date: Wed Jun 29 17:50:47 2011 +0000 over 10 years ago. The last .f files in the testsuite by now are all being compiled by passing 'f90' to the GDB compile, thus only actually using F90_FOR_TARGET (array-element.f, block-data.f, subarray.f). Gfortran in this case is backwards compatible with most f77 code as claimed on gcc.gnu.org/fortran. The reason we'd like to get rid of this now is, that we'll be implementing a Fortran compiler identification mechanism, similar to the C/Cpp existing ones. It would be using the Fortran preprocessor macro defines to identify the Fortran compiler version at hand. We found it inconsequent to only implement this for f90 but, on the other hand, f77 seems deprecated. So, with this commit we remove the remaining lines for its support.
2022-05-31Improve clear command's documentationPedro Alves1-10/+25
Co-Authored-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Change-Id: I9440052fd28f795d6f7c93a4576beadd21f28885
2022-05-31Clarify why we unit test matching symbol names with 0xff charactersPedro Alves1-4/+13
In the name matching unit tests in gdb/dwarf2/read.c, explain better why we test symbols with \377 / 0xff characters (Latin1 'ΓΏ'). Change-Id: I517f13adfff2e4d3cd783fec1d744e2b26e18b8e
2022-05-31Improve break-range's documentationPedro Alves1-7/+9
Change-Id: Iac26e1d2e7d8dc8a7d9516e6bdcc5c3fc4af45c8
2022-05-31Explicitly mention yet-unloaded shared libraries in location spec examplesPedro Alves1-2/+4
Change-Id: I05639ddb3bf620c7297b57ed286adc3aa926b7b6
2022-05-31sparc64 segfault in finish_dynamic_symbolAlan Modra1-1/+4
SYMBOL_REFERENCES_LOCAL can return true for undefined symbols. This can result in a segfault when running sparc64 ld/testsuite/ld-vsb tests that expect a failure. * elfxx-sparc.c (_bfd_sparc_elf_finish_dynamic_symbol): Don't access u.def.section on non-default visibility undefined symbol.
2022-05-31ia64 gas: Remove unnecessary initAlan Modra1-2/+0
The whole struct is cleared by alloc_record. * config/tc-ia64.c (output_prologue, output_prologue_gr): Don't zero r.record.r.mask.
2022-05-31v850_elf_set_note prototypeAlan Modra1-1/+1
v850_elf_set_note is declared using an unsigned int note param in elf32-v850.h but defined with enum c850_notes note in elf32-v850.c. Current mainline gcc is warning about this. Huh. * elf32-v850.c (v850_elf_set_note): Make "note" param an unsigned int.
2022-05-31Import libiberty from gccAlan Modra4-182/+294
PR 29200 include/ * ansidecl.h, * demangle.h: Import from gcc. libiberty/ * cp-demangle.c, * testsuite/demangle-expected: Import from gcc.
2022-05-31gdb/testsuite: resolve duplicate test name in gdb.trace/signal.expAndrew Burgess1-3/+7
Spotted a duplicate test name in gdb.trace/signal.exp, resolved in this commit by making use of 'with_test_prefix'.
2022-05-31Ajdust more tests for opcodes/i386: remove trailing whitespaceAlan Modra2-4/+4
git commit 202be274a4 also missed adjusting a few testsuite files. This fixes i686-vxworks +FAIL: VxWorks shared library test 1 i686-vxworks +FAIL: VxWorks executable test 1 (dynamic)
2022-05-31Trailing spaces in objdump -r headerAlan Modra206-242/+242
git commit 202be274a4 went a little wild in removing trailing spaces in gas/testsuite/gas/i386/{secidx.d,secrel.d}, causing x86_64-w64-mingw32 +FAIL: i386 secrel reloc x86_64-w64-mingw32 +FAIL: i386 secidx reloc I could have just replaced the trailing space, but let's fix the objdump output instead. Touches lots of testsuite files.
2022-05-31Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-05-30gdb/testsuite: fix gdb.trace/signal.exp on x86Simon Marchi1-1/+1
Patch 202be274a41a ("opcodes/i386: remove trailing whitespace from insns with zero operands") causes this regression: FAIL: gdb.trace/signal.exp: find syscall insn in kill It's because the test still expects to match a whitespace after the instruction, which the patch mentioned above removed. Remove the whitespaces for the regexp. Change-Id: Ie194273cc942bfd91332d4035f6eec55b7d3a428
2022-05-30gdb/manual: Introduce location specsPedro Alves3-191/+305
The current "Specify Location" section of the GDB manual starts with: "Several @value{GDBN} commands accept arguments that specify a location of your program's code." And then, such commands are documented as taking a "location" argument. For example, here's a representative subset: @item break @var{location} @item clear @var{location} @item until @var{location} @item list @var{location} @item edit @var{location} @itemx info line @var{location} @item info macros @var{location} @item trace @var{location} @item info scope @var{location} @item maint agent @r{[}-at @var{location}@r{,}@r{]} @var{expression} The issue here is that "location" isn't really correct for most of these commands. Instead, the "location" argument is really a placeholder that represent an umbrella term for all of the "linespecs", "explicit location", and "address location" input formats. GDB parses these and then finds the actual code locations (plural) in the program that match. For example, a "location" specified like "-function func" will actually match all the code locations in the program that correspond to the address/file/lineno of all the functions named "func" in all the loaded programs and shared libraries of all the inferiors. A location specified like "-function func -label lab" matches all the addresses of C labels named "lab" in all functions named "func". Etc. This means that several of the commands that claim they accept a "location", actually end up working with multiple locations, and the manual doesn't explain that all that well. In some cases, the command will work with all the resolved locations. In other cases, the command aborts with an error if the location specification resolves to multiple locations in the program. In other cases, GDB just arbitrarily and silently picks whatever is the first resolved code location (which sounds like should be improved). To clarify this, I propose we use the term "Location Specification", with shorthand "locaction spec", when we're talking about the user input, the argument or arguments that is/are passed to commands to instruct GDB how to find locations of interest. This is distinct from the actual code locations in the program, which are what GDB finds based on the user-specified location spec. Then use "location specification or the shorter "location spec" thoughout instead of "location" when we're talking about the user input. Thus, this commit does the following: - renames the "Specify Location" section of the manual to "Location Specifications". - It then introduces the term "Location Specification", with corresponding shorthand "location spec", as something distinct from an actual code location in the program. It explains what a concrete code location is. It explains that a location specification may be incomplete, and that may match multiple code locations in the program, or no code location at all. It gives examples. Some pre-existing examples were moved from the "Set Breaks" section, and a few new ones that didn't exist yet were added. I think it is better to have these centralized in this "Location Specification" section, since all the other commands that accept a location spec have an xref that points there. - Goes through the manual, and where "@var{location}" was used for a command argument, updated it to say "@var{locspec}" instead. At the same time, tweaks the description of the affected commands to describe what happens when the location spec resolves to more than one location. Most commands just did not say anything about that. One command -- "maint agent -at @var{location}" -- currently says it accepts a "location", suggesting it can accept address and explicit locations too, but that's incorrect. In reality, it only accepts linespecs, so fix it accordingly. One MI command -- "-trace-find line" -- currently says it accepts a "line specification", but it can accept address and explicit locations too, so fix it accordingly. Special thanks goes to Eli Zaretskii for reviews and rewording suggestions. Change-Id: Ic42ad8565e79ca67bfebb22cbb4794ea816fd08b
2022-05-30Move 64-bit BFD files from ALL_TARGET_OBS to ALL_64_TARGET_OBSLuis Machado1-6/+7
Doing a 32-bit build with "--enable-targets=all --disable-sim" fails to link properly. -- loongarch-tdep.o: In function `loongarch_gdbarch_init': binutils-gdb/gdb/loongarch-tdep.c:443: undefined reference to `loongarch_r_normal_name' loongarch-tdep.o: In function `loongarch_fetch_instruction': binutils-gdb/gdb/loongarch-tdep.c:37: undefined reference to `loongarch_insn_length' loongarch-tdep.o: In function `loongarch_scan_prologue(gdbarch*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long, frame_info*, trad_frame_cache*) [clone .isra.4]': binutils-gdb/gdb/loongarch-tdep.c:87: undefined reference to `loongarch_insn_length' binutils-gdb/gdb/loongarch-tdep.c:88: undefined reference to `loongarch_decode_imm' binutils-gdb/gdb/loongarch-tdep.c:89: undefined reference to `loongarch_decode_imm' binutils-gdb/gdb/loongarch-tdep.c:90: undefined reference to `loongarch_decode_imm' binutils-gdb/gdb/loongarch-tdep.c:91: undefined reference to `loongarch_decode_imm' binutils-gdb/gdb/loongarch-tdep.c:92: undefined reference to `loongarch_decode_imm' -- Given the list of 64-bit BFD files in opcodes/Makefile.am:TARGET64_LIBOPCODES_CFILES, it looks like GDB's ALL_TARGET_OBS list is including files that should be included in ALL_64_TARGET_OBS instead. This patch accomplishes this and enables a 32-bit build with "--enable-targets=all --disable-sim" to complete. Moving the bpf, tilegx and loongarch files to the correct list means GDB can find the correct disassembler function instead of finding a null pointer. We still need the "--disable-sim" switch (or "--enable-64-bit-bfd") to make a 32-bit build with "--enable-targets=all" complete correctly
2022-05-30Fix failing test for armeb-gnu-eabiLuis Machado1-18/+2
The following test fails on the armeb-gnu-eabi target: FAIL: Unwind information for Armv8.1-M.Mainline PACBTI extension This patch adjusts the expected output for big endian.
2022-05-30Use a union to avoid casts in bfd/doc/chew.cAlan Modra1-24/+41
This fixes -Wpedantic warnings in chew.c. Conversion between function and object pointers is not guaranteed. They can even be different sizes, not that we're likely to encounter build machines like that nowadays. PR 29194 * doc/chew.c (pcu): New union typedef. (dict_type, pc): Use it here. Adjust uses of pc. (add_to_definition): Make "word" param a pcu. Adjust all uses of function. (stinst_type): Delete.
2022-05-30use libiberty xmalloc in bfd/doc/chew.cAlan Modra3-12/+15
Catch out of memory. * doc/chew.c: Include libibery.h. (init_string_with_size, nextword): Replace malloc with xmalloc. (newentry, add_to_definition): Likewise. (catchar, catbuf): Replace realloc with xrealloc. (add_intrinsic): Replace strdup with xstrdup. * doc/local.mk (LIBIBERTY): Define. (chew): Link against libiberty. * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
2022-05-30Update K&R functions in bfd/doc/chew.cAlan Modra1-162/+62
* doc/chew.c: Update function definitions to ISO C, remove now unnecessary prototypes.
2022-05-30Reorganise bfd/doc/chew.c a littleAlan Modra1-64/+38
This also removes some unused variables, and deletes support for the "var" keyword which isn't used and was broken. (No means to set variables, and add_var used push_number inconsistent with its use elsewhere.) * doc/chew.c: Move typedefs before variables, variables before functions. (die): Move earlier. (word_type, sstack, ssp): Delete. (dict_type): Delete var field. (add_var): Delete. (compile): Remove "var" support.
2022-05-30RISC-V: Add zhinx extension supports.jiawei5-62/+204
The zhinx extension is a sub-extension in zfinx, corresponding to zfh extension but use GPRs instead of FPRs. This patch expanded the zfh insn class define, since zfh and zhinx use the same opcodes, thanks for Nelson's works. changelog in V2: Add missing classes of 'zfh' and 'zhinx' in "riscv_multi_subset_supports_ext". bfd/ChangeLog: * elfxx-riscv.c (riscv_multi_subset_supports): New extensions. (riscv_multi_subset_supports_ext): New extensions. gas/ChangeLog: * testsuite/gas/riscv/fp-zhinx-insns.d: New test. * testsuite/gas/riscv/fp-zhinx-insns.s: New test. include/ChangeLog: * opcode/riscv.h (enum riscv_insn_class): New INSN classes. opcodes/ChangeLog: * riscv-opc.c: Modify INSN_CLASS.
2022-05-30Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-05-29Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-05-28gdb/python: improve formatting of help text for user defined commandsAndrew Burgess6-0/+507
Consider this command defined in Python (in the file test-cmd.py): class test_cmd (gdb.Command): """ This is the first line. Indented second line. This is the third line. """ def __init__ (self): super ().__init__ ("test-cmd", gdb.COMMAND_OBSCURE) def invoke (self, arg, from_tty): print ("In test-cmd") test_cmd() Now, within a GDB session: (gdb) source test-cmd.py (gdb) help test-cmd This is the first line. Indented second line. This is the third line. (gdb) I think there's three things wrong here: 1. The leading blank line, 2. The trailing blank line, and 3. Every line is indented from the left edge slightly. The problem of course, is that GDB is using the Python doc string verbatim as its help text. While the user has formatted the help text so that it appears clear within the .py file, this means that the text appear less well formatted when displayed in the "help" output. The same problem can be observed for gdb.Parameter objects in their set/show output. In this commit I aim to improve the "help" output for commands and parameters. To do this I have added gdbpy_fix_doc_string_indentation, a new function that rewrites the doc string text following the following rules: 1. Leading blank lines are removed, 2. Trailing blank lines are removed, and 3. Leading whitespace is removed in a "smart" way such that the relative indentation of lines is retained. With this commit in place the above example now looks like this: (gdb) source ~/tmp/test-cmd.py (gdb) help test-cmd This is the first line. Indented second line. This is the third line. (gdb) Which I think is much neater. Notice that the indentation of the second line is retained. Any blank lines within the help text (not leading or trailing) will be retained. I've added a NEWS entry to note that there has been a change in behaviour, but I didn't update the manual. The existing manual is suitably vague about how the doc string is used, so I think the new behaviour is covered just as well by the existing text.
2022-05-28gdb: use gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> for docs in cmdpy_initAndrew Burgess1-8/+7
Make use of gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> to hold the documentation string in cmdpy_init (when creating a custom GDB command in Python). I think this is all pretty straight forward, the only slight weirdness is the removal of the call to free toward the end of this function. Prior to this commit, if an exception was thrown after the GDB command was created then we would (I think) end up freeing the documentation string even though the command would remain registered with GDB, which would surely lead to undefined behaviour. After this commit we release the doc string at the point that we hand it over to the command creation routines. If we throw _after_ the command has been created within GDB then the doc string will be left live. If we throw during the command creation itself (either from add_prefix_cmd or add_cmd) then it is up to those functions to free the doc string (I suspect we don't, but I think in general the commands are pretty bad at cleaning up after themselves, so I don't think this is a huge problem).
2022-05-27gprofng: fix build with -mx32Vladimir Mezentsev5-19/+21
gprofng/ChangeLog 2022-05-27 Vladimir Mezentsev <vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com> PR gprofng/28983 PR gprofng/29143 * src/Experiment.cc (write_header): Fix argument for ctime. Fix -Wformat= warnings. * src/Dbe.cc: Likewise. * src/DwarfLib.h: Fix [-Wsign-compare] warnings. * src/Experiment.h: Likewise. * src/ipc.cc: Fix -Wformat= warnings.
2022-05-28Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-05-27Fix crash with "maint print arc"Tom Tromey1-5/+5
Luis noticed that "maint print arc" would crash, because the command handler did not find "show" in the command name, violating an invariant. This patch fixes the bug by changing the registration to use add_basic_prefix_cmd instead.
2022-05-27opcodes/i386: remove trailing whitespace from insns with zero operandsAndrew Burgess273-1837/+1854
While working on another patch[1] I had need to touch this code in i386-dis.c: ins->obufp = ins->mnemonicendp; for (i = strlen (ins->obuf) + prefix_length; i < 6; i++) oappend (ins, " "); oappend (ins, " "); (*ins->info->fprintf_styled_func) (ins->info->stream, dis_style_mnemonic, "%s", ins->obuf); What this code does is add whitespace after the instruction mnemonic and before the instruction operands. The problem I ran into when working on this code can be seen by assembling this input file: .text nop retq Now, when I disassemble, here's the output. I've replaced trailing whitespace with '_' so that the issue is clearer: Disassembly of section .text: 0000000000000000 <.text>: 0: 90 nop 1: c3 retq___ Notice that there's no trailing whitespace after 'nop', but there are three spaces after 'retq'! What happens is that instruction mnemonics are emitted into a buffer instr_info::obuf, then instr_info::mnemonicendp is setup to point to the '\0' character at the end of the mnemonic. When we emit the whitespace, this is then added starting at the mnemonicendp position. Lets consider 'retq', first the buffer is setup like this: 'r' 'e' 't' 'q' '\0' Then we add whitespace characters at the '\0', converting the buffer to this: 'r' 'e' 't' 'q' ' ' ' ' ' ' '\0' However, 'nop' is actually an alias for 'xchg %rax,%rax', so, initially, the buffer is setup like this: 'x' 'c' 'h' 'g' '\0' Then in NOP_Fixup we spot that we have an instruction that is an alias for 'nop', and adjust the buffer to this: 'n' 'o' 'p' '\0' '\0' The second '\0' is left over from the original buffer contents. However, when we rewrite the buffer, we don't afjust mnemonicendp, which still points at the second '\0' character. Now, when we insert whitespace we get: 'n' 'o' 'p' '\0' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '\0' Notice the whitespace is inserted after the first '\0', so, when we print the buffer, the whitespace is not printed. The fix for this is pretty easy, I can change NOP_Fixup to adjust mnemonicendp, but now a bunch of tests start failing, we now produce whitespace after the 'nop', which the tests don't expect. So, I could update the tests to expect the whitespace.... ...except I'm not a fan of trailing whitespace, so I'd really rather not. Turns out, I can pretty easily update the whitespace emitting code to spot instructions that have zero operands and just not emit any whitespace in this case. So this is what I've done. I've left in the fix for NOP_Fixup, I think updating mnemonicendp is probably a good thing, though this is not really required any more. I've then updated all the tests that I saw failing to adjust the expected patterns to account for the change in whitespace. [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-April/120610.html
2022-05-27Replace bfd_hostptr_t with uintptr_tAlan Modra14-72/+50
bfd_hostptr_t is defined as a type large enough to hold either a long or a pointer. It mostly appears in the coff backend code in casts. include/coff/internal.h struct internal_syment and union internal_auxent have the only uses in data structures, where comparison with include/coff/external.h and other code reveals that the type only needs to be large enough for a 32-bit integer or a pointer. That should mean replacing with uintptr_t is OK.