aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-04-11[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.base/annota1.exp with pieTom de Vries1-0/+2
Since commit 359efc2d894 ("[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.base/annota1.exp more robust") we see this fail with target board unix/-fPIE/-pie: ... FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: run until main breakpoint (timeout) ... The problem is that the commit makes the number and order of matched annotations fixed, while between target boards unix and unix/-fPIE/-pie there is a difference: ... \032\032post-prompt Starting program: outputs/gdb.base/annota1/annota1 +\032\032breakpoints-invalid + \032\032starting \032\032frames-invalid ... Fix this by optionally matching the additional annotation. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-04-11[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lines.exp for m32 pieTom de Vries1-1/+1
As reported in PR29043, when running test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lines.exp with target board unix/-m32/-fPIE/-pie, we run into: ... Breakpoint 2, 0x56555540 in bar ()^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lines.exp: cv=2: cdw=32: lv=2: ldw=32: \ continue to breakpoint: foo \(1\) next^M Single stepping until exit from function bar,^M which has no line number information.^M 0x56555587 in main ()^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lines.exp: cv=2: cdw=32: lv=2: ldw=32: \ next to foo (2) ... The problem is that the bar breakpoint ends up at an unexpected location because: - the synthetic debug info is incomplete and doesn't provide line info for the prologue part of the function, so consequently gdb uses the i386 port prologue skipper to get past the prologue - the i386 port prologue skipper doesn't get past a get_pc_thunk call. Work around this in the test-case by breaking on bar_label instead. Tested on x86_64-linux with target boards unix, unix/-m32, unix/-fPIE/-pie and unix/-m32/-fPIE/-pie.
2022-04-11Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-04-10Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-04-09Remove MSYMBOL_VALUE_CHAINTom Tromey1-1/+0
I noticed that MSYMBOL_VALUE_CHAIN is unused, so this patch removes it.
2022-04-09Rearrange struct bfd_section a littleAlan Modra2-34/+34
For better packing on 64-bit hosts. * section.c (struct bfd_section): Move next and prev field earlier. Move alignment_power later. (BFD_FAKE_SECTION): Adjust to suit. * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate.
2022-04-09Don't run pr27228 test for hppaAlan Modra1-1/+1
As the comment says, hppa doesn't support use of BFD_RELOC_* in .reloc directives. Using xfail can result in a spurious XPASS result as BFD_RELOC values change. * testsuite/gas/elf/pr27228.d: Change xfail to notarget for hppa.
2022-04-09Correct nds32 readelf reloc numbersAlan Modra1-7/+7
* readelf.c (is_32bit_abs_reloc, is_16bit_abs_reloc): Comment fixes. (is_none_reloc): Correct nds32 reloc numbers.
2022-04-09Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-04-08gas: Port "copy st_size only if unset" to aarch64 and riscvFangrui Song3-21/+22
And disable the new test gas/elf/size.s for alpha which uses its own .set, for hppa*-*-hpux* which does not allow .size before declaration.
2022-04-08gprofng: fprintf_styled_func not inizialized for disassemblerVladimir Mezentsev2-0/+25
gprofng/ChangeLog 2022-04-07 Vladimir Mezentsev <vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com> * libcollector/unwind.c: inizialize fprintf_styled_func. * src/Disasm.cc: Likewise.
2022-04-08gprofng: zlib handlingVladimir Mezentsev7-23/+71
gprofng/ChangeLog 2022-04-06 Vladimir Mezentsev <vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com> * configure.ac: Add AM_ZLIB. * src/Makefile.am: Add $(ZLIBINC) and $(ZLIB). * gprofng/src/DbeSession.h: Likewise. * configure: Regenerate. * Makefile.in: Regenerate. * doc/Makefile.in: Regenerate. * gp-display-html/Makefile.in: Regenerate. * src/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
2022-04-08gdb: Avoid undefined shifts, fix Go shiftsPedro Alves2-4/+467
I noticed that a build of GDB with GCC + --enable-ubsan, testing against GDBserver showed this GDB crash: (gdb) PASS: gdb.trace/trace-condition.exp: trace: 0x00abababcdcdcdcd << 46 == 0x7373400000000000: advance to trace begin tstart ../../src/gdb/valarith.c:1365:15: runtime error: left shift of 48320975398096333 by 46 places cannot be represented in type 'long int' ERROR: GDB process no longer exists GDB process exited with wait status 269549 exp9 0 1 UNRESOLVED: gdb.trace/trace-condition.exp: trace: 0x00abababcdcdcdcd << 46 == 0x7373400000000000: start trace experiment The problem is that, "0x00abababcdcdcdcd << 46" is an undefined signed left shift, because the result is not representable in the type of the lhs, which is signed. This actually became defined in C++20, and if you compile with "g++ -std=c++20 -Wall", you'll see that GCC no longer warns about it, while it warns if you specify prior language versions. While at it, there are a couple other situations that are undefined (and are still undefined in C++20) and result in GDB dying: shifting by a negative ammount, or by >= than the bit size of the promoted lhs. For the latter, GDB shifts using (U)LONGEST internally, so you have to shift by >= 64 bits to see it: $ gdb --batch -q -ex "p 1 << -1" ../../src/gdb/valarith.c:1365:15: runtime error: shift exponent -1 is negative $ # gdb exited $ gdb --batch -q -ex "p 1 << 64" ../../src/gdb/valarith.c:1365:15: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int' $ # gdb exited Also, right shifting a negative value is implementation-defined (before C++20, after which it is defined). For this, I chose to change nothing in GDB other than adding tests, as I don't really know whether we need to do anything. AFAIK, most implementations do an arithmetic right shift, and it may be we don't support any host or target that behaves differently. Plus, this becomes defined in C++20 exactly as arithmetic right shift. Compilers don't error out on such shifts, at best they warn, so I think GDB should just continue doing the shifts anyhow too. Thus: - Adjust scalar_binop to avoid the undefined paths, either by adding explicit result paths, or by casting the lhs of the left shift to unsigned, as appropriate. For the shifts by a too-large count, I made the result be what you'd get if you split the large count in a series of smaller shifts. Thus: Left shift, positive or negative lhs: V << 64 => V << 16 << 16 << 16 << 16 => 0 Right shift, positive lhs: Vpos >> 64 => Vpos >> 16 >> 16 >> 16 >> 16 => 0 Right shift, negative lhs: Vneg >> 64 => Vneg >> 16 >> 16 >> 16 >> 16 => -1 This is actually Go's semantics (the compiler really emits instructions to make it so that you get 0 or -1 if you have a too-large shift). So for that language GDB does the shift and nothing else. For other C-like languages where such a shift is undefined, GDB warns in addition to performing the shift. For shift by a negative count, for Go, this is a hard error. For other languages, since their compilers only warn, I made GDB warn too. The semantics I chose (we're free to pick them since this is undefined behavior) is as-if you had shifted by the count cast to unsigned, thus as if you had shifted by a too-large count, thus the same as the previous scenario illustrated above. Examples: (gdb) set language go (gdb) p 1 << 100 $1 = 0 (gdb) p -1 << 100 $2 = 0 (gdb) p 1 >> 100 $3 = 0 (gdb) p -1 >> 100 $4 = -1 (gdb) p -2 >> 100 $5 = -1 (gdb) p 1 << -1 left shift count is negative (gdb) set language c (gdb) p -2 >> 100 warning: right shift count >= width of type $6 = -1 (gdb) p -2 << 100 warning: left shift count >= width of type $7 = 0 (gdb) p 1 << -1 warning: left shift count is negative $8 = 0 (gdb) p -1 >> -1 warning: right shift count is negative $9 = -1 - The warnings' texts are the same as what GCC prints. - Add comprehensive tests in a new gdb.base/bitshift.exp testcase, so that we exercise all these scenarios. Change-Id: I8bcd5fa02de3114b7ababc03e65702d86ec8d45d
2022-04-08Fix undefined behavior in the Fortran, Go and Pascal number parsersPedro Alves6-44/+93
This commit ports these two fixes to the C parser: commit ebf13736b42af47c9907b5157c8e80c78dbe00e1 CommitDate: Thu Sep 4 21:46:28 2014 +0100 parse_number("0") reads uninitialized memory commit 20562150d8a894bc91657c843ee88c508188e32e CommitDate: Wed Oct 3 15:19:06 2018 -0600 Avoid undefined behavior in parse_number ... to the Fortran, Go, and Fortran number parsers, fixing the same problems there. Also add a new testcase that exercises printing 0xffffffffffffffff (max 64-bit) in all languages, which crashes a GDB built with UBsan without the fix. I moved get_set_option_choices out of all-architectures.exp.tcl to common code to be able to extract all the supported languages. I did a tweak to it to generalize it a bit -- you now have to pass down the "set" part of the command as well. This is so that the proc can be used with "maintenance set" commands as well in future. Change-Id: I8e8f2fdc1e8407f63d923c26fd55d98148b9e16a
2022-04-08Debug info for function in Windows PE binary on wrong instructionNick Clifton2-1/+7
PR 29038 * coffgen.c (coff_find_nearest_line_with_names): Fix typo retrieving saved bias.
2022-04-08Pass PKG_CONFIG_PATH down from top-level MakefileSimon Marchi5-0/+17
[Sending to binutils, gdb-patches and gcc-patches, since it touches the top-level Makefile/configure] I have my debuginfod library installed in a non-standard location (/opt/debuginfod), which requires me to set PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/debuginfod/lib/pkg-config. If I just set it during configure: $ PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/debuginfod/lib/pkg-config ./configure --with-debuginfod $ make or $ ./configure --with-debuginfod PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/debuginfod/lib/pkg-config $ make Then PKG_CONFIG_PATH is only present (and ignored) during the top-level configure. When running make (which runs gdb's and binutils' configure), PKG_CONFIG_PATH is not set, which results in their configure script not finding the library: checking for libdebuginfod >= 0.179... no configure: error: "--with-debuginfod was given, but libdebuginfod is missing or unusable." Change the top-level configure/Makefile system to capture the value passed when configuring the top-level and pass it down to subdirectories (similar to CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, etc). I don't know much about the top-level build system, so I really don't know if I did this correctly. The changes are: - Use AC_SUBST(PKG_CONFIG_PATH) in configure.ac, so that @PKG_CONFIG_PATH@ gets replaced with the actual PKG_CONFIG_PATH value in config files (i.e. Makefile) - Add a PKG_CONFIG_PATH Makefile variable in Makefile.tpl, initialized to @PKG_CONFIG_PATH@ - Add PKG_CONFIG_PATH to HOST_EXPORTS in Makefile.tpl, which are the variables set when running the sub-configures I initially added PKG_CONFIG_PATH to flags_to_pass, in Makefile.def, but I don't think it's needed. AFAIU, this defines the flags to pass down when calling "make" in subdirectories. We only need PKG_CONFIG_PATH to be passed down during configure. After that, it's captured in gdb/config.status, so even if a "make" causes a re-configure later (because gdb/configure has changed, for example), the PKG_CONFIG_PATH value will be remembered. ChangeLog: * configure.ac: Add AC_SUBST(PKG_CONFIG_PATH). * configure: Re-generate. * Makefile.tpl (HOST_EXPORTS): Pass PKG_CONFIG_PATH. (PKG_CONFIG_PATH): New. * Makefile.in: Re-generate. Change-Id: I91138dfca41c43b05e53e445f62e4b27882536bf
2022-04-08gdb/testsuite: use nopie in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inline-param.expSimon Marchi1-3/+5
I see this failure: (gdb) run ^M Starting program: /home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inline-param/dw2-inline-param ^M Warning:^M Cannot insert breakpoint 1.^M Cannot access memory at address 0x113b^M ^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inline-param.exp: runto: run to *0x113b The test loads the binary in GDB, grabs the address of a symbol, strips the binary, reloads it in GDB, runs the program, and then tries to place a breakpoint at that address. The problem is that the binary is built as position independent, so the address GDB grabs in the first place isn't where the code ends up after running. Fix this by linking the binary as non-position-independent. The alternative would be to compute the relocated address where to place the breakpoint, but that's not very straightforward, unfortunately. I was confused for a while, I was trying to load the binary in GDB manually to get the symbol address, but GDB was telling me the symbol could not be found. Meanwhile, it clearly worked in gdb.log. The thing is that GDB strips the binary in-place, so we don't have access to the intermediary binary with symbols. Change the test to output the stripped binary to a separate file instead. Change-Id: I66c56293df71b1ff49cf748d6784bd0e935211ba
2022-04-08gdb maintainer commit rightsAlan Modra1-1/+5
Formalise what ought to be obvious. The top level of the binutils-gdb repository isn't owned by binutils. * MAINTAINERS: Spelling fix. GDB global maintainer rights.
2022-04-08gdb/fortran: print fortran extended types with ptypeBernhard Heckel3-19/+81
Add the print of the base-class of an extended type to the output of ptype. This requires the Fortran compiler to emit DW_AT_inheritance for the extended type. Co-authored-by: Nils-Christian Kempke <nils-christian.kempke@intel.com>
2022-04-08gdb/fortran: add support for accessing fields of extended typesBernhard Heckel4-2/+242
Fortran 2003 supports type extension. This patch allows access to inherited members by using their fully qualified name as described in the Fortran standard. In doing so the patch also fixes a bug in GDB when trying to access the members of a base class in a derived class via the derived class' base class member. This patch fixes PR22497 and PR26373 on GDB side. Using the example Fortran program from PR22497 program mvce implicit none type :: my_type integer :: my_int end type my_type type, extends(my_type) :: extended_type end type extended_type type(my_type) :: foo type(extended_type) :: bar foo%my_int = 0 bar%my_int = 1 print*, foo, bar end program mvce and running this with GDB and setting a BP at 17: Before: (gdb) p bar%my_type A syntax error in expression, near `my_type'. (gdb) p bar%my_int There is no member named my_int. (gdb) p bar%my_type%my_int A syntax error in expression, near `my_type%my_int'. (gdb) p bar $1 = ( my_type = ( my_int = 1 ) ) After: (gdb) p bar%my_type $1 = ( my_int = 1 ) (gdb) p bar%my_int $2 = 1 # this line requires DW_TAG_inheritance to work (gdb) p bar%my_type%my_int $3 = 1 (gdb) p bar $4 = ( my_type = ( my_int = 1 ) ) In the above example "p bar%my_int" requires the compiler to emit information about the inheritance relationship between extended_type and my_type which gfortran and flang currently do not de. The respective issue gcc/49475 has been put as kfail. Co-authored-by: Nils-Christian Kempke <nils-christian.kempke@intel.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26373 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22497
2022-04-08gdb: add Nils-Christian Kempke to gdb/MAINTAINERSNils-Christian Kempke1-0/+1
Signed-off-by: Nils-Christian Kempke <nils-christian.kempke@intel.com>
2022-04-07gdb: change file_file_name to return an std::stringSimon Marchi3-18/+10
Straightforward change, return an std::string instead of a gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char>. No behavior change expected. Change-Id: Ia5e94c94221c35f978bb1b7bdffbff7209e0520e
2022-04-08Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-04-07gdb/fortran: fix fetching assumed rank array contentAndrew Burgess3-23/+49
Commit: commit df7a7bdd9766adebc6b117c31bc617d81c1efd43 Date: Thu Mar 17 18:56:23 2022 +0000 gdb: add support for Fortran's ASSUMED RANK arrays Added support for Fortran assumed rank arrays. Unfortunately, this commit contained a bug that means though GDB can correctly calculate the rank of an assumed rank array, GDB can't fetch the contents of an assumed rank array. The history of this patch can be seen on the mailing list here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-January/185306.html The patches that were finally committed can be found here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-March/186906.html The original patches did support fetching the array contents, it was only the later series that introduced the regression. The problem is that when calculating the array rank the result is a count of the number of ranks, i.e. this is a 1 based result, 1, 2, 3, etc. In contrast, when computing the details of any particular rank the value passed to the DWARF expression evaluator should be a 0 based rank offset, i.e. a 0 based number, 0, 1, 2, etc. In the patches that were originally merged, this was not the case, and we were passing the 1 based rank number to the expression evaluator, e.g. passing 1 when we should pass 0, 2 when we should pass 1, etc. As a result the DWARF expression evaluator was reading the wrong (undefined) memory, and returning garbage results. In this commit I have extended the test case to cover checking the array contents, I've then ensured we make use of the correct rank value, and extended some comments, and added or adjusted some asserts as appropriate.
2022-04-07gdb/testsuite: add "macros" option to gdb_compileSimon Marchi5-48/+22
Make gdb_compile handle a new "macros" option, which makes it pass the appropriate flag to make the compiler include macro information in the debug info. This will help simplify tests using macros, reduce redundant code, and make it easier to add support for a new compiler. Right now it only handles clang specially (using -fdebug-macro) and falls back to -g3 otherwise (which works for gcc). Other compilers can be added as needed. There are some tests that are currently skipped if the compiler is nor gcc nor clang. After this patch, the tests will attempt to run (the -g3 fall back will be used). That gives a chance to people using other compilers to notice something is wrong and maybe add support for their compiler. If it is needed to support a compiler that doesn't have a way to include macro information, then we can always introduce a "skip_macro_tests" that can be used to skip over them. Change-Id: I50cd6ab1bfbb478c1005486408e214b551364c9b
2022-04-07gdb: remove subfile::buildsym_compunit fieldSimon Marchi2-3/+0
It is only set, never used. Change-Id: Ia46ed2f9da243b0ccfc4588c1b57be2a0f3939de
2022-04-07[gdb/testsuite] Make gdb.base/annota1.exp more robustTom de Vries1-24/+47
On openSUSE Tumbleweed I run into: ... FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: run until main breakpoint (timeout) ... The problem is that the libthread_db message occurs at a location where it's not expected: ... Starting program: outputs/gdb.base/annota1/annota1 ^M ^M ^Z^Zstarting^M ^M ^Z^Zframes-invalid^M [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]^M Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".^M ^M ^Z^Zbreakpoints-invalid^M ^M ... Fix this by making the matching more robust: - rewrite the regexp such that each annotation is on a single line, starting with \r\n\032\032 and ending with \r\n - add a regexp variable optional_re, that matches all possible optional output, and use it as a separator in the first part of the regexp Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-04-07gdb/testsuite/dwarf: simplify line number program syntaxSimon Marchi26-683/+681
By calling `uplevel $body` in the program proc (a pattern we use at many places), we can get rid of curly braces around each line number program directive. That seems like a nice small improvement to me. Change-Id: Ib327edcbffbd4c23a08614adee56c12ea25ebc0b
2022-04-07gdb/testsuite/dwarf: remove two unused variablesSimon Marchi1-19/+0
These variables seem to be unused, remove them. Change-Id: I7d613d9d35735930ee78b2c348943c73a702afbb
2022-04-07gdb: remove symtab::pspaceSimon Marchi5-32/+31
Same idea as previous patch, but for symtab::pspace. Change-Id: I1023abe622bea75ef648c6a97a01b53775d4104d
2022-04-07gdb: remove symtab::objfileSimon Marchi16-45/+41
Same idea as previous patch, but for symtab::objfile. I find it clearer without this wrapper, as it shows that the objfile is common to all symtabs of a given compunit. Otherwise, you could think that each symtab (of a given compunit) can have a specific objfile. Change-Id: Ifc0dbc7ec31a06eefa2787c921196949d5a6fcc6
2022-04-07gdb: remove symtab::blockvectorSimon Marchi14-36/+33
symtab::blockvector is a wrapper around compunit_symtab::blockvector. It is a bit misleadnig, as it gives the impression that a symtab has a blockvector. Remove it, change all users to fetch the blockvector through the compunit instead. Change-Id: Ibd062cd7926112a60d52899dff9224591cbdeebf
2022-04-07gdb: remove symtab::dirnameSimon Marchi4-19/+12
I think the symtab::dirname method is bogus, or at least very misleading. It makes you think that it returns the directory that was used to find that symtab's file during compilation (i.e. the directory the file refers to in the DWARF line header file table), or the directory part of the symtab's filename maybe. In fact, it returns the compilation unit's directory, which is the CWD of the compiler, at compilation time. At least for DWARF, if the symtab's filename is relative, it will be relative to that directory. But if the symtab's filename is absolute, then the directory returned by symtab::dirname has nothing to do with the symtab's filename. Remove symtab::dirname to avoid this confusion, change all users to fetch the same information through the compunit. At least, it will be clear that this is a compunit property, not a symtab property. Change-Id: I2894c3bf3789d7359a676db3c58be2c10763f5f0
2022-04-07gdb/testsuite: make gdb_breakpoint and runto take a linespecSimon Marchi1-11/+13
Change gdb_breakpoint to accept a linespec, not just a function. In fact, no behavior changes are necessary, this only changes the parameter name and documentation. Change runto as well, since the two are so close (runto forwards all its arguments to gdb_breakpoint). I wrote this for a downstrean GDB port, but thought it could be useful upstream, eventually, even though not callers take advantage of it yet. Change-Id: I08175fd444d5a60df90fd9985e1b5dfd87c027cc
2022-04-07gdb: update comments throughout reggroups.{c,h} filesAndrew Burgess2-4/+21
This commit updates the comments in the gdb/reggroups.{c,h} files. Fill in some missing comments, correct a few comments that were not clear, and where we had comments duplicated between .c and .h files, update the .c to reference the .h. No user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: move struct reggroup into reggroups.h headerAndrew Burgess9-57/+36
Move 'struct reggroup' into the reggroups.h header. Remove the reggroup_name and reggroup_type accessor functions, and just use the name/type member functions within 'struct reggroup', update all uses of these removed functions. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: convert reggroup to a C++ class with constructor, etcAndrew Burgess1-18/+30
Convert the 'struct reggroup' into a real class, with a constructor and getter methods. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: make the pre-defined register groups constAndrew Burgess3-23/+23
Convert the 7 global, pre-defined, register groups const, and fix the fall out (a minor tweak required in riscv-tdep.c). There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: more 'const' in gdb/reggroups.{c,h}Andrew Burgess10-38/+39
Convert the reggroup_new and reggroup_gdbarch_new functions to return a 'const regggroup *', and fix up all the fallout. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: remove reggroup_next and reggroup_prevAndrew Burgess7-154/+84
Add a new function gdbarch_reggroups that returns a reference to a vector containing all the reggroups for an architecture. Make use of this function throughout GDB instead of the existing reggroup_next and reggroup_prev functions. Finally, delete the reggroup_next and reggroup_prev functions. Most of these changes are pretty straight forward, using range based for loops instead of the old style look using reggroup_next. There are two places where the changes are less straight forward. In gdb/python/py-registers.c, the register group iterator needed to change slightly. As the iterator is tightly coupled to the gdbarch, I just fetch the register group vector from the gdbarch when needed, and use an index counter to find the next item from the vector when needed. In gdb/tui/tui-regs.c the tui_reg_next and tui_reg_prev functions are just wrappers around reggroup_next and reggroup_prev respectively. I've just inlined the logic of the old functions into the tui functions. As the tui function had its own special twist (wrap around behaviour) I think this is OK. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: convert reggroups to use a std::vectorAndrew Burgess1-76/+75
Replace manual linked list with a std::vector. This commit doesn't change the reggroup_next and reggroup_prev API, but that will change in a later commit. This commit is focused on the minimal changes needed to manage the reggroups using a std::vector, without changing the API exposed by the reggroup.c file. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: always add the default register groupsAndrew Burgess13-138/+36
There's a set of 7 default register groups. If we don't add any gdbarch specific register groups during gdbarch initialisation, then when we iterate over the register groups using reggroup_next and reggroup_prev we will make use of these 7 default groups. See the use of default_groups in gdb/reggroups.c for details on this. However, if the gdbarch adds its own groups during gdbarch initialisation, then these groups will be used in preference to the default groups. A problem arises though if the particular architecture makes use of the target description mechanism. If the default target description(s) (i.e. those internal to GDB that are used when the user doesn't provide their own) don't mention any additional register groups then the default register groups will be used. But if the target description does mention additional groups then the default groups are not used, and instead, the groups from the target description are used. The problem with this is that what usually happens is that the target description will mention additional groups, e.g. groups for special registers. Most architectures that use target descriptions work around this by adding all (or most) of the default register groups in all cases. See i386_add_reggroups, aarch64_add_reggroups, riscv_add_reggroups, xtensa_add_reggroups, and others. In this patch, my suggestion is that we should just add the default register groups for every architecture, always. This change is in gdb/reggroups.c. All the remaining changes are me updating the various architectures to not add the default groups themselves. So, where will this change be visible to the user? I think the following commands will possibly change: * info registers / info all-registers: The user can provide a register group to these commands. For example, on csky, we previously never added the 'vector' group. Now, as a default group, this will be available, but (presumably) will not contain any registers. I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing, there's something to be said for having some consistent defaults available. There are other architectures that didn't add all 7 of the defaults, which will now have gained additional groups. * maint print reggroups This prints the set of all available groups. As a maintenance command I'm less concerned with the output changing here. Obviously, for the architectures that didn't previously add all the defaults, this list just got bigger. * maint print register-groups This prints all the registers, and the groups they are in. If the defaults were not previously being added then a register (obviously) can't appear in one of the default groups. Now the groups are available then registers might be in more groups than previously. However, this is again a maintenance command, so I'm less concerned about this changing.
2022-04-07gdb/tui: fix 'tui reg next/prev' command when data window is hiddenAndrew Burgess2-20/+40
Start GDB like: $ gdb -q executable (gdb) start (gdb) layout src ... tui windows are now displayed ... (gdb) tui reg next At this point the data (register) window should be displayed, but will contain the message 'Register Values Unavailable', and at the console you'll see the message "unknown register group 'next'". The same happens with 'tui reg prev' (but the error message is slightly different). At this point you can continue to use 'tui reg next' and/or 'tui reg prev' and you'll keep getting the error message. The problem is that when the data (register) window is first displayed, it's current register group is nullptr. As a consequence tui_reg_next and tui_reg_prev (tui/tui-regs.c) will always just return nullptr, which triggers an error in tui_reg_command. In this commit I change tui_reg_next and tui_reg_prev so that they instead return the first and last register group respectively if the current register group is nullptr. So, after this, using 'tui reg next' will (in the above case) show the first register group, while 'tui reg prev' will display the last register group.
2022-04-07gdb/tui: avoid theoretical bug with 'tui reg' commandAndrew Burgess1-11/+13
While looking at the 'tui reg' command as part of another patch, I spotted a theoretical bug. The 'tui reg' command takes the name of a register group, but also handles partial register group matches, though the partial match has to be unique. The current command logic goes: With the code as currently written, if a target description named a register group either 'prev' or 'next' then GDB would see this as an ambiguous register name, and refuse to switch groups. Naming a register group 'prev' or 'next' seems pretty unlikely, but, by adding a single else block we can prevent this problem. Now, if there's a 'prev' or 'next' register group, the user will not be able to select the group directly, the 'prev' and 'next' names will always iterate through the available groups instead. But at least the user could select their groups by iteration, rather than direct selection.
2022-04-07gdb: have reggroup_find return a constAndrew Burgess2-2/+3
Update reggroup_find to return a const reggroup *. There are other function in gdb/reggroup.{c,h} files that could benefit from returning const, these will be updated in later commits. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: use 'const reggroup *' in python/py-registers.c fileAndrew Burgess1-8/+8
Convert uses of 'struct reggroup *' in python/py-registers.c to be 'const'. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: switch to using 'const reggroup *' in tui-regs.{c,h}Andrew Burgess2-15/+16
Make uses of 'reggroup *' const throughout tui-regs.{c,h}. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: make gdbarch_register_reggroup_p take a const reggroup *Andrew Burgess29-33/+33
Change gdbarch_register_reggroup_p to take a 'const struct reggroup *' argument. This requires a change to the gdb/gdbarch-components.py script, regeneration of gdbarch.{c,h}, and then updates to all the architectures that implement this method. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: add some const in gdb/reggroups.cAndrew Burgess2-8/+8
This commit makes the 'struct reggroup *' argument const for the following functions: reggroup_next reggroup_prev reggroup_name reggroup_type There are other places that could benefit from const in the reggroup.{c,h} files, but these will be changing in further commits. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-07gdb: don't try to use readline before it's initializedAndrew Burgess1-2/+15
While working on a different patch, I triggered an assertion from the initialize_current_architecture code, specifically from one of the *_gdbarch_init functions in a *-tdep.c file. This exposes a couple of issues with GDB. This is easy enough to reproduce by adding 'gdb_assert (false)' into a suitable function. For example, I added a line into i386_gdbarch_init and can see the following issue. I start GDB and immediately hit the assert, the output is as you'd expect, except for the very last line: $ ./gdb/gdb --data-directory ./gdb/data-directory/ ../../src.dev-1/gdb/i386-tdep.c:8455: internal-error: i386_gdbarch_init: Assertion `false' failed. A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable. ----- Backtrace ----- ... snip ... --------------------- ../../src.dev-1/gdb/i386-tdep.c:8455: internal-error: i386_gdbarch_init: Assertion `false' failed. A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable. Quit this debugging session? (y or n) ../../src.dev-1/gdb/ser-event.c:212:16: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct serial' Something goes wrong when we try to query the user. Note, I configured GDB with --enable-ubsan, I suspect that without this the above "error" would actually just be a crash. The backtrace from ser-event.c:212 looks like this: (gdb) bt 10 #0 serial_event_clear (event=0x675c020) at ../../src/gdb/ser-event.c:212 #1 0x0000000000769456 in invoke_async_signal_handlers () at ../../src/gdb/async-event.c:211 #2 0x000000000295049b in gdb_do_one_event () at ../../src/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:194 #3 0x0000000001f015f8 in gdb_readline_wrapper ( prompt=0x67135c0 "../../src/gdb/i386-tdep.c:8455: internal-error: i386_gdbarch_init: Assertion `false' failed.\nA problem internal to GDB has been detected,\nfurther debugging may prove unreliable.\nQuit this debugg"...) at ../../src/gdb/top.c:1141 #4 0x0000000002118b64 in defaulted_query(const char *, char, typedef __va_list_tag __va_list_tag *) ( ctlstr=0x2e4eb68 "%s\nQuit this debugging session? ", defchar=0 '\000', args=0x7fffffffa6e0) at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:934 #5 0x0000000002118f72 in query (ctlstr=0x2e4eb68 "%s\nQuit this debugging session? ") at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:1026 #6 0x00000000021170f6 in internal_vproblem(internal_problem *, const char *, int, const char *, typedef __va_list_tag __va_list_tag *) (problem=0x6107bc0 <internal_error_problem>, file=0x2b976c8 "../../src/gdb/i386-tdep.c", line=8455, fmt=0x2b96d7f "%s: Assertion `%s' failed.", ap=0x7fffffffa8e8) at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:417 #7 0x00000000021175a0 in internal_verror (file=0x2b976c8 "../../src/gdb/i386-tdep.c", line=8455, fmt=0x2b96d7f "%s: Assertion `%s' failed.", ap=0x7fffffffa8e8) at ../../src/gdb/utils.c:485 #8 0x00000000029503b3 in internal_error (file=0x2b976c8 "../../src/gdb/i386-tdep.c", line=8455, fmt=0x2b96d7f "%s: Assertion `%s' failed.") at ../../src/gdbsupport/errors.cc:55 #9 0x000000000122d5b6 in i386_gdbarch_init (info=..., arches=0x0) at ../../src/gdb/i386-tdep.c:8455 (More stack frames follow...) It turns out that the problem is that the async event handler mechanism has been invoked, but this has not yet been initialized. If we look at gdb_init (in gdb/top.c) we can indeed see the call to gdb_init_signals is after the call to initialize_current_architecture. If I reorder the calls, moving gdb_init_signals earlier, then the initial error is resolved, however, things are still broken. I now see the same "Quit this debugging session? (y or n)" prompt, but when I provide an answer and press return GDB immediately crashes. So what's going on now? The next problem is that the call_readline field within the current_ui structure is not initialized, and this callback is invoked to process the reply I entered. The problem is that call_readline is setup as a result of calling set_top_level_interpreter, which is called from captured_main_1. Unfortunately, set_top_level_interpreter is called after gdb_init is called. I wondered how to solve this problem for a while, however, I don't know if there's an easy "just reorder some lines" solution here. Looking through captured_main_1 there seems to be a bunch of dependencies between printing various things, parsing config files, and setting up the interpreter. I'm sure there is a solution hiding in there somewhere.... I'm just not sure I want to spend any longer looking for it. So. I propose a simpler solution, more of a hack/work-around. In utils.c we already have a function filtered_printing_initialized, this is checked in a few places within internal_vproblem. In some of these cases the call gates whether or not GDB will query the user. My proposal is to add a new readline_initialized function, which checks if the current_ui has had readline initialized yet. If this is not the case then we should not attempt to query the user. After this change GDB prints the error message, the backtrace, and then aborts (including dumping core). This actually seems pretty sane as, if GDB has not yet made it through the initialization then it doesn't make much sense to allow the user to say "no, I don't want to quit the debug session" (I think).