1 files changed, 123 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sim/ppc/BUGS b/sim/ppc/BUGS
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..362b079
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sim/ppc/BUGS
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+ChangeLog
+
+See the ChangeLog file looking for lines taged with the word FIXME.
+
+
+COREFILE.C:
+
+The implementation of corefile.c (defined by corefile.h) isn't the
+best.  It is intended to be functionaly correct rather than fast.  One
+option being considered is to add a data cache to reduce the overhead
+of the most common case of data read/writes.
+
+
+VEA:
+
+Missing VEA system calls.
+
+ppc-instructions:
+
+Missing or commented out instructions.
+
+
+64bit:
+
+64bit target untested. 64bit host broken.  For instance use of scanf
+"%x", &long long.
+
+
+
+hw_*.c:
+
+Better and more devices.
+
+PORTABILITY:
+
+(Notes taken from Michael Meissner): Heavy use of the ## operator -
+fix using the clasic X/**/Y hack; Use of the signed keyword.  In
+particular, signed char has no analogue in classic C (though most
+implementations of classic C use signed chars); Use of long long which
+restricts the target compiler to be GCC.
+
+
+TRACING:
+
+debug.c: Macro's should be extended to include:
+
+	IS_*TRACE:	True if tracing enabled
+	*TRACE_PREFIX:	Outputs just the prefix line
+
+hw_trace.c: Flush, replace with a psim_set_tracing or some
+	such program.
+
+
+CIA/NIA:
+
+Replace with functions to return/increment the CIA?
+
+
+
+SMP & GDB:
+
+GDB doesn't understand SMP!
+
+
+
+
+OVERALL STRUCTURE:
+
+A new file pstruct.h is to be created that contains a single flat data
+structure containing:
+
+		pstruct {
+			events;
+			core;
+			processor[nr_cpus];
+			monitor;
+			devices;
+			trace;
+		}
+
+The CPU's structure, in turn would contain the VM sub structures.
+
+When SMP==0, everything would have PSTRUCT passed.  In SMP mode,
+however, there are two choices: PSTRUCT + CPU_NR or PROCESSOR.  I
+suspect the latter is better.
+
+It is believed that this would significantly improve performance (at
+the price of reduced control over object scope).
+
+
+
+
+IGEN:
+
+Igen at present can't do the following:
+
+	o	duplication is an all or nothing afair.
+
+		It should be configurable according to
+		the instruction or the sub-table.
+
+
+	o	Due to the naming, only a single generated
+		simulator can be included in a program.
+
+		IGEN should be able to generate multiple
+		engines that can all be included in a program
+
+	o	handle alternate architectures.
+
+
+	o	Igen should support the generation of a
+		disasembler and posibly an assembler.
+
+		I suggest that the table be extended to
+		include, for each instruction, additional
+		lines describing the extual format of the
+		instruction.
+
+		One possible format is:
+
+			"mtlr %RS":SPR.something
+			"mtspr %SPR, %RS"