aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb')
-rw-r--r--gdb/ChangeLog7
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog8
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-inheritance-syntax-error.cc29
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-inheritance-syntax-error.exp73
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-cp.cc6
-rw-r--r--gdb/varobj.c10
6 files changed, 128 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index aad31ec..3a5b491 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2011-08-26 Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
+
+ PR mi/11912
+ * varobj.c (cplus_describe_child): Add the keyword
+ 'class' to the output of the method when dealing
+ with a cast to a base class.
+
2011-08-26 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
No functionality change.
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index bb152a8..82496a0 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2011-08-26 Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
+
+ PR mi/11912
+ * gdb.mi/mi-inheritance-syntax-error.cc: New file.
+ * gdb.mi/mi-inheritance-syntax-error.exp: New file.
+ * gdb.mi/mi-var-cp.cc: Updated for new 'class'
+ keyword in output of -var-info-path-expression.
+
2011-08-26 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* gdb.trace/backtrace.exp: Use is_lp64_target to check 64bit target.
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-inheritance-syntax-error.cc b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-inheritance-syntax-error.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9cc0518
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-inheritance-syntax-error.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// Test for -var-info-path-expression syntax error
+// caused by PR 11912
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+class A
+{
+ int a;
+};
+
+class C : public A
+{
+ public:
+ C()
+ {
+ };
+ void testLocation()
+ {
+ z = 1;
+ };
+ int z;
+};
+
+int main()
+{
+ C c;
+ c.testLocation();
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-inheritance-syntax-error.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-inheritance-syntax-error.exp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e24019b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-inheritance-syntax-error.exp
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+# Copyright 2011
+# Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
+
+load_lib mi-support.exp
+set MIFLAGS "-i=mi"
+
+gdb_exit
+if [mi_gdb_start] {
+ continue
+}
+
+set testfile mi-inheritance-syntax-error
+set srcfile "$testfile.cc"
+set binfile $objdir/$subdir/$testfile
+
+if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
+ return -1;
+}
+
+if {[gdb_compile $srcdir/$subdir/$srcfile $binfile executable {debug c++}] != ""} {
+ untested mi-inheritance-syntax-error.exp
+ return -1
+}
+
+# Test that children of derived classes are given the proper
+# path by -var-info-path-expression
+
+mi_gdb_load ${binfile}
+mi_runto C::testLocation
+
+mi_create_varobj "var1" "this" "create var for THIS"
+
+mi_list_varobj_children "var1" {
+ {var1.A A 1 A}
+ {var1.public public 1}
+} "list children of THIS"
+
+# We don't care what the result of -var-info-path-expression
+# as long as it can be used in the -data-evaluate-expression
+# that follows
+mi_gdb_test "-var-info-path-expression var1.A" \
+ "\\^done,path_expr=\".*\"" \
+ "-var-info-path-expression var1.A"
+
+# Extract the result of the -var-info-path-expression command
+# to use it in -data-evaluate-expression
+set cmd_output $expect_out(2,string)
+set path [lindex [split $cmd_output "\""] 1]
+verbose "var-info-path-expression returned $cmd_output" 2
+verbose "Using $path for data-evaluate-expression" 2
+
+
+mi_gdb_test "-data-evaluate-expression \"$path\"" \
+ "\\^done,value=\"\{a = \[0-9\]*\}\"" \
+ "-data-evaluate-expression $path"
+
+mi_gdb_exit
+return 0
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-cp.cc b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-cp.cc
index 0a55255..54439e6 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-cp.cc
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-cp.cc
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ int path_expression ()
{DP.Base2 Base2 1 Base2} \
{DP.public public 1}} "list children of DP"
mi_gdb_test "-var-info-path-expression DP.Base1" \
- "\\^done,path_expr=\"\\(\\*\\(Base1\\*\\) dp\\)\"" \
+ "\\^done,path_expr=\"\\(\\*\\(class Base1\\*\\) dp\\)\"" \
"-var-info-path-expression DP.Base1"
mi_list_varobj_children DP.public { \
{DP.public.i i 0 int} \
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ int path_expression ()
{DP.Base1.public.i i 0 int} \
} "list children of DP.Base1.public"
mi_gdb_test "-var-info-path-expression DP.Base1.public.i" \
- "\\^done,path_expr=\"\\(\\(\\(\\*\\(Base1\\*\\) dp\\)\\).i\\)\"" \
+ "\\^done,path_expr=\"\\(\\(\\(\\*\\(class Base1\\*\\) dp\\)\\).i\\)\"" \
"-var-info-path-expression DP.Base1.public.i"
mi_gdb_test "-var-info-path-expression DP.public" \
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ int path_expression ()
{D.Base2 Base2 1 Base2} \
{D.public public 1}} "list children of D"
mi_gdb_test "-var-info-path-expression D.Base1" \
- "\\^done,path_expr=\"\\(\\(Base1\\) d\\)\"" \
+ "\\^done,path_expr=\"\\(\\(class Base1\\) d\\)\"" \
"-var-info-path-expression D.Base1"
:*/
int array[4] = {1,2,3};
diff --git a/gdb/varobj.c b/gdb/varobj.c
index eadd62b..7c68a93 100644
--- a/gdb/varobj.c
+++ b/gdb/varobj.c
@@ -3443,8 +3443,14 @@ cplus_describe_child (struct varobj *parent, int index,
will create an lvalue, for all appearences, so we don't
need to use more fancy:
*(Base1*)(&d)
- construct. */
- *cfull_expression = xstrprintf ("(%s(%s%s) %s)",
+ construct.
+
+ When we are in the scope of the base class or of one
+ of its children, the type field name will be interpreted
+ as a constructor, if it exists. Therefore, we must
+ indicate that the name is a class name by using the
+ 'class' keyword. See PR mi/11912 */
+ *cfull_expression = xstrprintf ("(%s(class %s%s) %s)",
ptr,
TYPE_FIELD_NAME (type, index),
ptr,