aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/valops.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/valops.c')
-rw-r--r--gdb/valops.c58
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/valops.c b/gdb/valops.c
index ff24a9f..a7453e9 100644
--- a/gdb/valops.c
+++ b/gdb/valops.c
@@ -1079,8 +1079,8 @@ value_push (register CORE_ADDR sp, struct value *arg)
}
CORE_ADDR
-default_push_arguments (int nargs, struct value **args, CORE_ADDR sp,
- int struct_return, CORE_ADDR struct_addr)
+legacy_push_arguments (int nargs, struct value **args, CORE_ADDR sp,
+ int struct_return, CORE_ADDR struct_addr)
{
/* ASSERT ( !struct_return); */
int i;
@@ -1264,6 +1264,7 @@ hand_function_call (struct value *function, int nargs, struct value **args)
static ULONGEST *dummy;
int sizeof_dummy1;
char *dummy1;
+ CORE_ADDR dummy_addr;
CORE_ADDR old_sp;
struct type *value_type;
unsigned char struct_return;
@@ -1428,21 +1429,25 @@ hand_function_call (struct value *function, int nargs, struct value **args)
real_pc = start_sp;
#endif
- if (CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION == ON_STACK)
+ switch (CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION)
{
+ case ON_STACK:
+ dummy_addr = start_sp;
write_memory (start_sp, (char *) dummy1, sizeof_dummy1);
if (DEPRECATED_USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES)
generic_save_call_dummy_addr (start_sp, start_sp + sizeof_dummy1);
- }
-
- if (CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION == AT_ENTRY_POINT)
- {
+ break;
+ case AT_ENTRY_POINT:
real_pc = funaddr;
+ dummy_addr = CALL_DUMMY_ADDRESS ();
if (DEPRECATED_USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES)
/* NOTE: cagney/2002-04-13: The entry point is going to be
modified with a single breakpoint. */
generic_save_call_dummy_addr (CALL_DUMMY_ADDRESS (),
CALL_DUMMY_ADDRESS () + 1);
+ break;
+ default:
+ internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, "bad switch");
}
#ifdef lint
@@ -1569,9 +1574,8 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
{
int len = TYPE_LENGTH (value_type);
if (STACK_ALIGN_P ())
- /* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this stack_align
- code is really broken. Better to let PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust
- the stack in a target-defined manner. */
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-03-22: Should rely on frame align, rather
+ than stack align to force the alignment of the stack. */
len = STACK_ALIGN (len);
if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
@@ -1605,7 +1609,7 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
if (DEPRECATED_EXTRA_STACK_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED)
{
/* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this stack_align code
- is really broken. Better to let PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust the
+ is really broken. Better to let push_dummy_call() adjust the
stack in a target-defined manner. */
if (STACK_ALIGN_P () && INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
@@ -1620,7 +1624,22 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
}
}
- sp = PUSH_ARGUMENTS (nargs, args, sp, struct_return, struct_addr);
+ /* Create the dummy stack frame. Pass in the call dummy address as,
+ presumably, the ABI code knows where, in the call dummy, the
+ return address should be pointed. */
+ if (gdbarch_push_dummy_call_p (current_gdbarch))
+ /* When there is no push_dummy_call method, should this code
+ simply error out. That would the implementation of this method
+ for all ABIs (which is probably a good thing). */
+ sp = gdbarch_push_dummy_call (current_gdbarch, current_regcache,
+ dummy_addr, nargs, args, sp, struct_return,
+ struct_addr);
+ else if (DEPRECATED_PUSH_ARGUMENTS_P ())
+ /* Keep old targets working. */
+ sp = DEPRECATED_PUSH_ARGUMENTS (nargs, args, sp, struct_return,
+ struct_addr);
+ else
+ sp = legacy_push_arguments (nargs, args, sp, struct_return, struct_addr);
if (PUSH_RETURN_ADDRESS_P ())
/* for targets that use no CALL_DUMMY */
@@ -1635,7 +1654,12 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
functionality a bit, so I'm making it explicit to do it here. */
sp = PUSH_RETURN_ADDRESS (real_pc, sp);
- if (STACK_ALIGN_P () && !INNER_THAN (1, 2))
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-03-23: Diable this code when there is a
+ push_dummy_call() method. Since that method will have already
+ handled any alignment issues, the code below is entirely
+ redundant. */
+ if (!gdbarch_push_dummy_call_p (current_gdbarch)
+ && STACK_ALIGN_P () && !INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* If stack grows up, we must leave a hole at the bottom, note
that sp already has been advanced for the arguments! */
@@ -1667,7 +1691,13 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
might fool with it. On SPARC, this write also stores the register
window into the right place in the new stack frame, which otherwise
wouldn't happen. (See store_inferior_registers in sparc-nat.c.) */
- write_sp (sp);
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-03-23: Disable this code when there is a
+ push_dummy_call() method. Since that method will have already
+ stored the stack pointer (as part of creating the fake call
+ frame), and none of the code following that code adjusts the
+ stack-pointer value, the below call is entirely redundant. */
+ if (!gdbarch_push_dummy_call_p (current_gdbarch))
+ write_sp (sp);
if (SAVE_DUMMY_FRAME_TOS_P ())
SAVE_DUMMY_FRAME_TOS (sp);