aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/stack.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/stack.c')
-rw-r--r--gdb/stack.c57
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c
index 82820aa..28ff09d 100644
--- a/gdb/stack.c
+++ b/gdb/stack.c
@@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ print_block_frame_labels (struct block *b, int *have_default,
ALL_BLOCK_SYMBOLS (b, iter, sym)
{
- if (STREQ (DEPRECATED_SYMBOL_NAME (sym), "default"))
+ if (DEPRECATED_STREQ (DEPRECATED_SYMBOL_NAME (sym), "default"))
{
if (*have_default)
continue;
@@ -1854,33 +1854,33 @@ return_command (char *retval_exp, int from_tty)
if (VALUE_LAZY (return_value))
value_fetch_lazy (return_value);
- /* Check that this architecture can handle the function's return
- type. In the case of "struct convention", still do the
- "return", just also warn the user. */
- if (gdbarch_return_value_p (current_gdbarch))
+ if (TYPE_CODE (return_type) == TYPE_CODE_VOID)
+ /* If the return-type is "void", don't try to find the
+ return-value's location. However, do still evaluate the
+ return expression so that, even when the expression result
+ is discarded, side effects such as "return i++" still
+ occure. */
+ return_value = NULL;
+ else if (!gdbarch_return_value_p (current_gdbarch)
+ && (TYPE_CODE (return_type) == TYPE_CODE_STRUCT
+ || TYPE_CODE (return_type) == TYPE_CODE_UNION))
{
- if (gdbarch_return_value (current_gdbarch, return_type,
- NULL, NULL, NULL)
- == RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION)
- return_value = NULL;
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-10-20: Compatibility hack for legacy
+ code. Old architectures don't expect STORE_RETURN_VALUE
+ to be called with with a small struct that needs to be
+ stored in registers. Don't start doing it now. */
+ query_prefix = "\
+A structure or union return type is not supported by this architecture.\n\
+If you continue, the return value that you specified will be ignored.\n";
+ return_value = NULL;
}
- else
+ else if (using_struct_return (return_type, 0))
{
- /* NOTE: cagney/2003-10-20: The double check is to ensure
- that the STORE_RETURN_VALUE call, further down, is not
- applied to a struct or union return-value. It wasn't
- allowed previously, so don't start allowing it now. An
- ABI that uses "register convention" to return small
- structures and should implement the "return_value"
- architecture method. */
- if (using_struct_return (return_type, 0)
- || TYPE_CODE (return_type) == TYPE_CODE_STRUCT
- || TYPE_CODE (return_type) == TYPE_CODE_UNION)
- return_value = NULL;
+ query_prefix = "\
+The location at which to store the function's return value is unknown.\n\
+If you continue, the return value that you specified will be ignored.\n";
+ return_value = NULL;
}
- if (return_value == NULL)
- query_prefix = "\
-The location at which to store the function's return value is unknown.\n";
}
/* Does an interactive user really want to do this? Include
@@ -2036,7 +2036,14 @@ get_frame_language (void)
if (deprecated_selected_frame)
{
- s = find_pc_symtab (get_frame_pc (deprecated_selected_frame));
+ /* We determine the current frame language by looking up its
+ associated symtab. To retrieve this symtab, we use the frame PC.
+ However we cannot use the frame pc as is, because it usually points
+ to the instruction following the "call", which is sometimes the first
+ instruction of another function. So we rely on
+ get_frame_address_in_block(), it provides us with a PC which is
+ guaranteed to be inside the frame's code block. */
+ s = find_pc_symtab (get_frame_address_in_block (deprecated_selected_frame));
if (s)
flang = s->language;
else