diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/infrun.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/infrun.c | 125 |
1 files changed, 81 insertions, 44 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c index 31bb132..ab39b6e 100644 --- a/gdb/infrun.c +++ b/gdb/infrun.c @@ -85,9 +85,6 @@ static void set_schedlock_func (char *args, int from_tty, static int currently_stepping (struct thread_info *tp); -static int currently_stepping_or_nexting_callback (struct thread_info *tp, - void *data); - static void xdb_handle_command (char *args, int from_tty); static void print_exited_reason (int exitstatus); @@ -2107,6 +2104,17 @@ thread_still_needs_step_over (struct thread_info *tp) return 0; } +/* Returns true if scheduler locking applies. STEP indicates whether + we're about to do a step/next-like command to a thread. */ + +static int +schedlock_applies (int step) +{ + return (scheduler_mode == schedlock_on + || (scheduler_mode == schedlock_step + && step)); +} + /* Look a thread other than EXCEPT that has previously reported a breakpoint event, and thus needs a step-over in order to make progress. Returns NULL is none is found. STEP indicates whether @@ -2116,21 +2124,16 @@ thread_still_needs_step_over (struct thread_info *tp) static struct thread_info * find_thread_needs_step_over (int step, struct thread_info *except) { - int schedlock_enabled; struct thread_info *tp, *current; /* With non-stop mode on, threads are always handled individually. */ gdb_assert (! non_stop); - schedlock_enabled = (scheduler_mode == schedlock_on - || (scheduler_mode == schedlock_step - && step)); - current = inferior_thread (); /* If scheduler locking applies, we can avoid iterating over all threads. */ - if (schedlock_enabled) + if (schedlock_applies (step)) { if (except != current && thread_still_needs_step_over (current)) @@ -5137,6 +5140,7 @@ switch_back_to_stepped_thread (struct execution_control_state *ecs) { struct thread_info *tp; struct thread_info *stepping_thread; + struct thread_info *step_over; /* If any thread is blocked on some internal breakpoint, and we simply need to step over that breakpoint to get it going @@ -5179,17 +5183,72 @@ switch_back_to_stepped_thread (struct execution_control_state *ecs) return 1; } - stepping_thread - = iterate_over_threads (currently_stepping_or_nexting_callback, - ecs->event_thread); + /* Otherwise, we no longer expect a trap in the current thread. + Clear the trap_expected flag before switching back -- this is + what keep_going does as well, if we call it. */ + ecs->event_thread->control.trap_expected = 0; + + /* If scheduler locking applies even if not stepping, there's no + need to walk over threads. Above we've checked whether the + current thread is stepping. If some other thread not the + event thread is stepping, then it must be that scheduler + locking is not in effect. */ + if (schedlock_applies (0)) + return 0; + + /* Look for the stepping/nexting thread, and check if any other + thread other than the stepping thread needs to start a + step-over. Do all step-overs before actually proceeding with + step/next/etc. */ + stepping_thread = NULL; + step_over = NULL; + ALL_THREADS (tp) + { + /* Ignore threads of processes we're not resuming. */ + if (!sched_multi + && ptid_get_pid (tp->ptid) != ptid_get_pid (inferior_ptid)) + continue; + + /* When stepping over a breakpoint, we lock all threads + except the one that needs to move past the breakpoint. + If a non-event thread has this set, the "incomplete + step-over" check above should have caught it earlier. */ + gdb_assert (!tp->control.trap_expected); + + /* Did we find the stepping thread? */ + if (tp->control.step_range_end) + { + /* Yep. There should only one though. */ + gdb_assert (stepping_thread == NULL); + + /* The event thread is handled at the top, before we + enter this loop. */ + gdb_assert (tp != ecs->event_thread); + + /* If some thread other than the event thread is + stepping, then scheduler locking can't be in effect, + otherwise we wouldn't have resumed the current event + thread in the first place. */ + gdb_assert (!schedlock_applies (1)); + + stepping_thread = tp; + } + else if (thread_still_needs_step_over (tp)) + { + step_over = tp; + + /* At the top we've returned early if the event thread + is stepping. If some other thread not the event + thread is stepping, then scheduler locking can't be + in effect, and we can resume this thread. No need to + keep looking for the stepping thread then. */ + break; + } + } - /* Check if any other thread except the stepping thread that - needs to start a step-over. Do that before actually - proceeding with step/next/etc. */ - tp = find_thread_needs_step_over (stepping_thread != NULL, - stepping_thread); - if (tp != NULL) + if (step_over != NULL) { + tp = step_over; if (debug_infrun) { fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, @@ -5197,14 +5256,9 @@ switch_back_to_stepped_thread (struct execution_control_state *ecs) target_pid_to_str (tp->ptid)); } - gdb_assert (!tp->control.trap_expected); + /* Only the stepping thread should have this set. */ gdb_assert (tp->control.step_range_end == 0); - /* We no longer expect a trap in the current thread. Clear - the trap_expected flag before switching. This is what - keep_going would do as well, if we called it. */ - ecs->event_thread->control.trap_expected = 0; - ecs->ptid = tp->ptid; ecs->event_thread = tp; switch_to_thread (ecs->ptid); @@ -5212,12 +5266,13 @@ switch_back_to_stepped_thread (struct execution_control_state *ecs) return 1; } - tp = stepping_thread; - if (tp != NULL) + if (stepping_thread != NULL) { struct frame_info *frame; struct gdbarch *gdbarch; + tp = stepping_thread; + /* If the stepping thread exited, then don't try to switch back and resume it, which could fail in several different ways depending on the target. Instead, just keep going. @@ -5250,11 +5305,6 @@ switch_back_to_stepped_thread (struct execution_control_state *ecs) return 1; } - /* Otherwise, we no longer expect a trap in the current thread. - Clear the trap_expected flag before switching back -- this is - what keep_going would do as well, if we called it. */ - ecs->event_thread->control.trap_expected = 0; - if (debug_infrun) fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: switching back to stepped thread\n"); @@ -5325,19 +5375,6 @@ currently_stepping (struct thread_info *tp) || bpstat_should_step ()); } -/* Returns true if any thread *but* the one passed in "data" is in the - middle of stepping or of handling a "next". */ - -static int -currently_stepping_or_nexting_callback (struct thread_info *tp, void *data) -{ - if (tp == data) - return 0; - - return (tp->control.step_range_end - || tp->control.trap_expected); -} - /* Inferior has stepped into a subroutine call with source code that we should not step over. Do step to the first line of code in it. */ |