aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/infrun.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/infrun.c')
-rw-r--r--gdb/infrun.c43
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 40 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index 7cb9f33..b96e1c7 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -534,16 +534,6 @@ static void
follow_vfork (int parent_pid, int child_pid)
{
follow_inferior_fork (parent_pid, child_pid, 0, 1);
-
- /* Did we follow the child? Had it exec'd before we saw the parent vfork? */
- if (pending_follow.fork_event.saw_child_exec
- && (PIDGET (inferior_ptid) == child_pid))
- {
- pending_follow.fork_event.saw_child_exec = 0;
- pending_follow.kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_SPURIOUS;
- follow_exec (PIDGET (inferior_ptid), pending_follow.execd_pathname);
- xfree (pending_follow.execd_pathname);
- }
}
/* EXECD_PATHNAME is assumed to be non-NULL. */
@@ -1555,6 +1545,9 @@ handle_inferior_event (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
case TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD:
stop_signal = TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP;
+ /* NOTE drow/2002-12-05: This code should be pushed down into the
+ target_wait function. Until then following vfork on HP/UX 10.20
+ is probably broken by this. Of course, it's broken anyway. */
/* Is this a target which reports multiple exec events per actual
call to exec()? (HP-UX using ptrace does, for example.) If so,
ignore all but the last one. Just resume the exec'r, and wait
@@ -1576,36 +1569,6 @@ handle_inferior_event (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
savestring (ecs->ws.value.execd_pathname,
strlen (ecs->ws.value.execd_pathname));
- /* Did inferior_ptid exec, or did a (possibly not-yet-followed)
- child of a vfork exec?
-
- ??rehrauer: This is unabashedly an HP-UX specific thing. On
- HP-UX, events associated with a vforking inferior come in
- threes: a vfork event for the child (always first), followed
- a vfork event for the parent and an exec event for the child.
- The latter two can come in either order.
-
- If we get the parent vfork event first, life's good: We follow
- either the parent or child, and then the child's exec event is
- a "don't care".
-
- But if we get the child's exec event first, then we delay
- responding to it until we handle the parent's vfork. Because,
- otherwise we can't satisfy a "catch vfork". */
- if (pending_follow.kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORKED)
- {
- pending_follow.fork_event.saw_child_exec = 1;
-
- /* On some targets, the child must be resumed before
- the parent vfork event is delivered. A single-step
- suffices. */
- if (RESUME_EXECD_VFORKING_CHILD_TO_GET_PARENT_VFORK ())
- target_resume (ecs->ptid, 1, TARGET_SIGNAL_0);
- /* We expect the parent vfork event to be available now. */
- prepare_to_wait (ecs);
- return;
- }
-
/* This causes the eventpoints and symbol table to be reset. Must
do this now, before trying to determine whether to stop. */
follow_exec (PIDGET (inferior_ptid), pending_follow.execd_pathname);