diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/cp-namespace.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | gdb/cp-namespace.c | 45 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/cp-namespace.c b/gdb/cp-namespace.c index 226dab5..e48e9c3 100644 --- a/gdb/cp-namespace.c +++ b/gdb/cp-namespace.c @@ -520,6 +520,51 @@ lookup_symbol_file (const char *name, return NULL; } +/* Look up a type named NESTED_NAME that is nested inside the C++ + class or namespace given by PARENT_TYPE, from within the context + given by BLOCK. */ + +struct type * +cp_lookup_nested_type (struct type *parent_type, + const char *nested_name, + const struct block *block) +{ + switch (TYPE_CODE (parent_type)) + { + case TYPE_CODE_STRUCT: + case TYPE_CODE_NAMESPACE: + { + /* NOTE: carlton/2002-12-17: As of this writing, C++ class + members of classes aren't treated like, say, data or + function members. Instead, they're just represented by + symbols whose names are qualified by the name of the + surrounding class. This is just like members of + namespaces; in particular, lookup_symbol_namespace works + when looking them up. */ + + /* NOTE: carlton/2002-12-17: The above is, actually, lying: + there are still situations where nested types are + represented by symbols that include only the member name, + not the parent name. Sigh. Blame it on stabs, or + something. */ + const char *parent_name = TYPE_TAG_NAME (parent_type); + struct symbol *sym = cp_lookup_symbol_namespace (parent_name, + nested_name, + NULL, + block, + VAR_DOMAIN, + NULL); + if (sym == NULL || SYMBOL_CLASS (sym) != LOC_TYPEDEF) + return NULL; + else + return SYMBOL_TYPE (sym); + } + default: + error ("\"%s\" is not defined as a compound type.", + TYPE_NAME (parent_type)); + } +} + /* Try to look up the type definition associated to NAME if honest methods don't work: look for NAME in the classes/namespaces that are currently active, on the off chance that it might be there. */ |