diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/c-exp.y')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/c-exp.y | 179 |
1 files changed, 90 insertions, 89 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/c-exp.y b/gdb/c-exp.y index 34f7729..0c279db 100644 --- a/gdb/c-exp.y +++ b/gdb/c-exp.y @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */ #include "objfiles.h" /* For have_full_symbols and have_partial_symbols */ #include "charset.h" #include "block.h" +#include "cp-support.h" /* Flag indicating we're dealing with HP-compiled objects */ extern int hp_som_som_object_present; @@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ static int parse_number (char *, int, int, YYSTYPE *); %type <voidval> exp exp1 type_exp start variable qualified_name lcurly %type <lval> rcurly -%type <tval> type typebase +%type <tval> type typebase qualified_type %type <tvec> nonempty_typelist /* %type <bval> block */ @@ -595,7 +596,8 @@ qualified_name: typebase COLONCOLON name { struct type *type = $1; if (TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_STRUCT - && TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_UNION) + && TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_UNION + && TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_NAMESPACE) error ("`%s' is not defined as an aggregate type.", TYPE_NAME (type)); @@ -609,7 +611,8 @@ qualified_name: typebase COLONCOLON name struct type *type = $1; struct stoken tmp_token; if (TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_STRUCT - && TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_UNION) + && TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_UNION + && TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_NAMESPACE) error ("`%s' is not defined as an aggregate type.", TYPE_NAME (type)); @@ -888,6 +891,80 @@ typebase /* Implements (approximately): (type-qualifier)* type-specifier */ { $$ = follow_types ($2); } | typebase const_or_volatile_or_space_identifier_noopt { $$ = follow_types ($1); } + | qualified_type + ; + +/* FIXME: carlton/2003-09-25: This next bit leads to lots of + reduce-reduce conflicts, because the parser doesn't know whether or + not to use qualified_name or qualified_type: the rules are + identical. If the parser is parsing 'A::B::x', then, when it sees + the second '::', it knows that the expression to the left of it has + to be a type, so it uses qualified_type. But if it is parsing just + 'A::B', then it doesn't have any way of knowing which rule to use, + so there's a reduce-reduce conflict; it picks qualified_name, since + that occurs earlier in this file than qualified_type. + + There's no good way to fix this with the grammar as it stands; as + far as I can tell, some of the problems arise from ambiguities that + GDB introduces ('start' can be either an expression or a type), but + some of it is inherent to the nature of C++ (you want to treat the + input "(FOO)" fairly differently depending on whether FOO is an + expression or a type, and if FOO is a complex expression, this can + be hard to determine at the right time). Fortunately, it works + pretty well in most cases. For example, if you do 'ptype A::B', + where A::B is a nested type, then the parser will mistakenly + misidentify it as an expression; but evaluate_subexp will get + called with 'noside' set to EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS, and everything + will work out anyways. But there are situations where the parser + will get confused: the most common one that I've run into is when + you want to do + + print *((A::B *) x)" + + where the parser doesn't realize that A::B has to be a type until + it hits the first right paren, at which point it's too late. (The + workaround is to type "print *(('A::B' *) x)" instead.) (And + another solution is to fix our symbol-handling code so that the + user never wants to type something like that in the first place, + because we get all the types right without the user's help!) + + Perhaps we could fix this by making the lexer smarter. Some of + this functionality used to be in the lexer, but in a way that + worked even less well than the current solution: that attempt + involved having the parser sometimes handle '::' and having the + lexer sometimes handle it, and without a clear division of + responsibility, it quickly degenerated into a big mess. Probably + the eventual correct solution will give more of a role to the lexer + (ideally via code that is shared between the lexer and + decode_line_1), but I'm not holding my breath waiting for somebody + to get around to cleaning this up... */ + +/* FIXME: carlton/2003-09-25: Currently, the only qualified type + symbols that we generate are nested namespaces. Next on my TODO + list is to generate all nested type names properly (or at least as + well as possible, assuming that we're using DWARF-2). */ + +qualified_type: typebase COLONCOLON name + { + struct type *type = $1; + struct type *new_type; + char *ncopy = alloca ($3.length + 1); + + memcpy (ncopy, $3.ptr, $3.length); + ncopy[$3.length] = '\0'; + + if (TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_NAMESPACE) + error ("`%s' is not defined as a namespace.", + TYPE_NAME (type)); + + new_type = cp_lookup_nested_type (type, ncopy, + expression_context_block); + if (new_type == NULL) + error ("No type \"%s\" in namespace \"%s\".", + ncopy, TYPE_NAME (type)); + + $$ = new_type; + } ; typename: TYPENAME @@ -1633,7 +1710,13 @@ yylex () string to get a reasonable class/namespace spec or a fully-qualified name. This is a kludge to get around the HP aCC compiler's generation of symbol names with embedded - colons for namespace and nested classes. */ + colons for namespace and nested classes. */ + + /* NOTE: carlton/2003-09-24: I don't entirely understand the + HP-specific code, either here or in linespec. Having said that, + I suspect that we're actually moving towards their model: we want + symbols whose names are fully qualified, which matches the + description above. */ if (unquoted_expr) { /* Only do it if not inside single quotes */ @@ -1687,92 +1770,10 @@ yylex () if (sym && SYMBOL_CLASS (sym) == LOC_TYPEDEF) { -#if 1 - /* Despite the following flaw, we need to keep this code enabled. - Because we can get called from check_stub_method, if we don't - handle nested types then it screws many operations in any - program which uses nested types. */ - /* In "A::x", if x is a member function of A and there happens - to be a type (nested or not, since the stabs don't make that - distinction) named x, then this code incorrectly thinks we - are dealing with nested types rather than a member function. */ - - char *p; - char *namestart; - struct symbol *best_sym; - - /* Look ahead to detect nested types. This probably should be - done in the grammar, but trying seemed to introduce a lot - of shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts. It's possible - that it could be done, though. Or perhaps a non-grammar, but - less ad hoc, approach would work well. */ - - /* Since we do not currently have any way of distinguishing - a nested type from a non-nested one (the stabs don't tell - us whether a type is nested), we just ignore the - containing type. */ - - p = lexptr; - best_sym = sym; - while (1) - { - /* Skip whitespace. */ - while (*p == ' ' || *p == '\t' || *p == '\n') - ++p; - if (*p == ':' && p[1] == ':') - { - /* Skip the `::'. */ - p += 2; - /* Skip whitespace. */ - while (*p == ' ' || *p == '\t' || *p == '\n') - ++p; - namestart = p; - while (*p == '_' || *p == '$' || (*p >= '0' && *p <= '9') - || (*p >= 'a' && *p <= 'z') - || (*p >= 'A' && *p <= 'Z')) - ++p; - if (p != namestart) - { - struct symbol *cur_sym; - /* As big as the whole rest of the expression, which is - at least big enough. */ - char *ncopy = alloca (strlen (tmp)+strlen (namestart)+3); - char *tmp1; - - tmp1 = ncopy; - memcpy (tmp1, tmp, strlen (tmp)); - tmp1 += strlen (tmp); - memcpy (tmp1, "::", 2); - tmp1 += 2; - memcpy (tmp1, namestart, p - namestart); - tmp1[p - namestart] = '\0'; - cur_sym = lookup_symbol (ncopy, expression_context_block, - VAR_DOMAIN, (int *) NULL, - (struct symtab **) NULL); - if (cur_sym) - { - if (SYMBOL_CLASS (cur_sym) == LOC_TYPEDEF) - { - best_sym = cur_sym; - lexptr = p; - } - else - break; - } - else - break; - } - else - break; - } - else - break; - } - - yylval.tsym.type = SYMBOL_TYPE (best_sym); -#else /* not 0 */ + /* NOTE: carlton/2003-09-25: There used to be code here to + handle nested types. It didn't work very well. See the + comment before qualified_type for more info. */ yylval.tsym.type = SYMBOL_TYPE (sym); -#endif /* not 0 */ return TYPENAME; } if ((yylval.tsym.type = lookup_primitive_typename (tmp)) != 0) |