aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--gdb/ChangeLog6
-rw-r--r--gdb/infrun.c40
2 files changed, 39 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index d9b296d..4b21d6e 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
2007-11-20 Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
+ * infrun.c (resume): Clarify logic that
+ decides if a single thread must be resumed. Add
+ comments.
+
+2007-11-20 Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
+
* breakpoint.c (disable_breakpoints_in_unloaded_shlib):
Make static.
diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index cf7aa02..85d889a 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -583,15 +583,41 @@ a command like `return' or `jump' to continue execution."));
resume_ptid = RESUME_ALL; /* Default */
- if ((step || singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p)
- && (stepping_past_singlestep_breakpoint
- || (!breakpoints_inserted && breakpoint_here_p (read_pc ()))))
+ /* If STEP is set, it's a request to use hardware stepping
+ facilities. But in that case, we should never
+ use singlestep breakpoint. */
+ gdb_assert (!(singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p && step));
+
+ if (singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p
+ && stepping_past_singlestep_breakpoint)
{
- /* Stepping past a breakpoint without inserting breakpoints.
- Make sure only the current thread gets to step, so that
- other threads don't sneak past breakpoints while they are
- not inserted. */
+ /* The situation here is as follows. In thread T1 we wanted to
+ single-step. Lacking hardware single-stepping we've
+ set breakpoint at the PC of the next instruction -- call it
+ P. After resuming, we've hit that breakpoint in thread T2.
+ Now we've removed original breakpoint, inserted breakpoint
+ at P+1, and try to step to advance T2 past breakpoint.
+ We need to step only T2, as if T1 is allowed to freely run,
+ it can run past P, and if other threads are allowed to run,
+ they can hit breakpoint at P+1, and nested hits of single-step
+ breakpoints is not something we'd want -- that's complicated
+ to support, and has no value. */
+ resume_ptid = inferior_ptid;
+ }
+ if (step && breakpoint_here_p (read_pc ())
+ && !breakpoint_inserted_here_p (read_pc ()))
+ {
+ /* We're stepping, have breakpoint at PC, and it's
+ not inserted. Most likely, proceed has noticed that
+ we have breakpoint and tries to single-step over it,
+ so that it's not hit. In which case, we need to
+ single-step only this thread, and keep others stopped,
+ as they can miss this breakpoint if allowed to run.
+
+ The current code either has all breakpoints inserted,
+ or all removed, so if we let other threads run,
+ we can actually miss any breakpoint, not the one at PC. */
resume_ptid = inferior_ptid;
}