diff options
author | Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> | 2013-08-30 15:37:37 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> | 2013-08-30 15:37:37 +0000 |
commit | 02457c768f78754f76d81b241236338ee2e28a86 (patch) | |
tree | b3e327bfaafa6a149c5ad1999a315ec30f04fe67 /opcodes/z80-dis.c | |
parent | e0162910f16c309b8bc642cfb1558babe92993f7 (diff) | |
download | gdb-02457c768f78754f76d81b241236338ee2e28a86.zip gdb-02457c768f78754f76d81b241236338ee2e28a86.tar.gz gdb-02457c768f78754f76d81b241236338ee2e28a86.tar.bz2 |
MI -trace-find, print frame with LOC_AND_ADDRESS instead of SRC_AND_LOC.
When I looked for print_stack_frame calls in MI, I wondered why this
one passing down SRC_AND_LOC. print_stack_frame does:
/* For mi, alway print location and address. */
if (ui_out_is_mi_like_p (current_uiout))
print_what = LOC_AND_ADDRESS;
So it really doesn't matter which value is passed down, but, to avoid
confusion in readers, it's better to use the MI standard here.
There's another SRC_AND_LOC in mi-interp.c, but that one makes sense.
gdb/
2013-08-30 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* mi/mi-main.c (mi_cmd_trace_find): Use LOC_AND_ADDRESS instead of
SRC_AND_LOC.
Diffstat (limited to 'opcodes/z80-dis.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions