diff options
| author | Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> | 2020-10-14 13:17:58 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> | 2020-10-14 13:17:58 +0200 |
| commit | 8c8bd0babc6039a4cef7d60d57b1b68e7a7f2e70 (patch) | |
| tree | f197f37a8b4fe365e6034530e16fc58c46c97847 /opcodes/i386-gen.c | |
| parent | 76547ab31b16b521e29892cab5a29b60b52291a5 (diff) | |
| download | gdb-8c8bd0babc6039a4cef7d60d57b1b68e7a7f2e70.zip gdb-8c8bd0babc6039a4cef7d60d57b1b68e7a7f2e70.tar.gz gdb-8c8bd0babc6039a4cef7d60d57b1b68e7a7f2e70.tar.bz2 | |
[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.ada/mi_catch_ex{,_hand}.exp FAILs
The test-case gdb.ada/mi_catch_ex.exp tests two scenarios.
The two scenarios are separated by:
- a mi_run_to_main (before commit b75d55d4d2 "Eliminate mi_run_to_main,
introduce mi_clean_restart")
- a mi_runto_main (after that commit)
The now removed mi_run_to_main contained a mi_delete_breakpoints, while
mi_runto_main does not, which causes FAILs in the second scenario.
Fix this by adding the missing mi_delete_breakpoints in the test-case, and
likewise in gdb.ada/mi_catch_ex_hand.exp.
Reg-tested on x86_64-linux.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-10-14 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR testsuite/26732
* gdb.ada/mi_catch_ex.exp: Do mi_delete_breakpoints before running
scenario 2.
* gdb.ada/mi_catch_ex_hand.exp: Same.
Diffstat (limited to 'opcodes/i386-gen.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions