diff options
author | Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> | 2017-10-31 21:30:24 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> | 2017-10-31 21:34:24 -0400 |
commit | 3a87ae656c283e4f46ddf7d92c06ecb8992c2bf6 (patch) | |
tree | 1ab653b3f661835fb7e1be97739d58fb038ba44e /ld/testsuite/ld-elf | |
parent | 4d01dee4804d39c1671bc220caf32a327e7e4b10 (diff) | |
download | gdb-3a87ae656c283e4f46ddf7d92c06ecb8992c2bf6.zip gdb-3a87ae656c283e4f46ddf7d92c06ecb8992c2bf6.tar.gz gdb-3a87ae656c283e4f46ddf7d92c06ecb8992c2bf6.tar.bz2 |
Use console uiout when executing breakpoint commands
As reported here
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2017-10/msg00020.html
the output of certain commands, like backtrace, doesn't appear anywhere
when it is run as a breakpoint command and when using MI.
The reason is that the current_uiout is set to the mi_ui_out while these
commands run, whereas we want the output as CLI output. Some commands
like "print" work, because they use printf_filtered (gdb_stdout, ...)
directly, bypassing the current ui_out.
The fix I did is to force setting the cli_uiout as the current_uiout
when calling execute_control_command. I am not sure if this is the
right way to fix the problem, comments about the approach would be
appreciated.
I enhanced gdb.mi/mi-break.exp to test the backtrace command.
Regtested on the buildbot.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* cli/cli-script.c (execute_control_command): Rename to ...
(execute_control_command_1): ... this.
(execute_control_command): New function.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.mi/mi-break.exp (test_breakpoint_commands): Test backtrace
as a breakpoint command.
Diffstat (limited to 'ld/testsuite/ld-elf')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions