diff options
author | Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> | 2020-02-22 12:46:33 +1030 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> | 2020-02-22 12:53:52 +1030 |
commit | 7b3c27152b5695177a2cd5adc0d7b0255f99aca0 (patch) | |
tree | 542fe2a48f8e0ede56d52da65aa18e000f52fdcd /ld/NEWS | |
parent | dda42c0b7baba24d182a408574650ff162f44ec3 (diff) | |
download | gdb-7b3c27152b5695177a2cd5adc0d7b0255f99aca0.zip gdb-7b3c27152b5695177a2cd5adc0d7b0255f99aca0.tar.gz gdb-7b3c27152b5695177a2cd5adc0d7b0255f99aca0.tar.bz2 |
PR25585, PHDR segment not covered by LOAD segment
I closed this bug as invalid, but I think it is worth mentioning in NEWS
that older linkers didn't check PT_PHDR very well. The patch also allows
people to force an output file with --noinhibit-exec after the error.
bfd/
PR 25585
* elf.c (assign_file_positions_for_load_sections): Continue linking
on "PHDR segment not covered by LOAD segment" errors.
ld/
PR 25585
* NEWS: Mention better "PHDR segment not covered by LOAD segment"
checking.
Diffstat (limited to 'ld/NEWS')
-rw-r--r-- | ld/NEWS | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -2,6 +2,12 @@ Changes in 2.34: +* The ld check for "PHDR segment not covered by LOAD segment" is more + effective, catching cases that were wrongly allowed by previous versions of + ld. If you see this error it is likely you are linking with a bad linker + script or the binary you are building is not intended to be loaded by a + dynamic loader. In the latter case --no-dynamic-linker is appropriate. + * cr16c support removed. * Add support for z80-elf. |