diff options
| author | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2020-04-06 12:59:57 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2020-04-06 12:59:57 -0600 |
| commit | 6ee448cc2d0b9337713ecb6bb2e6305b4f504cbc (patch) | |
| tree | bc6c280d5cb3ad650f3c93b7a5c2455cf66583c7 /gdb/xml-support.c | |
| parent | dea34e8cc336a80546dac21463583a76e3e5d473 (diff) | |
| download | gdb-6ee448cc2d0b9337713ecb6bb2e6305b4f504cbc.zip gdb-6ee448cc2d0b9337713ecb6bb2e6305b4f504cbc.tar.gz gdb-6ee448cc2d0b9337713ecb6bb2e6305b4f504cbc.tar.bz2 | |
Select variant field when printing variant
When I updated the Ada variant-printing code to be value-based, I
neglected a couple of issues. First, print_variant_part must first
extract the variant field before finding the active component; second,
print_field_values should pass in the field value as the outer value
when recursing.
This patch fixes both of these issues.
gdb/ChangeLog
2020-04-06 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* ada-valprint.c (print_variant_part): Extract the variant field.
(print_field_values): Use the field as the outer value when
recursing.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2020-04-06 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* gdb.ada/variant-record/proc.adb: New file.
* gdb.ada/variant-record/value.adb: New file.
* gdb.ada/variant-record/value.s: New file.
* gdb.ada/variant-record.exp: New file.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/xml-support.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions