Let tracefile has_memory and has_all_memory.

At present, tfile target thinks it has memory but ctf doesn't.
This is an oversight when I added ctf target support.  This patch
moves the implementations of to_has_all_memory and to_has_memory to
upper layer.  After this change, both tfile and ctf target think
they have memory.

gdb:

2014-02-23  Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>

	* tracefile-tfile.c (tfile_has_all_memory): Remove.
	(tfile_has_memory): Remove.
	(init_tfile_ops): Don't set fields to_has_all_memory and
	to_has_memory of tfile_ops.
	* tracefile.c (tracefile_has_all_memory): New function.
	(tracefile_has_memory): New function.
	(init_tracefile_ops): Initialize fields to_has_all_memory and
	to_has_memory of 'ops'.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/gdb/tracefile-tfile.c b/gdb/tracefile-tfile.c
index 2daa560..3ef109e 100644
--- a/gdb/tracefile-tfile.c
+++ b/gdb/tracefile-tfile.c
@@ -1012,18 +1012,6 @@ tfile_get_trace_state_variable_value (struct target_ops *self,
   return found;
 }
 
-static int
-tfile_has_all_memory (struct target_ops *ops)
-{
-  return 1;
-}
-
-static int
-tfile_has_memory (struct target_ops *ops)
-{
-  return 1;
-}
-
 /* Callback for traceframe_walk_blocks.  Builds a traceframe_info
    object for the tfile target's current traceframe.  */
 
@@ -1105,8 +1093,6 @@ init_tfile_ops (void)
   tfile_ops.to_trace_find = tfile_trace_find;
   tfile_ops.to_get_trace_state_variable_value
     = tfile_get_trace_state_variable_value;
-  tfile_ops.to_has_all_memory = tfile_has_all_memory;
-  tfile_ops.to_has_memory = tfile_has_memory;
   tfile_ops.to_traceframe_info = tfile_traceframe_info;
 }