Fix PR breakpoints/16297: catch syscall with syscall 0

Code rationale
==============
by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

This is a fix for bug 16297. The problem occurs when the user attempts
to catch any syscall 0 (such as syscall read on Linux/x86_64). GDB was
not able to catch the syscall and was missing the breakpoint.

Now, breakpoint_hit_catch_syscall returns immediately when it finds the
correct syscall number, avoiding a following check for the end of the
search vector, that returns a no hit if the syscall number was zero.

Testcase rationale
==================
by: Sergio Durigan Junior

This testcase is a little difficult to write.  By doing a quick
inspection at the Linux source, one can see that, in many targets, the
syscall number 0 is restart_syscall, which is forbidden to be called
from userspace.  Therefore, on many targets, there's just no way to test
this safely.

My decision was to take the simpler route and just adds the "read"
syscall on the default test.  Its number on x86_64 is zero, which is
"good enough" since many people here do their tests on x86_64 anyway and
it is a popular architecture.

However, there was another little gotcha.  When using "read" passing 0
as the third parameter (i.e., asking it to read 0 bytes), current libc
implementations could choose not to effectively call the syscall.
Therefore, the best solution was to create a temporary pipe, write 1
byte into it, and then read this byte from it.

gdb/ChangeLog
2013-12-19  Gabriel Krisman Bertazi  <gabriel@krisman.be>

	PR breakpoints/16297
	* breakpoint.c (breakpoint_hit_catch_syscall): Return immediately
	when expected syscall is hit.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2013-12-19  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>

	PR breakpoints/16297
	* gdb.base/catch-syscall.c (read_syscall, pipe_syscall)
	(write_syscall): New variables.
	(main): Create a pipe, write 1 byte in it, and read 1 byte from
	it.
	* gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp (all_syscalls): Include "pipe,
	"write" and "read" syscalls.
	(fill_all_syscalls_numbers): Improve the way to obtain syscalls
	numbers.

3 files changed, 34 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 3e1c756..97ad49b 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+2013-12-19  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>
+
+	PR breakpoints/16297
+	* gdb.base/catch-syscall.c (read_syscall, pipe_syscall)
+	(write_syscall): New variables.
+	(main): Create a pipe, write 1 byte in it, and read 1 byte from
+	it.
+	* gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp (all_syscalls): Include "pipe,
+	"write" and "read" syscalls.
+	(fill_all_syscalls_numbers): Improve the way to obtain syscalls
+	numbers.
+
 2013-12-19  Keven Boell  <keven.boell@intel.com>
 
 	* gdb.fortran/module.exp: Completion matches fortran module
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.c
index 8f94191..aa5727a 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.c
@@ -16,17 +16,33 @@
 
 static int close_syscall = SYS_close;
 static int chroot_syscall = SYS_chroot;
+/* GDB had a bug where it couldn't catch syscall number 0 (PR 16297).
+   In most GNU/Linux architectures, syscall number 0 is
+   restart_syscall, which can't be called from userspace.  However,
+   the "read" syscall is zero on x86_64.  */
+static int read_syscall = SYS_read;
+static int pipe_syscall = SYS_pipe;
+static int write_syscall = SYS_write;
 static int exit_group_syscall = SYS_exit_group;
 
 int
 main (void)
 {
+	int fd[2];
+	char buf1[2] = "a";
+	char buf2[2];
+
 	/* A close() with a wrong argument.  We are only
 	   interested in the syscall.  */
 	close (-1);
 
 	chroot (".");
 
+	pipe (fd);
+
+	write (fd[1], buf1, sizeof (buf1));
+	read (fd[0], buf2, sizeof (buf2));
+
 	/* The last syscall.  Do not change this.  */
 	_exit (0);
 }
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp
index fd7d2db..5925419 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ if  { [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp $testfile ${testfile}.c] } {
 
 # All (but the last) syscalls from the example code
 # They are ordered according to the file, so do not change this.
-set all_syscalls { "close" "chroot" }
+set all_syscalls { "close" "chroot" "pipe" "write" "read" }
 set all_syscalls_numbers { }
 
 # The last syscall (exit()) does not return, so
@@ -392,11 +392,12 @@ proc do_syscall_tests_without_xml {} {
 # This procedure fills the vector "all_syscalls_numbers" with the proper
 # numbers for the used syscalls according to the architecture.
 proc fill_all_syscalls_numbers {} {
-    global all_syscalls_numbers last_syscall_number
+    global all_syscalls_numbers last_syscall_number all_syscalls
+
+    foreach syscall $all_syscalls {
+	lappend all_syscalls_numbers [get_integer_valueof "${syscall}_syscall" -1]
+    }
 
-    set close_syscall [get_integer_valueof "close_syscall" -1]
-    set chroot_syscall [get_integer_valueof "chroot_syscall" -1]
-    set all_syscalls_numbers [list $close_syscall $chroot_syscall]
     set last_syscall_number [get_integer_valueof "exit_group_syscall" -1]
 }