diff options
author | Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> | 2022-04-04 15:48:19 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> | 2022-06-15 09:44:55 +0100 |
commit | 8b39b1e7ab20609ced6a224cae440f19e6ae02c1 (patch) | |
tree | 015e347bb39704d9424f3068c1ea372146d90b48 /gdb/s12z-tdep.c | |
parent | 15e15b2d9cd3b1db68f99cd3b047352142ddfd1c (diff) | |
download | gdb-8b39b1e7ab20609ced6a224cae440f19e6ae02c1.zip gdb-8b39b1e7ab20609ced6a224cae440f19e6ae02c1.tar.gz gdb-8b39b1e7ab20609ced6a224cae440f19e6ae02c1.tar.bz2 |
gdb: refactor the non-printing disassemblers
This commit started from an observation I made while working on some
other disassembler patches, that is, that the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, is broken ... sort of.
I noticed that the gdb_buffered_insn_length function doesn't set up
the application data field if the disassemble_info structure.
Further, I noticed that some architectures, for example, ARM, require
that the application_data field be set, see gdb_print_insn_arm in
arm-tdep.c.
And so, if we ever use gdb_buffered_insn_length for ARM, then GDB will
likely crash. Which is why I said only "sort of" broken. Right now
we don't use gdb_buffered_insn_length with ARM, so maybe it isn't
broken yet?
Anyway to prove to myself that there was a problem here I extended the
disassembler self tests in disasm-selftests.c to include a test of
gdb_buffered_insn_length. As I run the test for all architectures, I
do indeed see GDB crash for ARM.
To fix this we need gdb_buffered_insn_length to create a disassembler
that inherits from gdb_disassemble_info, but we also need this new
disassembler to not print anything.
And so, I introduce a new gdb_non_printing_disassembler class, this is
a disassembler that doesn't print anything to the output stream.
I then observed that both ARC and S12Z also create non-printing
disassemblers, but these are slightly different. While the
disassembler in gdb_non_printing_disassembler reads the instruction
from a buffer, the ARC and S12Z disassemblers read from target memory
using target_read_code.
And so, I further split gdb_non_printing_disassembler into two
sub-classes, gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler and
gdb_non_printing_buffer_disassembler.
The new selftests now pass, but otherwise, there should be no user
visible changes after this commit.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/s12z-tdep.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/s12z-tdep.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/s12z-tdep.c b/gdb/s12z-tdep.c index 5394c1b..4e33faa 100644 --- a/gdb/s12z-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/s12z-tdep.c @@ -141,27 +141,6 @@ s12z_dwarf_reg_to_regnum (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int num) /* Support functions for frame handling. */ - -/* Return a disassemble_info initialized for s12z disassembly, however, - the disassembler will not actually print anything. */ - -static struct disassemble_info -s12z_disassemble_info (struct gdbarch *gdbarch) -{ - struct disassemble_info di; - init_disassemble_info_for_no_printing (&di); - di.arch = gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (gdbarch)->arch; - di.mach = gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (gdbarch)->mach; - di.endian = gdbarch_byte_order (gdbarch); - di.read_memory_func = [](bfd_vma memaddr, gdb_byte *myaddr, - unsigned int len, struct disassemble_info *info) - { - return target_read_code (memaddr, myaddr, len); - }; - return di; -} - - /* A struct (based on mem_read_abstraction_base) to read memory through the disassemble_info API. */ struct mem_read_abstraction @@ -332,15 +311,14 @@ s12z_frame_cache (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **prologue_cache) int frame_size = 0; int saved_frame_size = 0; - struct disassemble_info di = s12z_disassemble_info (gdbarch); - + struct gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler dis (gdbarch); struct mem_read_abstraction mra; mra.base.read = (int (*)(mem_read_abstraction_base*, int, size_t, bfd_byte*)) abstract_read_memory; mra.base.advance = advance ; mra.base.posn = posn; - mra.info = &di; + mra.info = dis.disasm_info (); while (this_pc > addr) { |