aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>2004-05-10 17:07:02 +0000
committerJim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>2004-05-10 17:07:02 +0000
commitc4143af614f9fdb6be35ad9e68711b197b63741b (patch)
tree2acd980986d06e79a3250949e5ed7da4e50b3b43 /gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
parent2e56e9c16fddf3a47ae0b3d053a9a9e3cd3ce3fb (diff)
downloadgdb-c4143af614f9fdb6be35ad9e68711b197b63741b.zip
gdb-c4143af614f9fdb6be35ad9e68711b197b63741b.tar.gz
gdb-c4143af614f9fdb6be35ad9e68711b197b63741b.tar.bz2
* ppc-tdep.h (struct gdbarch_tdep): Change definition of
ppc_fp0_regnum and ppc_fpscr_regnum: if they are -1, then this processor variant lacks those registers. (ppc_floating_point_unit_p): Change description to make it clear that this returns info about the ISA, not the ABI. * rs6000-tdep.c (ppc_floating_point_unit_p): Decide whether to return true or false by checking tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum and tdep->ppc_fpscr_regnum. The original code replicated the BFD arch/mach switching done in rs6000_gdbarch_init; it's better to keep that logic there, and just check the results here. (rs6000_gdbarch_init): On the E500, set tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum and tdep->ppc_fpscr_regnum to -1 to indicate that we have no floating-point registers. (ppc_supply_fpregset, ppc_collect_fpregset) (rs6000_push_dummy_call, rs6000_extract_return_value) (rs6000_store_return_value): Assert that we have floating-point registers. (rs6000_dwarf2_stab_reg_to_regnum): Add FIXME. (rs6000_frame_cache): Don't note the locations at which floating-point registers were saved if we have no fprs. * aix-thread.c (supply_fprs, fill_fprs): Assert that we have FP registers. (fetch_regs_user_thread, fetch_regs_kernel_thread) (store_regs_user_thread, store_regs_kernel_thread): Only call supply_fprs / fill_fprs if we actually have floating-point registers. (special_register_p): Check ppc_fpscr_regnum before matching against it. (supply_sprs64, supply_sprs32, fill_sprs64, fill_sprs32): Don't supply / collect fpscr if we don't have it. * ppc-bdm.c: #include "gdb_assert.h". (bdm_ppc_fetch_registers, bdm_ppc_store_registers): Assert that we have floating-point registers, since I can't test this code on FP-free systems to adapt it. * ppc-linux-nat.c (ppc_register_u_addr): Don't match against the fpscr and floating point register numbers if they don't exist. (fetch_register): Assert that we have floating-point registers before we reach the code that handles them. (store_register): Same. And use tdep instead of calling gdbarch_tdep again. (fill_fpregset): Don't try to collect FP registers and fpscr if we don't have them. (ppc_linux_sigtramp_cache): Don't record the saved locations of fprs and fpscr if we don't have them. (ppc_linux_supply_fpregset): Don't supply fp regs and fpscr if we don't have them. * ppcnbsd-nat.c: #include "gdb_assert.h". (getfpregs_supplies): Assert that we have floating-point registers. * ppcnbsd-tdep.c (ppcnbsd_supply_fpreg, ppcnbsd_fill_fpreg): Same. * ppcobsd-tdep.c: #include "gdb_assert.h". (ppcobsd_supply_gregset, ppcobsd_collect_gregset): Assert that we have floating-point registers. * rs6000-nat.c (regmap): Don't match against the fpscr and floating point register numbers if they don't exist. (fetch_inferior_registers, store_inferior_registers, fetch_core_registers): Only fetch / store / supply the floating-point registers and the fpscr if we have them. * Makefile.in (ppc-bdm.o, ppc-linux-nat.o, ppcnbsd-nat.o) (ppcobsd-tdep.o): Update dependencies.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/rs6000-tdep.c')
-rw-r--r--gdb/rs6000-tdep.c54
1 files changed, 42 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c b/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
index 4ce8fa1..5879c2c 100644
--- a/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
@@ -140,16 +140,16 @@ altivec_register_p (int regno)
return (regno >= tdep->ppc_vr0_regnum && regno <= tdep->ppc_vrsave_regnum);
}
-/* Use the architectures FP registers? */
+
+/* Return non-zero if the architecture described by GDBARCH has
+ floating-point registers (f0 --- f31 and fpscr). */
int
ppc_floating_point_unit_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
{
- const struct bfd_arch_info *info = gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (gdbarch);
- if (info->arch == bfd_arch_powerpc)
- return (info->mach != bfd_mach_ppc_e500);
- if (info->arch == bfd_arch_rs6000)
- return 1;
- return 0;
+ struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch);
+
+ return (tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum >= 0
+ && tdep->ppc_fpscr_regnum >= 0);
}
@@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ ppc_supply_fpregset (const struct regset *regset, struct regcache *regcache,
size_t offset;
int i;
+ gdb_assert (ppc_floating_point_unit_p (gdbarch));
+
offset = offsets->f0_offset;
for (i = tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum;
i < tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum + ppc_num_fprs;
@@ -301,6 +303,8 @@ ppc_collect_fpregset (const struct regset *regset,
size_t offset;
int i;
+ gdb_assert (ppc_floating_point_unit_p (gdbarch));
+
offset = offsets->f0_offset;
for (i = tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum;
i <= tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum + ppc_num_fprs;
@@ -1190,6 +1194,11 @@ rs6000_push_dummy_call (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR func_addr,
CORE_ADDR saved_sp;
+ /* The calling convention this function implements assumes the
+ processor has floating-point registers. We shouldn't be using it
+ on PPC variants that lack them. */
+ gdb_assert (ppc_floating_point_unit_p (current_gdbarch));
+
/* The first eight words of ther arguments are passed in registers.
Copy them appropriately. */
ii = 0;
@@ -1416,6 +1425,11 @@ rs6000_extract_return_value (struct type *valtype, char *regbuf, char *valbuf)
int offset = 0;
struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch);
+ /* The calling convention this function implements assumes the
+ processor has floating-point registers. We shouldn't be using it
+ on PPC variants that lack them. */
+ gdb_assert (ppc_floating_point_unit_p (current_gdbarch));
+
if (TYPE_CODE (valtype) == TYPE_CODE_FLT)
{
@@ -1727,6 +1741,9 @@ rs6000_dwarf2_stab_reg_to_regnum (int num)
if (0 <= num && num <= 31)
return tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + num;
else if (32 <= num && num <= 63)
+ /* FIXME: jimb/2004-05-05: What should we do when the debug info
+ specifies registers the architecture doesn't have? Our
+ callers don't check the value we return. */
return tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum + (num - 32);
else if (1200 <= num && num < 1200 + 32)
return tdep->ppc_ev0_regnum + (num - 1200);
@@ -1765,6 +1782,11 @@ rs6000_store_return_value (struct type *type, char *valbuf)
{
struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch);
+ /* The calling convention this function implements assumes the
+ processor has floating-point registers. We shouldn't be using it
+ on PPC variants that lack them. */
+ gdb_assert (ppc_floating_point_unit_p (current_gdbarch));
+
if (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_FLT)
/* Floating point values are returned starting from FPR1 and up.
@@ -2445,11 +2467,17 @@ rs6000_frame_cache (struct frame_info *next_frame, void **this_cache)
{
int i;
CORE_ADDR fpr_addr = cache->base + fdata.fpr_offset;
- for (i = fdata.saved_fpr; i < 32; i++)
- {
- cache->saved_regs[tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum + i].addr = fpr_addr;
- fpr_addr += 8;
- }
+
+ /* If skip_prologue says floating-point registers were saved,
+ but the current architecture has no floating-point registers,
+ then that's strange. But we have no indices to even record
+ the addresses under, so we just ignore it. */
+ if (ppc_floating_point_unit_p (gdbarch))
+ for (i = fdata.saved_fpr; i < 32; i++)
+ {
+ cache->saved_regs[tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum + i].addr = fpr_addr;
+ fpr_addr += 8;
+ }
}
/* if != -1, fdata.saved_gpr is the smallest number of saved_gpr.
@@ -2763,6 +2791,8 @@ rs6000_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
tdep->ppc_xer_regnum = 5;
tdep->ppc_ev0_regnum = 7;
tdep->ppc_ev31_regnum = 38;
+ tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum = -1;
+ tdep->ppc_fpscr_regnum = -1;
set_gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch, 0);
set_gdbarch_sp_regnum (gdbarch, tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + 1);
set_gdbarch_deprecated_fp_regnum (gdbarch, tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + 1);