aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/python
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>2023-10-11 10:30:35 +0100
committerAndrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>2023-10-16 10:01:22 +0100
commit4b2f71e6c67060e2aa0d35652de80fdc1f810ce8 (patch)
treed30dd4850b674c145a86aa93bcef1b93565a3aa9 /gdb/python
parent9f9073e5b8f7828a97d6cb1e7a43c6ad1fb40a9b (diff)
downloadgdb-4b2f71e6c67060e2aa0d35652de80fdc1f810ce8.zip
gdb-4b2f71e6c67060e2aa0d35652de80fdc1f810ce8.tar.gz
gdb-4b2f71e6c67060e2aa0d35652de80fdc1f810ce8.tar.bz2
gdb: replace architecture_changed with new_architecture observer
This commit replaces the architecture_changed observer with a new_architecture observer. Currently the only user of the architecture_changed observer is the Python code, which uses this observer to register the Python unwinder with the architecture. The problem is that the architecture_changed observer is triggered from inferior::set_arch(), which only sees the inferior-wide gdbarch value. For targets that use thread-specific architectures, these never trigger the architecture_changed observer, and so never have the Python unwinder registered with them. When it comes to unwinding GDB makes use of the frame's gdbarch, which is based on the thread's regcache gdbarch, which is set in get_thread_regcache to the value returned from target_thread_architecture, which is not always the inferiors gdbarch value, it might be a thread-specific gdbarch which has not passed through inferior::set_arch(). The new_architecture observer will be triggered from gdbarch_find_by_info, whenever a new gdbarch is created and initialised. As GDB caches and reuses gdbarch values, we should expect to see each new architecture trigger the new_architecture observer just once. After this commit, targets that make use of thread-specific architectures should be able to make use of Python unwinders. As I don't have access to a machine that makes use of thread-specific architectures right now, I asked Luis to confirm that an AArch64 target that uses SVE/SME can't use the Python unwinders in threads that are using a thread-specific architectures, and he confirmed that this is indeed the case, see this discussion: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb/87wmvsat8i.fsf@redhat.com Tested-By: Lancelot Six <lancelot.six@amd.com> Tested-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Reviewed-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/python')
-rw-r--r--gdb/python/py-unwind.c5
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/python/py-unwind.c b/gdb/python/py-unwind.c
index f8b142d..ee50c51 100644
--- a/gdb/python/py-unwind.c
+++ b/gdb/python/py-unwind.c
@@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ static const registry<gdbarch>::key<pyuw_gdbarch_data_type> pyuw_gdbarch_data;
intermediary. */
static void
-pyuw_on_new_gdbarch (inferior *inf, gdbarch *newarch)
+pyuw_on_new_gdbarch (gdbarch *newarch)
{
struct pyuw_gdbarch_data_type *data = pyuw_gdbarch_data.get (newarch);
if (data == nullptr)
@@ -974,8 +974,7 @@ pyuw_on_new_gdbarch (inferior *inf, gdbarch *newarch)
static int CPYCHECKER_NEGATIVE_RESULT_SETS_EXCEPTION
gdbpy_initialize_unwind (void)
{
- gdb::observers::architecture_changed.attach (pyuw_on_new_gdbarch,
- "py-unwind");
+ gdb::observers::new_architecture.attach (pyuw_on_new_gdbarch, "py-unwind");
if (PyType_Ready (&pending_frame_object_type) < 0)
return -1;