aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/linux-nat.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>2015-03-04 20:41:15 +0000
committerPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>2015-03-04 20:41:15 +0000
commit1cf4d9513af10d419c71099ae644f07b6724642b (patch)
tree2c5764e9dfd813f512cab31007e3090f02019273 /gdb/linux-nat.c
parentbe9957b82fa4e09c53521335c2a7dddf6d208309 (diff)
downloadgdb-1cf4d9513af10d419c71099ae644f07b6724642b.zip
gdb-1cf4d9513af10d419c71099ae644f07b6724642b.tar.gz
gdb-1cf4d9513af10d419c71099ae644f07b6724642b.tar.bz2
Teach GDB about targets that can tell whether a trap is a breakpoint event
The moribund locations heuristics are problematic. This patch teaches GDB about targets that can reliably tell whether a trap was caused by a software or hardware breakpoint, and thus don't need moribund locations, thus bypassing all the problems that mechanism has. The non-stop-fair-events.exp test is frequently failing currently. E.g., see https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/2015-q1/msg03148.html. The root cause is a fundamental problem with moribund locations. For example, the stepped_breakpoint logic added by af48d08f breaks in this case (which is what happens with that test): - Step thread A, no breakpoint is set at PC. - The kernel doesn't schedule thread A yet. - Insert breakpoint at A's PC, for some reason (e.g., a step-resume breakpoint for thread B). - Kernel finally schedules thread A. - thread A's stepped_breakpoint flag is not set, even though it now stepped a breakpoint instruction. - adjust_pc_after_break gets the PC wrong, because PC == PREV_PC, but stepped_breakpoint is not set. We needed the stepped_breakpoint logic to workaround moribund locations, because otherwise adjust_pc_after_break could apply an adjustment when it shouldn't just because there _used_ to be a breakpoint at PC (a moribund breakpoint location). For example, on x86, that's wrong if the thread really hasn't executed an int3, but instead executed some other 1-byte long instruction. Getting the PC adjustment wrong of course leads to the inferior executing the wrong instruction. Other problems with moribund locations are: - if a true SIGTRAP happens to be raised when the program is executing the PC that used to have a breakpoint, GDB will assume that is a trap for a breakpoint that has recently been removed, and thus we miss reporting the random signal to the user. - to minimize that, we get rid of moribund location after a while. That while is defined as just a certain number of events being processed. That number of events sometimes passes by before a delayed breakpoint is processed, and GDB confuses the trap for a random signal, thus reporting the random trap. Once the user resumes the thread, the program crashes because the PC was not adjusted... The fix for all this is to bite the bullet and get rid of heuristics and instead rely on the target knowing accurately what caused the SIGTRAP. The target/kernel/stub is in the best position to know what that, because it can e.g. consult priviledged CPU flags GDB has no access to, or by knowing which exception vector entry was called when the instruction trapped, etc. Most debug APIs I've seen to date report breakpoint hits as a distinct event in some fashion. For example, on the Linux kernel, whether a breakpoint was executed is exposed to userspace in the si_code field of the SIGTRAP's siginfo. On Windows, the debug API reports a EXCEPTION_BREAKPOINT exception code. We needed to keep around deleted breakpoints in an on-the-side list (the moribund locations) for two main reasons: - Know that a SIGTRAP actually is a delayed event for a hit of a breakpoint that was removed before the event was processed, and thus should not be reported as a random signal. - So we still do the decr_pc_after_break adjustment in that case, so that the thread is resumed at the correct address. In the new model, if GDB processes an event the target tells is a breakpoint trap, and GDB doesn't find the corresponding breakpoint in its breakpoint tables, it means that event is a delayed event for a breakpoint that has since been removed, and thus the event should be ignored. For the decr_pc_after_after issue, it ends up being much simpler that on targets that can reliably tell whether a breakpoint trapped, for the breakpoint trap to present the PC already adjusted. Proper multi-threading support already implies that targets needs to be doing decr_pc_after_break adjustment themselves, otherwise for example, in all-stop if two threads hit a breakpoint simultaneously, and the user does "info threads", he'll see the non-event thread that hit the breakpoint stopped at the wrong PC. This way (target adjusts) also ends up eliminating the need for some awkward re-incrementing of the PC in the record-full and Linux targets that we do today, and the need for the target_decr_pc_after_break hook. If the target always adjusts, then there's a case where GDB needs to re-increment the PC. Say, on x86, an "int3" instruction that was explicitly written in the program traps. In this case, GDB should report a random SIGTRAP signal to the user, with the PC pointing at the instruction past the int3, just like if GDB was not debugging the program. The user may well decide to pass the SIGTRAP to the program because the program being debugged has a SIGTRAP handler that handles its own breakpoints, and expects the PC to be unadjusted. Tested on x86-64 Fedora 20. gdb/ChangeLog: 2015-03-04 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * breakpoint.c (need_moribund_for_location_type): New function. (bpstat_stop_status): Don't skipping checking moribund locations of breakpoint types which the target tell caused a stop. (program_breakpoint_here_p): New function, factored out from ... (bp_loc_is_permanent): ... this. (update_global_location_list): Don't create a moribund location if the target supports reporting stops of the type of the removed breakpoint. * breakpoint.h (program_breakpoint_here_p): New declaration. * infrun.c (adjust_pc_after_break): Return early if the target has already adjusted the PC. Add comments. (handle_signal_stop): If nothing explains a signal, and the target tells us the stop was caused by a software breakpoint, check if there's a breakpoint instruction in the memory. If so, adjust the PC before presenting the stop to the user. Otherwise, ignore the trap. If nothing explains a signal, and the target tells us the stop was caused by a hardware breakpoint, ignore the trap. * target.h (struct target_ops) <to_stopped_by_sw_breakpoint, to_supports_stopped_by_sw_breakpoint, to_stopped_by_hw_breakpoint, to_supports_stopped_by_hw_breakpoint>: New fields. (target_stopped_by_sw_breakpoint) (target_supports_stopped_by_sw_breakpoint) (target_stopped_by_hw_breakpoint) (target_supports_stopped_by_hw_breakpoint): Define. * target-delegates.c: Regenerate.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/linux-nat.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions