aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/infrun.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>2017-04-19 13:12:23 +0100
committerPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>2017-04-19 13:12:23 +0100
commit9bcb1f1630b05594fa86bfd017639cfcc966b11c (patch)
tree2f32099a2ea3e9427249d6911529c6b3b4c6d332 /gdb/infrun.c
parent26fcd539dd38a27259d8179152d617118f016706 (diff)
downloadgdb-9bcb1f1630b05594fa86bfd017639cfcc966b11c.zip
gdb-9bcb1f1630b05594fa86bfd017639cfcc966b11c.tar.gz
gdb-9bcb1f1630b05594fa86bfd017639cfcc966b11c.tar.bz2
Make inferior::detaching a bool, and introduce scoped_restore::release()
I left making inferior::detaching a bool to a separate patch, because doing that makes a make_cleanup_restore_integer call in infrun.c:prepare_for_detach no longer compile (passing a 'bool *' when an 'int *' is expected). Since we want to get rid of cleanups anyway, I looked at converting that to a scoped_restore. However, prepare_for_detach wants to discard the cleanup on success, and scoped_restore doesn't have an equivalent for that. So I added one -- I called it "release()" because it seems like a natural fit in the way standard components call similarly-spirited methods, and, it's also what the proposal for a generic scope guard calls it too, AFAICS: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4189.pdf I've added some scoped_guard unit tests, while at it. gdb/ChangeLog: 2017-04-19 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * Makefile.in (SUBDIR_UNITTESTS_SRCS): Add unittests/scoped_restore-selftests.c. (SUBDIR_UNITTESTS_OBS): Add scoped_restore-selftests.o. * common/scoped_restore.h (scoped_restore_base): Make "class". (scoped_restore_base::release): New public method. (scoped_restore_base::scoped_restore_base): New protected ctor. (scoped_restore_base::m_saved_var): New protected field. (scoped_restore_tmpl::scoped_restore_tmpl(T*)): Initialize the scoped_restore_base base class instead of m_saved_var directly. (scoped_restore_tmpl::scoped_restore_tmpl(T*, T2)): Likewise. (scoped_restore_tmpl::scoped_restore_tmpl(const scoped_restore_tmpl<T>&)): Likewise. (scoped_restore_tmpl::~scoped_restore_tmpl): Use the saved_var method. (scoped_restore_tmpl::saved_var): New method. (scoped_restore_tmpl::m_saved_var): Delete. * inferior.h (inferior::detaching): Now a bool. * infrun.c (prepare_for_detach): Use a scoped_restore instead of a cleanup. * unittests/scoped_restore-selftests.c: New file.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/infrun.c')
-rw-r--r--gdb/infrun.c8
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index c7298a3..fcafdc1 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -3630,7 +3630,6 @@ prepare_for_detach (void)
{
struct inferior *inf = current_inferior ();
ptid_t pid_ptid = pid_to_ptid (inf->pid);
- struct cleanup *old_chain_1;
struct displaced_step_inferior_state *displaced;
displaced = get_displaced_stepping_state (inf->pid);
@@ -3644,8 +3643,7 @@ prepare_for_detach (void)
fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
"displaced-stepping in-process while detaching");
- old_chain_1 = make_cleanup_restore_integer (&inf->detaching);
- inf->detaching = 1;
+ scoped_restore restore_detaching = make_scoped_restore (&inf->detaching, true);
while (!ptid_equal (displaced->step_ptid, null_ptid))
{
@@ -3685,12 +3683,12 @@ prepare_for_detach (void)
inferior, so this must mean the process is gone. */
if (!ecs->wait_some_more)
{
- discard_cleanups (old_chain_1);
+ restore_detaching.release ();
error (_("Program exited while detaching"));
}
}
- discard_cleanups (old_chain_1);
+ restore_detaching.release ();
}
/* Wait for control to return from inferior to debugger.