aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/infrun.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSimon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>2021-02-02 10:40:53 -0500
committerSimon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>2021-02-02 10:42:12 -0500
commit9307efbe9eb58fb041d09b1e35cffd377d20e708 (patch)
tree4d059caa8700fb10faf6b8703d5c99a544b871b5 /gdb/infrun.c
parente57933dc9cda3292f0baadbf80ff07d398566abb (diff)
downloadgdb-9307efbe9eb58fb041d09b1e35cffd377d20e708.zip
gdb-9307efbe9eb58fb041d09b1e35cffd377d20e708.tar.gz
gdb-9307efbe9eb58fb041d09b1e35cffd377d20e708.tar.bz2
gdb/testsuite: add test for .debug_{rng,loc}lists section without offset array
It is possible for the tables in the .debug_{rng,loc}lists sections to not have an array of offsets. In that case, the offset_entry_count field of the header is 0. The forms DW_FORM_{rng,loc}listx (reference by index) can't be used with that table. Instead, the DW_FORM_sec_offset form, which references a {rng,loc}list by direct offset in the section, must be used. From what I saw, this is what GCC currently produces. Add tests for this case. I didn't see any bug related to this, I just think that it would be nice to have coverage for this. A new `-with-offset-array` option is added to the `table` procs, used when generating {rng,loc}lists, to decide whether to generate the offset array. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * lib/dwarf.exp (rnglists): Add -no-offset-array option to table proc. * gdb.dwarf2/rnglists-sec-offset.exp: Add test for .debug_rnglists table without offset array. * gdb.dwarf2/loclists-sec-offset.exp: Add test for .debug_loclists table without offset array. Change-Id: I8e34a7bf68c9682215ffbbf66600da5b7db91ef7
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/infrun.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions